Lampiran Output SPSS

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
KATEGORIUMUR * Diagnosis

Missing
Percent

667

100.0%

Total

Percent
0

0.0%

Percent
667

100.0%

KATEGORIUMUR * Diagnosis Crosstabulation

Count
Diagnosis
IM
KATEGORIUMUR

Total

NON IM

TUA

53

429

482

MUDA

30

155

185

83

584

667

Total

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
JenisKelamin * Diagnosis

Missing
Percent

667

100.0%

Count
Diagnosis
IM

NON IM

Percent
0

JenisKelamin * Diagnosis Crosstabulation

Total

Total

0.0%

Percent
667

100.0%

JenisKelamin

PRIA

62

370

432

WANITA

21

214

235

83

584

667

Total

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Hipertensi * Diagnosis

667

Total

Percent

100.0%

0.0%

Percent
667

Hipertensi * Diagnosis Crosstabulation

Count
Diagnosis
IM
Hipertensi

Total

NON IM

HIPERTENSI

53

396

449

NON HIPERTENSI

30

188

218

83

584

667

Total

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
DM * Diagnosis

Missing

Percent
667

100.0%

Percent
0

DM * Diagnosis Crosstabulation
Count
Diagnosis
IM

NON IM

Total

Total

0.0%

Percent
667

100.0%

100.0%

DM

DM

35

159

194

NON DM

48

425

473

83

584

667

Total

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N

Missing

Percent

DISLIPIDEMIA * Diagnosis

667

Total

Percent

100.0%

0.0%

Percent
667

100.0%

DISLIPIDEMIA * Diagnosis Crosstabulation

Count
Diagnosis
IM
DISLIPIDEMIA

Total

NON IM

DISLIPIDEMIA

66

436

502

NON DISLIPIDEMIA

17

148

165

83

584

667

Total

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
DISLIPIDEMIA * Diagnosis

Missing

Percent
667

100.0%

Total

Percent
0

0.0%

DISLIPIDEMIA * Diagnosis Crosstabulation

Count
Diagnosis

Total

Percent
667

100.0%

IM
DISLIPIDEMIA

NON IM

DISLIPIDEMIA

66

436

502

NON DISLIPIDEMIA

17

148

165

83

584

667

Total

Chi-Square Testsc
Value

df

Asymp.

Exact Sig.

Exact

Point

Sig. (2-

(2-sided)

Sig. (1-

Probabilit

sided)

sided)
Pearson Chi-Square

.922a

.337

Continuity Correctionb

.680

.410

Likelihood Ratio

.956

.328

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.921d

.337

.347

.207

.347

.207

.415

.207

.347

.207

.071

667

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.53.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
c. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results.
d. The standardized statistic is .960.

Risk Estimate
Value

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower

Odds Ratio for DISLIPIDEMIA (DISLIPIDEMIA / NON

Upper

1.318

.749

2.318

1.276

.771

2.111

.968

.910

1.030

DISLIPIDEMIA)
For cohort Diagnosis = IM
For cohort Diagnosis = NON IM

N of Valid Cases

667

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
KATEGORIUMUR *

Missing
Percent

667

100.0%

Total

Percent
0

0.0%

Percent
667

100.0%

Diagnosis

KATEGORIUMUR * Diagnosis Crosstabulation

Count
Diagnosis
IM
KATEGORIUMUR

Total

NON IM

TUA

53

429

482

MUDA

30

155

185

83

584

667

Total

Chi-Square Testsc
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

(2-sided)

Exact

Point

Sig.

Probabil

(1-

ity

sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

Likelihood Ratio

3.344a

.067

2.882

.090

3.195

.074

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

3.339

.068

.088

.047

.088

.047

.088

.047

.088

.047

667

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.02.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.020

c. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results.
d. The standardized statistic is -1.827.

Risk Estimate
Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for KATEGORIUMUR (TUA / MUDA)

.638

.393

1.036

For cohort Diagnosis = IM

.678

.448

1.026

1.062

.990

1.140

For cohort Diagnosis = NON IM

N of Valid Cases

667

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
KATEGORIUMUR * Diagnosis

Missing
Percent

667

100.0%

Total

Percent
0

0.0%

Percent

667

100.0%

KATEGORIUMUR * Diagnosis Crosstabulation

Diagnosis
IM
TUA
KATEGORIUMUR
MUDA

Total

Count
% within Diagnosis
Count
% within Diagnosis
Count
% within Diagnosis

Chi-Square Testsc

Total

NON IM
53

429

482

63.9%

73.5%

72.3%

30

155

185

36.1%

26.5%

27.7%

83

584

667

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Value

df

Asymp.

Exact Sig.

