Engr. Omah A. D.
Supervisor
date
Dr. Neife S. I.
(Head of department)
date
DECLARATION
I, Nweke Kenechukwu Chiemelie, hereby declare that this work titled
dielectric, physical and mechanical properties of agro-waste material
(cassava cortex) was carried out under the supervision of Engr. Omah A. D. a
lecture in the department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering of
University of Nigeria Nsukka.
Nweke Kenechukwu Chiemelie
(2010/170291)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I bless the name of the lord god almighty, the creator of the universe
of which without his infinite mercy, love, protection, guidance and blessing, I
could not have gotten to this level.
My sincere gratitude goes to my indefatigable supervisor, Engr. Omah
A. D. who, in spite of his tight schedules always create time to attend to and
assist me right from the commencement of this project to the very
concluding part. May the lord reward you in Jesus name, Amen. My thanks
also goes to my HOD Dr. Neife S. I. for his wonderful co-ordination of the
department. Thanks to my lectures, departmental staffs and most especially,
my project colleague, Ugwu Ifeanyichukwu, who also deeply contributed to
this project. May the lord God bless you all and replenish the strength and
effort expended during this project work.
My deep appreciation goes Dr. and Mrs. Nwaigwe, my mother and
siblings for their support throughout my stay here on campus.
Lastly, my appreciation goes to my friends Ezeonu Lotanna, Nduka
Chigozie, Ikengwu Chisom, Ugwu Nnaemeka and all others who have
contributed positively to my life, I may not have mentioned your name but
from the bottom of my heart, am very grateful and may God bless you all.
Thank you.
DEDICATION
This project work is dedicated to almighty God whom I thank for
making it a possibility. In addition, I dedicate this work to the loving memory
of my late father, Mr. Nweke Peter Okwudili, who aided me in taking my first
step into this noble institution but is not here to celebrate my levitation. May
his loving and gentle soul rest in peace in Jesus name, Amen.
ABSTRACT
In power systems, there is an ever-increasing demand placed on
insulators especially for outdoor applications. Additionally, the huge cost of
importation has resulted in a growing need for the local manufacture. To this
end, an electrical insulator was manufactured from locally available raw
materials and characterized. The study investigates a composite type
percentage composition of cassava cortex particulate, epoxy resin, and
hardener. The sample was manufactured by the dry process technique. The
carbonized, pulverized and thoroughly sieved composition was mixed and
allowed to cure at room temperature for around 24 hours. The results of the
characterization show that the sample has an average breakdown voltage of
34kV/mm, zero water absorption and average dielectric constant 6.09 within
the frequency range considered, average experimental density of 1.32g/cm 3
and average impact energy of 4.1J These results when compared with those
of the commercial variety show that the locally manufactured sample
satisfies the stringent requirements of a good insulating material.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page
Certification page
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Declaration
Abstract
Table of contents
List of tables
List of figures
Chapter one: Introduction
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
Chapter one
Introduction
The term dielectric was introduced by M. Faraday to describe
materials through which electric fields can penetrate. In any substance
placed in an electric field, its component electric charges (electrons,
atomic nuclei) are subjected to the forces of the field. As a result, some
of the charges move directionally, creating an electric current. The rest
of the charges are redistributed in such a way that the centers of mass
of the positive and negative charges shift in relation to one another.
This
process
is
known
as
polarization
of
the
substance.
The
the filled levels by the forbidden band. This forbidden band usually
cannot be overcome by electrons under the influence of the not very
strong conventional fields. Thus, in dielectrics, the effects of the
electric field are limited to a redistribution of electron density, which
results in polarization of the dielectric.
The
distribution
of
electrons
by
energy
levels
is
similar
for
a process for a given application, and careful study is necessary before a choice can be
made.
The process descriptions have shown that many methods for the low-temperature
carbonization of coal are available for use, and from them chars with a wide variety of
characteristics can be obtained. One desirable characteristic of char is its smokeless
quality.
This property, together with suitable form characteristics, has won for the lump char
produced by certain processes important places in the domestic fuel market in Great
Britain and in other European countries. The second product, also of major importance,
has been the large volume of tar. During 1920s there was a common expectation that the
values of these products, especially the chemicals to be derived from the tar, plus possible
economies in the carbonization processes as compared to high-temperature coke ovens,
would lead to attractive profits from a low temperature plant. Engineers and inventors
have proposed a great amount of work and innumerable designs. Of all the processes
worked on during that period, only one-the present Disco process - survived.
