Regional Variation in Agricultural Productivity, ICAR, 2009 PDF

Discussion Paper NPP 01/2009
Regional Variations in Agricultural

Productivity
A District Level Study
Ramesh Chand, Sanjeev Garg

and
Lalmani Pandey
2009
National Professor Project

National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research
(Indian Council of Agricultural Researh)
New Delhi
CONTENTS
Acknowledgements
ix
1 Introduction
Data and Methodology
2.1
The Model
2.2
Data Limitations and Proxies
Variations in Agricultural Productivity

3.1
Distribution in Broad Categories
12
3.2
Factors Affecting Productivity
14
Effect of Various Factors on Productivity

and Poverty
16
3.3

4
State Level Analysis of District Wise Productivity
Jammu & Kashmir

Himachal Pradesh
Punjab
Haryana
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
List of districts in different regions of Uttar Pradesh
Bihar
Jharkhand
Orissa
West Bengal
Assam
Rajasthan
Gujarat
... iii ...
19
22
23
23
24
25
25
26
28
29
29
30
31
31
33
Maharashtra
Madhya Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Tamil Nadu
Kerala
Arunachal Pradesh
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
5
33
34
35
35
37
38
38
39
41
41
41
Conclusions
43
References
45
... iv ...
Tables:
Table 1: Distribution of districts in different
productivity classes
11
Table 2: Distribution of districts in broad productivity

categories
12
Table 3: Productivity levels and characteristics for

different categories of productivity
15
Table 4: Estimates of simultaneous equation model on

effect of various factors on productivity and
rural poverty
17
Table 5: Estimate of elasticity of per hectare productivity

and rural poverty with respect to various factors
based on district level data excluding mountain
districts, 2003-04 and 2004-05
18
Table 6: Distribution of districts in different States according

to productivity
20
Figures:
Fig. 1:

Frequency distribution of districts according to

different productivity ranges
10
Fig. 2 :

Distribution of districts in different productivity

ranges
13
Fig. 3: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Jammu

& Kashmir : Rs./ha NSA
22
Fig. 4: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Himachal Pradesh : Rs./ha NSA
23
Fig. 5: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Punjab :

Rs./ha NSA
24
Fig. 6: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Haryana :

Rs./ha NSA
25
Fig. 7: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Uttarakhand :

Rs./ha NSA
26
... v ...

Uttar Pradesh : Rs./ha NSA
27
Fig. 9: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Bihar :

Rs./ha NSA
28
Fig. 10: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Jharkhand :

Rs./ha NSA
29
Fig. 11: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Orissa :

Rs./ha NSA
30

West Bengal : Rs./ha NSA
31
Fig. 13: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Assam :

Rs./ha NSA
32
Fig. 14: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Rajasthan :

Rs./ha NSA
32
Fig. 15: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Gujarat :

Rs./ha NSA
33

Maharashtra : Rs./ha NSA
34

Madhya Pradesh : Rs./ha NSA
35

Chhattisgarh : Rs./ha NSA
36

Andhra Pradesh: Rs./ha NSA
37

Karnataka : Rs./ha NSA
38
... vi ...

Tamil Nadu : Rs./ha NSA
39

Kerala : Rs./ha NSA
40

Arunachal Pradesh : Rs./ha NSA
40

Meghalaya : Rs./ha NSA
41

Mizoram : Rs./ha NSA
42

Nagaland : Rs./ha NSA
42
... vii ...
Annexures:
Annexure I:

Per hectare productivity in various districts

of India arranged in ascending order,
alongwith other salient characteristics
47
Annexure II:

Per hectare productivity in various districts

of india arranged in alphabetic orders of
various states, alongwith other salient
characteristics
78
Annexure III: Statewise list of districts in different

productivity categories

(A) List of districts falling under very

low productivity / ha NSA category:
110
(B) List of districts falling under low

productivity / ha NSA category:
111
(C) List of districts falling under average

113
(D) List of districts falling under high

114
(E) List of districts falling under very high

115
... viii ...
Acknowledgements
This is the third paper in the series of Discussion Papers drawn from
the research done in the National Professor Project at National Centre
for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi. The main
purpose of this paper was to prepare estimates of agricultural productivity
at district level for the most recent period. These estimates will help
in identifying disaggregate geographic regions according to status of
productivity which is essential to prepare location specific strategies for
future growth and development of agriculture sector in the country.
The data for this study was collected and compiled by the research
team in National Professor Project consisting of Dr. Sanjeev Garg, Sh.
Amit Jaiswal, Sh. Pawan Yadav and Ms. Sonalika Surbhi. Dr. Sanjeev
Garg undertook the major responsibility in preparing the estimates
of productivity and related information at district level. The help of
Dr. S.S. Raju in arranging district level data for some aspects for the states
of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka is duly acknowledged. Several people
cooperated in getting required data for the study. We are grateful to all
of them. The final setting of the material in the document was done by
Ms. Umeeta Ahuja.
We would like to place on record our thanks to ICAR for the financial
support provided for the study as a part of the National Professor Project.
We gratefully acknowledge support received from NCAP in various
forms.
Authors
... ix ...
1
Introduction
ndian agriculture is known for its diversity which is mainly the result of
variations in resource endowments, climate, topography and historical,
institutional and socio economic factors. Policies followed in the country
and nature of technology that became available over time have reinforced
some of the variations resulting from natural factors. As a consequence,
production performance of agriculture sector has followed an uneven
path and large gaps have developed in productivity between different
geographic locations across the country.
These regional variations have remained a subject of concern for
couple of reasons. Large variation in productivity leads to regional
disparities and is generally considered as discriminatory. It is against
the democratic polity to leave some regions behind other in making
economic progress. Identification of various levels of productivity helps
to analyse the reasons for variation in performance and in developing
location specific strategies for future growth and development.
Variation in productivity also indicates scope to raise production and
attain growth.
The variations in agriculture performance and productivity in India have
been studied mostly at the state level, although a few districtlevel studies
also exist. States are the appropriate administrative unit to study regional
variations in many aspects. However, agriculture performance generally
differs widely within state due to varying regional characteristics in
terms of resource endowments and climate. Therefore, need for lower
administrative unit becomes apparent. Recognising the importance of
district level approach for agriculture development Planning Commission
has asked the states to prepare district level plan for agriculture to get
funding for development of agriculture sector during XI Plan.
... 1 ...
Regional Variations in Agricultural Productivity A District Level Study
The first district wise analysis of performance of agriculture covering

whole country was attempted by Bhalla and Alagh (1979). This was a
pioneering work which not only prepared estimates of productivity but
also provided detailed analysis of agriculture growth at disaggregate level
of crops.This analysis covered the period upto 1970-73.The second major
attempt on district level analysis of agricultural productivity at national
level was made by Bhalla and Singh (2001) which extends to early 1990s.
District level estimates of productivity were also prepared and published
by Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy for some years in their
publication on Profiles of District. The last estimates of districtwise
value of output from CMIE are available for year 1995 (CMIE 2000). Lot
of changes have been experienced in Indian agriculture after early 1990s.
These changes have influenced different parts of the country in different
ways (Chand et. al. 2007). Second, a large number of new districts have
been carved out by reorganising the existing districts after early 1990s.
This has changed geographic boundaries of many district beside creating
new administrative unit. No study is seen in the literature that provides
estimates of agricultural productivity for the recent years at district level
for whole of the country. This paper is an attempt to fill this gap. The
main purpose of this study was to develop a database on value of crop
output and productivity per unit of land and per worker at district level
which can be used by the policymakers, and planners to develop strategy
for agricultural growth and for development of low productivity region.
The paper prepares estimates of value of crop output for 551 rural districts
in the country by using data and information for the year 2003-04 and
2004-05. This was used to prepare district wise estimates of agricultural
productivity per unit of land and per worker in agriculture. Alongwith
the estimates of value of crop output per hectare area the paper also
provides information on fertiliser use, irrigation, crop intensity, normal
rainfall, and some demographic features of each of the district in the
country. Efforts have also been made to analyse the factors that explain
inter district variation in crop productivity in the country. The paper
classifies districts according to levels of productivity and based on some
other typologies.
... 2 ...
Ramesh Chand, Sanjeev Garg and Lalmani Pandey
Rest of the paper is organised into four Chapters. The second chapter
discusses about the coverage of crops, sources and type of data and
methodology used in the paper. The third chapter classifies districts of
whole of India in different productivity classes, and map productivity with
other characteristics. State wise productivity profile of various districts is
discussed in Chapter 4. Conclusions are presented in Chapter 5.
... 3 ...
2
Data and Methodology
he data for this study was taken from secondary sources. Data
on crop wise area and production, land use statistics, rainfall,
irrigation, fertiliser use was taken from Statistical Abstracts of each
State. Those states for which Statistical Abstracts were not available
the data was noted down from other official publication or official
records available with state level offices of Economic/Statistical
Adviser, Directorate of Agriculture/Horticulture. Some of the data
on area and production was also taken from Agriculture Production
Commissioner, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India and
data on fertiliser use for some of the districts was taken from Fertiliser
Statistics, Fertiliser Association of India, New Delhi. All data on area,
production, fertiliser use, and irrigation refer to year 2003-04 and
2004-05. Instead of taking the average of three years we prefer to
take average of two years, since a good year and a bad year generally
follow each other. Two years average even out effect of good or bad
year more effectively than three years, average.
Physical output was converted into value term by using state level
implicit prices of various agricultural crops. These prices were generated
by dividing state level value of output of each crop estimated by CSO by
the output of the crop for the year 2003-04 and 2004-05. According to
CSO methodology such prices represent farm gate prices.
Value of crop output for crops considered in the study was multiplied by
ratio of GCAt/GCAc where GCAt is the reported gross cropped area
and GCAc is the sum of area under the crops considered in the study
to arrive at estimate of VCO for GCAt. This figure was then divided
by NSA to arrive at per hectare productivity. The advantages of taking
... 4 ...
productivity per hectare of net sown area instead of gross cropped area
is that NSA also includes effect of crop intensity on productivity and
provides estimate of productivity based on the output for the whole year.
Thus, output/ha of net sown area refers to output/ha/year.
Alongwith the estimate of per hectare productivity, the paper also
provides information on other relevant aspects at district level. This
includes estimate of productivity per worker, fertiliser use per hectare of
net sown area, average/normal rainfall, crop intensity, share of fruits and
vegetables in the total cropped area, area under irrigation, and percent of
rural population under poverty.
Data on fertiliser was taken from Fertilisers Statistics published by
Fertiliser Association of India. Data on irrigation was taken from state
level publications of the respective states or noted down from the official
records. Information on rainfall was collected from several sources and it
generally refers to normal rainfall in a district. Most of the states provide
this information in their publication. For the other states this data was
taken either from district level statistical data compiled by ICRISAT,
Hyderabad. In some cases average rainfall for the recent five years
was taken either from state level publication or from the net from the
official sites. District level data on poverty was taken from the paper by
Choudhury and Gupta (2009).
It was hypothesized that agricultural productivity in a district depends
upon level of fertiliser, irrigation intensity, area under fruits and vegetables
(high value crops) and level of rainfall. It was further hypothesized that
agriculture productivity is a significant factor in reducing rural poverty.
As agriculture income per person is affected by both productivity as
well as number of persons dependent on same size of land or conversely
land available per person, therefore poverty was also hypothesized to be
affected while number of worker per hectare of net sown area. These
affects were estimated by using a simultaneous equation model consisting
of following two equations:
... 5 ...
2.1 The Model :

Rural poverty % = (Productivity/ha. NSA, No of agricultural workers/
Ha. of NSA) .......(1)
Productivity/Ha NSA = (Fertiliser use/Ha NSA, Net irrigated

area %, Rainfall, and share of fruit and

vegetable in total crop area)

......(2)
2.2 Data Limitations and Proxies
The paper covers almost all the districts in the country except the urban
districts where crop production and area is almost nil, and some districts
in the North East for which required data was not available. This way,
out of 618 districts in the country, 551 districts have been covered by the
study.
For a few districts net irrigated area and gross irrigated area for the year
2003-04 and 2004-05 was not available. In such cases area under irrigation
in the previous year, 2001-02, was used. Similarly, data on area under
fruits and vegetables crops for some districts was available only for the
aggregate and in some cases it was missing for the reference year. Further,
in some of the districts sum of areas under the crops considered in the
study was lower than gross cropped area figure for the district and in a
few districts area under crops considered in the study exceeded reported
figure for GCA of the district. This was taken care for preparing estimate
of productivity.
The districts of small states Sikkim (East Sikkim, North Sikkim, South
Sikkim and West Sikkim) and Tripura (Dhalai, North Tripura, South
Tripura and West Tripura) have not been included in the study because
of non-availability of data.The Union territories of Andaman & Nicobar,
Chandigarh, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman & Diu, Delhi (Central Delhi,
North Delhi, South Delhi, East Delhi, North-East Delhi, New Delhi,
North-West Delhi, South-West Delhi and West Delhi) and Lakshadweep
have been excluded for the same reason. Some other districts dropped
... 6 ...
due to non-availability of proper data due to the various reasons are:

Arunachal Pradesh (Dibang Valley, Kurung Kamey, Lower Dibang Valley,
Anjaw), Andra Pradesh (Hyderabad), Haryana (Punchkula, Mewat),
Himachal Pradesh (Lahul & Spithi, Kulu, Shimla), Jharkhand (Jamatra,
Latehar, Saraikela, Simdega), Karnataka (Banglore, Kodagu), Maharashtra
(Mumbai, Mumbai Suburban , Gondia), Meghalaya (West Kashi Hills),
Mizoram (Lawngtlai, Serchip), Orissa (Balasore), Pondicherry (Karaikal,
Mahe, Pondicherry), Tamil Nadu (The Nilgiri, Chennai), West Bengal
(24 Paragans (south), Nadia).
Data on NIA or GIA for the year 2003-04 and 2004-05 was not available
for some of the districts of a few states like Andhra Pradesh, Haryana,
Kerala, Maharashtra, Manipur, Orissa, Punjab and West Bengal. This
missing data was taken from the previous available years data for these
states.
There were serious deficiencies in the data on area and production of
different fruits and vegetables. In some of the such cases the data for the
immediate preceding year was used.
Crops included in the study for estimating productivity includes:
1. Rice
2. Wheat
3. Jowar
4. Bajra
5. Barley
6. Maize
7. Ragi
8. SM & O. Cereals
9. Gram
10. Arhar
11. Urad
12. Moong
13. Masoor
14. Horsegram
15. Groundnut
16. Sesamum
17. Rape seed & Mustard
18. Linseed
19. Castor
20. Coconut
21. Safflower
22. Nigerseed
23. Soyabean
24. Sunflower
25. Sugarcane
26. Cotton
27. Jute
... 7 ...
28. Sanhemp
29. Mesta
30. Tobacco
31. Cardamom
32. Dry Chillies
33. Black Pepper
34. Dry Ginger
35. Turmeric
36. Arecanut
37. Garlic
38. Coriander
39. Banana
40. Potato
41. Spotato
42. Tapioca
43. Onion
44. Fruits & Vegetables
45. Guarseed
... 8 ...
3
Variations in Agricultural Productivity
er hectare productivity during 2003-04 and 2004-05 (2003-05)

across 551 districts of the country covered under the study range
from less than Rs. 3 thousand in Barmer district of Rajasthan to more
than Rs. 1.5 lakh in Lahaul Spiti district of Himachal Pradesh. In
the plain region of the country highest productivity was recorded in
Howrah district where one hectare of area under cultivation produced
crop output worth Rs. 1.14 lakh. Crop productivity per unit of net
sown area in some of the the most productive district in India was
more than 30 times the productivity in some of the district having low
productivity.
In order to see the distribution of districts in different productivity ranges
all the districts were classified according to two types of classification. The
first classification is based on a large number of categories representing
a productivity range of Rs. 5000 per hectare. Frequency distribution
of districts based on this classification is presented in Fig. 1 and Table
1. The second classification is much broader and it contains only five
categories.
The distribution based on class interval of Rs. 5000 per hectare includes
21 productivity classes. The bottom category includes districts having
productivity below Rs. 5000 and the top category includes districts
having productivity more than Rs. 1 lakh during 2003-04 and 200405 at current prices. It can be seen from Fig. 1 that concentration of
districts in low productivity categories is much higher than that in the
top categories. Highest number of districts falls in the productivity range
of Rs. 25000-30000 per hectare NSA.
... 9 ...
Fig. 1: Frequency distribution of districts according to different productivity

ranges
Table 1 provides information on number of districts in different

productivity categories alongwith distribution of net sown area and share
in value of crop output in those categories. Per hectare productivity
was below Rs. 5000 in three districts in the country. About five percent
districts recorded productivity below Rs. 10,000 and same percent of
districts recorded per hectare productivity above Rs. 70 thousand. Five
percent districts at the bottom level of the productivity account for
10.4 percent of total area of the country but contributes only 2.7 percent
of crop output. In contrast to this top 5 percent (27) districts at the top
contribute 10 percent of the total crop output from all the districts while
accounting for 3.38 percent of net sown area. Low productivity districts
are generally found to be larger in area compare to the high productivity
districts which are generally of relatively smaller size. About 62 percent
of the districts of the country fall in productivity range of Rs. 10 to 35
thousand. Whole three districts in the country has productivity below
Rs. 5 thousand there were such four districts which have productivity
more than Rs. 1 lakh.
... 10 ...
This distribution shows that crop productivity per hectare of area differs
very widely across districts. Complete set of data on productivity level
in each district arranged in ascending order of productivity along with
other relevant variables is presented in Annex I. Productivity and other
characteristics for various districts in each state arranged alphabetically is
given in Annex II.
Table 1: Distribution of districts in different productivity classes
Productivity
ranges
No. of Cumulative Share

districts
% of
in NSA
districts
<5
0.54
Cumulative
share in
NSA
Share in
VCO
Cumulative
share in
VCO
2.28
2.28
0.29
0.29
5-10
24
4.90
8.14
10.43
2.42
2.71
10-15
57
15.25
14.05
24.48
6.34
9.06
15-20
60
26.13
11.46
35.94
6.90
15.96
20-25
80
40.65
14.95
50.89
11.69
27.65
25-30
83
55.72
13.24
64.13
12.52
40.17
30-35
60
66.61
9.14
73.27
10.37
50.54
35-40
32
72.41
4.83
78.10
6.26
56.80
40-45
35
78.77
4.39
82.49
6.52
63.32
45-50
21
82.58
3.81
86.30
6.27
69.59
50-55
29
87.84
4.18
90.49
7.73
77.32
55-60
12
90.02
1.72
92.21
3.48
80.80
60-65
17
93.10
2.74
94.95
5.91
86.71
65-70
11
95.10
1.67
96.62
3.93
90.64
70-75
96.19
1.28
97.91
3.25
93.89
75-80
97.82
1.04
98.94
2.76
96.65
80-85
98.37
0.33
99.27
0.93
97.58
85-90
98.73
0.50
99.77
1.55
99.12
90-95
98.73
0.00
99.77
0.00
99.12
95-100
99.27
0.09
99.86
0.30
99.42
>100
100.00
0.14
100.00
0.58
100.00
All
551
100.00
... 11 ...
100.00
Distribution in Broad Categories

In this classification all the districts were categorised into five
productivity levels viz., very low, low, average, high and very high.
Average productivity includes all those districts with productivity in
the range of mean + 0.25 standard deviation in productivity. The next
two lower classes were formed by taking the range as bottom of the
average productivity less 0.5 and 1.0 times the standard deviation.
High and very high categories were selected by 1.0 and 2.0 times the
standard deviation to the upper limit of average productivity range
(Table 2). According to this distribution 120 districts in the country
have very low productivity (below Rs. 18199) and 161 districts have
low productivity (between Rs. 18199 to 27955). On the other hand
105 districts fall in productivity range of Rs. 37712 to Rs. 57225 and
63 districts were having per hectare productivity more than Rs. 57.2
thousand. Frequency distribution of districts according to productivity
status is also shown in Fig. 2.
Table 2: Distribution of districts in broad productivity categories
Productivity
category
Range
(Rs/ha NSA)
No. of
districts
Share in
NSA %
Share in
VCO %
Very Low
< 18199
120
31.46
13.00
Low
18199 - 27955
161
28.38
22.86
Average
27955 - 37712
102
15.86
17.71
High
37712 - 57225
105
15.06
24.28
Very High
> 57225
63
9.24
22.15
Overall
32834
551
100.00
100.00
Districts in low productivity category account for 31.5 percent of net

sown area of all the districts but they contribute only 13 percent of the
value of crop output. In contrast to this very high productivity districts
accounts for less than one third of the area under low productivity
districts but contribute 70 percent more output than low productivity
districts.
... 12 ...
Fig. 2 : Distribution of districts in different productivity ranges
Simple average for all the 551 districts show that one hectare of land
under cultivation in the country generated crop output of Rs. 32834
during 2003-05. Weighted average of productivity, when net sown
area was used as a weight, turned out to be Rs. 28812. The standard
deviation in productivity was Rs. 19513 and coefficient of variation
was 59.4%. Out of 551 districts included in the study, 130 districts that
came into the average category, covers 18.91 per cent area of total area
under cultivation and contributes 20.6 percent output. Low and very
low productivity districts account for 56 percent area but contributes
one third of crop output in the country. In contrast to this, 164 districts
in top two categories contributed 47 percent of output with area share
of 24.7 percent.
... 13 ...
Factors Affecting Productivity

