Anda di halaman 1dari 88

1

Londonistan
(Little Pakistan)

Omar Butt

Londonistan
(Little Pakistan)

Omar Butt

Contents (3)
List of diagrams (5)
Introduction The rule of Muslims (7)
Chapter 1 -The religion of Islam in the UK (9)
1.1 Biology
1.2 Religion
1.3 Religious practice
1.4 Religious affiliation
1.5 20,40
Chapter 2 The religion of Islam in the UK and the USA (34)
2.1 Outright
2.2 Baby names
2.3 The filter
2.4 The religion of Islam in USA
2.5 The future statistical convergence of Muslim and Christian
populations in UK and USA
2.6 How will the world manage?

Chapter 3 The religion of Islam in the UK and the USA II (72)


3.1 Outcast America
3.2 The insignificance of Christianity
3.3 The liberation of UK
3.4 Colonialism
3.5 Neo-colonialism and decolonialism
3.6 Statehood as atavism or antiquity

3.7 Religious ratios


3.8 The reproductive religious believers ratio
Chapter 4 Little Pakistan (86)
4.1 The sack of the new Roman empire
4.2 Conclusion a new survey

List of diagrams
Figure 1: 2011 Muslim religious affiliation in London boroughs
Figure 2: The possible overtaking of Islam over all religions in America
(outright 2- Muslim congregants are shown in millions against Christian)
Figure 3: Maximum Muslim England
Figure 4 : Unlike Christians, Muslims have in the UK, millions of congregants per
week
Figure 5: Most popular name by region 2012
Figure 6: Filter 1: Left-side showing religious practice of families and right-side
showing surveyed humanist measures
Figure 7: Filter 2: Two distinct stages. Firstly the incorporation of ethics in
American life as philosophically from Christianity although practice may be
different; and secondly, the three stages of secondary filter or 2020 vision (or 2040
or 2060), which prove America is a Muslim country
Figure 8: American Judeo-Christianity- hundreds of millions of people who are as
of yet unconnected to anything.
Figure 9: Islam in the USA- mere millions of people, heavily interactive at the
personal, social, political, religious levels.
Figure 10: Americans may have big circles as above but there is an insignificant
intersection between faith, religion, family life and of course, practice.
Figure 11: The middle intersection of American Christians- 10 m.
Figure 12: The middle intersection of Muslim Americans- 11 m.
Figure 13: Muslim majority UK in non-Muslim ruled land
Figure 14: The statistical overtaking of Islam over all religions in UK in 2061 (in
millions)
Figure 15: Muslim majority America in non-Muslim ruled land

Figure 16: The statistical overtaking of Islam over all religions in America in 2060
(in millions). Assuming Christians excludes Catholics and adherents are measured
by number of congregants.
Figure 17: Proportion in economic activity
Figure 18: Table showing China as the new head of economically developed
countries
Figure 19: The rise of the Islamic faith in America- Millions of congregants per
week
Figure 20: The rise of the Islamic faith in Britain - Millions of congregants per
week
Figure 21: Extrapolated 2011 Census table of daily/ weekly worshippers in London
places of worship who are Muslim or Christian.
Figure 22: Christians are a relative minority in London and Muslims far exceed
Christians as per both daily and weekly worshippers (New survey)

Introduction
The rule of Muslims
Given UK as a whole has millions of Pakistanis whereas London hasnt, it
is natural to include Little Pakistan here as including Bangladeshis too.
This gives half a million. Perhaps a million with Indians too. In fact a
relative majority by 20 to 30 years will be indeed considered an absolute
majority if we include Indians.

The moment that the white British become a minority will symbolize a huge
transfer of power
-

David Coleman, professor of demographics, University of Oxford


(regarding his own predicted date of 2066)

In this book, I have drawn up information charting London in the future


potentially having a Muslim majority (perhaps after 30 -40 odd years). This
is assuming that the Muslim population doubles and redoubles rapidly
whilst the non-Muslim population is stagnant. The example of 20 Muslims
ruling the 80 non-Muslims can take place in Crimea today. The country is
20% Muslim as say Hizb ut Tahrir.
Notably London and therefore UK and areas of earth such as Canada,
Australia and New Zealand too are 1/8 Muslim if not 1/5 at the last
census. Very soon, the UK capital will be 1/7 or 14%, perhaps this year it
already is. Soon this will be 1/6 or 17% and then 1/5 or 20%.
Sociologists from this country have said that the coming generation will
see a huge transfer of power from Christians to Muslims as weekly
participation in religious services goes from being more in one party to
more in the other.
Even now the man in the street being a practitioner of a Christian religious
activity is 2 in 100 whereas of being a congregant in a Muslim place of
worship is as well 1 in 50 or 2 in 100. The perceived unlikelihood of this is

itself to be eradicated over the next few decades, as church of England


numbers decline and Islam gathers adherents by the million or by the
percentage point.
Whereas today out of 100 people, 2 practise Christianity, 2 are practising
Muslim, it may be 1 is of the Anglican or Christian denomination,
compared to several being practising Muslims. It is even conceivable that
under % will be practising Anglicanism, just like on a daily basis at
present in many areas in London.
This is the insignificance of Christianism. That today, even in the UK, 0 or
1% pray daily; whereas in Islam, the unofficial religion, several percentiles,
3% pray in places of worship.
At this rate for UK and USA, we can predict for 50 years time, Muslims
equalling Christians as one group rises the other falls in number.
Indeed what is of note is that given, in London, for example the
population is Christian, so assumedly of these are White British and
Christian, perhaps slightly less. Muslim, Pakistanis (including
Bangladeshis) are about a million or 6 %. For these to equal off is
possible in only 3 decades, that is 2 census periods or the next census after
the coming one, at 2 millions.
Mapping this for the UK as a whole for the next 50 years or for the USA for
the next 50 years is not impossible. What remains is the threat of
ghettoisation, Little Pakistan or North Pakistan. With only one census
between now and then (ie 2031), it is a much awaited one at that. Will
Islam replace Christianity? Remember 2030 is closer than 2000.
Britain is to become part of Islam in the eyes of the British, surely this is of
greater significance, culturally, politically, economically and religiously;
and that if it takes place, in 50 years, it is through our, as Muslims
willingness to die for our faith, and this is transition. That even a Pareto, or
partial group can rule the British Isles.

Chapter 1 - The religion of Islam in the UK


1.1- Biology
Islamic biological replacement theory- A study of UK birth rates
The non-Muslim faiths, led by christianism, in the UK, are going down in
size of population. They fail within consecutive census periods to
reproduce or replace the number of people. This is deemed as due to the
break-down of social structures such as prescribed by religious and faith
practices. Specifically:

Marriage
Kinship and social structures
Sexual intercourse as sanctioned by revelatory ethics
Heterosexual norms
Punishments for sexual deviants

Note that these are anthropological, or biologically anthropological


concepts, not strictly sociological but rather closer to biological breakdown. For example, punishments and proscriptions (things labelled haram
and deserving of punishment in the next life) are not addressed directly,
rather it is the break-down of biology we are concerned with. Biological
reproduction in its right and wrong ways.
With divorce rates, homosexuality, and other non-reproductive sexual
forms soaring, reproduction has become impossible for Britons, especially
those with a non-replacing biology.
The economic argument too is completely separate. The rich may wish to
reproduce comparatively less, but in the UK we look at everybody and use
a normally representative sample. Everyone is slightly richer, so why
would non-Muslims be biologically non-replacing?
Non-reproductive sexual activity
Courtship is an example of how non-Muslims spend their lives without
finding a sexual mate. Celibacy of the priesthood is another. What has
happened, to be frank and honest, is that perversions, such as pornography

10

and paedophilia have caused moral decay and demise of the system of
reproduction of humanity. Perhaps it is because of the warbent policy of
the warmongering armies who war in foreign lands: If they kill innocent
fathers of Muslim children, it lends for them to destroy the role of father
within families.
The death of man/ the father
Fathers take care of families of a society. If they lose this place in societies
of foreign communities it will have an effect at home, here in the UK too.
Fatherless children are already more common in the USA, for example
than children with both parents, that is who live with and grow up with
both biological parents.
In Afghanistan, millions of martyrs have meant for (due to there being
family sizes of 5-10) millions of orphans over the years of Soviet and US
invasion. It is no surprise out of under a hundred million American
children, similarly tens of millions dont live with both parents. Of just
under a million children born in UK hospitals in 2015, half will not live
with both parents.
Biological replacement and reproduction
The study looks at both aspects of biological maladjustment, biological
non-replacement and biological non-reproduction. First I will deal with
non-replacement:
We should look at the change from one generation to another. An average
age at child-rearing age should be used as a yardstick for the length of
study of population change.
To calculate this we take the average age of child rearing add the average
age of having the last child and divide by two:
(28.1+30.1)/2=29.1 so three census periods. We will choose the last three,
1991 to 2011.
So, a rate of non-replacement can be studied. This is the change in birth
rate or the fertility rate. Specifically, the negativity of our non-Muslim

11

religions birth and fertility rates. Birth rate is defined as number of live
births per 1000 of population whereas fertility rate is taken to mean the
change in the crude birth rate annual figure.
Replacement theory concerns itself with Muslim population having high
birth rates and high fertility rates. Conversely, non-replacement is the
negativity of other religions birth rate, and non-reproduction is the
negativity of other religions fertility rates.
Here, we deduct from total population, atheist populations, assuming all
the rest are of other religions. The growth with Islam is compared, and
interestingly, there is a significant difference in all the last three censuses.
Over the generation the Muslim ummah outgrows non-Muslim religions
by net 13,695 million. Over two million from Muslims born in the period
and over eleven million due to decline in kafir religions numbers.
The generation after this one (ie the next one after 1981-2011) will no doubt
see more Muslims than all other religions combined. So that would be
about 2041, there will be more Muslims than non-Muslim religionists.
Now, I will deal with non-reproduction:
Assuming wedlock is the only appropriate form for marital relations,
children born out of wedlock will be taken as a percentage for nonreproduction:
So America has a half, Ireland a third and England a quarter of all live
births are to unmarried mothers. No doubt in all Muslim countries there is
no figure for this and it is deemed inappropriate and therefore
insignificant. Muslims are reproducing whereas non-Muslims it would
seem are non-reproducing.
Birth rates, fertility rates and employment rates
In conclusion, to this chapter, we could have taken the fertility rate to mean
the rate of change of the birth rate, instead I have deducted the atheists
from the total and taken that to mean non-Muslim religions. Including
those who say they have no religion would be an unfair estimate to
compare for religions.

12

New ideas are there in the sense that Muslim fertility is seen as the total (ie
gross) growth in the Muslim population in a year. The ideas of nonreplacement and non-reproduction too are new. Combining the two ideas,
of non- Muslims being both non-replacing and non-reproducing gives us
potentially a ratio of not how many are affiliated with Islam or not, nor
how many are married against single-parent families but how many from
Islam and from disbelievers collectively excluding atheists, are what I will
term reproductive religious believers. This rate is attained by multiplying
the rate of Muslims by the rate of legal marriages or the rate of disbelievers
by the number of non-single-parent families.
By comparing reproductive religious believers in all faith groups it is
possible to know, specifically with regard to social convention and the
future, which group has surpassed the rest, if it is Islam or not.
I will name this ratio the reproductive religious believers ratio.
Accordingly, it is very hard to show Islam doing badly as America, as an
example, has its Christian figure augmented for Religious and
Believer in God as well as having single-parent families taken out. It
gives us a figure for religious practice where the 50% of Christians, only
25% are practising, based on attendance (number of congregants). This
becomes 12.5% are religious, which becomes 6.25% believers and only 3%
reproductive religious believers due to the illegitimacy of half of the
children. Muslims then are dominant as of 5% of the population translates
into 4% reproductive religious believers in most states, all of whom are
living with both parents, believers, religious and who practise.
The figure is similar to a productive religious believers percentage where
unemployed persons are deducted and employed believers percentage is
given.
For brevitys sake I will include my calculations for just a few countries:
Islam vs Christianity
UK---4%/0.5%
London----10%/5%
USA----4%/3%

13

Ireland----- 1%/2%
The figures show how due largely to non-replacement and nonreproduction of Christians, in the UK, as in the US, the number of Muslims
is not only growing but doubling very quickly, for example between 1990
and 2010 (twenty years) and again between 2010 and 2030 it is projected to
do the same.
Further, the rate of growth, taken as a percentage is too doubling, in the
UK, every twenty years, displaying exponential growth.
The American data shows firstly that the non-Muslim birth rates
worldwide are lower and secondly that the predicted rates are falling
below zero eventually. Non-replacement corresponds to the first point,
that the Muslim birth rates are significantly above the non-Muslim ones,
and non-reproduction corresponds to the second point, that the overall
non-Muslim rate is not only heading below zero but that that means the
total population is decreasing.
Just to reiterate, non-replacement and non-reproduction of disbelievers
means that they have a negative birth rate relatively (to the Muslim birth
rate) and absolutely (to their own previous years rates). It also means that
their numbers are falling whereas ours are rising and that their rate of
decline is rising whilst our numbers increase exponentially.
What we then need to look at instead of just birth rates being preferred
over population figures as a whole; is the religious practices and how they
develop into the future based on current trends.