There are five necessary conditions to be met if a low-temperature carbonization process
is to be rendered technically and economically feasible:
1) Universal applicability to different types of high-volatile coals
2) Production of a firm, abrasion resistant product
3) Maintenance of desirable temperature conditions through the system to produce a
uniform tar
4) Maintenance of an output which is economically attractive, a condition dependent on
rabidity of heat transfer and involving oven design and the thickness of the coal bed
5) Smooth, trouble-free oven operation
The two processes in regular commercial use are the Disco process of the Consolidation
Coal company, this plant being located near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and the stoker
carbonization process, operated by Shawinigan Chemicals Ltd. in Canada. In addition to
these plants, the Parry process has been operated experimentally on lignite by the Texas
Power and Light Company at the power installation for the Aluminum Company of
America at Rockdale, Texas. The Lurgi-Spulgas process also has operated in North
Dakota for some time on the local lignite. A process for producing a metallurgical formed
coke from Wyoming subbituminous coal was announced, and production of a lowtemperature char is one of the first steps. This plant is operated by Food Machinery and
Chemical Company and the United States Steel Corporation at Kemmerer, Wyoming. In
Europe, Japan, and other parts of the world, the Kruoo-Lurgi, Lurgi-spulgas and
Rochdale gas re-circulation appear to be most widely in use, but work is proceeding at a
number of locations on smaller-scale units of other carbonization methods.
Although many processes have been realised, they have been operated on different coals,
in different ways, and for widely different objectives. Little correlation between them is
available. Each process has often functioned on pretty much an experimental scale,
without reaching the more critical stage of successful commercial practice. The engineer
entering the low-temperature field finds it almost a virgin one, which encompasses first
the selection of a process for a given need, then the design and engineering with the
identification and definition of the problems to be faced, and finally plant operation and
meeting the unexpected developments. For these reasons commercial evaluations of
processes are still very difficult Low temperature chars differ markedly from hightemperature cokes in appearance and properties. Generally, pieces of low temperature
chars are black to dull grey, with an open, porous structure. They are softer, more friable,
and weigh less than high-temperature coke.
Both the apparent and true densities are lower. The volatile content of the char usually
lies in the range from about 20% down to 9 or 10%. When heated, a char gives off much
hydrogen, and the gas burns with an almost non-luminous flame. Because of the high
volatile content and the open structure, char ignites readily and burns freely. These
qualities make a lump char an ideal fuel for the open domestic grade. The quality of a
charcoal can be represented by a great many other properties including charcoal yield,
fixed-carbon content, moisture content, calorific value, elemental composition, hardness
(abrasion resistance), compressive strength, bulk and true densities, surface area, porosity
and pore volume distribution, electrical resistivity, and reactivity. The high reactivity of
chars necessitates their thorough quenching or cooling unless they are to be used very
shortly. In general, the properties of chars are greatly affected by the coals from which
they have been produced and by the conditions to which they have been exposed during
its
mechanical,
thermal
and
chemical
properties.
The
characteristics.
All
dielectric
products
are
electrical
1.1
1.3
In order to reduce agro waste material and at the same time making
good use of it, for the improvement of dielectrics for the utilization of
the electrical industry, cassava cortex which is an example of agro
waste product is used for the fabrication of dielectric materials. The
insulating and mechanical properties determined include:
1.4
Breakdown voltage
Dielectric constant
Linear shrinkage
Water absorption capacity
Moisture content of the composite
Density
Tensile and strength
Impact strength
problem statement
friendly
materials
for
engineering
design
and
fabrication. Taking agro waste as a case study, when this waste are not
properly disposed, they can be harmful to the environment. This can
be prevented and at the same time turn to an advantage if these agro
waste product can be processed into useful product for human used.
For this reason, scientists and engineers have been working on ways to
transform and improve these waste for the betterment of humans.
Most of engineering designs that are metallic are being replaced
with composite materials because of its promising properties and the
flexibility in its properties. That is why most of the agro waste product
are being transformed to composite.
Many materials researchers have used natural fibers/particulate
such as animal bone, egg shell, periwinkle shell, saw dust, coconut
shell, palm kernel shell, cassava cortex etc. to reinforce polymer to
improve either their mechanical, physical, chemical or insulating
properties which ordinarily pure polymer cannot give.
1.5
environmental
friendly.