Productivity of crop sector per unit of area and per worker is affected by
several factors. We have attempted to identify some factors which are
considered as the most important. Initially, we examine through tabular
analysis pattern of productivity per unit area and per worker and factors
like rainfall, levels of irrigation, fertiliser use and diversification towards
high value horticultural crops. The Table also presents information on
cropping intensity which matters for productivity but which itself is
affected by rainfall and irrigation.
It is interesting to observe from Table 3 that crop productivity per
agriculture worker in different categories closely follow land productivity
though variation in land productivity is found to be somewhat higher than
productivity of labour. Another interesting feature of land productivity is
that it very closely follows variation in per hectare fertiliser use. Irrigation
coverage and crop intensity also show increase with the increase in
productivity. Area allocated to fruits and vegetables also show positive
association with per hectare value of crop output.
In the bottom category of productivity, per hectare fertiliser use was
537 kg, area under irrigation was 24 percent and crop intensity was 122
percent. In the average productivity category fertiliser use increased to
101 kg, irrigation coverage increased to 146 percent and 34 percent area
was sown more than once. Area allocated to fruit and vegetable increased
from 2.3 per cent to 5.7 percent as one moves from very low productivity
districts to low productivity districts. Land productivity between average
and bottom category show ratio of 1: 2.49 while labour productivity
show a ratio of 1: 1.65. Ratio of fertiliser application between the two
category was 1: 2.33. Land productivity in top category was 128 percent
higher than the average category. Whereas, labour productivity in top
category was 250 percent higher than the average category. These result
shows that per hectare labour use increase faster than increase in land
productivity as we move from very low productivity districts to average
productivity districts. However, as we move from average productivity
... 14 ...
districts to high productivity districts use of labour follow lower increase

than increase in land productivity.
Table 3: Productivity levels and characteristics for different categories of
productivity
Productivity
category
Very Low
Productivity
/ha NSA
(Rs)
12910
Fertiliser
Use/ ha
NSA
(Kg)
53
Productivity/
Ag.
Worker
(Rs.)
9852
Net
irrigated
area
(%)
24
Rain- No. of
fall
Ag.
(mm) Worker/
Km2
NSA
935
161
Area Cropping Rural

under Intensity poor
fruit
(%)
%
&
vegetable
%
2.3
122
36
Low
23442
101
14053
46
1189
215
5.7
134
31
Average
32192
124
16278
50
1224
246
9.2
140
29
High
46360
193
26837
58
1212
254
12.9
150
23
Very High
73284
259
56679
64
1507
181
17.3
164
18
Average of
the districts
32834
132
20964
46
1193
213
8.5
139
29
Districts having very low productivity receives lowest rainfall (93.5

cm per year), whereas, districts having very high productivity receives
highest rainfall (150.7 cm per year). Rainfall did not show clear pattern
in the middle categories. For instance districts with average per hectare
productivity of Rs. 32191 receive normal rainfall of 122 cm compared
to 121 cm in high productivity districts having average productivity of
Rs. 46360. The reason for high productivity despite lower rainfall seems
to be due to irrigation. As can be seen from the Table 3, effect of irrigation
dominated small variation in rainfall. Eventhough, the districts in high
category get lower rainfall than the districts in average productivity
category but irrigation coverage in latter is 15 percent higher than the
former, which explains variation in productivity.
A very strong pattern is observed between land productivity and poverty
across productivity classes. More than one third of rural population is under
poverty in 120 districts of the country which have very low agriculture
productivity. On the other end, less than one fifth of rural population
suffered from poverty in the districts having very high agricultural
... 15 ...
productivity. Within these two extremes, productivity showed decline

with increase in crop productivity.
Finally, the variation caused by various factors in the productivity of
the districts of India and the effect of agricultural productivity and
concentration of workforce in agriculture on the rural poverty at district
level was estimated using a simultaneous equation econometric model
described in the Chapter 2 on methodology.
Effect of Various Factors on Productivity and Poverty
Effect of various factors on per hectare productivity of crop sector and
on poverty was estimated by using two stage simultaneous equation
model. All the variables were defined in log form. As agro-climatic
factors in mountain areas differed significantly from the plains, it was
thought proper to exclude mountain states and districts from the set
of data used in regression analysis. Another reason for excluding these
districts was that many of them were outliers in terms of productivity
or some other factors and their size happened to be very small. For
instance some of the districts in Himachal Pradesh and Jammu and
Kashmir have less than 10 thousand net sown area. A small unit having
extreme value of some of the variable was likely to effect reliability of
the estimate of regression analysis. Therefore, all the districts in Western
Himalayan region and all the districts in north east except Assam were
excluded from the set of data used in the regression analysis. District
Darjeeling of West Bengal and Nilgiri district in Tamil Nadu were also
excluded from the data set. The estimated equation consider only those
districts for which complete information on all the variables included
in the model was available.
The estimates of the econometric model are presented in Table 4 and
the elasticity estimates of per hectare productivity and rural poverty with
respect to various factors are presented in Table 5. As can be seen from
Table 4. R2 for both the equations was highly significant and all the
variables included in the estimated equation were also significant at 0.2
or lower level of significance.
... 16 ...
Table 4: Estimates of simultaneous equation model on effect of various

factors on productivity and rural poverty
Estimation Method: Two-Stage Least Squares
Date: 08/29/09 Time: 11:58
Sample: 1 to 472
Included observations: 388
Total system (unbalanced) observations 773
Coefficient
Std. Error
t-Statistic
Prob.
C(1) Intercept eq 1
9.390203
0.977908
9.602342
0.0000
C(2) Per hectare

productivity
-0.649235
0.096690
-6.714583
0.0000
C(3) Number of
workers / hectare
0.571621
0.086110
6.638254
0.0000
C(11) Intercept eq 2
7.535282
0.320741
23.49332
0.0000
C(12) Fertiliser
0.323808
0.028716
11.27639
0.0000
C(13) Area under

fruits and veg
0.179189
0.015913
11.26066
0.0000
C(14) Irrigation
0.066936
0.029215
2.291164
0.0222
C(15) Rainfall
0.104101
0.042607
2.443293
0.0148
Determinant residual covariance
0.089791
Equation: RUPOORPER = C(1) +C(2)*VCOPH +C(3)*WRKRPERHA

Instruments: FERTPH FRUITVEGPER NIAPER RAIN WRKRPERHA C
Observations: 385
R-squared
0.168330
Mean dependent var
3.039948
Adjusted R-squared
0.163975
S.D. dependent var
0.944329
S.E. of regression
0.863442
Sum squared resid
284.7931
Durbin-Watson stat
1.494649
Equation:VCOPH = C(11) +C(12)*FERTPH+C(13)*FRUITVEGPER+C(14)

*NIAPER+C(15)*RAIN
Instruments: FERTPH FRUITVEGPER NIAPER RAIN WRKRPERHA C
Observations: 388
R-squared
0.632217
Mean dependent var
10.20684
Adjusted R-squared
0.628376
S.D. dependent var
0.578497
S.E. of regression
0.352657
Sum squared resid
47.63267
... 17 ...
Elasticity estimates presented in Table. 5 show that a 1 percent increase/

decrease in per hectare productivity across the selected districts result in
0.65 percent decline/rise in percent of rural population under poverty. On
the other hand a 1 percent increase in pressure of work force on agriculture
land resulted in 0.57 percent increase in rural poverty. These results show
that increase in agricultural productivity and shift of work force from
agriculture to other sector are very strong determinant of rural poverty.
Among various factors, per hectare use of fertiliser showed strongest affect
on per hectare productivity. A 1 percent increase/decrease in fertiliser use
results in 0.32 percent increase/decrease in per hectare productivity. Area
under fruits and vegetable turned out to be the second most important
factor in causing variation in productivity across districts. Elasticity of
per hectare productivity with respect to area under fruit and vegetable
was 0.18. Affect of rainfall variation on per hectare productivity of crop
sector turned out to be stronger than the affect of net irrigated area.While
1 percent variation in rainfall cause 0.104 percent variation in productivity
in the same direction the affect of 1 percent variation in net irrigated area
(percent) was 0.067. These estimates show that variation in availability
of water either through irrigation or through rainfall cause significant
variation in district level productivity of agriculture. However, fertiliser and
diversification towards high value crops caused much stronger influence on
productivity.
Table 5: Estimate of elasticity of per hectare productivity and rural poverty
with respect to various factors based on district level data excluding
mountain districts, 2003-04 and 2004-05
Elasticity of rural poverty
Elasticity of per hectare productivity
Variable
Coefficient
Variable
Per hectare productivity
-0.6492
Per hectare fertiliser
Agriculture worker/ ha
0.5716
Area under
vegetable
fruits
Coefficient
0.3238
and
0.1792
Net irrigated area
0.0669
Rainfall
0.1041
... 18 ...
4
State Level Analysis of District Wise
Productivity
here is considerable variation in productivity level of various districts

within a state. Even in relatively smaller states like Haryana which
has high productivity there are pockets of districts with low productivity.
Distribution of districts according to productivity status for each state is
presented in Table 6. State wise list of districts in different productivity
categories is given in Annex III.
Out of 22 districts in Andhra Pradesh productivity was high in two
districts and the same no of districts show very low productivity.
About one third districts in this state show low or very low
productivity that is less than Rs. 27995 per hectare. All the twelve
districts in Arunachal Pradesh for which estimates could be prepared
have average or lower than average productivity. Sixty percent of the
districts in Assam come in the low productivity category. Only one
district out of twenty three in this state records high productivity.
No district in Assam show very low productivity. Two districts out
of thirty seven in Bihar comes in very low category and about half
are in the low productivity category. Seven districts in Bihar state
harvested crop output of more than Rs. 37 thousand during the year
2003-04 and 2004-05.
All the sixteen districts in Chattisgarh come in the category of
below average productivity with 81percent showing very low and
19 percent showing low productivity. Gujarat has a mix of all kind of
districts with varying productivity. Out of twenty five, five districts
... 19 ...
Table 6: Distribution
productivity
of
States
Very
low
<18199
districts
in
different
States
according
to
Categories of productivity: Rs. / ha NSA

Low
Average High
Very
Overall
18199 27955 - 37712 - High
27955
37712
57225 >57225
Andhra Pradesh
22
Arunachal Pradesh
12
Assam
16
23
Bihar
18
10
37
13
16
Gujarat
25
Haryana
19
Himachal Pradesh
12
Jammu & Kashmir
14
Jharkhand
22
Karnataka
26
Kerala
10
14
Madhya Pradesh
26
20
48
Maharashtra
16
31
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
10
10
10
30
Punjab
11
17
19
11
32
Tamil Nadu
15
29
Uttar Pradesh
21
18
19
70
Uttarakhand
13
West Bengal
14
18
120
161
102
105
63
551
Chhattisgarh
Rajasthan
Overall
... 20 ...
show very low and one district show very high productivity. Thirty
percent districts each come in low and average productivity ranges
in Gujarat.
In Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra majority of the districts have per
hectare productivity below Rs. 18199. Except two cases all other districts
in Madhya Pradesh have either low or very low productivity. Not even
a single district in the se two states come in very high productivity
range.
In Haryana, more than one fourth districts have very high and more
than half have high productivity. Only one district out of 19 comes
in low productivity category. All the districts in Himachal Pradesh
has above average productivity with 50 percent districts in very high
productivity category. In contrast to this, majority of the districts in
Jammu and Kashmir and Uttarakhand have average or low productivity.
Majority of the districts in Jharkhand for which the estimates could
be prepared were classified in low or average category. In Orissa,
one third districts each come in low, average and high productivity
categories.
Like Arunanchal Pradesh, distribution of districts was concentrated in
low and very low categories in Meghalaya, Mizoram and Nagaland.
In Southern India, majority of districts in Karnataka have very low or
low productivity. Compared to this, 50 percent districts in Tamil Nadu
and all the districts in Kerala have either high or very high productivity.
Like Kerala all districts in Punjab comes in high or very high productivity
and more than two third districts in each of these states come in very
high productivity category.
Highest percent of districts in very high productivity category was found
in West Bengal. Here, 14 out of 18, i.e. is about 77 percent, districts harvest
more than Rs. 57 thousand per hectare of net sown area during 2003-05.
... 21 ...
Uttar Pradesh presented a mix picture with some concentration towards

above average productivity.
District wise productivity in each of the state in the country is presented
in Figures 3 to 26 and is briefly discussed below.
Jammu & Kashmir
Except district Srinagar productivity in all other districts in the states was
either low or medium. Per hectare productivity in Srinagar was close to
Rs. 76 thousand per hectare which was almost double the productivity
in the district which ranked second. Lowest productivity was reported
for Kargil district where one hectare of land generated output worth
Rs. 8473 only.
Fig. 3:
Districtwise agricultural productivity in Jammu & Kashmir : Rs./

ha NSA
... 22 ...
Himachal Pradesh
Productivity level in various districts of Himachal Pradesh ranges between
Rs. 33 thousand to Rs. 1.5 lakh. 3 districts in this mountain state record
per hectare productivity more than Rs. 1 lakh. These are Kulu, Shimla
and Lahaul and Spiti. Productivity level in Sirmaur, Solan and Kinnaur,
varied between Rs. 78 to 97 thousand. These are the districts located in
mid to high altitude and are known for diversification towards fruit and
off season vegetables which fetches higher prices. Productivity in the
remaining six districts of the states was below Rs. 54 thousand. Districts
having large area in low hills like Una, Hamirpur and Chamba show low
productivity.
Fig. 4: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Himachal Pradesh : Rs./ha
NSA
Punjab
Punjab is agriculturally most progressive state of India. The green
revolution technology has seen its highest adoption in this state. The
difference between highest and lowest productivity district was less than
... 23 ...
60 percent. Three districts which are located in sub mountain zone and
district Amritsar show productivity less than Rs. 50 thousand. District
Ropar (Rupnagar) comes at the bottom with productivity level of
Rs. 44.6 thousand and Ludhiana comes at the top with productivity
exceeding Rs. 69 thousand.
Fig. 5: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Punjab : Rs./ha NSA
Haryana
Sates of Haryana and Punjab are located in fertile plains of north-west
India and having assured source of irrigation. Districtwise agriculture
productivity in Haryana ranges from Rs. 26.5 to 69.2 thousand.
Kurkshetra comes at the top and Riwari at the bottom. Various districts
of Haryana can be clearly divided into 3 categories of productivity.
Riwari, Jhajer, Mahendra garh, Bhiwani, Rohtak and Gurgaon are
relatively low productivity districts whereas Fatehbad, Panipat, Yamuna
Nagar, Karnal and Kurkshetra are relatively high productivity districts.
... 24 ...
Hissar, Jind, Panchkula, Fridabad, Kithal, Sonepat, Ambala and Sirsa come
in the middle.
Fig. 6: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Haryana : Rs./ha NSA
Uttarakhand
Haridwar was found to be the most productive district of Uttarakhand with
per hectare value of crop output above Rs. 60 thousand. Pauri Garhwal comes
at the bottom with productivity less than Rs. 17.5 thousand. Udhamsingh
Nagar and Nainital are among high productivity districts along with Haridwar.
Productivity level in Tehri Garhwal was below Rs. 22.1 thousand and it
comes second from the bottom. Though Uttarakhand has similar climate
and agro ecological conditions as in the state of Himachal Pradesh but it lags
far behind in productivity compare to Himachal Pradesh.
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh is a very large state and it has largest number of districts among
any state in the country. District wise productivity for seventy districts
in the state is shown in Fig. 8. Sonbhudra came at the bottom with per
hectare productivity of Rs. 14.6 thousand while Meerut comes at the top
with productivity exceeding Rs. 81 thousand. Beside sonbhudra per hectare
... 25 ...
Fig. 7: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Uttarakhand : Rs./ha NSA
productivity was below Rs. 16.5 thousand in Chitrakut, Mahoba, Banda and
Hamirpur. On the other hand per hectare productivity was found above
Rs. 77 thousand in Muzaffarnagar and Baghpat beside district Meerut. In
general productivity declines as one moves from western part towards the
eastern part. The whole state is divided into five different regions as under:
List of districts in different regions of Uttar Pradesh
Region
Western Region
Districts
Agra, Mainpuri, Firozabad, Aligarh, Bareilly, Badaun,
Bulandshahr, Etah, Etawah, Farrukhabad, Mathura, Meerut,
Ghaziabad, Muradabad, Pilibhit, Rampur, Muzaffarnagar,
Saharanpur, Bijanor, Shahjahanpur, Bagpath, Gautam Buddha
Nagar, Hathras, J.B. Phule Nagar, Kannauj, Auraiya.
Central Region
Barabanki, Fatehpur, Hardoi, Kanpur, Khiri, Lucknow, Rai
Bareli, Sitapur, Unnao
Eastern Region
Allahabad, Kaushambi, Azamgarh, Maunath Bhanjan, Ballia,
Bahraich, Basti, Siddharthnagar, Deoria, Faizabad, Gazipur,
Gonda, Gorakhpur, Maharajganj, Jaunpur, Mirzapur, Sonbhadra,
Pratapgarh, Sultanpur, Varanasi, Bhadoi, Balarampur, Shravasti,
Chandauli, Sant Ravi Das Nagar, Kushingar, Sant Kabir Nagar,
Ambedkar Nagar
Bundelkhand Region Jhansi, Jalaun, Hamirpur, Mohaba, Banda, Chitrakut, Lalitpur
... 26 ...
Fig. 8: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Uttar Pradesh : Rs./ha NSA
... 27 ...
Bihar
The agricultural productivity level in various districts in Bihar ranges from
Rs. 16,776 to Rs. 55,682 per hecatre. Lowest productivity is recorded
in Lakhisarai which harvested crop output worth Rs. 16,776 from one
hectare area during 2003-04 and 2004-05.Vaishali figures at the top with
productivity level close to Rs. 56 thousand per hectare followed by Sivhar
with productivity level close to Rs. 53 thousand. Maximum number of
districts fall in the productivity range of Rs. 20-30 thousand. Saharsa,
Muzafarpur, Begusarai, Madhepura and Vaishali, obtained productivity
level above Rs. 40 thousand per hectare NSA. The districts having
productivity level higher than 30 thousand are mainly situated in the rich
fertile plains of river Ganga, Kosi and Gandak. So, they have some natural
advantage over some south Bihar districts like Lakhisarai, Jamui, Gaya etc.
which show low productivity.
Fig. 9: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Bihar : Rs./ha NSA
... 28 ...
Jharkhand
Per hectare productivity across various districts show range of Rs. 13 to
Rs. 63 thousand, represented by Gumla at the bottom and Koderma at
the top. There was a big difference in the productivity among four top
districts namelu Giridih, Dhanbad, Bokaro and Koderma. Three districts
in this state namely Gumla, Simdega and Saraikala have per hectare
productivity below 19 thousand. 16 district in the state show fall in the
productivity range of Rs. 24 to Rs. 40 thousand.
Fig. 10: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Jharkhand : Rs./ha NSA
Orissa
Productivity level across various districts did not show large variation.The
ratio of productivity in lowest and highest districts was 1 : 2.5. Buragarh
district comes at the bottom with productivity close to Rs. 21 thousand
and Phulbani comes at the top with productivity level of Rs. 53.5
thousand. Other districts with productivity more than Rs. 50 thousand
... 29 ...
per hectare are Jagatsinghpur and Puri. Beside Buragarh producitivity was
below Rs. 25 thousand in Bolangir, Nawrangpur, Nawapara, Sundergarh,
Kalahandi and Mayurbhanj.
Fig. 11: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Orissa : Rs./ha NSA
West Bengal
West Bengal is situated in fertile plains of river Ganga. It is agriculturally
one of the most developed states of India. Out of eighteen districts
for which productivity was estimated seven districts have productivity
higher than Rs. 76 thousand. Some of the districts like Howrah, Nadia,
Murshidabad, and Darjeeling are among the top productivity districts
in the country. Lowest productivity was recorded in Purulia where one
hectare of net sown area provided crop output worth Rs. 35 thousand
at farm gate price. The next district from the bottom i.e. Midnapur
West has productivity more than 50 thousand. In other words except
Purulia all districts in West Bengal has per hectare productivity above
... 30 ...
Rs. 51 thousand. Howrah district was found to have highest productivity

in the country among all the districts in the plains.
NSA
West Bengal : Rs./ha
Assam
Productivity level in different districts of Assam did not show large
variation.Value of crop output per hectare was close to Rs. 20 thousand
in district Morigon and Dhemaji. North Cachar Hills came at the top
with per hectare productivity of Rs. 43.7 thousand. Hailakandi ranked
second though its productivity was much lower than North Cachar Hills
district.
Rajasthan
Rajasthan shows extreme variation in productivity with a ratio of 1 : 11
between lowest and highest productivity district. Districts like Barmer,
Jaisalmar and Churu located in Thar desert are among the lowest
productivity districts of the country. Extreme climate and soil type are
the main factors for low productivity in these districts. One hectare of
... 31 ...
Fig. 13: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Assam : Rs./ha NSA
land was found to generate crop output of value less then Rs. 5 thousand.
Productivity was more than Rs. 31 thousand in districts Baran and Kota.
Fig. 14: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Rajasthan : Rs./ha NSA
... 32 ...
Gujarat
Gujarat, the productivity level ranges from Rs. 11.5 thousand to 62.4
thousand per hectare of NSA. Surat comes at the top and Punch Mahal
comes at the bottom. Most of the districts fall in productivity range
of Rs. 10-20 thousand. Besides Surat productivity level was more than
Rs. 50 thousand in Anand and Navasari. Junagarh is at fourth place from
the top with productivity level of Rs. 44.4 thousand per hectare.
Fig. 15: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Gujarat : Rs./ha NSA
Maharashtra
Jalgaon was found to be the most productive district in the state of
Maharashtra with per hectare crop output of Rs. 47.8 thousand. The
next districts are Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg with productivity level of
Rs. 46345 and Rs. 36378 per hectare of net sown area. A majority of the
districts in Maharashtra show productivity between Rs. 9-17 thousand.
... 33 ...
Osmanabad, Beed, and Nandurbar comes at the bottom with productivity

level below Rs. 10 thousand per hectare.
Fig. 16: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Maharashtra : Rs./ha NSA
Madhya Pradesh
Average level of productivity in Madhya Pradesh is low. Except Indore
and Burhanpur all other districts have productivity below Rs. 28 thousand
per hectare. Burhanpur is different from all the districts with productivity
recorded at Rs. 40,8000 followed by Indore which recorded per hectare
productivity 33077. A majority of the districts come in productivity
range of Rs. 10-20 thousand per hectare of NSA.The lowest productivity
level was recorded in Anuppur (Rs, 6,491) per hectare of NSA; next to
that are Umaria, Dindori, Shahdol. The productivity level of 8 districts is
below 10 thousand Rs./ha NSA .
... 34 ...
Fig. 17: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Madhya Pradesh : Rs./ha

NSA
Chhattisgarh
All districts in this state show low level of productivity. Highest productivity
was only Rs. 26,627 in district Dhamtari. Relatively better placed
districts like Bilaspur and Durg show productivity level between Rs. 22
to 24 thousand. All the remaining districts have per hectare productivity
below Rs. 16.5 thousand. Level of productivity is below Rs. 10 thousand
in Dantewara district which is a plateau region.
Andhra Pradesh
Agricultural productivity in various districts of Andhra Pradesh ranges
from Rs. 15,000 to 65,000 per hecatre. District Mehboobnagar comes
at the bottom with per hectare productivity of Rs. 15,715. Highest
productivity was found in West Godavari district where one hectare of
net sown area produced crop output worth Rs. 64,600. The maximum
... 35 ...
Fig. 18:
Districtwise agricultural productivity in

NSA
Chhattisgarh : Rs./ha
number of districts fall in the productivity range of Rs. 20-40 thousand

per hecatra of NSA. Agricultural productivity in three districts- Guntur,
West Godavari and East Godavari- is much higher than the other districts
which is more than Rs. 54,000/ha, whereas the productivity level in
three districts- Mehaboobnagar, Anantapur and Adilabad falls below
Rs. 20,000.The highest productive districts are situated in the fertile land
of Andhra plains which have natural superiority over the plateau region
districts (three lowest productive districts) of Andhra Pradesh in terms of
productivity level.
... 36 ...
Fig. 19: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Andhra Pradesh: Rs./ha

NSA
Karnataka
The average agricultural productivity level in Karnataka show a much
wider range than Andhra Pradess. Coorg district comes at the top with
productivity of Rs. 73,239 per hectare of NSA followed by Dakshin
Kanada with productivity of 69.7 thousand. Bangalore, and Kolar
produced output worth about Rs. 53 thousand from one hectare area
during 2003-04 and 2004-05. Maximum number of districts comes in
the category of Rs. 10-30 thousand per hectare. Per hectare productivity
was below Rs. 10 thousand in Gadag and Bijapur.
... 37 ...
Fig. 20: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Karnataka : Rs./ha NSA
Tamil Nadu
The range of agricultural productivity in Tamil Nadu varies from
Rs. 11.3 to 98.7 thousand per hectare of NSA.The Nilgiri district seems
to have exceptionally high productivity estimated at Rs. 98.7 thousand.
Kanya Kumari comes second with per hectare productivity being about
2/3rd of that in the Nilgiris. District Ramanathpuram comes at the
bottom and quite far from the district which ranked second from the
bottom. In most of the districts level of productivity varies from 32 to
47 thousand.
Kerala
Kerala is among the high productivity states of India mainly due to high
share of plantation crops in the area under cultivation. Every district
has the productivity level of more than Rs. 46,000 per hectare. Lowest
productivity was recorded in Kannur district which was still higher than
the highest productivity district in some of the states. Except Kannur
... 38 ...

