Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
177 / Thursday, September 13, 2007 / Notices
VRS and IP Relay providers to obtain
and keep a record of affirmative
acknowledgement by every subscriber of
having received and understood the
advisory that E911 service may not be
available through VRS and IP Relay or
may be in some way limited by
comparison to traditional E911 service;
and (8) how the Commission may
ensure that providers have updated
location information, and the respective
obligations of the providers and the
consumers in this regard.
On May 8, 2006, the Commission
released the Misuse of IP Relay Service
and VRS Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, (IP Relay Fraud FNPRM),
CG Docket No. 03–123, FCC 06–58
which contained the following
information collection requirements
involving user registration, e.g., callers
register to use VRS and IP Relay and
provide their requisite information as
necessary: The IP Relay Fraud FNPRM
sought comment on: (1) Whether IP
Relay and VRS providers should be
required to implement user registration
system in which users provide certain
information to their providers, in
advance, as a means of curbing
illegitimate IP Relay and VRS calls; (2)
what information should be required of
the user; (3) whether there are steps that
could be taken, or technology
implemented, to prevent the wrongful
use of registration information; and (4)
whether the Commission should require
VRS and IP Relay providers to maintain
records of apparently illegitimate calls
that were terminated by the providers.
On May 9, 2006, the Commission
released the VRS Interoperability
Declaratory Ruling and Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking
(Interoperability FNPRM), In the Matter
of Telecommunications Relay Services
and Speech-to-Speech Services for
individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities, CG Docket No. 03–123, FCC
06–57. In the Interoperability FNPRM,
the Commission sought comment on the
feasibility of establishing a single, open,
and global database of proxy numbers
for VRS users that would be available to
all service providers, so that a hearing
person can call a VRS user through any
VRS provider, and without having first
to ascertain the VRS user’s current IP
address. The Commission also sought
comment on nature of the proxy
numbers that might be used and how
they might be administered. The
Commission sought comment on the
role of the Commission in creating and
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
maintaining the database. In the
Interoperability FNPRM, the
Commission recognized: (a) That when
a hearing person contact a VRS user by
calling a VRS provider, the calling party
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:29 Sep 12, 2007 Jkt 211001
52375
has to know in advance the IP address
of the VRS user so that the calling party
can give that address to the VRS CA (b)
that because most consumers’ IP
addresses are dynamic, the VRS
consumer may not know the IP address
of his or her VRS equipment at a
particular time; (c) that some VRS
providers have created their own
database of ‘‘proxy’’ or ‘‘alias’’ numbers
that associate with the IP address of
their customers, even if a particular
person’s IP address is dynamic and
changes; (d) that databases are
maintained by the service provider and,
generally, are not shared with other
service providers; and (e) that a person
desiring to call a VRS consumer via the
consumer’s proxy number can only use
the services of the VRS provider that
generates the number.
The Interoperability FNPRM
contained the following information
collection requirements involving an
open, global database of VRS proxy
numbers. The Interoperability FNPRM
sought comment on: (1) Whether VRS
providers should be required to provide
information to populate an open, global
database of VRS proxy numbers and to
keep the information current; (2)
whether the Interstate TRS Fund
administrator, a separate entity, or a
consortium of service providers should
be responsible for the maintenance and
operation of an open, global database of
VRS proxy numbers; (3) whether Deaf
and hard of hearing individuals using
video broadband communication need
uniform and static end-point numbers
should be linked to the North American
Numbering Plan (NANP) that would
remain consistent across all VRS
providers so that they can contact one
another and be contacted to the same
extent that Public Switched Telephone
Network (PSTN) and VoIP users are able
to identify and call one another; (4)
whether participation by service
providers should be mandatory so that
all VRS users can receive incoming
calls.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–18058 Filed 9–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Submitted for
Review to the Office of Management
and Budget
September 7, 2007.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before October 15,
2007. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the FCC contact listed below as
soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, (202) 395–
5887, or via fax at 202–395–5167 or via
Internet at Nicholas A.
Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to Judith-B.
