1093/brain/awt158
| 313
BRAIN
A JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
REVIEW ARTICLE
Introduction
We have all experienced an itch (pruritus). It is a common
phenomenon of remarkable complexity that has received little attention in neurological circles. In the past 15 years, important
advances have occurred in the study of itch. The purpose of this
paper is to review these developments and their clinical
implications.
Received January 26, 2013. Revised March 26, 2013. Accepted April 8, 2013. Advance Access publication June 22, 2013
The Authors (2013). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved.
For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Research over the past 15 years has helped to clarify the anatomy and physiology of itch, the clinical features of neuropathic itch
syndromes and the scientific underpinning of effective treatments. Two itch-sensitive pathways exist: a histamine-stimulated
pathway that uses mechanically insensitive C-fibres, and a cowhage-stimulated pathway primarily involving polymodal C-fibres.
Interactions with pain continue to be central to explaining various aspects of itch. Certain spinal interneurons (Bhlhb5) inhibit
itch pathways within the dorsal horn; they may represent mediators between noxious and pruritic pathways, and allow scratch
to inhibit itch. In the brain, functional imaging studies reveal diffuse activation maps for itch that overlap, but not identically,
with pain maps. Neuropathic itch syndromes are chronic itch states due to dysfunction of peripheral or central nervous system
structures. The most recognized are postherpetic itch, brachioradial pruritus, trigeminal trophic syndrome, and ischaemic strokerelated itch. These disorders affect a patients quality of life to a similar extent as neuropathic pain. Treatment of neuropathic
itch focuses on behavioural interventions (e.g., skin protection) followed by stepwise trials of topical agents (e.g., capsaicin),
antiepileptic drugs (e.g., gabapentin), injection of other agents (e.g., botulinum A toxin), and neurostimulation techniques (e.g.,
cutaneous field stimulation). The involved mechanisms of action include desensitization of nerve fibres (in the case of capsaicin)
and postsynaptic blockade of calcium channels (for gabapentin). In the future, particular histamine receptors, protease pathway
molecules, and vanilloids may serve as targets for novel antipruritic agents.
314
Representative conditions
Dermatological
Atopic dermatitis
Bullous pemphigoid
Psoriasis
Urticaria
Pruritus ani
Systemic
Cholestasis
Uremia
Hodgkins lymphoma and other malignancy
Polycythemia vera rubra
Graves disease
Iron-deficiency anemia
Diabetes mellitus
Infectious
See Table 2
Psychiatric
Depression
Delusional parasitosis
Neurotic excoriations
Other
Pregnancy
Itch in the elderly
In some cases, such as uraemia or HIV infection, a specific disorder has multiple
causes for itch, but the disorder has been placed in a single category for simplicity.
instances are unclear, some have suggested that pathological disruption of the antagonistic interaction unmasks normally silent
neuronal pathways that allow a sensory stimulus to evoke a
new sensation, such as a painful stimulus evoking itch (Ma, 2012).
a peripheral neuropathy. The sensation may be localized or widespread, commonly outlasts any inciting mechanical stimulus, and is
sometimes accompanied by skin changes. Itchy skin (alloknesis) is
itch that is augmented by light touch or brushing of the skin
around an itching source. Similarly, hyperknesis is itch that is
enhanced when prick is applied to the same surrounding skin
area. Itch is a multidimensional perception with psychological aspects, as exemplified by its induction by thought of an irritating
stimulus (Ikoma et al., 2006). The scratch phenomenon, which
may be painful in other instances, may paradoxically be pleasurable in the setting of itch. Other motor responses to itch include
rubbing or kneading the skin. The local application of cold may
also alleviate itch.
An important distinction is between acute and chronic itch.
Acute itch is the sensation experienced when itch-inducing stimuli
(pruritogens) contact the skin, and usually is relieved by pain
(including scratch) in the surrounding area. Chronic itch is the
persistent sensation that results from various causes in which
pain does not relieve itch, and may actually be perceived as
itch. Table 1 shows some common causes of chronic itch. By analogy to pain, two main mechanisms of chronic itch have been
proposed. Peripheral sensitization is the decreased activation
threshold and increased basal activity of itch-related receptors
and nerve fibres (Potenzieri and Undem, 2012). Central sensitization results from the neuroplasticity that occurs in the spinal cord
and brain such that non-pruritic stimuli are perceived as, or augment, itch. Together, these are the likely mechanisms of alloknesis
and hyperknesis described earlier.