NSA
Tamil Nadu : Rs./ha
district productivity level was higher than Rs. 50 thousand in all the
districts.Wynad comes at the top with per hectare productivity exceeding
Rs. 82.6 thousand. Likewise, productivity was more that Rs. 70 thousand
in Trivendrum, Iduki, Pathanamthitta and Kollam.
Arunachal Pradesh
Out of 12 districts in Arunachal Pradesh per hectare productivity was
higher than Rs. 29 thousand in two districts and lower than Rs. 19
thousand in 9 districts. Tirap and West Siang come at the bottom with
productivity less than Rs. 10 thousand. On the other hand, Paumpere and
Lohit harvested crop output valued at more than Rs. 31 thousand from
one hectare area.
... 39 ...
Fig. 22: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Kerala : Rs./ha NSA
Fig. 23: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Arunachal Pradesh : Rs./

ha NSA
... 40 ...
Meghalaya
Per hecatre productivity in the six districts that comprise Meghalaya varies
between Rs. 17 to 46 thousand.The highest productivity was obtained in
district East Hasi Hill followed by Ri Bhoi district which has productivity
of 34.5 thousand. South Garo Hills comes at the bottom.
Fig. 24: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Meghalaya : Rs./ha NSA
Mizoram
Productivity level across districts shows minimum variation in Mizoram
among all the north east states. Per hectare productivity in the top ranking
district was less than 50 per cent higher than the district at the bottom.
Saiha turned out to have lowest productivity valued at Rs. 17 thousand
per hectare. Chimtuipui comes at the top with productivity level of
Rs. 23,443 per hectare of NSA.
Nagaland
Like the state of Mizoram, per hectare productivity in Nagaland also
shows small variation. Here Denapur is at the top with productivity level
... 41 ...
Fig. 25: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Mizoram : Rs./ha NSA
of Rs. 21,377 per hectare of NSA. Lowest productivity was recorded in

Mokokchun where all crops taken together were valued at Rs. 14,333
per hectare of NSA.
Fig. 26: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Nagaland : Rs./ha NSA
... 42 ...
5
Conclusions
here is a vast variation in productivity of crop sector across districts

in the country and in most of the states. This clearly calls for a
regionally differentiated strategy for future growth and development of
agriculture sector in the country. Cross classification of districts according
to their productivity levels and other characteristics presented in the
paper would help to understand the link between productivity and other
factors. The analysis highlights important features of those districts that
have been stuck in low productivity. These include 191 districts where
productivity is low and 66 districts where productivity is very low. In
general very low and low productivity districts were characterised by low
rainfall, low irrigated area which also results a lesser amount of fertiliser
use. Area under fruits and vegetables in these districts is also generally low.
Moreover total livestock density and total bovine density in these districts
was also found lower.
Fertiliser use, irrigation and rainfall were found to cause significant
variation in productivity across districts. The highest coefficient was that
of rainfall. Which shows that one percent increase in rainfall between
districts results in 0.43 percent increase in agriculture productivity.
Fertiliser comes next with elasticity coefficient of 0.277.This implies that
productivity increased by 0.27 percent in response to 1 percent increase
in use of fertiliser. Elasticity of productivity with respect to irrigation
across districts was 0.11. These results indicate the importance and
need to manage rainfall water to raise productivity particularly in low
productivity districts.
Another very interesting result from the cross section data of districts
was agricultural productivity is very powerful in reducing rural poverty.
A 1 percent increase in land productivity reduces poverty by as much
... 43 ...
as 0.51 percent. The effect of dependence of workers on agriculture

was reverse. A 1 percent reduction in labourforce in agriculture resulted
in 0.49 percent decline in rural poverty. This highlights the need for
reducing pressure on land by shifting labourforce from agriculture to non
farm activities.
Most of the districts that are in very low or low productivity range offers
immense opportunities for raising agricultural production in the country.
The study provides snapshot view of productivity regimes across whole
of the country which can be used effectively to delineate various districts
for effective and specific interventions.
... 44 ...
References
Chand, R. (1997). Agricultural Diversificaiton and Development
of Mountain Regions. New Delhi: M D Publications Private
Limited.
Chand, R. (1999). Agricultural Diversification in India : Potentials and
Prospects in Developed Region. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
Chand, R., Raju, S. S., & Pandey, L. M. (2007). Growth Crisis in Agriculture
: Severity and Options at National and State Levels. Economic and
Political Weekly, June 30 , 2528-2533.
Chaudhuri, S., & Gupta, N. (2009). Levels of Living and Poverty Patterns
: A district-wise Analysis from India. Economic & Political Weekly,
, XLIV NO. 9, 94-110. Feb 28.
CMIE. (1993). District Level Estimates. Mumbai, Maharashtra, India:
Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy Pvt Ltd.
CSO. (2008). Statewise Estimate of Value of Output from Agriculture and
Allied Activities with New Base Year 1999-2000 (1999-2000 to
2005-06). New Delhi: Central Statistical Organisation, Ministry of
Statistics and Programe Inplimenation, Government of India.
FAI. (2006). Fertiliser Statistics. New Delhi: The Fertiliser Association of
India.
G.S.Bhalla, & Alagh, Y. (1979). Performance of Indian Agriculture : A
Districtwise Study. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Pvt Ltd.
G.S.Bhalla, & Singh, G. (2001). Indian Agriculture : Four Decades of
Development. New Delhi: Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd.
GOI. (2007).Agricultural Statistics At A Glance. New Delhi: Directorate of
Economics & Statistics, Department fo Agricultural & Cooperation,
Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Krishi Bhavan.
... 45 ...
GOI. (2006). Basic Animal Husbandary Statistics. New Delhi: Department

