Levi Jones
People experience pain and suffering throughout their life. Many professions and
fields have each sought ways to understand and provide relief from this pervading
problem. It has long been a subject of debate among scholars, philosophers, and
theologians. The basic question arises: “How can a loving God allow pain and
suffering.” Could a good God allow such evil to exist? How might we best understand
Disease, destruction, and death surround us on all sides. Physical and emotional
pain marks our journey constantly throughout our existence. How can God, who is
omnipotent, allow us to suffer such pain and agony? Can He really be an all-loving God?
Or, is there even a God? For Freud this fact illustrated that there could not be a God.
Rather, life was simply cruel reality and God was a way for people to find relief. Freud
believed that this viewpoint kept people from accepting the true nature of life. He
surmised that it was best to accept life’s lot and to suffer through, for one could not fight
fate. For Freud, pain was an unnecessary problem. Yet, at times, one gets the feeling
Freud believed in God’s existence but rather blamed Him for the pain experienced.
Yet, one thing lacks in Freud’s account of God. Generally, throughout history,
gods have been portrayed in the likeness of man. That is to say, the mythological gods
have been shown to be cruel, selfish, disinterested, and lustful. However, there is
something particularly unique about the Judeo-Christian God. He is not made in the
image of man. Rather, man was made in the image of God, which has become twisted
2
and defiled. All of this goes to say, if God is a figment of mankind’s musings then it is
not very realistic in view of the chaos in the world that surrounds us. How might one
account for this discrepancy? Where early Jewish communities naïve? Unlikely,
considering Israel’s bitter history lived in enslavement and exile. So, we must conclude
two possibilities: early Jews were truly depraved or there is a God that exists, whose good
confrontation with the reality of pain and death, Lewis eventually found comfort with
God. Granted, he wrestled with the same concepts as Freud. However, Lewis came to
see the problem of pain as the result of sinfulness and the fallen state of creation that
resulted. Moreover, he asked if pain was necessary. Lewis likened God to a surgeon,
saying, “The kinder and more conscientious he is, the more inexorably he will go on
cutting. If he yielded to your entreaties, if he stopped before the operation was complete,
all the pain up to that point would have been useless” (Nicholi 202). In fact, Lewis saw
pain as a purifying process that causes us to rely on God more. So, how might we
C. S. Lewis wrote concerning pain, “Well, take your choice. The tortures occur.
If they are unnecessary, then there is no God or a bad one. If there is a good God, then
these tortures are necessary. For not even a moderately good Being could possibly inflict
or permit them if they weren’t” (202). From a Judeo-Christian perspective, God is good
and loving. As such, how can we reconcile this seemingly contradictory reality? Can
pain exist and God really being a loving and good God? Let us go to the Creation
When God began creating the world, everything that was created was “good”
(Gen. 1:4, 10, 12, 18, 21, 25). At the culmination of creation, God pronounces it all to be
“very good” (v. 31). So, what went terribly wrong to bring about such tortures that
permeate our entire existence? How did this “good” creation become so distorted from
God created humans, Adam and Eve, to govern over the Garden of Eden. There
was only one stipulation in this paradise: do not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good
and evil. Adam and Eve could eat from any tree save this one. This one choice allowed
for free choice from the humans. They could choose to live in obedience or disregard
God’s command. Unfortunately, Adam and Eve both took of the fruit they had been told
not to eat and consumed it. The result was banishment from the Garden, the land was
It must be said that evil is not a thing but an improper arrangement of good things
which are used in wrong relationship. Understood this way, sin and evil are not invasion
of an outside source but rather the corruption of God’s good design. Sin is simply a
violation of relationship. Pride sets itself above God and His designs. Chaos, violence,
suffering, and death are the ultimate products of such a world. We can see these
mechanisms at work developing and perpetuating entropic patterns we find in our world.
Genesis 3:17 states, “…cursed is the ground because of you.” Sin does not only hold a
spiritual repercussion but often is associated with physical outcomes. Does that mean
4
natural disaster is a part of this entropy? Can disease be counted in this same category?
What about the disruption of relationships? What about death itself? Simply put, yes.
God does not cause natural disasters, disease, or death. However, Creation, as a result of
the sinful decisions, does not function as it properly should. The result is chaos, for both
the righteous and the unrighteous. The impact of sin does not discriminate.
As Genesis progresses, one cannot help but notice the deteriorating state of
humanity. Murder, violence, and pain have increased exponentially. God’s original plan
in creation did not call for suffering and death. Rather, it was a world marked by life in
unequivocal measure. When sin entered the world due to humanity’s decisions, creation
became a broken semblance of its initial splendor and glory. Chaos threatened the order
once established. The image and likeness of God that had previously been found in
creation now lay shattered. Creation had become bent on destruction rather than on the
This sinfulness on the part of man reaches a crescendo. Genesis 6:13 reads, “And
God said to Noah, ‘I have determined to make an end of all flesh, for the earth is filled
with violence because of them; now I am going to destroy them along with the earth.”
measure! The result is chaos, nature collapsing in on itself in the form of rain. The
boundaries God had created to sustain life fall apart and result in death. Yet, despite this
turn, God extends mercy. God saves Noah and his family because of Noah’s
righteousness (Gen. 7:1). Yet, even after the flood, humanity remains bent on evil (Gen.
8:21). How does God respond? God limits His own power by promising to never
destroy the earth in the same way (Gen. 9:8). God is dedicated to the restoration of His
5
good Creation!
The Powers
Colossians 1:15-17 states, “He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of
all creation. For in him were created all things, those in heaven and those on earth,
visible and invisible; whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers; all was
created through him and by him. And he is before all things, and all things subsist in
him.” When God created the heavens and the earth, He separated the various parts of
creation. In each of these spheres, powers were given governance over that part of
creation. These powers were designed to order, maintain, and structure creation so that it
might give life and work within the boundaries of God’s design. These powers were not
given control for their own ends. Their first purpose was a measure of stewardship in
which they shepherded God’s good world. However, the result of the sin entering the
world twisted these powers. Their telos, since sin entered the world, has not always
conformed to God’s purposes. These structures or governments often deceive and entrap
humanity. Death and destruction often ensue as people participate in these broken
systems.
such, we are empowered by God through Jesus to live authentically free lives apart from
the Powers. What we had previously accepted as life we have come to see as death.
“The cross has disarmed them: wherever it is preached, the unmasking and the disarming
Augustine wrote, “…the nature of either the soul or the body, which God created:
it is wholly good. But we do say that our nature has been perverted by the human’s own
will and cannot be made whole without the grace of God” (Bassett 172). If God exists,
pain is the outcome of our sinfulness. If God does not exist, we are still left with the
problem of pain. If that is true, pain still results because of us and we have no real power
to stop it. It is our true nature if this presupposition holds. Death is all that there is in
Yet, who lives as if this premise were true? Experience teaches us that we do not
believe this, no matter how much we might argue its validity. Our very natures point to
something Outer and Other, which gives meaning and Life. Moreover, one would not
object to pain as being normal if we did not sense that life is not intended to be this way.
References
7
Bassett, Paul M., Holiness Teaching: New Testament Times to Wesley Vol. 1. Kansas
Harrelson, Walter J., Donald Senior, and Abraham Smith, eds. The New Interpreter's
Study Bible: New Revised Standard Version with the Apocrypha. New York:
Abingdon P, 2005.
Nicholi, Jr., Armand M., The Question of God: C. S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud Debate
God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life. New York: Free Press, 2002.
Yoder, John Howard. The Politics of Jesus 2nd Ed. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans