CHAPTER 1
PROBLEM AND ITS SETTING
INTRODUCTION
The
manufacturing
industry
is
faced
with
the
significant
the
industry
has
been
criticized
extensively
for
poor
repeated
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
help
facilitate
advancement
in
their
future
career
by
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Inspection,
Incoming
and
Outgoing
Quality
Control
25
26
CHAPTER 2
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
27
Overview on Reworks
28
29
on
their
literature
entitled
Failures
and
Rework
in
30
31
32
33
In-line vs. Off-line refers on the resources used for the rework
process.
In-line: Rework is done by the same resources
(machines, tools, workers) as the regular process for
the production of the good
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
been
measured
in
his
study,
indicating
that
waste
in
45
modelled,
and
generate
information
that
are
usually
46
and
Brouwers
(1996)
study.
In
this
study,
the
47
adopt
the
definitions
used
by
regional
institutions,
such
as
48
similar
problem
is
found
on
previous
studies
on
the
49
most papers on this topic do not discuss the cost components of this
type of waste.
In manufacturing systems subject to machine and operator
resource constraints the effects of rework can be profound. It was
according to Adam Jerome Brown (2012) on his study Queuing Theory
in Low to High Rework Environments with Process Availability. From
50
51
environments and/or the need for limiting assumptions. One aim of this
work is to increase understanding of system variables on the accuracy
of simple queuing models.
Capturing the effects of rework on the important metric of
queuing time, specifically when the rework process utilizes the same
resources as the original job makes the identification of its effects
52
53
Jackman
Spectrum
of
and
Johnson
Manufacturing
(1993)
mentioned
Systems
Modeling
on
their
study
Techniques
54
less holding cost. Most importantly lead time reduction eliminates nonvalue added waiting time.
Jackman and Johnson emphasized the importance of reducing
variability in production through rework minimization. Jackman and
Johnson mentioned on their study that when these things are done,
many positive outcomes are prevailed. These include improved
55
56
wastes:
transportation,
inventory,
motion,
waiting,
57
58
59
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
PROCESS-BY-PROCESS INSPECTION
60
61
NUMBER OF REWORKS
Figure 1. Conceptual Framework
62
Definition of Terms
Productivity is an average measure of the efficiency of production.
It can be expressed as the ratio of output to inputs used in the
production process, i.e. output per unit of input.
63
64
that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on
previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the
available scientific theories.
65
66
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
67
68
69
These gathered data will be correlated with the relevant studies and
related literatures that serve as basis to prove the hypotheses
formulated by the researchers.
Population and Sampling
The researchers conducted a survey wherein respondents are
composed of the entire population inside the company.
70
71
Unit
Weighted
Mean Interval
Verbal
Interpretati
on
Extent of Effect
1.00 1.75
Strongly
Severely affected
Agree
72
Moderately
1.76 2.50
Agree
2.51 3.25
Disagree
Barely Affected
3.26 4.00
Strongly
Not Affected
Affected
73
Disagree
74
75
host company who are involved in the study. At the same time, the
researchers asked for their college dean to approve their survey
questionnaire.
Second, the researchers checked the schedule of respondents for
availability in answering the questionnaire.
Third the researchers informed the respondents about the
schedule of gathering data.
76
77
78
79
CHAPTER 4
DATA AND RESULT
80
81
82
they
are
assigned.
Future
line
expansion
was
also
83
84
85
86
into the item. When components are soldered, excess parts are cut and
then the product is ready for final visual inspection (FVI). When No
Good products are seen, it is then reworked in the station where the
defect is created. Until the product is good after being inspected by the
FVI, then it is ready for packing and delivery.
87
88
Host
Company
89
90
91
Major Breakdowns
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
97.9
99.5
100
97.9
1.6
0.5
92
93
94
95
86.1
98.4
12.3
98.8
0.4
99.2
0.4
99.6
0.4
100
0.4
96
97
98
Survey Questionnaire
As survey questionnaires were disseminated to respondents,
data were gathered and these have become the basis for major
conclusions and possible solutions.
