36
he frequency and severity of natural disasters1 in India are increasing. In 2013-14 alone India
witnessed several major natural disasters
floods and landslides in Uttarakhand,
drought in Maharashtra, cyclones Phailin
and Hudhud in Odisha and A ndhra
Pradesh, respectively that affected
millions of people and caused an unprecedented scale of financial loss, including
the cost of response and recovery. The
level of intensity and the degree of
loss raise the question regarding the
effectiveness/preparedness of disaster risk
management in India.
Context
India is among the worlds most vulnerable areas to natural hazards,2 particularly
earthquakes, floods, droughts, cyclones,
and landslides. The Global Climate
Change and Vulnerability Index 2011
ranked India as the second extreme risk
country in the world after Bangladesh,
vulnerable to natural and climate change
hazards (Verisk Maplecroft 2011). As per
the latest seismic zoning map brought
out by the Bureau of Indian Standards
(BIS),3 about 60% of the country is prone
to earthquakes of intensity VII or more on
the Medvedev-Sponheuer-Karnik (MSK)4
scale. Over 8% of Indias landmass is
susceptible to cyclone hazards and almost
76% of the 7,516 kilometre-long coastline is prone to cyclones and tsunamis.
Approximately 68% of the country is
drought prone; 12% of the area is susceptible to floods, and approximately 15% of
the total area of the country is susceptible
to landslides.
Climate-induced hazards are very
common in the entire Himalayan region.
According to the Fourth Assessment report
of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC), the incidence
of floods in the Himalayan region are
vol l no 5
EPW
PERSPECTIVES
EPW
PERSPECTIVES
plans for identified areas of vulnerability will become possible as that is central
to their mandate. The exercise of designing disaster management plans will
enable states to better understand and
know in advance which districts or
blocks are more prone to disasters, and
which are better prepared to handle
them. It will also assist the states in
identifying deficiencies in infrastructure
(e g, whether building standards and
safety regulations have been adhered to
or not, lack of support infrastructure,
etc) within the identified vulnerable
areas. These plans also include various
mapping processes within the state
high density areas, livelihood/land use,
resources (hospitals, fire stations, doctors)
and weather/rainfall patterns. It is these
plans and information that work as the
basis for mitigating disasters.
Such information can be stored as
part of a national/state disaster database,
along with digitalised maps through
geographic information system (GIS), and
will help monitor, analyse and prioritise
mitigation activities over time, thereby
improving the preparedness of high-risk
zones to face disasters. Such initiatives
need to be in place in identified high-risk
zones that have a tendency of increasing
population growth, especially in the
coastal areas. For example, with the
physical loss sustained during cyclone
Phailin, the Odisha government, through
a process of systematic analysis, has
planned to increase the number of
cyclone shelters and strengthen existing
ones, construct pucca resilient houses
for people living within a five kilometre
distance from the coastal line, and
are also considering underground electrical cabling in the coastal areas (World
Bank 2014).
vol l no 5
EPW
PERSPECTIVES
EPW
39
PERSPECTIVES
volcanic activity) and climatological (drought,
extreme temperature or wild fires).
2 All of south Asia including India is prone to
multiple disasters, which is defined as two
or more natural hazards that affect a vulner
able population in the same region, singly or
in combination in N S Ray-Bennett (2009),
Multiple Disasters and Policy Responses Preand Post-Independence Orissa, India, Disaster,
33(2) 274-90.
3 IS 1893-Part 1: 2002, Map of Seismic Zones of
India.
4 The Medvedev-Sponheuer-Karnik scale, also
known as theMSK,is a macro-seismic intensity
scale used to evaluate the severity of ground
shaking on the basis of observed effects in an
area of theearthquakeoccurrence. Scale VII is
indicated as strong.
5 As referred to on the website of NDMA, http://
www.ndmindia.nic.in/letters/initiatives%20
taken%20by%20govt.htm, accessed on 10 Jan
uary 2015.
6 Ibid: 23.
References
Chauhan, Chetan and Zia Haq (2013): When Will
We Learn to Manage Disaster?, The Hindustan
Times, New Delhi, 6 July.
Dickson, Eric, Judy L Baker, Daniel Hoorweg and
Asmita Tiwari (2012): Urban Risk Assess
ments: Understanding Disaster and Climate
Risk in Cities, Urban Development Series,
Washington DC, World Bank.
IPCC (2007): Climate Change 2007: Synthesis
Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II
and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the
T R Raghunandan
The idea of devolving power to local governments was part of the larger political debate during the Indian national
movement. With strong advocates for it, like Gandhi, it resulted in constitutional changes and policy decisions in the
decades following Independence, to make governance more accountable to and accessible for the common man.
The introduction discusses the milestones in the evolution of local governments post-Independence, while providing an
overview of the panchayat system, its evolution and its powers under the British, and the stand of various leaders of the
Indian national movement on decentralisation.
This volume discusses the constitutional amendments that gave autonomy to institutions of local governance, both rural
and urban, along with the various facets of establishing and strengthening these local self-governments.
Authors:
V M Sirsikar Nirmal Mukarji C H Hanumantha Rao B K Chandrashekar Norma Alvares Poornima Vyasulu, Vinod Vyasulu Niraja Gopal Jayal
Mani Shankar Aiyar Benjamin Powis Amitabh Behar, Yamini Aiyar Pranab Bardhan, Dilip Mookherjee Amitabh Behar Ahalya S Bhat,
Suman Kolhar, Aarathi Chellappa, H Anand Raghabendra Chattopadhyay, Esther Duflo Nirmala Buch Ramesh Ramanathan M A Oommen
Indira Rajaraman, Darshy Sinha Stphanie Tawa Lama-Rewal M Govinda Rao, U A Vasanth Rao Mary E John Pratap Ranjan Jena,
Manish Gupta Pranab Bardhan, Sandip Mitra, Dilip Mookherjee, Abhirup Sarkar M A Oommen J Devika, Binitha V Thampi