Anda di halaman 1dari 5

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

9 / Tuesday, January 16, 2007 / Notices 1779

Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 10 a.m.– Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Written comments may be submitted
11:30 a.m. Amendments to Facility Operating by mail to the Chief, Rulemaking,
The Subcommittee will discuss Licenses, Proposed No Significant Directives and Editing Branch, Division
proposed ACRS activities and related Hazards Consideration Determination, of Administrative Services, Office of
matters. The Subcommittee will gather and Opportunity for a Hearing Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
information, analyze relevant issues and The Commission has made a Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
facts, and formulate proposed positions proposed determination that the 0001, and should cite the publication
and actions, as appropriate, for following amendment requests involve date and page number of this Federal
deliberation by the full Committee. no significant hazards consideration. Register notice. Written comments may
Members of the public desiring to Under the Commission’s regulations in also be delivered to Room 6D22, Two
provide oral statements and/or written 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation White Flint North, 11545 Rockville
comments should notify the Designated of the facility in accordance with the Pike, Rockville, Maryland, from 7:30
Federal Official, Mr. Sam Duraiswamy a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays.
proposed amendment would not (1)
(telephone: 301–415–7364) between Copies of written comments received
involve a significant increase in the
7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (ET) five days prior may be examined at the Commission’s
probability or consequences of an
to the meeting, if possible, so that Public Document Room (PDR), located
accident previously evaluated; or (2)
appropriate arrangements can be made. at One White Flint North, Public File
create the possibility of a new or
Electronic recordings will be permitted Area O1F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first
different kind of accident from any
only during those portions of the floor), Rockville, Maryland. The filing of
accident previously evaluated; or (3)
meeting that are open to the public. requests for a hearing and petitions for
involve a significant reduction in a
Further information regarding this leave to intervene is discussed below.
margin of safety. The basis for this Within 60 days after the date of
meeting can be obtained by contacting proposed determination for each publication of this notice, the licensee
the Designated Federal Official between amendment request is shown below. may file a request for a hearing with
7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (ET). Persons The Commission is seeking public respect to issuance of the amendment to
planning to attend this meeting are comments on this proposed the subject facility operating license and
urged to contact the above named determination. Any comments received any person whose interest may be
individual at least two working days within 30 days after the date of affected by this proceeding and who
prior to the meeting to be advised of any publication of this notice will be wishes to participate as a party in the
potential changes in the agenda. considered in making any final proceeding must file a written request
Dated: January 9, 2007. determination. Within 60 days after the for a hearing and a petition for leave to
Michael R. Snodderly, date of publication of this notice, the intervene. Requests for a hearing and a
Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW. licensee may file a request for a hearing petition for leave to intervene shall be
[FR Doc. E7–404 Filed 1–12–07; 8:45 am]
with respect to issuance of the filed in accordance with the
amendment to the subject facility Commission’s ‘‘Rules of Practice for
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
operating license and any person whose Domestic Licensing Proceedings’’ in 10
interest may be affected by this CFR Part 2. Interested persons should
NUCLEAR REGULATORY proceeding and who wishes to consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309,
COMMISSION participate as a party in the proceeding which is available at the Commission’s
must file a written request for a hearing PDR, located at One White Flint North,
Biweekly Notice; Applications and and a petition for leave to intervene. Public File Area 01F21, 11555 Rockville
Amendments to Facility Operating Normally, the Commission will not Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Licenses Involving No Significant issue the amendment until the Publicly available records will be
Hazards Considerations expiration of 60 days after the date of accessible from the Agencywide
publication of this notice. The Documents Access and Management
I. Background Commission may issue the license System’s (ADAMS) Public Electronic
Pursuant to section 189a. (2) of the amendment before expiration of the 60- Reading Room on the Internet at the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended day period provided that its final NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/
(the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory determination is that the amendment reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/. If a
Commission (the Commission or NRC involves no significant hazards request for a hearing or petition for
staff) is publishing this regular biweekly consideration. In addition, the leave to intervene is filed within 60
notice. The Act requires the Commission may issue the amendment days, the Commission or a presiding
Commission publish notice of any prior to the expiration of the 30-day officer designated by the Commission or
amendments issued, or proposed to be comment period should circumstances by the Chief Administrative Judge of the
issued and grants the Commission the change during the 30-day comment Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
authority to issue and make period such that failure to act in a Panel, will rule on the request and/or
immediately effective any amendment timely way would result, for example in petition; and the Secretary or the Chief
to an operating license upon a derating or shutdown of the facility. Administrative Judge of the Atomic
determination by the Commission that Should the Commission take action Safety and Licensing Board will issue a
such amendment involves no significant prior to the expiration of either the notice of a hearing or an appropriate
hazards consideration, notwithstanding comment period or the notice period, it order.
the pendency before the Commission of will publish in the Federal Register a As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a
a request for a hearing from any person. notice of issuance. Should the petition for leave to intervene shall set
This biweekly notice includes all Commission make a final No Significant forth with particularity the interest of
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