14

1.2 Religion
Here, in the UK, Muslims are some 35% of the total population in certain
London boroughs. As we are (or at least our parents and grandparents
were) reproducing at disproportionately higher rates than our Christian
counterparts, sometimes we are tripling our population where theirs is
levelling off, we expect to become a majority over them within a few
decades, in their own eyes.
Perhaps, what is not relevant is the monarchy or the official religion of the
country (or countries) but that within a few decades, given that the
population change (largely due to our population explosion) is going to
effect not only schools and so on but the so-called establishment of the
church and so on (eg. Universities and so on) is that Islam needs to be
mobilised to replace churches with mosques, secular education with
religious education and so on as well as Christians with Muslims.
In fact, unless the legal institutions arent replaced with more humane and
equal ones, they will not stand as they will fail to bare the weight of a
country where people go to mosque more often than church.
If children go to madrassa or have a Molvi come home to teach why
should we expect them to settle with Jesus or Trinity college in Oxford
or Cambridge? If the Muslim population explosion yields a quadrupling
within if not 20 years then however many years (30 years then) we must
assume that since Catholicism is not allowed ascension to the throne yet
churches are often Catholic, due to their presumed higher level of
attendance, that Muslims must follow the same path. The 1,500 or so
mosques in the UK accommodate a maximum of, (times 500) 750,000
worshippers, congregations have to be doubled per service. Should the
population double, will they quadruple? Should mosque-building take
place so that, like catholics (and church of England established churches)
there are tens of thousands?
If there are more Muslim congregants in the UK in mosques (Muslim
places of worship) there should be more in a daily and weekly basis, than
there are Christian congregants in the UK in churches (Christian places of
worship), there should be more mosques than churches or at least more
mosques should be built than churches.

15

London boroughs
Camden
City of London
Hackney
Hammersmith and
Fulham
Haringey
Islington
Kensington and
Chelsea
Lambeth
Lewisham
Newham
Southwark
Tower Hamlets
Wandsworth
Westminster
Barking and Dagenham
Barnet
Bexley
Brent
Bromley
Croydon
Ealing
Enfield
Greenwich
Harrow
Havering
Hillingdon
Hounslow
Kingston upon Thames
Merton
Redbridge
Richmond upon
Thames
Sutton
Waltham Forest
Total or average

Muslims
26,643
409
34,727

Muslim
% age
12.09%
5.55%
14.10%

182,493
254,926
206,125

18,242
36,130
19,521

10.00%
14.17%
9.47%

158,649
303,086
275,885
307,984
288,283
254,096
306,995
219,396
185,911
356,386
231,997
311,215
309,392
363,378
338,449
312,466
254,557
239,056
237,232
273,936
253,957
160,060
199,693
278,970

15,812
21,500
17,759
98,456
24,551
87,696
24,746
40,073
25,520
36,744
5,645
58,036
7,841
29,513
53,198
52,141
17,349
29,881
4,829
29,065
35,666
9,474
16,262
64,999

9.97%
7.09%
6.44%
31.97%
8.52%
34.51%
8.06%
18.27%
13.73%
10.31%
2.43%
18.65%
2.53%
8.12%
15.72%
16.69%
6.82%
12.50%
2.04%
10.61%
14.04%
5.92%
8.14%
23.30%

186,990
190,146
258,249
8,173,941

6,128
7,726
56,541
1,012,823

3.28%
4.06%
21.89%
12.39%

Population
220,338
7,375
246,270

Figure 1: 2011 Muslim religious afiliation in London boroughs


Source: 2011 Census data

16

In fact, if Islam is growing at a greater pace than Christianity there should


be more Mosque-building. However this is precisely because UK masses
and classes are more mosque-going than church-going.
The principle that because Muslim congregants exceed Christian
congregants means Mosques should be built up until there are as many as
there are churches is one of equality and freedom of worship. It assumes
only a respect of rights of Muslims in a country where we are told we have
both equal rights and freedom of worship.
Given that many London Boroughs schools are of a Muslim majority and
that congregation numbers are of greater significance in Islam as opposed
to Christianity (ie. Mosque numbers and sizes exceed church congregation
sizes), it is noted that the British people are soon to be following the
religion of Islam.
If there are 16,000 English churches, there should be 15,000 or 20,000
Mosques, otherwise there is no equal rights. There is no freedom of
worship.
If we are drawing graphs of religious worshippers with catholic, protestant
and Muslim (with Muslim equal to both combined and scheduled to
double within 1 census and quadruple within 2), surely there should be
more representation at government level, ascension to the throne and more
awareness of the facts. All of these will allow for more mosque-building,
which is clearly the desire of the people, from its youth to its elderly.

17

1.3- Religious practice


In the battle of humanity versus humanism, antiquity versus iniquity,
Islam versus Christianity; the definition of religious practice based on
those who say they are religious and that they believe in God, over
religious affiliation must prevail.
Christians conduct their own surveys showing 40% say they go to Church
but when this is surveyed only 20% actually are attending. Also many
Christian religion affiliated people deny the existence of God and say they
dont believe there is a God and that they are not religious, yet instead of
being atheist in the Census, they are down as Christians. This makes no
sense at all.
If there is one measure for religious affiliation, there are more Christians
than Muslims. If there are as well as that two measures for Religious
practice, Muslims far out-measure Christians in London and are the true
heirs to the throne of England, to the legal institutions and so on.
The analysis could go further, by asking firstly, does the respondent
believe in God Almighty? Further to this does he admit to being religious?
This would give us again, a five-fold scale to determine who is dominant.
As this is an even number it will be easy to see to which religion does each
borough belong.
The UK is now a Muslim majority country, just like France and Germany,
have maximum Muslim worshippers, it is dar al Islam. Some ullema, such
as ShafiI scholar al-Rafii included in his definition that Dar al Islam once
named as such remains Dar al Islam until the day of Judgement.
Imam Abu Hanifa is said to have founded the concept based on the gate of
Paradise, dar as salam. Dar al-Islam is also known and referred to as Dar
al-Salam, or house/abode of Peace. The term appears in the Holy Koran in
10.25 and 6.127 as a name of Paradise:
And [know that] God invites [man] unto the abode of peace, and guides him that
wills [to be guided] onto a straight way.

18

Theirs shall be an abode of peace with their Sustainer; and He shall be near unto
them in result of what they have been doing.
According to Abu Hanifa, considered to be the originator of the concept,
the two requirements for a country to be part of Dar al-Islam are:
1. Muslims must be able to enjoy peace and security with and within
this country.
2. It has common frontiers with some Muslim countries.
If the former does not apply then physical means such as Jihad can be used
to correct the situation and in the latter case, individuals are required to do
hijra to where they can practise their religion.
Other followers of Hanbali madhab have said:
There are only two, Dar al Islam and Dar al Kufr. Any Dar (domain) where
Islamic law is dominant is Dar al Islam, and any domain where Kufr law is
dominant is Dar al Kufr, there are only these two camps.
- Ibn Muflih (died 884 AH)
There is not much explanation in the Holy Quran itself, of the concept of
Dar Al Islam, nonetheless, the term is used widely by the scholars. Sayyed
Qutb, even talks of Dar al Islams opposite being Dar al Harb. Others
mention Dar al Hijra, pointing out that this began when Rasulallah (SWS)
migrated away from Mecca. As opposed to Dar al Jihad, stands Dar al
Ahd. Others have equated Dar al Islam with Dar al Muslimeen.
Types of Dar (and ways of judging a land as Muslim or not)
1. Dar al Islam Are muslim religious worshippers in the majority?
2. Dar al Harb Are Muslims struggling militarily and persevering in their
fight in the land?
3. Dar al Aman - Is there safety and security?
4. Dar al Hijra Is this a land of immigration? A land for the Muslim
Ummah to emigrate to?
5. Dar al Ahd Are covenants kept? Are human rights met?

19

6. Dar al Muslimeen Is everything from government to social welfare in


the hands of Muslims done purely for Allahs sake?
7. Dar al Kufr? Are there still kafirs?
The above defintions, concern various Islaamic concepts, Ibadat, Jihad,
Salam, Risalat, Muamalat, Islam and finally, kufr.
The British Isles are dar al Islam and not Dar al Kufr, because:
1. France and Germany enjoy maximum Muslim worshippers, and they are
the nearest to border states.
2. The Islands themselves are enjoying maximum Muslim worshippers,
over a million per week in the
places of worship.
3. The authority invested in Muslim leaders (ie Sultans) to authorise others
behaviour. Eg UN, NATO, IMF, WB etc are often conducted through the
British system in some way or another.
4. Dawah in the UK
5. High Muslim birth rates
6. Christian homosexuality and divorce
7. Immigration from Muslim countries
Maybe America, one day too, replace its Judeo-Christian ideology with a
Muslim one. Ameen. Maybe Judaism will be replaced, in the occupied
Palestine, through dawah, reproduction and immigration, of Muslims, if
not the jihad fisabilillah in the occupied Palestine.
May the conquest of the British Isles serve as a means to ameliorate the
condition of the Muslims in the rest of the world. Ameen.
It is our sincere prayer that the English language and English literature
type culture be replaced, once for all with Arabic Studies and Islamic
studies as a mode of salvation for humanitys ills. Having begun a BA
degree in Islamic Studies I know how fulfilling and indeed spiritually

20

rewarding it is to study the deen of Allah Subhanahu wa Ta Ala, instead of


the poets of the age of perversity and ignorance. May Shirk and Kufr of
these Islands be turned into the fulfillment of its majority or maximum
religion and our organised religion. Amin
Now that it is established that Islam has been present in the now-EU
countries, and if we follow Ar Rafis statement that once part of the
Muslim Ummah, a nation is always part of the Muslim Ummah, we can
draw further conclusions:
Firstly that al Andalus (Spain and Portugal) are still Muslim lands.
Secondly, that the British Islands, (where it is proved that at the seat of
power, the Muslims are the relative religious majority), too are Muslim
lands.
Boo-e Yemen Aaj bhi us ki hawaoun mein hein, Rang e Hijaz Aaj bhi us ki
nawaoun mein hein, Deda e Anjum mein hein teri Zameen, Asmaan, Aah!
Ke Sadiyaoun se hein teri fiza be Azaan
Even today in its breeze fragrance of Yemen still floats, Even today in its
songs echoes live on of Hejaz, Under the stars your realm lies like a
heaven; alas! Ages are fled since your courts heard their last prayer-call
sound.
The Mosque of Cordoba- Sir Muhammad Iqbal
The second assertion, being that London, therefore Britain is, in fact, part of
the Muslim lands, holds true due to the fact of the indigeneity of Islam in
the land. An indigenous people are those who live naturally inspite of
imposition of unnatural (if you like) government, by another people. In
this case by Brussels and Westminster (or the system, the machine, the
Vikings etc). As Muslims, our marginalisation is both historical, in the
sense of radically altering history and is conducted through the state
(although not settlers).
There is no alternative to recognition of the British Islands as part of the
Muslim empire. To do this we must reactivate an Islamic Political Party in
Britain, and begin our entrance into the political process, as the system of
tyranny founded terrorism as its politics.

21

Unfortunately, the philosophy of subversion and deviation, the path we


have been forced into practising and will only continue to do so, tells us to
hate our religion and to be submissive to other religions. This is complete
balderdash and must be discontinued immediately.
The survey at the end of this book would give a clear answer, to how many
of the London boroughs still have Christianity being practised in them
How are figures for religious affiliation and practice calculated?
Two Projections (one of five years from now and the other of 15 years in
time), would tell us very soon, half of London will enjoy mainly Muslims
as the inhabitants and not Christians.
They would be based on 2.1 birth rate for Christians and 4.25 birthrate for
Muslims. They assume a stagnant Christian population against doubling of
Muslim population. The figures for practice are, for Islam, a quarter and an
eighth for weekly and daily worship. For Christianity, 10% and 5% of
Christians are taken for average. Charts should show this with the figures
now being changed by being capped at 50% for Muslim majority boroughs.
This would have meant a boroughs domination to not been shown.
I have already mentioned that by the turn of the next century, the British
Isles will, I am sure, will be a Muslim country, with its own place in the
Ummah of Prophet Mohammad (Peace be upon Him).
The reasons for this are that London already has:
Maximum Muslim religious worshippers
London will, by 2031, the census 16 years from now:
Be a Muslim Majority.
And it will, in all probability, by the next census from then:
Have more Muslims than non-Muslims
We can put this another way: Islam has grown on the British Isles to the
point that for the children born at the beginning of this century:
1.A Muslim majority is statistically probable in their lifetime (Outright 1)

22

2. Maximum Muslim worshippers have already emerged as


dominant in London (Outright 2)
What is Outright?
1. The 1st method of outright Muslim domination
Evident, in London Boroughs such as Tower Hamlets, there are more
Muslims than Christians. In terms of religious affiliation, Muslims
outnumber all other religious groups. This concerns the census 2011
question What is your religion? or What religion do you belong to?
The next censuses will see many more of the 33 London Boroughs Muslim
majority included in this eventually is Shariah zone Walthamstow in the
borough of Waltham Forest (which as a whole has not been designated a
Shariah zone, albeit part of it was, temporarily)
2. Outright 2
By this method most of London is already Muslim and therefore as
London is a seat of power, so too are Canada, Jamaica, the Malvinas,
Australia and New Zealand (anywhere the Queen has dominion) as are the
rest of the British Isles.
For outright 2 to be successful, and it has been, religious practice is
considered as well as religious affiliation. These are the relevant questions
to which the answer determines whether a population is considered
Muslim or not:
1. To which religion do you say you belong to?
2. Are you a believer in God?
3. Do you consider yourself religious?
Outright 1 takes just the first question only into account. Outright 2 may
also look at the second and third as well as daily worship and weekly
attendance at places of worship in Britain.
Muslims have in the London population:

23

1. Maximum Muslim worshippers already


2. A Muslim majority by 2031
3. More Muslims than unbelievers by, say 2041
What wed really like to see, is the people have some sort of plebiscite for
Self Determination for Londoners who are at least by Religious Practice
and not just affiliation, Muslim. In terms of religious affiliation, the London
boroughs are maximum Muslim by 2031, but by the strict terms of
religious practice they are majority Muslim already.
We can then assume a Muslim government between 2 and 3. Further to
this, Imam Hanifas two points of security and border states, there are Ibn
Muflihs arguments. That the two, Dar al Islam and Dar al Kufr are
independent. In this case, it is not until all three points are achieved in this
country that it is Dar al Islam. This is only a difference in noting the
presence of Islam in the country between the maximum religion (now
Islam in the major cities) and the majority, or a relative majority and an
absolute majority.
Our gift to the Christians of these Islands, the British Isles is Islam, which
we intend to leave in our children and grandchildren. Further to this we
will inherit the ethnic minority or silent minority status that they have
given us, to them. The very real threat of over a hundred years of war will
bear the fruit of Britain. Only megareligiousness, not just inner and outer
religiousness can bring this about. When we are allowed to practice and
not just practise our religion. I say that knowing that in London, the seat of
all British power, religious practice as per weekly attendance of Londons
places of worship, daily congregational worship as well as peoples own
admissions in the censuses as to their own religious affiliation, has swayed
from Christian to Muslim, perhaps 15 years ago. What is described as the
outright domination of religious practice is itself a somewhat different
matter, as it is not deemed appropriate to define as Muslim, an area where
any one of, weekly worship, daily worship or specified affiliation is not
under the religion of Islam. The nearest census at this point in time is in
fact 2021, as it will be begun to be collated in five years, and so it is of
added relevance that outright religious domination belongs to the religion
of Islam for 2 of the 33 boroughs. That they have maximum Muslims as
opposed to Christians is the difference between them.

