International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, March 2015 Vol. 6, No.

3
ISSN: 1837-7823

On Generalized Nearly Lorentzian Manifolds

L K Pandey
D S Institute of Technology & Management, Ghaziabad, U.P. - 201007
dr.pandeylk@rediffmail.com
Abstract
In 2011, R. Nivas and A. Bajpai [6] discussed on generalized Lorentzian Para-Sasakian manifolds. Recently,
the auther [7], [8] studied generalised Lorentzian para Sasakian manifolds and generalized almost para Sasakian
structure.
Hayden [2] introduced the idea of metric connection with torsion tensor in a Riemannian manifold. Yano [9]
and Imai [3] studied the properties of semi-symmetric metric connection in a Riemannian manifold. R.S. Mishra and
S.N. Pandey [4] discussed on Quarter symmetric metric F-connection. Nirmala S. Agashe and Mangala R. Chafle [5]
studied semi-symmetric non-metric connection in a Riemannian manifold. In 2013, Chaubey S.K. and Pandey A.C.
[1] studied the properties of semi-symmetric non-metric connection in Sasakian manifolds.
In this paper generalized nearly Lorentzian manifolds have been discussed and some of their properties
have been established. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the Ricci quarter symmetric metric connection in a
generalized nearly LP-Sasakian manifold.
Keywords: Generalized nearly LP-Sasakian manifolds, generalized nearly LP-Co-symplectic manifolds, Ricci
quarter symmetric metric connection.

1.

Introduction

An n(=2m+1) dimensional Riemannian manifold of class with ( 1) covariant vector fields ,

where = 3,4,5, . . ( 1), the associated ( 1) contravariant vector fields , where = 3,4,5, . . ( 1), a
tensor field of type (1, 1) and a Lorentzian metric , satisfying
2 = + 1
=3 ,

(1.1)

= 0,

( ) = 1,

() = 0,

Rank =
(, ) = (, ) + 1
=3 () (), where () = (, ), = 3,4,5, . . ( 1),

(1.2)

`(, ) ( , ) = `(, ),
Then will be called a generalized Lorentzian Para-Contact manifold (a generalized LP-Contact manifold) and the
structure (, , , ) will be called generalized Lorentzian Para-Contact structure.
Let D be a Riemannian connection on , then we have
(1.3) (a)

1
( `)(, ) + ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( )() =3 ()( )() = 0

(b) ( `)( , 2 ) + ( `)( 2 , ) = 0

(1.4) (a)
(b)

1
( `)( , ) + ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( )() =3 ()( )() = 0

( `)( 2 , 2 ) + ( `)( , ) = 0

A generalized LP-Contact manifold will be called a generalized Lorentzian Para-Sasakian manifold (a generalized
LP-Sasakian manifold) if
(1.5) (a)

1
( )() 2 1
=3 () ( , ) =3 = 0

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, March 2015 Vol. 6, No. 3
ISSN: 1837-7823
(b)

1
( `)(, ) ( , ) 1
=3 () ( , ) =3 () = 0

(c)

= + 1
=3 ,

From which, we obtain

(1.6) (a) ( )() = ( , )
(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=3 () = `(, )
A generalized LP-Contact manifold will be called a generalized Lorentzian Special Para-Sasakian manifold (a
generalized LSP-Sasakian manifold) if
1
( )() 1
=3 () `(, ) =3 = 0

(1.7) (a)
(b)

1
( `)(, ) `(, ) 1
=3 () `(, ) =3 () = 0

(c)

= 2 + 1
=3

From which, we obtain

(1.8) (a) ( )( ) = `(, )
(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=3 () = ( , )
A generalized LP-Contact manifold will be called a generalized Lorentzian Para-Co-symplectic manifold (a
generalized LP-Co-symplectic manifold) if
1
( ) 1
=3 () =3 ( )( ) = 0

(1.9) (a)
(b)

1
( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( )() =3 ()( )() = 0

Therefore a generalized LP-Co-symplectic manifold is a generalized LP-Sasakian manifold if

(1.10) (a) ( )( ) = ( , )

(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=3 () = `(, )

(c) = + 1
=3
Also a generalized LP-Co-symplectic manifold is a generalized LSP-Sasakian manifold if
(1.11) (a)

( )( ) = `(, )

1
2
(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=3 () = ( , ) (c) = + =3

Nijenhuis tensor in a generalized LP-Contact manifold is given as

(1.12)
Where

2.