Itch and pain are distinct sensations that interact. The clearest
differentiation is the effector limb of bothwithdrawal for pain
compared with scratch for itch. The interaction between itch and
pain traditionally has been thought to be antagonistic, with pain
dominant over itch (Stander et al., 2003; Binder et al., 2008). This
is most evident when noxious counter-stimuli on the skin suppress
itch sensation, and when opioids inhibit pain but cause itch
(Handwerker, 2010; Schmelz, 2010). The mechanism of this itch
suppression is probably central, as supported by at least two experimental observations: (i) noxious counter-stimuli may be several
centimetres or more away from the itch source, suggesting that
different afferent fibres are activated and their signals integrated
at the spinal cord level (Seo et al., 2009; Davidson and Giesler,
2010); and (ii) secondary hyperalgesia induced by various noxious
stimuli in a skin patch of several centimetres abolishes cowhage or
histamine-induced itch in that area, consistent with a central excitatory state that activates pain and blocks itch (Brull et al., 1999;
Binder et al., 2008).
Unfortunately, a direct antagonistic relation is too simplistic
when pathological lesions are considered. Depending on the location and pathophysiology of the lesion, there are varied manifestations. For instance, herpes zoster neuropathy can produce either
chronic pain or itch, or pain and itch concomitantly (Oaklander
et al., 2002; Ikoma et al., 2006). Further, many central causes of
itch (e.g. spinal cavernous hemangioma) are associated with no
reduction in pain despite very prominent itch (Potenzieri and
Undem, 2012; Lanotte et al., 2013). Lastly, hyperknesis, in
which itch is augmented by pain, also implicates a reversal of
the traditional model. Although the exact mechanisms in these
Itch
| 315
that are not specific to the stimulus and that deliver a series of
signals modulated and decoded centrally (Craig, 2003).
The strongest evidence for a labelled line for itch came from
studies using microneurography, spinal cord electrophysiology
mapping, and genetic modification techniques. Schmelz et al.
(1997) using microneurography in humans, described a histamine-stimulated itch pathway consisting of mechanically insensitive C-fibres that responded with a temporal profile consistent
with itch as rated by human subjects. These fibres were characterized as slowly conducting thin axons with large innervation
territories on the skin. Subsequently, a complementary histamine-stimulated central pathway for itch consisting of lamina I
spinothalamic tract neurons was mapped in the spinal cord of
cats (Andrew and Craig, 2001). These neurons had distinct conduction velocities and thalamic projections, differentiating them
from pain or temperature projections. In a genetic mouse model,
Sun and Chen (2007) identified a subset of dorsal root ganglion
neurons releasing gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) and their receptors (gastrin-releasing peptide receptor; GRPR) located in lamina I
of the spinal cord. When GRPR was genetically knocked out or
antagonized pharmacologically, scratching behaviour was inhibited. Most recently, Han et al. (2013) described a set of
MrgprA3-positive neurons in the dorsal root ganglion of mice
that innervate the epidermis and respond to multiple pruritogens.
Ablation of these neurons reduced itch behaviour; conversely,
their excitation, regardless of the stimulus (even when pain-producing, i.e., an algogen), evoked a scratch response.
The labelled-line theory does not explain two experimental observations: (i) the itch pathway may be activated by pain-producing stimuli; and (ii) different pruritogens may activate other
peripheral pathways. The strongest experimental evidence for
the first point was provided by Schmelz et al. (2003) who studied
the response of previously identified itch fibres to capsaicin and
bradykinin, which are algogenic agents. They showed that such
algogens activated mechanically insensitive C-fibres initially
thought to be specific for histaminergic itch.
The second point was fuelled by study of the pruritogen cowhage. Originating from the Hindi term kiwach meaning bad rubbing, cowhage is the common name for barbed hairs of the
tropical plant Mucuna pruriens (Namer et al., 2008). The spicules
cause an intense itch without extended erythema, making it a
useful agent to study non-histaminergic itch. Namer et al.