24

The philosophy of Outright method


What is the philosophy of outright domination? Outright domination is
where a part of the Muslim Ummah, a community or nation, is practising
the religion of Islam more than practitioners of any other group are
practicing their religion. A statistical method of differentiating to some
extent a religion having real and practical domination in any population
and therefore having the right to rule and govern In this country it is a cold
fact that there are more people observing the Islamic religion than
Christianity. When we write it up as a percentage sign, we see that the M%
is Islam ie. 10% in the general population are Muslim, so Islam is the
relative majority. This no doubt reminds us of the Messenger of Islam
(SWS) whose name also begins with M Prophet Mohammad (SWS).
In the battle of Islam, religion for Allah Alone, versus Christianism, we
find jahiliyya (unbelief) represents the strength of Crescent as well C%. I
say this because, given the high number of atheists, nones, those who
say they have no religion, and the high ethnic diversity of London, the real
test of our rule ie Muslim rule over non-Muslims, will be how well we treat
others and that includes people of other faiths.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from where the Blessed Prophet
Mohammad (SWS) came from, Iraq from where science came from, Ash
Sham from where honourable people came from, Iran from where much of
world religion came, Hindustan, from where the father of humanity came,
China, the richest country in the world, Egypt, from where much
scholarship is done, Turkey, from where many peoples and languages
come, Pakistan, from where is the home of Sainthood in Islam, S.E. Asia
from where there are many cultures, Mali (Timbuktu) home of spirituality,
Azerbaijan, from where scholars of ahadith come and Yemen from where
much is learned; all are falling in the Muslim Ummah, in whole or in part.
As well as Badakhsha (Afghanistan), Bukhara (Uzbekistan) and Britannia
(From where we pray Islamic economics and finance, particularly will be
given a world vision). If not by 2031, let it be, may it be, by 2041, or
thereabouts.
Allah says in the Qur'an:

25

"O believers, save yourselves and your family from the Hellfire whose fuel
is men and stones"
Surah e Tahrim, Verse 6
It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth
to manifest it over all religion. And sufficient is Allah as Witness.
THQ 48:28
A movement for the Islamic conquest of Britain will seek to answer the
question of Muslim political participation as well as rule. Why is it our
holiday is not accepted in the public holidays of the public, and yet the
matter is not in the public eye?
The reason outright domination is twofold is that people do not complain:
1. That Islamic conquest is all-of-a-sudden
2. That the Islamic conquest of UK is relative No, It is a fact!
There are scientific, or statistical reasons. So we can make it clear, that over
the last 50 years, the incremental 100 and something mosques that have
been built are just the beginning. We NEED thousands of more by twenty
years time. Otherwise we will pray in the streets! We are going to be
millions more Muslims, in London.
In 20 years from now, Eid will be (inshallah) observed 4 or 5 times more
than xmas or easter on their own. The philosophy of replacement of UK
Christianism with Islam comes with the transference of political power
from Christianism to Islam (The rise of Islam is helped by the death of
Christianity in Britain). What is interesting is that 35-40% is the percentage
of UK Muslims who are Pakistani. Surely then UK is itself subject to the
philosophy of Pakistaniat. It is itself a little Pakistan.
What is this philosophy? It is that, you know when you pick up a musical
instrument for the first time and play a wrong note? It reminds us of
somehow China or India, or we hope of American music or something?
In the enlightened miracle of Pakistan (ie in the future), without the
intervention of Pakistani popular music, that off-key chord will remind us

26

of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Wherever they may be in this world.


Nay, whoever they may be.
Like Mandarin, English, Spanish and Hindi are the most widely spoken
languages of the world, Pakistan, India, China and America will, by 2050
(inshallah) the four most populous countries in the world. So, why not?
So every drum will beat the rhythm of Pakistan and every instrument will
play to its tune....it will grow to being no smaller than America....3.9% of
the world as per United Nations Population Division, World Population
Prospects: The 1998 Revision
The philosophy of Inteqal (Transference/death/ transmission/ suicide)
Inteqal is one means by which English peoples and the English language
will be inherited to the Muslim Ummah due to the Muslim Ummahs
outright domination of human populations.
The philosophy of the method of outright domination of Islam outlines
how between now and some point in the not too distant future, Muslims
aim to come to power over Christians in the UK.
I have shown convincingly that due to their being more worship (ibadah)
in the religion of Islam as compared to Christianity, there is more
opportunity for doing worship (ibadah). And because of there being more
opportunity for doing worship in the religion of Islam than in
Christianism, there are more Muslims in the places of worship in the UK,
than Christians, today, on a daily basis or on a weekly basis.
The crucial fact here is simply that if a congregational prayer takes place in
a place of worship in London:
1. On any given day there will be more Muslims in Muslim places of
worship than Christians in Christian places of worship.
2. In any given week there will be the same above situation and we can
assume (given two religious holidays each) the same for any given
religious holiday.

27

3.More Muslims will be recorded in the next census after the coming one,
than Christians.
Admittedly, situation 3 is one which is still not an absolute majority and so
the Monarchy and the legal institutions remain in the hands of the enemy.
Nonetheless it has been situation 1 for over a decade now, and situation 2
has recently come true.
What we now await is a situation 4:
4. More Muslims than Non-Muslims in the UK seat of power (London).
We expect this to happen by the next census afterwards (ie 2051).
Is one whose heart Allah has opened to Islam, so that he has received
Enlightenment from Allah, (no better than one hard-hearted)? Woe to those whose
hearts are hardened against celebrating the praises of Allah. they are manifestly
wandering (in error)!
The Holy Quran 39:22
Unfortunately the wicked Christians of these Islands have been falsely
claiming that they are children of Abraham, when a cursory look at the
Bible reveals Abraham came from Iraq originally so his progeny are the
Iraqis. The progeny of his childrens were settled in Palestine, so their
children were Palestinians.
On what grounds do these unholy warmongers, America, Britain and
Israel lay claim to Abraham (PBUH) as their father we might ask? That
they, instead of honouring the poor of the respected countries, talk of war
instead of peaceful or Islamic reasons for their and anyone elses honour.
This has got to stop!
In fact when we look at how the world has suffered in the modern world it
is due largely to the menace of Judeo-Christianity and its need for
committing genocide.
Judeo- Christianity is part of history, a legacy, it is of no use. Let us be
merciful and not vengeful by committing genocide the way they do. Let us

28

allow UKs Christians to commit political suicide in front of our very eyes
on our British Isles. Our by virtue of our being the conquering generation.
Allah ta Ala tells us in the Holy Quran:
"Those who believe, and whose hearts find satisfaction in the remembrance of
Allah. for without doubt in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find satisfaction.
The Holy Quran Surah Ar Rad Verse 28
Inteqaliat (transference or transition) of UK power from Christian to
Muslim hands
Given that a Muslims life and property are a sacred trust in every other
Muslims hands, Christians are wrongfully assuming the right of life over
the Muslim Jesus. For this reason they are all committing a major sin and
are like murderers or far worse.
For this reason, we as Muslims must:
1. Take the power they have back for ourselves
2. Fight them and their forces with our full effort
3. Realise that a rush and a push and the land that we stand on is ours.
Once we are just and mujahideen in the cause of Allah Almighty, we need
to adopt a certain effort to have a strategy or policy, whereby we accept
that regarding the UK and the British throne, we are nearly there, and
regarding political power in the houses of parliament and the houses of
Lords, we are getting there.

29

1.4 Religious affiliation


How many East London boroughs have more Muslim children, and we
can infer more Muslim births than Christian, for example? However as
around 19% at that age are Muslim, compared to around 15% overall, there
is a higher ratio of Muslim to Non-Muslim than if we measure the overall
population.
Although 6 boroughs have for the last 4 years had more births to Christian
families, one has had more to Muslim families. The greatest religious
majority in any single London borough is 56%, in Tower Hamlets, a
Muslim majority. This evidence from local area authorities suggest to me
that my child and other Muslim children attending schools in the area are
by no means a minority or an exception to the rule. The statistics give us a
sample of the children who begin school in the various boroughs of
London as Muslim or Christian. It also tells us of the last four years births,
are they to, more Christians or Muslim families, approximately. Perhaps it
is better to compare the Muslim faith with non-Muslim religions
collectively. Noting the fact of Islams populations surge by 2% (from
census records) and other religions fall in numbers, we can gauge the
matter has historical implications for the Islamic liberation of the United
Kingdom. Indeed the question is not one of percentages Muslim or
Christian but one of the countries of the UK, also the home countries of the
UK, Muslim or Christian?
We look at the above data for a historical answer, sociologically (due to the
dominance of Islam in the world), biologically (due to the demise of nonMuslims), but the answer is history. If the view of anthropology is taken
that the crucial difference is one of culture of the people, then surely it is
not the name Jack, that is most popular and most chosen but the name
Muhammad. Indeed, it is not the union jack Sir, but the Unity of Divinity
taught by the last Messenger of Allah ta Ala, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH),
which is the guiding light for the religion of this country, this land, for 1015 years now. For my generation, for this generation. For generations to
come, Inshallah azawajal.

30

1.5 20, 40 (A philosophy for the future)


Muslim majority rule in the UK
We are living and breathing in the 2010's. The next decade is the 2020's,
then the 2030's.
According to my calculations for London and England (which already
practice Islam, although more profess Christianity outwardly) the UK will
be, by the 2040's majorly or majority Muslim. London, Birmingham, Luton,
Leicester, Bradford and such like already have more Muslims than
Christians as per religion. Soon, Manchester, Liverpool, Edinburgh,
Cardiff, Dublin and Belfast and so on too will have in a couple of decades
time. This is due largely to the so-called "non-replacement" of British and
European families and Muslim families contrasting (much higher) family
sizes. So where are our political parties? Why are there anti-Muslim parties
in parliament? Where our hundreds of members of the houses of
parliament? Where is our representation in the media? Our Muslim
English newspapers? What will, no doubt start in 2040, when tens of
millions will begin to try and institute our rules in these islands is
beginning to crystallise as a vision in the minds of our children. The
present respected Muslim peoples, the silent majority, in the parameters of
religious action, of 3-4 million will soon grow to 10 million. If, by 2040, it
should double we will be able to rule the violent minority, christians being
technically the minority as per religious practice.
Replacement theory -Biological and religious
Replacement theory tells us that the Muslim peoples of the UK must, due
to the biological self-replacement of lineages (ie the sociological effect of
reproduction and higher fertility rates) as well as the religious desires of
the Muttaqun (the pious) to eliminate cultural Islam and create a pure
Islamic culture, succeed, in defeating:
The so-called "British" empire
So-called "American" exceptionalism
"White supremacy"
Racist Christianism
Colonial and neo-colonial oppression

31

If we are to defeat the motif of Islamophobia, rooted as it is in the drive to


war against every Muslim country over the past 100 years, we, as residents
of these Islands we should realise not just that our past, present and future
depends on our Islamic identity but that our children, who are named,
more than any other name, Mohammad, the name of the Prophet of Allah
(SWS) and of the religion of Al Islam, are growing up witnessing these
same atrocities carried out or supported by us in the name of, basically our
own ignorance.
The indigenity of the respected Muslim peoples of the general
population of the UK
Generally, followers of religion in the major cities of UK (if a sample is
drawn from the general public of, for example London) are Muslim. As a
complementary point, worshippers or religious worshippers in UK
countries are generally Muslim, that is the indigenous religion in England
is Al Islam.
2040 Future religion
The principle of 20/40%
A population of only 10% of a nation can double and redouble upon which
it would nearly succeed in becoming a majority.
The philosophy of 20/40 (Absolute majority)
Countries are either Dar al Islam or not. If 20 of 40 people are Muslim it
rules out there being any other religion which should rule.
The rule of Islam by 2040
By 2040 many countries with at present 20 % of our population being
Muslim will face their majority turning into a Muslim majority in the
country eg UK, France, Germany, Israel, Spain, India. 40% may represent a
relative majority only, but assuming other ethnicities constitute 20% it is an
unsurpassable majority, so the countries are Dar al Islam by virtue of not
not being so. These and other similar countries will find by 2040 they will
be, unless they can match Muslim fertility rates, be ruled by Muslims.
20 to 40 million Muslims in the lands

32

Some commentators estimate the true Muslim population of the UK to be


10 million at the present, it would then have to only double to become 20
million. Then should it double Muslims will outnumber everyone else.
20 if not 40%
Outright 2 is where all three criteria for religion are met and outright 1 is
where only the official definition is fulfilled. By these definitions, 1 and 2,
only Tower Hamlets in 2011, Tower Hamlets, Newham and Redbridge in
2021 (inshallah), and Waltham forest and others too by 2031 inshallah,
have outright definition. And that is in the Islamic faith.
We therefore demand better representation for Muslims in the houses of
parliament, more honorific titles bestowed upon us as nobility, as well as
legislation to be passed by the Queen of England, legalising our right to
ascension to the throne.
What this proves is that the UK countries are not non- Muslim countries in
the sense of being Christian countries, but rather (given a minority of
people are Christian), they are yet to be Muslim majority countries (albeit
in non-Muslim lands).
20, 40 teaches us that if in London Muslim births are some 20% of all births,
and Christians are only 40something % in the land anyways, Islam has the
upper hand biologically.

