Anda di halaman 1dari 107

Civil Engineering

Design Practice A
CVEN4002
Pritchard Street Bridge

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 2
Revision No: 0

REVISION RECORD
Author:
Date

Pages
Affected
All

Rev No
0

Reviewed by:
Description of Change

Approved by

Preliminary Issue substructure


only

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 3
Revision No: 0

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
1.3

2.

Scope of report.....4
Definitions..........4
Design Method4

DESIGN INPUTS
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6

Application, function and design life5


Geometry 5
Loading.6
Load Factors and Combinations..6
Concrete and Reinforcement Properties..6
Foundation Properties7

3. CALCULATIONS
3.1

Substructure.7

4. DESIGN OUTPUTS
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4

General..19
Finite Element Analysis Results 19
Reinforcement Design.19
Design Output Index.19

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A :
Attachment B :
Attachment C :
Attachment D :
Attachment E :
Attachment F :
Attachment G :

Substructure frame model


Substructure computer output
Substructure design and details
Deck structure computer model
Deck structure computer output
Deck structure design and details
Quantities and cost estimate

In Attachments C and F include cross sections for each element of the structure showing
dimensions and reinforcement arrangement with sufficient detail for a drafter to prepare the
construction drawings.

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
1.0

INTRODUCTION

1.1

Scope of report

Page No: 4
Revision No: 0

The information and calculations provided herewith is for the following project:
CVEN 4002 Design Practice A Bridge Design
The Port of Brisbane Motorway is a highway situated along the length of Lindum Road to
Pritchard Street, acting as a connection between the Port of Brisbane and the Gateway
Motorway. An increase in vehicles travelling towards the Port of Brisbane in 2002 led to the
construction of the Pritchard Street Overpass (Pritchard Street Bridge), in an attempt to
reduce freight traffic off Lytton Road.
A detailed design procedure and requirements for the design of the four span bridge; the
Pritchard Street Bridge, will be covered in this report. The design procedure will cover the
pier foundations, columns, headstock and bridge deck which will be primarily supported by
Super-T4 Girders.
The project will be divided into two phases, whereby initial preliminary designs were made
by analysing the substructure of the bridge which took into account geotechnical properties
present at the bridge site. These geotechnical properties combined with foundation
parameters enabled and assisted the design of the footings of the bridge, which will be
discussed in further detail below. Furthermore, the bridge piers and deck were modelled
using Strand7 structural analysis software, where worst case scenarios were designed for.
Through the assumption of the most extreme load cases occurring, such cases were adopted
for the design of Pritchard Street Bridge.
References will be made to the Australian Standards which include:
- AS5100 (2004) Bridge Design
- AS1170 Structural Design Actions
- AS3600 (2009) Concrete Structures.
And references to Super-T Standards (1997) by Structural Concrete Industries,
http://www.sciaust.com.au/pdfs/supertstandards.pdf
Concrete Structures (1998) by R.F. Warner, B.V. Rangan, A.S. Hall, K.A. Faulkes.

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
1.2

Page No: 5
Revision No: 0

Definitions
These definitions were taken from AS5100.3 Clause 23.2:
ULS Ultimate Limit State is the loss of inelastic instability, static equilibrium and failure to
further sustain the design load.
SLS Serviceability Limit State is defined as the excessive vibration from lateral or cross wind
effects induced by vortex shredding which leads to failure or fatigue of electrical
components and other functional problems. The critical wind speed where the frequency of
vortex shedding equals a structure resonance frequency must be greater than the maximum
serviceability design wind speed or low enough to only produce very small vibratory
amplitudes.
SDL A Superimposed Dead Load is applied to a bridge after the concrete deck has cured.
DNA - Depth to Neutral Axis
TL - Transverse load

1.3

Design Method
The verification has made use of the following finite element analysis programme:
Name:
Author:

Strand7 Release 2.4.5


Strand7 Pty Ltd
Sydney NSW

Name:
Author:

Microsoft Excel 2010


Microsoft

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
2.0

Design Inputs

2.1

Application, function exposure classification and design life

Page No: 6
Revision No: 0

The bridge design is for a flyover (overhead bridge) on the Port of Brisbane Motorway near
Lytton, Pritchard Street and the entrance to the Brisbane River. Due to the fact that the
bridge is located close to the water, there are risks of corrosion. The bridge is also exposed
to pollution from the Caltex Oil Refinery nearby.
The design life of the bridge is for 100 years. Using appropriate steel reinforcement that can
hold the dead load of the bridge and the live loads from traffic on the road and sufficient
cover that will not be easily weakened by the mentioned elements, it is possible to design a
bridge which can withstand for 100 years with low maintenance costs.
For the substructure, AS5100.5 Table 4.3 and Table 4.5 listed below states that for surface of
members in seawater within tidal zones are considered as Exposure Class C with a minimum
characteristic strength requirement (fc) of 50 MPa. The superstructure will be considered as
Exposure Class B2 with a minimum strength requirement of 40 MPa.

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 7
Revision No: 0

Table 4.10.3(A) specifies a minimum concrete cover of 70mm for the specified exposure
class C, which will be used for the substructure

Table 4.10.3(B) specifies a minimum concrete cover of 35mm for the exposure class B2,
which will be used for the superstructure (requires rigid formwork and intense compaction)

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 8
Revision No: 0

Concrete Class
Standard Grade 50 concrete (S50) shall be used in the construction of the substructure to
satisfy the characteristic strength mentioned previously. It shall also be used in the casting of
the deck slab and girder diaphragm.
The beam girders in the deck shall be of concrete class that is standard in the prefabrication
of Super-T4 girders.
Non-structural elements shall use S40 concrete.
Maximum Reinforcement Stresses under SLS Loads
The maximum allowable reinforcement stresses under SLS loads can be found in Table
8.6.1(A) and Table 8.6.2(B) of AS5100.5. For the designed bar diameter in each structural
element, the maximum stress in the steel was checked and verified that it did not exceed
the thresholds stated in the table. Further verification can be seen in substructure
calculations in Section 3.1 of this report.
To prevent cracking on the soffit of the girders, the maximum stresses that can be applied to
the Super T-4 girders shall be limited to its prestressed value. This is checked and calculated
in Section 3.0 and 4.3 of the report.
2.2

Geometry
The geometry of the structure and related earthworks is defined by the following project
drawings no. BR61-GA-01, BR61-DI-01, BR61-SN-01, BR61-GA-02, BR61-GA-03, 545750,
545751, BR61-AB-03, BR61-DK-01, BR61-DK-02, BR61-GI-01, BR61-RS-02. These drawings
can be found in the General Bridge Project CVEN4002 2014.pdf.
Deep piles and supports were initially used as foundation set ups. The load applied from the
bridge down to the deep piles is transferred to strata which is capable of supporting the
structure without failing during the designed life of the bridge.
Spread footing is the new type of foundation which replaces deep piles in the area
between the supports. This type of foundation spreads the load exerted by the building over
an area adequate enough to prevent the ground from being prestressed.

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 9
Revision No: 0

Our designed foundation is 3m in width, 55.559 metres in length and has a depth of 0.9m.
There will be three footings equally spread apart along the length of the bridge.
Circular columns will be used and would have a diameter of 900mm. The columns are
approximately 7 m in length each. Since there are three footings, there will be 18 columns in
total for the bridge.
The headstock has a depth of 1.7 m, a width of 2 m, and has a total length of 55.559 m. Like
the footings, there will be 3 headstocks for the entire length of the bridge.
2.3

Loading
The structure has been designed for the loading shown on drawings no:
BR61-GA-01 545750, 545751, BR61-AB-03, BR61-DK-02 and the lecture notes.
For strand7, six different load cases were considered:
-

2.4

Self-Weight (1): The self-weight of the bridge structure including the impact of gravity.
Dead Load (2): Constant static forces over time. E.g. Column
Live Load (3+4): Temporary or moving dynamic loads. E.g: road traffic. There are two live
loads considered separately from each other.
Superimposed Dead Load (5): differs from dead loads as they are not attached to the
building. E.g. pavement
Dead Load + Superimposed Dead Load (6): the addition of (2) and (5).