1. Profile of the Respondents
99
a. Age
Table 2
Profile of Respondents in Terms of their Age
Age Group
18-23
24-29
30-35
35 and
Total
100
above
No. of
Respondents
10
25
101
Percentage
20
28
40
12
100
The table shows that from the population of the total employees
of the host company, 20% were 18-23 years old, 28% were 24-29 years
old, 40% were 30-35 years old and 12% were 35 and above years old.
102
b. Gender
Table 3
Profile of Respondents in terms of their Gender
103
Gender
Male
Female
Total
20
25
No. of
Respondents
104
Percentage
20
80
100
Table 3 shows that there are 20% male and 80% female among
all employees of the host company.
c. Area of Employment
105
Table 4
Profile of Respondents in terms of their Area of
Employment
Type of
Production
School
Operator
Admin
Total
106
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
15
10
25
60
40
100
107
108
This part shows the data illustrating the awareness and personal
perception
of
production area.
employees
regarding
the
reworks
inside
the
109
110
Statements
1. I am aware that reworks occur
inside the production.
2. I believe that reworks affect
the number of outputs per day.
3. I believe that reworks mostly
Mea
n
SD
Adjectival
Rating
1.52
0.77
Strongly Agree
1.60
0.76
Strongly Agree
3.08
0.95
Disagree
111
1.52
0.77
Strongly Agree
3.04
0.79
Disagree
112
3.08
0.76
Disagree
2.12
0.67
Agree
1.73
0.17
Neutral
113
114
the respondents were quite consistent. This means that the majority of
the employees of the host company know that reworks occur inside the
production. They are aware that the company is reprocessing nonconforming products until it becomes ready for delivery.
I believe that reworks affect the number of outputs per
day. The table shows that most of the respondents opinion is positive,
115
the mean of 1.60 falls between the strongly agree criterion which
ranges from 1.00 to 1.75. Standard deviation of 0.76 means that the
opinion of the respondents were quite consistent as well. This means
that most of the respondents agreed that when reworks occur, their
capacity to produce outputs is lessen.
116
117
118
means that the opinion of the respondents were consistent. This result
interprets that respondents believe that most of the reworks come
from the manual soldering station which makes the manual soldering
operators responsible for the reworks.
I believe that reworks mostly come from the Manual
Cutting process. The table shows that most of the respondents
119
120
121
truly believe that most of the reworks did not come from the packaging
process.
I believe that the implementation of different quality
procedures affect the number of reworks. The table shows that
most of the respondents opinion is positive. The mean of 2.12 falls
between the agree criterion which ranges from 1.76 to 2.50. Standard
122
deviation of 0.67 means that the opinion of the respondents were quite
consistent. This means that the most respondents agreed that they the
implementation of different quality procedures affect the number of
reworks in production.
123
124
125
CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
This chapter shall discuss the summary of findings, conclusion,
and recommendation.
126
Summary of findings
1. On the profile of the respondents
a. In terms of their age
20% were 18-23 years old
28% were 24-29 years old
40% were 30-35 years old
12% were 35 and above years old
127
b. In terms of gender
128
129
130
falls between the strongly agree criterion which ranges from 1.00
to 1.75. Standard deviation of 0.77 means that the opinion of the
respondents were quite consistent. This means that the majority
of the employees of the host company know that reworks occur
inside the production. They are aware that the company is
131
132
133
134
135
were
consistent.
This
result
interprets
that
136
137
138
d. Packaging
The research shows that most of the respondents opinion
towards the number 6 statement on the questionnaire is
negative. The mean of 3.08 falls between the disagree criterion
which ranges from 2.51 to 3.25. Standard deviation of 0.76
means that the opinion of the respondents were quite consistent
139
which means that most of them truly believe that most of the
reworks did not come from the packaging process.
5. Effect of implementing different quality procedures on the
number of reworks that an operator makes.
