primarily because, without strong concept networks in place, our brain lacked the mass, the
attachments, and neural energy to effectively encode them.
An Example
To get a feeling of how having an understanding of big-picture concepts helps us encode
details, quickly read the following passage.
With hocked gems financing him, our hero bravely defied all scornful laughter that tried to
prevent his scheme. "Your eyes deceive," he had said. "An egg not a table, correctly typifies
this unexplored planet." Now three sturdy sisters sought proof. Forging along, sometimes
through calm vastness, yet more often very turbulent peaks and valleys, days became weeks
as many doubters spread fearful rumors about the edge. At last from nowhere welcome
winged creatures appeared, signifying momentous success.
Now, if three hours after reading this passage, we asked you what details you remember,
you would probably recall very few. Why? Because you were never given the overall
concept of this passage. Researchers have found that people who were informed that this
passage was about Christopher Columbus' voyage to the new world remembered so much
more than those who were not told.
Another Example
I think you will be amazed that you can read and understand the following passage that a
friend sent to me:
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal
pweor of the hmuan mind it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny
iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl
mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. This is because you brain is always trying
to understand concepts before it focuse on details. And you awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
ipmorantt!
Why does our brain naturally prefer to think in big-picture
concepts rather than minute details? Because our ancestors
who thought and focused on the "big-picture" had a better
chance of surviving and passing their genes down to us than
our ancestors who were overly focused on details. Thinking
in concepts allows the brain to take quick survival action in
situations that lack a high degree of
effectively learn the details of a subject before they understand the concepts is like trying to
get someone to quickly put together a 5,000-piece jigsaw puzzle without ever seeing the
image on the box. It is very difficult, if not impossible. Researcher R. C. Andersson found
that connecting new information to previously learned concepts "is a better predictor of
comprehension than is ... an intelligent test score!"
In the book Cracking the Learning Code and in future newsletters you will discover:
Why the majority of doctoral candidates never gain their advanced degrees.
Why "good" students are often unable to apply their knowledge of "facts" in the real world.
Why students that spend more time on concepts in the classroom during the day need to
spend less time on homework at night.
How in New Zealand the "concept first" technique increased scores on national
standardized tests by an amazing 40 percent.
Why, because Japanese students focus on concepts over details, they continually outscore
their American counterparts on math achievement tests.
Why studies in reading confirm that the more students focus on the details in a passage, the
less understanding they have of the passage.
Why one study showed the more education, the less ability a person had to grasp the
concepts needed to program a VCR.
Why reports show that between 75 and 85 percent of secondary students dislike math.
Why it will take you only 10 seconds to memorize the following letters and their
corresponding geometric shapes when you are given the right conceptual framework.
Why you need to stimulate only 5 percent of the neurons in one of your concept network in
order to stimulate the whole network.
Why the ability to conceptualize is one of the "crowning achievements" of the human
intellect.
How one neuron in a concept network has the capacity to be part of hundreds, if not
thousands, of other memory networks.
How people with neurological disorders, such as savants (who have one dramatically
overactive concept network), agnosias (who lose specific concept networks), and
synaesthetes (who have interconnected concept networks allowing them to taste colors and
see sounds), have helped science understand that the brain prefers to process concepts
before details.
How even small amounts of new information can cause one of your concept networks to
subdivide into a new concept network.
Why the more neural connections you have in your brain about a concept, the more neural
material you have in place to snag new details about that concept.
Why one evaluator of textbooks says that their emphasis on details makes them "a
collection of missed opportunities."
Why your physical memory is less like a container that fills up with miscellaneous details
and more like a lattice of hooks.
Why, because there are so many more details in our modern world, your brain is 20 percent
heavier than your grandparents'.
Why multitasking diffuses your neural energy, making you less efficient.
Why, in order to build highly efficient learning systems, designers must emphasize meaning
first, concepts second, and details last.