!t
st~p
Fig. 2 Vrbljani,
- The Bosnia end,
Gornji
and
Herzegowina
maja.pctril1(,c ~1 mhas-split.hr
I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
194
Maj a Petrinec
Fig. 3 - The rel iquary of St. Anselm, Nin, upan ija Zadarska, Croat ia
srh
' -l
II
195
196
Ullo II, Gater,j<inoshida, Mistelbach) (KAvANo
VA 1995, s. 190). They are followed by one recip
ient from grave 116 in Devinska Nova Ves that is
decorated with a carved reticular ornament,
which can be dated to the late 8th century on the
basis of accompanying finds (KAVANOVA 1995,
. 190). In addition to the aforementioned ones,
are the predominantley ornamented recipients
from the Transdanubian cemeteries of Sopron
k6hida (TOROK 1973, s. 47-49), ZalaszabarDe
sz6sz iget (MULLER 1992, s. 288, T. 74), Eszter
ga lyhorvati-Als6barandpusztaand others, dated
to the 9th century, and a specimen from the same
time ornamented with a notched zigzag line dis
covered in grave 18 at the Pitten cemetery in
Lower Austria (FRlESINGER 1975-1977, T. 14, G .
XVIII). T -shaped recipients also appear in the re
gion of Moravia. All these specimens discovered
so far originate from the settlement strata at the
sites of Mikulice , Bfeclav-Pohansko and Stare
Zamky (KAVANOVA 1995, S. 190-191). They are
dated to the end of the pre-Great Moravian pe
riod and lasted until the late Great Moravian pe
riod , aPfroximately from the second quarter
of the 9 t century to the first half of the 10th cen
tury. Chronologically dating to the same or
somewhat earlier times are related finds from the
Czech region (Libice, Levy Hradec), and later,
dated to the 11 th century, the individual T-shaped
specimens found in settlements of the early Sla
vic period in the region of Germany (e.g. Lod
digsee) (HERMANN 1985, s. 281).
Various proposals have been suggested re
garding the function of the three-branched re
cipients. However, the prevailing opinion is that
they are objects of a ceremoniaI character, be
longing to funeral requisites of distinguished
men. These men have had significant roles in
both secular and religious rituals. Although not
precisely confirmed, it is assumed that the recip
ients contained salt, which had a specific fun
ction in these activities, like in the example of the
widespread custom of offering bread and salt
during the ceremony of welcome, which has
been retained in some regions until the present.
Besides salt, possibly spices or medical herbs
have been kept in these recipi ents. Individual
finds suggest that three-branched recipients had
stoppers. The remains of a wooden stopper have
been discovered next to a recipi ent at the Ger
man site of Loddigsee. On e specimen has also
been discovered at Pitten in Austria that con
tained a tin stopper with a handIe and iron chain,
Maja Petrinec
and was reinforced with bronze rivets in the cen
tre. Due to the fact that the majority of the finds
was positioned at the waist level of the deceased
and due to small holes on all three branches, it is
assumed that they were hung on a belt.
Particularly interesting are the decorated spec
imens from grave 161 at drijac and a similar
recipient from evrske. These two are closely re
lated to a recipient from grave 48 in Sopronkohi
da. They are all omamented with depictions of the
tree of life, next to which are two animals. They
only differ in the designed ornamentation and in
dividual details. The ornamentation on the re
cipient from drijac is carved, while the other two
are formed from chiseled triangles.