notices of amendments issued, or Hazards Consideration Determination, the petitioner in the proceeding, and
proposed to be issued from December any hearing will take place after how that interest may be affected by the
22, 2006 to January 4, 2007. The last issuance. The Commission expects that results of the proceeding. The petition
biweekly notice was published on the need to take this action will occur should specifically explain the reasons
January 3, 2007 (72 FR 147). very infrequently. why intervention should be permitted

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Jan 12, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM 16JAN1
1780 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 9 / Tuesday, January 16, 2007 / Notices

with particular reference to the the amendment. If the final Nuclear Management Company, LLC,
following general requirements: (1) The determination is that the amendment Docket Nos. 50–266 and 50–301, Point
name, address, and telephone number of request involves a significant hazards Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2,
the requestor or petitioner; (2) the consideration, any hearing held would Town of Two Creeks, Manitowoc
nature of the requestor’s/petitioner’s take place before the issuance of any County, Wisconsin.
right under the Act to be made a party amendment. Date of amendment request:
to the proceeding; (3) the nature and A request for a hearing or a petition December 14, 2006.
extent of the requestor’s/petitioner’s for leave to intervene must be filed by: Description of amendment request:
property, financial, or other interest in (1) First class mail addressed to the The proposed amendments revise the
the proceeding; and (4) the possible Office of the Secretary of the technical specifications to add the
effect of any decision or order which Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory FERRET Code as an approved
may be entered in the proceeding on the Commission, Washington, DC 20555– methodology for determining reactor
requestor’s/petitioner’s interest. The 0001, Attention: Rulemaking and coolant system pressure and
petition must also set forth the specific Adjudications Staff; (2) courier, express temperature limits.
contentions which the petitioner/ mail, and expedited delivery services: Basis for proposed no significant
requestor seeks to have litigated at the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, hazards consideration determination:
proceeding. One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the
Each contention must consist of a Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, licensee has provided its analysis of the
specific statement of the issue of law or Attention: Rulemaking and issue of no significant hazards
fact to be raised or controverted. In Adjudications Staff; (3) E-mail consideration which is presented below:
addition, the petitioner/requestor shall addressed to the Office of the Secretary, 1. Operation of the Point Beach Nuclear
provide a brief explanation of the bases U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Plant in accordance with the proposed
for the contention and a concise HearingDocket@nrc.gov; or (4) facsimile amendments does not result in a significant
statement of the alleged facts or expert transmission addressed to the Office of increase in the probability or consequences
opinion which support the contention of any accident previously evaluated.
the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory The proposed change revises Technical
and on which the petitioner/requestor Commission, Washington, DC,
intends to rely in proving the contention Specification (TS) 5.6.5, ‘‘Reactor Coolant
Attention: Rulemakings and System (RCS) Pressure and Temperature
at the hearing. The petitioner/requestor Adjudications Staff at (301) 415–1101, Limits Report (PTLR)’’, to add the FERRET
must also provide references to those verification number is (301) 415–1966. Code as an approved methodology for
specific sources and documents of A copy of the request for hearing and determining RCS pressure and temperature
which the petitioner is aware and on petition for leave to intervene should limits.
which the petitioner/requestor intends also be sent to the Office of the General The proposed change does not adversely
to rely to establish those facts or expert affect accident initiators or precursors nor
Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory alter the design assumptions, conditions, or
opinion. The petition must include
Commission, Washington, DC 20555– the manner in which the plant is operated
sufficient information to show that a
0001, and it is requested that copies be and maintained. The proposed change does
genuine dispute exists with the
transmitted either by means of facsimile not alter or prevent the ability of structures,
applicant on a material issue of law or
transmission to (301) 415–3725 or by e- systems, and components from performing
fact. Contentions shall be limited to their intended function to mitigate the
mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. A copy
matters within the scope of the consequences of an initiating event within
of the request for hearing and petition
amendment under consideration. The the assumed acceptance limits. Therefore, the
for leave to intervene should also be
contention must be one which, if proposed change does not significantly
sent to the attorney for the licensee.
proven, would entitle the petitioner/ increase the probability of any accident
requestor to relief. A petitioner/ Nontimely requests and/or petitions previously evaluated.
requestor who fails to satisfy these and contentions will not be entertained There will be no change to normal plant
requirements with respect to at least one absent a determination by the operating parameters, engineered safety
Commission or the presiding officer of feature actuation setpoints, accident
contention will not be permitted to
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board mitigation capabilities, or accident analysis
participate as a party. assumptions or inputs. The proposed change
Those permitted to intervene become that the petition, request and/or the
does not affect the source term, containment
parties to the proceeding, subject to any contentions should be granted based on
isolation, or radiological release assumptions
limitations in the order granting leave to a balancing of the factors specified in 10 used in evaluating the radiological
intervene, and have the opportunity to CFR 2.309(a)(1)(i)–(viii). consequences of an accident previously
participate fully in the conduct of the For further details with respect to this evaluated. Further, the proposed change does
hearing. action, see the application for not increase the types or amounts of
If a hearing is requested, and the amendment which is available for radioactive effluent that may be released
Commission has not made a final public inspection at the Commission’s offsite, nor significantly increase individual
determination on the issue of no PDR, located at One White Flint North, or cumulative occupational/public radiation
exposures.
significant hazards consideration, the Public File Area 01F21, 11555 Rockville Therefore, the probability or consequences
Commission will make a final Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. of any accident previously evaluated will not
determination on the issue of no Publicly available records will be be significantly increased as a result of the
significant hazards consideration. The accessible from the ADAMS Public proposed change.
final determination will serve to decide Electronic Reading Room on the Internet 2. Operation of the Point Beach Nuclear
when the hearing is held. If the final at the NRC Web site, http:// Plant in accordance with the proposed
determination is that the amendment www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. If amendments does not result in a new or
request involves no significant hazards you do not have access to ADAMS or if different kind of accident from any accident
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