Load Factors and Combinations


AS5100.2 T5.2 was used to get the load factors. For Ultimate Limit State, dead loads were
multiplied by a load factor of 1.2 and the Serviceability limit state was multiplied by a factor
of 1. This is due to the fact that it is made of Concrete with a dead load which reduces
safety.
In the process of calculating, Superimposed Dead Load, a load factor of 2 was used from T5.3
for Ultimate Limit State where SDL is permanent and reduces safety. A load factor of 1.3 was
used for serviceability limit state.
For the live loads, a factor of 1.0 and 1.8 were used for SLS and ULS respectively. These live
loads were tested separately using different increments.
According to the standards, the dead load + superimposed dead load has a ULS factor of
0.05 and a SLS factor of 0.

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
2.5

Page No: 10
Revision No: 0

Concrete and Reinforcement Properties


S50 Concrete and N500 Steel were used. The concrete had compressive strength fc=50Mpa
and ductility 3.8x104 MPa.
The steel had a ductility class of N, a yield strength fsy = 500 Mpa and designation grade of
D500N from Table 6.2.1, AS5100.5. The elastic modulus E was 2x105 MPa.

2.6

Foundation Properties
The soil material properties assumed in the design are as follows:
The strength limit state is calculated as:
w = G + Q = (1900 + 540) + 1600 = 4040 kN
SLS Design for 1 metre strip:

w
= 673.333 kN
6
650 kNm
M=
= 108.333 kNm pmr
6m
F 6M 673.333 6(108.333)
= + 2=
+
= 296.667 kPa < 350
W W
3
32
F 6M 673.333 6(108.333)
qmin = 2 =

= 152.222 kPa
W W
3
32
F=

qmax

The allowable bearing pressure qallowable is 296.667 kPa. This satisfies the allowable
bearing pressure at foundation level shall be not less than 100 kPa and less than the soil
bearing capacity of 350 kPa.
3.0

CALCULATIONS
Strand7
Using the data from Pier Design Inputs, the substructure of the bridge was modelled on
Stand7. The concrete used and the structure material data was also input into the program.
In order for Stand7 to test for the worst case scenarios (i.e. the largest moments and axial
forces) different load cases were implemented on different increments. The load cases Live
Load 1, Live Load 2 and Dead Load + SDL were placed in different increments for the
different ultimate limit cases. A fourth increment included the ultimate limit state factors.
The factors for ULS and SLS are listed in section 2.4.
Strand7 analysed the data using a non-linear static solver and the results are presented in
Attachment B. They are from increment one which are the Ultimate Limit State calculations.
As expected, most values are within 10% of what is given in the lecture notes.

10

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 11
Revision No: 0

For the rest of the calculations, values from the lecture notes are used instead of what was
calculated from Strand7.

Footings
Using the dimensions of 1000 mm wide x 900 mm deep x 3000 mm long, the required reinforcement
to ensure that ULS design shear and bending, SLS design bending is satisfied.
Detailing was done based on Reinforced Concrete Basics and the requirements of AS3600.
The steps taken to design for the required transverse, longitudinal and the shear reinforcement is
shown below.

Location of Maximum Design Actions:


Column Area
Equivalent Square section side length

= 636173
= 798

mm2
mm2

*Effective depth at support: Assume


cover = 70 mm
transverse bars = 20 mm
longitudinal bars = 24 dia. Mm
= 900-70-20-24/2 = 798 mm2

Effective depth
Critical Section distance from column CL:
Bending at support: 015D from face
Shear at support: d from face

= 279
= 1197

X
Negative Bending moment (mid-span)
Positive bending moment
Distance from column CL
0.00
0.30
Design section
0.279
Shear Force
Distance from column CL
0.90
1.30
Design section
1.197

mm (from centre)
mm (from centre)

ULS

SLS DL + SLS DL only


LL
-764.6
-510.7
-383.5 kNm

2261.4
1107.3
1187.5
-1339.1
-579.3
-775.3

1548.8
749.2
804.7

1036.8 kNm
286.7 kNm
338.8 kNm
kN
kN
kN

11

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 12
Revision No: 0

ULS : Footing Shear Force Diagram


3000.0

Sher Force, kN

2000.0
1000.0

-15.000

-10.000

0.0
-5.000
0.000
-1000.0

5.000

10.000

15.000

-2000.0

ULS Min
Support

-3000.0

ULS Max
Support

-4000.0

ULS: Footing Bending Moment Diagram


2500.0
ULS Min Support

Bending Moment, kNm

2000.0

-15.000

ULS Max Support

1500.0

1000.0

500.0

-10.000

-5.000

0.0
0.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

-500.0

-1000.0

12

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 13
Revision No: 0

13

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Calculations

Page No: 14
Revision No: 0

Results/Reference

Footings Longitudinal Reinforcement Design


Minimum Strength Requirement
fc
fcf = 0.6 * fc0.5
D
B
Z = BD2/6
Assumed cover
Transverse
(Muo)min = 1.2 * Z * fcf

50 MPa
4.243 MPa
900 mm
3000 mm
4.05x108 mm3
70 mm
20 mm
2061.9 kNm

ULS bending moments retrieved from Strand 7 output


- At support (positive)
- At mid-span (negative)

1187.5 kNm
-764.6 kNm

Therefore (Muo)min governs

2061.9 kNm

Design for a metre width


M* = (Muo)min/3
Trial 24 mm diameter bottom bars and 20 mm diameter top bars
both at an equal spacing of 135 mm
Ast = r2 * 1/0.135
DNA
Rectangular stress block depth factor
= [0.85 0.007 * (fc 28)| 0.65 0.85]
Stress block depth
Ultimate stress = 0.85 * fc
Concrete force
Reinforcement force

687.31 kNm

3351 mm2/m (for 24 mm bars)


2327 mm2/m (for 20 mm bars)
73.58666364 mm
0.696
51.2 mm
42.5 MPa
2177 kN/m
-2177 kN/m

Satisfies F = 0; OK
Total Reinforcement moment about concrete centroid
= 0.8
Mu = 0.8 * 1328

1328 kN/m
1062.5 kN/m

Therefore Mu > M* is satisfied; OK

14

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 15
Revision No: 0

SLS reinforcement stresses


Case 1: SLS Design bending moment (DL +LL)
SLS design bending moment (DL + LL) = -510.7/3

-170.2 kN/m

This was used in combination with the following parameters:


- DNA
-
- E concrete
- E steel

130.409292 mm
0.00009453014
34800 MPa
200000 MPa

Concrete Force = Ec * DNA/2 *

215 kN/m

Reinforcement Force
Total Reinforcement Force

-215 kN/m

Satisfies F = 0; OK
Total Reinforcement Moment about concrete centroid

170 kN/m

Resultant moment > Applied moment; OK


- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under LL + DL; OK

97 MPa
210 MPa
292 MPa
292 MPa

Case 2: SLS Design bending moment (DL only)


- Maximum SLS bending moment (DL only)
- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL only; OK

-128 MPa
73 MPa
210 MPa
292 MPa
292 MPa

Check Shear Capacity


Design ULS Shear Force V*

258.44 kN/m

15

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 16
Revision No: 0

Strength excluding shear reinforcement, Vuc


1 = 1.1 * (1.6 - d0/1000) 1.1
2
3
bv
do
Ast
fc
Vuc = 1 * 2 * 3 * bv * d0 * ((Ast * f'c)/(bv * d0))(1/3)

1.1
1.0
1.0
1000 mm
800 mm
3351 mm2
50 MPa
522.6 kN/m

Shear strength of beam with minimum reinforcement


Vu.min = Vuc + 0.6 * bv * d0
= 0.7
Vu.min = 0.7 * 1002.6

1002.6 kN/m
701.8 kN/m

Vu > V*; OK
Minimum Shear Reinforcement
Asv.min = (0.35 * bv.s)/fsy.f
Shear reinforcement spacing
Provide 2 leg 16mm diameter/m width