Exact

Point

Sig. (2-

(2-sided)

Sig. (1-

Probabili

sided)

ty

sided)
Pearson Chi-Square

3.344a

.067

Continuity Correctionb

2.882

.090

Likelihood Ratio

3.195

.074

Fisher's Exact Test

3.339d

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.068

.088

.047

.088

.047

.088

.047

.088

.047

.020

667

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.02.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
c. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results.
d. The standardized statistic is -1.827.

Risk Estimate
Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for KATEGORIUMUR (TUA / MUDA)

.638

.393

1.036

For cohort Diagnosis = IM

.678

.448

1.026

1.062

.990

1.140

For cohort Diagnosis = NON IM

N of Valid Cases

667

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
JenisKelamin * Diagnosis

Missing
Percent

667

100.0%

Total

Percent
0

0.0%

N
667

JenisKelamin * Diagnosis Crosstabulation

Diagnosis

Total

Percent
100.0%

IM
PRIA
JenisKelamin
WANITA

Count
% within Diagnosis

62

370

432

74.7%

63.4%

64.8%

21

214

235

25.3%

36.6%

35.2%

83

584

667

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Count
% within Diagnosis
Count

Total

% within Diagnosis

NON IM

Chi-Square Testsc
Value

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

Likelihood Ratio

df

Asymp.

Exact

Exact

Point

Sig. (2-

Sig. (2-

Sig. (1-

Probab

sided)

sided)

sided)

ility

4.097a

.043

3.615

.057

4.290

.038

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

4.091

.043

.049

.027

.049

.027

.049

.027

.049

.027

.012

667

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 29.24.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
c. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results.
d. The standardized statistic is 2.023.

Risk Estimate
Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for JenisKelamin (PRIA / WANITA)

1.708

1.012

2.880

For cohort Diagnosis = IM

1.606

1.005

2.566

For cohort Diagnosis = NON IM

.941

.890

.994

N of Valid Cases

667

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
Hipertensi * Diagnosis

Missing
Percent

667

100.0%

Total

Percent
0

0.0%

Percent
667

100.0%

Hipertensi * Diagnosis Crosstabulation

Diagnosis
IM
Count

HIPERTENSI

396

449

63.9%

67.8%

67.3%

30

188

218

36.1%

32.2%

32.7%

83

584

667

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Count

NON HIPERTENSI

% within Diagnosis
Count

Total

% within Diagnosis

NON IM
53

% within Diagnosis

Hipertensi

Total

Chi-Square Testsc
Value

df

Asymp.

Exact Sig.

Exact Sig.

Point

Sig. (2-

(2-sided)

(1-sided)

Probability

sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

Likelihood Ratio

.516a

.473

.352

.553

.509

.476

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.515

.473

.532

.274

.532

.274

.532

.274

.532

.274

667

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27.13.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
c. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results.
d. The standardized statistic is -.718.

.076

Risk Estimate
Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for Hipertensi (HIPERTENSI / NON HIPERTENSI)

.839

.519

1.356

For cohort Diagnosis = IM

.858

.565

1.302

1.023

.960

1.089

For cohort Diagnosis = NON IM

N of Valid Cases

667

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
DM * Diagnosis

Missing
Percent

667

100.0%

Total

Percent
0

0.0%

Percent
667

DM * Diagnosis Crosstabulation
Diagnosis
IM
DM
DM
NON DM

Total

Count
% within Diagnosis
Count
% within Diagnosis
Count
% within Diagnosis

Total

NON IM
35

159

194

42.2%

27.2%

29.1%

48

425

473

57.8%

72.8%

70.9%

83

584

667

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Chi-Square Testsc

100.0%

Value

df

Asymp.

Exact Sig.

Exact

Point

Sig. (2-

(2-sided)

Sig. (1-

Probabilit

sided)

sided)
Pearson Chi-Square

7.867a

.005

Continuity Correctionb

7.159

.007

Likelihood Ratio

7.414

.006

Fisher's Exact Test

7.855d

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.005

.007

.005

.009

.005

.007

.005

.007

.005

667

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 24.14.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
c. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results.
d. The standardized statistic is 2.803.

Risk Estimate
Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for DM (DM / NON DM)

1.949

1.215

3.125

For cohort Diagnosis = IM

1.778

1.189

2.658

For cohort Diagnosis = NON IM

.912

.848

.981

N of Valid Cases

667

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa

N
Included in Analysis

Selected Cases

Missing Cases
Total

Unselected Cases
Total

Percent
667

100.0

.0

667

100.0

.0

667

100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of

cases.

.002

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value

Internal Value

NON IM

IM

Categorical Variables Codings

Frequency

Parameter
coding
(1)

DISLIPIDEMIA

JenisKelamin
Hipertensi
DM

KATEGORIUMUR

DISLIPIDEMIA

502

1.000

NON DISLIPIDEMIA

165

.000

PRIA

432

1.000

WANITA

235

.000

HIPERTENSI

449

1.000

NON HIPERTENSI

218

.000

DM

194

1.000

NON DM

473

.000

TUA

482

1.000

MUDA

185

.000

Classification Tablea,b
Observed

Predicted
Diagnosis
NON IM

Step 0

Diagnosis

NON IM
IM

Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Percentage
Correct

IM

584

100.0

83

.0
87.6

Variables in the Equation

B
Step 0

Constant

S.E.

-1.951

Wald

.117

df

276.635

Sig.
1

.000

Variables not in the Equation

Score

Variables

Step 0

3.344

.067

JenisKelamin(1)

4.097

.043

.516

.473

7.867

.005

.922

.337

18.435

.002

Hipertensi(1)

DISLIPIDEMIA(1)
Overall Statistics

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square

Step 2

Sig.

18.248

.003

Block

18.248

.003

Model

18.248

.003

-.219

.639

Block

18.029

.001

Model

18.029

.001

-.929

.335

Block

17.099

.001

Model

17.099

.001

Step
Step 3a

df

Step

Step
a

Sig.

KATEGORIUMUR(1)

DM(1)

Step 1

df

a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chisquares value has decreased from the previous step.

Model Summary

Exp(B)
.142

Step

-2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R

Nagelkerke R

Square

Square

482.902a

.027

.051

483.122a

.027

.050

484.051a

.025

.048

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because

parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step

Chi-square

df

Sig.

3.150

.871

3.864

.695

1.791

.774

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Diagnosis = NON IM
Observed

Step 1

Step 2

Expected

Diagnosis = IM
Observed

Total

Expected

81

81.215

4.785

86

68

67.576

5.424

73

55

54.487

5.513

60

101

99.741

10

11.259

111

55

53.315

6.685

60

59

59.290

8.710

68

58

59.477

13

11.523

71

34

37.677

12

8.323

46

73

71.222

19

20.778

92

102

101.783

6.217

108

71

72.582

6.418

79

45

42.316

4.684

47

142

139.578

14

16.422

156

59

59.335

8.665

68

Step 3

25

25.158

4.842

30

61

64.762

17

13.238

78

79

78.486

22

22.514

101

102

101.840

6.160

108

50

47.884

5.116

53

199

198.225

21

21.775

220

50

50.448

6.552

57

74

77.051

18

14.949

92

109

108.552

28

28.448

137

Classification Tablea
Observed

Predicted
Diagnosis
NON IM

Step 1

Diagnosis

NON IM
IM

Percentage
Correct

IM

584

100.0

83

.0

Overall Percentage
Step 2

Diagnosis

87.6

NON IM
IM

584

100.0

83

.0

Overall Percentage

Step 3

Diagnosis

87.6

NON IM
IM

584

100.0

83

.0

Overall Percentage

87.6

a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B
)

Step 1a

KATEGORIUMUR(1)
JenisKelamin(1)

-.540

.255

4.488

.034

.583

90% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower

Upper

.383
86

.591

.271

4.745

.029

1.805

1.156

2.820

Hipertensi(1)

-.118

.251

.221

.638

.889

.588

1.343

DM(1)

.773

.247

9.814

.002

2.167

1.444

3.252

DISLIPIDEMIA(1)

.278

.292

.904

.342

1.320

.816

2.136

.414 33.371

.000

.091

-.552

.254

4.740

.029

.576

.379

.874

JenisKelamin(1)

.602

.270

4.969

.026

1.826

1.171

2.847

DM(1)

.769

.246

9.721

.002

2.157

1.438

3.235

DISLIPIDEMIA(1)

.276

.292

.894

.344

1.318

.815

2.132

.383 41.479

.000

.085

-.569

.253

5.055

.025

.566

.373

.858

JenisKelamin(1)

.597

.270

4.883

.027

1.816

1.165

2.831

DM(1)

.764

.246

9.640

.002

2.147

1.432

3.219

.291 59.208

.000

.107

Constant

-2.391

KATEGORIUMUR(1)
Step 2a

Constant

-2.466

KATEGORIUMUR(1)
Step 3a

Constant

-2.236

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: KATEGORIUMUR, JenisKelamin, Hipertensi, DM, DISLIPIDEMIA.

Variables not in the Equation

Score
Step 2a

Step 3b

Variables

Hipertensi(1)

Sig.

.221

.638

.221

.638

Hipertensi(1)

.211

.646

DISLIPIDEMIA(1)

.898

.343

1.119

.572

Overall Statistics
Variables

df

Overall Statistics
a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: Hipertensi.
b. Variable(s) removed on step 3: DISLIPIDEMIA.