of Animal Husbandary, Dairying & Fisheries, Minisry of Agriculture,
Government of India, Krishi Bhawan.
GOI. (2008). Economic Survey. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance,
Government of India.
GOI. (2008). Eleventh Five Year Plan 2007-12. New Delhi: Planning
Commission, Government of India.
GOI. (2006). Indian Horticulture Database. Gurgaon: National
Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of
India.
GOI. (2001). Populaiton Census. New Delhi: Census of India, Registrar
General & Census Commissioner, India.
IJAE. (1990). Agro Climatic Zonal Planning and Regional Development.
Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics , 244-297.
State Governments. (2004). Various Reports and Satistical Abstracts.
Various States Capitals: Department of Agriculture, Horticulture,
Animal Husbandary & Livestock, and Fishery.
State Governments. (2005). Various Reports and Statistical Abstracts.
Various States Capitals: Department of Agriculture, Horticulture,
Animal Husbandary & Livestock, and Fishery.
... 46 ...
7084
7364
Madhya Pradesh Umaria
Rajasthan
... 47 ...
7701
7965
8075
8473
8556
Bikaner
Tirap
Gadag
Kargil
Rajasthan
Arunachal
Pradesh
Karnataka
Jammu &
Kashmir
Madhya Pradesh Panna
8466
8196
8046
Madhya Pradesh Shahdol
Pali
Madhya Pradesh Dindori
Rajasthan
Ajmer
6616
4770
Jodhpur
Churu
Rajasthan
3317
Rajasthan
Jaisalmer
Rajasthan
2909
6491
Barmer
Rajasthan
Av.
Prod./
hec
Madhya Pradesh Anuppur
District
State
7236
3021
10050
NA
28538
2797
11301
5269
7510
4569
12975
NA
8379
13403
6386
Av.
Prod./
worker
30
19
41
NA
26
20
23
21
17
FERT_
NSA
33
100
19
11
14
16
18
11
12
NIA
%
28
100
15
16
15
16
14
15
19
10
GIA
%
0.9
5.6
6.0
NA
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.1
1.1
0.7
1.1
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
FVA
%
116
110
129
133
107
116
108
133
115
130
106
120
118
109
106
1.18
2.80
0.84
NA
0.28
2.88
0.70
1.46
0.98
1.55
0.51
NA
0.57
0.25
0.46
1186
100
612
243
1335
424.4
1481
601.8
1093
313.7
910
354.7
185.5
265.7
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
248
380
14
1437
176
579
205
419
108
1287
162
1160
472
1574
Net
sown
area
49.60
6.40
35.40
64.40
27.20
72.00
7.40
76.40
23.90
13.60
3.30
13.30
Rural
poor
%
Annex I
Per hectare productivity in various districts of India arranged in ascending order, alongwith other salient
characteristics
8801
9017
9200
9336
9338
Madhya Pradesh Mandla
Dantewara
Nagaur
Jalore
Osmanabad
Rajasthan
Madhya Pradesh Sidhi
Rajsamand
Chhattisgarh
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Maharashtra
... 48 ...
9796
Beed
Ahmednagar
West Siang
Dharwad
Doda
Raichur
Aurangabad
Jashpur
Gulbarga
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Arunachal
Pradesh
Karnataka
Jammu &
Kashmir
Karnataka
Maharashtra
Chhattisgarh
Karnataka
11183
11108
11076
11073
11034
10492
9969
9921
9769
Madhya Pradesh Jhabua
9391
9085
8664
Bijapur
Karnataka
Av.
Prod./
hec
District
State
14559
7942
9935
12071
3348
9408
8687
8114
9791
5495
8582
4028
5368
10768
14174
7780
4852
13280
Av.
Prod./
worker
65
12
106
161
22
73
NA
93
64
55
30
27
24
24
21
21
45
FERT_
NSA
14
22
26
11
12
27
25
27
16
21
17
30
21
21
NIA
%
15
24
27
10
23
28
30
14
16
13
28
23
20
GIA
%
0.9
3.0
0.4
1.9
0.8
9.9
NA
3.0
1.9
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.8
0.9
0.6
2.6
FVA
%
119
106
116
112
127
152
120
109
113
117
160
108
136
121
116
101
129
116
0.77
1.40
1.11
0.92
3.30
1.12
1.15
1.22
1.00
1.78
1.09
2.32
1.74
0.85
0.64
1.16
1.81
0.65
777
1447
786
616
NA
772
676
685
768
809
567.8
1174
370
311.7
1283.3
1425
578
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
1183
250
692
581
66
328
24
1103
762
360
481
94
358
659
1273
290
218
780
Net
sown
area
39.40
35.00
46.50
59.20
9.70
10.30
55.00
56.90
10.30
24.90
57.60
13.40
31.80
88.20
73.70
20.00
Rural
poor
%
11759
11921
11950
Dangs
Dhule
Washim
Bastar
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Chhattisgarh
... 49 ...
12357
Nandurbar
Buldhana
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
12661
12701
12708
Jalna
Akola
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Madhya Pradesh Satna
Rajasthan
Dungarpur
12406
Kupwara
Jammu &
Kashmir
12661
12393
Madhya Pradesh Katni
12364
12001
Madhya Pradesh Barwani
11970
11718
Madhya Pradesh Rewa
Panch Mahals
11538
11358
Gujarat
Kawardha
Chhattisgarh
11353
11381
Ramanathapuram
Tamil Nadu
Av.
Prod./
hec
Madhya Pradesh Ashok Nagar
District
State
3875
9308
12270
12791
4202
8762
9949
7274
6287
7588
11530
9633
8282
6435
4185
NA
8263
7134
Av.
Prod./
worker
59
70
79
98
88
73
88
86
82
12
53
108
58
123
18
48
61
FERT_
NSA
29
37
16
44
30
20
32
12
24
16
30
20
38
NIA
%
21
28
17
43
26
23
28
14
19
17
25
19
38
GIA
%
0.1
1.8
2.4
2.3
21.9
1.9
0.8
NA
1.5
1.4
NA
1.9
4.0
1.0
1.8
0.2
1.3
0.4
FVA
%
143
133
110
116
105
133
107
111
116
103
112
105
104
135
108
122
128
100
3.28
1.36
1.03
0.99
2.95
1.41
1.24
1.70
1.91
1.58
1.04
1.24
1.42
1.82
2.76
NA
1.37
1.59
728.9
1138
878
1472
NA
1025
901
1358.5
738
2262.6
1079
690.6
676
712.2
821.2
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
124
360
436
579
43
198
676
296
232
351
379
435
56
371
276
306
185
191
Net
sown
area
25.20
19.80
23.40
35.80
13.10
48.90
31.00
49.40
6.30
80.60
23.80
38.20
88.40
43.10
38.30
16.90
36.70
Rural
poor
%
Raipur
Mahasmund
Rajnandgaon
Gumla
Bidar
Tonk
Yavatmal
Gadchiroli
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Rajasthan
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
... 50 ...
13804
13898
14091
Madhya Pradesh Khandwa
Madhya Pradesh Betul
Udaipur
Sikar
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Madhya Pradesh Raisen
13767
Lower
Subansiri
Arunachal
Pradesh
14230
14157
13718
Sirohi
Rajasthan
20768
12631
4938
11378
NA
NA
11573
15187
8345
13659
13707
Madhya Pradesh Guna
Madhya Pradesh Damoh
5500
12939
17012
14182
5019
9246
10211
9156
10843
10105
Av.
Prod./
worker
13644
13601
13538
13494
13442
13334
13277
13247
13139
Latur
Maharashtra
Av.
Prod./
hec
13062
District
Madhya Pradesh Seoni
State
62
30
59
45
112
NA
56
33
58
73
65
49
37
10
53
74
91
70
25
FERT_
NSA
42
43
24
25
35
17
37
34
39
28
39
11
NA
18
24
48
26
NIA
%
36
38
19
19
28
13
39
27
30
31
32
NA
16
23
40
21
GIA
%
0.4
1.0
0.3
1.2
2.2
NA
1.3
0.8
0.2
1.0
1.5
0.7
1.4
3.1
1.6
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.8
FVA
%
117
142
129
132
125
131
130
127
130
113
105
124
122
103
125
110
122
134
128
0.69
1.12
2.85
1.22
NA
NA
1.19
0.90
1.64
2.48
1.05
0.80
0.95
2.68
1.44
1.30
1.45
1.21
1.29
1595
440.3
645
1129
961
591.2
1218
1222
1574
1133
668.3
891
1100
1108.3
2226.2
944.4
891
1447
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
431
525
246
401
312
18
146
310
326
169
849
461
368
215
360
267
549
521
366
Net
sown
area
58.10
10.50
20.90
53.70
14.10
27.00
49.00
16.60
65.00
42.10
24.80
31.00
68.60
58.60
21.40
31.20
53.90
60.00
Rural
poor
%
Upper
Subansiri
Sonbhadra
Arunachal
Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
... 51 ...
14817
14933
Madhya Pradesh Balaghat
Dahod
Chitrakut
Gujarat
Uttar Pradesh
Mahoba
Koppal
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
Karnataka
15246
15218
15125
15071
Koriya
Parbhani
Chhattisgarh
15058
Madhya Pradesh Chhatarpur
14959
14751
14677
14628
14604
14575
14431
14383
14354
14333
14263
14244
Av.
Prod./
hec
Madhya Pradesh Khargaon
Solapur
Banswara
Rajasthan
Maharashtra
Thensang
Nagaland
Bagalkot
Mokokchun
Nagaland
Karnataka
Patan
Gujarat
Bhilwara
Surguja
Chhattisgarh
Rajasthan
District
State
13412
15736
14901
7968
13265
9243
4700
6837
NA
13499
13479
9464
6674
7261
5538
4220
5867
16186
8039
Av.
Prod./
worker
132
34
85
24
66
44
37
57
114
67
104
63
74
NA
117
50
41
FERT_
NSA
31
47
11
54
29
27
44
42
20
43
33
32
19
34
12
13
27
NIA
%
31
39
43
28
25
40
36
23
41
27
34
16
26
15
19
30
GIA
%
2.4
5.1
1.2
5.7
1.6
0.4
1.6
1.0
0.9
3.1
3.9
0.4
1.1
NA
0.1
NA
NA
1.5
5.1
FVA
%
129
122
167
112
126
112
141
124
116
112
115
134
142
121
140
116
128
109
116
1.14
0.97
1.02
1.89
1.14
1.62
3.18
2.17
NA
1.09
1.09
1.54
2.18
1.99
2.60
3.40
2.44
0.88
1.77
577
850.7
905
1377.8
1044
940
583.6
1474
888
743
567
683.2
1134.1
950.3
393
1391.6
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
356
241
490
106
394
173
212
263
409
1027
433
390
181
235
47
30
387
483
Net
sown
area
3.70
23.20
52.20
49.70
52.80
81.50
41.40
53.50
4.70
11.00
18.10
18.50
24.80
50.10
42.40
49.70
Rural
poor
%
15431
15478
15704
Banda
Madhya Pradesh Vidisha
Mahaboobnagar
Korba
West
Kameng
Uttar Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Arunachal
Pradesh
... 52 ...
Jhunjhunu
Simdega
Raigarh
Mon
Upper Siang
Hamirpur
Jharkhand
Chhattisgarh
Nagaland
Arunachal
Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
16239
16159
16096
16094
16061
16021
16027
Madhya Pradesh Bhind
Rajasthan
16008
15900
15406
JanjgirChampa
15396
Chhattisgarh
East Kameng
Arunachal
Pradesh
15367
15399
Leh
Jammu &
Kashmir
Av.
Prod./
hec
Madhya Pradesh Sagar
District
State
15556
8001
4326
9399
NA
12915
13846
5889
7584
8342
24546
11398
8411
18790
6206
6316
Av.
Prod./
worker
38
NA
90
27
80
NA
16
87
53
28
138
39
NA
20
FERT_
NSA
36
58
19
NA
52
33
18
43
34
52
39
19
83
NIA
%
32
33
17
19
NA
36
31
22
34
41
49
29
12
100
GIA
%
2.7
NA
NA
5.9
3.7
0.3
0.6
NA
6.9
4.8
0.3
0.3
2.7
1.3
NA
6.0
FVA
%
117
177
124
112
106
154
108
150
107
108
126
122
117
135
168
103
1.04
2.02
3.72
1.71
NA
1.24
1.16
2.72
2.10
1.88
0.63
1.35
1.83
0.82
2.48
2.43
850.7
1259.7
405.1
1148
1465.2
604
1331
945.5
1165.4
1395
100
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
302
31
281
82
426
329
133
708
534
350
262
536
10
Net
sown
area
44.10
23.60
3.60
16.40
22.70
11.80
51.30
52.80
29.80
55.70
Rural
poor
%
... 53 ...
Wokha
Haveri
Hanumangarh
Chitradurga
Madhubani
Nagaland
Karnataka
Rajasthan
Karnataka
Bihar
Madhya Pradesh Shivpuri
Jamui
Bihar
18397
18270
18205
18127
17878
17715
17640
17569
17399
Kutch
17191
Gujarat
Phek
Nagaland
17004
Araria
Saiha
Mizoram
16986
Bihar
Chandrapur
Maharashtra
16776
17375
Lakhisarai
Bihar
13775
4019
14305
29540
12773
16131
2950
NA
4258
8760
13987
12615
8409
12213
4794
7483
16751
South Garo
Hills
Pauri
Garhwal
Uttrakhand
13914
11374
Av.
Prod./
worker
16477
Meghalaya
Anantpur
Andhra Pradesh
16349
17263
Kanker
Chhattisgarh
Av.
Prod./
hec
Madhya Pradesh Datia
District
State
46
31
48
63
87
118
52
76
56
79
83
56
41
FERT_
NSA
47
45
18
39
16
10
34
26
38
58
35
11
20
61
11
NIA
%
36
44
18
48
14
20
39
31
38
50
37
13
22
68
12
13
GIA
%
0.5
7.4
5.5
0.1
5.4
NA
8.5
4.8
4.3
NA
0.8
NA
NA
1.4
3.8
15.5
4.3
3.3
FVA
%
132
141
118
142
125
126
109
107
156
124
118
119
100
115
121
154
105
107
1.34
4.55
1.27
0.61
1.40
1.10
5.98
NA
4.09
1.98
1.23
1.36
2.02
1.39
3.50
2.24
1.18
1.44
1179
1414
472
273.5
753
312.4
1817
973
1474
553
1335
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
405
225
409
779
355
34
78
680
182
18
200
39
10
451
64
83
1018
207
Net
sown
area
38.70
59.20
24.80
27.20
55.10
46.30
20.00
54.60
14.70
30.10
38.60
31.80
20.20
53.10
Rural
poor
%
Saraikela
Kohima
Changlang
Ahmedabad
Lalitpur
Udhampur
Nagapattinam
Adilabad
Nagaland
Arunachal
Pradesh
Gujarat
Uttar Pradesh
Jammu &
Kashmir
Tamil Nadu
Andhra Pradesh
East Siang
Arunachal
Pradesh
Jharkhand
Sawai
Madhopur
Rajasthan
Aizwal
Lunglei
Mizoram
Mizoram
18658
Madhya Pradesh Rajgarh
Zunheboto
18644
Bellary
Karnataka
Nagaland
18510
Jaipur
Rajasthan
... 54 ...
19436
19436
19385
19342
19301
18945
18836
18805
18802
18771
18702
18686
18463
18405
Thiruvarur
Tamil Nadu
Av.
Prod./
hec
District
State
15431
6992
5773
15418
26903
6566
8725
NA
4843
18027
24335
15349
4239
15321
13003
16032
7019
Av.
Prod./
worker
74
202
40
46
96
NA
34
NA
116
26
58
227
71
214
FERT_
NSA
15
81
77
34
32
28
NA
10
57
63
40
36
48
96
NIA
%
15
62
53
38
23
31
NA
11
16
59
50
28
38
41
73
GIA
%
5.9
1.2
0.3
4.7
3.8
NA
NA
4.0
NA
NA
NA
0.3
NA
0.6
2.9
2.0
0.5
FVA
%
102
159
161
145
110
141
117
108
100
126
101
128
100
141
117
147
145
1.26
2.78
3.36
1.25
0.72
2.89
2.16
NA
3.88
1.04
0.77
1.22
4.40
1.22
1.42
1.15
2.62
1157
1341.7
NA
880.1
621
873.4
1157
613
563.8
1129.9
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
546
138
70
272
509
16
37
60
17
28
25
280
11
421
433
666
135
Net
sown
area
26.10
7.00
9.30
42.70
11.30
18.50
11.90
40.00
12.50
11.30
Rural
poor
%
20315
... 55 ...
20562
Baramulla
Jhansi
Mirzapur
Jammu &
Kashmir
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
20903
20960
Amravati
Buragarh
S.Ravi Das
Nagar
Kolasib
Maharashtra
Orissa
Uttar Pradesh
Mizoram
21190
20978
20891
Madhya Pradesh Tikamgarh
20768
20677
20541
Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
20364
Mamit
Gaya
20099
Mizoram
Dhemaji
Assam
19801
Bihar
Belgaum
Karnataka
19725
20239
Virudunagar
Tamil Nadu
19645
Madhya Pradesh Shajapur
Morigon
Assam
19500
20151
Tumkur
Karnataka
Av.
Prod./
hec
Madhya Pradesh Dhar
District
State
12478
8961
25594
19783
11546
9149
18088
16199
17571
3645
10873
17863
15373
6200
11940
9715
9468
12201
Av.
Prod./
worker
22
269
129
52
73
122
70
102
83
193
63
119
118
90
65
52
FERT_
NSA
36
81
39
73
58
64
47
36
74
20
43
45
NA
43
39
NA
22
NIA
%
40
81
NA
10
56
65
49
50
30
83
23
29
32
NA
38
41
NA
22
GIA
%
NA
4.2
3.1
5.9
2.0
2.1
6.0
27.2
4.1
7.7
NA
1.7
0.7
7.8
4.5
4.9
4.3
2.9
FVA
%
100
143
135
106
153
146
131
115
137
122
100
149
139
162
128
104
135
106
1.70
2.34
0.82
1.06
1.81
2.27
1.14
1.27
1.17
5.59
1.87
1.13
1.31
3.24
1.66
2.03
2.07
1.60
1052.3
1527
976
1100
1134.1
879.1
1270
1447
1095
1117
915
3471.7
835
829.6
1165.8
541
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
13
68
320
751
255
200
344
82
275
179
11
452
506
63
781
139
92
574
Net
sown
area
30.60
61.70
39.50
44.10
28.60
19.80
6.00
33.30
37.50
29.00
23.90
0.00
12.00
22.90
21.50
20.60
Rural
poor
%
21261
21377
21412
21428
Siwan
Nanded
Satara
Denapur
Surendranagar
Poonch
Sivagangai
Dausa
Nawapara
Durg
Tehri
Garhwal
Kurnool
Sundargarh
Lakhimpur
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Nagaland
Madhya Pradesh Mandsaur
Bolangir
Bihar
Orissa
Gujarat
Jammu &
Kashmir
Tamil Nadu
... 56 ...
Rajasthan
Orissa
Chhattisgarh
Uttrakhand
Andhra Pradesh
Orissa
Assam
22188
22143
22115
22097
22068
21892
21843
21772
21689
21618
21327
21311
21219
Madhya Pradesh Bhopal
Av.
Prod./
hec
21210
District
Madhya Pradesh Chindwara
State
5913
15565
16183
7081
16190
18451
12034
7683
4229
37711
17874
16731
39347
12375
16464
6321
23943
17697
Av.
Prod./
worker
17
24
149
76
31
103
72
54
78
30
83
92
86
73
94
48
FERT_
NSA
NA
18
17
14
36
20
73
67
13
16
31
39
34
11
61
51
23
NIA
%
NA
NA
19
17
30
NA
48
67
14
18
NA
22
49
36
13
45
36
20
GIA
%
7.7
14.6
5.3
21.9
4.0
10.7
0.5
5.0
0.1
2.3
9.2
1.1
NA
4.9
1.6
7.7
1.6
3.3
FVA
%
172
126
109
158
142
148
155
100
167
105
132
140
124
116
113
148
142
123
3.75
1.42
1.37
3.12
1.36
1.19
1.82
2.83
5.13
0.57
1.20
1.28
0.54
1.72
1.29
3.36
0.89
1.20
1544.6
1647.6
670
1706
1064.1
1378.2
561
876
NA
470.6
1443.5
962
1119
915
1154
1211
1094
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
100
309
873
60
550
161
220
117
27
702
334
357
62
539
705
163
153
484
Net
sown
area
1.40
69.90
24.60
61.20
35.50
70.10
19.60
13.10
20.50
66.30
15.50
4.90
42.80
30.20
34.50
30.90
Rural
poor
%
22631
22654
22755
22787
Naworangpur
Jahanabad
Supaul
East Garo
Hills
Bihar
Madhya Pradesh Morena
West Garo
Hills
Bihar
Madhya Pradesh Ujjain
Banka
Orissa
Bihar
Meghalaya
Meghalaya
... 57 ...
23067
Chamrajnagar
Karur
Sangli
Ganganagar
Karnataka
Tamil Nadu
Maharashtra
Rajasthan
23122
Siddharth
Nagar
Bhojpur
Uttar Pradesh
Bihar
23144
23092
Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
23091
23091
23071
23051
Madhya Pradesh Sehore
23013
22942
22617
22396
22391
Shivasti
Uttar Pradesh
Av.
Prod./
hec
District
State
8733
8015
22605
36590
15873
7389
11922
24004
8169
10220
6392
15009
21675
5201
3809
11355
7112
Av.
Prod./
worker
207
157
119
100
118
73
100
73
22
113
89
48
181
61
115
FERT_
NSA
65
64
55
71
20
41
28
57
19
10
58
62
44
60
84
42
NIA
%
82
44
56
78
20
42
26
37
27
10
69
51
28
54
82
NA
31
GIA
%
8.6
3.0
1.2
0.7
2.6
8.3
5.0
0.4
NA
NA
10.0
0.5
1.3
3.9
7.1
13.1
0.9
FVA
%
112
149
125
132
121
102
121
157
117
130
105
124
158
173
124
144
146
2.65
2.88
1.02
0.63
1.45
3.12
1.93
0.96
2.82
2.24
3.56
1.52
1.05
4.35
5.94
1.97
3.15
1079
1264
900
226.4
571
742.2
696
1169
927
1088
1095
1521.8
1147.8
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
184
236
209
693
596
94
165
383
32
68
153
266
489
151
63
212
130
Net
sown
area
41.60
66.30
20.50
22.80
17.50
10.20
13.80
39.10
59.80
20.80
28.90
20.00
54.20
80.60
56.10
Rural
poor
%
23381
23443
Darrang
Jainta Hills
Assam
Meghalaya
... 58 ...
Dholpur
Nalbari
Dhubri
Arval
Purnea
Assam
Assam
Bihar
Bihar
Champaran(East)
Bihar
Rajasthan
23774
Buxar
Bihar
Mayurbhanj
G.Buddha
Nagar
Uttar Pradesh
Wardha
Sabarkantha
Gujarat
Orissa
Bilaspur
Chhattisgarh
Maharashtra
23708
Kalahandi
Orissa
24008
23959
23955
23830
23796
23779
23632
23613
23600
23524
23493
23471
Chhimtuipui
Hassan
Mizoram
Karnataka
23248
23232
Chittorgarh
Rajasthan
Av.
Prod./
hec
23165
District
Madhya Pradesh Sheopur Kala
State
6232
NA
11983
18504
14814
22341
13689
6586
10501
21915
17788
13775
17132
14892
6061
7583
14343
13536
19445
Av.
Prod./
worker
191
NA
118
74
88
61
37
128
96
142
151
97
60
128
22
15
87
107
93
FERT_
NSA
43
79
NA
NA
67
26
42
65
77
32
38
32
22
36
20
NA
39
67
NIA
%
56
81
NA
NA
51
NA
48
79
100
33
30
NA
21
40
30
NA
29
57
GIA
%
8.5
6.9
7.7
10.1
1.2
2.2
12.0
9.9
8.0
0.3
5.3
7.0
8.8
12.9
NA
NA
10.2
0.4
0.5
FVA
%
137
130
153
137
136
119
122
114
111
113
119
131
149
117
100
101
143
146
123
3.85
NA
2.00
1.29
1.61
1.06
1.74
3.60
2.25
1.08
1.33
1.71
1.37
1.58
3.87
3.08
1.62
1.72
1.19
1483
3225.2
1904.4
744
1144
1648.2
1253
719.7
567.6
1089.6
1378.2
1247
1796.6
841.5
730
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
216
41
144
154
151
365
394
294
139
118
447
368
362
384
13
31
205
420
157
Net
sown
area
29.00
42.40
15.00
8.70
20.90
52.50
20.10
54.20
2.60
20.20
34.80
70.50
5.10
0.10
15.50
37.60
Rural
poor
%
24288
24327
Madhya Pradesh Harda
Amreli
Ballia
Kishanganj
KarbiAnglong
West
Singhbhum
Nagpur
Gujarat
Uttar Pradesh
Bihar
Assam
Jharkhand
Maharashtra
... 59 ...
24838
Kaushambi
Bongaigaon
Dibrugarh
Aurangabad
Uttar Pradesh
Assam
Assam
Bihar
25038
Champaran
(West)
Bundi
Sheikhpura
Bihar
Rajasthan
Bihar
25112
25055
25030
Madhya Pradesh Ratlam
25023
24931
24856
24634
Madhya Pradesh Narsimpur
24590
24460
24433
24416
24411
24232
Medak
Andhra Pradesh
Av.
Prod./
hec
District
State
6174
19233
7232
20192
9217
19667
14181
8131
24048
22217
6438
12779
9063
9567
34780
24482
11719
Av.
Prod./
worker
177
125
158
93
123
55
106
187
47
127
13
18
169
80
138
96
FERT_
NSA
82
76
35
33
81
NA
NA
70
56
NA
NA
23
77
19
76
25
NIA
%
75
59
48
23
78
NA
NA
64
43
NA
NA
26
69
21
44
29
GIA
%
8.5
0.8
8.6
0.7
6.7
9.1
8.5
4.5
1.0
8.0
7.8
5.0
6.7
3.6
3.0
0.2
4.3
FVA
%
129
145
134
144
123
129
165
135
132
107
109
154
149
162
105
175
126
4.07
1.30
3.46
1.24
2.71
1.27
1.75
3.05
1.02
1.11
3.80
1.91
2.69
2.55
0.70
0.99
2.07
773.4
1216
1078
1153
2249.7
3219.4
975.9
1690
1242
1314
1121.5
2422
1013.1
479.4
916
874
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
38
253
281
330
197
138
95
132
302
547
176
126
130
221
547
173
423
Net
sown
area
28.60
3.50
76.90
17.10
55.40
19.20
33.00
45.50
36.60
39.30
53.80
26.50
62.30
51.50
0.50
37.20
9.30
Rural
poor
%
Jhalawar
Vadodara
Pratapgarh
Tawang
Palamau
Kamrup
Rajasthan
Gujarat
Uttar Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
Jharkhand
Assam
... 60 ...
25763
Jharsugda
Koraput
Bhandara
Fatehpur
Karauli
Rudrapryag
Gopalganj
Barpeta
Orissa
Orissa
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
Rajasthan
Uttrakhand
Bihar
Assam
26316
26178
26151
26091
26024
25893
25820
25753
Madhya Pradesh Dewas
25674
25626
25485
25428
25405
25361
25350
Bharatpur
25176
Rajasthan
Kokrajhar
Assam
25144
25269
Allahabad
Uttar Pradesh
Av.
Prod./
hec
Madhya Pradesh Hoshangabad
District
State
16148
7504
6699
14868
11115
23995
17454
22437
22198
16338
5091
10605
7480
16217
17747
15762
30582
9419
9048
Av.
Prod./
worker
93
48
53
182
61
25
89
86
81
43
NA
191
132
92
88
164
70
261
FERT_
NSA
NA
66
14
56
64
53
29
16
41
NA
NA
13
87
41
58
75
85
NA
77
NIA
%
NA
47
17
36
66
48
NA
NA
27
NA
NA
88
44
39
54
51
NA
80
GIA
%
11.3
8.1
8.7
0.6
3.2
3.8
18.4
14.9
1.5
9.3
8.9
NA
3.3
7.6
1.5
0.7
1.2
7.8
3.3
FVA
%
154
154
160
156
139
138
134
132
151
140
120
177
148
110
154
143
167
160
148
1.63
3.49
3.90
1.75
2.34
1.08
1.48
1.15
1.16
1.57
5.03
2.40
3.40
1.57
1.43
1.61
0.83
2.67
2.78
1909.1
1187
670.7
903.6
1349
1521.8
1527
1079
1428.6
1237
977.9
686.2
844.3
663.9
1385
3767.7
975.9
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
180
150
20
196
292
362
282
77
385
180
126
214
516
315
394
297
85
338
Net
sown
area
39.90
27.40
8.70
6.40
31.10
51.20
74.20
58.70
17.70
22.30
54.30
65.20
5.60
18.20
16.60
37.20
35.70
34.50
Rural
poor
%
... 61 ...
Varanasi
Nawadha
Jaunpur
Uttar Pradesh
Bihar
Uttar Pradesh
27171
27160
27091
26897
Ghazipur
27208
Gorakhpur
Uttar Pradesh
26876
Uttar Pradesh
Nalgonda
Andhra Pradesh
26795
27190
Latehar
Jharkhand
26790
26683
26627
26574
26513
26501
26499
26474
26451
26424
26405
Av.
Prod./
hec
Madhya Pradesh Neemach
Saran
Goalpara
Assam
Bihar
Rewari
Haryana
Sibsagar
Jalaun
Uttar Pradesh
Assam
Deogarh
Orissa
Devanagrre
Bahraich
Uttar Pradesh
Dhamtari
Mahesana
Gujarat
Karnataka
Sonitpur
Assam
Chhattisgarh
District
State
9961
19375
8488
5104
9367
9039
12317
NA
8167
19728
12675
18794
13930
17473
23379
17234
12173
23245
14776
Av.
Prod./
worker
219
114
175
97
516
241
206
82
11
205
139
116
184
75
41
112
109
29
FERT_
NSA
84
34
87
73
96
82
32
NA
55
NA
74
35
NA
86
54
25
46
57
NA
NIA
%
84
23
81
85
85
61
38
NA
51
NA
51
39
NA
80
45
NA
34
55
NA
GIA
%
3.7
0.9
4.1
10.6
4.4
3.2
12.1
8.7
9.7
7.4
5.5
3.7
10.3
0.4
7.2
14.2
1.7
9.0
9.4
FVA
%
163
147
160
122
149
152
116
121
121
111
159
117
137
154
122
156
151
128
147
2.73
1.40
3.20
5.32
2.89
2.98
2.18
NA
3.28
1.35
2.10
1.41
1.90
1.52
1.13
1.54
2.17
1.14
1.79
1051.8
749
997.9
1056.4
1364.1
751
NA
1168
1900.8
1223.6
595
2458.7
409
786.6
1527
1145.5
632.8
1646.1
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
254
187
277
102
106
252
495
60
193
138
134
364
79
128
349
65
327
349
166
Net
sown
area
53.70
0.20
27.90
38.80
33.10
56.50
5.40
NA
55.90
20.30
38.50
42.20
33.90
16.80
15.30
73.40
43.70
27.30
3.60
Rural
poor
%
Azamgarh
Tinsukia
Chikmagalur
Jamtara
Sambalpur
Bhavnagar
Cuddapah
Bhabhua
Assam
Karnataka
Jharkhand
Orissa
Gujarat
Andhra Pradesh
Bihar
Alwar
Rajasthan
Uttar Pradesh
Raebareli
Uttar Pradesh
Rajouri
Budgam
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu &
Kashmir
Banas Kantha
Gujarat
Pakaur
Rangareddy
Andhra Pradesh
Jharkhand
Garhwa
Jharkhand
Kanpur
Dehat
Deogarh
Jharkhand
Uttar Pradesh
District
State
... 62 ...
28537
28315
28001
27985
27922
27846
27805
27792
27782
27766
27742
27727
27658
27617
27577
27508
27448
27229
Av.
Prod./
hec
11948
15199
37014
22197
NA
30513
15765
9539
9668
7721
15372
13540
9340
8443
28275
12087
5152
6081
Av.
Prod./
worker
78
117
97
108
131
54
152
45
40
159
84
171
193
94
411
50
119
FERT_
NSA
75
31
35
33
NA
11
NA
91
14
NA
74
88
87
56
48
21
NA
NA
NIA
%
82
34
35
NA
NA
11
NA
84
NA
67
62
85
60
46
26
NA
NA
GIA
%
5.8
9.8
10.3
12.9
9.3
10.1
13.8
2.7
0.1
10.9
2.2
1.9
2.8
7.4
4.8
11.6
8.1
10.3
FVA
%
128
115
111
144
105
109
142
168
185
107
143
161
155
109
139
110
136
104
2.39
1.86
0.76
1.26
NA
0.91
1.76
2.91
2.87
3.60
1.80
2.05
2.96
3.27
0.98
2.28
5.33
4.48
700
521.2
1527
NA
2061
2609.6
1021.3
NA
1355.0
801.5
657.3
927.6
585
462
781
NA
1242
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
153
397
561
179
55
282
99
302
53
58
221
506
270
52
744
253
64
63
Net
sown
area
42.00
5.40
1.20
79.50
NA
2.00
14.40
29.50
75.60
35.60
9.90
54.40
2.90
26.00
10.90
38.60
58.70
Rural
poor
%
Pithoragerh
Jhajjer
Jammu
Kheda
Coimbatore
Deoria
Tiruvannmalai
Jorhat
Haryana
Jammu &
Kashmir
Gujarat
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Assam
Prakasam
Andhra Pradesh
Uttrakhand
Chandauli
Uttar Pradesh
Karimganj
Balasore
Orissa
Assam
Srikakulam
Andhra Pradesh
Raigad
Champawat
Uttrakhand
Maharashtra
Anantnagh
Jammu &
Kashmir
Pune
Mau
Uttar Pradesh
Maharashtra
District
State
... 63 ...
29632
29616
29589
29511
29243
29191
29143
29135
29037
28952
28935
28885
28771
28711
28711
28700
28630
28610
Av.
Prod./
hec
18585
8708
10311
16516
17006
21370
19807
8582
16638
11917
22069
15504
11444
15481
10550
9258
10524
9854
Av.
Prod./
worker
59
152
369
150
193
119
145
60
69
101
145
259
136
23
199
216
FERT_
NSA
NA
52
84
49
65
52
81
10
NA
25
23
94
NA
59
12
59
90
NIA
%
NA
58
59
49
63
51
78
NA
27
23
87
NA
47
12
71
81
GIA
%
12.6
2.4
2.3
6.9
8.5
0.6
0.5
15.8
9.2
4.7
8.4
6.4
0.7
13.3
4.8
26.3
13.0
1.7
FVA
%
143
121
164
106
130
179
151
184
140
103
114
110
177
136
137
166
128
166
1.59
3.40
2.87
1.79
1.72
1.37
1.47
3.39
1.75
2.43
1.31
1.86
2.51
1.85
2.72
3.10
2.72
2.90
1803.7
1046.6
1145.1
694.4
668.4
NA
776.4
2207
4559.9
2655
715
872
1056.4
1568.4
1162
NA
1021.3
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
120
227
198
322
310
119
154
40
69
188
946
565
136
234
302
21
76
126
Net
sown
area
27.50
43.20
41.90
12.40
42.40
1.80
6.60
44.30
40.90
26.60
6.70
9.90
36.00
28.30
6.00
72.10
0.00
39.50
Rural
poor
%
Kathua
Sahibganj
Thane
Auraiya
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jharkhand
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
... 64 ...
Bageshwar
Bhagalpur
Hazaribagh
Baran
Godda
Paumpare
Gonda
Nagaon
Uttrakhand
Bihar
Jharkhand
Rajasthan
Jharkhand
Arunachal
Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Assam
Mahendra
Garh
Ranchi
Jharkhand
Haryana
Cachar
Assam
Samastipur
Dumka
Jharkhand
Bihar
District
State
31306
31215
31194
31070
31054
30972
30944
30924
30652
30554
30232
30163
30103
29922
29817
29728
29643
Av.
Prod./
hec
17289
11849
16540
7027
29423
6625
7520
7759
20125
6729
15126
10271
4916
16415
11041
21491
6758
Av.
Prod./
worker
109
149
NA
142
145
111
173
14
156
188
135
78
110
47
108
44
47
FERT_
NSA
NA
71
22
NA
85
NA
40
19
79
54
NA
NA
34
NA
NA
NA
NIA
%
NA
54
10
NA
62
NA
46
21
53
45
NA
NA
34
NA
NA
NA
GIA
%
9.3
1.8
NA
8.8
0.4
12.4
13.7
10.3
0.3
14.2
2.1
3.2
9.5
0.2
12.3
14.8
8.4
FVA
%
151
154
218
107
143
111
121
180
173
137
162
117
116
196
105
127
104
1.81
2.63
1.89
4.42
1.06
4.67
4.11
3.99
1.52
4.54
2.00
2.94
6.12
1.82
2.70
1.38
4.39
1541.7
1147.6
1282
873.8
1319
1146
310.9
1173
752.4
2617
1316
1672
1530
2366.1
1391
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
235
298
77
323
104
142
23
152
185
144
245
41
63
253
115
145
Net
sown
area
25.30
39.00
41.30
6.50
28.30
45.20
33.70
8.40
52.30
28.80
40.30
63.70
5.00
23.20
33.50
55.40
Rural
poor
%
Lohardaga
Jamnagar
Basti
Rohtas
Patna
Jajpur
Uttarakannada
Mathura
Chittoor
Gujarat
Uttar Pradesh
Bihar
Bihar
Orissa
Karnataka
Uttar Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Visakhapatnam
Andhra Pradesh
Jharkhand
Vizianagarm
Andhra Pradesh
Perambalur
Valsad
Gujarat
Tamil Nadu
Balrampur
Uttar Pradesh
Nayagarh
Gandhinagar
Gujarat
Almora
Rayagada
Orissa
Uttrakhand
Hardoi
Uttar Pradesh
Orissa
District
State
... 65 ...
32794
32772
32732
32404
32367
32321
32321
32233
32201
32197
32064
31994
31855
31851
31832
31807
31739
31709
31498
Av.
Prod./
hec
10657
20097
15560
19838
8448
14968
11215
56677
11382
30463
11676
23614
11267
12517
15108
10912
23406
16104
15360
Av.
Prod./
worker
108
149
83
67
170
151
367
84
139
64
41
94
97
106
96
113
46
118
FERT_
NSA
34
98
20
28
60
99
62
20
NA
27
24
31
42
28
39
59
20
88
NIA
%
40
79
19
NA
70
90
56
22
NA
29
NA
33
37
29
35
57
NA
77
GIA
%
19.3
2.7
3.7
12.6
12.8
5.4
3.1
2.4
12.3
14.8
16.7
15.7
11.3
12.3
30.7
1.7
10.2
17.6
3.2
FVA
%
110
149
110
173
118
139
146
113
112
109
160
165
127
135
111
144
122
151
154
3.08
1.63
2.10
1.63
3.83
2.16
2.88
0.57
2.83
1.06
2.75
1.35
2.83
2.54
2.11
2.91
1.36
1.97
2.05
935
591.4
2836
1501.3
1110
1142
1264
589.6
1411
949.6
1297
1449.1
1202
1131
1769.4
1149.9
541.8
1521.8
874.8
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
378
271
108
153
206
254
209
609
44
208
81
133
302
315
161
214
164
152
421
Net
sown
area
15.90
41.00
47.60
4.90
44.70
34.60
23.20
0.00
81.60
34.40
44.10
47.00
18.90
4.70
3.40
18.60
5.20
67.10
34.20
Rural
poor
%
... 66 ...
Kota
Bhiwani
Sonepur
Chamba
Sant Kabir
Nagar
Sitamarhi
Rajasthan
Haryana
Orissa
Himachal
Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Bihar
33042
33039
33030
33005
32936
32925
32861
Malkangiri
Sultanpur
Nalanda
Badaun
East
Singhbhum
Golaghat
Darbhanga
Nasik
Orissa
Uttar Pradesh
Bihar
Uttar Pradesh
Jharkhand
Assam
Bihar
Maharashtra
33750
33639
33595
33423
33420
33303
33241
33121
Unnao
Uttar Pradesh
32827
33077
Broach
Gujarat
Av.
Prod./
hec
Madhya Pradesh Indore
District
State
21206
7472
17444
8690
19342
8560
12276
20981
30322
5717
9809
8146
19473
33566
39311
14061
34619
Av.
Prod./
worker
130
141
31
64
188
166
157
32
169
111
175
27
47
98
192
160
96
FERT_
NSA
21
44
NA
NA
92
63
82
28
57
45
84
14
61
67
82
88
31
NIA
%
24
50
NA
NA
69
84
83
NA
34
38
51
10
NA
50
58
76
32
GIA
%
10.1
16.7
14.2
8.2
4.3
15.2
7.4
15.8
4.6
12.0
4.0
19.5
13.6
0.3
0.6
6.0
6.5
FVA
%
108
120
128
175
168
124
153
158
166
144
173
158
160
198
148
155
102
1.59
4.50
1.93
3.85
1.73
3.89
2.71
1.58
1.09
5.78
3.37
4.05
1.69
0.98
0.84
2.34
0.95
591
1258
2118.6
1300
821.2
1069
1000.4
1521.8
1054
1294
1264
1637.46
1443.5
314.3
732.4
840.8
770.6
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
