Anda di halaman 1dari 3

3650 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.

14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2008 / Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Area Maritime Security Committees and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
SECURITY (AMSC) that ‘‘advise, consult with, Order. The Office of Management and
report to, and make recommendations’’ Budget has not reviewed it under that
Coast Guard on matters relating to maritime security Order.
in an AMSC’s port area. See 46 U.S.C. We expect the economic impact of
33 CFR Part 165 70112(a)(2) and 33 CFR 103.205. One this final rule to be so minimal that a
topic the Tampa AMSC discussed is the
[Docket No. USCG–2007–0061, formerly full Regulatory Evaluation is
COTP St. Petersburg 07–226] existing security zones that were
unnecessary. This final rule may have
established following the terrorist
RIN 1625–AA87 some impact on the public, but these
attacks of September 11, 2001. These
potential impacts will be minimized for
existing security zones, created to
Security Zone; Manbirtee Key, Port of the following reasons: There is ample
address identified security issues, were
Manatee, FL room for vessels to navigate around the
established September 3, 2003, codified
security zone, and there are several
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. in 33 CFR 165.760 (68 FR 52340,
September 3, 2003), and September 1, locations for recreational and
ACTION: Final rule. commercial fishing vessels to fish
2003, codified in § 165.764 (68 FR
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 47852, August 12, 2003), after a number throughout the Tampa Bay Region.
establishing a new security zone in the of temporary security zones. Properly vetted personnel who comply
Manbirtee Key area of Port Manatee, In July 2007, using the newly- with additional requirements may gain
Florida. The purpose of this security developed Maritime Security Risk authorization for entry through a port
zone is to ensure the security of vessels, Analysis tool, the AMSC working group zone watch program. Also, the Captain
facilities, and the surrounding area. evaluated risk to the maritime of the Port may, on a case-by-case basis
Entry into the security zone is transportation system (MTS) within allow persons or vessels to enter a
prohibited without the permission of Tampa Bay, and assessed various risk security zone.
the Captain of the Port. mitigation options. The results of the The changes to the regulatory text that
DATES: This rule is effective February risk assessment indicated the need to incorporate the response to the inquiry
21, 2008. establish a new security zone in the received during the comment period do
ADDRESSES: Comments and material vicinity of Manbirtee Key, FL. not have any economic impact. The
received from the public, as well as Discussion of Comments navigational charts of the area already
documents indicated in this preamble as indicate the submerged pipeline.
The Coast Guard received one Adding this description to the
being available in the docket, are part of
question during the comment period: regulatory text has no impact on
docket number USCG–2007–0061
‘‘What infrastructure are you [Coast commerce.
(formerly COTP St. Petersburg 07–226)
Guard] protecting?’’ The purpose of the
and are available for inspection or Small Entities
security zone is to protect pipeline
copying at Coast Guard Sector St.
infrastructures within 500 yards of the
Petersburg, Prevention Department, 155 Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
shore of Manbirtee Key. No changes
Columbia Drive, Tampa, FL 33606–3598 (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
from the proposed rule were made in
between 7:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., whether this rule would have a
response to this comment.
Monday through Friday, except Federal significant economic impact on a
holidays. The rulemaking documents Discussion of Rule substantial number of small entities.
and comment received online are also This final rule creates a security zone The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
available at www.regulations.gov. in the following area: All waters of small businesses, not-for-profit
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tampa Bay, from surface to bottom, organizations that are independently
Lieutenant Jessica Crandell at the surrounding Manbirtee Key, Tampa Bay, owned and operated and are not
Waterways Management Division, FL extending 500 yards from the dominant in their fields, and
Sector St. Petersburg, FL (813) 228–2191 island’s shoreline, in all directions, with governmental jurisdictions with
Ext. 8146. the exception of the Port Manatee populations of less than 50,000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Channel. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
Entry into or remaining on or within U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
Regulatory Information this zone would be prohibited unless a significant economic impact on a
On November 6, 2007, we published authorized by the Captain of the Port substantial number of small entities. No
a notice of proposed rulemaking Sector St. Petersburg or his designated comments were received during the
(NPRM) entitled Security Zone; representative. Persons desiring to comment period regarding potential
Manbirtee Key, Port of Manatee, FL in transit the area of the security zone may impacts on small entities.
the Federal Register (72 FR 62613). We contact the Captain of the Port St.
received no letters in the mail Petersburg or his designee on VHF Assistance for Small Entities
commenting on the proposed rule and channel 16 to seek permission to transit
one comment in the the area. If permission is granted, all Under section 213(a) of the Small
www.regulations.gov electronic docket. persons and vessels must comply with Business Regulatory Enforcement
A public meeting was held on the instructions of the Captain of the Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
November 13, 2007, at 10 a.m. and no Port or his designated representative. we want to assist small entities in
comments were made. A copy of the understanding this rule so that they can
Regulatory Evaluation better evaluate its effects on them and
transcript is available through the
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES

http://www.regulations.gov Web site. This rule is not a ‘‘significant participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of would affect your small business,
Background and Purpose Executive Order 12866, Regulatory organization, or governmental
The Maritime Transportation Security Planning and Review, and does not jurisdiction and you have questions
Act authorized the establishment of require an assessment of potential costs concerning its provisions or options for

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:05 Jan 18, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM 22JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 3651

compliance, please contact the office Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not have concluded that there are no factors
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION an economically significant rule and in this case that would limit the use of
CONTACT, for assistance in does not create an environmental risk to a categorical exclusion under section
understanding this rule. The Coast health or risk to safety that may 2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we
Guard will not retaliate against small disproportionately affect children. believe that this rule should be
entities that question or complain about categorically excluded, under figure 2–
Indian Tribal Governments
this rule or any policy or action of the 1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction,
Coast Guard. This rule does not have tribal from further environmental
implications under Executive Order documentation. A final ‘‘Environmental
Collection of Information 13175, Consultation and Coordination Analysis Check List’’ and a final
This rule calls for no new collection with Indian Tribal Governments, ‘‘Categorical Exclusion Determination’’
of information under the Paperwork because it does not have a substantial are available in the docket where
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– direct effect on one or more Indian indicated under ADDRESSES during the
3520). tribes, on the relationship between the comment period. No comments were
Federal Government and Indian tribes, received regarding the impact to the
Federalism
or on the distribution of power and environment in response to the
A rule has implications for federalism responsibilities between the Federal proposed rule or the preliminary
under Executive Order 13132, Government and Indian tribes. environmental analysis checklist for this
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct security zone.
effect on State or local governments and Energy Effects
would either preempt State law or We have analyzed this rule under List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
impose a substantial direct cost of Executive Order 13211, Actions Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
compliance on them. We have analyzed Concerning Regulations That (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
this rule under that Order and have Significantly Affect Energy Supply, requirements, Security measures,
determined that it does not have Distribution, or Use. We have Waterways.
implications for federalism. The determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
changes to the regulatory text which energy action’’ under that order because Words of Issuance and Regulatory Text
address the inquiry made during the it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
■ For the reasons discussed in the
comment period do not have an impact under Executive Order 12866 and is not
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
on federalism. The navigational charts likely to have a significant adverse effect
CFR part 165 as follows:
of the area already indicate the on the supply, distribution, or use of
submerged pipeline. Adding this energy. The Administrator of the Office PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
description to the regulatory text has no of Information and Regulatory Affairs AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
impact on commerce. has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act require a Statement of Energy Effects continues to read as follows:
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act under Executive Order 13211. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
Technical Standards
Federal agencies to assess the effects of 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5; Pub. L.
their discretionary regulatory actions. In The National Technology Transfer 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
particular, the Act addresses actions and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
that may result in the expenditure by a U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
State, local, or tribal government, in the voluntary consensus standards in their ■ 2. Add § 165.767 to read as follows:
aggregate, or by the private sector of regulatory activities unless the agency § 165.767 Security Zone; Manbirtee Key,
$100,000,000 or more in any one year. provides Congress, through the Office of Port of Manatee, Florida.
Though this rule will not result in such Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these (a) Regulated area. The following area
an expenditure, we do discuss the
standards would be inconsistent with is a security zone: All waters, from
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
applicable law or otherwise impractical. surface to bottom, surrounding
preamble.
Voluntary consensus standards are Manbirtee Key, Tampa Bay, FL
Taking of Private Property technical standards (e.g., specifications extending 500 yards from the island’s
This rule will not effect a taking of of materials, performance, design, or shoreline, in all directions, not to
private property or otherwise have operation; test methods; sampling include the Port Manatee Channel.
taking implications under Executive procedures; and related management (b) Definitions. As used in this
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and systems practices) that are developed or section, designated representative
Interference with Constitutionally adopted by voluntary consensus means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders
Protected Property Rights. standards bodies. including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
This rule does not use technical officers and other officers operating
Civil Justice Reform standards. Therefore, we did not Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State,
This rule meets applicable standards consider the use of voluntary consensus and local officers designated by or
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive standards. assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP),
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to in the enforcement of regulated
Environment navigation areas, safety zones, and
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden. We have analyzed this rule under security zones.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD (c) Regulation. (1) Entry into or


