Executive Summary
Of all the Hackett Key Issues Studies conducted in the last five years, the 2013 edition shows the greatest yearover-last change in priorities for both performance and capability-related issues. Procurement executives expect to
be extremely busy in the coming year supporting the enterprise focus on profitable growth. In response, they are
working to expand the quantity and quality of their organizations spend influence via sourcing, category management
and increasingly, supplier relationship management. Many of their priorities in the coming year will require greater
cross-functional collaboration with business units, functional partners, Global Business Services groups and third
parties. While priorities may vary based on individual enterprise strategies, in 2013 the overarching goal is to deliver
more value without more resources.
In 2013, enterprises are trying to not just grow globally, but to balance local agility with
global scale in their value chains. To do so, internal business services that support them
must be equally borderless, from the geographic, organizational, technology and other
standpoints.
Four imperatives were identified by participants in our 2013 Enterprise Key Issues Study:
Fostering the agility required to achieve profit goals when revenue falls short of
expectations, and to add value to procurement services without additional headcount
or budget.
Continuing to move toward a more standardized and global approach to the business
and to procurement operations.
Maturing the concepts of process ownership beyond the basics of process
standardization, and creating value by working across functional, business unit and
geographic borders.
Obtaining insights, intelligence and actionable strategies from data generated by
procurement activities.
It is likely that growth will always be the top priority for CEOs, but for the other senior
executives (including procurement leaders) who participated in the study, improving
operating margin actually overtook increasing revenue compared to 2012 (Fig. 1).
Largest
increase
90%
88%
Improve customer
service/satisfaction
88%
83%
82%
Enhance employee/talent
retention and development
82%
77%
77%
74%
68%
49%
+/- 3% CHANGE FROM 2012
The enterprise is looking under every stone for improvement opportunities. This of course
helps set the agenda for procurement organizations to support. On the revenue and
growth enablement front alone, procurement organizations have a broad spectrum of
supplier engagement options planned to support enterprise strategies in 2013 (Fig. 2).
FIG. 2 Procurement initiatives planned for next 12-24 months in support of the enterprise strategy
Enterprise growth strategies
Developing/improving traditional
products and services
43%
36%
Pursuing game-changing
innovation/technology
34%
Supplier-related activity
39%
82%
43%
31%
28%
65%
34%
22%
79%
62%
33%
55%
Related initiatives
A strategic/business planning process
effectively supporting growth
and related initiatives
25%
46%
43%
25%
36%
32%
34%
21%
HIGH
48%
35%
71%
68%
Supplier diversity;
supplier sustainability
68%
Supplier capability/
capacity development
Supplier acquisitions
Strategic supplier partnering
(e.g., JVs, joint IP licensing)
MODERATE
The challenge will be finding a way to fund these strategic pursuits when staffing and
budgets remain tight. Although revenue is expected to grow during 2012-2013, albeit
slowing relative to 2011-2012, procurement budgets will be flat going into 2013, with
operating budgets expected to drop by 0.40% and FTE levels by 0.50% (Fig. 3).
FIG. 3 Projected changes in revenue, procurement budgets and headcount
Overall revenue growth
7.9%
Procurement operating
budget
6.5%
1.16%
0.31%
-0.40%
2012 COMPARED TO 2011
-0.50%
2013 COMPARED TO 2012
Since procurement, like other functions, is being required to do more with less, it will
need to do things differently. Based on the Key Issues Study findings, there is plenty of
change on the horizon:
Globalizing value chains means globalizing direct as well as indirect procurement resources that are increasingly part of a broader business services delivery group, such
as a Global Business Services organization.1 Companies have average of 12% of their
FTEs already located in low-cost regions, a number that is expected to reach 21% in
within two years.
Roughly one-third to one-half of companies have created a global design for policy/
strategy standards, process designs, technology platforms, KPIs and master data management (MDM) with plans to increase those levels to 50-60% within three years.
KPIs, MDM and near-real-time analytics are key to enabling closed-loop performance
management processes for the enterprise (i.e., enterprise performance management,
or EPM) or for procurement/supply chain (which Hackett calls supply performance
management).2 Timely analytics are not always easy to come by in large, global enterprises. In our recent globalization study, we found that 80% of top-quartile performers offer visibility in near real-time or within one day, compared to only 28% of the
peer group.
Since a one-size-fits-all procurement Service Delivery Model (SDM) is insufficient for
the complex needs of large organizations, the ability to mass-customize procurement
processes as services by category, stakeholder, contract type, buy-pay channel, geography, etc., is paramount. Using a procurement SDM to design tailored services for
end-to-end processes is a key principle behind enterprise process ownership (sometimes known as global process ownership) and Global Business Services strategies.
In the study, we found that 21% of procurement organizations are scoping their enterprise process ownership to cross-functional, end-to-end processes (e.g., purchase-topay or source-to-settle).
Building these new capabilities is not easy, and procurement, perhaps more than any
other function, realizes the importance of tailoring its approach to influence stakeholders
and help them gain better performance outcomes. This means helping to maximize the
In 2012, The Hackett Group conducted a globalization research study and created an associated Globalization Index to measure the extent of globalization of the enterprise operating model; globalization of business
services delivery (including procurement); and finally, the degree of alignment between the two.
Procurement Executive Insight I The Hackett Group I 3
value of third-party relationships. As with last years Key Issues Study, the 2013 edition
validated that procurement is generally doing a good job helping stakeholders capture
this value, especially relative to how well other functions perform. Only 10-20% of nonprocurement study respondents believe that uncaptured value is a major issue for 2013
(Fig. 4).