The aforementioned depictions are various
Iy interpreted and therefore opinions differ con
cerning the origins of these objects. Beloevi
and Torok assume that they display religious
scenes connected to a shamanistic cult of the
dead. According to such an interpretation, sad
dIed and bridled horses are depicted next to the
tree oflife as they represent animals that carry the
dead, wearing head masks of horned livestock
(bulls). Beloevi concludes that the antler re
cipients are Avarian cultural goods that Croats
obtained as spoils during the wars betwee n the
Franks and Avars in the late 8 th century (BELO
EVI 1980, s. 125-128). Certain Croatian authors
consider these objects to be Croatian cultural
goods and seek an explanation for the symbolism
of the depictions within the Iranian cultural cir
cle (SMILJANI, SAMBUNJAK 1982, s. 67-76). The
most convincing interpretations are those that
point out the similarity to the Christian world,
i.e. they assume that the significance of the sym
bols on these objects already exhibited Christian
religious properties (PEJAKOVI, GATTIN 1988,
s. 207-208; DRAGI EVI 1993, s. 63-74; VOJVODA
1992, s. 141-144). It is primarily important to
stress the depiction of the cross, which indis
putably must be viewed as a Christian symbol.
The entire ornamentation on the specimen from
drijac could be explained as the tree oflife in
Heavenly Jerusalem, from which grows a fruit
symbolized by the cross, i.e. Christ's monogram,
with animals recognized as deer and antelapes.
In the depiction on the recipient from evrske,
the tree of life is emphasized by four-peta I
rosettes, which also ends in a cross with wide
arms. The animals by the tree are oxen, which in
Christianity symbolize suffering for the benefit
of others. Besides the aforementioned, the source
Cross-Shaped Applique
The cross-shaped applique that has been discov
ered on the chest of a deceased woman in grave
324 at drijac in Nin (fig. 7) is made ofbronze
in the casting technique and gilded. It has equal
ly long arms, which contain two oval attachments
with eyelets at their bottom ends. These have
been mostly used for pins in order to attach them
to the attire. The appliqu's arms have been dec
orated in relief printing with stylized human fig
ures that have accentuated hair, eyes and noses,
with their arms lifted, i.e. they are displayed in
the adorant position. The centre of the cross, re
spectively in the root of the arms, shows four hu
man masks in the relief-printing technique.
A certain affinity of the cross from drijac
to the bronze cross-shaped fibulae, which are
rounded and carved with concentric circles and
197
198
one little cross that has been discovered in the
cultural strata next to the so-called fifth church
in Mikulice and in a similar, not entirely pre
served, small cross, that is threaded onto a neck
lace , which has been found in the child 's grave
71 ne>..1: to the rotunda St. Peter in Bude in the
Czech Republic (OLLE 1980, s. 269, figo 3,2,
s. 359, T. II). There, it has been in secondary us
age. Due to the fact that both crosses are also
decorated with human masks, they are associat
ed with the Blatnica style. Human masks appear
on the cross-guard of the Carolingian sword,
strap fittings and harness fittings from the
eponymic site Blatnica in Slovakia (BENDA 1963,
s. 201, figo 1, s. 213, figo 16). With regard to the
cross from drijac, the cross-shaped strap fitting
is particularly interesting. Its arms are decorated
with mirrored placed human figures and with
four relief-produced masks in the protruding
central part. They are arranged between the plas
tic-shaped St. Andrew's cross.
Reliefillustrations of human masks and ado
rants are found at certain locations in southwest
ern Slovakia in the late horizon of the cast bronze.
Some cemeteries of this horizon disclose finds
that can be, in the broader sense, connected to the
Blatnica style. A peculiar decorated headgear of a
horse, discovered in grave 10 at the site ZitavsIci
Ton , particularly stands out (BUDINSKY-KRIKA
1956, s. 57-58, figo 17). It consists of one larger
fitting that is made of six bronze gilded human
masks, which are interconnected by the St. An
drew's cross and attached to the frontal strap, and
three smaller fittings that consist of three inter
connected identical masks from the headgear's
side strap. Bronze, sometimes gilded wether
belIs, decorated with human masks (itavska
Ton, Komarno, Nove Zamky), have been no
ticed in the same cultural and chronological hori
zon. In the Moravian region, this type of decora
tion appears also on some other craftwork objects
from the late 9th century, such as the bronze gild
ed spur, which is decorated with human masks
and discovered in the luxuriant grave 44 next
to the so-called second church in Mikulice
(POULiK 1975, T. 34).