Herman@fcc.gov, Federal
Communications Commission, Room 1–
B441, 445 12th Street, SW., DC 20554 or
an e-mail to PRA@fcc.gov. If you would
like to obtain or view a copy of this
information collection, you may do so
by visiting the FCC PRA Web page at:
http://www.fcc.gov/omd/pra.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or copies of the
information collection(s), contact Judith
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1
 52376 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 177 / Thursday, September 13, 2007 / Notices
B. Herman at 202–418–0214 or via the
Internet at Judith- B.Herman@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–1039.
Title: Nationwide Programmatic
Agreement Regarding the Section 106
National Historic Preservation Act—
Review Process, WT Docket No. 03–128.
Form Nos.: FCC Forms 620 and 621.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-
profit, not-for-profit institutions, and
state, local or tribal government.
Number of Respondents: 12,000
respondents; 12,000 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 1–10
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement, recordkeeping
requirement and third party disclosure
requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Total Annual Burden: 123,888 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $9,225,000.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
In general, there is no need for
confidentiality for respondents. On a
case by case basis, the Commission may
be required to withhold from disclosure
certain information about the location,
character, or ownership of historic
property, including traditional religious
sites.
Needs and Uses: The Commission
will submit this information collection
to the OMB as an extension (no change
in reporting, recordkeeping or third
party disclosure requirements) during
this comment period to obtain the full
three-year clearance from them. There is
no change in the estimated number of
respondents/responses, burden hours or
annual costs.
This data is used by FCC staff, State
Historic Preservation Officers (SHPO),
Tribal Historic Preservation Officers
(THPO), and the Advisory Council of
Historic Preservation (ACHP) to take
such action as may be necessary as to
ascertain whether a proposed action
may affect historic properties that are
listed or eligible for listing in the
National Register as directed by Section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA), and the
Commission’s rules. FCC Form 620,
New Tower (NT) Submission Packet is
to be completed by or on behalf of
applicants to construct new antenna
support structures by or for the use of
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
licensees of the FCC. The Packet is to be
submitted to the State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO), or to the
Tribal Historic Preservation Office
(THPO), as appropriate, before any
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:29 Sep 12, 2007 Jkt 211001
construction or other installation
activities on the site begin. Failure to
provide the Submission Packet and
complete the review process under
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) prior to
beginning construction may violate the
NHPA and the Commission’s rules.
FCC Form 621, Collocation (CO)
Submission Packet is to be completed
by or on behalf of applicants who wish
to collocate an antenna or antennas on
an existing communications tower or
non-tower structure by or for the use of
licensees of the FCC. The Packet
(including Form CO and attachments) is
to be submitted to the SHPO or to the
THPO, as appropriate, before any
construction or other installation
activities on the site begin. Failure to
provide the Submission Packet and
complete the review process under
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act prior to the beginning
construction or other installation
activities may violate the NHPA and the
Commission’s rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–18060 Filed 9–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission
for Extension Under Delegated
Authority, Comments Requested
September 7, 2007.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Persons wishing to comment on
this information collection should
submit comments November 13, 2007. If
you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), (202)
395–5887, or via fax at 202–395–5167,
or via the Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and
to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov, Federal
Communications Commission (FCC),
Room 1-B441, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. To submit your
comments by e-mail send them to:
PRA@fcc.gov. If you would like to
obtain or view a copy of this
information collection after the 60 day
comment period, you may do so by
visiting the FCC PRA Web page at:
http://www.fcc.gov/omd/pra.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
information collection(s) send an e-mail
to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Judith B.
Herman at 202–418–0214.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control No.: 3060–1000.
Title: Section 87.147, Authorization of
Equipment.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-
profit.
Number of Respondents: 25
respondents; 25 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
and one-time reporting requirements,
and third party disclosure requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Total Annual Burden: 25 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
There is no need for confidentiality.
Needs and Uses: This collection will
be submitted as an extension (no change
in recordkeeping requirements) after
this 60 day comment period to Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in order
to obtain the full three year clearance
from them. There is no change in the
number of respondents/responses and
the estimated burden hours.
13SEN1