previously evaluated.
consideration, the Commission may there are problems in accessing the The proposed change incorporates the
issue the amendment and make it documents located in ADAMS, contact FERRET Code as an approved methodology
immediately effective, notwithstanding the PDR Reference staff at 1 (800) 397– for determining RCS pressure and
the request for a hearing. Any hearing 4209, (301) 415–4737 or by e-mail to temperature limits. The change does not
held would take place after issuance of pdr@nrc.gov. impose any new or different requirements or

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Jan 12, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM 16JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 9 / Tuesday, January 16, 2007 / Notices 1781

eliminate any existing requirements. The would (1) relocate certain operating Limits are consistent with the values stated
proposed change is consistent with the safety cycle-specific parameters limits, in the FSAR [Final Safety Analysis Report for
analysis assumptions and current plant including TS Figure 2.1.1–1, ‘‘Reactor the Callaway Plant]. The proposed changes
operating practice. do not, by themselves, alter any of the
Core Safety Limits,’’ from the above TSs relocated limits. The removal of the cycle-
No new accident scenarios, transient
precursors, failure mechanisms, or limiting
to the plant COLR, (2) add two new specific parameter limits from the TS[s] does
single failures are introduced as a result of safety limits for departure from nucleate not eliminate existing requirements to
the proposed change. Equipment important boiling ratio (DNBR) and peak fuel comply with the parameter limits. [The value
to safety will continue to operate as designed. centerline temperature, and (3) add of the limits is relocated to the COLR, but the
The change does not result in any event several topical reports to TS 5.6.5 and requirement to follow that limit remains in
previously deemed incredible being made have the reports in TS 5.6.5 cited by the TSs by the reference to the limits or
credible. The change does not result in values in the COLR, and the values of the
only the report title and number. The
adverse conditions or result in any increase limits are not being changed by this
TSs would state that the limits to be met amendment.] TS 5.6.5.b continues to ensure
in the challenges to safety systems. or the values of denoted parameters are
Therefore, the proposed change does not that the analytical methods used to
create the possibility of a new or different
specified in the COLR. The existing TS determine the core operating limits meet
type of accident from any accident 5.6.5 has seven core operating limits NRC reviewed and approved methodologies
previously evaluated. that are listed in the specification, and [by the requirement stated in TS 5.6.5.b that
3. Operation of the Point Beach Nuclear this would be expanded to include the ‘‘the analytical methods used to determine
Plant in accordance with the proposed three additional limits from TSs 2.1.1, the core operating limits shall be those
previously reviewed and approved by the
amendments does not result in a significant 3.3.1, and 3.4.1. The changes are NRC’’]. TS 5.6.5.c, [which is] unchanged by
reduction in a margin of safety. consistent with NRC-approved Standard this application, will continue to ensure that
The proposed change incorporates the Technical Task Force (TSTF) Traveler applicable limits of the safety analyses are
FERRET Code as an approved methodology TSTF–339, Revision 2, ‘‘Relocate TS met [by continuing to state this as a
for determining RCS pressure and requirement in the TSs].
temperature limits. The proposed change
Parameters to COLR,’’ and TSTF–363,
Revision 0, ‘‘Relocate Topical Report The proposed changes to reference only the
does not alter safety limits, limiting safety Topical Report number and title do not alter
system settings, or limiting conditions for References in ITS [Improved Technical
the use of the analytical methods used to
operation. The setpoints at which protective Specification] 5.6.5, COLR.’’ determine core operating limits that have
actions are initiated are not altered by the Basis for proposed no significant been reviewed and approved by the NRC.
proposed change. hazards consideration determination: [This remains a requirement stated in TS
There are no new or significant changes to As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the 5.6.5.b.] This [proposed] method of
the initial conditions contributing to accident licensee has provided its analysis of the referencing Topical Reports would allow the
severity or consequences. The proposed issue of no significant hazards use of current [NRC-approved] Topical