`(, , ) = ( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) + ( `)(, )

`(, , ) (( , ), )

Generalized Nearly Lorentzian Para-Sasakian manifolds

A generalized LP-contact manifold will be called a generalized nearly Lorentzian Para-Sasakian manifold
(a generalized nearly LP-Sasakian manifold) if
1
(2.1) ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( , ) =3 ()( , )
1
= ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( , ) =3 ()( , )

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, March 2015 Vol. 6, No. 3
ISSN: 1837-7823
1
= ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( , ) =3 ()( , )

From which, we obtain

1
2
2
(2.2) (a) i( ) ( ) 1
=3 () + =3 () = 0
1
(b) ( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( , ) + =3 ()( , ) = 0

From which, we obtain

(2.3) (a)
(b)
(2.4) (a)
(b)

( ) ( ) + 1
=3 () = 0
( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) + 1
=3 () `(, ) = 0
2
( ) 2 (2 ) + 1
=3 () = 0

( `)( 2 , ) (2 `)(, ) + 1
=3 ()( , ) = 0

1
2
(2.5)(a) ( ) ( ) 1
=3 (){ + ( )} + =3 () = 0
1
(b) ( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) 1
=3 (){( )( ) + ( `)( , )} + =3 ()( , ) = 0

Pre-multiplying , , by in (1.12) and using equations (2.1), (1.3) (b), we get `( , , ) = 0, which
implies that a generalized nearly LP-Sasakian manifold is completely integrable.

3.

Generalized nearly Lorentzian Special Para-Sasakian manifold

A generalized LP-contact manifold will be called a generalized nearly Lorentzian Special Para-Sasakian
manifold (a generalized nearly LSP-Sasakian manifold) if
1
(3.1) ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()`(, ) =3 () `(, )
1
= ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()`(, ) =3 () `(, )
1
= ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()`(, ) =3 () `(, )

From which, we obtain

(3.2) (a)

1
( ) ( ) 1
=3 () + =3 () = 0

1
(b) ( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) 1
=3 () `(, ) + =3 () `(, ) = 0

This gives
(3.3) (a)
(b)
(3.4) (a)
(b)

2
( ) ( ) + 1
=3 () = 0

( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) + 1
=3 ()( , ) = 0
( ) 2 (2 ) + 1
=3 () = 0
( `)( 2 , ) (2 `)(, ) + 1
=3 ()`(, ) = 0

1
(3.5) (a) ( ) ( ) 1
=3 (){ + ( )} + =3 () = 0
1
(b)( `)(, ) ( `)(, ) 1
=3 (){( )( ) + ( `)( , )} + =3 () `(, ) = 0

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, March 2015 Vol. 6, No. 3
ISSN: 1837-7823
Pre-multiplying , , by in (1.12) and using equations (3.1), (1.3) (b), we get `( , , ) = 0, which
implies that a generalized nearly LSP-Sasakian manifold is completely integrable.

4.

Generalized Nearly Lorentzian Para-Co-symplectic manifold

A generalized LP-Contact manifold will be called a generalized nearly Lorentzian Para-Co-symplectic manifold (a
generalized nearly LP-Co-symplectic manifold) if
1
( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( )( ) =3 ()( )( )

(4.1)

1
= ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( )( ) =3 ()( )( )
1
= ( `)(, ) 1
=3 ()( )( ) =3 ()( )( )

Therefore, a generalized nearly LP-Sasakian manifold is a generalized nearly LP-Co-symplectic manifold, in which
(4.2) (a) ( )( ) = ( , )
(c) = + 1
=3

(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=3 () = `(, )

Also a generalized nearly LSP-Sasakian manifold is a generalized nearly LP-Co-symplectic manifold, in which
(4.3) (a)

( )( ) = `(, )

1
2
(b) ( )( ) () + 1
=3 () = ( , ) (c) = + =3

5.

