www.elsevier.com/locate/jcsr
Abstract
This paper describes a series of tests on steel tubular columns of circular and square section filled with normal concrete and recycled aggregate
concrete. Thirty specimens, including 24 recycled aggregate concrete filled steel tubular (RACFST) columns and 6 normal concrete filled steel
tubular (CFST) columns, were tested to investigate the influence of variations in the tube shape, circular or square, concrete type, normal concrete
and recycled aggregate concrete, and load eccentricity ratio, from 0 to 0.53 on the performance of such composite columns. The test results show
that both types of filled columns failed due to overall buckling. Comparisons are made with predicted ultimate strengths of RACFST columns using
the existing codes, such as ACI 318-1999, AIJ-1997, AISC-LRFD-1999, BS5400-1979, DBJ13-51-2003 and EC4-1994. A theoretical model for
normal CFST columns is adopted in this paper for RACFST columns. The predicted load versus deformation relationships are in good agreement
with test results.
c 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Recycled aggregate concrete filled steel tube (RACFST); Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC); Composite columns; Composite action; Ultimate strength;
Design codes
1. Introduction
Hollow structural steel (HSS) sections are often filled with
concrete to form a composite column. Such kinds of composite
columns have been the interest of structural engineers for
their high load bearing capacity, saving formwork, small
cross section over reinforced concrete structures, and high fire
resistance over the steel structures (ASCCS [6]).
Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) can be recognized as a
new kind of concrete construction, in which broken pieces of
waste concrete are used as aggregate. Due to the low strength
and elastic modulus, bad workability, high water infiltration and
high shrinkage and creep of RAC, they are only used as nonstructural concrete mostly (Ajdukiewicz and Kliszczewicz [5],
Sagoe-Crentsil et al. [18]). However, RAC is well recognized
in view of its low thermal conductivity, low brittleness as
Corresponding author at: Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua
University, Beijing 100084, Peoples Republic of China. Tel.: +86 10
62797067; fax: +86 10 62781488.
E-mail address: lhhan@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn (L.-H. Han).
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
1311
Nomenclature
CFST
CHS
D
e
e/ro
Ec
Es
f cu
Axial shortening, in mm
Strain
Stress
Steel
section
Dimension
of section
D t (mm)
Tensile
Yielding
strength
strength
f sy (MPa) f u (MPa)
Yielding
Modulus of
ratio
elasticity E s
Y ( f sy / f u ) (MPa)
CHS
SHS
-165 2.57
-150 2.94
343.1
344.4
0.81
0.76
423.6
450.5
1.79 105
2.07 105
1312
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
Table 2
The mix proportions and properties of the new concrete
Type of
concrete
NCA
RCA
Water
W/C
Cement Sand
(kg/m3 ) (kg/m3 ) (kg/m3 ) (kg/m3 ) (kg/m3 )
28-day cube
strength, f cu (MPa)
Test-day cube
(MPa)
strength, f cu
Modulus of
elasticity, E c (MPa)
Slump
(mm)
Normal
concrete
Recycled
aggregate
concrete
414
630
1170
414
630
878
414
630
585
207
0.5
42.7
50.8
2.75 104
40
292
(25%)
585
(50%)
207
0.5
41.8
46.7
2.61 104
35
207
0.5
36.6
44.1
2.46 104
33
Table 3
Specimen labels and member capacities
Section types
Circular
Square
No.