amendment will not otherwise affect the Reports to support [the] limits in the COLR
consideration, which is presented
plant protective boundaries, will not cause a without [the licensee] having to submit an
release of fission products to the public, nor below:
1. [Do] the proposed change[s] involve a amendment to the operating license.
will it degrade the performance of any other Implementation of revisions to Topical
significant increase in the probability or
structures, systems or components (SSCs) Reports for Callaway Plant applications
consequences of an accident previously
important to safety. Therefore, the requested would still be reviewed in accordance with
evaluated?
change will not result in a significant 10 CFR 50.59(c)(2)(viii) and, where required,
Response: No.
reduction in the margin of safety. Overall protection system performance will receive prior NRC review and approval. [The
The NRC staff has reviewed the remain within the bounds of the previously criteria in the regulation governing changes
performed accident analyses since there are to the plant without NRC approval, 10 CFR
licensee’s analysis and, based on this 50.59, would have to be met before the
review, it appears that the three no design [or equipment] changes. The
design of the reactor trip system (RTS) licensee could use a later version of an NRC-
standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are instrumentation and engineered safety approved Topical Report that is listed in TS
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff feature actuation system (ESFAS) 5.6.5.b.]
proposes to determine that the instrumentation will be unaffected and these The cycle-specific parameter limits being
amendment request involves no protection systems will continue to function transferred from the TS[s] to the COLR will
significant hazards consideration. in a manner consistent with the plant design continue to be controlled under existing
Attorney for licensee: Jonathan Rogoff, basis. All design, material, and construction programs and procedures. The FSAR
standards that were applicable prior to this accident analyses will continue to be
Esquire, Vice President, Counsel & examined with respect to future changes in
amendment request will be maintained.
Secretary, Nuclear Management The proposed changes will not adversely the cycle-specific parameters using NRC
Company, LLC, 700 First Street, affect accident initiators or precursors nor reviewed and approved reload design
Hudson, WI 54016. alter the design assumptions, conditions, and methodologies [(i.e., NRC reviewed and
NRC Acting Branch Chief: L. configuration of the facility or the manner in approved Topical Reports)], ensuring that the
Raghavan. which the plant is operated and maintained. evaluation of new reload designs under 10
Union Electric Company, Docket No. The proposed changes will not alter or CFR 50.59 is bounded by previously accepted
50–483, Callaway Plant, Unit 1, prevent the ability of structures, systems, and analyses.
components (SSCs) from performing their All accident analysis acceptance criteria
Callaway County, Missouri. will continue to be met with the proposed
intended [safety] functions to mitigate the
Date of amendment request: August consequences of an initiating event within changes. The proposed changes will not
17, 2006. the assumed acceptance limits. affect the source term, containment isolation,
Description of amendment request: The proposed changes are programmatic or radiological release assumptions used in
The amendment would revise Technical and administrative in nature. These changes evaluating the radiological consequences of
Specifications (TSs) 2.1.1, ‘‘Reactor Core do not physically alter safety-related systems an accident previously evaluated. The
SLs [Safety Limits],’’ 3.3.1, ‘‘Reactor nor affect the way in which safety-related proposed changes will not alter any
Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation,’’ systems perform their functions. Additional assumptions or change any mitigation actions
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Safety Limits on the DNB [departure from in the radiological consequence evaluations
3.4.1, RCS [reactor coolant system] nucleate boiling] design basis and peak fuel in the FSAR. The applicable radiological
Pressure, Temperature, and Flow centerline temperature are being imposed in dose acceptance criteria will continue to be
Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) TS 2.1.1, ‘‘Reactor Core Safety Limits,’’ and met.
Limits,’’ and 5.6.5, ‘‘Core Operating the Reactor Core Safety Limits figure is being [The proposed changes do not alter any
Limits Report (COLR).’’ The changes relocated to the COLR. The additional Safety requirements in the TSs, but they do add two