Protection of Children which guides the Coast Guard in remaining on or within the security
We have analyzed this rule under complying with the National zone is prohibited unless authorized by
Executive Order 13045, Protection of Environmental Policy Act of 1969 the Captain of the Port Sector St.
Children from Environmental Health (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and Petersburg or his designee.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:05 Jan 18, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM 22JAR1
3652 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2008 / Rules and Regulations

(2) Persons desiring to transit the ACTION: Final rule; announcement of information collection requirements
security zone may contact the Captain of effective date. subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
the Port Sector St. Petersburg or his The Second Report and Order stated
designee on VHF channel 16 to seek SUMMARY: This document announces the
that the rule changes requiring OMB
permission to transit the area. If effective dates of rules published in the approval would become effective
permission is granted, all persons and Federal Register. The rules relate to
immediately upon announcement in the
vessels must comply with the Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems,
Federal Register of OMB approval. On
instructions of the Captain of the Port or and the notification that those entities
must provide the Federal December 10, 2007, the Office of
designated representative. Management and Budget (OMB)
(3) Enforcement. Under § 165.33, no Communications Commission when
they commence broadcasting digital approved the information collection
person may cause or authorize the
operation of a vessel in the security signals. requirements contained in 47 CFR
zone contrary to the provisions of this 73.404(b), 73.404(e), and 73.1201. This
DATES: The final rules published on information collection is assigned OMB
section. August 15, 2007 (72 FR 45670), Control Nos. 3060–0466 and 3060–1034.
Dated: January 10, 2008. amending 47 CFR 73.404(b), 73.404(e),
This publication satisfies the statement
J.A. Servidio, and 73.1201, are effective January 22,
that the Commission would publish a
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 2008.
document announcing the effective date
Port Sector St. Petersburg. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For of the rule changes requiring OMB
[FR Doc. E8–1013 Filed 1–18–08; 8:45 am] additional information on this approval.
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P proceeding, contact Ann Gallagher,
Ann.Gallagher@fcc.gov, 202–418–2716, Federal Communications Commission.
of the Media Bureau, Audio Division, or Marlene H. Dortch,
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Brendan Murray, Secretary.
COMMISSION Brendan.Murray@fcc.gov, (202) 418– [FR Doc. E8–1008 Filed 1–18–08; 8:45 am]
2120, of the Media Bureau, Policy BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
47 CFR Part 76 Division.
[MM Docket No. 99–325; FCC 07–33] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
Second Report and Order released on
Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems
May 31, 2007, FCC 07–33, and
and Their Impact on the Terrestrial
published in the Federal Register on
Radio Broadcast Service
August 15, 2007, 72 FR 45670, the
AGENCY:Federal Communications Federal Communications Commission
Commission. adopted a new rule which contained
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:05 Jan 18, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM 22JAR1

Anda mungkin juga menyukai