Received 24 February 1998; received in revised form 25 June 1998; accepted 8 July 1998
Abstract
New, simple and convenient potentiometric, spectrouorimetric and spectrophotometric methods are described for the
determination of metformin in pharmaceutical preparations. The potentiometric technique is based on preparation of PVC
membrane sensors incorporating metforminreineckate, and metformintungstosilicate ion-pairs as electroactive species with
dioctylphthalate and o-nitrophenyloctylether as plasticizers, respectively. A membrane consisting of carboxylated PVC
plasticized with dibutylsebacate is also prepared and tested. These sensors give rapid Nernstian response for 101105 M
metformin at pH range 511. The metformintungstosilicate based sensor is used in a ow-through sandwich cell for ow
injection potentiometric determination of metformin. Graphite sensors coated or doped with metformintungstosilicate-PVC,
Cu-diethyldithiocarbamate and Ni-diethyldithiocarbamate are also prepared and used for monitoring the titration of the drug
with tetraphenyl borate (TPB), Cu2 and Ni2 ions, respectively. The spectrouorimetric method depends on the reaction of
metformin with chrysenequinone in alkaline medium to give a Schiff's base, which upon hydrolysis gives the free base. The
latter in the presence of 1-naphthol gives a uorescent product with excitation and emission maxima at 450 and 520 nm,
respectively. The uorescenceconcentration relationship is linear over the range 20200 mg ml1 metformin. The proposed
spectrophotometric technique involves reaction of metformin with Cu2 in basic medium to form a Cumetformin complex.
The complex is dissolved in cyclohexylamine and its maximum absorption at 540 nm is measured. Beer's law is obeyed over
the range 0.52 mg ml1 metformin. Various cations, some nitrogenous compounds or drug excipients cause no interferences.
Results obtained by these techniques are comparable and compare favorably with data obtained using the British
Pharmacopoeia method. # 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Metformin; Potentiometry; Spectrouorimetry; Spectrophotometry; PVC membranes; Pharmaceutical analysis; Flow injection
analysis; Graphite sensors
1. Introduction
0003-2670/99/$ see front matter # 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S0003-2670(98)00500-5
300
Metformin has been determined by titration in nonaqueous medium with perchloric acid using different
indicators [3]. Potentiometric titration of the drug with
perchloric acid in glacial acetic acid and mercury(II)
acetate has been developed [1]. Conductometric titration of metformin with copper sulfate has been
described [4]. Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) matrix
membrane sensors based on the use of ion association
complexes of metformin with tetraphenylborate [5],
tungstophosphate [6] and molybdophosphate [7] have
been used for direct potentiometric determination of
metformin in pharmaceutical preparations.
Spectrophotometric determination of metformin is
based on reaction with NaOCl followed by NaOH and
ZnSO4 to give a yellow color [8]. Spectrophotometric
determination of metformin in biological uids has
been also suggested by reactions of metformin with
biacetyl and 1-naphthol in 50% alkaline ethandiol [9],
and bromothymol blue in phosphate buffer [10].
Nuclear magnetic resonance (n.m.r.) spectrometry
[11], gas chromatography [12,13], and liquid chromatography [1417] have also been described for determination of metformin in pharmaceutical preparations
and biological uids.
In the present work, novel metformin sensors are
described based on the use of the ion association
complexes of metformin with reineckate and tungstosilicate as ion exchangers in a plasticized PVC matrix.
Carboxylated PVC as a native ionic polymer without
drug ion-pairs is also prepared and tested. These
sensors display stable, fast and linear response over
a wide range of concentrations and pH values, and are
used in a ow-through cell for continuous measurements. Graphite rods doped or coated with copperdiethyldithiocarbamate (Cu-DDC), nickel-diethyldithiocarbamate (Ni-DDC) and metformintungstosilicate-PVC are used for monitoring the potentiometric
titration of metformin in pharmaceutical preparations
with Cu2, Ni2 or tetraphenylborate. A spectrouorimetric method based on the reaction of metformin
with chrysenequinone and 1-naphthol in alkaline med-
301
302
Ten tablets of the drug were weighed and pulverized. A portion equivalent to one tablet (500850 mg)
was accurately transferred to a 50 ml beaker, dissolved
in the least amount of puried water and ltered to
remove insoluble components. The ltrate was transferred to a 500 ml volumetric ask, completed to the
mark with water and the content determined by the
proposed potentiometric, spectrouorimetric or spectrophotometric methods.