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Jan 12, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM 16JAN1
1782 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 9 / Tuesday, January 16, 2007 / Notices

new safety limits to TS 2.2.1. The changes of the acceptance criteria for any accident prepared an environmental assessment
also relocate certain limits or parameter analysis will be changed. under the special circumstances
values from the TSs to the COLR; however, The development of cycle-specific provision in 10 CFR 51.12(b) and has
these limits and values are still required to parameter limits for future reload designs
will continue to conform to NRC reviewed
made a determination based on that
be met and be determined from NRC-
approved methodologies that apply to the and approved methodologies, and will be assessment, it is so indicated.
Callaway Plant. Therefore, there are no performed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59 to For further details with respect to the
changes to accident analyses previously assure that plant operation [is] within [these] action see (1) the applications for
evaluated and described in the FSAR.] cycle-specific parameter limits. amendment, (2) the amendment, and (3)
Therefore, the proposed changes do not The proposed changes will have no impact the Commission’s related letter, Safety
involve a significant increase in the on the radiological consequences of a design Evaluation and/or Environmental
probability or consequences of an accident basis accident. Assessment as indicated. All of these
previously evaluated. [The proposed changes do not alter any
items are available for public inspection
2. [Do] the proposed change[s] create the requirements in the TSs. They relocate
possibility of a new or different kind of certain limits or parameter values from the at the Commission’s Public Document
accident from any accident previously TSs to the COLR; however, these limits and Room (PDR), located at One White Flint
evaluated? values are still required to be met and be North, Public File Area 01F21, 11555
Response: No. determined from NRC-approved Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
There are no proposed design changes nor methodologies that apply to the Callaway Maryland. Publicly available records
are there any changes in the method by Plant.] will be accessible from the Agencywide
which any safety-related plant SSC performs Therefore, the proposed changes do not Documents Access and Management
its safety function. Th[ese] change[s] will not involve a significant reduction in a margin of
Systems (ADAMS) Public Electronic
affect the normal method of plant operation safety.
Reading Room on the internet at the
or change any operating parameters. No The NRC staff has reviewed the
equipment performance requirements will be NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/
licensee’s analysis and, based on this reading-rm/adams.html. If you do not
affected. The proposed changes will not alter
any assumptions made in the safety analyses. review, it appears that the three have access to ADAMS or if there are
No new accident scenarios, transient standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are problems in accessing the documents
precursors, failure mechanisms, or limiting satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff located in ADAMS, contact the PDR
single failures will be introduced as a result proposes to determine that the Reference staff at 1 (800) 397–4209,
of this amendment. There will be no adverse amendment request involves no (301) 415–4737 or by e-mail to
effect or challenges imposed on any safety- significant hazards consideration. pdr@nrc.gov.
related system as a result of this amendment. Attorney for licensee: John O’Neill, Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.
[No equipment is being added to the plant by Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Docket No. 50–305, Kewaunee Power
the amendment.] LLP, 2300 N Street, NW., Washington,
The proposed amendment will not alter the Station, Kewaunee County, Wisconsin.
DC 20037. Date of application for amendment:
design or performance of the 7300 Process