Specimen labels
D t (mm)
L (mm)
e (mm)
e/ro
Nue (kN)
Measured value
Average value
SLI (%)
CA0
-165 2.57
1650
1217
1217
2
3
CA1-1
CA1-2
-165 2.57
1650
1650
0
0
0
0
1158
1158
1158
4.8
4
5
CA2-1
CA2-2
-165 2.57
-165 2.57
1650
1650
0
0
0
0
1090
1123
1106.5
9.1
CB0
-165 2.57
1650
20
0.24
877
877
7
8
CB1-1
CB1-2
-165 2.57
1650
1650
20
20
0.24
0.24
817
855
836
4.7
9
10
CB2-1
CB2-2
-165 2.57
-165 2.57
1650
1650
20
20
0.24
0.24
795
805
800
8.8
11
CC0
-165 2.57
1650
40
0.48
615
615
12
13
CC1-1
CC1-2
-165 2.57
1650
1650
40
40
0.48
0.48
602
607
604.5
1.7
14
15
CC2-1
CC2-2
-165 2.57
1650
1650
40
40
0.48
0.48
600
602
601
2.3
-165 2.57
-165 2.57
-165 2.57
-165 2.57
SA0
-150 2.94
1732
1285
1285
2
3
SA1-1
SA1-2
-150 2.94
-150 2.94
1732
1732
0
0
0
0
1260
1273
1266.5
1.4
4
5
SA2-1
SA2-2
-150 2.94
-150 2.94
1732
1732
0
0
0
0
1252
1245
1248.5
2.8
SB0
-150 2.94
1732
20
0.27
910
910
7
8
SB1-1
SB1-2
-150 2.94
-150 2.94
1732
1732
20
20
0.27
0.27
842
875
858.5
5.7
9
10
SB2-1
SB2-2
-150 2.94
-150 2.94
1732
1732
20
20
0.27
0.27
825
835
830
8.8
11
SC0
-150 2.94
1732
40
0.53
740
740
12
13
SC1-1
SC1-2
-150 2.94
-150 2.94
1732
1732
40
40
0.53
0.53
686
632
659
10.9
14
15
SC2-1
SC2-2
-150 2.94
-150 2.94
1732
1732
40
40
0.53
0.53
625
655
640
13.5
coupons were cut from the flat part of the tube. The 0.2% proof
stress was adopted as the yielding strength. From these tests,
the average yielding strength ( f sy ), tensile strength ( f u ), and
modulus of elasticity (E s ) of the steel tubes are listed in Table 1.
Three types of concrete mixes were prepared. The mix was
designed for compressive cube strength ( f cu ) at 28 days of
approximately 40 MPa. In producing RAC, in place of natural
coarse aggregate (NCA), portions of 25% and 50% recycled
coarse aggregate (RCA) were added as coarse aggregate. RCA
were obtained by crushing waste concrete, which was taken
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
(a) CA series.
(a) SA series.
(b) CB series.
(b) SB series.
(c) CC series.
(c) SC series.
1313
1314
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
(a) CB1-1.
(b) SB1-1.
(a) CA series.
(b) CB series.
(c) CC series.
Fig. 7. Axial load (N )axial shortening () responses (circular specimens).
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
1315
(a) SA series.
(b) SB series.
(c) SC series.
Fig. 8. Axial load (N )axial shortening () responses (square specimens).
1316
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
model of this paper and the literature (Han and Yao [11]; Han
et al. [14]).
Typical axial load (N) versus axial shortening () responses
of the composite columns are shown in Figs. 7 and 8. It can
be seen that the ultimate strength of the columns filled with
recycled aggregate concrete is lower than the corresponding
normal CFST columns, and generally RACFST columns
undergo higher deformation than normal CFST columns.
The load (N) versus lateral deflection (u m ) responses of
normal CFST and RACFST columns are presented in Figs. 9
and 10, where u m is the lateral deflection at mid-height of the
column. It can be found that the type of in-fill concrete almost
has no influence on the shape of Nu m curves of the composite
columns. The ultimate loads (Nue ) of RACFST columns
are lower than the corresponding normal CFST specimens,
and the value of Nue decreases with the increasing of the
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
1317
Fig. 9. (continued)
(1)
1318
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
Fig. 10. Load (N ) versus mid-height lateral deflection (u m ) curves (square specimens).
ACI318-99 [2]
AIJ [3]
AISC-LRFD [4]
BS5400 [7]
DBJ13-51-2003 [8] (The equations were listed in detail in
Han et al. [12,13])
EC4 [9].