877
172
117
83
416
181
284
131
259
117
120
42
108
399
270
300
332
Net
sown
area
48.00
42.20
25.50
58.40
28.80
44.80
28.50
67.90
21.80
28.10
58.00
20.70
51.30
18.30
3.90
24.10
17.10
Rural
poor
%
Madurai
Gajapatti
Ganjam
Pudukkottai
Katihar
Rohtak
Etah
Etawah
Mainpuri
Orissa
Orissa
Tamil Nadu
Bihar
Haryana
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Hailakandi
Assam
Tamil Nadu
Ri Bhoi
Meghalaya
Purulia
Kolhapur
Maharashtra
West Bengal
Thoothukudi
Tamil Nadu
Porbander
Warangal
Andhra Pradesh
Gujarat
Bhadrak
Orissa
Karimnagar
Lohit
Arunachal
Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
District
State
... 67 ...
35942
35477
35419
35230
35215
35130
35128
35115
34797
34794
34721
34577
34515
34485
34446
34045
33895
33815
33754
Av.
Prod./
hec
18535
31583
19688
26338
7678
10831
16212
12640
9321
15380
37862
12034
17890
11664
15068
24266
14531
13184
17489
Av.
Prod./
worker
244
105
171
237
62
334
85
54
254
131
37
296
30
202
61
216
125
NA
FERT_
NSA
99
83
95
78
46
63
63
30
51
39
16
57
NA
81
24
23
61
44
14
NIA
%
91
97
78
82
48
63
NA
NA
53
NA
17
62
NA
84
29
23
59
NA
GIA
%
6.3
5.1
6.2
0.7
11.4
7.4
17.8
28.6
10.6
10.0
4.4
4.4
11.7
NA
2.1
10.1
4.1
14.4
NA
FVA
%
166
161
161
155
164
101
171
179
104
106
112
134
141
111
102
102
125
134
190
1.94
1.12
1.80
1.34
4.59
3.24
2.17
2.78
3.73
2.26
0.92
2.87
1.93
2.96
2.29
1.40
2.33
2.56
1.93
720.2
752.4
694.9
454
1492
921.5
1295.6
1295.6
840
1361
431.8
967
3094.2
1137
655.7
993
1568.4
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
177
219
327
142
164
147
381
78
123
335
119
357
46
23
428
170
458
175
20
Net
sown
area
22.90
32.30
30.80
6.00
36.50
18.60
33.60
61.40
18.60
31.20
0.00
7.20
7.00
8.40
33.20
0.90
22.90
Rural
poor
%
Nellore
Faizabad
Krishnagiri
Pulwanna
Ambedkar
Nagar
Rajkot
Kedrapara
Uttar Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Jammu &
Kashmir
Uttar Pradesh
Gujarat
Orissa
Chatra
Jharkhand
Andhra Pradesh
Aligarh
Uttar Pradesh
Agra
Hamirpur
Himachal
Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Monghyr
Bihar
Narmada
Sindhudurg
Maharashtra
Gujarat
Khammam
Andhra Pradesh
Sitapur
Mysore
Karnataka
Uttar Pradesh
District
State
... 68 ...
39031
38607
38301
38220
38181
38005
37897
37879
37723
37101
37014
37008
36719
36570
36378
36108
35957
Av.
Prod./
hec
20706
66835
12309
18244
NA
8239
15379
27361
20449
18145
6740
23252
8778
9022
18770
17335
18472
Av.
Prod./
worker
44
139
274
203
NA
434
240
185
52
192
73
189
78
63
47
172
135
FERT_
NSA
36
28
94
63
22
92
73
85
23
84
NA
99
66
18
38
36
NIA
%
NA
30
94
70
22
89
72
62
25
75
NA
82
62
20
40
28
GIA
%
12.6
2.7
4.8
29.5
23.6
5.6
14.8
9.7
7.5
3.9
16.3
4.2
7.9
12.5
32.2
10.7
2.7
FVA
%
176
114
168
147
110
150
110
145
108
149
111
167
199
139
115
109
150
1.88
0.58
3.11
2.09
NA
4.61
2.46
1.38
1.84
2.04
5.49
1.59
4.18
4.05
1.94
2.08
1.95
1501.3
489.4
1028.9
NA
1298.1
1008.9
1080
655.5
775
974
NA
662.8
1242.42
956
2493
1124
739
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
139
763
166
56
180
135
308
284
111
436
45
302
35
47
140
430
334
Net
sown
area
31.50
10.40
50.40
0.00
25.00
14.10
22.10
24.50
27.60
55.20
19.80
6.30
35.60
2.30
13.10
14.20
Rural
poor
%
... 69 ...
40846
40855
41344
Villupuram
Madhya Pradesh Burhanpur
Cuttack
Muzafarpur
Firozabad
Boudh
Begusarai
Kushi Nagar
Tamil Nadu
Orissa
Bihar
Uttar Pradesh
Orissa
Bihar
Uttar Pradesh
41922
41743
41681
41525
41428
40568
40076
40064
40025
39959
Una
Khagaria
Bihar
39831
Himachal
Pradesh
Dehradun
Uttrakhand
39781
Giridih
Kancheepuram
Tamil Nadu
39712
Jharkhand
Didugul
Tamil Nadu
39709
Saharsa
Maharaj Ganj
Uttar Pradesh
39511
Vellore
Gurgaon
Haryana
39377
Bihar
Shahjahanpur
Uttar Pradesh
Av.
Prod./
hec
Tamil Nadu
District
State
11342
9844
27019
28390
10564
19857
NA
11079
11807
6407
10989
8718
8921
19643
11683
16151
11146
26297
25709
Av.
Prod./
worker
222
274
45
226
190
73
27
216
165
49
219
91
329
75
308
93
247
166
315
FERT_
NSA
72
69
44
94
53
57
31
57
23
NA
42
52
85
43
33
83
52
94
NIA
%
75
52
NA
71
39
NA
35
59
21
NA
44
50
64
44
34
48
68
90
GIA
%
2.2
14.2
18.3
13.4
14.3
14.5
15.9
5.7
8.6
14.6
10.3
10.3
10.4
35.9
4.2
18.9
2.4
1.7
1.7
FVA
%
154
145
151
156
164
190
113
120
192
120
122
177
157
156
127
103
181
174
165
3.70
4.24
1.54
1.46
3.92
2.08
NA
3.69
3.44
6.25
3.65
4.59
4.48
2.03
3.41
2.46
3.56
1.50
1.53
1145.1
1118
1597.1
655.5
1250
1501.3
497
1029.4
1171.44
1145
917
1525
1179
2315
1252.1
831.6
1364.1
484.9
1019.5
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
224
117
87
181
207
165
104
304
37
77
177
108
84
51
125
247
202
169
347
Net
sown
area
54.80
56.70
70.50
26.50
65.30
14.00
14.10
34.80
6.10
30.50
26.20
21.10
16.70
30.30
20.20
10.30
53.40
6.20
37.40
Rural
poor
%
District
Angul
Bareilly
Nizamabad
Uttarakashi
Thanjavur
Dharmapuri
Tiruchirapalli
Dhenkanal
Madhupura
Keonjhar
Kanpur City
Kangra
Salem
N C Hills
Chamoli
Krishna
Khurda
Mandi
State
Orissa
Uttar Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Uttrakhand
Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
Orissa
Bihar
Orissa
Uttar Pradesh
... 70 ...
Himachal
Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Assam
Uttrakhand
Andhra Pradesh
Orissa
Himachal
Pradesh
44401
44206
44069
43958
43716
43227
43128
42990
42945
42908
42838
42680
42442
42398
42286
42167
41946
41929
Av.
Prod./
hec
11302
33938
17977
14560
32482
12272
13464
17680
29109
9040
33529
12320
6724
13023
11717
13208
21308
31616
Av.
Prod./
worker
76
52
352
239
77
284
37
112
31
411
78
289
18
371
271
36
FERT_
NSA
16
31
65
NA
37
31
82
24
62
23
50
26
83
17
58
92
21
NIA
%
16
NA
51
NA
37
30
64
NA
65
NA
53
26
78
20
61
89
NA
GIA
%
20.6
26.3
13.0
22.5
30.2
19.1
17.4
5.4
20.5
12.8
21.4
13.4
21.8
3.5
26.1
4.0
2.6
24.1
FVA
%
187
160
143
148
127
114
188
173
150
156
166
108
111
129
155
150
168
169
3.93
1.30
2.45
3.02
1.35
3.52
3.20
2.43
1.48
4.75
1.28
3.46
6.31
3.26
3.61
3.19
1.97
1.33
1290.36
1449.1
1034
1233
1144.9
898
1581.32
801.5
1534.5
1421.1
761.5
855.9
1053
1036
1107.3
1421.1
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
86
134
445
35
28
197
117
153
292
129
167
160
158
173
29
206
328
199
Net
sown
area
10.00
27.80
2.80
35.70
6.10
37.40
11.40
28.60
46.10
7.70
57.10
19.80
40.30
7.50
19.50
23.10
30.20
53.00
Rural
poor
%
... 71 ...
Rampur
Kheri
Tirunelveli
Udupi
Jalgaon
Moradabad
Kannauj
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Karnataka
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Hoshiarpur
Punjab
Ratnagiri
East Khasi
Hills
Meghalaya
Maharashtra
Barabanki
Uttar Pradesh
Erode
Gurdaspur
Punjab
Kannur
Pilibhit
Uttar Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Ropar
Punjab
Kerala
Mandya
Shimoga
Karnataka
Junagarh
Gujarat
Karnataka
District
State
48129
48056
47868
47718
47243
46379
46369
46345
46336
46276
45722
45669
45443
45015
44853
44593
44492
44446
44403
Av.
Prod./
hec
21245
23394
35601
NA
13924
28301
24899
22017
61057
15956
43880
12969
16797
54078
32211
42256
21768
16527
36946
Av.
Prod./
worker
252
305
157
59
263
207
262
32
50
155
307
175
255
276
311
391
203
206
133
FERT_
NSA
92
98
17
32
65
80
88
10
42
83
33
84
74
97
86
56
49
33
NIA
%
74
84
19
27
67
76
94
NA
46
79
31
82
83
94
82
59
50
32
GIA
%
19.9
3.7
5.9
10.8
12.2
1.0
2.1
32.8
32.6
8.1
5.8
NA
5.7
1.2
0.7
2.7
3.7
10.6
7.5
FVA
%
158
176
108
123
116
147
188
121
129
106
179
126
181
172
172
180
112
119
128
2.27
2.05
1.34
NA
3.39
1.64
1.86
2.10
0.76
2.90
1.04
3.52
2.71
0.83
1.39
1.06
2.04
2.69
1.20
795.4
944.3
841
4167
736.9
1068.7
944.3
3025
3375
711.4
1315
1002.7
1486
1242
890
2694
635
720.6
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
143
317
851
100
150
486
194
245
200
271
201
22
288
294
238
123
217
231
534
Net
sown
area
25.40
17.10
22.80
0.00
23.60
21.50
31.70
16.90
35.40
16.90
1.70
14.20
2.30
27.30
2.40
7.80
15.30
0.00
Rural
poor
%
51350
51483
Anand
Panchkula
Nainital
Midnapur
(West)
Jagatsingpur
Puri
Ernakulam
Bangalore
Navsari
Gujarat
... 72 ...
Haryana
Uttrakhand
West Bengal
Orissa
Orissa
Kerala
Karnataka
Gujarat
52950
52839
52478
52270
51722
51522
50857
50460
Hatharas
50147
49691
Uttar Pradesh
Jind
Haryana
49688
Alappuzha
Hissar
Haryana
49185
48865
48468
48468
48385
Av.
Prod./
hec
Kerala
Bullandshahr
Dhanbad
Jharkhand
Udhamsigh
Nagar
Thiruvallur
Tamil Nadu
Uttrakhand
Amritsar
Punjab
Uttar Pradesh
District
State
25219
139034
57651
26663
28057
NA
17542
30118
21656
32473
36826
35247
39581
33703
23647
10554
14065
50357
Av.
Prod./
worker
162
121
157
94
63
147
171
NA
319
206
123
289
237
563
276
10
300
313
FERT_
NSA
58
27
61
56
75
59
NA
95
99
45
90
83
99
89
NA
89
98
NIA
%
59
NA
NA
NA
NA
50
NA
79
80
NA
85
84
96
100
NA
79
100
GIA
%
24.5
22.2
29.1
15.5
16.1
11.5
36.3
3.5
17.1
12.8
20.8
0.7
0.8
4.0
5.8
22.1
8.8
1.7
FVA
%
116
104
131
189
188
164
169
191
155
159
135
187
198
171
171
114
139
179
2.10
0.38
0.91
1.96
1.84
NA
2.93
1.70
2.35
1.55
1.36
1.41
1.26
1.46
2.07
4.59
3.45
0.96
1715.4
735
3250
1449.1
1501.3
1650
1528
1282.7
551.8
662.8
3025
429.4
269.8
1256
673.5
1300
1152.8
650
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
147
387
162
138
98
559
48
24
189
148
94
247
313
149
297
34
95
449
Net
sown
area
6.50
6.60
12.50
27.00
37.30
21.8
40.50
NA
13.60
31.50
4.40
14.60
15.20
45.70
14.90
19.30
23.40
8.70
Rural
poor
%
Cuddalore
Bankura
24 Parganas
(South)
Ambala
Namakkal
Bokaro
Sirsa
West Bengal
West Bengal
Haryana
Tamil Nadu
Jharkhand
Haryana
Jalandhar
Punjab
Tamil Nadu
Phulbani
(Kandhamal)
Orissa
Bilaspur
Kasargod
Kerala
Himachal
Pradesh
Kaithal
Haryana
Sonepat
Kolar
Karnataka
Haryana
Faridabad
Haryana
Lucknow
Vaishali
Bihar
Uttar Pradesh
District
State
... 73 ...
54333
54310
54250
54168
54009
53966
53872
53740
53740
53651
53572
53537
53476
53401
53122
53120
53003
Av.
Prod./
hec
73530
3689
19794
74504
21853
19637
17862
13650
28374
21434
76468
29593
114540
44852
24013
27457
11751
Av.
Prod./
worker
255
42
47
312
NA
158
204
75
490
214
399
25
392
138
326
160
FERT_
NSA
82
NA
28
83
NA
96
68
11
100
91
99
12
34
99
21
78
51
NIA
%
86
NA
30
83
NA
NA
62
10
92
84
98
NA
NA
100
23
80
42
GIA
%
0.8
15.3
17.9
2.6
13.5
15.1
11.0
12.4
1.6
17.9
5.7
27.3
27.1
0.5
30.5
2.3
21.7
FVA
%
176
164
127
153
140
131
129
192
190
154
175
154
115
193
103
185
153
0.74
14.72
2.74
0.73
2.47
2.75
3.02
3.94
1.89
2.50
0.70
1.81
0.47
1.19
2.21
1.93
4.51
172.5
1250.0
776.5
999.1
1765
1466
1235.8
946.06
503.5
959.2
1041
1597.1
3480
455.3
641
534.4
1183
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
394
15
164
133
381
343
214
30
147
138
240
118
132
197
358
145
126
Net
sown
area
9.40
52.40
18.50
3.10
18.50
28.50
14.00
6.90
24.50
35.60
0.90
76.60
22.60
12.40
12.90
37.60
41.60
Rural
poor
%
55906
Farrukhabad
... 74 ...
Thrissur
Burdwan
Palakkad
Kozhikode
Mukatsar
Haridwar
Patiala
West Bengal
Kerala
Kerala
Punjab
Uttarakhand
Punjab
Kottayam
Kerala
Kerala
Faridkot
Punjab
Ferozpur
J.B.Phule
Ngr.
Uttar Pradesh
Mansha
Bhatinda
Punjab
Punjab
Theni
Tamil Nadu
Punjab
N.Shahar
Punjab
Uttar Pradesh
55682
Sivhar
Bihar
60818
60561
60394
60376
60175
59664
59129
58906
58604
58143
58046
58028
57613
56960
56807
54937
Guntur
Andhra Pradesh
Av.
Prod./
hec
District
State
69065
40898
74386
103231
29938
25248
51058
67457
75742
72827
56567
32562
67080
18716
62579
27088
10194
22410
Av.
Prod./
worker
399
203
352
102
137
269
138
354
351
147
501
317
344
217
387
360
13
294
FERT_
NSA
96
89
97
35
96
62
97
100
99
85
98
47
90
82
50
46
NIA
%
97
86
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
100
98
NA
98
84
99
50
86
74
33
40
GIA
%
2.5
12.1
1.8
20.9
23.4
10.4
21.0
0.5
1.9
30.5
1.0
5.8
1.9
22.1
2.7
19.9
21.3
3.5
FVA
%
194
144
198
144
159
184
142
191
191
128
197
153
185
107
194
144
161
129
0.88
1.48
0.81
0.58
2.01
2.36
1.16
0.87
0.77
0.80
1.03
1.78
0.86
3.04
0.91
2.06
5.46
2.45
870
1182
779
3185
2363
1314
3097
460
537
3047
460
944.3
460
833.5
1041
795.4
851
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
303
120
224
159
201
462
139
190
475
169
126
171
298
110
95
152
26
598
Net
sown
area
2.60
44.40
28.30
25.30
11.20
20.30
13.10
16.60
17.90
6.90
23.90
4.70
23.10
16.00
1.20
28.50
14.80
3.90
Rural
poor
%
... 75 ...
Dinajpur(South)
Saharanpur
Fatehgarh
Sahib
West
Godavari
Panipat
Sangrur
Yamuna
Nagar
West Bengal
Uttar Pradesh
Punjab
Andhra Pradesh
Haryana
Punjab
Haryana
Birbhum
Koderma
Jharkhand
West Bengal
66022
Moga
Punjab
Malappuram
Surat
Gujarat
Kanya
Kumari
Fatehbad
Haryana
Kerala
East Godavari
Andhra Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
65998
Kapurthala
Punjab
67497
67432
65002
64742
64600
63515
63311
63143
62954
62821
62395
61787
61517
61381
61005
Bijnor
Uttar Pradesh
Av.
Prod./
hec
District
State
31514
54104
61116
78592
74794
41533
23783
92099
40605
29292
9918
66742
35780
55524
21233
88006
40489
Av.
Prod./
worker
210
170
60
436
383
616
488
399
270
199
108
414
210
311
348
375
185
FERT_
NSA
91
35
12
90
100
93
83
100
91
38
NA
100
57
98
64
99
88
NIA
%
NA
41
NA
86
100
95
86
100
90
NA
NA
99
59
96
62
98
86
GIA
%
15.0
27.4
28.1
2.2
1.0
1.8
7.2
1.5
8.3
14.7
28.9
1.8
13.1
0.6
9.2
4.4
1.7
FVA
%
166
114
139
163
198
199
157
187
155
162
122
195
109
186
178
199
132
2.14
1.25
1.08
0.84
0.87
1.56
2.72
0.69
1.56
2.16
6.35
0.94
1.74
1.11
2.90
0.70
1.51
1344
1006
2560
908.6
779
411.9
1152
870
949.3
2083
1019.0
779
1140.8
254.9
1218
708
1108.3
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
316
79
197
125
440
93
429
103
275
191
17
200
424
220
417
136
338
Net
sown
area
39.20
19.80
19.30
7.60
6.20
22.70
4.40
6.20
14.60
48.90
38.10
25.20
23.10
13.20
3.30
4.20
17.90
Rural
poor
%
... 76 ...
Malda
Dinajur(North)
Hooghly
Srinagar
Muzaffarnagar
West Bengal
West Bengal
Jammu &
Kashmir
Uttar Pradesh
24 Parganas
(North)
West Bengal
West Bengal
Midnapur (
East)
Trivandrum
Kerala
West Bengal
Cooch-Behar
West Bengal
Kodagu(Coorg)
Dakshinakannada
Karnataka
Karnataka
Kurkshetra
Haryana
Jalpaiguri
Ludhiana
Punjab
West Bengal
Ghaziabad
Uttar Pradesh
Idukki
Karnal
Haryana
Kerala
District
State
77353
75936
75915
75599
75069
73991
73819
73239
72160
71546
70845
69965
69707
69196
69145
69057
67825
Av.
Prod./
hec
36456
35836
23269
31641
25045
68070
NA
352024
49311
70277
46042
27610
100778
72274
93238
44628
57923
Av.
Prod./
worker
322
121
492
141
234
118
278
182
84
57
265
107
454
479
315
637
FERT_
NSA
99
74
94
48
53
40
36
37
28
55
100
100
93
96
NIA
%
98
76
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
47
95
100
100
98
GIA
%
3.0
25.2
19.4
18.0
15.7
17.1
18.3
5.2
19.3
19.7
33.0
11.8
9.0
2.9
2.5
5.2
1.2
FVA
%
148
127
235
191
197
157
173
101
164
128
130
192
122
182
198
165
197
2.12
2.12
3.26
2.39
3.00
1.09
NA
0.21
1.46
1.02
1.54
2.53
0.69
0.96
0.74
1.55
1.17
758.6
NA
1438
2083
1594
1766
1650
2840
3454
3946
1955
3244
3953
461.2
706
720.2
444.4
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
326
22
222
271
230
642
297
150
339
231
140
255
132
150
306
148
196
Net
sown
area
30.60
6.10
21.10
49.00
46.00
20.60
21.8
29.00
3.40
3.70
11.20
11.20
2.40
8.90
14.90
5.90
Rural
poor
%
Bagpat
Sirmaur
Kollam
Darjeeling
Meerut
Wynad
Uttar Pradesh
Himachal
Pradesh
Kerala
West Bengal
Uttar Pradesh
Kerala
Nadia
Solan
Kinnaur
The Nilgiris
Kulu
Howrah
Simla
Lahaul &
Spiti
West Bengal
Himachal
Pradesh
Himachal
Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Himachal
Pradesh
West Bengal
Himachal
Pradesh
Himachal
Pradesh
Murshidabad
Pathanamthitta
Kerala
West Bengal
District
State
... 77 ...
150453
135950
114815
102052
98679
97104
95329
88997
87826
82604
81855
81617
79182
78552
78106
77809
Av.
Prod./
hec
749
89.0
NA
21
93
NA
148
82
322
246
46
68
324
51
FERT_
NSA
39684
91.0
37116 123.0
45369
21721
125222
22635
24710
38968
38160
65758
48990
83317
62197
19108
38160
57362
Av.
Prod./
worker
91
31
91
NA
60
25
NA
57
95
18
34
95
NIA
%
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
61
29
NA
NA
NA
100
NA
NA
34
100
NA
GIA
%
86.6
53.1
25.4
37.5
50.9
86.0
19.2
9.3
10.3
31.4
6.5
37.9
36.5
26.0
1.8
43.1
FVA
%
104
141
217
179
100
117
164
260
239
177
154
123
135
183
159
129
3.79
3.66
2.53
4.70
0.79
4.29
3.86
2.28
2.30
1.26
1.67
0.98
1.27
4.11
2.05
1.36
483.38
957.22
1501
900.44
1695.7
612.8
852.4
1386
1366
3622
720.2
3088
2729
1245.74
720.2
3087
Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
Intensity hectare
mm
68
86
36
79
39
304
404
117
199
143
140
41
111
90
Net
sown
area
NA
21.60
NA
7.00
4.70
55.90
22.20
6.50
14.70
7.00
7.70
28.20
5.20
Rural
poor
%
... 78 ...
Kurnool
Mahaboobnagar
Medak
Nalgonda
Nellore
Nizamabad
Prakasam
Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Krishna
Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Khammam
Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Karimnagar
Andhra Pradesh
Cuddapah
Andhra Pradesh
Guntur
Chittoor
Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Anantpur
Andhra Pradesh
East Godavari
Adilabad
Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
District
State
28885
42167
37897
26876
24232
15704
22115
44069
36108
34577
54937
61517
28315
32794
16477
19436
Prod./
ha
15504
13208
15379
12317
11719
8342
16183
17977
17335
12034
22410
21233
15199
10657
13914
15431
Prod./
worker
145
371
240
206
96
87
149
352
172
296
294
348
117
108
56
74
23
58
73
32
25
18
17
65
38
57
46
64
31
34
11
15
23
61
72
38
29
22
19
51
40
62
40
62
34
40
13
15
6.4
4.0
14.8
12.1
4.3
4.8
5.3
13.0
10.7
4.4
3.5
9.2
9.8
19.3
4.3
5.9
110
150
110
116
126
108
109
143
109
134
129
178
115
110
105
102
1.86
3.19
2.46
2.18
2.07
1.88
1.37
2.45
2.08
2.87
2.45
2.90
1.86
3.08
1.18
1.26
872
1036
1080
751
874
604
670
1034
1124
967
851
1218
700
935
553
1157
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
Worker/ Rainfall:
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
NPK
%
/ha.
Annex II
Per hectare productivity in various districts of india arranged in alphabetic
orders of various states, alongwith other salient characteristics
565
206
308
495
423
708
873
445
430
357
598
417
397
378
1018
546
9.90
23.10
14.10
5.40
9.30
11.80
24.60
2.80
13.10
7.20
3.90
3.30
5.40
15.90
20.20
26.10
Net Rural
sown poor
area:
%
000ha
Lower Subansiri
Paumpare
Tawang
Tirap
Arunachal
Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
Changlang
Arunachal
Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
West Godavari
Andhra Pradesh
Lohit
Warangal
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
Vizianagarm
Andhra Pradesh
East Siang
Visakhapatnam
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
Srikakulam
Andhra Pradesh
East Kameng
Rangareddy
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
District
State
... 79 ...
8196
25485
31194
13767
33754
18702
15396
18945
64600
33895
31851
31855
28711
27508
Prod./
ha
NA
10605
16540
NA
17489
24335
6206
6566
23783
14531
12517
11267
10550
12087
Prod./
worker
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
488
216
97
94
136
411
13
22
17
14
57
19
32
83
61
42
31
59
21
10
13
59
12
23
86
59
37
33
47
26
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7.2
4.1
12.3
11.3
4.8
11.6
133
177
218
131
190
101
168
141
157
125
135
127
137
110
NA
2.40
1.89
NA
1.93
0.77
2.48
2.89
2.72
2.33
2.54
2.83
2.72
2.28
1152
993
1131
1202
1162
781
14
18
20
25
16
429
458
315
302
302
253
4.40
0.90
4.70
18.90
6.00
10.90
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
Worker/ Rainfall: Net Rural
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
District
Upper Siang
Upper
Subansiri
West Kameng
West Siang
Barpeta
Bongaigaon
Cachar
Darrang
Dhemaji
Dhubri
Dibrugarh
Goalpara
Golaghat
Hailakandi
Jorhat
Kamrup
State
Arunachal
Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
Arunachal
Pradesh
Assam
Assam
Assam
Assam
... 80 ...
Assam
Assam
Assam
Assam
Assam
Assam
Assam
Assam
25674
29632
34515
33595
26513
24931
23955
20099
23248
29728
24856
26316
9969
16008
14431
16159
Prod./
ha
16338
18585
17890
17444
13930
19667
11983
6200
14343
21491
14181
16148
8687
5889
7261
8001
Prod./
worker
81
59
30
31
116
55
118
87
44
106
93
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
27
19
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
23
16
9.3
12.6
11.7
14.2
10.3
9.1
7.7
7.8
10.2
14.8
8.5
11.3
NA
NA
NA
140
143
141
128
137
129
153
162
143
127
165
154
120
150
121
1.57
1.59
1.93
1.93
1.90
1.27
2.00
3.24
1.62
1.38
1.75
1.63
1.15
2.72
1.99
1428.6
1803.7
3094.2
2118.6
2458.7
2249.7
3225.2
3471.7
1796.6
2366.1
3219.4
1909.1
180
120
46
117
79
138
144
63
205
115
95
180
24
22.30
27.50
7.00
25.50
33.90
19.20
42.40
0.00
0.10
33.50
33.00
39.90
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
NA
58
33 NA
177
2.02
6
Tinsukia
Araria
Arval
Aurangabad
Banka
Begusarai
Bhabhua
Bhagalpur
Bhojpur
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Nagaon
Assam
Assam
N C Hills
Assam
Sonitpur
Morigon
Assam
Assam
Lakhimpur
Assam
Nalbari
Kokrajhar
Assam
Sibsagar
Karimganj
Assam
Assam
Karbi-Anglong
Assam
Assam
District
State
... 81 ...
23144
30944
28537
41743
22787
25023
23959
17399
27805
26405
26683
23830
31306
43716
19645
22188
25176
29037
24433
Prod./
ha
8733
7520
11948
9844
6392
9217
NA
4258
15765
14776
19728
18504
17289
32482
9468
5913
9419
16638
12779
Prod./
worker
207
173
78
274
22
123
NA
76
54
29
11
74
109
65
17
70
60
65
40
75
69
58
81
79
38
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
82
46
82
52
69
78
81
38
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.6
13.7
5.8
14.2
10.0
6.7
6.9
4.3
13.8
9.4
7.4
10.1
9.3
30.2
4.3
7.7
7.8
9.2
112
121
128
145
105
123
130
156
142
147
111
137
151
127
135
172
160
140
2.65
4.11
2.39
4.24
3.56
2.71
NA
4.09
1.76
1.79
1.35
1.29
1.81
1.35
2.07
3.75
2.67
1.75
1079
1146
1118
1153
1817
2609.6
1646.1
1900.8
1904.4
1541.7
1144.9
1165.8
1544.6
3767.7
4559.9
184
142
153
117
153
197
41
182
99
166
138
154
235
28
92
100
85
69
41.60
45.20
42.00
56.70
59.80
55.40
54.60
14.40
3.60
20.30
15.00
25.30
6.10
21.50
1.40
35.70
40.90
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
6
NA NA
5.0
154
1.91
1121.5
126 26.50
Kishanganj
Lakhisarai
Madhubani
Madhupura
Monghyr
Muzafarpur
Nalanda
Nawadha
Patna
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Bihar
Jahanabad
Bihar
Bihar
Gopalganj
Bihar
Khagaria
Gaya
Bihar
Bihar
Darbhanga
Bihar
Katihar
Champaran(West)
Bihar
Jamui
Champaran(East)
Bihar
Bihar
Buxar
Bihar
Bihar
District
State
... 82 ...
32367
27160
33303
41428
36570
42908
18270
16776
24416
39959
35215
17640
22617
26178
20364
33639
25038
23708
23632
Prod./
ha
8448
5104
8560
10564
9022
9040
4019
4794
9063
8921
7678
2950
3809
7504
3645
7472
7232
6586
10501
Prod./
worker
170
97
166
190
63
112
31
83
18
329
62
118
181
48
193
141
158
128
60
73
63
53
66
62
45
61
23
85
46
34
84
66
74
44
35
42
70
85
84
39
62
65
44
68
26
64
48
39
82
47
83
50
48
48
12.8
10.6
15.2
14.3
12.5
12.8
7.4
3.8
6.7
10.4
11.4
8.5
7.1
8.1
7.7
16.7
8.6
9.9
118
122
124
164
139
156
141
121
149
157
164
109
124
154
122
120
134
114
3.83
5.32
3.89
3.92
4.05
4.75
4.55
3.50
2.69
4.48
4.59
5.98
5.94
3.49
5.59
4.50
3.46
3.60
1110
1069
1250
956
1414
2422
1179
1492
1095
1187
1095
1258
1216
1253
206
102
181
207
47
129
225
64
130
84
164
78
63
150
179
172
281
294
44.70
38.80
44.80
65.30
35.60
7.70
59.20
38.60
62.30
16.70
36.50
46.30
54.20
27.40
37.50
42.20
76.90
20.10
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
96
65
79
8.0
111
2.25
139 54.20
Vaishali
Bastar
Bilaspur
Dantewara
Dhamtari
Durg
Janjgir-Champa
Jashpur
Kanker
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Sitamarhi
Bihar
Bihar
Sheikhpura
Bihar
Supaul
Saran
Bihar
Bihar
Samastipur
Bihar
Siwan
Saharsa
Bihar
Sivhar
Rohtas
Bihar
Bihar
Purnea
Bihar
Bihar
District
State
... 83 ...
16349
11108
15406
22068
26627
9017
23524
11970
53003
22631
21261
55682
33042
25112
26790
30554
40025
32321
24008
Prod./
ha
11374
7942
8411
16190
12675
7780
13775
7588
11751
5201
6321
10194
5717
6174
8167
6729
8718
14968
6232
Prod./
worker
41
12
138
76
205
97
12
160
48
73
13
111
177
82
188
91
151
52
36
74
38
51
60
61
50
45
82
55
54
52
99
49
30
51
30
42
54
45
33
38
75
51
45
50
90
3.3
3.0
2.7
4.0
5.5
0.9
7.0
1.4
21.7
3.9
7.7
21.3
12.0
8.5
9.7
14.2
10.3
5.4
107
106
117
142
159
101
131
103
153
173
148
161
144
129
121
137
177
139
1.44
1.40
1.83
1.36
2.10
1.16
1.71
1.58
4.51
4.35
3.36
5.46
5.78
4.07
3.28
4.54
4.59
2.16
1335
1447
1165.4
1064.1
1223.6
1283.3
1089.6
1358.5
1183
1154
1294
1168
1173
1525
1142
207
250
262
550
134
290
368
351
126
151
163
26
117
38
193
185
108
254
53.10
35.00
29.80
35.50
38.50
88.20
34.80
80.60
41.60
20.00
30.20
14.80
28.10
28.60
55.90
52.30
21.10
34.60
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
191
43
56
8.5
137
3.85
1483
216 29.00
Mahasmund
Raigarh
Raipur
Rajnandgaon
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
... 84 ...
Amreli
Anand
Banas Kantha
Bhavnagar
Broach
Dahod
Dangs
Gandhinagar
Jamnagar
Junagarh
Gujarat
Gujarat
Gujarat
Gujarat
Gujarat
Gujarat
Gujarat
Gujarat
Gujarat
Gujarat
Ahmedabad
Koriya
Chhattisgarh
Gujarat
Korba
Chhattisgarh
Surguja
Kawardha
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
District
State
44403
32233
31739
11759
14933
32827
28001
27577
50857
24327
19301
14244
13334
13247
16094
13277
15071
15900
11358
Prod./
ha
36946
56677
23406
8282
4700
34619
37014
28275
21656
34780
26903
8039
9246
9156
9399
10211
7968
7584
8263
Prod./
worker
133
84
113
37
96
97
94
319
80
96
41
53
91
90
74
24
16
33
20
59
27
31
35
48
95
19
34
18
48
19
24
32
22
57
25
32
35
46
79
21
38
16
40
19
23
7.5
2.4
10.2
4.0
1.6
6.5
10.3
4.8
17.1
3.0
3.8
5.1
1.6
0.5
5.9
0.7
5.7
6.9
128
113
122
104
141
102
111
139
155
105
110
116
125
122
112
110
112
107
1.20
0.57
1.36
1.42
3.18
0.95
0.76
0.98
2.35
0.70
0.72
1.77
1.44
1.45
1.71
1.30
1.89
2.10
720.6
589.6
541.8
2262.6
583.6
770.6
521.2
462
551.8
479.4
621
1391.6
1108.3
944.4
1259.7
2226.2
1377.8
1465.2
534
609
164
56
212
332
561
744
189
547
509
483
360
549
281
267
106
133
0.00
0.00
5.20
88.40
41.40
17.10
1.20
26.00
13.60
0.50
11.30
49.70
58.60
31.20
23.60
21.40
49.70
22.70
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
48
20
19
1.3
128
1.37
712.2
185 16.90
Surat
Surendranagar
Vadodara
Valsad
Ambala
Bhiwani
Faridabad
Fatehbad
Gurgaon
Gujarat
Gujarat
Gujarat
Haryana
Haryana
Haryana
Haryana
Haryana
Patan
Gujarat
Gujarat
Panch Mahals
Gujarat
Sabarkantha
Navsari
Gujarat
Gujarat
Narmada
Gujarat
Porbander
Mahesana
Gujarat
Rajkot
Kutch
Gujarat
Gujarat
Kheda
Gujarat
Gujarat
District
State
... 85 ...
39511
61787
53120
32936
54168
31832
25405
21618
62395
23600
38607
34721
14263
11538
52950
37723
26424
17569
29243
Prod./
ha
26297
55524
27457
33566
74504
15108
16217
37711
35780
17788
66835
37862
16186
4185
25219
20449
23245
NA
17006
Prod./
worker
166
311
326
98
312
106
132
78
210
151
139
37
50
123
162
52
109
52
52
98
78
67
83
28
41
16
57
32
28
16
27
16
58
23
57
26
68
96
80
50
83
29
44
18
59
33
30
17
30
17
59
25
55
31
1.7
0.6
2.3
0.3
2.6
30.7
7.6
2.3
13.1
5.3
2.7
4.4
1.5
1.8
24.5
7.5
9.0
4.8
174
186
185
198
153
111
110
105
109
119
114
112
109
108
116
108
128
107
1.50
1.11
1.93
0.98
0.73
2.11
1.57
0.57
1.74
1.33
0.58
0.92
0.88
2.76
2.10
1.84
1.14
NA
484.9
254.9
534.4
314.3
999.1
1769.4
686.2
470.6
1140.8
567.6
489.4
431.8
393
690.6
1715.4
775
632.8
312.4
169
220
145
399
133
161
516
702
424
447
763
119
387
276
147
111
349
680
6.20
13.20
37.60
18.30
3.10
3.40
5.60
20.50
23.10
20.20
10.40
0.00
42.40
38.30
6.50
24.50
27.30
20.00
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
193
65
63
8.5
130
1.72
668.4
310 42.40
Kaithal
Karnal
Kurkshetra
Mahendra Garh
Haryana
Haryana
Haryana
Haryana
... 86 ...
Rewari
Rohtak
Sirsa
Sonepat
Yamuna Nagar
Bilaspur
Chamba
Hamirpur
Haryana
Haryana
Haryana
Haryana
Haryana
Himachal
Pradesh
Himachal
Pradesh
Himachal
Pradesh
Panipat
Jind
Haryana
Haryana
Jhajjer
Haryana
Panchkula
Hissar
Haryana
Haryana
District
State
36719
33030
53740
65998
53740
54333
35230
26501
64742
51350
30652
69196
67825
53401
49691
29143
49688
Prod./
ha
8778
8146
13650
78592
28374
73530
26338
17473
41533
30118
20125
72274
57923
44852
35247
19807
39581
Prod./
worker
78
27
75
436
490
255
237
184
616
NA
156
454
637
392
289
145
14
11
90
100
82
78
86
93
NA
79
100
96
99
90
81
10
10
86
92
86
82
80
95
NA
53
95
98
100
85
78
7.9
19.5
12.4
2.2
1.6
0.8
0.7
0.4
1.8
3.5
0.3
2.9
1.2
0.5
0.7
0.5
199
158
192
163
190
176
155
154
199
191
173
182
197
193
187
151
4.18
4.05
3.94
0.84
1.89
0.74
1.34
1.52
1.56
1.70
1.52
0.96
1.17
1.19
1.41
1.47
1242.42
1637.46
946.06
908.6
503.5
172.5
454
409
411.9
1282.7
310.9
461.2
444.4
455.3
429.4
776.4
35
42
30
125
147
394
142
128
93
24
152
150
196
197
247
154
6.30
20.70
6.90
7.60
24.50
9.40
6.00
16.80
22.70
NA
8.40
2.40
5.90
12.40
14.60
6.60
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
237
83
84
0.8
198
1.26
269.8
313 15.20
Solan
Una
Anantnagh
Baramulla
Budgam
Himachal
Pradesh
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu &
Kashmir
Mandi
Himachal
Pradesh
Himachal
Pradesh
Lahaul & Spiti
Himachal
Pradesh
Sirmaur
Kulu
Himachal
Pradesh
Himachal
Pradesh
Kinnaur
Himachal
Pradesh
Simla
Kangra
Himachal
Pradesh
Himachal
Pradesh
District
State
... 87 ...
27617
20562
28630
40568
95329
78552
135950
44401
150453
102052
97104
43128
Prod./
ha
8443
16199
10524
11807
24710
19108
37116
11302
39684
21721
22635
13464
Prod./
worker
193
102
199
165
93
68
123.0
76
91.0
89.0
21
56
47
59
23
25
34
31
16
91
60
60
50
71
21
29
34
NA
16
NA
NA
61
7.4
27.2
13.0
8.6
19.2
26.0
53.1
20.6
86.6
37.5
86.0
109
115
128
192
164
183
141
187
104
179
117
3.27
1.27
2.72
3.44
3.86
4.11
3.66