NRC Branch Chief: David Terao. September 25, 2006.
Protection System, Nuclear Instrumentation
System, or Solid State Protection System Notice of Issuance of Amendments to Brief description of amendment: The
used in the plant protection systems. Facility Operating Licenses amendment revises Technical
Relocation of cycle-specific parameter Specification (TS) 4.2.a, ‘‘ASME
limits has no influence on, nor does it During the period since publication of [American Society of Mechanical
contribute in any way to, the possibility of the last biweekly notice, the Engineers] Code Class 1, 2, 3, and MC
a new or different kind of accident. The Commission has issued the following Components and Supports.’’ The
relocated cycle-specific parameter limits will amendments. The Commission has revised TS 4.2.a.2, references the ASME
continue to be calculated using the NRC determined for each of these
reviewed and approved methodologies. The
Code for Operation and Maintenance of
amendments that the application Nuclear Power Plants.
proposed changes do not alter assumptions complies with the standards and
made in the safety analyses. Operation Date of issuance: December 14, 2006.
within the core operating limits will continue
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act Effective date: As of the date of
to be observed. of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the issuance and shall be implemented
Therefore, the proposed changes do not Commission’s rules and regulations. within 60 days.
create the possibility of a new or different The Commission has made appropriate Amendment No.: 189
accident from any accident previously findings as required by the Act and the Facility Operating License No. DPR–
evaluated. Commission’s rules and regulations in 43: Amendment revised the Technical
3. [Do] the proposed change[s] involve a 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in Specifications.
significant reduction in a margin of safety? the license amendment. Date of initial notice in Federal
Response: No. Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Register: October 24, 2006 (71 FR
There will be no effect on those plant Amendment to Facility Operating 62308).
systems necessary to assure the
accomplishment of protection functions.
License, Proposed No Significant The Commission’s related evaluation
There will be no impacts on the overpower Hazards Consideration Determination, of the amendment is contained in a
limit, departure from nucleate boiling ratio and Opportunity for A Hearing in Safety Evaluation dated December 14,
(DNBR) limits, heat flux hot channel factor connection with these actions was 2006.
(FQ), nuclear enthalpy rise hot channel factor published in the Federal Register as No significant hazards consideration
(FDH), loss of coolant accident peak cladding indicated. comments received: No.
temperature (LOCA PCT), peak local power Unless otherwise indicated, the DukePower Company LLC, Docket
density, or any other margin of safety. The Commission has determined that these Nos. 50–369 and 50–370, McGuire
applicable radiological dose consequence amendments satisfy the criteria for Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2,
acceptance criteria will continue to be met. categorical exclusion in accordance Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

The proposed changes do not eliminate


any surveillances or alter the frequency of
with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant Date of application for amendments:
surveillances [(i.e., the surveillance test to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental December 20, 2005, as supplemented
intervals)] required by the Technical impact statement or environmental May 4 and August 31, 2006.
Specifications. The nominal RTS and ESFAS assessment need be prepared for these Brief description of amendments: The
trip setpoints will remain unchanged. None amendments. If the Commission has amendments revised the McGuire 1 and

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Jan 12, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM 16JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 9 / Tuesday, January 16, 2007 / Notices 1783