33

Chapter 2 - The Religion of Islam in the UK and the USA


2.1 Outright

50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

Islam
Christianity

2020

2040

2060

2080

Figure 2: The possible overtaking of Islam over all religions in America


(outright 2- Muslim congregants are shown in millions against
Christian)
Outright 1: Muslim majority by religion or religious affiliation.
Outright 2: Muslim maximum (daily observance and weekly
attendance)
The religious practicability of Londoners has clearly swayed from
Christian to Muslim. Not only is there a Muslim majority where a
Christian majority is impossible but soon we will have a Muslim land
where a Christian land will be impossible.

34

The Christians will soon be living in quasi-Bantustans in cities like London.


So whereas today Redbridge, Tower Hamlets, Waltham Forest and
Hackney form the East London Muslim Crescent, soon, assuming West
London and North London only are dominated by Islam, Christians will
live in the Bantustan of South London in London as a whole. South of the
River Thames being the only place where they are still in the majority.
Whereas today the white British ethnic minority applies only in London,
Slough, Leicester and Luton; tomorrow Bradford, Birmingham, Sheffield
and other cities will see more people, for example from the Indo-Pak subcontinent (by their roots) than white.
Therefore Hindi-Urdu will become the lingua franca and Anglicanism will
remain as it has this century or even this millennium, the occupying faith
of the violent minority throughout Britain and its dominion. English as a
language becomes the lingua franca of the capitalist or democratic
movement in India.
However what is vital here is that in Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Virgin
Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands and the West Indies, and on the
British Isles themselves (anywhere considered part of Britain) we have
witnessed Islam take over Christianity as the practicable religion of the
people. It can realistically never win back the status of the religion of the
UK.
Muslims are a religious grouping and we pray our eemaan never weakens.
Ameen.
The Islamic revolution in Britain is clearly threefold:
1. Maximum
2. Majority
3. Muslim
The millions of this Ummah are, in Urdu or Persian:
1. Jamhour (The majority)

35

2. Jamhouri (Democratic)
3. Jamhouriat (Persian for republic)
What is clear from the sources of Islaamic law is that democracy is not so
much a trickle-down from ijma, or consensual opinion of scholars, but that
it is from the very idea of dar al islam. In other words the ideas of
democracy and republic come from the ideas of:
1. Muslim countries
2. Muslim majority nations
Jamhour itself means majority or democracy. Therefore, The Islamic
Republic of Great Britain, is Britain as we now know it, where the majority
practice Islam and the only democratic ideology is one of the Muslims,
Islam.
Interestingly, the right and left wing of American politics too, democratism
and republicanism, stem from these concepts of democracy and before that
majority.
Perhaps there is a lack of education about the meaning of, or the
significance of having a Muslim majority. Indeed Great Britain having a
Muslim majority implies it is an Islamic (Democratic) Republic. This
Islamic Democratic Republicanism is logically possible because of the
majority Muslim demography.
Legislation is only from Allah and His Messenger (PBUH). There is no
legislation that is not for Allah and His Messenger (PBUH). If the ideology
of the British republic and democracy is pressed it therefore cannot yield to
monarchy or anarchy. The religion of Islam informs us of the superiority of
Muslims and Muslim rule over non-Muslims (who have no right to rule).
Officially, in the capital, London, the white British of the British Isles are
now a minority. The label of Black and minority ethnicity then applies no
longer. It is a majority (Islam) who are dominant.

36

Having acknowledged London as the seat of power of Britain, we conclude


Britain is already something like an Islamic democratic republic of Britain.
The moral majority of the British Isles have automatically replaced the
violent Christian minority and from now on our rules are going.
They tried to implement democracy at gunpoint in Iraq and Afghanistan
and not only killed thousands of thousands of people but created multiholocaust in their foreign wars. Now through peace and the hope of peace,
we see Great Britain is now something like an Islamic Democratic Republic
of Britain.
Islamic democratic republic for the future, what a great idea! Islamic
Democratic Republic of UK in the future, what a wonderful thing! The
thousands of adherents of the church of England, the abolished religion of
the British Isles do not come near, do not compare to the millions of
Muslims, God-fearing and coming from proper practising families not
broken homes, who seek only to defend the faith of God from being
attacked and to prevent blasphemy and calumny of our faith. Where is the
sense in upholding the 800-year old Magna Carta (so-called grand
charter) when the people have long abolished the religion?
Where are our childrens Muslim English newspapers, Muslim schools,
Islamic universities, mosques, madrassas and Islamic legislature (ie. Full
implementation of Islamic shariah and law after abolishment of the
church) going to come from?
Egyptian economist, Professor Samir Amin has gone on record as saying
the world needs a new (Communist) International. Let me say, I think
communism is an alternative to capitalism but what the world needs from
Britons is a new nation! We need more than a new newspaper or two that
addresses the concerns of the Muslim population, strives to create an
environment where Muslim schooling and Islamic universities are
acceptable in the eyes of all, and will represent the dominant religion of
Britain.

37

The religiously affiliated, daily and weekly practitioners of religions in


London, especially and the UK and dominion generally are now swinging
towards Islam. Within twenty years the white British will be replaced by
Pakistani Muslims. The very same people who claim to rule us, the white
British are now becoming an ethnic minority in their own definition.
Pakistani Muslims are now the new, replacement majority, religious
majority, religion etc. Why? The white British are a racial category or an
ethnic group (occupiers), whereas Muslim Pakistanis are a modern
religious current or tradition. The Muslim country is ruled by justice and
equity of Islam and so is associated with a democracy, devoid of any tyrant
or despotic ruler, whereas the Muslim majority nation is like a democratic`
republic, where other spheres of political influence still exist such as
political parties, though the word of Allah has not necessarily become
dominant just yet.
England, the place where the rules of the games of football, cricket and
hockey were written, and sportsmanship was written into the fabric of
modern life, now lies with more Muslim worshippers than Christian.
When will the Queen of England be a good sport, abdicate, and take her
legal institutions and courts with her?
We, as Muslims will not be happy unless and until we are free to not
merely practise but to practice our religion in this country. The
acceptability of religion is not that it is all acceptable but that it is all. If
there are, at present between 4 and 5 million Catholics in the UK today and
between 3 and 4 million Muslims, it will not be long before there are more
Muslims than Catholics in Britain.
Further, British authorities will have to admit the UK is not a Christian but
a Muslim country, starting with the NOMIS (National Office for
Manpower Information System, Office for National Statistics, UK).
In other words, it is a former Christian country, and it is basically (yet) to
become a Muslim country. It may well be the next UK census will show
more Muslims than Catholics by affiliation and more Muslims than all
Christians by practice and therefore will cede governance to Muslim

38

hands, upon the Queens abdication. As head of the failed Church surely
this is her responsibility, to ensure replacement takes place. These three
terms express Islams need to take over the British Isles. No one should
ignore the desire of all for the transference of sovereignty of UK from
Christian to Muslim hands.
Indeed a political change is taking place in favour of Muslims in Britain.
This is a transfer of power and this we call transference. It is not simply
practicability, where there is an admission en masse of the overall
ascendance of Islam and Muslims over other religions (which is pertinent
to the future of this and other European countries). Nor is it a merely
biological view of Islam and Christianity.
As a community here in the UK, we must stop trying to be relevant by
saying either that we are a culture or a civilisation, ie. an ethnicity or ethnic
minority or that we are a religion which is older than Judaism or
Christianity. We are neither a culture as opposed to nature nor a minority
as opposed to a majority. Indeed we will struggle to put forward an
argument that we are trying to in some circles where we are saying directly
to the ahl e kitab that no you are not ahl e qitaal, you are ahl e dhimmi. We
are risking an air of conceit, superiority and illness of temperance should
we do this.
We have a very real chance here of obliterating the British empire, the
Roman empires main child, after America, in modern international
politics. Nevertheless we must see our hand is better than theirs. We must
acknowledge they are not our slaves, neither will they ever be. But they are
our beggars. Our equals in humanity who WILL bequeath the right to rule
as a religion over Britain and its dominion.
We will not invade Britain in a military sense. But in a society where there
is ongoing political transference (where the big players, be they white,
British or Christian) in the political lives of Muslims who by every right
desire the power, economic power or coming to power. We Muslims must
accept that we should expect more power.

39

We must refuse marginalisation at the hands our equals in humanity, or


from other religious or ethnic groups, rather than from our enemies, from
whom, we cannot continue to suffer. We do not really have to demand that
the Queen embrace Islam or that Jews, Christians are converted slowly.
What we need to do, generally, is accept that our community here lacks
education, lacks women in the workforce, lacks good skilled labour in the
right jobs. To come to power in Britain for the British Muslim is nothing.
Here in our faith, deen e Islam we must continually come to prayer and
come to success!
The key issue of transference is, are we considering ourselves an internal
conceptualisation of religious values and of faith or do we, have a sense of
otherness in society? What I mean by this is not just are we dominant or is
someone else? But rather do we take a political rise for granted as opposed
to considering it as given to us by other powers?

Figure 3: Maximum Muslim England

40

Capacity of Masjid

Number of
Masjids

Number of congregants

Less than 50 people


35
1,750
50 to 100 people
200
40,000
101 to 200 people
236
94,400
201 to 300 people
224
134,400
301 to 400 people
129
103,200
401 to 500 people
116
116,000
501 to 750 people
139
104,250
751 to 1000 people
106
106,000
1001 to 2000 people
121
242,000
2000 to 4000 people
49
196,000
Greater than 4000 people
10
80,000
Not yet recorded
216
108,000
Total
1,324,270
Figure 4 : Unlike Christians, Muslims have in the UK, millions of
congregants per week
Indeed our rise is granted us by Allah Almighty. Why? The fall of
Christianity is spelt out in the collapse of capitalism and the capitalist
system. Christianity has committed suicide, terrorist trinitarianism has killed
itself.
Once we respect, for example, the Taliban, we will have respect for, indeed
have the utmost respect for the religion of Islam. The religion given to us
people as Al Islam is the reason to have respect. Today the English are
recognising this power and trying to fight it across the world. They cant,
they are hereby made homeless on the Islands from which they ruled of
the planets lands.
Now we must recognise this, our power lies in their admission of guilt. Their
suicide is simply blaming themselves for their war, genocide and terrorism.
To get them to do this we must make them feel our pain.
The Italian peoples, in the Roman empire; the Greek peoples in the ancient

41

Greeks, the Spanish and Portugese etc. in the Muslim Spain and the English
in the British empire, were all European or Western barbarians in history.
They all achieved an impact on history and were indeed a force on other
peoples.
It is the Muslim outright domination of this last group or ethnicity, ie. the
emerging statistical religious majority of Muslims here in Britain which is of
such great significance as it is the only means by which, where historically
only the Muslims of London were granted Dar al Islam, now all of these
groups, all of Europe and indeed all of the world can come into the fold of
Islam.
At present European Islam is largely in the Balkan areas of the various dar
al Islam countries of Bosnia, Kosovo and Albania, already mentioned. This
historical analysis then says, should it move into Spain, UK, Italy and
Greece, it will truly be a force to be reckoned with. In fact, if Britain should
be conquered, given Spain is still Muslim in the sense of dar al Islam, only
the barbaric tribes of the Romans and Greeks would remain as a historic
force in Europe and the West.

42

2.2 Baby Names


Regions within England and Wales and most popular name for that region.
Region

Name

North East
Jack
North West
Harry
Yorkshire and The Humber Harry
East Midlands
Harry
West Midlands
Harry
East
Harry
London
Muhammad
South East
Harry
South West
Harry
Wales
Jacob
Figure 5: Most popular name by region 2012
Source: Office for National Statistics
There must be a ceding of power where schools are taught why, for
example Muhammad is our (as Britons) most popular name. This is
replacement theory. A theory of the actual and unexpected precedence and
supercession of the religion of Islam on Judeo- Christian heritage of Europe
and America, non-Muslim ruled lands. It is a biological view of Islam
overcoming Christianity.
We have a sort of democracy, we know how practical Islam is in our lives,
now we must believe in practicability. By practicability, I mean the
relevance of Islam in the West and that it is the only religion that can be
implemented fully. In other words that beyond Zahir (overt religion) and
Batin (esotericism) is something else that cannot be achieved outside of the
religion. Another word for megareligiousity. You can call it the unofficial
religion, or the religion in practice.