Using
this
waste
material
in
Chapter two
2.1 Literature review
The first polymers used for electrical insulators were bisphenol and
cycloaliphatic epoxy resins [Frelikh, G., Teoriia dielektrikov]. Introduced
commercially in the mid-1940s, bisphenol epoxy resins were the first
polymers used for electrical insulators, and are still used to make electrical
insulators for indoor and outdoor applications. Cycloaliphatic epoxy (CE)
were introduced in 1957. They are superior to bisphenol because of their
greater resistance to carbon formation. However, the first commercial CE
insulators failed shortly after installation in outdoor environments. Since
then, new CE formations have resulted in improved electrical performance.
In the early 1960s, distribution class (CE) insulators were first sold
commercially in the U.S. under the name GEPOL. These units failed due to
surface damage and puncture. CE was used later in experimental 500 kV
station breaker bushings, and in 115 kV bushings in the 1970s, and for
suspension insulators by Transmission Development Limited (TDL) of
England. The TDL suspension insulators used slant sheds to provide natural
washing of contamination. From the mid-1960s on, CE insulators were tested
at up to 400 kV service voltage as suspension / strain insulators and crossarm in the United Kingdom. For various reasons, including poor cold
temperature performance and insufficient weight reduction, CE did not gain
acceptance in the US for outdoor high voltage suspension insulators. But
today, CE is widely used in indoor and even semi-enclosed power systems.
In the 1960s an insulator having porcelain sheds supported by an
epoxy resin fiberglass rod was developed. It was not widely used because of
data
gathering.
As
consequence
of
reported
failures
some
to
overcoming
all
the
problems
highlighted
above,
create
and
promoting
under-utilized
resources,
technological
and
viable
and
also
meet
required
standards
cannot
be
overemphasized.
Porcelain is a ceramic material made by heating raw materials,
generally including clay in the form of kaolin, in a kiln to temperatures
between 1,200 C (2,192 F) and 1,400 C (2,552 F). The toughness,
strength, and translucence of porcelain arise mainly from the formation of
glass and the mineral mullite within the fired body at these high
temperatures (Porcelain, 2009). Porcelain had been found to be a veritable
stoneware due to its very high density, industrial fast firing cycles, tangible
mechanical strength and wear resistance (Tucci et al., 2007). Unquestionably
porcelain insulators have a wide range of application in the safe transmission
of electricity. Porcelain is primarily composed of clay, feldspar and filler
material, usually quartz or alumina. The clay [(Al2Si2O5 (OH) 4] gives
plasticity to the ceramic mixture, flint or quartz [SiO2] maintains the shape
of the formed article during firing and feldspar [KxNai-x (AlSi3) O8] serves as
flux (CRMPI, 2006). These three constituents place electrical porcelain in the
phase system in term of oxide constituents, hence the term triaxial porcelain
(Buchanan, 1991).
Most existing literatures on body compositions and processing
conditions for porcelains of all kinds such as Norton (1980) and Olupot (2006)
applies mainly to foreign raw materials, which can be quite different from the
local ones in terms of chemical, mineralogical and physical characteristics.
Therefore more efforts should be channeled to establish data and procedures
on the development of electrical porcelain with local raw materials.
One desirable characteristic of char is its smokeless quality. This property, together with suitable
form characteristics, has won for the lump char produced by certain processes important places
in the domestic fuel market in Great Britain and in other European countries. Attention,
moreover, is being given in Great Britain to conserving domestic coals of carbonisable quality
for use in coking. In many localities where smoke-control regulations are in effect, smokeless
fuels are being demanded, and consumers may find they do not have appliances including
devices for gas ignition. For these consumers, reactive low-temperature chars, possibly in the
form of briquettes prepared from non-coking coals-which are under development, should be
useful. It is expected that they will receive a premium price. The situation of the tar is similar.
Because the tar will compete with fuels oils, is should at least be comparable in characteristics
with them and possess no property which will render it less desirable. The presence of excessive
quantities of solid char in some tars has materially reduced their value. In Germany and Japan
during World War II little petroleum was available, and the military demand fro aviation fuels
was acute and partially satisfied by motor fuels derived from the low-temperature tars produced
in those countries. With the now adequate availability of petroleum products, the demand for the
tar fractions for these uses has disappeared. Where petroleum in normally available, lowtemperature tars have had difficulty in competing successfully.
The volume of the gas is small, and its heating value is often low because of dilution with
combustion products. On a therm basis, the yield is about half that produced in high temperature
processes, and most of the gas is frequently consumed internally in the plant where it is made.