Generalized Ricci quarter symmetric metric connection

Let 21 be submanifold of 2+1 and let 21 2+1 be the inclusion map such that
21 2+1 ,

Where induces a Jacobian map (linear transformation)

21 2+1 .

21 is tangent space to 21 at point and 2+1 is tangent space to 2+1 at point such that
in 21 at in 2+1 at
Let be the induced metric tensor in 21 . Then
(5.1)

(, ) = (( ( , ))

Let B be an affine connection in a generalized nearly LP-Sasakian manifold , then B is said to be a metric
connection if
(5.2)

= 0

Connection B is said to be a generalized Ricci quarter symmetric connection if its torsion tensor S is given by
(5.3)

(, ) = () (), where = 3,4,5, . . ( 1)

and is the (1,1) Ricci tensor defined by

(5.4)

(, ) = (, )

Therefore, Ricci quarter symmetric metric connection in is given by

(5.5)

1
= + 1
=3 () =3 (, )

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, March 2015 Vol. 6, No. 3
ISSN: 1837-7823

Where and are arbitrary vector fields of 2+1. If

(5.6)

= + + , where = 3,4,5, . . ( 1).

Also , where = 3,4,5, . . ( 1), are vector fields in 21 and and are unit normal vectors to 21 .
Denoting by the connection induced on the submanifold from , we have Gauss equation
(5.7)

= ( ) + (, ) + (, )

Where and are symmetric bilinear functions in 21 . Similarly

= ( ) + (, ) + (, ) ,

(5.8)

Where is the connection induced on the submanifold from and and are symmetric bilinear functions in
21 .
Inconsequence of (5.5), we have
(5.9)

= + 1
=3 ( ) =3 ( , )

From (5.7), (5.8) and (5.9), we obtain

(5.10)

( ) + (, ) + (, ) = ( ) + (, ) + (, ) + 1
=3 ( )
1
=3 (, )

Using (5.6), we get

(5.11)

( ) + (, ) + (, ) = ( ) + (, ) + (, ) + 1
=3 ( )

1
=3 ( + + ) ( , )

) ( )
Where
(,
This gives
(5.12)
Iff
(5.13) (a)

1


= + 1
=3 ( ) =3 ( , )

(, ) = (, ) 1
=3 ( , )

(b) (, ) = (, ) 1
=3 ( , )
Therefore, we have
Theorem 5.1 The connection induced on a submanifold of a generalized nearly LP-Sasakian manifold with a
generalized Ricci quarter symmetric metric connection with respect to unit normal vectors and is also
generalized Ricci quarter symmetric metric connection iff (5.13) holds.

References
[1] Chaubey, S.K. and Pandey, A.C., (2013) Some Properties of a Semi-symmetric Non-metric Connection on a
Sasakian Manifold, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 16, pp. 789-799.
[2] Hayden, H. A., (1932) Subspaces of a space with torsion, Proc. London Math. Soc., 34, pp. 27-50.
[3] Imai, T., (1972) Hypersurfaces of a Riemannian manifold with semi-symmetric metric connection,
Tensor N. S.23, pp. 300-306.

International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, March 2015 Vol. 6, No. 3
ISSN: 1837-7823
[4] Mishra, R.S.. and Pandey, S.N. (1980) On Quarter symmetric metric F-connections, Tensor N. S., 34,pp. 1-7.
[5] Nirmala S. Agashe and Mangala R. Chafle, (1992) A Semi-symmetric non-metric connection on a Riemmanian
manifold, Indian J. pure appl. Math., 23(6), pp. 399-409.
[6] Nivas, R. and Bajpai, A. (2011) Study of generalized Lorentzian para-Sasakian manifolds, Journal of
International Academy of Physical Sciences, Vol. 15 No.4, pp. 405-412.
[7] Pandey, L. K., (2014) Generalised LP-Sasakian manifolds, International journal of computational
Intelligence and information sec. Vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 20-25.
[8] Pandey, L. K., (2014) A Note on Generalized almost Para-Sasakian Structure, International journal of
Computational Intelligence and information sec. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 4-9.
[9] Yano, K. (1970) On semi-symmetric metric connection, Rev. Roum. Math. pures et appl. tome XV, No 9,
Bucarest, pp. 1579-1584.