43

In din, when you are on the road, you must believe in freedom for
Palestine, not in Israel. In practice, in Pakistan not in Great Britain; in Urdu
not in English. Ultimately in the Holy Quran to read not in the Bible. In
ourselves as Muslims not in Christians. Indeed, we must believe in India
not America. We must accept our fard (duty) as Muslims not just talk about
Islam, religion and domination.
Briefly, the Ummah in Britain has an identity which is like a political party
with no doubt a power of lobby and veto. We believe in a scholarly
consultation and concensus through the Shariah and the Holy books.
Muslims are freedom fighters and unitarianists. Not terrorists or
trinitarianists.
At the moment, democratism is associated with dar al Islam, whereas if we
consider the potential we have for swamping the Western base of electoral
voters, it should be a little more right wing. In fact it is this view that
Britain brings with it our Islam, our Holy book, our Divine Sources, that is
the problem. We must return to being Muslim even if that means being
conservative or republican or basically fighting our way out. We must
learn to neglect our society if we can still manage to remember the present,
past and future governments and kingdoms on earth are only made by the
heavenly people. Half of the people of heaven will be from Ummah of the
Prophet (SWS). This tells us how being an Ummati of the Prophet (SWS) is
the right way to be.
To reiterate, our politics advocates Islamic socialism, much like the
Pakistan Muslim League (PML) in Pakistan. This may lead to a struggle
with enemies and we may claim to have earnt a hard fought victory from
the fight. Nevertheless, we must advocate a pure, unadulterated Islam. Not
a version of it, Not a vision of it, not a social form of it, and not a
utilitisation of it nor a utilisation of it will be acceptable let alone the halfway house we see today; a utilitarian Islam, immersed in science to the
neglect of religion, art to the neglect of The Creator, faith to the neglect of,
and this is the real reason Islam is coming to overpower all other faiths,
religious practice. Islam is a very practical religion. It is also the real

44

religion or the practised or most practised religion. Without this admission


there is no allowance for the mutuality of personal, social, community,
familial elements of religious life in practice. Each person is a believer but
do we admit to any sort of religiousness in our life?
Religion can be important in just about anyones life but do we come from
a religious family? And if we are from such a family, do we practise what
we preach? In London, Muslims will rule Christians, in America, Muslims
will rule Christians. Why? In London, Muhammad is the most popular
name for baby boys, and even in America, there may be a hundred million
plus Christians by name, but there is no relationship between them, their
parents, their hearts and the church. Niether are they political, they are
dead in the heart. Islam in the USA, on the other hand is a Dawud to the
Jalut, a Musa to the Pharawn, increasingly they are healthy, wealthy and
wise and as such, because of the interplay in Islam between family, society,
culture and so on, they will outnumber, overpower, and indeed
outmanoeuvre Christians very quickly. This spells the death of JudeoChristian ethics in USA in this century or we could even say this or the
next generation. Why? Let me explain...........

45

2.3 The Filter A model

Ethics

Christianity

Too many single-parent families

Few church-goers on Sundays

Fewer daily practitioners


as believers in God

Few define themselves as religious

Few define themselves

Figure 6:
Filter 1: Left-side showing religious practice of families and right-side
showing surveyed humanist measures

The above filter shows how not only is Christianity failing in America but
the faith has very little faith in its roots. The left side shows how it is
impracticable for the future and the right how it is faithless and irreligious.
Together the two sides give four more dimensions to religion other than
plain affiliation. We could decide which religion the person is by affiliation
but these measures show also how much the religion is practised and also
how much that person really believes or how religious the person is.

46

The next diagram shows instead of the left and right filters, the primary
and secondary filters. Left and right show how religious practice and belief
systems are interwoven. Only if you have a right side (ie beliefs, attitudes,
values etc) can you rely on the left side. In Filter 2, the primary filter shows
religion and ethics become ultimately religious practice whereas the
secondary filter has the middle intersection, pictured below giving us
religious praxis.
Ethics

Christianity

Few church-goers on Sundays

Single-parent families

Dont define themselves as religious

Dont define themselves as believers in God


Figure 7:
Filter 2: Two distinct stages. Firstly the incorporation of ethics in
American life as philosophically from Christianity although practice may
be different; and secondly, the three stages of secondary filter or 2020
vision (or 2040 or 2060), which prove America is a Muslim country

47

This is the vision for 2020, the 2020 vision, or 2040 or 2060. That, in Britain,
France, Germany, America etc, Islam will overtake and replace Christianity
as the religion of the masses, the ethical praxis for life in the west.

48

2.4 The religion of Islam in America


(and the reproductive religious believers practitioners ratio)

Religious

Believer

Dualparent

Figure 8: American Judeo-Christianism- hundreds of millions of people


who are as of yet unconnected to anything.

What we are concerned about is the movement from religious relative


minority to majority. It all comes down to the notion of praxis. When a
people have a lot going on between themselves, their family, their society,
their language and their culture that is from their religion, you have a
religious praxis.
Religion then becomes ingrained in the very fabric of life: in the individual,
the family, the society, the language, the culture and thus is born
civilisation. If we look at the practice of the middle section or intersection
as above who are praying ie. attending a place of worship weekly, we find
even in America, more Muslim families are, as compared to Christian
families.

49

Religious
Believer Dualparent

Figure 9: Islam in the USA- mere millions of people, heavily interactive at


the personal, social, political, religious levels.
Notice how close the middle bubble in diagram 2 is in size to diagram 1.
The day is coming it will grow bigger. In 2015 there are over 6 million
Muslims in America. In the next time of counting after say 10 years, thats
around 2% of the total population, officially more Muslims recorded in
America than Jews.
Of the religious, believing, practising American dual-parent families, more
are Muslim than any other faith. My proof? The ratio is calculated first as a
type of productivity or specifically reproductivity ratio. In its own way,
the religious belivers ratio shows that of 50% of Americans who are
Christian, only 3% answer yes to the following questions as opposed to 4%
being Muslims:
1. Do you believe in God?
2. Are you religious?
3. Do you attend a place of worship on a weekly basis?
4. Did both your parents bring you up?

50

Religious

Dual-parent
families

Believer
In God

Figure 10: Americans may have big circles as above but there is an
insignificant intersection between faith, religion, family life and of course,
practice.
This tells us eventually Muslims will be in the majority as it gives a good
idea as to the trend of how the situation will change in the future.
This reveals the reproductive, believing, religious, practitioners of religions
in America are more often Muslim than not. Islam then is a sort of
maximum if not a majority.
Americas demise.....
2015 is indeed a year in which the UN agencies admit China may well have
overtaken America in the size of its economy. Nevertheless, the habits of
the Irish are a good example of the failings of the established church in
Britain, which applies well to moral and ethical life in America. In the

51

seventies, in Ireland, 90% of the people were Christian, 90% of whom were
regularly church-going.
Now, 40 years later only 25% of Ireland go to church this Sunday. USA
shows a similar low attendance.

Religious

Believer

Dualparent

Figure 11: The middle intersection of American Christians- 10 m.

Religious
Believer Dualparent

Figure 12: The middle intersection of Muslim Americans- 11 m.

52

I dont prophesise a new Israel in the Islam of the USA, rather a new
America. With only 5% or 10% nationals as Muslims, all of whom are
devout, faithful, mosque-going (or at least are or will be), and most
important of all, from stable families, America will be more Muslim than
Jewish or Christian.
American politics is relevant to here in the UK as well. Republicanism, the
right-wing, described as neo-conservative, responsible for enforcing war
on the blessed poor across the world tells us it is enforcing democracy.
Given that the left-wing of American politics informed them to continue
warring, successive governments of Obama have failed to fulfil promises
to end their false-flag wars.
The Muslim peoples of USA can be a Muslim majority, associated with the
political right; or a Muslim country, associated with the political left, in the
eyes of the very same crusaders.
It is not the conservatism that Mr Bush, enemy of the respected people of
the land of Prophet Abrahams birth, shoved down our throats. Rather it is
the democratism which is nearer, for now to what is Islamic. Wherever
Muslims live in the world, first we must do away with the Tony Blairs and
Barack Obamas then live according to Shariah. Having done that, it may
become important for us to denounce, in the UK, the Queen and the
institution of royalty, and only then can we become a Muslim country
where the word of God is utmost. Foremost is that the political will of the
respected peoples is carried out.
As for the accusation that Muslims are fanatical terrorists, in the last
century, only Christians had the monopoly on Fascism, Nazism (and
indeed Communism). Terrorists were born in Ireland we all know. As
Muslims we dont ask for democracy to be given to us on a plate nor for
the Queen to abdicate, rather we are associated with left-wing political
views. Indeed the whole argument only gives precedence to the fact that
should we become majority what would we do with the legal institutions if
we were right-wing or conservative?

53

Democracy is a Muslim invention. Many scholars have said democracy


comes from the Ijma or consensus form of Islamic legislation.
Personally, and given the increased use of Islam as a legal religion in the
west, I say the notion of voting in the team with the most support comes
from dar al Islam itself (like when there are more Muslims in a land than
non-muslims) or Muslim majority.
I say this because having read Aflatoon (Plato) and Arastu (Aristotle) etc.
there is no mention of democracy only republics.
So Democratism and democracy, which sound similar to dar al islam, come
from either:
1. Shaoorahum fil amri mentioned in the Quran as relevant when
there are hypocrites to be dealt with, it is necessary to know how to
take advise and counsel in ones matters whether one is a person,
community or a state, as in the need for the Prophet (PBUH) to take
advice in matters dealing with the munafiqun and their jihad.
2. The concept of Dar al Islam where a country is deemed Muslim
such as Muslim Spain, Portugal, Germany, Italy, Southern France
(Iberia together) and we should not just think ruled by Muslims for
almost a thousand years but actually enjoyed Muslim majority and
Muslim government whilst including Jewish and Christian people.
3. Ijma The scholarly source of Islamic legislature, in communal
consensus, which along with the Quran and sunnah, and qiyas or
analogical reasoning; form the sources of the Divine Shareeah.

Islam is the main religion for America


I hold the claim that Americans are without a culture, a religion or a
language of their own. This invites the question as to how the neoconservative lobby in the USA manages to kill hundreds of thousands of

54

innocent people in different countries of the world and get away with it,
and no one seems to want to do anything about it.
What needs to be said from here is that what prevails in America is in fact,
a perversion of Muslim culture. Like slavery.
The filter shows how, because half of the populous is lost in each stage of
the filter for Christianity, it is actually a great big lie. 40 something percent
will say that they attend their Church regularly when the attendance
doesnt figure- only half of that are at Church according to their figures in
the week.
Thus 50%, becomes 25% are practising weekly, which becomes 12.5% are
from nuclear families, which becomes 6.25% are considered believers,
which becomes 3.125% are considered religious. So only 10m are in fact
considered religious believers from regularly practising families (should
the overall US population reach 350 m and the figures dont deteriorate).
For Muslims, almost all (In fact 80%) are going through the filter. At each
stage, if 7 million in 2001 becomes 14 million for 2014, should this double
again, about 11m are in fact considered religious believers from regularly
practising families.
When will Americans practise the religion of Islam more than Christianity?
It can be expected of areas like Illinois, Florida, California or New Jersey to
have as many more practitioners in the Islamic faith than any other by
2020, but what about for America as a whole?
Well if the Muslim population doubles and redoubles it would mean
mosque numbers would have to be ten times as big. In such a situation, for
Islam to have more faithful in America, they would need to double
congregations, with mosques offering two or more services at each prayer.
This could be as soon as in our lifetimes. With the spread of secularism
across Europe likely to contaminate the figures for the states, Islam is most
likely to take over Christianity in this generation. The 50 million Sunday
worshippers could be replaced by Friday worshippers, as Christian

55

worship is likely to fall in number, perhaps even halve, whereas the


millions of Muslims who go to Mosque in America on Friday will only rise
to many more millions.
This will mean for Islam to be a relative majority religion in America, the
many hundreds of thousands of churches in America will need to be
succeeded by the building of tens of thousands of Mosques. Mosque
numbers themselves double every 10-20 years as well.
For now the praxis of religious and ethical life in America will go from
Christian to Muslim, and it is only a matter of time before the official
statistics show more Muslim adherents (congregants) in the USA than
Christian. It will happen in this generation, or the very next generation.
Sometimes, what we all want to know, and a question that we all ask at
one time or another, is Why are Americans so disconnected to morality
and ethical understanding?. The answer is in fact, quite simple. The Holy
Quran is in all fact the Holy Book we should all read instead of the Bible. It
is the instruction manual for life as we know it. Basically to answer this
point we need to understand ethics in the USA comes from so-called
Christianity. For those of us who believe the future religion and ethics is
Islam and that in actual factual, heavenly guidance is to be found in The
Holy Quran, we may call this Christianism or whatever.
The fact is that in the States, although many claim to attend churches, there
are in actual fact very few church-goers now. Another reason for moral
decay is that there are no families anymore due to single-parent families
becoming the norm. Another reason is these people dont define
themselves even as religious. Lastly, if they do attend a church, come
from a dual-parent family and claim to be religious, they dont themselves
define themselves as believing in God.
The Holy Quran says, O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in
your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the
son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He
directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe

56

in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better
for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To
Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And
sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs. (The Holy Quran 4:171)
These points show two distinct stages. Firstly the incorporation of ethics in
American life as philosophically from Christianism although, in practice it
may be different. Secondly, the three points of the chasm between the
claims (the lies) and the facts (the truth) prove, in their economic, social
and political implications that America is to be a Muslim country.
Briefly the two angles I mentioned are indicative of praxis. What is praxis?
How is it different from lay ethics or general psychology? Can American
christianism based in non-catholicism be transferred into and replaced by
militant, political and intellectual Islam. Yes, in a matter of decades.
The idea of praxis is a concept which says that well, if the US army or
armed forces do XYZ and the church says its wrong, it is deemed wrong
but nothing will happen of it unless and until it is not prevented from
materialising into action. Unless the ethics is action, there is no praxis.
Let me explain. Modern USA has a shelf life, a sell-by date: 2080. The UK
will be relatively majority Muslim by 2060. The USA too, similarly, will
have more mosque-goers than non-catholic church-goers by 2080.
Why??
Non-reproductiveness.
We all say Americanism is destructive, obsessed with consumerism, no
longer the worlds biggest production power-house. Now? America is
home to non-reproduction. No, its not to do with the inequality of
distribution or economic resource allocation on its own. Its a simple fact,
they are either:
Gay
Divorced

57

Porn addicts
Premaritally sexually active
Celibate
Paedophiles
Adulterous
Use birth control
Etc.
When it comes to the ethics of reproduction and reproductive biology, it
can be seen that knowing which religious grouping is sexually
reproductive is something like knowing which religious group will
ultimately survive over the other.
The units of the human being as an organism tell us increasingly more
about the members of the human race: The family, the individual and the
religious grouping or circle. The greater the overlap, the higher the chance
of ultimate survival. The first question is one of reproductive biology, the
second is one of religiousness and the third is one of religious faith in a
Supreme Being. All of these point to one question, who actually practises
more? If our national religious holiday is equated with figures for
affiliation, we can see Muslim or Christian is in a sense, a question of Eid
or Christmas. In Londonistan, Christianism is mere culture as outright 1
and 2, are more in the religion of Islam in the UK, very soon.
Ethics comes from revelatory ethics and from ethics we derive law.
However the Holy Book of Divine guidance for Americans by 2080 will be
the Holy book of The Holy Quran, Gods last revelation to humanity,
revealed to Prophet Muhammad (SWS) and not the Bible....