The volume left has been insufficient to make the process of interest as a producer for city
distribution. The process descriptions have shown that many methods for the low-temperature
carbonization of coal are available for use, and from them chars with a wide variety of
characteristics can be obtained. The second product, also of major importance, has been the large
volume of tar. It was long a common expectation that the values of these products, especially the
chemicals to be derived from the tar, plus possible economies in the carbonization processes as
compared to high-temperature coke ovens, would lead to attractive profits from a low
temperature plant. These opinions have been largely responsible for the great amount of work
and for the development of the innumerable designs, which have been proposed by engineers and
inventors. Not only was much money spent in the legitimate development of new processes, but
low-temperature carbonization also became a fertile field for cranks and promoters, especially
during the 1920s. In 1931, Soule [1] estimated that over $50.000.000 had been spent in the
United States alone on low temperature processes during the previous 10 years. Of all the
processes worked on during that period, only one-the present Disco process - survived. As a
result of the widespread disillusion and the shattering losses, work on low-temperature
carbonization almost dried up in the United States early in the 1930s. The experience in Great
Britain and on the Continent has been similar. However, due to the different pattern of fuel
availability in these countries, especially the absence of the ample supplies of oil and gas that
have been developed in the United States, work on low temperature carbonization continued at a
higher level of activity.
In spite of the years that have elapsed since the early interest in low-temperature
carbonization, review of the experience of the 1920s can be of value to modern investigators.
The disappointments and disillusionments resulting from low-temperature carbonization were
well summarized by Soule. He had just finished a long period of service with one of the largest
commercial installations of a low-temperature process, which had been made in the United States
and which had just ended in failure. Low-temperature projects of the period were divided into
three classes, according to their primary objectives: first, the development of low-temperature
char as an improved domestic fuel; second, the use of low-temperature carbonization as a step in
the complete gasification of coal to manufacture a cheap industrial gaseous fuel; and third the
replacement of bituminous coal as a boiler fuel by low-temperature char. Justification for
manufacture of low-temperature char as a domestic fuel had been based on the false premise that
it could be made to sell at a cheaper price than bituminous coal. Actually, low-temperature chars
at that time were unable to sell for less as a domestic fuel than did high-temperature coke.
Disregarding the differences in operating techniques, there were two primary reasons for this
condition: the lower by-product credits for the low temperature process, and the difficulties
attendant on the transfer of heat into the coal charge. The lower by-product credits for lowtemperature carbonization were due to the smaller yield of by-product gas. This smaller yield
was of vital importance, and was rarely offset by the increased yield of tar. Hence, with a lower
by-product return from the low-temperature process, it was still more essential to operate at a
lower cost in order to for the low temperature tar to complete with high-temperature ovens.
These assumed that operating economies proved illusory. Transfer of heat into coal is a very slow
operation, and at low temperatures, without agitation of the charge, the rate of transfer is reduced
well below that a high temperatures.
Two alternatives were available, according to Soule, both of which seriously affected investment
and operating costs, either coking the coal in thin layers or mechanical agitation of the charge. A
thin layer construction, however, basically similar to high-temperature practice, multiplies flues
and retorts and penalized the process with an excessive investment burden. To offset this,
agitation of the charge was employed. Although this practice was often successful in reducing the
number and cost of retorts, as a result of the agitation a weak, crumbly, light coke, much inferior
in size and strength to that from the fixed retorts, was produced. This situation left the lowtemperature operator with two alternative products, a lump coke with a high investment in
stationary retorts, or an inferior coke from agitated retorts of high throughput and lower
investment and operating costs. Up to 1931, no commercial enterprise had been able to operate
profitably on either basis. Soule considered the two other applications for low-temperature
carbonization- a step in complete gasification of coal and the production of solid fuel for boiler
use- more rational in conception. Complete gasification involved production of a low heating
value gas for industrial use. His experience led to the conclusion that this should be a two-step
operation, with lump char made in stationary retorts and then transferred directly, while the hot if
possible, to a blue-water-gas generator in which the gasification step took place. Size and
properties of the char would be of lesser importance. The low-temperature tar would be a
byproduct of the process, but since 1931, its value only slightly exceeded that of petroleum fuel
oil, the credits from its production were not enough to offset the higher costs of the lump char.
In discussing the manufacture of a boiler fuel, Soule leaned toward an operation in which
finely divided coal was passed continuously through a retort, heated either externally or
internally. Apparently he had in mind an approach to the present day fluidized process. Two of
the difficult operating problems he visualized were the separation of the finely divided dusts
entrained with the outlet gases and the cooling of the finely divided coke. However, the char
could not compete as a boiler fuel unless it could be produced for less money than the cost of the
competing coal or other fuel. Finally, great difficulty was incurred in developing applications for
the fractions or components of the low-temperature tar, and this problem still appears to be
unsolved.