500 mm

Minimum area required


Diameter
Number of legs

350 mm2/m
16 mm
2 per metre width

Area

402.1 mm2/m

Area > minimum area; OK

16

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 17
Revision No: 0

Columns
According to AS5100 (Cl 10.7.1 a), the minimum area of reinforcement steel needed is
0.01xAg which is 1% of the gross area of the cross section of the column. Since the gross
area of the column is x4502= 636 173 mm2, 1% of this area is 6 361 mm2. If we are using 16
bars, the minimum bar size which provides the required amount of area is N24. 16 bars are
used as it provides a symmetrical and consistent steel reinforcement throughout the circular
column.
The choice of very large diameter bars was not possible as according to AS5100 (Cl 10.7.1 b)
area of steel should be less than 0.04*Ag.
The helix confinement reinforcement used was 12mm from Table 10.7.3. whilst the cover of
70 mm was chosen. This results in our total side cover of 82mm. The choice of N24 bars
requires a minimum bar diameter of helix to be 10mm.
The analysis considers second order linear effects outlined in AS5100, Cl10.6 and Cl10.7
without an increase in the magnitude of moments due to the slenderness of the column
(Cl10.2.3).
The column design was finalised using the ULS Design Functions Excel file, where the
ultimate moment and axial force values were entered.
Values entered into the Ucom Input tab of the file were:
- Mu = 1785.4 kNm
- Axial load = 3887.8 kN
Also, the section details such as the layer depth remained unaltered as later on, it is shown
that these values were appropriated.
For the reinforcement, 16 N24 bars were used and placed /8 radians apart from each
other. As calculated above, the side cover is 82 mm. For steel, the Youngs modulus E is
2x105 MPa and the yield strength of steel is 500 MPa.
The interaction diagram provided by the Excel programme is provided in Appendix of
Submission 1. The diagram depicts the section capacity line of the column and the factor
reduced line.
The bending moment and axial force due to the design loads are given as M*=602.2 kNm
and N*= 3887.8 kN. These values are from Pier Design Results and are the ultimate limit
state bending moment at the top of the column. Since shear forces are almost constant
throughout the column, it is easier to design for the top of the column, where the axial force
is smallest. The ultimate limit state values are used rather than the serviceability limit state
values since they are larger and hence would represent the worst case scenario.
The interaction diagram shows that this point is within the reduced line and hence the
design of the column is safe.

17

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 18
Revision No: 0

This means that the choice of the diameter of the bars, the number of bars used and the
spacing is correct. Hence, the layer depth must also be sufficient for the designs.
Based on the Pier Design Results and ULS Design Function, the M* and N* are within the
reduced section capacity line and so the column design is safe as shown in the appendix;
Interaction Diagram
Headstock
Using the dimensions of 2000 mm wide x 1700 mm deep x 34000 mm long, the required
reinforcement to ensure that ULS design shear and bending, SLS design bending is satisfied.
Detailing was done based on the requirements of AS3600 and Reinforced Concrete Basics.
The development length, anchorage and curtailment were considered. The steps taken to
design for the required longitudinal and shear reinforcement can be shown in the appendix.

18

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Calculations

Page No: 19
Revision No: 0

Results/Reference

Headstock Longitudinal Reinforcement Design


Minimum Strength Requirement
fc
fcf = 0.6 * fc0.5
D
B
Z = BD2/6
Assumed Cover
Transverse

50 MPa
4.243 MPa
1700 mm
2000 mm
9.633x108 mm3
70 mm
24 mm

(Muo)min = 1.2 * Z * fcf

4904.5 kNm

ULS Bending Moment retrieved from Strand 7 Output


- At support
- At mid-span

3506.8kNm
1363.4kNm

Therefore (Muo)min governs

4904.5kNm

Design for a metre width


M* = (Muo)min/2

2452.35 kNm/m

Trial 24 mm diameter bars at 115 mm spacing


Ast = * (24/2)2 * 1/0.115

3934 mm2/m

DNA
Rectangular stress block depth factor
= [0.85 0.007 * (fc 28)| 0.65 0.85]

85.55861 mm

Stress block depth


Ultimate stress = 0.85 * fc
Concrete force
Reinforcement force

59.5 mm
42.5MPa
2531kN/m
-2531kN/m

0.696

Satisfies F = 0; OK
Total Reinforcement moment about concrete centroid
= 0.8
Mu = 0.8 * 3128

3128 kNm/m
2502kNm/m

19

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 20
Revision No: 0

SLS Reinforcement Stresses


Case 1: SLS Design bending moment (DL +LL)
SLS design bending moment (DL+LL) = 2347.8/2

1173.9kNm/m

This was used in combination with the following parameters;


- DNA
-
- E concrete
- E steel

233.259 mm
0.000260558
34800 MPa
200000 MPa

Concrete Force= Ec * DNA/2 *

1058 kN/m

Total Reinforcement Force

-1058 kN/m

Satisfies F = 0; OK
Total Reinforcement Moment about concrete centroid

1735 kNm/m

Resultant moment > Applied moment; OK


- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under LL + DL; OK

304 MPa
210 MPa
308 MPa
308 MPa

Case 2: SLS Design bending moment (DL only)