303
Table 1
Performance characteristics of metformin-PVC membrane sensors
Parameter
MFRE
MFTSA
Carboxylated PVC
Slope (mV/decade)
Intercept (mV)
Correlation coefficient (r) (n6)
Lower limit of linear range (M)
Lower limit of detection (M)
Response time for 1102 M (s)
Working range of pH
59.90.5
325.20.2
0.996
9.5105
5.2105
10
511
60.00.3
125.30.4
0.997
5.1105
5.5106
30
511
55.00.6
320.10.2
0.996
8.5105
6.9106
20
511
Fig. 1. Potentiometric response of: (A) metformintungstosilicate (MFTSA); (B) carboxylated-PVC; and (C) metforminreineckate (MF
RE) polymeric membrane sensors.
304
Na
NH
4
Ca2
2
Ba
Co2
Cu2
Urea
Aniline
Guanidine
Glutamic acid
n-Butylamine
t-Butylamine
Dicyandiamide
2-Diethylaminoethanol
pot:
KMF;B
MFRE
MFTSA
Carboxylated
PVC
6.2103
7.1103
9.2103
5.3103
4.2103
2.3102
4.1103
3.5102
5.2102
9.2103
8.3102
7.5102
8.1103
6.2102
4.9103
4.8103
8.2103
1.1103
6.5103
1.3102
3.2103
2.7102
3.2102
1.6103
5.9102
9.0102
1.8102
8.2102
4.2103
4.3103
7.5103
5.2103
2.6102
3.0102
1.2103
2.6102
4.1102
2.6103
4.1101
5.9102
3.1102
7.2102
305
Fig. 2. Typical potentiometric titration curves of: (A) 4.0; (B) 6.0; and (C) 8.0 ml of 0.1 M metformin with standard solution of 1102 M
NaTPB using an MFTSA PVC graphite sensor.
306
Fig. 3. Typical potentiometric titration curves of: (A) 2.0; (B) 4.0; (C) 6.0; and (D) 8.0 ml of 0.1 M metformin with standard 0.1 M CuSO4
using a Cu-DDC graphite sensor.
307
Fig. 4. Typical potentiometric titration curves of: (A) 2.0; (B) 4.0;
(C) 6.0; and (D) 8.0 ml of 0.1 M metformin with standard 0.1 M
NiSO4 using an Ni-DDC graphite sensor.
NCO or N
3 [25]. In the present work, metformin
was allowed to react with Cu2 in a strongly alkaline
medium to form a water-insoluble pink complex. The
complex is precipitated along with copper hydroxide.
Trials were made for quantication of metformin by
extraction of its copper complex with some waterimmiscible organic solvents such as benzene, nitrobenzene, carbon tetrachloride, methyl isobutylketone,
butanone, isobutyl alcohol, cyclohexane, and chloroform. None of these solvents was suitable for quantitative extraction of the Cumetformin complex.
Attempts were next made to use water-miscible
organic solvents to effect dissolution of coppermetformin complex. It was found that some aliphatic
amines such as diethylamine, n-butylamine and cyclohexylamine could dissolve the Cumetformin complex completely to give a violet colored solution.
Cyclohexylamine gave the maximum absorbance
compared to the other amines. The basicity of cyclohexylamine is sufcient for complex formation without a need for addition of alkali. Aqueous ammonia
was not suitable to dissolve the complex because it
Five measurements.
Drug
98.90.4
98.70.5
98.90.3
99.40.2
98.80.6
99.10.4
98.60.5
98.50.7
98.50.6
98.90.3
98.70.2
98.30.3
98.10.7
98.40.6
98.20.6
Ni-DDC
Cu-DDC
MFTSA
PVC-COOH
Graphite sensors
PVC-membrane sensors
MFRE
Potentiometric titration
Direct potentiometry
99.10.2
98.10.6
97.90.7
MFTSA
99.70.5
99.30.2
99.80.3
FIA
99.10.6
98.80.2
99.30.3
98.60.3
98.80.4
98.50.6
98.40.5
98.50.7
96.90.8
SpectroSpectroNon-aqueous
fluorimetry photometry titrimetry (BP)
Table 3
Determination of metformin in some pharmaceutical preparations using manual and flow injection potentiometry, spectrofluorimetry, spectrophotometry and non-aqueous titrimetry
308
S.S.M. Hassan et al. / Analytica Chimica Acta 378 (1999) 299311
309
Fig. 5. Reaction scheme of metformin with chrysenequinone in the presence of 1-naphthol in an alkaline medium.
310
Fig. 6. Fluorescence spectra of 1.2103 M metformin: (A) excitation; and (B) emission spectra.
Fig. 7. Absorption spectra of the reaction product of 1102 M metformin with 0.2 M copper(II) sulfate and 40% (v/v) cyclohexylamine (A),
and 0.2 M copper(II) sulfate with 40% cyclohexylamine (blank) (B).