With the advent of fluidized or entrained processes operating on finely divided coals, in units
capable of handling large tonnages, some of the difficulties inherent in the earlier retorts that
plagued Soule and his colleagues have apparently been reduced or even eliminated. The char
from the new processes is, of course, produced in a finely divided form, suitable for industrial
firing. To obtain a product in lumps, the fine char must be briquetted, and since the binder will
give off smoke on heating, a second carbonization step must be applied to the briquettes. This
means that instead of a single operation-the fluidization step- three will be required, fluidization,
briquetting, and final carbonization.
The alternative to producing a lump char by briquetting is to carbonize a coking coal in
such a way that it forms lumps. Soule also indicated that some of the difficulties which could be
encountered. In a high-temperature oven, the coke shrinks and pulls away from the walls of the
oven as carbonization is completed. In a low-temperature slot retort, carbonization may be
complete when the char has actually expanded, so that discharge of the coke by pushing may be
entirely impractical. To permit discharge from these low-temperature ovens, in a number of cases
the walls have been considerably tapered. With other retorts, the walls have been made movable
so that they can be swung aside to permit the char to drop out onto a car or conveyor. These
measures can add materially to the cost of an installation. In carbonizing a coking coal in a
continuous retort, heating eventually puts it in a plastic condition where it balls up into masses
that harden on the walls or screws of the retort. These accumulations may result in irregular
operation or even cause production to cease.
Accumulation of irregular masses on the surface causes uneven temperature conditions in the
retort walls with subsequent warping and distortion. Many attempts have been made to cope with
such accumulations [2]. Building heavier retorts has usually proved impractical, and periodic
disassembly for cleaning has often proved to be the ultimate answer, with a resulting serious loss
in production. Pre-treatment of the coal can be employed, but it adds to the cost of the operation.
On the basis of his experience with low-temperature processes, Price listed the requirements he
considered necessary for successfully producing a char to be used in place of low-volatile coal in
the mix for blast furnace coke [3,4]. These requirements are deserving of consideration in
connection with any new installation for producing a char:
1) The prime requisite is that the char produced in the retort will make a satisfactory grade of
coke, the satisfactory use of the coke in the blast furnaces being the criterion of its quality
2) Agitation of the coal within the retort appears to be desirable to prevent the coal from caking
and to insure efficient and uniform heating of all coal particles
3) The retort should have as few interior projections as possible consistent with proper working
to prevent build-up of carbonaceous material
4) The process of feeding coal and discharging char should be continuous
5) Access to the interior of the retort for inspection and cleaning should be easy
6) Control of heating should be adequate for handling of different grades of coal and for
producing the desired quality of char there from, and the retort should be efficient in its
consumption of fuel
7) It should not require that the coal be closely sized nor than all fines be removed from the coal
for its satisfactory operation
8) It should have a relatively high rate of daily throughout in order to reduce the number of
separate units required to simplify operation practice
9) It must be capable of being operated at sufficiently high-temperatures to insure the production
of char of the proper chemical and physical properties
10) It should be of sufficiently rigid construction to withstand deformation in event of emergency
shutdown
11) It should be of simple and rugged design making possible low repair, maintenance and
operating cost
12) Installation cost should be as low as possible consistent with good quality of construction
and with the other requirements as stated
13) It should be provided with adequate dust collectors in order that the tars and liquid products
be not unduly contaminated by char dust Hansen [5] has named five necessary conditions to be
met if a low-temperature carbonization process is to be rendered technically and economically
feasible:
6) Universal applicability to different types of high-volatile coals
7) Production of a firm, abrasion resistant product
8) Maintenance of desirable temperature conditions through the system to produce a uniform tar
9) Maintenance of an output which is economically attractive, a condition dependent on rabidity
of heat transfer and involving oven design and the thickness of the coal bed
10) Smooth, trouble-free oven operation
Low-temperature processes in the United States and Canada have operated largely on an
experimental basis, with two exceptions. The two processes in regular commercial use are the
Disco process of the Consolidation Coal Company, this plant being located near Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, and the stoker carbonization process, operated by Shawinigan Chemicals Ltd. in
Canada.
In addition to these plants, the Parry process has been operated experimentally on lignite
by the Texas Power and Light Company at the power installation for the Aluminum Company of
America at Rockdale, Texas. The Lurgi-Spulgas process also has operated in North Dakota for
some time on the local lignite. A process fro producing a metallurgical formed coke from
Wyoming subbituminous coal was announced, and production of a low-temperature char is one
of the first steps. This plant is operated by Food Machinery and Chemical Company and the
United States Steel Corporation at Kemmerer, Wyoming.
