DOI: 10.1002/adem.201400505
Five R-trialkoxysilanes, with R: CH3, C6H5, NH2(CH2)3, Cl(CH2)3, or NC(CH2)3 are used as
crosslinkers for two polydimethylsiloxane-a,v-diols with different molecular masses (35,000 and
125,000 g mol 1) The crosslinking occurs by condensation at room temperature under the influence of
the environmental moisture and in presence of dibutyltindilaurate as a catalyst. After aging, the films
are characterized by mechanical testing, dielectric spectroscopy, and thermal analysis. Moisture
sorption capacity is evaluated by dynamic vapour sorption analysis, while the morphology of the
crosslinked films is observed by scanning electron microscopy in cryo-fracture. The mechanical
response to an applied electric field is measured. The results are discussed in correlation with polymeric
chain length and the nature of R from crosslinking agent emphasizing in principle an increasing of the
dielectric permittivity and actuation with the polarity of the organic group but a worsening of these
with increasing length of the polymer chain matrix.
1. Introduction
To date, silicone rubbers constitute, besides acrylics and
polyurethanes, the basis of most successful dielectric elastomer devices.[1] Their use in actuators is due to their good
performances and stable properties over a wide range of
temperatures.[2] Due to the high flexibility of the SiO bonds,
silicones possess good elastomer behavior,[1,3] which is useful
wileyonlinelibrary.com
FULL PAPER
http://www.aem-journal.com
Sample
R8M
R8Ph
R8C
R8A
R8Cy
R9M
R9Ph
R9C
R9A
R9Cy
[a]
Polymer code/Mn
[g/mol]
Crosslinking
agent
R8/34500
MTES
PhTES
CPTMS
APTES
CyPTES
MTES
PhTES
CPTMS
APTES
CyPTES
R9/125000
SSQ, wt.%
[mmol/100 g][a]
5.2
7.2
8.7
6.8
7.0
5.3
7.4
8.9
6.9
7.2
(78)
(56)
(67)
(61)
(59)
(79)
(57)
(69)
(63)
(60)
Theoretical estimation of the silsesquioxane (SSQ) quantity that could form by full hydrolysis and condensation of the excess crosslinker.
http://www.aem-journal.com
FULL PAPER
Table 1. The cured polydimethylsiloxane films prepared by using different crosslinking agents at room temperature: the same amounts of PDMS (10 g), crosslinker (1.5 ml)
and DBTDL catalyst (0.1 ml) were used.
FULL PAPER
http://www.aem-journal.com
Sample
R8M
R8Ph
R8C
R8A
R8Cy
R9M
R9Ph
R9C
R9A
R9Cy
Youngs modulus
[MPa][a]
Tensile strength[b]
[MPa]
Elongation
at break [%]
Dielectric permittivity,
e0 (at 10 kHz)
Dielectric loss,
e00 (at 10 kHz)
0.098
0.680
0.723
0.378
0.948
0.062
0.087
0.375
0.155
0.320
0.32
1.20
0.63
0.28
2.14
0.17
0.08
0.17
0.11
0.20
640
361
180
119
247
918
388
141
470
176
2.5
2.8
3.1
3.2
3.7
2.8
2.9
3.1
3.1
3.3
0.0045
0.0034
0.0167
0.0441
0.0215
0.0037
0.0037
0.0121
0.0292
0.0124
[a]
Youngs modulus was calculated as a ratio between the stress and strain when the latter is 10%. Linear stress-strain dependence is considered on this region of the
curve.
[b]
Corresponding for the value of elongation at break.
Table 3. Calculated values of some physical parameters that influence dielectric constant.
Substituent
Dipole moment[a]
e0 (298 K)[b]
CH3
C6H5
(CH2)3-NH2
(CH2)3-Cl
(CH2)3-CN
0.22
1.30
2.44
2.86
2.92
2.40
2.51
2.70
2.39
2.72
159.82
208.56
149.20
163.99
151.39
87.27
123.59
82.15
88.89
80.60
[a]
[b]
http://www.aem-journal.com
FULL PAPER
FULL PAPER
http://www.aem-journal.com
FULL PAPER
Fig. 3. Experimental setup diagram for electromechanical actuation measurements a, and illustrative response of R8Cy sample at 500 V applied voltage b.
http://www.aem-journal.com
FULL PAPER
Fig. 4. The comparative values of displacement as a function of electric field expressed as V/mm thickness for the films based on PDMS crosslinked with different agents. (From
clarity as well as aesthetic reasons, the displacement axis of the chart was broken at 6000 nm while the displacement of the sample R8C reached 22311.10 nm, value that is specified
in Table 4 and taken into account in the further discussions.)
Sample
R8M
R8Ph
R8C
R8A
R8Cy
R9M
R9Ph
R9C
R9A
R9Cy
Film thickness
[mm]
Applied tension
[V/mm]
Total displacement
[nm]
Displacement,
at 500 V [nm/mm]
Displacement,
at 632 V [nm/mm]
0.57
0.70
0.60
n.d.
0.80
0.57
0.68
0.43
0.54
0.68
877.19
714.29
847.46
n.d.
632.91
877.19
735.29
1162.79
925.93
735.29
1005.63
955.82
22311.10
n.d.
2394.24
973.03
347.06
5458.04
1858.53
4657.68
1764
1365
37185
n.d.
2993
1707
510
12693
3442
6850
945
1051
30226
n.d.
2993
763
451
2591
1558
8037
http://www.aem-journal.com
FULL PAPER
Fig. 5. SEM images on cryo-fractured section: a- R8M; b- R9M; c R8Ph; d R9Ph; e R8C; f R9C; g R8A; h R9A; i R8Cy; j R9Cy.
http://www.aem-journal.com
FULL PAPER
10
http://www.aem-journal.com
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
http://www.aem-journal.com
11
FULL PAPER
[17] J. J. Chru ciel, E. Le niak, in Modification of Thermoplastics with Reactive Silanes and Siloxanes in Thermoplastic Elastomers (Eds: A. Z. El-Sonbati), InTech, Rijeka
2012.
[18] M. Cazacu, M. Marcu, Macromol. Rep. A 1995, 32, 1019.
[19] a) H. Mori, Int. J. Pol. Sci. 2012, 173624, 17 pp. b) P. P.
Pescarmona, T. Maschmeyer, Aust. J. Chem. 2001, 54,
583.
[20] Q. Lu, M. E. Mullins, MRS Proceedings 2012, 1400,
mrsf11-1400-s06-02.
[21] L. Y. Tyng, M. R. Ramli, M. B. H. Othman, R. Ramli,
Z. Arifin, M. Ishak, Z. Ahmad, Polym. Int. 2012, 62,
382.
[22] a)G. Sauvet, W. Fortuniak, K. Kazmierski, J. Chojnowski, J. Polym. Sci: Part A: Polym. Chem. 2003, 41, 2939.