58

2.5 The future statistical convergence of Muslim and Christian


populations in UK and USA

Figure 13: Muslim majority UK in non-Muslim ruled land

80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

Islam
Christian
Total

Figure 14: The statistical overtaking of Islam over all religions in UK in


2061 (in millions)

59

Figure 15: Muslim majority America in non-Muslim ruled land

50
40
30

Islam

20

Christianity

10
0
2020

2040

2060

2080

Figure 16: The statistical overtaking of Islam over all religions in America
in 2060 (in millions). Assuming Christians excludes Catholics and
adherents are measured by number of congregants.

It is probable the next census will reveal more practising Muslims than
Christians in the UK. Further it is possible by 2041 or 2051 the census will
show more lay Muslims than lay Christians. I am assuming the Muslim
population continues its trend over the last three censuses to double, again.

60

Thus we can prove mathematically a sequence of transference and


replacement of the religion of USA and UK into an eventual Dar al Islam in
UK and a religious majority in USA:
TIMELINE OF PROGRESSION
2nd religion or minority
20012011- average daily practitioners
now
2021- average weekly practitioners and annual congregants (estimate)
2031204120512061- 1st Religion or majority (estimate)
We could easily map the progress of Islam in the UK on to the American
population:
now 2nd religion or minority
202020302040- average daily practitioners (estimate)
205020602070- Most practiced faith (estimate)
In 2011, the British showed no less daily worshippers in Islam, ie our daily
worship became in the fold of Islam; in 2021, the British will show more
weekly observance of Islam as per congregants in Mosques in the capital

61

and in 2041 it is expected to be made a public fact of public life, that


adherents of Islam outnumber all other faiths in London. All this
additional data proves is that by 2061 in the UK, there will be more people
admitting Islam as the faith than Christianity.

62

2.6 How will the world manage, economically?- Economic equality


and equilibrium
World equilibrium and global equality
Lets look at the present macroeconomic inequality at present:
1. The far east is too overpopulated, perhaps too is the Muslim
Ummah
2. Muslims are too poor
Nevertheless, this country, like other Christian countries are on their way
down the list of GDP countries due to their lack of growth. The world
wars, 1, 2, and now a possible third mountain, if we see the level of debt, in
the UK.
Pakistan will overtake Britain in the size of its economy as per GDP (PPP).
Jim O Niel, who coined the BRICS, says Pakistan will be 18th biggest
country in the world by GDP (PPP). So this is the GDP as per the First
world. Remember if we take account of variations in the value of money
(ie use PPP) we still ignore the fact that some countries have small cities
where things are cheaper still. Pakistan has a GDP (PPP) of almost 10
trillion, like Brazil. Interestingly, above it are the other Asian tiger
economies, Malaysia, Hong Kong, etc and below it are Iran, Turkey as well
as France, Germany etc.
In peace is written the historical destiny of the enlightened future of the
blessed country of Pakistan, an economic miracle. Our destiny is of
economic, military, social and religious ascendency and domination over
all European peoples, by 2050. We are the policemen stopping European
economies from challenging the top 20 economies of the world.
Pakistan and the future generation The enlightened future of an
economic miracle
This theory spells the rise of Pakistan as a superpower through its goal of
ascendancy and domination. It may grow to be the largest of all Muslim

63

countries. Through a battle against deprivation and not just the unjust
assertion of the religion of the Muslim Pakistanis was formed the nation of
Pakistan, and so Pakistans creation till now we, as Muslim Pakistanis seek
to save ourselves from deprivation and not to unnecessarily assert
religious rights of self or other.
Citigroup predict, in 2050:
GDP (PPP):
1. India: $85.97 trillion
2. China: $80.02 trillion
3. United States: $39.07 trillion
4. Indonesia: $13.93 trillion
5. Brazil: $11.58 trillion
6. Nigeria: $9.51 trillion
7. Russia: $7.77 trillion
8. Mexico: $6.57 trillion
9. Japan: $6.48 trillion
10. Egypt: $6.02 trillion.
Followed by: Korea/Taiwan/Hong Kong/Singapore (4 Asian Tigers)
Vietnam
Philippines
Bangladesh
Pakistan
GDP per capita:

64

Singapore's per capita income is estimated by Knight Frank and Citi


Private Wealth's 2012 Wealth Report to be the highest in the world at
$56,532 in 2010, measured by purchasing power parity. Norway follows at
$51,226, then the U.S. ($45,511), Hong Kong ($45,301) and Switzerland
($42,470). (The International Monetary Fund listed Singapore 3rd in the
world in 2010-11 by per capita GDP, behind Qatar and Luxembourg, which
weren't included in the Knight Frank report).
By 2050, the Wealth Report estimates the world's wealthy citizens will be
dominated by Asia: Singapore ($137,710), Hong Kong ($116,639), Taiwan
($114,093) and South Korea ($107,752). The only western economy
projected to remain in the top five is the U.S., with an estimated per capita
income of $100,802.
- CNN
Theoretically, we could place the first, second and third worlds on a
historical timescale and relate their importance in this way. Accordingly,
Pakistan and India would, for example, take preference, in terms of
development etc, over, say, China or America, where 4.5% of the world has
usurped 19.5% of the worlds wealth. The American one percent will take a
correction by future religion. It is strange how they are rich and control so
much. In fact they, Americans, have amassed a fifth of the worlds wealth
in terms of economic resources, contrary to some depictions of the one
percent having half or a third of everything etc:
O mankind, fear your Lord, who created you from one soul and
created from it its mate and dispersed from both of them many men and
women. And fear Allah , through whom you ask one another, and the
wombs. Indeed Allah is ever, over you, an Observer.
The Holy Quran 4:1

65

If modernity or mercantilism has taught us any lesson it is that the export


of middle-classism is fruitful economically for humanity as a collective,
and it comes at a cost. We went to space at the cost of nuclear war, now we
are middle-class, at the cost of megamurder; to prove the first we see USSR
achieving and USA costing us, but the second is the fruit of countries like
India and Pakistan, economies like China, Malaysia and Indonesia, who
will rise above the first world economically despite being third world by
most peoples current definition.
For the greater part of the last century, more people were Indian than any
other nation amongst humanity. Indeed more Muslims were Indian than
any of other nation in the world. Now through Pakistani Mujahid struggle
and Chinese liberation struggle, the world will witness that even USSR and
USA would be content to be middle-class people, and worldly
megamurder will dissipate. Indeed the historical significance of being a
victim of megafamine for India will never and should never be denied.
The poor countries remain, of an authoritarian governance system, but in
terms of megasystems, murder will inshallah be eradicated from them as
well as from the rich. Whoever the USA invades is no longer seen as bad,
rather who USA doesnt murder is seen as evil and away from the cause.
Whoever puts the world first not second, like China or third, like India, is
perceived through the concepts of zuhad and tawadhu to be innately evil.
Whomsoever puts the Creator of all of the creatures first is pure and good.
A Quantitative theory of developmental economics
After study of both normative economics and the science of developmental
economics, it is clear a system or a method for the gradation of economies,
economic systems and indeed countries is required. Earlier, I suggest the
older and wiser the people of a country are the more they would have
developed their economic endeavour.

66

An Islamic model for economic enterprise is founded on solid social


principles and this is the grounding for my theory. Whereas age is
considered as a possible cause of the ideology of money ie wealth, it is
dismissed and it is size which is of most importance causally.
We can say that neither age nor wealth nor money causes economic
activity. Indeed it is people who do. So, assuming no diminishing returns,
India or China, being the only countries in the world with billions of
people, should be the biggest economies of the world, in the future.
Economic activity

Size of an economy
Figure 17: Proportion in economic activity
That means the new world order should be rephrased as the top 3
economies of today reverse their positions. So USA, China.... become
China, India and America.
2014
2012
2013
2014
1.CHN
China
14,789,517
16,173,272
17,617,321
2.USA
America
16,163,150
16,768,050
17,418,925
3.IND
India
2,343,802
2,511,439
2,676,081
4.JPN
Japan
4,543,204
4,685,286
4,750,771
Figure 18: Table showing China as the new head of economically
developed countries

67

The obligation to, the fairness for the poor and the rights of all of society,
and then all of the world should not be ignored. Further there should be
wealth for all continents in the world, Nigeria and Indonesia, for example
should spread wealth to Africa and so on. Wealth should not be restricted
to Europe on its own.
The subjugation and domination of even all European and American
peoples by the religion of Islam is possible too.
The superceding of China, in its population size over other countries,
particularly India (for some two hundred years) and its recent overtaking
of all other countries in terms of its economic power (particularly over the
States), inspite of the European and American countries having more
economic power (GDP) in terms of the individuals in those countries,
shows how Islam is rising to do the job of the subjugation and domination
of European and American peoples.
It is the dar al Islam and religious majority in some parts of Europe
(Bosnia, Kosovo and Albania) and is also now a religious majority in other
countries in Europe when participative measures of religion are taken.
Very soon, in a matter of decades, USA too, will have a religious majority
similar to UKs (when adherents or congregants are measured) where an
Islamic religious majority and thus dar al Islam are emerging or have
emerged already.
Indeed, the supercession of the religion of Islam in the USA (which will
take place in a handful of decades) will mean al Islam has taken over as the
outright religion of the world and has in other words spread throughout
the world.
Living here in Britain it is of less use, to involve ourselves in Dengs
economic reforms or the peaceful rise of China. No doubt the economic
success over the last decades and for this decade and for the coming
decades in China is immense, a greater historical achievement than
European or American economics ever made. Nevertheless the

68

transference of power or the transference of religious power here in the Uk


(from christianists to Muslims) is what I shall focus on here.
Much as I have written on London boroughs swaying towards Islam and
Muslim majority status, the MCB, if we study their publications on the
census and Islam in Britain, do not mention Muslims, boroughs or
anything. They talk about political constituencies. This means how many
Muslim candidates are representing the people as well as what kind of
people are based in these constituencies as per faith practices.
What we must accept here is that there is no division in Islam between
Islam (ie. Religion) and politics (ie. Local or governmental). Christianism is
distinct from the religion of Jesus and the Apostles as it is non-montheistic
and non-Abrahamic. It is founded on there being dissonance between the
religious and non-religious leadership. Where we as Muslims are more
interested in how many mosques are we building to support the work of
our leadership in our communities and to support the growth of our
communities, Allah is testing us by interesting us in power, prestige and
status.
The truly Great cultures or civilisations such as mentioned in Divine
texts of Abrahamic faiths, have made economic systems and destroyed
them, replacing them with more humane ones, the most humane of all
being dar al islam.
They show the innate weaknesses of man-made systems and how Islam
proposes a solution to them by offering the way of life to live by what God
has revealed to humanity.
These are not simply answers to social questions they are cures to social
grievances and to human diseases.
Post-mercantile or neomercantile economics
Post- mercantile economics focuses on secondary and tertiary production
and the concept of wealth not just money. This concerns the 3rd world as
much as the so-called 1st world. It uses a quantitative approach as regards

69

the wealth-driven and sees money-driven economics as slave-driving or


slave-driven. We note economics is not differentiated age-wise, so there is
little regard between true economics and slave-driven economics in the
sense of classifying economic systems age-wise.
Ideally there is an improvement in the sense that zakat on wealth is
peaceful whereas tax on money or income is warmongery. Postmercantilism rejects the use of colonial arrogance and aggression as well as
failing UN, UK, US, NATO, IMF etc. protection. In this sense it is against
extreme economic forms, as well of course as in the sense of public versus
private or state ownership. It finds a balance between both oppression
versus rigid controls on the one hand, and market forces versus
governance on the other. The result is the end of the foggy notion of the
superiority of first world over second over third world.
In the future Islamic economies will be the only First world and the
capitalists will be relegated to the present Second world. The third world
will be destroyed as a term and it will no longer be relevant to any
countries as such.
All the Muslim countries, UAE, KSA, Pakistan, Indonesia, Nigeria,
Malaysia, Morocco, Iraq, Afghanistan and Algeria will increase their share
of World GDP (only Iran, Bosnia and Turkey have decreased shares). All of
the non-Muslim countries, US, UK etc will have less in output with the
exception of China and India.