3.93
3.79
4.70
4.29
585
1270
NA
1171.44
852.4
1245.74
957.22
1290.36
483.38
900.44
612.8
52
82
76
37
39
41
68
86
36
2.90
6.00
0.00
6.10
4.70
7.70
10.00
NA
NA
7.00
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
77
31
30 17.4
188
3.20
1581.32
117 11.40
29191
Jammu
Kargil
Kathua
Kupwara
Leh
Poonch
Pulwanna
Rajouri
Srinagar
Udhampur
Bokaro
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu &
Kashmir
... 88 ...
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu &
Kashmir
Jharkhand
54310
19385
75936
27782
38220
21689
15367
12406
29922
8473
11034
Doda
Jammu &
Kashmir
Prod./
ha
District
State
3689
5773
35836
9668
18244
4229
6316
4202
16415
3021
21370
3348
Prod./
worker
42
40
121
45
203
54
20
88
47
19
119
22
NA
74
14
63
13
83
44
34
100
52
11
NA
76
70
14
100
43
34
100
51
10
15.3
0.3
25.2
0.1
29.5
0.1
6.0
21.9
0.2
5.6
0.6
0.8
164
161
127
185
147
167
103
105
196
110
179
127
14.72
3.36
2.12
2.87
2.09
5.13
2.43
2.95
1.82
2.80
1.37
3.30
1250.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100
NA
1672
100
NA
NA
15
70
22
53
56
27
10
43
63
119
66
52.40
9.30
6.10
0.00
13.10
5.00
1.80
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
... 89 ...
Hazaribagh
East
Singhbhum
Jamtara
Koderma
Jharkhand
Jharkhand
Jharkhand
Jharkhand
Ranchi
Gumla
Jharkhand
Jharkhand
Godda
Jharkhand
Palamau
Giridih
Jharkhand
Jharkhand
Garhwa
Jharkhand
Pakaur
Dumka
Jharkhand
Jharkhand
Dhanbad
Jharkhand
Latehar
Deogarh
Jharkhand
Lohardaga
Chatra
Jharkhand
Jharkhand
West
Singhbhum
Jharkhand
Jharkhand
District
State
29817
25626
27766
32201
26795
62954
27922
33423
30972
13442
31070
40076
27448
29643
48468
27229
37014
24460
Prod./
ha
11041
5091
7721
11382
NA
9918
NA
8690
6625
5019
7027
6407
5152
6758
10554
6081
6740
6438
Prod./
worker
108
43
40
139
108
64
111
10
142
49
50
47
10
119
73
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
12.3
8.9
10.9
12.3
8.7
28.9
9.3
8.2
12.4
3.1
8.8
14.6
8.1
8.4
22.1
10.3
16.3
105
120
107
112
121
122
105
175
111
103
107
120
136
104
114
104
111
2.70
5.03
3.60
2.83
NA
6.35
NA
3.85
4.67
2.68
4.42
6.25
5.33
4.39
4.59
4.48
5.49
1530
1237
1355.0
1411
NA
1019.0
NA
1300
1319
1100
1282
1145
NA
1391
1300
1242
NA
253
126
58
44
60
17
55
83
104
215
77
77
64
145
34
63
45
23.20
54.30
75.60
81.60
NA
38.10
NA
58.40
28.30
68.60
41.30
30.50
38.60
55.40
19.30
58.70
55.20
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
13
NA NA
7.8
109
3.80
1314
176 53.80
... 90 ...
Dakshinakannada
Devanagrre
Dharwad
Gadag
Gulbarga
Hassan
Haveri
Karnataka
Karnataka
Karnataka
Karnataka
Karnataka
Karnataka
Chitradurga
Karnataka
Karnataka
Chikmagalur
Bellary
Karnataka
Karnataka
Belgaum
Karnataka
Chamrajnagar
Bangalore
Karnataka
Karnataka
Bagalkot
Karnataka
Bijapur
Simdega
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Saraikela
Jharkhand
Bidar
Sahibganj
Jharkhand
Karnataka
District
State
17878
23471
11183
8466
10492
26574
69707
18205
27846
23067
8664
13494
18510
19801
52839
14628
16061
18805
30103
Prod./
ha
12773
14892
14559
10050
9408
18794
100778
14305
30513
11922
13280
14182
13003
11940
139034
13479
NA
NA
4916
Prod./
worker
87
128
65
41
73
139
107
48
131
100
45
37
227
118
121
104
110
16
22
14
19
12
35
55
18
11
28
21
11
36
43
43
NA
NA
NA
14
21
15
15
39
47
18
11
26
20
38
38
41
NA
NA
NA
5.4
12.9
0.9
6.0
9.9
3.7
9.0
5.5
10.1
5.0
2.6
1.4
2.9
4.5
22.2
3.9
3.7
4.0
9.5
125
117
119
129
152
117
122
118
109
121
116
122
117
128
104
115
106
108
116
1.40
1.58
0.77
0.84
1.12
1.41
0.69
1.27
0.91
1.93
0.65
0.95
1.42
1.66
0.38
1.09
NA
NA
6.12
753
1247
777
612
772
595
3953
472
2061
696
578
891
613
835
735
567
1316
355
384
1183
380
328
364
132
409
282
165
780
368
433
781
387
433
82
60
41
55.10
5.10
39.40
6.40
9.70
42.20
11.20
24.80
2.00
13.80
20.00
31.00
40.00
12.00
6.60
18.10
63.70
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
Alappuzha
Ernakulam
Idukki
Kannur
Kasargod
Kollam
Kottayam
Kozhikode
Malappuram
Kerala
Kerala
Kerala
Kerala
Kerala
Kerala
Kerala
Kerala
Shimoga
Karnataka
Kerala
Raichur
Karnataka
Uttarakannada
Mysore
Karnataka
Karnataka
Mandya
Karnataka
Tumkur
Koppal
Karnataka
Udupi
Kolar
Karnataka
Karnataka
Kodagu(Coorg)
Karnataka
Karnataka
District
State
... 91 ...
66022
60376
58143
79182
53476
46336
71546
52478
50147
32732
47718
19500
44492
11073
35957
44446
15246
53122
73239
Prod./
ha
61116
103231
72827
62197
114540
61057
70277
57651
36826
15560
NA
12201
21768
12071
18472
16527
13412
24013
352024
Prod./
worker
60
102
147
46
25
50
84
157
123
83
59
52
203
161
135
206
132
138
12
34
10
27
45
20
32
22
56
26
36
49
31
21
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
19
27
22
59
27
28
50
31
23
28.1
20.9
30.5
36.5
27.1
32.6
19.7
29.1
20.8
3.7
10.8
2.9
3.7
1.9
2.7
10.6
2.4
30.5
139
144
128
135
115
129
128
131
135
110
123
106
112
112
150
119
129
103
1.08
0.58
0.80
1.27
0.47
0.76
1.02
0.91
1.36
2.10
NA
1.60
2.04
0.92
1.95
2.69
1.14
2.21
2560
3185
3047
2729
3480
3375
3946
3250
3025
2836
4167
541
2694
616
739
635
577
641
197
159
169
140
132
200
231
162
94
108
100
574
217
581
334
231
356
358
19.30
25.30
6.90
7.00
22.60
35.40
3.40
12.50
4.40
47.60
0.00
20.60
7.80
59.20
14.20
15.30
3.70
12.90
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
5.2
101
0.21
2840
150
Trivandrum
Wynad
Kerala
Kerala
82604
70845
59129
... 92 ...
21210
13707
17263
25753
20151
Madhya Pradesh Chindwara
Madhya Pradesh Damoh
Madhya Pradesh Datia
Madhya Pradesh Dewas
Madhya Pradesh Dhar
NA
40855
21219
Madhya Pradesh Bhopal
15058
16021
Madhya Pradesh Bhind
Madhya Pradesh Burhanpur
13898
Madhya Pradesh Betul
Madhya Pradesh Chhatarpur
23943
12001
Madhya Pradesh Barwani
15373
22198
13987
15187
17697
13265
13846
11378
6287
14817
6837
NA
NA
65758
46042
51058
57362
29938
Prod./
worker
Madhya Pradesh Balaghat
11381
Thrissur
Kerala
77809
Madhya Pradesh Ashok Nagar
Pathanamthitta
Kerala
60175
6491
Palakkad
Kerala
Prod./
ha
Madhya Pradesh Anuppur
District
State
119
86
56
33
48
66
27
94
80
45
82
57
18
82
57
138
51
137
45
41
58
34
23
54
31
51
33
25
32
44
30
62
35
32
27
50
27
20
43
35
36
31
19
28
40
25
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.7
1.5
0.8
0.8
3.3
1.6
15.9
1.6
0.6
1.2
1.5
1.0
0.2
0.5
31.4
33.0
21.0
43.1
23.4
139
151
118
127
123
126
113
142
108
132
116
124
122
120
177
130
142
129
159
1.31
1.16
1.23
0.90
1.20
1.14
NA
0.89
1.16
1.22
1.91
2.17
NA
NA
1.26
1.54
1.16
1.36
2.01
915
1079
973
1218
1094
1044
497
1211
1148
1129
1474
676
910
3622
1955
3097
3087
2363
506
385
200
310
484
394
104
153
329
401
232
263
306
162
117
140
139
90
201
23.90
17.70
14.70
49.00
30.90
52.80
14.10
34.50
16.40
53.70
6.30
53.50
22.20
3.70
13.10
5.20
11.20
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
14751
8801
21412
22755
24634
27190
8556
14230
18644
Madhya Pradesh Mandla
Madhya Pradesh Mandsaur
Madhya Pradesh Morena
Madhya Pradesh Narsimpur
Madhya Pradesh Neemach
Madhya Pradesh Panna
Madhya Pradesh Raisen
Madhya Pradesh Rajgarh
20541
Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Madhya Pradesh Khargaon
33077
Madhya Pradesh Indore
13804
25269
Madhya Pradesh Hoshangabad
Madhya Pradesh Khandwa
24288
Madhya Pradesh Harda
9769
23092
Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
12393
13659
Madhya Pradesh Guna
Madhya Pradesh Jhabua
7701
Madhya Pradesh Dindori
Madhya Pradesh Katni
Prod./
ha
District
State
... 93 ...
15321
20768
7236
19375
24048
15009
16731
4852
NA
NA
8762
5495
17571
30322
30582
24482
22605
8345
5269
Prod./
worker
58
62
30
114
47
113
83
21
114
112
73
55
83
169
164
138
119
58
40
42
33
34
56
62
31
42
35
30
16
36
57
85
76
55
39
28
36
28
23
43
51
22
36
28
26
14
30
34
51
44
56
30
0.6
0.4
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.5
1.1
0.6
0.9
2.2
1.9
0.6
4.1
4.6
1.2
0.2
1.2
0.2
141
117
116
147
132
124
140
129
116
125
133
117
137
166
167
175
125
130
1.22
0.69
1.18
1.40
1.02
1.52
1.28
1.81
NA
NA
1.41
1.78
1.17
1.09
0.83
0.99
1.02
1.64
1157
1595
1186
749
1690
927
962
1425
888
961
1025
768
1447
1054
1385
916
900
1222
421
431
248
187
302
266
357
218
409
312
198
360
275
259
297
173
209
326
11.90
58.10
49.60
0.20
36.60
20.80
15.50
73.70
4.70
14.10
48.90
56.90
33.30
21.80
37.20
37.20
20.50
16.60
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
4
1
1
0.1
133
1.46
1481
205 72.00
... 94 ...
20891
22654
7084
15478
9921
Madhya Pradesh Tikamgarh
Madhya Pradesh Ujjain
Madhya Pradesh Umaria
Madhya Pradesh Vidisha
Ahmednagar
Akola
Amravati
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
11076
20903
12661
9336
8046
Madhya Pradesh Shahdol
Madhya Pradesh Sidhi
13062
Madhya Pradesh Seoni
18397
23051
Madhya Pradesh Sehore
Madhya Pradesh Shivpuri
12701
Madhya Pradesh Satna
20239
15399
Madhya Pradesh Sagar
23165
11718
Madhya Pradesh Rewa
Madhya Pradesh Shajapur
25030
Madhya Pradesh Ratlam
Madhya Pradesh Sheopur Kala
Prod./
ha
District
State
9935
19783
12270
8114
24546
4569
21675
11546
5368
13775
19445
17863
2797
10105
24004
9308
18790
6435
20192
Prod./
worker
106
52
79
93
53
21
89
73
24
46
93
63
26
25
73
70
39
58
22
25
43
18
44
73
17
47
67
43
26
57
37
39
24
24
10
28
34
14
28
56
13
36
57
29
21
37
28
29
19
0.4
5.9
2.4
3.0
0.3
0.7
1.3
2.0
0.9
0.5
0.5
1.7
0.8
0.8
0.4
1.8
1.3
1.0
116
106
110
109
126
130
158
153
136
132
123
149
116
128
157
133
135
135
1.11
1.06
1.03
1.22
0.63
1.55
1.05
1.81
1.74
1.34
1.19
1.13
2.88
1.29
0.96
1.36
0.82
1.82
786
976
878
676
1331
1093
1088
1100
1174
1179
730
1117
1335
1447
1169
1138
1395
1079
692
751
436
1103
534
108
489
255
358
405
157
452
176
366
383
360
536
371
46.50
39.50
23.40
10.30
51.30
76.40
28.90
44.10
57.60
38.70
37.60
29.00
64.40
60.00
39.10
19.80
55.70
43.10
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
93
33
23
0.7
144
1.24
1078
330 17.10
Nandurbar
Nagpur
Nanded
Nasik
Osmanabad
Parbhani
Pune
Raigad
Ratnagiri
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Jalgaon
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Gadchiroli
Maharashtra
Latur
Dhule
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Chandrapur
Maharashtra
Jalna
Buldhana
Maharashtra
Kolhapur
Bhandara
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
Beed
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
District
State
... 95 ...
46345
28952
28935
15125
9391
33750
21311
24590
12357
13139
34446
12661
47868
13644
11921
16986
12364
25893
9796
Prod./
ha
22017
11917
22069
14901
8582
21206
16464
22217
7274
10843
15068
12791
35601
5500
9633
12213
9949
23995
9791
Prod./
worker
32
69
101
85
30
130
86
127
86
70
202
98
157
73
108
79
88
61
25
11
21
21
11
20
24
16
17
28
12
20
53
27
16
24
13
23
29
17
19
31
14
22
48
32.8
4.7
8.4
1.2
0.6
10.1
1.6
8.0
NA
0.9
2.1
2.3
5.9
1.0
1.9
1.4
0.8
3.8
121
103
114
167
160
108
113
107
111
134
102
116
108
113
105
115
107
138
2.10
2.43
1.31
1.02
1.09
1.59
1.29
1.11
1.70
1.21
2.29
0.99
1.34
2.48
1.24
1.39
1.24
1.08
3025
2655
715
905
809
591
915
1242
891
1137
1472
841
1574
738
1474
901
1349
245
188
946
490
481
877
705
547
296
521
428
579
851
169
435
451
676
362
16.90
26.60
6.70
52.20
10.30
48.00
42.80
39.30
49.40
53.90
8.40
35.80
22.80
65.00
38.20
30.10
31.00
51.20
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
64
27
30
1.9
113
1.00
685
762 55.00
Jainta Hills
Ri Bhoi
South Garo
Hills
West Garo Hills
Aizwal
Chhimtuipui
Kolasib
Lunglei
Meghalaya
Meghalaya
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Mizoram
Mizoram
Mizoram
Washim
Maharashtra
Meghalaya
Wardha
Maharashtra
East Khasi Hills
Thane
Maharashtra
Meghalaya
Solapur
Maharashtra
East Garo Hills
Sindhudurg
Maharashtra
Meghalaya
Satara
Maharashtra
Yavatmal
Sangli
Maharashtra
Maharashtra
District
State
... 96 ...
18658
21190
23443
18802
22942
17375
34485
23381
45669
23013
13601
11950
23779
30163
14677
36378
21327
23091
Prod./
ha
4239
12478
6061
4843
10220
8760
11664
7583
12969
8169
12939
11530
22341
10271
13499
18770
12375
15873
Prod./
worker
26
22
22
34
15
175
65
53
61
78
67
47
92
118
36
36
10
81
20
33
19
20
18
34
20
40
40
11
10
84
30
31
27
23
20
36
20
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.5
NA
2.2
3.2
3.1
32.2
4.9
2.6
100
100
100
100
130
124
111
101
126
117
105
112
119
117
112
115
116
121
4.40
1.70
3.87
3.88
2.24
1.98
2.96
3.08
3.52
2.82
1.05
1.04
1.06
2.94
1.09
1.94
1.72
1.45
1133
1144
2617
743
2493
1119
571
11
13
13
17
68
18
23
31
22
32
849
379
365
245
1027
140
539
596
42.10
23.80
20.90
40.30
11.00
2.30
4.90
17.50
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
Angul
Balasore
Bhadrak
Bolangir
Boudh
Buragarh
Cuttack
Deogarh
Dhenkanal
Orissa
Orissa
Orissa
Orissa
Orissa
Orissa
Orissa
Orissa
Phek
Nagaland
Orissa
Mon
Nagaland
Zunheboto
Mokokchun
Nagaland
Nagaland
Kohima
Nagaland
Wokha
Denapur
Nagaland
Thensang
Saiha
Mizoram
Nagaland
Mamit
Mizoram
Nagaland
District
State
... 97 ...
42838
26474
41344
20960
41681
21428
33815
28711
41929
18771
17715
14354
17191
16096
14333
18836
21377
17004
20315
Prod./
ha
33529
17234
19857
25594
27019
17874
13184
15481
31616
18027
16131
4220
12615
4326
5867
8725
39347
8409
10873
Prod./
worker
31
41
73
129
45
30
125
36
23
25
57
39
44
44
NA
21
10
10
12
35
13
28
39
11
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
16
20
15
37
17
19
31
49
13
21.4
14.2
14.5
3.1
18.3
9.2
14.4
13.3
24.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
166
156
190
135
151
132
134
136
169
126
126
116
119
124
128
117
124
100
1.28
1.54
2.08
0.82
1.54
1.20
2.56
1.85
1.33
1.04
1.10
3.40
1.36
3.72
2.44
2.16
0.54
2.02
1421.1
1527
1501.3
1527
1597.1
1443.5
1568.4
1568.4
1421.1
167
65
165
320
87
334
175
234
199
28
34
47
39
31
30
37
62
10
57.10
73.40
14.00
61.70
70.50
66.30
22.90
28.30
53.00
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
20
23 NA
100
1.87
11
... 98 ...
Nawapara
Naworangpur
Nayagarh
Phulbani
('Kandhamal)
Puri
Rayagada
Orissa
Orissa
Orissa
Orissa
Orissa
Mayurbhanj
Orissa
Orissa
Malkangiri
Kedrapara
Orissa
Orissa
Kalahandi
Orissa
Koraput
Jharsugda
Orissa
Orissa
Jajpur
Orissa
Khurda
Jagatsingpur
Orissa
Orissa
Ganjam
Orissa
Keonjhar
Gajapatti
Orissa
Orissa
District
State
31709
52270
53537
31994
22396
21892
23774
33121
25820
44206
42945
39031
23493
25763
32404
51722
35128
35115
Prod./
ha
16104
26663
29593
23614
11355
18451
13689
20981
17454
33938
29109
20706
17132
22437
19838
28057
16212
12640
Prod./
worker
46
94
41
61
31
37
32
25
52
37
44
60
89
67
63
85
54
20
61
12
24
20
26
28
29
31
24
36
32
16
28
56
63
30
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
17.6
15.5
27.3
15.7
13.1
10.7
12.0
15.8
18.4
26.3
20.5
12.6
8.8
14.9
12.6
16.1
17.8
28.6
151
189
154
165
144
148
122
158
134
160
150
176
149
132
173
188
171
179
1.97
1.96
1.81
1.35
1.97
1.19
1.74
1.58
1.48
1.30
1.48
1.88
1.37
1.15
1.63
1.84
2.17
2.78
1521.8
1449.1
1597.1
1449.1
1521.8
1378.2
1648.2
1521.8
1521.8
1449.1
1534.5
1501.3
1378.2
1527
1501.3
1501.3
1295.6
1295.6
152
138
118
133
212
161
394
131
282
134
292
139
362
77
153
98
381
78
67.10
27.00
76.60
47.00
80.60
70.10
52.50
67.90
74.20
27.80
46.10
31.50
70.50
58.70
4.90
37.30
33.60
61.40
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
Jalandhar
Kapurthala
Ludhiana
Mansha
Moga
Mukatsar
N.Shahar
Patiala
Ropar
Punjab
Punjab
Punjab
Punjab
Punjab
Punjab
Punjab
Punjab
Fatehgarh Sahib
Punjab
Punjab
Faridkot
Punjab
Hoshiarpur
Bhatinda
Punjab
Punjab
Amritsar
Punjab
Ferozpur
Sundargarh
Orissa
Gurdaspur
Sonepur
Orissa
Punjab
Sambalpur
Orissa
Punjab
District
State
... 99 ...
44593
60818
56807
60394
62821
58906
69145
61381
53572
45722
45015
58604
63515
58046
57613
48385
22143
33005
27985
Prod./
ha
42256
69065
62579
74386
66742
67457
93238
88006
76468
43880
54078
75742
92099
56567
67080
50357
15565
19473
22197
Prod./
worker
391
399
387
352
414
354
479
375
399
307
276
351
399
501
344
313
24
47
86
96
90
97
100
97
100
99
99
83
74
100
100
99
98
98
18
61
82
97
86
100
99
100
100
98
98
79
83
98
100
98
99
100
NA
NA
2.7
2.5
2.7
1.8
1.8
0.5
2.5
4.4
5.7
5.8
1.2
1.9
1.5
1.0
1.9
1.7
14.6
13.6
180
194
194
198
195
191
198
199
175
179
172
191
187
197
185
179
126
160
1.06
0.88
0.91
0.81
0.94
0.87
0.74
0.70
0.70
1.04
0.83
0.77
0.69
1.03
0.86
0.96
1.42
1.69
890
870
1041
779
779
460
706
708
1041
1315
1486
537
870
460
460
650
1647.6
1443.5
123
303
95
224
200
190
306
136
240
201
294
475
103
126
298
449
309
108
2.40
2.60
1.20
28.30
25.20
16.60
8.90
4.20
0.90
1.70
2.30
17.90
6.20
23.90
23.10
8.70
69.90
51.30
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
108
33 NA 12.9
144
1.26
1527
179 79.50
... 100 ...
Jaisalmer
Rajasthan
Churu
Rajasthan
Jaipur
Chittorgarh
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Bundi
Rajasthan
Hanumangarh
Bikaner
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Bhilwara
Rajasthan
Ganganagar
Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Barmer
Rajasthan
Dungarpur
Baran
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Banswara
Rajasthan
Dausa
Alwar
Rajasthan
Dholpur
Ajmer
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Sangrur
Punjab
Rajasthan
District
State
3317
18463
18127
23091
12708
23796
21843
4770
23232
25055
8075
14604
25350
2909
31054
14383
27727
7364
65002
Prod./
ha
13403
16032
29540
36590
3875
14814
12034
8379
13536
19233
28538
9464
15762
6386
29423
5538
13540
7510
74794
Prod./
worker
71
63
100
59
88
103
107
125
63
88
145
117
84
23
383
12
48
39
71
29
67
73
39
76
11
33
75
85
34
88
16
100
19
41
48
78
21
51
48
29
59
16
27
54
10
62
26
62
16
100
0.0
2.0
0.1
0.7
0.1
1.2
0.5
0.0
0.4
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.7
0.0
0.4
0.1
1.9
1.1
1.0
109
147
142
132
143
136
155
118
146
145
107
134
143
106
143
140
161
115
198
0.25
1.15
0.61
0.63
3.28
1.61
1.82
0.57
1.72
1.30
0.28
1.54
1.61
0.46
1.06
2.60
2.05
0.98
0.87
185.5
563.8
273.5
226.4
728.9
744
561
354.7
841.5
773.4
243
683.2
663.9
265.7
873.8
950.3
657.3
601.8
779
472
666
779
693
124
151
220
1160
420
253
1437
390
394
1574
323
235
506
419
440
3.30
12.50
27.20
22.80
25.20
8.70
19.60
13.60
15.50
3.50
35.40
18.50
16.60
13.30
6.50
50.10
9.90
7.40
6.20
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
Kota
Nagaur
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
... 101 ...
Sikar
Sirohi
Tonk
Udaipur
Coimbatore
Cuddalore
Dharmapuri
Didugul
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
Sawai
Madhopur
Karauli
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jodhpur
Rajasthan
Pali
Jhunjhunu
Rajasthan
Rajsamand
Jhalawar
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jalore
Rajasthan
Rajasthan
District
State
39712
42442
53872
29511
14091
13538
13718
14157
18686
9338
7965
9085
32925
26091
6616
16027
25361
9200
Prod./
ha
16151
6724
17862
16516
4938
17012
11573
12631
15349
4028
11301
14174
39311
14868
12975
12915
17747
10768
Prod./
worker
93
78
204
150
59
49
56
30
116
27
20
21
192
53
17
27
92
33
26
68
49
24
39
37
43
63
14
21
82
56
11
52
58
34
26
62
49
19
32
39
38
50
15
23
58
36
15
36
39
18.9
21.8
11.0
6.9
0.3
0.7
1.3
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.6
0.6
1.1
0.3
1.5
103
111
129
106
129
124
130
142
128
108
108
116
148
156
106
154
154
2.46
6.31
3.02
1.79
2.85
0.80
1.19
1.12
1.22
2.32
0.70
0.64
0.84
1.75
0.51
1.24
1.43
831.6
855.9
1235.8
694.4
645
668.3
591.2
440.3
873.4
567.8
424.4
311.7
732.4
670.7
313.7
405.1
844.3
247
158
214
322
246
461
146
525
280
94
579
1273
270
196
1287
426
315
10.30
40.30
14.00
12.40
20.90
24.80
27.00
10.50
18.50
24.90
27.20
31.80
3.90
6.40
23.90
3.60
18.20
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
24
30
28
0.3
121
0.85
370
659 13.40
... 102 ...
Thoothukudi
Tamil Nadu
Salem
Tamil Nadu
Thiruvarur
Ramanathapuram
Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
Pudukkottai
Tamil Nadu
Thiruvallur
Perambalur
Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
Namakkal
Tamil Nadu
Theni
Nagapattinam
Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
Madurai
Tamil Nadu
The Nilgiris
Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
Karur
Tamil Nadu
Sivagangai
Kanya Kumari
Tamil Nadu
Thanjavur
Kancheepuram
Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
Erode
Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
District
State
34045
18405
48468
56960
98679
42398
21772
43227
11353
35130
32197
54250
19436
34797
38181
23071
67432
39781
46276
Prod./
ha
24266
7019
14065
18716
125222
13023
7683
12272
7134
10831
30463
19794
6992
9321
NA
7389
54104
11683
15956
Prod./
worker
61
214
300
217
NA
289
72
239
61
334
64
47
202
254
NA
73
170
308
155
23
96
89
47
NA
83
67
37
38
63
27
28
81
51
22
41
35
42
23
73
79
50
NA
78
67
37
38
63
29
30
62
53
22
42
41
46
10.1
0.5
8.8
22.1
50.9
3.5
5.0
19.1
0.4
7.4
14.8
17.9
1.2
10.6
23.6
8.3
27.4
4.2
8.1
102
145
139
107
100
129
100
114
100
101
109
127
159
104
110
102
114
127
106
1.40
2.62
3.45
3.04
0.79
3.26
2.83
3.52
1.59
3.24
1.06
2.74
2.78
3.73
NA
3.12
1.25
3.41
2.90
655.7
1129.9
1152.8
833.5
1695.7
1053
876
898
821.2
921.5
949.6
776.5
1341.7
840
1298.1
742.2
1006
1252.1
711.4
170
135
95
110
79
173
117
197
191
147
208
164
138
123
180
94
79
125
271
33.20
11.30
23.40
16.00
7.50
13.10
37.40
36.70
18.60
34.40
18.50
7.00
18.60
10.20
19.80
20.20
16.90
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
... 103 ...
Badaun
Bagpat
Bahraich
Ballia
Balrampur
Banda
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Azamgarh
Agra
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Virudunagar
Tamil Nadu
Ambedkar
Nagar
Auraiya
Villupuram
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
Vellore
Tamil Nadu
Aligarh
Tiruvannmalai
Tamil Nadu
Allahabad
Tirunelveli
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
Tiruchirapalli
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
District
State
15431
31807
24411
26451
78106
33420
27792
30232
38301
25144
37008
37879
19725
40846
40064
29616
47243
42680
Prod./
ha
11398
10912
9567
12173
38160
19342
9539
15126
12309
9048
23252
27361
9715
11079
10989
8708
13924
12320
Prod./
worker
28
96
169
112
324
188
152
135
274
261
189
185
90
216
219
152
263
94
80
82
62
41
59
44
58
67
34
39
77
46
95
92
91
41
35
69
34
100
69
84
NA NA
94
77
99
85
39
57
42
52
65
0.3
1.7
3.6
1.7
1.8
4.3
2.7
2.1
4.8
3.3
4.2
9.7
4.9
5.7
10.3
2.4
12.2
122
144
162
151
159
168
168
162
168
148
167
145
104
120
122
121
116
1.35
2.91
2.55
2.17
2.05
1.73
2.91
2.00
3.11
2.78
1.59
1.38
2.03
3.69
3.65
3.40
3.39
945.5
1149.9
1013.1
1145.5
720.2
821.2
1021.3
752.4
1028.9
975.9
662.8
655.5
829.6
1029.4
917
1046.6
736.9
34.50
19.80
22.10
22.90
34.80
26.20
43.20
23.60
350 52.80
214 18.60
221 51.50
327 43.70
111 28.20
416 28.80
302 29.50
144 28.80
166 50.40
338
302
284
139
304
177
227
150
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
411
50
53 13.4
108
3.46
761.5
160 19.80
District
Barabanki
Bareilly
Basti
Bijnor
Bullandshahr
Chandauli
Chitrakut
Deoria
Etah
Etawah
Faizabad
Farrukhabad
Fatehpur
Firozabad
G.Buddha
Nagar
Ghaziabad
Ghazipur
Gonda
State
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
... 104 ...
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
31215
27208
69057
23613
41525
26024
55906
38005
35477
35419
29589
14959
28771
48865
61005
32321
41946
45443
Prod./
ha
11849
9961
44628
21915
28390
11115
27088
8239
31583
19688
10311
9243
11444
23647
40489
11215
21308
16797
Prod./
worker
149
219
315
142
226
182
360
434
105
171
369
44
259
276
185
367
271
255
86
56
89
82
71
3.2
54
84
1.8
3.7
5.2
0.3
71 13.4
66
93 100
84
5.6
5.1
6.2
2.3
0.4
0.7
5.8
1.7
3.1
2.6
5.7
74 19.9
89
97
78
59
28
87
77 100
94
64
82
92
83
95
84
29
94
89 100
88
62
92
84
154
163
165
113
156
139
144
150
161
161
164
112
177
171
132
146
168
181
2.63
2.73
1.55
1.08
1.46
2.34
2.06
4.61
1.12
1.80
2.87
1.62
2.51
2.07
1.51
2.88
1.97
2.71
1147.6
1051.8
720.2
719.7
655.5
903.6
795.4
1008.9
752.4
694.9
1145.1
940
1056.4
673.5
1108.3
1264
1107.3
1002.7
2.60
298 39.00
254 53.70
148 14.90
118
181 26.50
292 31.10
152 28.50
135 25.00
219 32.30
327 30.80
198 41.90
173 81.50
136 36.00
297 14.90
338 17.90
209 23.20
328 30.20
288 14.20
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
District
Gorakhpur
Hamirpur
Hardoi
Hatharas
J.B.Phule Nagar
Jalaun
Jaunpur
Jhansi
Kannauj
Kanpur City
Kanpur Dehat
Kaushambi
Kheri
Kushi Nagar
Lalitpur
Lucknow
Maharaj Ganj
Mahoba
State
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
... 105 ...
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
15218
39709
53651
19342
41922
46379
24838
27742
42990
48129
20677
27171
26499
58028
50460
31498
16239
26897
Prod./
ha
15736
11146
21434
15418
11342
28301
8131
15372
17680
21245
18088
8488
23379
32562
32473
15360
15556
9039
Prod./
worker
34
247
214
46
222
207
187
159
284
252
70
175
75
317
206
118
38
241
47
83
91
77
72
80
70
74
82
92
64
87
54
85
99
88
36
82
3.2
2.7
3.2
6.0
4.1
7.2
5.8
4.7
2.2
1.0
4.5
2.2
5.4
39
48
5.1
2.4
84 17.9
53
75
76
64
67
64
74 19.9
49
81
45
84
80 12.8
77
32
61
122
181
154
145
154
147
135
143
173
158
131
160
122
153
159
154
117
152
0.97
3.56
2.50
1.25
3.70
1.64
3.05
1.80
2.43
2.27
1.14
3.20
1.13
1.78
1.55
2.05
1.04
2.98
850.7
1364.1
959.2
880.1
1145.1
1068.7
975.9
801.5
801.5
795.4
879.1
997.9
786.6
944.3
662.8
874.8
850.7
1364.1
4.70
241 23.20
202 53.40
138 35.60
272 42.70
224 54.80
486 21.50
132 45.50
221 35.60
153 28.60
143 25.40
344 19.80
277 27.90
349 15.30
171
148 31.50
421 34.20
302 44.10
252 56.50
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
District
Mainpuri
Mathura
Mau
Meerut
Mirzapur
Moradabad
Muzaffarnagar
Pilibhit
Pratapgarh
Raebareli
Rampur
S.Ravi Das
Nagar
Saharanpur
Sant Kabir
Nagar
Shahjahanpur
Shivasti
State
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
... 106 ...
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
22391
39377
33039
63311
20978
46369
27658
25428
44853
77353
48056
20768
81855
28610
32772
35942
Prod./
ha
7112
25709
9809
40605
8961
24899
9340
7480
32211
36456
23394
9149
48990
9854
20097
18535
Prod./
worker
115
315
175
270
269
262
171
191
311
322
305
122
322
216
149
244
81
79
91
42
94
84
91
81
88
87
87
97
99
98
58
31
90
51
90
81
94
85
88
94
98
84
65
95 100
90
98
99
0.9
1.7
4.0
8.3
4.2
2.1
2.8
3.3
0.7
3.0
3.7
2.1
6.5
1.7
2.7
6.3
146
165
173
155
143
188
155
148
172
148
176
146
154
166
149
166
3.15
1.53
3.37
1.56
2.34
1.86
2.96
3.40
1.39
2.12
2.05
2.27
1.67
2.90
1.63
1.94
1147.8
1019.5
1264
949.3
1052.3
944.3
927.6
977.9
1242
758.6
944.3
1134.1
720.2
1021.3
591.4
720.2
6.50
130 56.10
347 37.40
120 58.00
275 14.60
68 30.60
194 31.70
270 54.40
214 65.20
238 27.30
326 30.60
317 17.10
200 28.60
199
126 39.50
271 41.00
177 22.90
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
District
Siddharth
Nagar
Sitapur
Sonbhadra
Sultanpur
Unnao
Varanasi
Almora
Bageshwar
Chamoli
Champawat
Dehradun
Haridwar
Nainital
Pauri Garhwal
Pithoragerh
Rudrapryag
State
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Uttrakhand
Uttrakhand
Uttrakhand
... 107 ...
Uttrakhand
Uttrakhand
Uttrakhand
Uttrakhand
Uttrakhand
Uttrakhand
Uttrakhand
26151
29135
16751
51483
60561
39831
28700
43958
30924
32064
27091
32861
33241
14575
37101
23122
Prod./
ha
6699
8582
7483
17542
40898
19643
9258
14560
7759
11676
9367
14061
12276
6674
18145
8015
Prod./
worker
171
203
75
23
14
516
160
157
74
192
157
14
10
59
89
43
12
19
96
88
82
32
84
64
4.4
6.0
7.4
1.1
3.9
3.0
17
8.7
9 15.8
12 15.5
50 36.3
86 12.1
44 35.9
12 26.3
6 22.5
21 10.3
7 16.7
85
76
83
34
75
44
160
184
154
169
144
156
166
148
180
160
149
155
153
142
149
149
3.90
3.39
2.24
2.93
1.48
2.03
3.10
3.02
3.99
2.75
2.89
2.34
2.71
2.18
2.04
2.88
2207
1528
1182
2315
1233
1297
1056.4
840.8
1000.4
1134.1
974
1264
20
8.70
40 44.30
83 31.80
48 40.50
120 44.40
51 30.30
21 72.10
35 35.70
23 33.70
81 44.10
106 33.10
300 24.10
284 28.50
181 24.80
436 27.60
236 66.30
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
District
Tehri Garhwal
Udhamsigh
Nagar
Uttarakashi
24 Parganas
(North)
24 Parganas
(South)
Bankura
Birbhum
Burdwan
Cooch-Behar
Darjeeling
Dinajpur(South)
Dinajur(North)
Hooghly
Howrah
Jalpaiguri
Malda
State
Uttrakhand
Uttrakhand
Uttrakhand
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
... 108 ...
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
75069
72160
114815
75915
75599
63143
81617
69965
59664
67497
53966
54009
73991
42286
49185
22097
Prod./
ha
25045
49311
45369
23269
31641
29292
83317
27610
25248
31514
19637
21853
68070
11717
33703
7081
Prod./
worker
234
182
749
492
141
199
246
265
269
210
158
NA
118
18
563
3
4.0
20 26.1
96
17 21.9
53 NA 15.7
37 NA 19.3
91 NA 25.4
94 NA 19.4
48 NA 18.0
38 NA 14.7
18 NA 37.9
28 NA 11.8
96 NA 10.4
91 NA 15.0
96 NA 15.1
NA NA 13.5
40 NA 17.1
17
99
14
197
164
217
235
191
162
123
192
184
166
131
140
157
155
171
158
3.00
1.46
2.53
3.26
2.39
2.16
0.98
2.53
2.36
2.14
2.75
2.47
1.09
3.61
1.46
3.12
1594
3454
1501
1438
2083
2083
3088
3244
1314
1344
1466
1765
1766
1256
1706
230 46.00
339 29.00
86 21.60
222 21.10
271 49.00
191 48.90
143 14.70
255 11.20
462 20.30
316 39.20
343 28.50
381 18.50
642 20.60
29 19.50
149 45.70
60 61.20
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
District
Midnapur (
East)
Midnapur
(West)
Murshidabad
Nadia
Purulia
28763
State
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
West Bengal
Average
country
34794
88997
87826
51522
73819
Prod./
ha
15380
38968
38160
NA
NA
Prod./
worker
131
NA
148
147
278
9.3
39 NA 10.0
NA NA
57 NA 10.3
75 NA 11.5
36 NA 18.3
106
260
239
164
173
2.26
2.28
2.30
NA
NA
1361
1386
1366
1650
1650
21.8
21.8
335 31.20
304
404 55.90
559
297
FERT_ NIA GIA FVA