(2008) used microneurography to study cowhage-induced itch in
humans. They found that cowhage stimulated mechanically responsive or polymodal C-fibres and not the mechanically insensitive fibres related to histamine-induced itch. This finding accords
with observations that cowhage and histamine activate different
spinothalamic neurons in primate spinal cords (Davidson et al.,
2007). Cowhage also activates a subpopulation of A-delta thinly
myelinated fibres in addition to unmyelinated afferents (Ringkamp
Figure 1 Peripheral anatomy of itch. Two itch pathways (histamine in blue, cowhage in red) and the peripheral limb of the pain pathway
(green) are shown. The itch pathways are stimulated by histamine and cowhage skin receptors in the epidermis and dermis, respectively.
Impulses are transmitted primarily via mechanically insensitive C-fibres and polymodal C-fibres, respectively, to secondary neurons in the
dorsal horn. One means of modulation by the pain pathway (depicted only partially) is through a Bhlbb5 interneuron. STT = spinothalamic
tract; Bhlbb5 = transcription factor protein; CMi = mechano-insensitive C-fibres; C-polymodal = polymodal C-fibres.
316
in the spinal cord to mediate itch (Sun and Chen, 2007; Sun et al.,
2009). Koga et al. (2011) found that glutamate, not GRP, is the
primary neurotransmitter binding to GRPR. Histamine and cowhage primary afferents do not activate or converge on the same
secondary neuron, suggesting mutually exclusive dual projections
in the spinothalamic tract that mediate itch (Davidson et al.,
2007).
The dorsal horn synapse likely represents the site of modulation
by parallel pain-processing neurons and descending pathways
from the brain. In mice, a population of inhibitory interneurons
(Bhlhb5 neurons) inhibit itch within the dorsal horn, and loss of
these neurons result in persistent itch (Ross et al., 2010). Such
interneurons may represent the mediators between noxious and
pruritic pathways, and serve as the cellular basis of how scratch
inhibits itch (Ross, 2011). This concept is supported by the observation that scratching inhibits spinothalamic neurons during histamine-evoked activity but not spontaneous activity (Davidson
et al., 2009). There is also biochemical evidence that scratching
excites inhibitory interneurons to release glycine and gammaaminobutyric acid and thereby inhibit itch-responsive neurons
(Akiyama et al., 2011).
The evidence for central sensitization in itch is accumulating. In
one study, such sensitization was demonstrated in patients with
atopic dermatitis, who were more likely than healthy subjects to
perceive noxious stimuli as itchy, even though such stimuli usually
reduce itch. Further, when conditioned with histamine, the healthy
participants also reported that noxious stimuli caused itchiness. It
was suggested that the chronic pruriceptive input caused central
sensitization for itch andin consequencepain stimuli caused
rather than inhibited itch (Ikoma et al., 2004). Unlike pain,
study of the molecular mechanisms of central sensitization in
itch pathways is still in its early stages. Nevertheless, it is known
that toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) induces spinal cord long-term potentiation, resulting in central sensitization and synaptic plasticity.
In mice lacking the Tlr3 gene, there is decreased scratching in
response to both histaminergic and non-histamingeric pruritogens
(Liu et al., 2012).
A number of thalamic nuclei are implicated in the itch pathway.
Cowhage-sensitive itch neurons have a broader thalamic representation than histamine-responsive itch neurons. Both sets of neurons have axons terminating in the contralateral ventral posterior
lateral, ventral posterior inferior, and posterior nuclei, but cowhage
neurons have additional projections to the contralateral suprageniculate and medial geniculate nuclei (Davidson et al., 2012) (Fig.
2). Neuroimaging data suggest an increased activation of thalamic
nuclei including the pulvinar in cowhage itch (Papoiu et al., 2012),
but this was not confirmed in the above electrophysiology studies.
Functional neuroimaging studies (PET and functional MRI) have
been used in humans to study brain regions implicated in itch.
Multifocal regions related to perception, evaluative processes, motivation, attention, emotion, and motor function are involved. This
parallels regions involved in pain processing, though not identically. Specifically, most studies reveal activation of the thalamus,
somatosensory cortex, parietal cortex, motor areas (primary motor
cortex, supplementary motor area, premotor cortex), prefrontal
cortex, anterior cingulate gyrus, insula, and midbrain (Hsieh
et al., 1994; Drzezga et al., 2001; Mochizuki et al., 2003;
Itch
| 317
Figure 2 Central anatomy of itch. Histamine (red) and cowhage (blue) itch fibres travel in the spinothalamic tract to the thalamic nuclei
(listed in the left box) usually contralateral to the stimulus. Cowhage neurons project to a broader set of nuclei than histamine neurons
[data derived from Davidson et al. (2012) and Papoiu et al. (2012)]. Thalamic neurons transmit to multiple cortical and subcortical
structures (listed in the right box) with a more diffuse pattern in cowhage itch. These structures are usually activated in a bilateral and
symmetric pattern, except that the insular cortex, claustrum, basal ganglia, and putamen have a minor emphasis contralateral to the
stimulus [data derived from Leknes et al. (2007); Papoiu et al. (2012)]. STT = spinothalamic tract.