70

Chapter 3- The religion of Islam in the UK and USA II


3.1 Outcast America
The decimation of America through the decimation of its system of allies
is taking place today. Today, we find America and all its rich friends are
attacking the blessed land of Ash Shaam. It occurs to me, and I note that
our neighbour from across the Atlantic Ocean is outcast from the land of
Prophet Adam (AS), Prophet Noah (AS) and Prophet Ibrahim (AS) by
losing the war of Iraq. Even if she should be expelled from Ash Shaam,
which I pray America will be, she will be outcast of the lands of Prophet
Dawud (AS) and Sulaimaan (AS) as well.
In other words, like the first man was outcast from heaven, American
forces will be outcast from the Holy Land as they see it. No doubt they will
admit once that has happened that we are being fair when we swear that
there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad (SWS) is His Messenger
and fight for the word of God to be utmost in the land.
The dismantling of the American war machine is taking place through the
dismantling of its system of allies. America as most of the world

50
40
30

Islam

20

Christianity

10
0
2020

2040

2060

2080

Figure 19: The rise of the Islamic faith in America- Millions of congregants
per week

71

knows has invaded Iraq and Afghanistan for periods of around 10 years. In
both cases in fact they are still there. The world wars combined lasted for
shorter than these wars individually.
This asymmetric war-bent people are obsessed with cold, world, just,
permanent, perpetual war. What is less well known is that they being
evangelical and neo-conservative should have invaded Britain, at least that
way, the UK would have more Christians than Muslims.
This is obviously their only interest, religious terrorism. Logically, Fascism
comes from Catholics and Nazism from Protestants. So they, Americans
are Nazis, well, failed Nazis. As it is Britain has been conquered by the
Islamic faith. In France and Germany too, the main religion being practised
is Al Islam. The top three American allies then have been proselytised into
Al Islam. America itself has been declared as the height of all evil and the
greatest threat to humanitys survival as well as the systems of economic
production and biological reproduction.

15
10
Christianism

Islam
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050

Figure 20: The rise of the Islamic faith in Britain - Millions of congregants
per week
Saudia Arabia and Pakistan, countries which are 100% Muslim, are left, as
well as Japan, to serve on the list of Americas allies as Imperialists. Other

72

than this, Turkey, which is no longer an ally of Israel and instead MPs
wear Muslim hijab and so on, may well be the only major power which
doesnt fight America or doesnt try to hamper American interests.
3.2 The insignificance of Christianism
The practical denunciation of the Christianist faith by Great Britain and
therefore the common wealth, have served to enforce a slogan of no
war on the poor. War is the health of the States and its cause is the wealth
that it has usurped from the rest of the respected peoples of the world.
Not only are there many countries who subscribe to the imperialist design
(eg. in Africa, the Carribean and the Pacific) but of the top 20 richest
countries of the world half are part of British dominion.
Nevertheless, the number of active Muslims in London, for example, is
much greater than the number of Christians. Scores more on a daily basis,
almost twice as many on a weekly basis, if C of E is considered on its own,
and no less on a monthly or annual basis. Why then are we not allowed to
be Earls, Viscounts or Dukes? Why then, the Queen and Western and
other institutions? Why do the people use this absurd calendar or pray for
daily bread (from the lords prayer) when it is statistically absurd to
occupy and continue occupying these, as well as other lands?
I read recently about a British public school banning bearded pupils. This
meant their being coerced to shave (ie. threatened) and eventually barred
from outside contact (ie from classroom) for the 6 and a half hours
duration of the school day. Its not as if you are allowed to ask them why
they dont worship God Almighty with compassion instead of the false
Jesus, after all, Fascism and Nazism is all they own. They act as if, as
Muslims we have a monopoly on terror. No sir! As Christians you have the
monopoly on Fascism and Nazism. Thats historical fact.
And why? Because of your religious fanaticism or fundamentalism, ie.
Violent extremism. Christ, you say died a bloody death! Why dont you
sympathise with communists or do something nice for once? That would
make a bloody change!

73

Every soul will taste death, and you will only be given your [full]
compensation on the Day of Resurrection. So he who is drawn away from
the Fire and admitted to Paradise has attained [his desire]. And what is the
life of this world except the enjoyment of delusion.
The Holy Quran 3:185

74

3.3 The liberation of Uk


Nonetheless, we have seen the beginning of the entrance of the Muslims
into the British royalty and nobility. Too, what has happened in the UK is a
story of the people gradually denouncing the wicked church, the Queen
and so on and accepting as Ash Shaoob (literally The peoples), the right
of legitimacy of Allah Subhanaha wa ta Ala (literally, God, Glorious and
Exalted be His mention).
It is perhaps true that we are yet to be Mosque-builders or people of an
established Mosque-going nature, in the sense that neither are the Muslims
of the UK, nor the people at large, a splinter of any Rome or any Khalifat of
the Muslim Ummah as a whole, and neither is it practicable to be a part of
the establishment given that there is no official clergy working
effectively in our religion.
It is also true that the present corrupt system bares no heed to our (ie. As
Muslims) pressing need for domination of the system or the institutions
such as royalty and legal structures, yet we deserve respect above both
Catholicism (around one million adherents weekly) and Protestantism
(church of England figures reveal only 800,000 or 900,000 weekly
adherents) .
It is no longer a question of the church and the state, it is now Islam and
the state. In Europe and soon to be in America, Australia and so on.
Nevertheless, political life is maintained under the guidance of the Shariah.
It is not a question anymore of a division between church and state, now
Islam and the state, but increasingly here in Europe, there is a divorce
between the concepts of statehood and the people.
Somehow, we practise Islam yet our official religion is something else. As
it stands, what with the lacite policy of the west to divide religion and
statehood, Islam is the unofficial religion, but we are living with a nonMuslim system.

75

3.4 Colonialism
Colonialism (Al Istemar in Arabic) is defined by slavery as well as the
invasion and occupation of foreign lands by the so-called European
peoples. In fact they have no real linguistic, cultural nor religious right on
Europe itself, although we are not only dealing with this point here.
The best example of the colonial dream and the worst example of
humanity was the cause of the starved generation of the Pak-indo subcontinent before the creation of Pakistan.
Even today the people of the sub-continent are dropping like flies by the
million due to enforced famine and starvation. When Pakistan was created
in 1947 with a population of around 30 million, some 50 million had
already perished due to the British enforced famine through the invasion
and occupation of the British over the preceding two centuries.
The dispossession of life through the dispossession of staple foods to my
people remained a constant factor in maintaining the infidel alliance
between hindus and Christians and their theft of Muslim India. Just like in
the Americas, Columbus was busy megamurdering natives and Africans
alike, the occupiers of Muslim India were slaying millions of people
indigenous to the Pak sub-continent by the dispossession of food and
water.
The starved people could only beg then to the point that the overt policy
was that we should fall with one hand on the British loins when really their
both hands were around our neck. A deliberate policy was undertaken at
government level to withhold grain and any cheap staple from Indians,
those being at the time of the invasion of the east india co. Muslim Indians
of the Muslim India too.
Of this country of some 300 million almost 20% of that had perished of the
preceding generation. These are named the starved generation. Starved to

76

death by the British. Why? So Brits could grow fat and keep England. Did
it work? NO!
It is shocking to note the statistic, that when Muslim India was invaded by
the British, it had a population of some 150 million. In 200 years, instead of
contributing to the Muslim way of life and the truth of Islam as the last
Divine religion on earth, they savagely and barbarically killed some 35% of
the first or second largest country on earth.
They brutally murdered 50 million innocent Muslim Indians when they
themselves were barely 35-40 million in number. It was a non-stop
exhibition of wanton atrocity that was, along with slavery of Africans, the
joy of colonialism.

77

3.5 Neo-colonialism and decolonialism


The revolutionary praxis of decolonialism is suggested as the solution to
societys problems and the ills of materialism. However whereas Islamic
socialism says this revolutionary alternative is purely Marxist, the people
of the countries of the west have voiced their opinion to the effect that it is
a religious change that is to be executed. One that swings governance of
society from Christianism to Islam. When we look at history we see that
from the European peoples history, with the exception of the central Al
Andalus Muslim kingdom, Muslims have been attacked by western violent
extremism and world war, inventions of Christians. Now, we must have
the self-realisation of our potential and for our self-actualisation we must
exert our utmost selves and turn this into love and affection if we so desire,
for example, that British children, in British schools, those being Muslim by
majority, should have the freedom to have even their holidays according to
their religion.
The Islamic model of peace shows us how all facets of society in Islam, for
example economics, is the highest of the economic systems known to man,
whereas America is the lowest of the low. What do Americans do to value
and rent? They war by ending all value as well as all human values. Above
and beyond being rent-destroying, usa actually destroyed the atom which
the universe consists of, in order to borrow more from the lenders in order
to finance the murder of the same lenders.
Here, we have won the war against American religious inaction, down to
economic and financial inaction. We have won the battle for American
hearts and minds, not just have we won over the land, but the households,
the families, the businesses, the corporations, but the NGOs etc who make
up the land.
And do not be like the ones who became divided and differed after the clear proofs
had come to them. And those will have a great punishment.
The Holy Quran 3:105

78

3.6 Statehood as atavism or antiquity


Do not become confused with Marxism and its idea of fighting the unjust
power of internal oppression, social suppression or cultural repression etc
is a move from mercantilism (characterised by international free market
protectionism) to post-mercantilism (characterised by post-feudalism). It is
not both are forms of serfdom and serve the interests of pan-world-ism and
globalisation. Scientific socialism and socialism, be it Islamic, can only
serve to change the basic factors of production and distribution etc, it has a
negative effect on protectionism, war and the level of centrality of
command in a government. This is due to the innate evil of the globalist
drive at its and capitalisms very plight and fight.
Do not confuse the inferiority of a prophet of Allah (which is being always
inferior to Allah) with a mans inferiority before another man. Do not
confuse the Islamic monotheism of belief in One God with the idea that
doing good and benefitting others with ones good works and social
welfare are somehow fighting the system.
The Marxist idea of exploitation was a shift from slave-driven to wealthdriven economics. Values changed as people realised that the Muslim
Prophets who Jews and Christians alike, so admired, were actually
relatively hard-up, made a profit from their own hands work and shared in
that.
Although this was described as simplicity of life, humbleness and
abstentiousness by some, it was for the ahlekitabs concept of
challenging exploitation en masse, yet was never removed from the
religion or Divine simplicity of Islam.
Capital, profit and expenses, and assets and liabilities accounts show a
different picture than income and expenditures and assets and liabilities
and equity changes in financial statements. Marxism, like capitalism shows
a fixation with capital and an ignorance of economics and accounting due
to the ignorance of the purposes of profit:

79

1. Personal
2. Social
In our society we are taught to earn an honest wage. But are we really
deserving of it? We are obsessed with financing ourselves at the cost of
others when we should see the harmony between conventional uses of
profit such as financing and re-enacting what we do ourselves, and Zakat.
For Marx the object or commodity is an object of fetishisation, for me it is
the subject of sacrifice. Zakat, unlike the refinancing of sales can be used to
cover losses. Indeed it is a reason to have created a governing state and
works in the service of God and His creatures. Nonetheless it is a form of
magnanimity or philanthropy.

80

3.7 Religious ratios


Ratios for religiousness, belief and participation in family and religious life
can be calculated.
The value of p of the general population is the nearest percentile of the
general population. So, for example, the p for daily observance as
measured by congregations in places of worship is taken, we have twice in
Islam as for Christianity, as the value of p is 2 for Islam and again 2 for
Christianity. In short, the religious obligation on a daily basis, in Britain is
towards practising Islam, whereas in America, it is still to participate in
going to Church on the weekend, for now, in the UK, the participative
religious activity is very soon going to be Mosque on Friday.
In the case of UK, USA, they still go more to the church in the week than
the mosque. However without affiliation, perhaps UK and USA are evenly
split between Muslims and Christians, a half-way house.
The people are on an even keel between Islam and Christianity. In terms of
the raw data plus weekly worship, we are still following Christianity but in
terms of daily obligations and sort of family or future measures, we are
now Muslim.

81

3.8 The reproductive religious believers ratio


1. Do you have faith in God?
2. Do you act on the faith that you have in God?
There is a clear difference between belief in God Almighty on its own and
the measurement for this, and a measurement for participation in religious
activity with its corresponding dimension of religious practice or in
German, praxis. The above two questions show how any measurement for
determining the religion of a people as belonging to one religion or
another, must go beyond the simple Which faith do you ascribe to?
question.
The reproductive religious believers ratio (RRP ratio) gets into three or
four different things:
1. Biological survival- It tells us about reproduction. It tells us about
fertility. By including those people who have grown up living with
both parents instead of with single parents, it comes to a sensible
idea over which religion is producing and reproducing people who
will prolong a propagated faith. So it tells us about which religion is
procreating the faith as well as propagating the faith.
2. Religiousity- It tells us about a religion and its followers, whether
they themselves consider themselves to be a religion. So, by
including those who say they are religious, it attests to the validity of
a religion ie. If those surveyed agree with the notion of the
measurement take or not.
3. Faith in God- It reminds us of what is at heart, whether the sample
population believe in this God or that, or the other. By including
those who say they believe in a God, it looks beyond religion and
participation and moves into the area of faith and its praxis.

82

4. Daily praxis- This measurement is to include as our definition of


Muslims or Christians, only those who pray in congregation daily. It
has not been calculated.
5. Weekly praxis- At the moment the RRB ratio, or simply the ratio
includes only those people in the general population who go to the
places of worship on a weekly basis.

It is therefore interesting to note that whereas in Islamic countries, eg.


Afghanistan, 99 or 100% people are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Muslim
Have both parents bringing them up
Pray daily and weekly in congregation
Believe conscientiously
Are religious

In countries like USA which can only be described as half-way house (or
even keel between Muslim and Christian), only half are, it is therefore not
surprising that one expects Afghanis, Pakistanis, Indians, Bengalis, etc.
who are Muslim to overtake the other religions in the west.

