World Bank (2010) What can we learn from nutrition impact evaluations? Washington, D.C.
PoSHAN Study
Goal
Focus
Process
Understand policy and
programming
processes
Community
Understand agriculture-tonutrition linkages thru
population-based
assessments
Population-based:
Communities, Households,
Mothers and Children<5 yrs
Lead
Collaborators
VaRG, PAHS,
Tribuvan U.
Legend
Mountain Districts
Hill Districts
Terai
Level
Institution/Individual
National
Regional
District
Ilaka
VDC
Ward
Frequency
76
46
89
46
26
103
386
Valid Percent
19.7
11.9
23.1
11.9
6.7
26.7
100
Source: PoSHAN data 2013
11
Respondent type/function
Government official
283
73.3
NGO official
97
25.1
INGO official
1.6
386
100
Total
20.7
7.9
3.8
0.016
13.8
3.2
0.002
15.1
22.8
0.014
N=278
N=79
N=29
N= 369 more
Source: PoSHAN data 2013
13
33%
59%
34%
50%
65%
70%
21%
46%
22%
20%
27%
39%
24%
26%
23%
12%
11%
20%
p=0.000
Source:PoSHAN data 2013
16
NGOs
22%
33%
33%
35%
42%
34%
8%
54%
6%
26%
20%
29%
11%
26%
8%
23%
11%
43%
P=0.002
Region
District
Ilaka
Yes
17%
35%
29%
No
49%
47%
52%
All (mean)
32%
49%
Source: PoSHAN data 2013
18
19
Source: Swart et al. (2008) Nutrition: Primary Health Care Perspective (Durban)
So many questions
Appropriate sample frames and RCT approach to
policy research?
Analytical approach connecting date on policy
fidelity outcomes at field level?
What is the counterfactual in policy and
implementation process enhancement?
Determining significance in policy analysis.
20
Many collaborators: