41
Case 5:07-cv-00117-FJS-GHL Document 41 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
GREGORY A. BECK
Direct Dial: (202) 588-7713
E-mail: gbeck@citizen.org
August 1, 2007
We represent the plaintiffs in this case. On July 23, 2007, this Court granted in
part our motion for summary judgment and entered a final judgment. Pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1988, plaintiffs are entitled to and intend to move for attorneys’ fees and
expenses. Plaintiffs’ motion would normally be due within fourteen days of judgment,
which in this case would be August 6, 2007. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2)(B). The rules
provide, however, that a court may by order specify a different date. Id.
If plaintiffs were to file their motion for fees by the August 6 deadline and an
appeal were pursued in this case, it would require filing a second motion after the appeal,
which would mean duplicative and unnecessary work for the parties and the Court. The
Attorney General’s office has informed us that defendants have not yet decided whether
to pursue an appeal. The state has an internal review process that it must go through
before making a final decision. Plaintiffs have also not yet decided whether to appeal
those issues on which summary judgment was granted to defendants. If one of the parties
does decide to appeal, the notice of appeal would be due by August 22, 2007.
Because an appeal by at least one party in this case is likely, it makes sense to
postpone plaintiffs’ application for fees until after any appeal is concluded, thereby
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 5:07-cv-00117-FJS-GHL Document 41 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
allowing the parties to resolve all issues of fees and expenses in a single motion.
Therefore, plaintiffs request that the Court enter an order providing that plaintiffs’ motion
for fees, expenses, and costs should be filed no later than 14 days after the expiration of
the period for appeal, or in the event of an appeal, 14 days after the Court of Appeals
disposes of the case or at such time as would be appropriate if further proceedings in this
Court are necessary. A proposed order is attached.
Counsel for defendants have stated that they have no objection to the requested
order.
Respectfully,
/s/Gregory A. Beck
Gregory A. Beck
cc Bridget E. Holohan
Via ECF