- Maximum SLS bending moment (DL only)
- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL only; OK

667 kNm/m
173 MPa
210 MPa
308 MPa
308 MPa

Check Shear Capacity


Design ULS Shear Force V*

1258.45 kN/m

20

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 21
Revision No: 0

Strength excluding shear reinforcement, Vuc


1 = 1.1 * (1.6-d0/1000) 1.1
2
3
bv
do
Ast
fc
Vuc = 1 * 2 * 3 * bv * d0 * ((Ast * f'c)/(bv * d0))(1/3)

1.1
1
1
1000 mm
1594 mm
3770 mm2
50 MPa
860.6 kN/m

Shear strength of beam with minimum reinforcement


Vu.min = Vuc + 0.6 * bv * d0
= 0.7
Vu.min = 0.7 * 1817

1817 kN/m
1271.9 kN/m

Vu > V*; OK
Minimum Shear Reinforcement
Asv.min = (0.35 * bv.s)/fsy.f
Shear reinforcement spacing
Provide 2 leg 16mm diameter/m width

500 mm

Minimum area required


Diameter
Number of legs

350mm2/m
16mm
2 per metre width

Area

402.1 mm2/m

Area > minimum area; OK

21

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 22
Revision No: 0

Results

Detailing the Slab reinforcement

Reference

Development Length for bar in tension

. =

7 8
(2 +

AS5011.5
Cl 13.1.2.1

251

K7 = 1 < 300mm of concrete cast below

k7 = 1

K8 = 2.2 for longitudinal bars in beams and columns with fitments

k8 = 2.2

AS5100.5
Cl 13.1.2.2 (b)

K8 is not equal to 1.6 as the clear distance between adjacent parallel bars is
less than 150 mm, where we determined the spacing to be 100 mm
Ab = cross sectional area of the reinforcing bar
Given:
N16 bars used
=

162
= 201.1 2
4

Ab = 201.1mm2

2a = twice the minimum cover to the deformed bar or the clear distance
between adjacent parallel bars developing stress
Minimum cover of 35 mm
2 * 35 = 70mm

2a = 70mm

Characteristic Compressive Strength of Concrete, fc


fc = 50 MPa
. =

1 2.2 500 201.1


(70 + 16) 50

= 363.76

25k1db = 25 * 1 * 16 = 400
Lsy.t < 25k1db therefore take 400

AS5011.5
Cl 13.1.2.1 (1)
Lsy.t = 400mm

22

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 23
Revision No: 0

Development length for bar in Compression


. =

7 8

251

(2 + )

K7 = 1.25
K8 = 2.2

K7 = 1.25 > 300 mm of concrete cast below

AS5011.5
Cl 13.1.2.1

K8 = 2.2 for longitudinal bars in beams and columns with fitments


Ab = cross-sectional area of the reinforcing bar
Given:
Ab = 201.1 mm2

N16 bars used

16
= 201.1 2
4

AS5100.5
13.1.2.2 (b)

2a = twice the minimum cover to the deformed bar or the clear distance
between adjacent parallel bars developing stress
Minimum cover of 35 mm
2a = 70 mm
2 * 35 = 70mm
Characteristic Compressive Strength of Concrete, fc
fc = 50 MPa
. =

1 2.2 500 201.1


(70 + 16) 50

= 363.76

25k1db = 25 * 1 * 16 = 400
Lsy.t = 455 mm
Lsy.t > 25k1db therefore take 454.7 mm
Reinforcement standards, bends, hooks and cogs
Using N16 bars
La = 170 mm
Minimum length for N16 is 4 * db = 4 * 16 = 64 mm

AS5100.5
F 13.1.2

La = 170 mm

23

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Negative Reo Design

Page No: 24
Revision No: 0

Results

Design for a metre width


M*

-779 kNm/m

Trial 24 mm diameter bars at 100mm spacing


Ast = r2 * 1/0.10

4524 mm2/m

DNA
Rectangular stress block depth factor
= [0.85 0.007 * (fc 28)| 0.65 0.85]

