"In any legal system, whether a given norm is legally valid,and hence whether it forms part of the law of that system,
dependsonitssources,notitsmerits."
Inthepositivistview,the"source"ofalawistheestablishmentofthatlawbysomesociallyrecognizedlegalauthority.
The"merits"ofalawareaseparateissue:itmaybea"badlaw"bysomestandard,butifitwasaddedtothesystembya
legitimateauthority,itisstillalaw.
JohnAustindistinguishingfeatureofalegalsystemistheexistenceofasovereignwhoseauthorityisrecognizedbymost
membersofasociety,theauthorityofwhichisenforcedbytheuseofsanctions,butwhichisnotboundbyanyhuman
superior.Thecriterionforvalidityofalegalruleinsucha societyisthatithasthewarrantofthesovereignandwillbe
enforcedbythesovereignpoweranditsagents.
ThethreebasictenetsofAustin'spositivismare:
lawsarecommandsissuedbytheuncommandedcommander,i.e.thesovereign;
suchcommandsareenforcedbysanctions;and
asovereignisonewhoisobeyedbythemajority.
Austin considered the law as commands from a sovereign that are enforced by threat of sanction. In determining 'a
sovereign',Austinrecognizeditisonewhomsocietyobeyshabitually.Thissovereigncanbeasinglepersonoracollective
sovereign such as Parliament, with a number of individuals, with each having various authoritative powers. Austin's
theoryisalsosomewhatbriefin hisexplanationsofConstitutions,InternationalLaw,nonsanctionedrules,orlawthat
givesrights.Insofarasnonsanctionedrulesandlawsthat allowpersonstodothings,suchas contractlaw,Austinsaid
thatfailuretoobeytherulesdoesresultinsanctions;however,suchsanctionsareintheformof"thesanctionofnullity."
AustinwasgreatlyinfluencedinhisphilosophybyJeremyBentham.