Abstract
This paper will discuss the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the
practicality of expecting other countries to uphold and enforce these rights. Specific examples
will be used to address these fundamental rights and how they are and are not applied by other
countries. By looking at the history of a countries leadership and timeline of certain events we
can draw a conclusion as to why these rights are not always enforced by a government.
conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. (UDHR 2014) Right
at the start of the Declaration the Union of South Africa would be in non-compliance and their
government would be at stake. This was only furthered by the Declaration in Article 2 stating
that everyone is created equal without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language,
religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. The
Union of South Africa was attempting to protect its government built on Apartheid by not
allowing these human rights into their society.
Another prime example of a country that could not and would not implicate the
Declaration of Human Rights was the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was a collection of States
that were ruled by communism and a Marxist ideology. Basic human rights were viewed
differently because of this, the general rationalization in a communistic society is that society in
a whole is who deserves rights, not just rights on an individual basis. Such rights were access to
health care, adequate nutrition, guaranteed employment and education on all levels. These rights
seem well thought when put on paper, but in practice and implementation they proved to be folly.
One such difference between the Declaration of Human Rights and the Soviet Unions
basic human rights came from Article 17 which states Everyone has the right to own property
alone as well as in association with others. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.
(UDHR 2014) The Soviet Union controlled all property, private and commercial, for the
betterment of the State and to ease the implementation of its ideals of healthcare, housing,
nutrition and education. Unfortunately these guaranteed human rights were not always met in the
country with many homeless and starving to death because of the government squandering
supplies.
We see further oppression in the form of freedom of speech and assembly, Article 19
states Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom
to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas
through any media and regardless of frontiers. Followed by Article 20 Everyone has the right
to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. No one may be compelled to belong to an
association. (UDHR 2014) This was strictly not allowed in the Soviet Union because it
appeared to be dissent towards the government and was punishable by 2-10 year prison
sentences.
In conclusion we can deduce that it is not practical for all countries to enforce these rights
on behalf of their people. In the end if a government wishes to maintain control of its people and
its resources these human rights cannot work alongside that. It will be up to the people to tell the
government what they want and demand the rights they are born with. Since its inception and
adoption the Declaration of Human Rights has opened the eyes of many citizens in numerous
countries and has started even more human rights movements. Hopefully one day in the future
we will see these human rights practiced around the world by all forms of government.
5
References