Crop
NSA%
%
% Intensity hectare
mm
sown poor
NPK
%
area:
%
/ha.
000ha
... 109 ...
Annex III
Statewise list of districts in different productivity categories
A. List of districts falling under very low productivity / ha NSA Category:
State
Andhra Pradesh
:
Arunachal Pradesh
:
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
:
:
Gujarat
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
:
:
:
:
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Rajasthan
:
:
:
:
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
:
:
:
Districts
Mahaboobnagar, Anantpur
West Siang, Upper Subansiri, Lower Subansiri,
Tirap, West Kameng, East Kanemg, Upper Siang
Lakhisarai, Araria, Jamui
Bastar, Jashpur, Raipur, Dantewara, Kawardha,
Mahasmund , Rajnandgaon, Surguja, Koriya,
Janjgir-Champa, Korba, Raigarh, Kanker
Panch Mahals, Dangs, Patan, Dahod, Kutch
Doda, Kupwara, Kargil, Leh
Gumla, Simdega
Bijapur , Gadag , Gulbarga , Raichur , Bidar,
Dharwad, Bagalkot, Koppal, Haveri
Anuppur, Barwani, Guna, Jhabua, Panna, Satna,
Shahdol, Ashok Nagar, Katni, Mandla, Rewa,
Sidhi, Umaria, Dindori, Seoni, Damoh, Betul,
Raisen, Khargaon, Balaghat, Chhatarpur, Sagar,
Vidisha, Bhind, Datia
Ahmednagar,Aurangabad, Buldhana, Gadchiroli,
Latur,Washim, Akola, Beed, Jalna, Osmanabad,
Yavatmal, Dhule, Nandurbar, Solapur, Parbhani,
Chandrapur
South Garo Hills
Saiha
Mokokchun, Thensang, Mon, Phek, Wokha
Ajmer, Pali, Tonk, Barmer, Bikaner, Churu,
Dungarpur , Jaisalmer , Rajsamand , Jalore ,
Jodhpur, Nagaur, Sirohi, Udaipur, Sikar, Banswara,
Bhilwara, Jhunjhunu, Hanumangarh
Ramanathapuram
Sonbhadra, Chitrakut, Mahoba, Banda, Hamirpur
Pauri Garhwal
... 110 ...
B. List of districts falling under low productivity / ha NSA category:

State
Districts
Andhra Pradesh
Adilabad,
Medak,
Rangareddy
Arunachal Pradesh
Changlang, East Siang, Tawang
Assam
Darrang, Dibrugarh, Karbi-Anglong, Lakhimpur,

Nalbari , Bongaigaon , Dhemaji , Goalpara ,
Morigon, Dhubri, Kamrup, Kokrajhar, Barpeta,
Sonitpur, Sibsagar, Tinsukia
Bihar
Buxar, Gaya, Jahanabad, Siwan, Champaran(West),

Aurangabad, Gopalganj, Madhubani, Supaul,
Banka, Bhojpur, Champaran(East), Arval, Purnea,
Kishanganj, Sheikhpura, Saran, Nawadha
Chhattisgarh
Dhamtari, Bilaspur, Durg,
Gujarat
Ahmedabad, Mahesana, Surendranagar, Amreli,

Sabarkantha,Vadodara, Banas Kantha
Haryana
Rewari
Jammu & Kashmir
Poonch,
Rajouri
Jharkhand
Palamau, Deogarh, Saraikela, West Singhbhum,

Latehar, Deogarh, Garwha, Pakaur, Jamatra
Karnataka
Belgaum, Chitradurga, Bellary, Chamrajnagar,

Tumkur, Hassan, Devanagree, Chikmagalur
Madhya Pradesh
Bhopal , Chindwara , Dewas , Hoshangabad ,

Morena , Ratlam , Shivpuri , Ujjain , Dhar ,
Gwalior , Narsimpur , Sehore , Shajapur ,
Chhatarpur, Datia, Harda, Jabalpur, Mandsaur,
Rajgarh, Sheopur Kala, Tikamgarh, Neemach
Maharashtra
Nagpur , Sangli , Nanded , Satara , Amravati ,

Bhandara, Wardha
Meghalaya
East Garo Hills, Jainta Hills, West Garo Hills
Mizoram
Aizwal, Chhimtuipui, Lunglei, Kolasib, Mamit
Nagaland
Denapur, Kohima, Zunheboto
Orissa
: Buragarh , Mayurbhanj , Nawapara , Bolangir,

... 111 ...
Baramulla,
Kurnool,
Udhampur,
Nalgonda,
Budgam,
State
Districts
Deogarh , Jharsugda , Koraput , Naworangpur ,
Kalahandi, Sundargarh
Rajasthan
Chittorgarh, Dholpur, Jaipur, Jhalawar, Karauli,

Bharatpur , Bundi , Dausa , Sawai Madhopur ,
Ganganagar , Alwar
Tamil Nadu
Sivagangai, Karur, Nagapattinam, Thiruvarur,

Virudunagar
Uttar Pradesh
Jhansi, Shivasti, Bahraich, Jalaun, Mirzapur,

S.Ravi Das Nagar, Siddharth Nagar, Allahabad,
Ballia, G.Buddha Nagar, Kaushambi, Lalitpur,
Pratapgarh, Gorakhpur, Varanasi, Jaunpur,
Ghazipur, Raebareli, Kanpur Dehat, Azamgarh
Uttarakhand
Rudrapryag, Tehri Garhwal
... 112 ...
C. List of districts falling under average productivity / ha NSA category:

State
Andhra Pradesh
:
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
:
:
Bihar
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
:
:
:
:
Karnataka
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
:
:
:
Meghalaya
Orissa
:
:
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
:
:
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
:
:
Districts
Srikakulam, Warangal, Karimnagar, Prakasam,
Visakhapatnam , Chittoor , Khammam ,
Vizianagarm , Cuddapah
Lohit, Paumpare
Hailakandi , Jorhat , Karimganj , Cachar ,
Golaghat
Patna , Bhagalpur , Darbhanga , Bhabhua ,
Nalanda, Rohtas, Sitamarhi , Samastipur , Katihar
, Monghyr
Valsad , Broach , Gandhinagar , Bhavnagar ,
Jamnagar, Kheda, Porbander
Jhajjer, Bhiwani, Rohtak, Mahendra Garh
Chamba, Hamirpur
Anantnagh, Kathua, Jammu
Sahibganj, Chatra, Dumka, Hazaribagh, Godda,
Lohardaga, Ranchi , East Singhbhum
Uttarakannada, Mysore
Indore
Pune , Raigad , Thane, Kolhapur , Sindhudurg,
Nasik
Ri Bhoi
Gajapatti, Jajpur, Sambalpur, Bhadrak, Ganjam,
Sonepur, Malkangiri, Rayagada, Balasore,
Nayagarh
Baran, Kota
Pudukkottai , Coimbatore , Madurai ,
Tiruvannmalai, Perambalur , Thoothukudi
Balrampur, Badaun, Sant Kabir Ngr, Auraiya,
Basti, Deoria, Mathura, Sultanpur, Chandauli,
Etah, Gonda, Hardoi, Mau, Sitapur, Unnao ,
Etawah , Mainpuri , Aligarh
Almora, Champawat, Bageshwar, Pithoragerh
Purulia
... 113 ...
D. List of districts falling under high productivity / ha NSA category:

State
Districts
Andhra Pradesh
Krishna, Nizamabad, Nellore
Assam
N C Hills
Bihar
Begusarai, Khagaria, Madhupura, Muzafarpur,

Saharsa,Vaishali , Sivhar
Gujarat
Junagarh, Rajkot, Anand , Navsari
Haryana
Gurgaon, Jind, Hissar , Panchkula , Faridabad ,

Kaithal, Sonepat , Ambala , Sirsa
Himachal Pradesh
Kangra, Una , Mandi , Bilaspur
Jammu & Kashmir
Pulwanna
Jharkhand
Dhanbad, Giridih , Bokaro
Karnataka
Mandya, Shimoga, Udupi , Bangalore , Kolar
Kerala
Alappuzha, Kannur, Ernakulam , Kasargod
Madhya Pradesh
Burhanpur
Maharashtra
Ratnagiri , Jalgaon
Meghalaya
East Khasi Hills
Orissa
Angul , Cuttack , Khurda , Kedrapara , Boudh ,

Dhenkanal , Keonjhar , Jagatsingpur , Puri ,
Phulbani (Kandham)
Punjab
Amritsar , Hoshiarpur , Ropar , Gurdaspur ,

Jalandhar , N.Shahar
Tamil Nadu
Dharmapuri , Kancheepuram , Thiruvallur ,

Vellore, Didugul,Thanjavur,Villupuram, Erode,
Tirunelveli , Cuddalore , Namakkal , Theni ,
Krishnagiri , Tiruchirapalli
Uttar Pradesh
Agra,Ambedkar Nagar, Bareilly, Etawah, Kheri,

Mainpuri, Bullandshahr, Faizabad, Kanpur City,
Kushi Nagar, Maharaj Ganj, Pilibhit, Rampur,
Barabanki, Moradabad, Shahjahanpur , Firozabad
, Kannauj , Hatharas , Lucknow , Farrukhabad
Uttarakhand
Nainital, Uttarakashi,
Udhamsigh Nagar
West Bengal
Midnapur (West) , Bankura , 24 Parganas (South)
... 114 ...
Dehradun,
Chamoli,
E. List of districts falling under very high productivity / ha NSA category:

State
Districts
Andhra Pradesh
East Godavari, West Godavari
Gujarat
Surat
Haryana
Fatehbad, Karnal, Kurkshetra, Yamuna Nagar,

Panipat
Himachal Pradesh
Sirmaur, Kinnaur, Solan , Kulu , Simla , Lahaul

& Spiti
Jammu & Kashmir
Srinagar
Jharkhand
Koderma
Karnataka
Dakshinakannada, Kodagu (Coorg)
Kerala
Kottayam , Palakkad , Thrissur , Kozhikode ,

Pathanamthitta , Wynad , Idukki , Kollam ,
Malappuram, Trivandrum
Punjab
Fatehgarh Sahib, Ludhiana, Mukatsar, Bhatinda,

Ferozpur , Mansha , Sangrur , Faridkot ,
Kapurthala, Moga, Patiala
Tamil Nadu
Kanya Kumari, The Nilgiris
Uttar Pradesh
Bagpat , Ghaziabad , Meerut , Muzaffarnagar ,

J.B.Phule Nagar, Bijnor, Saharanpur
Uttarakhand
Haridwar
West Bengal
Cooch-Behar , Hooghly , Malda , 24 Parganas

(North) , Burdwan , Darjeeling , Howrah ,
Murshidabad, Dinajur(North), Dinajpur(South),
Birbhum, Midnapur (East), Jalpaiguri , Nadia
... 115 ...

Regional Variation in Agricultural Productivity, ICAR, 2009 PDF

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Deskripsi Asli:

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Regional Variation in Agricultural Productivity, ICAR, 2009 PDF

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Discussion Paper NPP 01/2009

Regional Variations in Agricultural

Ramesh Chand, Sanjeev Garg

National Professor Project

Data and Methodology

Data Limitations and Proxies

Variations in Agricultural Productivity

Distribution in Broad Categories

Factors Affecting Productivity

Effect of Various Factors on Productivity

State Level Analysis of District Wise Productivity

Jammu & Kashmir

Table 2: Distribution of districts in broad productivity

Table 3: Productivity levels and characteristics for

Table 4: Estimates of simultaneous equation model on

Table 5: Estimate of elasticity of per hectare productivity

Table 6: Distribution of districts in different States according

Frequency distribution of districts according to

Distribution of districts in different productivity

Fig. 3: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Jammu

Fig. 4: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 5: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Punjab :

Fig. 6: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Haryana :

Fig. 7: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Uttarakhand :

Fig. 8: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 9: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Bihar :

Fig. 10: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Jharkhand :

Fig. 11: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Orissa :

Fig. 12: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 13: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Assam :

Fig. 14: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Rajasthan :

Fig. 15: Districtwise agricultural productivity in Gujarat :

Fig. 16: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 17: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 18: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 19: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 20: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 21: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 22: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 23: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 24: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 25: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

Fig. 26: Districtwise agricultural productivity in

... vii ...

Per hectare productivity in various districts

Per hectare productivity in various districts

Annexure III: Statewise list of districts in different

(A) List of districts falling under very

(B) List of districts falling under low

(C) List of districts falling under average

(D) List of districts falling under high

(E) List of districts falling under very high

... viii ...

Regional Variations in Agricultural Productivity A District Level Study

The first district wise analysis of performance of agriculture covering

Ramesh Chand, Sanjeev Garg and Lalmani Pandey

Ramesh Chand, Sanjeev Garg and Lalmani Pandey

Regional Variations in Agricultural Productivity A District Level Study

2.1 The Model :

Ramesh Chand, Sanjeev Garg and Lalmani Pandey

due to non-availability of proper data due to the various reasons are:

17. Rape seed & Mustard

Equation: RUPOORPER = C(1) +C(2)VCOPH +C(3)WRKRPERHA

Equation:VCOPH = C(11) +C(12)FERTPH+C(13)FRUITVEGPER+C(14)