83

Chapter 4 Little Pakistan


London
Boroughs

%
M%

C%

Average

Average

Average

Average

weekly

daily

weekly

daily

worshipp
ers
in
Muslim

worshipper
s
in
Muslim
places
of

worshipp
ers
in
Christian

worshippe
rs
in
Christian

places of

places of

worship

worship

worship

worship

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

places of

Camden

12.09%

33.96%

3.02%

1.51%

3.40%

1.70%

5.55%

45.34%

1.39%

0.69%

4.53%

2.27%

Hackney

14.10%

38.63%

3.53%

1.76%

3.86%

1.93%

Hammersmith and
Fulham

10.00%

54.14%

2.50%

1.25%

5.41%

2.71%

Haringey

14.17%

44.98%

3.54%

1.77%

4.50%

2.25%

Islington

9.47%

40.21%

2.37%

1.18%

4.02%

2.01%

Kensington and
Chelsea

9.97%

54.21%

2.49%

1.25%

5.42%

2.71%

Lambeth

7.09%

53.10%

1.77%

0.89%

5.31%

2.66%

Lewisham

6.44%

52.77%

1.61%

0.80%

5.28%

2.64%

Newham

31.97%

39.98%

7.99%

4.00%

4.00%

2.00%

8.52%

52.54%

2.13%

1.06%

5.25%

2.63%

34.51%

27.08%

8.63%

4.31%

2.71%

1.35%

Wandsworth

8.06%

52.96%

2.02%

1.01%

5.30%

2.65%

Westminster

18.27%

44.61%

4.57%

2.28%

4.46%

2.23%

Barking and Dagenham

13.73%

56.00%

3.43%

1.72%

5.60%

2.80%

Barnet

10.31%

41.21%

2.58%

1.29%

4.12%

2.06%

Bexley

2.43%

62.11%

0.61%

0.30%

6.21%

3.11%

Brent

City of London

Southwark
Tower Hamlets

18.65%

41.48%

4.66%

2.33%

4.15%

2.07%

Bromley

2.53%

60.65%

0.63%

0.32%

6.07%

3.03%

Croydon

8.12%

56.42%

2.03%

1.02%

5.64%

2.82%

Ealing

15.72%

43.75%

3.93%

1.96%

4.37%

2.19%

Enfield

16.69%

53.58%

4.17%

2.09%

5.36%

2.68%

6.82%

52.89%

1.70%

0.85%

5.29%

2.64%

12.50%

37.31%

3.12%

1.56%

3.73%

1.87%

Havering

2.04%

65.59%

0.51%

0.25%

6.56%

3.28%

Hillingdon

10.61%

49.21%

2.65%

1.33%

4.92%

2.46%

Hounslow

14.04%

42.00%

3.51%

1.76%

4.20%

2.10%

Kingston upon Thames

5.92%

52.91%

1.48%

0.74%

5.29%

2.65%

Merton

8.14%

56.08%

2.04%

1.02%

5.61%

2.80%

23.30%

36.83%

5.82%

2.91%

3.68%

1.84%

3.28%

55.25%

0.82%

0.41%

5.53%

2.76%

4.06%

58.42%

1.02%

0.51%

5.84%

2.92%

21.89%

48.38%

5.47%

2.74%

4.84%

2.42%

12.39%

48.42%

3.10%

1.55%

4.84%

2.42%

Greenwich
Harrow

Redbridge
Richmond upon
Thames
Sutton
Waltham Forest

84

Figure 21: Extrapolated 2011 Census table of daily/ weekly


worshippers in London places of worship who are Muslim or
Christian.
Islam shows less in the census, but adherents are about 3% of Londoners,
Christian adherents are taken as a rate of almost 5%. This means over 3%
of Londoners are estimated to pray communally prescribed prayers daily
being Muslim, whereas almost 5% is taken as the rate for Christians.
4.1 The sack of the new Roman empire
A demographic and political miracle is taking place, a population
explosion, a population bomb the replacement of white Christians
through biology and religion, through a replacement philosophy. The
political debate on immigration aside, transference, and a transfer of
power is coming here, to UK and US shores, no doubt. There is a
renewed interest in the west in religion (Islam) and the transaction (din
as a rally of actions), which give Islam, a reach out and grab quality.
This is my iman.
Whether evil has been pushed out or it is caught packing up of its own
accord, depends very much on who is making the perspective in their
mind. African and Red Indian holocaust denial is a crime against humanity
and indeed Americas first amendment. The holocaust of Jews is
perpertrated by the same white blue-eyed people who criminalised its
denial. The US constituition and the Magna carta should be revised to
accommodate Muslims.
Time and again we are told the bible is revised or edited, why as well as
the above mentioned holocaust is those of the British rule in Muslim India,
far more severe in their severity. Indeed after the holocausts and
holodomors of british rule in Muslim India, the Magna carta must be
aboloished as it stands for liberty-taking of the church in our realm. This is
the demand of Al tamaddan e Islam (Islamic civilisation).

85

Projected 2021 Census table of daily/ weekly worshippers in London places


of worship who are Muslim or Christian.

London
boroughs

2,021
Muslim

M%

C%

Average

Average

Average

Average

weekly

daily

weekly

daily

worshippers

worshippers

in Christian

in Christian

places of

places of

worshippers
in
Muslim
places of

Camden

worshipper
s
in
Muslim
places
of

worship

worship

worship

worship

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

53,286

19.50%

30.30%

4.88%

2.44%

3.03%

1.52%

818

10.00%

43.00%

2.50%

1.25%

4.30%

2.15%

Hackney

69,454

22.00%

33.90%

5.50%

2.75%

3.39%

1.70%

Hammersmith and Fulham

36,484

16.70%

49.20%

4.18%

2.09%

4.92%

2.46%

Haringey

72,260

22.10%

39.40%

5.53%

2.76%

3.94%

1.97%

Islington

39,042

15.90%

36.70%

3.98%

1.99%

3.67%

1.84%

Kensington and Chelsea

31,624

16.60%

49.30%

4.15%

2.08%

4.93%

2.47%

Lambeth

43,000

12.40%

49.60%

3.10%

1.55%

4.96%

2.48%

Lewisham

35,518

11.40%

49.60%

2.85%

1.43%

4.96%

2.48%

Newham

196,912

39.00%

30.30%

9.75%

4.88%

3.03%

1.52%

49,102

14.60%

48.40%

3.65%

1.83%

4.84%

2.42%

175,392

40.80%

20.10%

10.20%

5.10%

2.01%

1.01%

Wandsworth

49,492

13.90%

49.00%

3.48%

1.74%

4.90%

2.45%

Westminster

80,146

26.80%

37.70%

6.70%

3.35%

3.77%

1.89%

Barking and Dagenham

51,040

21.50%

49.20%

5.38%

2.69%

4.92%

2.46%

Barnet

73,488

17.10%

37.40%

4.28%

2.14%

3.74%

1.87%

City of London

Southwark
Tower Hamlets

Bexley

11,290

4.60%

60.60%

1.15%

0.58%

6.06%

3.03%

Brent

116,072

27.20%

35.00%

6.80%

3.40%

3.50%

1.75%

Bromley

15,682

4.80%

59.20%

1.20%

0.60%

5.92%

2.96%

Croydon

59,026

14.00%

52.20%

3.50%

1.75%

5.22%

2.61%

Ealing

106,396

23.90%

37.80%

5.98%

2.99%

3.78%

1.89%

Enfield

104,282

25.00%

45.90%

6.25%

3.13%

4.59%

2.30%

Greenwich

34,698

12.00%

49.50%

3.00%

1.50%

4.95%

2.48%

Harrow

59,762

20.00%

33.20%

5.00%

2.50%

3.32%

1.66%

Havering

9,658

3.90%

64.30%

0.98%

0.49%

6.43%

3.22%

Hillingdon

58,130

17.50%

44.50%

4.38%

2.19%

4.45%

2.23%

Hounslow

71,332

21.90%

36.80%

5.48%

2.74%

3.68%

1.84%

Kingston upon Thames

18,948

10.60%

50.00%

2.65%

1.33%

5.00%

2.50%

Merton

32,524

14.00%

51.90%

3.50%

1.75%

5.19%

2.60%

129,998

31.80%

29.90%

7.95%

3.98%

2.99%

1.50%

Richmond upon Thames

12,256

6.20%

53.50%

1.55%

0.78%

5.35%

2.68%

Sutton

15,452

7.50%

56.10%

1.88%

0.94%

5.61%

2.81%

113,082

30.50%

39.70%

7.63%

3.81%

3.97%

1.99%

2,025,646

18.00%

44.00%

4.50%

2.25%

4.40%

2.20%

Redbridge

Waltham Forest

86

Projected 2031 Census table of daily/ weekly worshippers in London places of


worship who are Muslim or Christian.

London
boroughs

2,031
Muslim

M%

C%

Average

Average

Average

Average

weekly

daily

weekly

daily

worshippers

worshippers

in Christian

in Christian

places of

places of

worship

worship

(%)

(%)

worship

worshipper
s
in
Muslim
places
of
worship

(%)

(%)

Worshippers
in Muslim
places of

Camden
City of London
Hackney
Hammersmith and Fulham

106,572

32.60%

25.35%

8.15%

4.07%

2.53%

1.27%

1,636

18.16%

31.20%

4.54%

2.27%

3.12%

1.56%

138,908

36.06%

27.86%

9.02%

4.51%

2.79%

1.39%

72,968

28.56%

35.13%

7.14%

3.57%

3.51%

1.76%

Haringey

144,520

36.18%

31.02%

9.05%

4.52%

3.10%

1.55%

Islington

78,084

27.47%

28.68%

6.87%

3.43%

2.87%

1.43%

Kensington and Chelsea

63,248

28.50%

35.15%

7.13%

3.56%

3.52%

1.76%

Lambeth

86,000

22.10%

34.68%

5.53%

2.76%

3.47%

1.73%

Lewisham

71,036

20.48%

34.54%

5.12%

2.56%

3.45%

1.73%

Newham

393,824

56.12%

28.56%

14.03%

7.01%

2.86%

1.43%

98,204

25.41%

34.44%

6.35%

3.18%

3.44%

1.72%

Southwark
Tower Hamlets

350,784

57.99%

21.31%

14.50%

7.25%

2.13%

1.07%

Wandsworth

98,984

24.38%

34.62%

6.10%

3.05%

3.46%

1.73%

Westminster

160,292

42.22%

30.85%

10.55%

5.28%

3.08%

1.54%

Barking and Dagenham

102,080

35.45%

35.90%

8.86%

4.43%

3.59%

1.79%

Barnet

146,976

29.20%

29.18%

7.30%

3.65%

2.92%

1.46%

Bexley

22,580

8.87%

38.31%

2.22%

1.11%

3.83%

1.92%

Brent

232,144

42.72%

29.32%

10.68%

5.34%

2.93%

1.47%

Bromley

31,364

9.20%

37.75%

2.30%

1.15%

3.78%

1.89%

Croydon

118,052

24.52%

36.07%

6.13%

3.07%

3.61%

1.80%

Ealing

212,792

38.60%

30.43%

9.65%

4.83%

3.04%

1.52%

Enfield

208,564

40.03%

34.89%

10.01%

5.00%

3.49%

1.74%

69,396

21.42%

34.59%

5.36%

2.68%

3.46%

1.73%

Greenwich
Harrow

119,524

33.33%

27.17%

8.33%

4.17%

2.72%

1.36%

Havering

19,316

7.53%

39.61%

1.88%

0.94%

3.96%

1.98%

Hillingdon

116,260

29.80%

32.98%

7.45%

3.72%

3.30%

1.65%

Hounslow

142,664

35.97%

29.58%

8.99%

4.50%

2.96%

1.48%

Kingston upon Thames

37,896

19.14%

34.60%

4.79%

2.39%

3.46%

1.73%

Merton

65,048

24.57%

35.93%

6.14%

3.07%

3.59%

1.80%

259,996

48.24%

26.92%

12.06%

6.03%

2.69%

1.35%

24,512

11.59%

35.59%

2.90%

1.45%

3.56%

1.78%

Redbridge
Richmond upon Thames
Sutton
Waltham Forest

30,904

13.98%

36.88%

3.50%

1.75%

3.69%

1.84%

226,164

46.69%

32.61%

11.67%

5.84%

3.26%

1.63%

4,051,292

33.14%

32.62%

8.28%

4.14%

3.26%

1.63%

87

Conclusion
On the presence of Islam in the British Islands. A relative not absolute
majority
The following survey would give a clear answer, to how many of the
London boroughs still have Christianity being practised in them:
London
borough

Admitted Admitted
Believes Termed
Weekly
Daily
Christianity in God themselves Mosque Practitioners
Islam
religious
attendees

N.B. Religious practice is distinct from just religious affiliation

Barking &
Dagenham
Newham
Redbridge
Tower
Hamlets
Waltham
forest
Figure 22: Christians are an relative minority in London and Muslims far
exceed Christians as per both daily and weekly worshippers
Perhaps in the census, this can be done to rule out Christianity by knowing
which boroughs exactly dont have outright domination in Islam.
At the moment we know, for example Tower Hamlets has a Muslim
majority and this is practised by the people in their communal and
everyday living. What we need to know by the next census is how has the
situation changed. What about Redbridge? What about Newham?
If a borough measures 3 (out of 5) from any faith, then the borough is
said to practise that faith. At the moment I can only say the scores are

88

overwhelmingly in favour of Islam. Mainly because Christianity, like


Latin is dead, it is theory without practice.
Further to this in the five measures Pakistan takes close to 100% compared
to European countries taking only half in each. So the future is written for
Islam in Europe.