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
1319
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Specimen
CA1-1
CA1-2
CA2-1
CA2-2
CB1-1
CB1-2
CB2-1
CB2-2
CC1-1
CC1-2
CC2-1
CC2-2
Nue
(kN)
1158
1158
1090
1123
817
855
795
805
602
607
600
602
ACI 318-99
(1999)
N uc
Nuc
N ue
(kN)
AIJ (1997)
Nuc
(kN)
N uc
N ue
757
757
736
736
757
757
736
736
562
562
549
549
1092
1092
1055
1055
733
733
708
708
580
580
562
562
0.943
0.943
0.968
0.939
0.897
0.857
0.891
0.88
0.963
0.956
0.937
0.934
0.654
0.654
0.675
0.655
0.927
0.885
0.926
0.914
0.934
0.926
0.915
0.912
AISC-LRFD
(1999)
N uc
Nuc
N ue
(kN)
BS5400 (1979)
Nuc
(kN)
N uc
N ue
1022
1022
988
988
574
574
563
563
399
399
394
394
1188
1188
1155
1155
715
715
698
698
512
512
500
500
1.026
1.026
1.06
1.028
0.875
0.836
0.878
0.867
0.85
0.843
0.833
0.831
0.883
0.883
0.906
0.88
0.703
0.671
0.708
0.699
0.663
0.657
0.657
0.654
DBJ13-51-2003
(2003)
N uc
Nuc
N ue
(kN)
EC4 (1994)
Nuc
(kN)
N uc
N ue
1067
1067
1039
1039
710
710
693
693
535
535
522
522
1132
1132
1091
1091
889
889
860
860
673
673
658
658
0.978
0.978
1.001
0.972
1.088
1.04
1.082
1.068
1.118
1.109
1.097
1.093
0.921
0.921
0.953
0.925
0.869
0.83
0.872
0.861
0.889
0.881
0.87
0.867
Mean value
0.831
0.926
0.747
0.913
0.888
1.052
COV
(Coefficient of variation)
0.128
0.036
0.106
0.092
0.035
0.055
1320
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
(a) e/ro = 0.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Specimen
SA1-1
SA1-2
SA2-1
SA2-2
SB1-1
SB1-2
SB2-1
SB2-2
SC1-1
SC1-2
SC2-1
SC2-2
Nue
(kN)
1260
1273
1252
1245
842
875
825
835
686
632
625
655
ACI 318-99
(1999)
N uc
Nuc
N ue
(kN)
AIJ (1997)
Nuc
(kN)
N uc
N ue
906
906
883
883
900
900
877
877
685
685
670
670
1227
1227
1189
1189
863
863
838
838
679
679
660
660
0.974
0.964
0.95
0.955
1.025
0.986
1.016
1.004
0.99
1.074
1.056
1.008
0.719
0.712
0.705
0.709
1.069
1.029
1.063
1.05
0.999
1.084
1.072
1.023
AISC-LRFD
(1999)
N uc
Nuc
N ue
(kN)
BS5400 (1979)
Nuc
(kN)
N uc
N ue
1180
1180
1145
1145
720
720
707
707
518
518
511
511
1165
1165
1131
1131
770
770
751
751
575
575
563
563
0.925
0.915
0.903
0.908
0.914
0.88
0.91
0.899
0.838
0.91
0.901
0.86
0.937
0.927
0.915
0.92
0.855
0.823
0.857
0.847
0.755
0.82
0.818
0.780
DBJ13-51-2003
(2003)
N uc
Nuc
N ue
(kN)
EC4 (1994)
Nuc
(kN)
N uc
N ue
1178
1178
1147
1147
821
821
801
801
632
632
618
618
1303
1303
1262
1262
993
993
962
962
780
780
762
762
1.034
1.024
1.008
1.014
1.179
1.135
1.166
1.152
1.137
1.234
1.219
1.163
0.935
0.925
0.916
0.921
0.975
0.938
0.971
0.959
0.921
1.00
0.989
0.944
Mean value
0.936
1.000
0.855
0.897
0.95
1.122
COV
(Coefficient of variation)
0.168
0.039
0.06
0.025
0.029
0.081
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
(a) e/ro = 0.
1321
(a) CB1-1.
(b) SB1-1.
Fig. 13. Distribution of the strain across the section of the mid-height of test specimens.
only two figures for the comparisons between the predicted and
measured axial load versus extreme fibre strains are given in
this paper, as shown in Fig. 16.
In the calculations, the idealized elastoplastic stressstrain
model, based on the test results for both the flat zone and the
corner zone of cold-formed steel section, proposed by AbdelRahman and Sivakumaran [1], has been used for the square
steel tube, as shown in Fig. 17, where f sy is the yielding
1322
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
(a) e/ro = 0.
