7040 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
30 / Wednesday, February 14, 2007 / Notices
bank’s records. This program should
include a requirement to install security
devices and should establish procedures
that satisfy minimum standards in the
regulation, with the security officer
determining the need for additional
security devices and procedures based
on the location of the banking office.
There is no formal reporting form and
the information is not submitted to the
Federal Reserve.
Current Actions: On December 4,
2006, the Federal Reserve published a
notice in the Federal Register (71 FR
70392) requesting public comment for
60 days on the extension, without
revision, of the Written Security
Program for State Member Banks. The
comment period for this notice expired
on February 2, 2007. The Federal
Reserve did not receive any comments.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, February 8, 2007.
Jennifer J. Johnson
Secretary of the Board
[FR Doc. E7–2484 Filed 2–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The application also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PRELIMS
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Additional information on all bank
holding companies may be obtained
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:27 Feb 13, 2007 Jkt 211001
from the National Information Center
website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than March 13,
2007.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
(Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs
Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis,
Missouri 63166-2034:
1. Cabool State Bank Employee Stock
Ownership Plan, Cabool, Missouri; to
acquire an additional 2 percent of the
voting shares, for total ownership of
30.36 percent, of Cabool Bancshares,
Inc., Cabool, Missouri, and thereby
indirectly acquire Cabool State Bank,
Cabool, Missouri.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, February 9, 2007.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7–2517 Filed 2–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration on Aging
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request;
Alzheimer’s Disease Demonstration
Grants to States Program Standardized
Data Collection
AGENCY: Administration on Aging, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Administration on Aging
(AoA) is announcing that the proposed
collection of information listed below
has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Submit written comments on the
collection of information by March 16,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on the collection of information by fax
202.395.6974 or by mail to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, New Executive Office Bldg., 725
17th St. NW., rm. 10235, Washington,
DC 20503, Attn: Carolyn Lovett, Desk
Officer for AoA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori
Stalbaum at 202–357–3452 or e-mail:
lori.stalbaum@aoa.hhs.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, AoA
has submitted the following proposed
PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
The Alzheimer’s Disease
Demonstration Grants to States
(ADDGS) Program is authorized through
Sections 398, 399 and 399A of the
Public Health Service (PHS) Act, as
amended by Public Law 101–557 Home
Health Care and Alzheimer’s Disease
Amendments of 1990. The ADDGS
program funded through AoA helps
states extend family support services
provided by subgrantees to underserved
populations, including those in rural
communities.
The PHS Act requires AoA to
‘‘provide for an evaluation of each
demonstration project for which a grant
is made.’’ The PHS Act further states
that ‘‘not later than 6 months after the
completion of such evaluations, submit
a report to the Congress describing the
findings made as a result of the
evaluations.’’ In compliance with the
PHS Act, AoA developed a new State
data collection protocol that will require
future ADDGS state grantees (those
funded starting in FY 2007) to transmit
annual data information to AoA
reported to the states by the project
partners.
Many of the elements for the ADDGS
Data Program Report are the same as
those collected for Older Americans Act
Title III and Title VII programs
administered by AoA. To ensure
inclusion of essential information the
ADDGS Project Officer first contacted
all current ADDGS grantees to find out
what type of information they are
already collecting. Then, the ADDGS
Project Officer solicited information on
key data elements from experts familiar
with the previous ADDGS Program
evaluation. Following this input,
modifications were made to the data
collection tool and input was solicited
from all ADDGS state Project Directors
and their project partners. Twenty-three
(23) of thirty-eight (38) states,
approximately 60% responded to the
request for feedback. Again,
modifications were made to fine tune
the data collection tool into a format
that would minimize burden on state
grantees. Finally, ten (10) ADDGS
Project Directors participated in a
telephone focus group. The ten Project
Directors were selected based on the
detail of their responses to the original
request for feedback.
The result of this input is the
proposed data collection tool and
accompanying definition of terms. AoA
is aware that different states have
different capabilities in terms of data
collection. Thus, it is understood that
following the approval of the proposed
ADDGS data collection tool, AoA will
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM 14FEN1