Anda di halaman 1dari 15

3.

2 Flat slabs
3.2.1 Introduction
Slabs which are not supported by beams or walls along the edges but are supported directly
by columns are known as flat slabs (Fig. 3.2.1). The required slab depth for such a system is
generally less than for a one-way spanning slab system but greater than for a two-way
spanning slab system. However, the use of flat slabs results in a reduced depth of structure
overall as beams, when they are present, govern the structural depth. Another great advantage
of this system is that it only requires simple shuttering there are no beams for which
formwork must be prepared. One disadvantage of flat slab construction is that the
arrangement of reinforcement can be very complex, particularly adjacent to columns where
punching shear reinforcement is often required if the slab depth is kept to a minimum.
Flat slabs are often provided with drops or enlarged column heads, as illustrated in Fig.
3.2.2, to increase the shear strength of the slab around the column supports. However, this
substantially increases the complexity of the shuttering, countering one of the principal
advantages of the system.

Figure 3.2.1 Flat slab construction

Figure 3.2.2 Flat slab construction details: (a) no column head; (b) flared column head;
(c) slab with drop panel; (d) flared column head and drop panel.

3.2.2 Methods of Analysis


A flat slab including supporting columns or walls may be analyzed using the equivalent
frame method or, where applicable, the simplified method. The provision in the methods are
for the design of flat slabs supported by a generally rectangular arrangement of columns and
where the ratio of the longer to the shorter spans does not exceed 2. A flat slab is subdivided
into column and middle strips (Fig. 3.2.3). Column strip is a design strip with a width on each
side of a column center-line equal to 0.25Lx or if drops with dimension not less than Lx/3 are
used, a width equal to the drop dimension. Middle strip is a design strip bounded by two
column strips.
For both methods of analysis, the negative moments greater than those at a distance hc/2 from
the center-line of the column may be ignored provided the moment Mo obtained as the sum of
the maximum positive design moment and the average of the negative design moments in any
one span of the slab for the whole panel width is such that:

g qd L2 L
d

2h
M0
1 c
8
3

Where L1 = panel length parallel to span, measured from centers of columns.


L2 = panel width, measured from centers of columns
hc = effective diameter of a column or column head.
When the above condition is not satisfied, the negative design moments shall be increased.

Figure 3.2.3 Division of Panels in Flat Slabs


The effective diameter of a column or column head hc is the diameter of a circle
whose area equals the cross-sectional area of the column or, if column heads are used,
the area of the column head based on the effective dimensions as defined below. In no
case shall hc be taken as greater than one-quarter of the shortest span framing into the
column.
3

The effective dimensions of a column head for use in calculation of hc are limited
according to the depth of the head. In any direction, the effective dimension of a head
Lh shall be taken as
The lesser of the actual dimension Lh o , or Lh,max, where Lh,max is given by:
Lh,max = Lc + 2dh
For a flared head, the actual dimension Lho is that measured to the center of the
reinforcing steel (see Fig. 3.2.4).
A drop may only be considered to influence the distribution of moments within the
slab where the smaller dimension of the drop is at least one third of the smaller
dimension of the surrounding panels. Smaller drops may, however, still be taken into
account when assessing the resistance to punching shear.

Figure 3.2.4 Types of Column Head


Equivalent Frame Method

Structure may be divided longitudinally and transversely into frames consisting of


columns and strips of slab
The width of slab used to define the effective stiffness of the slab will depend upon
the aspect ratio of the panels and the type of loading, but the following provisions
may be applied in the absence of more accurate methods:

In the case of vertical loading, the full width of the panel, and

For lateral loading, half the width of the panel may be used to calculate the
stiffness of the slab.
The moment of inertia of any section of slab or column used in calculating the relative
stiffness of members may be assumed to be that of the cross section of the concrete
alone.
Moments and forces within a system of flat slab panels may be obtained from analysis
of the structure under the single load case of maximum design load on all spans or
panels simultaneously, provided:

The ratio of the characteristic imposed load to the characteristic dead load
does not exceed 1.25.

The characteristic imposed load does not exceed 5.0 kN/m2 excluding
partitions.
Where it is not appropriate to analyze for the single load case of maximum design
load on all spans, it will be sufficient to consider the following arrangements of
vertical loads:

All spans loaded with the maximum design ultimate load, and

Alternative spans with the maximum design ultimate load, and all other spans
loaded with the minimum design ultimate load (1.0Gk)

Each frame may be analyzed in its entirety by any elastic method. Alternatively, for
vertical loads only, each strip of floor and roof may be analyzed as a separate frame
with the columns above and below fixed in position and direction at their extremities,
In either case, the analysis shall be carried out for the appropriate design ultimate
loads on each span calculated for a strip of slab of width equal to the distance between
center lines of the panels on each side of the columns.

Simplified Method
Moments and shear forces in non-sway flat slab structures may be determined using
Table 3.2.1, subject to the conditions described below.
The following limitations shall be observed when using the simplified method:
Design is based on the single load case of all spans loaded with the maximum
design ultimate load.
There are at least three rows of panels of approximately equal span in the direction
being considered.
Successive span length in each direction shall not differ by more than one-third of
the longer span.

Maximum offsets of columns from either axis between center lines of successive
columns shall not exceed 10% of the span (in the direction of the offset).
Table 3.2.1 Bending Moment and Shear Force Coefficients for Flat Slabs of Three or
More Equal Spans

Outer support

Column
Moment
Shear
Total column
moments

Near
First
Center of Interior
first span
support

Center of Interior
interior
support
span

Wall

-0.040FL
0.45F

-0.020FL
0.40F

0.083FL
-

-0.063FL
0.60F

0.071FL
-

-0.055FL
0.50F

0.040FL

0.022FL

0.022FL

NOTE 1. F is the total design ultimate load on the strip of slab between adjacent columns considered.
2. L is the effective span = L1 -2hc/3.
3. The limitations in section 3.2.2 need not be checked.
4. The moments shall not be redistributed.

Figure 3.2.5 Building idealization for equivalent frame analysis

Division of Moments between Column and Middle Strips


The design moments obtained from analysis of the continuous frames using the
Equivalent Frame method or from simplified method shall be divided between the
column and middle strips in the proportions given in Table 3.2.2.
Table 3.2.2 Distribution of Design Moments in Panels of Flat Slabs
Apportionment between column and middle strip expressed as
percentages of the total negative or positive design moment
Column strip (%)

Middle strip (%)

75
55

25
45

Negative
Positive

NOTE: For the case where the width of the column strip is taken as equal to that of the drop,
and the middle strip is thereby increased in width, the design moments to be resisted by the
middle strip shall be increased in proportion to its increased width. The design moments to be
resisted by the column strip may be decreased by an amount such that the total positive and
the total negative design moments resisted by the column strip and middle strip together are
unchanged.

3.2.3 Design Considerations


General
Details of reinforcement in flat slabs shall be as follows:
The reinforcement in flat slabs shall have minimum bend point locations and
extensions for reinforcement as prescribed in Fig. 3.2.6.
Where adjacent spans are unequal, extension of negative reinforcement beyond the
face of support as prescribed in Fig. 3.2.6 shall be based on requirements of longer
span.
Bent bars may be used only when depth-to-span ratio permits use of bends 450 or
less.
For flat slabs in frames not braced against side sway and for flat slabs resisting lateral
loads, lengths of reinforcement shall be determined by analysis but shall not be less than
those prescribed in Fig. 3.2.6.

Figure 3.2.6 Minimum Bend Point Location and Extension for Reinforcement in Flat
Slabs
8

Internal panels
The column and middle strips shall be designed to withstand the design moments
obtained from section 3.2.2.
Two-thirds of the amount of reinforcement required to resist the negative design moment
in the column strip shall be placed in a width equal to half that of the column strip and
central with the column. This concentration of reinforcement over the column will
increase the capacity of the slab for transfer of moment to the column by flexure (see
Section 3.2.4)
Edge panels
The design moments shall be apportioned and designed exactly as for an internal panel,
using the same column and middle strips as for an internal panel.

3.2.4 Moment Transfer between Slab and Column


(a) When gravity load, wind, earthquake, or other lateral forces cause transfer of moment
between slab and column, a fraction of the unbalanced moment shall be transferred by
flexure. Fraction of unbalanced moment not transferred by flexure shall be transferred
by eccentricity of shear in accordance with Section 3.2.4.
(b) A fraction of the unbalanced moment given by
1

1 b1 b2
shall be considered transferred by flexure over an effective slab width between lines
that are one and one half slab or drop panel thickness (1.5h) outside opposite faces of
the column or capital.
(c) Concentration of reinforcement over the column by closer spacing as specified in
Section 3.2.2, or additional reinforcement must be used to resist the unbalanced
moment on the effective slab width defined in (b).
(d) The design for transfer of load from slab to supporting columns or walls through shear
and torsion shall be in accordance with Section 3.2.4.
(e) As an alternative to (b) above, the slab may be designed for the minimum bending
moments per unit width, msdx and msdy in the x and y direction, respectively, given by
Equation below (see Fig. 3.2.7).