In the light of the given facts, it can be as
sumed that the cross from drijac has its origin
in the cross-shaped fibulae of the early Carolin
gian age. Its presence on cemeteries, which most
ly belong to the horizon of paga n burial customs,
as well as in some other cases when talking about
the respective fibulae, can be linked to the be-
Maja Petrinec
ginning of Christianization. Such conclusion
complies with historical information; and the
presence of the first missionaries in our region at
the end of the 8 th century is verified by several
aforementioned significant sacra l artifacts from
the early Carolingian cultural circle such as
thurible from the source of the Cetina river. The
cross from drijac however is linked, by the re
lief illustrations of adorants and human masks,
to certain finds that belong to the Blatnica style,
which is characteristic for the area of the
Carpathian Basin at the end of the wars between
the Franks and Avars and right at the beginning
of the 9 th century.
199
200
Maja Petrinec
References
J.
BELOEVI
1980
BENDA K.
1963
BUDINSKy-KRI KA
V.
Pohrebisko z neskorej doby avarske v itavskej Toni na Slovensku, Slovenska A rcheol6gia , N-l,
Bratislava, p. 5-131.
1956
CETINI .
1998
Strane-Gorica, starohrvatsko groblj e, Rijeka.
DELONGA
V.
Pismenost karolinkog doba i njeni hrvatski odjeci - latinska epigrafika batina u hrvatskim kra
jevima, [in:] Hrvati i karolinzi (Rasprave i lIrela), Split, p. 216-249.
2000
DRAGI EVI
1993
J.
EISNER
1952
FRIESINGER
HERMANN
J.
1985
HRVATI
I KAROLINZI
2000
B.
KAVANovA
Knochen- und Geweihindustrie in Mikulice, [in:] StudiaI z um Burgwall von Mikul&e, vo!. l ,
Brno.
1995
MILOEVI
A.
Karolinki utjecaji u kneevini Hrvatskoj, [in:] Hrvati i karolir/zi (Rasprave i vrela), Split, p. 106-139.
2000
R.
MULLER
1992
PEJAKOVI
1988
PETRINE C
2002
POULIK
H.
Studien zur Archaologie der Slawen in Nieder6sterreich II, Mitteihlllgen der prallistorischen Kom
mission der Osterreichisdlell Akademie der Wissenschaften, XVII-XVIII vo!., Wien.
1975-1977
Graberfeld und Siedlungreste aus der Karolingerzeit von Zalaszabar-Deszosziget, Die Karoli n
gerzeit im unteren Zalatal, An/aeus Comllluni<:ationes ex Instituta Archaeologico Academiae ScimtanJI11
Hrmgaricae 21, Budapest, p. 271-560.
M.,
GATTIN
N.
Dosadanji rezultati istraivanja ranosrednjovjekovnog groblja u Glavicama kraj Sinja kao pri
log razrjeavanju problema kronologije starohrvatskih grobalja, Opuscula Archaeologica, vol. 26,
Zagreb, p. 257-273.
J.
1975
SMILJANI
1982
STEIN
M .
Simbolika ukrasnih motiva na roinama iz grobova nekropole N in-drijac, Adrias 4-5, Split,
p.63-74
Mikulice,
F., SAMBUNJAK S.
O besmrtnosti i svjetlosti kazuju kosti, Dometi, vo!. 12, Rijeka, p. 67-76.
F .
1967
M.
1980
TOROK
Budi
201
Gy.
Sopronk6hida IX. szazadi temet6je, Fontes Archaeologici Hungariae, Budapest.
1973
TOVORNIK
V.
1986
VOJVODA
1992
Die friihmittelalterlichen Graberfelder von Gusen und Auhofbei Perg in Oberosterreich, Teil 2:
Auhofbei Perg, Archaeologia Ausfriaea, vol. 70, Wien, p. 413-483.
P.
Prilog itanju starohrvatskih simbola, [in :] Arheoloka istraivanja u Kl1;1lU i Kllinskoj krajini, IzdaIlja
Hrvatskog arheolokog dmfva 15 (1990), Zagreb, p. 141-144.