This
topic
page
includes
introductory
information,
a
list
of
readings,
and
questions
to
guide
your
reading
and
prepare
you
for
class
discussion;
it
may
also
include
an
individual
or
group
assignment,
which
may
or
may
not
be
graded.
References
to
ABO
are
to
Alred,
Brusaw,
and
Oliu
(2015).
Introduction
Writing
instructors
will
often
refer
to
the
rhetorical
situation.
This
term
has
its
roots
in
an
article
by
Llyod
Bitzer
(1968),
though
broadly
speaking
the
concept
goes
back
at
least
as
far
as
Aristotle.
When
you
are
writing
a
text
(or
creating
a
communication
in
another
mode),
the
rhetorical
situation
consists
of
everything
you
know
about
the
situation
into
which
you
are
introducing
your
text.
It
includes
at
least
the
following
four
things:
1. The
writers
purpose.
2. The
audience
or
readers.
3. The
material
and
social
context.
4. The
available
media
or
modes
of
communication.
(We
will
talk
often
this
semester
about
W.O.V.E.NWritten,
Oral,
Visual,
Electronic,
and
Nonverbalmodes,
but
even
that
list
is
arguably
not
complete.)
These
four
things
can
interact
in
sophisticated
ways.
For
example,
part
of
understanding
your
audience
is
knowing
what
they
think
you
think
the
rhetorical
situation
is.
In
other
words,
they
are
also
thinking
about
your
purpose
(as
well
as
their
own),
what
they
think
you
know
about
them,
and
their
own
views
of
the
material
and
social
context.
Context
is
a
critically
important
component,
and
there
are
several
questions
you
should
answer
when
preparing
to
write.
Consider
those
in
the
ABO
entry
for
context.
It
is
important
for
a
communicator
to
be
imaginative
at
this
stage,
to
think
about
the
audience
members,
what
they
may
just
have
been
doing
before
receiving
the
communication,
what
their
feelings
and
beliefs
might
be,
etc.
Cultural
and
physical
factors
can
influence
your
audiences
view
of
the
context.
For
example,
a
visually
impaired
audience
member
might
not
be
in
a
position
to
take
note
of
some
material
characteristic
of
the
environment
that
you
think
is
patently
obvious.
A
social
context
can
also
give
rise
what
is
sometimes
called
a
genre,
which
is
really
just
a
typified
formal
response
to
a
recurring
rhetorical
situation
(Miller,
1984).
So,
for
example,
if
everyone
in
your
lab
writes
lab
reports
in
a
certain
way
(and
has
done
so
for
years),
you
might
want
to
use
that
report
format
even
though
you
think
that
another
report
format
would
be
more
efficient.
The
expectations
of
your
audience
can
thus
function
to
constrain
your
communicative
choices.
But
we
will
also
talk
about
how
you
can
overcome
conventional
approaches
if
you
lay
the
proper
groundwork.
Page 1
preparation
purpose
audience
readers
context
Review
each
of
the
following
communications
and
consider
what
might
have
been
the
audience,
purpose,
and
context
for
it:
The
syllabus
for
this
course.
University
of
Minnesota
Brand
Policy:
http://www.policy.umn.edu/Policies/Operations/OPMisc/BRANDING.html
Hammering
on
lesson
on
acoustic
guitar.
View
this
video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9xjT9zVVQU
Department
of
Defense,
Report
of
the
Comprehensive
Review
of
the
Issues
Associated
with
a
Repeal
of
"Don't
Ask
Don't
Tell":
https://www.scribd.com/doc/274876149/Department-
of-Defense-2010-DADT-Report
The
front
materials
and
executive
summary
(through
page
17).
Reading
questions
1. According
to
ABO,
the
writers
purpose
can
often
best
be
summed
up
with
answers
to
which
two
one-word
questions?
2. As
you
read
the
definition
of
audience,
you
will
notice
that
many
words
are
in
bold
text
and
underlined.
This
formatting
indicates
that
there
are
entries
for
these
terms
elsewhere
in
ABO.
Select
a
couple
of
terms
from
the
definition
of
audienceincluding
at
least
readersand
go
to
read
their
definitions.
Come
to
class
prepared
to
summarize
the
entry
for
one
of
these
terms.
Do
you
think
the
entry
for
readers
adds
much
to
the
entry
for
audience?
The
entry
identifies
an
approach
for
segmenting
a
text
for
diverse
readers,
including
managers,
technical
specialists,
and
decision-makers:
Which
segments
does
ABO
say
will
be
useful
to
each
group?
3. The
ABO
entry
for
context
describes
two
stages
where
the
writer
should
address
context.
What
are
they?
What
do
you
suppose
is
the
key
benefit
of
signaling
context?
Discuss:
As
an
analyst,
what
distinguishes
the
rhetorical
situations
in
the
examples
for
you?
Is
it
easier
or
harder
for
the
writer
when
the
rhetorical
situation
is
less
well
understood
or
known?
Works
cited
Alred,
G.
J.,
Brusaw,
C.
T.,
&
Oliu,
W.
E.
(2015).
Handbook
of
Technical
Writing
(11th
edition).
Boston:
Bedford/St.
Martins.
Bitzer,
L.
(1968).
The
rhetorical
situation.
Philosophy
&
Rhetoric,
1(1),
114.
Miller,
C.
R.
(1984).
Genre
as
Social
Action.
Quarterly
Journal
of
Speech,
70(2),
151167.
http://doi.org/Article
2015
Brian
N.
Larson
Page 2