318
Representative conditions
Peripheral
(receptors,
nerve, root)
Spinal cord
Brain
Postherpetic itch
This disorder, analogous to postherpetic neuralgia, is a chronic itch
state in which refractory itch occurs in a region previously affected
by shingles. In one remarkable case, a 39-year-old woman with
postherpetic itch scratched through the skull into her frontal lobe
after ophthalmic zoster. Quantitative study showed loss in the skin
patch of all sensory modalities except itch, which was enhanced
by histamine. Immunolabelled skin biopsies showed near-complete
loss of epidermal innervation by afferent nerve processes. The
authors suggest that analgesic skin led to a lack of inhibitory
pain signals and hyperactivity of central itch neurons (Oaklander
et al., 2002).
Brachioradial pruritus
Brachioradial pruritus is itchcommonly combined with tingling,
burning, and stingingin the dorsolateral aspect of the upper arm
and is often bilateral. Two predominant mechanisms have been
suggested: (i) sun exposure causing symptoms with seasonal variation; and (ii) intervertebral foraminal narrowing with compression
of nerve roots causing non-seasonal symptoms. The first mechanism was more common in a study of 95 patients (Veien and
Laurberg, 2011).
Notalgia paraesthetica
A peripheral neuropathy of the posterior rami of the thoracic
nerves in the area of the second and sixth vertebrae probably
accounts for this syndrome. Typically, pruritus occurs with or without sensory loss in an area just medial to the scapula border in the
associated dermatomes. Some have attributed this disorder to
spinal nerve root impingement by degenerative changes
(Savk and Savk, 2005). We favour damage to the peripheral
nerves by musculoskeletal compression; such an aetiology is
supported by the finding of a reduced intraepidermal nerve fibre
density in the pruritic region compared with an anatomically
identical non-involved site (Huesmann et al., 2012).
Cerebral disorders
In the brain, itch syndromes usually have a subcortical or brainstem localization, and are most commonly caused by ischaemic
Itch
Pharmacological therapies
As neuropathic itch is often induced without the involvement of
histamine, it is not surprising that antihistamines are generally unhelpful in treatment. Any benefit appears related more to the
somnolent side effects of H1-antihistamines than to a more specific antipruritic effect (Summey and Yosipovitch, 2005).
| 319
strokes. Unilateral pruritus has been described in brainstem, thalamic, subcortical and, rarely, cortical ischaemic strokes (KimyaiAsadi et al., 1999; Seo et al., 2009; Curtis et al., 2012). Similar
to central neuropathic pain, symptoms may develop several days
to weeks after stroke (Kimyai-Asadi et al., 1999). In lateral
medullary ischaemic strokes, in particular, there is a predisposition
to cause facial neuropathic itch that may lead to trigeminal trophic
syndrome (Seo et al., 2009). The latter develops when patients
not only have facial itch, but also hypoaesthesia that results in
scratching to the point of self-injury (Fitzek et al., 2006). The
mechanism of post-stroke pruritus is unclear, but disrupted central
modulatory structures may be involved to produce central
sensitization.
Similar to strokes, neoplasms, especially in the posterior fossa,
may manifest with localized persistent itch of the face or upper
body (Darken et al., 2009). One patient who developed intense
itch of the left face and trunk was found to have a brainstem
paraneoplastic disorder associated with prostate cancer (Berger
et al., 2009). Itch is relatively common in familial CreutzfeldtJakob disease carrying the E200K mutation. Imaging data in
these cases show damage to the midbrain periaqueductal grey
matter suggesting alteration of central itch modulation (Cohen
et al., 2011). In demyelinating disorders, paroxysmal itch may
particularly affect patients with brainstem or spinal cord plaques.