The research illustrated a result that says most of the
employees have a positive reaction towards this. It obtained a
140
mean of 2.12 which falls between the agree criterion that ranges
from 1.76 to 2.50. Standard deviation of 0.67 means that the
opinion of the respondents were consistent. This means that the
most respondents agreed that quality procedures affect their
performance and definitely, the number of reworks per day.
141
142
Conclusions
Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusions were
drawn:
143
144
145
146
Recommendations
Based on the result of this study, the following recommendations are
offered:
147
The proponents have developed a process flow that will help the
company achieve a less-rework-producing system
Procedure
Flow
NG
Rework
START
148
149
before soldering.
3. Solder the components.
150
151
Rework
NG
Final Visual Inspection
152
defects.
Packaging
153
END
154
Cutting/Manual
Cleaning
155
There has to be more quality control stations that will assure the
output of the critical stations
(i.e.
regular
rewards/motivation)
monitoring,
tallying
of
data,
giving
156
157
158
REFERENCES
159
Website: http://www.kaertech.com
Kaertech Limited: Provides an "all-inclusive solution" by offering R&D
engineering and manufacturing services for telecommunication
products, multi-media tools, electronic modules, consumer electronic
goods, household appliances and industrial products.
Founded: 2009
160
Website: http://www.emscai.com
EMS Components Assembly, Inc. (EMS-CAI): is a locally-based,
100% Filipino-owned contract manufacturer whose main charter is to
provide cost-effective, efficient solutions to the growing global
161
162
163
Appendices
164
165
166
167
168
Name: ___________________________
Age: ______
(1)
Admin
______ (2)
169
Statements
1.
2.
3.
Strongl
y Agree
Agree
Disagre
e
Strongl
y
Disagre
e
170
4.
5.
6.
7.
PERSONAL INFORMATION
171
09068930416
172
lambit_16@yahoo.com
173
174
EDUCATION
175
Class of 2015
2 Pres. Laurel Highway, Tanauan City, Batangas
Tel No.: (63-43) 778-0656
Class of 2010
Natatas, Tanauan City, Batangas
Class of 2006
176
PERSONAL SKILLS
Communication skills
Organisational / managerial skills
Job-related skills
Computer skills
177
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
178
Seminars
IES FAITH Seminar Series
First Asia Institute of Technology and Humanities 2012
Topics Discussed: Facility Layout
ISO Systems and Standards
Strategic Management
Ergonomics
Value Engineering
Information Systems
IE as a Profession
179
Thank you for taking the time to consider my application, and I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely Yours,
Christian B. Lambit
Applicant
180
PERSONAL INFORMATION
181
09066161937
jmarleynes@yahoo.com
182
183
EDUCATION
184
Class of 2015
2 Pres. Laurel Highway, Tanauan City, Batangas
Tel No.: (63-43) 778-0656
Class of 2006
C.M. Recto Avenue, Brgy Sabang, Lipa City, Batangas
185
PERSONAL SKILLS
Communication skills
Organisational / managerial skills
Job-related skills
Computer skills
186
Driving licence
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Restriction 1
Restriction 2
187
Seminars
IE-Shikawa 8
University of the Philippines Diliman 2013
188
ANNEXES
Thank you for taking the time to consider my application, and I look forward to hearing from you.
189
190
191
Sincerely Yours,
192
Juliemar C. Leynes
Applicant
PERSONAL INFORMATION
193
09066161932
kathmanalo01@yahoo.com
194
EDUCATION
195
196
Class of 2015
2 Pres. Laurel Highway, Tanauan City, Batangas
Tel No.: (63-43) 778-0656
June 2006 March 2010
197
PERSONAL SKILLS
Communication skills
Organisational / managerial skills
Computer skills
198
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
199
Seminars
IE-Shikawa 8
University of the Philippines Diliman 2013
200
ANNEXES
201
Thank you for taking the time to consider my application, and I look forward to hearing from you.
202
203
204
Sincerely Yours,
Kathleen D. Manalo
Applicant
205