This
assignment
page
includes
introductory
information,
a
list
of
readings
(if
any)
required
to
do
this
assignment,
instructions
for
doing
the
assignment,
and
grading
criteria.
References
to
ABO
are
to
Alred,
Brusaw,
and
Oliu
(2015).
Introduction
Your
boss
at
Larson
Communications
(LC)
has
a
new
project
for
you
and
a
team
of
your
colleagues.
LC
has
a
new
clientMinneapolis-based
Furnisimple,
Inc.that
manufactures
low-cost
furniture
similar
to
that
sold
by
IKEA,
the
Swedish
retailer.
Furnisimples
product
manager,
Candace
Nielsen,
likes
the
idea
of
providing
assembly
instructions
similar
to
those
that
come
with
IKEA
furniture.
(They
would
not
copy
IKEAs
instructions,
of
course,
but
would
use
the
same
approach.)
Furnisimples
operations
director,
Erik
Hanson,
on
the
other
hand,
thinks
the
IKEA
instructions
are
frustrating
and
not
very
useful.
The
companys
president,
Carla
Magnusson,
wants
to
know
whether
customers
would
find
IKEA-style
instructions
useful,
and
she
has
hired
LC
to
figure
it
out.
A
couple
of
key
facts:
Ms.
Magnusson
is
quite
cost-conscious,
so
this
project
has
a
limited
budget.
She
nevertheless
decided
to
hire
LC,
because
she
figured
internal
testing
would
be
difficult
with
Mr.
Hanson
and
Ms.
Nielsen
already
having
formed
opinions.
Furnisimple
has
retained
LC
to
perform
usability
testing
on
the
IKEA
assembly
instructions
for
one
producta
bookshelf.
Larson
sold
them
on
the
fact
that
LCs
technical
communication
teams
are
made
up
of
younger
folks,
a
significant
demographic
for
Furnisimples
products;
thus
the
decision
to
assign
this
project
to
your
team.
Ideally,
Magnusson
would
like
usability
testing
by
customers
from
other
cultures,
as
Furnisimple
is
hoping
to
compete
with
IKEA
in
other
countries.
Furnisimple
wont
pay
for
that,
however,
so
Larson
has
said
that
the
report
should
have
a
section
that
addresses
ways
that
Furnisimple
might,
in
the
future,
conduct
usability
testing
addressing
the
needs
of
people
living
in
other
cultures.
Finally,
Furnisimple
expects
the
results
in
the
form
of
a
formal
report.
Page 1
Assignment
description
Larson
has
directed
your
team
to
conduct
the
testing
and
write
the
formal
report.
He
wants
you
to
use
three
different
methods
for
collecting
the
usability
data.
Analysis
of
your
audience:
Do
your
best
to
analyze
Furnisimple
and
its
executives
as
your
audience
and
the
rhetorical
situation
in
which
they
have
placed
you.
This
should
guide
your
performance
of
the
assignment,
but
you
will
not
describe
this
analysis
in
your
report.
Given
this
made-up
scenario,
you
may
have
to
guess
some
about
this,
but
we
will
also
discuss
in
class.
As
far
as
you
know,
LC
has
never
prepared
a
report
of
this
kind.
Report
format:
Based
on
the
readings
in
ABO,
prepare
a
Microsoft
Word
(or
PDF)
document
for
your
instructor
that
conforms
to
the
conventions
of
a
formal
report.
Larson
wants
a
report
format
very
much
like
ABO
figure
F-5.
Report
contents
and
method
of
development:
You
get
the
sense
that
Larson
has
not
really
done
this
kind
of
work
before.
He
wants
you
to
identify
the
best
approach
for
preparing
this
report
by
the
clients
deadline.
Larson
has
ideas
about
how
you
can
gather
the
necessary
usability
data,
but
he
says
hell
talk
with
you
about
that
in
the
next
few
days.
Submission
instructions
You
will
work
on
this
assignment
inside
and
outside
the
classroom
for
the
next
few
weeks
with
your
group.
Your
group
may
(optionally)
turn
in
a
draft
or
detailed
outline
of
the
report
by
the
date
specified
on
the
course
schedule
to
receive
feedback
from
Larson
on
it.
The
final
report
is
due
on
the
date
set
out
in
the
course
schedule.
You
will
submit
it
as
an
MS
Word
document
or
a
PDF
file.
Grading criteria
Report
uses
proper
format
as
laid
out
in
ABO
(adapted
based
on
your
discussions
for
this
purpose).
Report
has
strong
organization,
with
clearly
articulated
subject
and
purpose
and
clear
address
of
audience
(in
this
case,
Furnisimple
executives).
Report
fully
covers
the
items
described
above.
Report
is
free
from
grammatical
and
mechanical
errors.
See
the
syllabus
for
general
grading
principles.
Works
cited
Alred,
G.
J.,
Brusaw,
C.
T.,
&
Oliu,
W.
E.
(2015).
Handbook
of
Technical
Writing
(11th
edition).
Boston:
Bedford/St.
Martins.
Page 2