FIG. 4 Only a small minority of non-procurement executives feel that untapped supplier
value and procurement value are major issues for 2013
Percent of procurement stakeholders indicating
they have difficulty getting enough value
from supplier relationships
59%
5%
14%
55%
52%
5%
45%
20%
3%
14%
13%
47%
20%
35%
11%
40%
Finance
33%
IT
29%
33%
HR
Finance
27%
24%
IT
HR
See the two-part Hackett series on supply analytics and information management referenced in the Related
Hackett Research section at the end of this document.
Procurement Executive Insight I The Hackett Group I 4
90%
53%
Expand purchasings
scope/influence
76%
44%
76%
51%
69%
42%
56%
39%
52%
40%
Free up cash
Reduce procurement
operating cost
52%
25%
50%
32%
Enable growth
beyond innovation
Environmental sustainability
or supplier diversity
34%
20%
26%
2012
2013
Managing supply risk has also increased in priority as a means of profit protection. Supplier
compliance is receiving particular attention, with an emphasis on efficient management
of cross-functional workflows relating to regulatory requirements and supplier compliance
with performance expectations. These processes create headaches for suppliers and
buyers alike, and can detract from strategic value creation when participants are bogged
down in processing paper and spreadsheets. Building such capabilities is a combination
of process change (e.g., using supplier stratification to tailor workflows and information),
master data management, analytics, measurement systems and more, and leads naturally
to the topic of improving procurement capabilities in 2013 (Fig. 6).
Strategic sourcing
88%
58%
Category management
81%
53%
64%
52%
64%
43%
Upgrade of talent/skills
57%
34%
56%
38%
Continuous imprvovement
50%
32%
45%
26%
Process sourcing/placement
Knowledge management
43%
19%
34%
17%
33%
23%
14%
2012
2013
SMI types
31%
35%
62%
23%
23%
58%
34%
57%
32%
24%
56%
31%
24%
55%
16%
51%
35%
SMI strategies
31%
39%
11% 50%
42%
8% 50%
40%
8% 48%
31%
35%
37%
16%
11%
47%
46%
8% 45%
40%
5% 45%
31%
13%
34%
44%
8% 42%
31%
33%
2%
Of course, SMI is only one type of capability that is being established in CoEs (Fig. 8).
Sourcing workflow support (including tactical sourcing and buying desks), analytics,
knowledge management, benchmarking, training and other areas are similarly popular.
CoEs can be run in the procurement organization, corporate headquarters, the Global
Business Services organization or even in business units (the latter via a virtual model, in
which resources report through the CoE but remain at their normal work location).
59%
Analytics
58%
22%
29%
54%
25%
Regulatory compliance
(if different from supply risk)
52%
12% 7%
Knowledge management
47%
Technology support
47%
Benchmarking, KPIs,
value measurement/tracking
45%
43%
Program/project management
42%
Contract/commercial excellence
35%
Talent management
35%
6% 11%
19%
6%
11% 4%
33%
9%
7%
29%
14% 5%
52%
Supplier support/help-desk
28%
15%
7%
50%
A FOCUS IN 2013
27%
50%
Specialized domains
(e.g., logistics, asset disposition)
IN PLACE,
WORKING WELL
27%
32%
7%
26%
25%
7% 12%
35%
39%
Finance-specific
(e.g., costing, auditing, working capital)
28%
9%
24%
4% 8%
4% 18%
35%
19%
4% 16%
25%
A FOCUS IN 2013
(TO INTEGRATE WITH
CORPORATE CoE/GBS)
Strategic Implications
It is clear from the 2013 Key Issues Study that procurement is going to be very busy
in the coming year, not only just to stay in step with the business, but also to build
capabilities for the longer term. The three areas of capability-building receiving the most
attention are category management, supplier relationship management (SRM) and
improving the source-to-settle operating model. Most procurement organizations have
a weaker formal mandate than they would like in these areas, but the smartest among
them have learned to be opportunistic, using external events and internal business
initiatives to provide the impetus for building new capabilities. They are also more
deliberate in systematizing newly built capabilities in order to extend them to additional
areas of spend and stakeholder engagement.
Unquestionably, this continual process of broadening procurements value objectives,
scorecard and capabilities is arduous. More than brute strength, flexibility will help the
procurement organization go global in step with the business.
Related Research
Unlimited Options to Realize Borderless Business Services: Distilling the Key Issues of
2013, January 2013
Procurement Centers of Excellence, December 2012
The Case for Enterprise Process Ownership: Spotlight on the Purchase-to-Pay Process,
November 2012
World-Class Supply Analytics and Information Management, Part 1: Analytics, May 2012
World-Class Supply Analytics and Information Management, Part 2: Supply Information
Management, May 2012
Michel Janssen
Pierre Mitchell
Lynne Schneider
Email: info@thehackettgroup.com
www.thehackettgroup.com
Atlanta +1 770 225 3600
London +44 20 7398 9100
Atlanta, New York, Chicago, San Francisco,
London, Paris, Frankfurt, Amsterdam,
Budapest, Hyderabad, Sydney
This publication has been prepared for general guidance on the matters addressed herein. It does not constitute professional advice.
You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice.
2013 The Hackett Group, Inc.; All Rights Reserved. | 6000131