4. Conclusions
A statistical comparison of the results obtained by
the proposed methods and those obtained by the
British Pharmacopoeia method shows good correlation. The proposed potentiometric, spectrouorimetric
and spectrophotometric methods give comparable
results and did not suffer from any interferences by
many pharmaceutical additives, diluents and active
ingredients commonly used in drug formulations. The
spectrouorimetric method has the advantages of high
accuracy and direct determination of metformin in
dosage forms at room temperature without prior
separation. The potentiometric methods described in
this work offer many advantages over the other proposed spectrouorimetric and spectrophotometric
techniques in terms of low limit of detection
(8.6 mg ml1), wide range of concentration assay
(8.6 mg ml1165 mg ml1), and wide pH working
range (511). The use of ow injection potentiometry
enables a large sample throughput rate (ca. 80
samples h1) and application to small sample volumes
(ca. 20 ml). Previously reported spectrophotometric
methods involved time-consuming extraction steps
[9,27]. The n.m.r. [11] and conductometric [4] procedures were used for determining milligram quantities
of metformin. The advantages offered by the present
methods suggest their use for the routine analysis of
metformin in pharmaceutical preparations.
References
[1] British Pharmacopoeia, vol. II, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1988.
[2] H.D. Breidhal, G.C. Ennis, F.I.R. Martin, J.R. Stawell, P. Taft,
Drugs 3 (1972) 204.
311
[3] J.M. Calatayud, M.C.P. Marti, P.C. Falco, Analyst 110 (1985)
981.
[4] J.M. Calatayud, P.C. Falco, M.C.P. Marti, Anal. Lett. 18
(1985) 1381.
[5] M.S. Rizk, H.M. Abel-Fattah, Y.M. Issa, E.M. Atia, Anal.
Lett. 26 (1993) 415.
[6] A.F. Shoukry, M.S. Rizk, H.M. Abdel-Fattah, Y.M. Issa, E.M.
Atia, J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 60 (1994) 217.
[7] M.S. Rizk, J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 61 (1994) 67.
[8] P. Pignard, Ann. Biol. Clin. 20 (1962) 325.
[9] G. Siest, F. Ross, J.J. Gabou, Bull. Soc. Pharm. 58 (1963) 29.
[10] E.R. Garrett, J. Tsau, J. Pharm. Sci. 16 (1972) 1404.
[11] S.Z. El-Khateeb, H.N. Assaad, M.G. El-Bardicy, A.S. Ahmed,
Anal. Chim. Acta 208 (1988) 321.
[12] D. Alkalay, J. Volk, M.F. Bartlett, J. Pharm. Sci. 56 (1976)
525.
[13] R.T. Sane, V.J. Banavaliker, V.R. Bhate, V.G. Nayak, Indian
Drugs 26 (1989) 647.
[14] L. Benzi, P. Marchetti, P. Cecchetti, R. Navalesi, Biomed.
Appl. 48 (1986) 184.
[15] J. Keal, A. Somogyi, J. Chromatogr., Biomed. Appl. 51
(1986) 503.
[16] M.S.F. Ross, J. Chromatogr. 133 (1977) 408.
[17] B.G. Charles, N.W. Jacobsen, P.J. Ravenscroft, Chin. Chem.
27 (1981) 434.
[18] S.S.M. Hassan, M.A. Ahmed, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 74
(1991) 900.
[19] S.S.M. Hassan, F.M. EL Zawawy, S.A.M. Marzouk, E.M.
Elnemma, Analyst 117 (1992) 1683.
[20] A. Craggs, G.I. Moody, J.D.R. Thomas, J. Chem. Educ. 51
(1974) 451.
[21] T.S. Ma, S.S.M. Hassan, Organic Analysis Using Ion
Selective Electrodes, Academic Press, London, 1982.
[22] IUPAC Analytical Chemistry Division, Commission on
Analytical Nomenclature, Pure Appl. Chem. 67 (1995).
[23] S. Tanabe, T. Sakaguchi, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 26 (1978) 337.
[24] M.M. Bedair, S.M. Galal, A.A. Gazy, A.M. Wahib, Microchem. J. 50 (1997) 94.
[25] I.S. Petru, G. Constanta, C. Olimpiu, Z. Phys. Chem. 65
(1969) 248.
[26] A.E. Harvey, D.L. Manning, J. Chem. Soc. 72 (1950) 4488.
[27] M.G. El-Bardicy, S.Z. El-Khateeb, A.K.S. Ahmed, H.N.
Assaad, Spectrosci. Lett. 22 (1989) 1173.