Msdx (or msdy) nVsd


Where Vsd is the shear force developed along the critical section
n is the moment coefficient given in Table 3.2.3.
(f) In checking the corresponding resisting moments, only those reinforcing bars shall be
taken into account, which are appropriately anchored beyond the critical area (Fig.
3.2.8)
(g) Where analysis of the structure indicates a design column moment larger than the
moment Mt,max which can be transferred by flexure and shear combined (in accordance
with (b) and (d) above), the design edge moment in the slab shall be reduced to a value
not greater than Mt,max and the positive design moments in the span adjusted
accordingly. The normal limitations on redistributions and neutral axis depth may be
disregarded in this case.
(h) Moments in excess of Mt,max may only be trsnsferred to a column if an edge beam or
strip of slab along the free edge is reinforced to carry the extra moment into the column
by torsion.
(i) In the absence of an edge beam, an appropriate breadth of slab may be assessed by using
the principles illustrated in Fig. 3.2.9, for transfer of moment between the slab and an
edge or corner column.
Table 3.2.3 Moment Coefficient nfor Equation (A.10)

Position of
column
Internal column
Edge columns
Edge of slab
Parallel, to xaxis
Edge columns
Edge of slab
Parallel to y-axis
Corner column

n for msdy

Effective
width

n for msdy
top
bottom

Effective
width

top
-0.125

bottom
0

0.3Ly

-0.125

0.3Lx

-0.25

0.15Ly

-0.125

0.125

(per m)

-0.125
-0.5

0.125
0.5

(per m)
(per m)

-0.25
-0.5

0
0.5

0.15.Lx
(per m)

10

Figure 3.2.7 Bending Moments mSdx and mSdy in Slab-Column Joints subjected to
Eccentric Loading, and Effective Width for resisting these Moments.

Figure 3.2.8 Detailing Reinforcement over Edge and Corner Columns

11

Figure 3.2.9 Definition of Breadth of Effective Moment Transfer Strip be for


Typical Cases

3.2.5 Design of slabs for punching shear


The punching shear failure mechanism illustrated in Fig. 3.2.10 can occur in any two-way
spanning members which are supported directly by columns or which are acted on by heavy
concentrated loads. The cross-sectional shape of the supporting column or the concentrated
load, known as the loaded area, determines the shape of the failure surface in the concrete
slab. In particular, circular loaded areas cause conical wedges to form and rectangular loaded
areas cause pyramidal wedges to form. For design purposes, the inclined surfaces are
represented by vertical ones. It is assumed that these vertical surfaces occur at a constant
distance from the edges of the loaded area as illustrated in Fig. 3.2.11. The corresponding
perimeter, illustrated in both figures, is known as the critical perimeter.

12

Figure 3.2.10 Punching shear failure at column


support

Figure 3.2.11 Critical perimeters for punching shear


13

Checking for punching shear in slabs with constant depth


As for regular shear, the average applied shear stress in a member with punching shear is
given by equation:
= V/bwd
However , in the case of members with punching shear, the breadth of the section in shear
is equal to the length of the critical perimeter. Further , with punching shear, there are two
effective depths, one for reinforcement running parallel to the X-axis and one for
reinforcement running parallel to the Y-axis (the layers of reinforcement will, of
necessity, be at different depths as one must rest on the other). Thus, for punching shear,
the average shear stress becomes:
= V/udav
where u = length of the critical perimeter
dav = average of the two effective depths.
The shear strength, c, for members subjected to punching, is calculated differently
c = 0.25fctdk1k2udav

Where:

k1 1 50 e 2.0

k 2 1.6 d 1.0 - scale effect parameter (d in meters)


d av d x d y 2

e ex ey 0.015 - effective longitudinal reinforcement ratio.


1

ex and ex = geometric ratios longitudinal reinforcement parallel to x and y,


respectively
When the punching shear force due to applied loads is eccentric to the loaded area or the
force is combined with a moment as would happen in an edge or corner column (see Fig.
3.2.12), the adverse effect of the applied load is significantly increased. This effect is
allowed for by the multiplication of the applied force, Vsd , by a factor . When no
eccentricity of loading is possible, =1. In other cases, can be taken from equation
below or Fig. 3.2.12.
Veq = Vsd

14

Where:

1eud Z
e = eccentricity of the load or reaction with respect to the centroid of the
critical section, always positive.
Z = section modulus of the critical section, corresponding to the direction of
the eccentricity.

1 1 b2 b1 - fraction of moment which is considered transferred by


eccentricity of the shear about the centroid of the critical section.
b1 and b2 = sides of the rectangle of outline u, b1 being parallel to the direction
of the eccentricity e.

Figure 3.2.12 Factor to allow for eccentricity of loading

15