In Europe, Japan, and other parts of the world, the Kruoo-Lurgi, Lurgi-spulgas and Rochdale gas
re-circulation appear to be most widely in use, but work is proceeding at a number of locations
on smaller-scale units of other carbonization methods.
These few plants provide a limited engineering basis for the selection or installation of a low
temperature process to meet a given need. Although many processes have been tried, they have
been operated on different coals, in different ways, and for widely different objectives.
Little correlation between them is available. Each process has often functioned on pretty much
an experimental scale, without reaching the more critical stage of successful commercial
practice. Numerous factors, such as handling the dust in the outlet gases and cooling the char,
although possibly of lesser importance in pilot installation, can become serious problems when a
process becomes mature and a full-scale plant is required. The engineer entering the lowtemperature field finds it almost a virgin one, which encompasses first the selection of a process
for a given need, then the design and engineering with the identification and definition of the
problems to be faced, and finally plant operation and meeting the unexpected developments. For
these reasons commercial evaluations of processes are still very difficult.
Little significant information on the costs of low-temperature processes is available, but
reliable estimates are important in considering an installation. Parry [6] has given a useful
relation between the costs of the coals employed, the cost of processing, and the value of the tar.
For the use of the char as a power-plant fuel he expressed this relation by an equation, which can
be transported into several forms:
P VT C(1 R)
where P=net cost of processing and handling fuel to the burner, which equals the total processing
cost, including crushing, drying, carbonization, tar condensing, and handling of materials, minus
the total estimated cost of burning raw coal, including crushing, pulverizing, and handling; C=
cost of coal delivered to the processing plant; R= net heat ratio, char/coal, obtained from assay
and analysis; T= tar yield, gallons per ton, obtained from assay; and V=break even value of the
tar, cents per gallon.
A.D. Little [7] has estimated the gross receipts, which might be derived per ton of North Dakota
lignite from the char and the products potentially available from the tar. The use of lignite as a
fuel has been on a comparatively small scale because of its high water content almost 50%- and
its tendency to heat spontaneously in a pile, which makes storage difficult. From the $3.03 gross
receipts shown by A.D. Little should be subtracted the various costs chargeable against the
operation: the cost of the lignite itself, any transportation, costs of processing and of refining the
tar, the costs of transportation of the various products to the market, fixed charges on the
investment, and taxes.
In this work, cassava peel also known as cassava cortex is the raw material that was used
as the particulate in the composite fabrication.
Cassava peels can represent 5 to 15% of the root (Aro et al., 2010; Nwokoro et al.,
2005a). They are obtained after the tubers have been water-cleansed and peeled mechanically
(Aro et al., 2010). They may contain high amounts of cyanogenic glycosides and have a higher
protein content than other tuber parts (Tewe, 2004).
Fresh cassava peels have 3 main deficiencies: they spoil very quickly, they contain phytates and
large amounts of cyanogenic glycosides. They should thus be processed in order to reduce
cyanogenic potential and phytate content and to preserve their nutritive quality (Oboh, 2006;
Salami et al., 2003; Tewe, 1992; Adegbola et al., 1985). Different processes are effective in
reducing cyanogenic glycoside including sun-drying, ensiling, and soaking + sun-drying. All
these methods have yielded satisfactory results (Salami et al., 2003; Tewe, 1992; Adegbola et al.,
1985).
Good quality silage can be obtained after chopping the peels to equal lengths of about 2 cm for
easy compaction, and wilting for 2 days to reduce moisture content from 70-75 % to about 40%.
Under these conditions, cassava peel silage after 21 days was light brown in colour, firm in
texture and had a pleasant odor. The pH was 4.4, and no fungal growth was observed (Asaolu,
1988 cited by Smith, 1988).
In Nigeria, drying cassava peels on black plastic sheets has been drawing the attention of
smallholders and was the Winning project of the 2008 Global Development Marketplace (a grant
programm held by the World Bank), "Using cassava waste to raise goats".
Solid fermentation of a mixture of cassava peels and waste water from fermented cassava
pulp with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus spp. resulted in a product with a higher
protein content, lower cyanogenic glycosides and lower phytate content (Ubalua, 2007; Oboh,
2006).
Cassava processing produces large amounts of waste and is generally considered to
contribute significantly to environmental pollution (FAO, 2001). A cassava starch production unit
processing 100 tons of tubers per day has an output 47 tons of fresh by-products, which may
cause environmental problems when left in the surroundings of processing plants or carelessly
disposed of (Aro et al., 2010). In Nigeria, for example, cassava wastes are usually left to rot
away or burnt to create space for the accumulation of yet more waste heaps. The heaps emit
carbon dioxide and produce a strong offensive smell (Aro et al., 2010; Adebayo, 2008). Cassava
peels (large amounts of cyanogenic glucosides) and pomace (large amounts of biodegradable
organic matter) may cause surface water pollution especially if they are stored under heavy rain
or simply disposed of in surface waters (Pandey et al., 2000; Cereda et al., 1996; Barana et al.,
2000). The presence of a large processor or several small processors can cause the eutrophication
of slow moving water systems, notably during the dry season (FAO, 2001). However, cassava
processing does not seem to affect groundwater supply, except occasionally in the immediate
surroundings of processing units, due to leaching through the soil (FAO, 2001). Starch extraction
requires large volumes of water and may cause water depletion, but in most areas this problem is
minimized by the adoption of processing technologies suitable for the water resources available
(FAO, 2001).
Chapter three
Materials and methodology
3.1 Materials
A low cost manufacturing process using simple experimental
design methodology has been developed for this study, and no
expensive machinery was required for processing. Locally evaluable
raw materials were used in this work.
The agro-waste material (cassava cortex) was obtained from
local markets in Nsukka in Enugu state. Simple molding process was
used in the sample fabrication. After the fabrication of the samples,
they were subjected to series of tests such as dielectric test and
mechanical tests. The description of the process is shown below.
Cassava cortex
Epoxy resin
Hardener
Mold making
Preparation of the composition for the samples
Casting
ensured that the base of the mold was firmly held to avoid leakage
during pouring.
3.3.2 Preparation of the composite for the samples
S/N
1
Designation
Composition
150 microns cassava 40% epoxy + 20% hardener + 40%
cortex particulate
particulate
33% epoxy + 17% hardener + 50%
particulate
27% epoxy + 13% hardener + 60%
particulate
300 microns cassava 40% epoxy + 20% hardener + 40%
cortex particulate
particulate
33% epoxy + 17% hardener + 50%
particulate
27% epoxy + 13% hardener + 60%
particulate
particulate
33% epoxy + 17% hardener + 50%
particulate
27% epoxy + 13% hardener + 60%
particulate
From the table above, samples were produced for each particulate size.
3.3.3 Casting of the samples
The casting process is the last stage of fabrication of the sample.
After the equivalent volume is known for each sample, releasing agent
was properly applied in the mold for easy removal of the sample after
curing. The resin (epoxy) is then mixed with the hardener in the ratio of
2:1 in a glass beaker and stirred properly. The particulate was then
Vo
V
Where
( M 2M 1 )
100
M1
( M 3M 4 )
100
M3
Drying shrinkage =
LwLd
100
Ld
Fired shrinkage =
LwLf
100
Ld
(2)
Total shrinkage =
LwLf
100
Lw
(3)
(1)
3.4.8 Density
Density was calculated using a direct volume measurement method. This method
involves the use of water displacement method and the mass of the samples. The mass of
the sample divided by the volume of the displaced water will give the density of the
samples
Density =
M
v =mass/volume (g/cm3)
Chapter 4
Data, analysis and interpretation
This chapter is centered on the explanation of all the results of the
tests that has been carried out on the fabricated sample. Some of these tests
are destructive (damaging the specimen after the test) while some of them
are non-destructive (the specimen still intact after the test was conducted)
Below are the data generated for the various tests and the possible
explanations to the nature of the prevailing values
4.1 breakdown voltage.