(2)
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
(a) e/ro = 0.
1323
Fig. 16. Comparison of relationships of axial load versus extreme fibre strains at mid-height between calculated results and tested ones.
1324
Y.-F. Yang, L.-H. Han / Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 13101324
Acknowledgements
The tests reported herein were made possible by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50425823), the
Start-Up Fund for Outstanding Incoming Researchers Project
of Tsinghua University, the Education Bureau fund of Fujian
Province (JB05060), and the Science and Technology Fund
of Fuzhou University (2004-XQ-19). The financial support is
highly appreciated. The authors also wish to thank Mr. Bo
Zhang, Mr. Xin Ye and Miss Feng-Ying Wu for their assistance
in the experiments.
References
[1] Abdel-Rahman N, Sivakumaran KS. Material properties models for
analysis of cold-formed steel members. Journal of Structural Engineering,
ASCE 1997;123(9):113543.
[2] ACI 318-99. Building code requirements for structural concrete and
commentary. Detroit, Farmington Hills (MI, USA): American Concrete
Institute; 1999.
[3] AIJ. Recommendations for design and construction of concrete filled steel
tubular structures. Tokyo (Japan): Architectural Institute of Japan; 1997.
[4] AISC-LRFD. Load and resistance factor design specification for structural
steel buildings. 2nd ed. Chicago (USA): American Institute of Steel
Construction (AISC); 1999.
[5] Ajdukiewicz A, Kliszczewicz A. Influences of recycled aggregates on
mechanical properties of HS/HPC. Cement & Concrete Composites 2002;
24(2):26979.
[6] ASCCS. Concrete filled steel tubesa comparison of international codes
and practices. In: ASCCS Seminar. 1997.
[7] British Standard Institute. BS5400, Part 5. Concrete and composite
bridges. London (UK); 1979.
[8] DBJ 13-51-2003. Technical specification for concrete-filled steel tubular
structures. Fuzhou; 2003 [in Chinese].
[9] Eurocode 4. Design of composite steel and concrete structures, Part1.1:
General rules and rules for buildings (together with United Kingdom
National Application Document). DD ENV 1994-1-1:1994. British
Standards Institution, London W1A2BS, 1994.
[10] Han LH, Yao GH. Influence of concrete compaction on the strength
of concrete-filled steel RHS columns. Journal of Constructional Steel
Research 2003;59(6):75167.
[11] Han LH, Yao GH. Behaviour of concrete-filled hollow structural steel
(HSS) columns with preload on the steel tubes. Journal of Constructional
Steel Research 2003;59(12):145575.
[12] Han LH, Yang YF, Tao Z. Concrete-filled thin walled steel RHS beamcolumns subjected to cyclic loading. Thin-Walled Structures 2003;41(9):
80133.
[13] Han LH, Yao GH, Zhao XL. Behavior and calculation on concrete-filled
steel CHS (circular hollow section) beam-columns. Steel and Composite
Structures 2004;4(3):16988.
[14] Han LH, Zhao XL, Tao Z. Tests and mechanics model for concrete-filled
SHS stub columns, columns and beam-columns. Steel and Composite
Structures 2001;1(1):5174.
[15] Katz A. Properties of concrete made with recycled aggregate from
partially hydrated old concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 2003;
33(5):70311.
[16] Konno K, Sato Y, Kakuta Y, Ohira M. Property of recycled concrete
column encased by steel tube subjected to axial compression. Transactions
of the Japan Concrete Institute 1997;19(2):2318.
[17] Konno K, Sato Y, Ueda T, Onaga M. Mechanical property of recycled
concrete under lateral confinement. Transactions of the Japan Concrete
Institute 1998;20(3):28792.
[18] Sagoe-Crentsil KK, Brown T, Taylor AH. Performance of concrete made
with commercially produced coarse recycled concrete aggregate. Cement
and Concrete Research 2001;31(5):70712.
[19] Schneider SP. Axially loaded concrete-filled steel tubes. Journal of
Structural Engineering, ASCE 1998;124(10):112538.
[20] Topcu IB, Sengel S. Properties of concretes produced with waste concrete
aggregate. Cement and Concrete Research 2004;34(8):130712.