2 licensing basis to adopt a selective proposed finding of no significant SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
implementation of the alternative source hazards consideration. COMMISSION
term radiological analysis methodology. The Commission’s related evaluation
The amendments also revised Technical of the amendments is contained in a [Release No. 34–55045; File No. SR–Amex–
Specification 3.9.4, ‘‘Containment Safety Evaluation dated December 19, 2007–02]
Penetrations.’’
2006.
Date of issuance: December 22, 2006. Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Effective date: As of the date of No significant hazards consideration American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice
issuance and shall be implemented comments received: No. of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
within 30 days from the date of Virginia Electric and Power Company, of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
issuance. Docket Nos. 50–338 and 50–339, North Options Fee Changes
Amendment Nos.: 236, 218 Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2,
Renewed Facility Operating License Louisa County, Virginia. January 5, 2007.
Nos. NPF–9 and NPF–17: Amendments Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
revised the licenses and the technical Date of application for amendment:
May 30, 2006, as supplemented by letter Securities Exchange Act of 1934
specifications. (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
Date of initial notice in Federal dated June 30, 2006.
notice is hereby given that on January 4,
Register: August 24, 2006 (71 FR Brief description of amendment: The 2007, the American Stock Exchange LLC
50105) proposed amendments would relocate (‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
The supplements dated May 4 and the American Society for Testing and Securities and Exchange Commission
August 31, 2006, provided additional Materials (ASTM) standard being used (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
information that clarified the to test the total particulate concentration change as described in Items I, II, and
application, did not expand the scope of of the stored fuel oil to the Technical III below, which Items have been
the application as originally noticed, Specification (TS) Bases. This proposed substantially prepared by the Amex.
and did not change the staff’s original change is described in TS Task Force The Amex has designated this proposal
proposed no significant hazards (TSTF) Standard TS Change Traveler as one establishing or changing a
consideration determination. TSTF–374, Rev. 0, ‘‘Revision to TS member due, fee, or other charge
The Commission’s related evaluation 5.5.13 and Associated TS Bases for imposed by a self-regulatory
of the amendments is contained in a Diesel Fuel Oil.’’ In addition, the organization pursuant to Section
Safety Evaluation dated.
licensee has proposed to use a ‘‘water 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–
No significant hazards consideration
and sediment test’’ instead of the ‘‘clear 4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which renders the
comments received: No.
and bright’’ test provided in TSTF–374. proposal effective upon filing with the
Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Commission. The Commission is
Docket Nos. 50–373 and 50–374, LaSalle Date of issuance: December 11, 2006.
publishing this notice to solicit
County Station, Units 1 and 2, LaSalle Effective date: As of the date of comments on the proposed rule change
County, Illinois. issuance and shall be implemented from interested persons.
Date of application for amendments: within 30 days from the date of
December 9, 2004, as supplemented by issuance. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
letters dated August 16, August 24, Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Amendment Nos.: 249, 229.
September 13, and October 12, 2006. the Proposed Rule Change
Brief description of amendments: The Renewed Facility Operating License
amendments adopt Technical Nos. NPF–4 and NPF–7: Amendments The Amex proposes to modify its
Specification Task Force (TSTF) change the licenses and the technical Options Fee Schedule. The text of the
Standard Technical Specification (STS) specifications. proposed rule change is available at the
Change Traveler 360 (TSTF–360), Amex, on the Amex’s Web site at
Date of initial notice in Federal
Revision 1, ‘‘DC Electric Rewrite.’’ The http://www.amex.com, and at the
Register: August 15, 2006 (71 FR
amendment revised Technical Commission’s Public Reference Room.
46941)
Specification (TS) Section 3.8.4, ‘‘DC II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Sources-Operating,’’ TS 3.8.5, ‘‘DC The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendments is contained in a Statement of the Purpose of, and
Sources-Shutdown,’’ TS 3.8.6, ‘‘Battery Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Cell Parameters,’’ and adds a new TS Safety Evaluation dated December 11,
2006. Change
Section 5.5.14, ‘‘Battery Monitoring and
Maintenance Program.’’ No significant hazards consideration In its filing with the Commission, the
Date of issuance: December 19, 2006. comments received: No. Amex included statements concerning
Effective date: As of the date of the purpose of, and basis for, the
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day
issuance and shall be implemented of January 2007. proposed rule change and discussed any
within 60 days. comments it received on the proposal.
Amendment Nos.: 179/165. For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
The text of these statements may be
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF– John W. Lubinski, examined at the places specified in Item
11 and NPF–18: The amendments Deputy Director, Division of Operating IV below. The Exchange has prepared
revised the Technical Specifications and Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
License. Regulation. and C below, of the most significant
Date of initial notice in Federal [FR Doc. E7–321 Filed 1–12–07; 8:45 am]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

aspects of such statements.


Register: April 12, 2005 (70 FR 19115) BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
The August 16, August 24, September 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
13, and October 12, 2006 supplements 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
contained clarifying information and 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).

did not change the NRC staff’s initial 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Jan 12, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM 16JAN1