Below is the breakdown voltage value of the composite with different volume
fraction of particles and epoxy
S/N
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sample
40% 150U
50% 150U
60% 150U
40% 300U
50% 300U
60% 300U
7
8
9
10
40% 600U
50% 600U
60% 600U
CONTROL
38
40
40
Sample
Vo
across
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
40% 150U
50% 150U
60% 150U
40% 300U
50% 300U
60% 300U
40% 600U
50% 600U
60% 600U
control
voltage V
with
voltage
air gap
1.00059
1.00059
1.00059
1.00059
1.00059
1.00059
1.00059
1.00059
1.00059
1.00059
sample
1.02V
0.06V
0.10V
0.65V
1.15V
0.20V
0.10V
0.21V
0.20V
Vo
V
0.9810
16.6765
10.0059
1.5394
0.8701
5.0030
10.0059
4.7647
5.0030
Samples
Initial
weight Final
weight Water
absorption
before
immersion
after
in from
= M1)/M1 X 100
40%
water = M1(g)
35
M2(g)
36
(percentage)
2.86
150U
50%
33
34
3.03
150U
60%
35
36
2.86
150U
40%
35
37
5.71
300U
50%
33
35
6.06
300U
60%
35
38
8.57
300U
40%
32
35
9.38
600U
50%
30
33
10.00
600U
60%
27
31
14.81
10
600U
control
36
37
2.78
From the table above, it can be observed that the composite has a zero
moisture absorption content. That is, the weight of the material before the
absorption is the weight of the material after the absorption.
Samples
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
40% 150U
50% 150U
60% 150U
40% 300U
50% 300U
60% 300U
40% 600U
50% 600U
60% 600U
control
M3(g)
36
34
36
37
35
38
35
33
30
37
= the
oven
M4(g)
35
33
35
35
33
35
32
30
27
38
MC=(M3-
= M4)/M3 X 100
2.86
2.94
2.86
2.70
5.71
7.89
8.57
9.09
10.00
2.70
Samples
40% 150U
50% 150U
60% 150U
40% 300U
50% 300U
60% 300U
40% 600U
50% 600U
60% 600U
CONTROL
Energy(J)
5.10
5.00
5.00
3.45
3.50
3.40
3.35
3.75
2.95
5.50
The total linear shrinkage percentage of insulators were found to increase with increasing
cassava cortex content and reduction of epoxy as indicated by Tables
S/N
Sample
Dry
Wet
Fired
Dry
Fired
Total
length
length
length
shrinka
shrinka
shrinka
ge
4.17
ge
4.17
40%
12
12
11.5
ge
0
150U
50%
12
12
11.1
7.50
7.50
150U
60%
12
12
10.9
9.16
9.17
150U
40%
12
12
10.4
13.33
13.33
300U
50%
12
12
10.5
12.50
12.50
300U
60%
12
12
10.0
16.67
16.67
300U
40%
12
12
9.80
18.33
18.33
600U
50%
12
12
9.80
18.33
18.33
600U
60%
12
12
9.70
19.67
19.17
10
600U
CONTROL
12
12
11.5
4.17
4.17
4.8 Density
These are the values of density of the different samples of the composite.
S/N
Sample
Mass(g)
Volume(cm
Density(g/c
1
2
3
4
5
6
40%
50%
60%
40%
50%
60%
36
34
36
37
35
38
3)
25
25
27
24
28
29
m3)
1.44
1.36
1.33
1.54
1.25
1.31
150U
150U
150U
300U
300U
300U
7
8
9
10
40% 600U
50% 600U
60% 600U
CONTROL
35
33
30
37
30
26
27
27
1.17
1.27
1.11
1.37
Chapter five
Conclusion
The electrical insulation properties and mechanical properties of
carbonized cassava cortex mixed with epoxy was determined. The dielectric
properties measured is comparable with those of standard insulator.
However, there moisture contents and their water absorption capacity were
measured. The usefulness as an electrical insulator and their work life was
also determined. Moreover, the resistivity of the composite were studied and
compared with the conventional insulator. The mechanical properties such as
tensile and compressive strength, hardness and impact strength were
extensively examined. This was done to determine the suitable environment
for its application.
For further work on this area, the effect of temperature, frequency and heat
dispersion should be examine as it affect the polarization of the composite
Reference
REFERENCES
Feynman, R., R. Leighton, and M. Sands. Feinmanovskie lektsiipo fizike.
[Issue 5.] Elektrichestvo i magnetizm. Moscow, 1966. (Translated from
English.)
Kalashnikov, C. G. Elektrichestvo, 2nd ed. Moscow, 1964.
Fizicheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar, vol. 1. Moscow, 1960.
Skanavi, G. I. Fizika dielektrikov (Oblast slabykh polei). MoscowLeningrad, 1949.
Skanavi, G. I. Fizika dielektrikov (Oblast silnykh polei). Moscow, 1958.
Frelikh, G., Teoriia dielektrikov. Moscow, 1960.
von Hippel, A. R. Dielektriki i volny. Moscow, 1960. (Translated from
English.)
Zheludev, I. S. Fizika kristallicheskikh dielektrikov. Moscow, 1968.
References
ASTM Standards (1985a), Specification for Water Absorption, Bulk Density,