In a study of neuromyelitis optica, 27.3% of patients reported itch
within a week of other symptoms of transverse myelitis that usually involved the central cord. The high frequency, especially compared to itch in multiple sclerosis (4.5%), may be due to more
direct involvement of dorsal horn neurons and peri-aqueductal
pathways (Elsone et al., 2012).
320
Neurostimulation treatment
Surgical treatment
Except for a case report of microsurgical decompression in notalgia
paraesthetica (Class IV evidence) (Williams et al., 2010), little has
been published on neurosurgical interventions in the management
of chronic itch syndromes, and the role of such interventions is
unclear at this time.
Other therapies
Certain other therapies, which have been used to treat non-neuropathic itch, may also be tried in patients with otherwise refractory
neuropathic syndromes (Feramisco et al., 2010), although no evidence of efficacy in neuropathic itch has been published. Muopioid receptor antagonists and kappa-opioid receptor agonists
may alleviate pruritus occurring in the context of systemic or
skin diseases. Naloxone has antipruritic effects due to modulation
of mu-opioid sensitive interneurons or wide dynamic range neurons in the spinal cord (Schmelz, 2001). It is an effective treatment
for opioid-induced itch, cholestatic itch, chronic urticaria and
atopic dermatitis (Phan et al., 2010). Nalfurafine and butorphanol
activate cutaneous kappa-opioid receptors without central side effects, and decrease itch especially in patients with uraemia (Reich
and Szepietowski, 2012).
Acknowledgements
We thank Jon Levine, MD, PhD, for reviewing an early version of
the manuscript, and Ms. Kathleen Jee for developing the figures.
References
Ahuja RB, Gupta R, Gupta G, Shrivastava P. A comparative analysis of
cetirizine, gabapentin and their combination in the relief of post-burn
pruritus. Burns 2011; 37: 2037.
Akiyama T, Iodi Carstens M, Carstens E. Transmitters and pathways
mediating inhibition of spinal itch-signaling neurons by scratching
and other counterstimuli. PLoS One 2011; 6: e22665.
Akiyama T, Tominaga M, Davoodi A, Nagamine M, Blansit K, Horwitz A,
et al. Cross-sensitization of histamine-independent itch in mouse primary sensory neurons. Neuroscience 2012; 226: 30512.
Andrew D, Craig AD. Spinothalamic lamina I neurons selectively sensitive
to histamine: a central neural pathway for itch. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4:
727.
Berger JR, Bensalem M, Dalmau J. A brainstem paraneoplastic syndrome
associated with prostate cancer. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;
80: 9345.
Bhatti AF, Soggiu D, Orlando A. Trigeminal trophic syndrome: diagnosis
and management difficulties. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 1e3e.
Bin Saif GA, Alajroush A, McMichael A, Kwatra SG, Chan Y-H,
McGlone F, et al. Aberrant C nerve fibre function of the healthy
scalp. Br J Dermatol 2012; 167: 4859.
Binder A, Koroschetz J, Baron R. Disease mechanisms in neuropathic itch.
Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2008; 4: 32937.
Bond LD, Keough GC. Neurogenic pruritus: a case of pruritus induced by
transverse myelitis. Br J Dermatol 2003; 149: 204205.
Brull SJ, Atanassoff PG, Silverman DG, Zhang J, LaMotte RH.
Attenuation of experimental pruritus and mechanically evoked dysesthesiae in an area of cutaneous allodynia. Somatosens Mot Res
1999; 16: 299303.
Bueller HA, Bernhard JD, Dubroff LM. Gabapentin treatment for brachioradial pruritus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1999; 13: 2278.
Cable WJ, Kolodny EH, Adams RD. Fabry disease: impaired autonomic
function. Neurology 1982; 32: 498502.
Cohen OS, Chapman J, Lee H, Nitsan Z, Appel S, Hoffman C, et al.
Pruritus in familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a common symptom
associated with central nervous system pathology. J Neurol 2011;
258: 8995.
Craig ADB. Pain mechanisms: labeled lines versus convergence in central
processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 2003; 26: 130.
Crevits L. Brachioradial pruritusa peculiar neuropathic disorder. Clin
Neurol Neurosurg 2006; 108: 8035.
Itch
| 321
Jeffry J, Kim S, Chen ZF. Itch signaling in the nervous system. Physiology
(Bethesda) 2011; 26: 28692.
Johnson RE, Kanigsberg ND, Jimenez CL. Localized pruritus: a presenting
symptom of a spinal cord tumor in a child with features of neurofibromatosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 43: 95861.
Kavak A, Dosoglu M. Can a spinal cord tumor cause brachioradial pruritus? J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 46: 43740.
Kavanagh GM, Tidman MJ. Botulinum A toxin and brachioradial pruritus.
Br J Dermatol 2012; 166: 1147.
Kimyai-Asadi A, Nousari HC, Kimyai-Asadi T, Milani F. Poststroke pruritus. Stroke 1999; 30: 6923.
Kini SP, DeLong LK, Veledar E, McKenzie-Brown AM, Schaufele M,
Chen SC. The impact of pruritus on quality of life: the skin equivalent
of pain. Arch Dermatol 2011; 147: 11536.
Knotkova H, Portenoy RK, Cruciani RA. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) relieved itching in a patient with chronic neuropathic
pain. Clin J Pain 2013; 29: 6212.
Koga K, Chen T, Li XY, Descalzi G, Ling J, Gu J, et al. Glutamate acts as
a neurotransmitter for gastrin releasing peptide-sensitive and insensitive itch-related synaptic transmission in mammalian spinal cord. Mol
Pain 2011; 7: 47.
Lanotte M, Panciani PP, Magistrello M, Naldi A, Fontanella M, Ducati A,
et al. Central neuropathic itch as the presenting symptom of an intramedullary cavernous hemangioma: case report and review of literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115: 4546.
Lee SS, Yosipovitch G, Chan YH, Goh CL. Pruritus, pain, and small nerve
fiber function in keloids: a controlled study. J Am Acad Dermatol
2004; 51: 10026.
Leknes SG, Bantick S, Willis CM, Wilkinson JD, Wise RG, Tracey I. Itch
and motivation to scratch: an investigation of the central and peripheral correlates of allergen- and histamine-induced itch in humans.
J Neurophysiol 2007; 97: 41522.
Liang Y, Marcusson JA, Johansson O. Light and electron microscopic
immunohistochemical observations of p75 nerve growth factor receptor-immunoreactive dermal nerves in prurigo nodularis. Arch Dermatol
Res 1999; 291: 1421.
Liu T, Berta T, Xu Z-Z, Park C-K, Zhang L, Lu N, et al. TLR3 deficiency
impairs spinal cord synaptic transmission, central sensitization, and
pruritus in mice. J Clin Invest 2012; 122: 2195207.
Ma Q. Population coding of somatic sensations. Neurosci Bull 2012; 28:
919.
Mochizuki H, Tashiro M, Kano M, Sakurada Y, Itoh M, Yanai K. Imaging
of central itch modulation in the human brain using positron emission
tomography. Pain 2003; 105: 33946.
Nagel MA, Gilden D. The trigeminal trophic syndrome. Neurology 2011;
77: 1499.
Nakamizo S, Miyachi Y, Kabashima K. Treatment of neuropathic itch
possibly due to trigeminal trophic syndrome with 0.1% topical tacrolimus and gabapentin. Acta Derm Venereol 2010; 90: 6545.
Namer B, Carr R, Johanek LM, Schmelz M, Handwerker HO, Ringkamp M.
Separate peripheral pathways for pruritus in man. J Neurophysiol 2008;
100: 20629.
Oaklander AL. Neuropathic itch. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2011; 30:
8792.
Oaklander AL, Cohen SP, Raju SV. Intractable postherpetic itch and cutaneous deafferentation after facial shingles. Pain 2002; 96: 912.
Papoiu AD, Coghill RC, Kraft RA, Wang H, Yosipovitch G. A tale of two
itches. Common features and notable differences in brain activation
evoked by cowhage and histamine induced itch. Neuroimage 2012;
59: 361123.
Perez-Perez L, Allegue F, Fabeiro JM, Caeiro JL, Zulaica A. Notalgia
paresthesica successfully treated with narrow-band UVB: report of
five cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010; 24: 7302.
Phan NQ, Bernhard JD, Luger TA, Stander S. Antipruritic treatment with
systemic m-opioid receptor antagonists: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol
2010; 63: 6808.
Potenzieri C, Undem BJ. Basic mechanisms of itch. Clin Exp Allergy 2012;
42: 819.
322