65.3 mm

Ultimate stress = 0.85 * fc


Stress block depth
Concrete force
Reinforcement force

42.5 MPa
45.2 mm
1923 kn/m
-1923 kN/m

0.696

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.1.2.2

Satisfies F = 0; OK
Total Reinforcement moment about concrete centroid
= 0.8
Mu = 0.8 * 1952.3

1952.3 kN/m
1561.84 kN/m

Therefore Mu > M* is satisfied; OK


SLS reinforcement stresses
Case 1: SLS Design bending moment (DL +LL)
SLS design bending moment (DL + LL)
This was used in combination with the following parameters:
- DNA
-
- E concrete
- E steel
Concrete Force = Ec * DNA/2 *

-477 kNm/m

178.5 mm
0.0002651
34800 MPa
200000 MPa
823 kN/m

Reinforcement Force
Total Reinforcement Force

-824kN/m

Satisfies F ~ 0; OK

24

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Total Reinforcement Moment about concrete centroid

Page No: 25
Revision No: 0

728 kNm/m

Resultant moment > Applied moment; OK

- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress


- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL + LL; OK

210 MPa
210 MPa
320 MPa
320 MPa

AS 5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

Case 2: SLS Design bending moment (DL only)


- Maximum SLS bending moment (DL only)
- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL only; OK

6 kNm/m
2 MPa
210MPa
320 MPa
320 MPa

AS 5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

Check Shear Capacity


Design ULS Shear Force V*

400.8 kN/m

Strength excluding shear reinforcement, Vuc


1 = 1.1 * (1.6 - d0/1000) 1.1
2
3
bv
do
Ast
fc
Vuc = 1 * 2 * 3 * bv * d0 * ((Ast * f'c)/(bv * d0))(1/3)

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.2

1.1
1.0
1.0
1000 mm
887 mm
4524 mm2
50 MPa
618.7 kN/m

Shear strength of beam with minimum reinforcement


Vu.min = Vuc + 0.6 * bv * d0
= 0.7
Vu.min = 0.7 * 274.1

1150.9 kN/m
805.7 kN/m

Vu > V*; OK
AS 5100.5
Cl 8.2.5 (a)

25

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 26
Revision No: 0

Minimum Shear Reinforcement


Asv.min = (0.35 * bv.s)/fsy.f

300

Spacing = min {300mm or 0.5D}


Shear reinforcement spacing
Provide 2 leg 16 mm diameter/m width
Minimum area required
Diameter
Number of legs
Area

210 mm2/m
12 mm
2 per metre
width

226.2 mm2/m

Area > minimum area; OK

26

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Calculations

Page No: 27
Revision No: 0

Results

Reference

End Diaphragm
Minimum Strength Requirement
fc
fcf = 0.6 * fc0.5
D
B
Z = BD2/6
Assumed cover
Stirrups
(Muo)min = 1.2 * Z * fcf

50 MPa
4.243 MPa
950 mm
1000 mm
1.504x108 mm3
35 mm
16 mm
765.8 kNm

ULS bending moments retrieved from Strand 7 output


- At support (positive)
- At mid-span (negative)

1240 kNm/m
-779.3 kNm/m

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.1.4

(Muo)min does not govern; design for positive and negative reo separately.
Positive Reo Design
Design for a metre width
M*
Trial 28 mm diameter bars at 100mm spacing
Ast = r2 * 1/0.10
DNA
Rectangular stress block depth factor
= [0.85 0.007 * (fc 28)| 0.65 0.85]
Ultimate stress = 0.85 * fc
Stress block depth
Concrete force
Reinforcement force
Reo force > Concrete force; OK

1240 kNm/m

6158 mm2/m
62.3 mm
0.696

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.1.2.2

42.5 MPa
45.2 mm
1923 kN/m
-3403 kN/m

Total Reinforcement moment about concrete centroid


= 0.8
Mu = 0.8 * 2689.4

2689.4 kN/m

Therefore Mu > M* is satisfied; OK

2151.52 kN/m

27

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 28
Revision No: 0

SLS reinforcement stresses


Case 1: SLS Design bending moment (DL +LL)
SLS design bending moment (DL + LL)

14.8 kNm/m

This was used in combination with the following parameters:


- DNA
-
- E concrete
- E steel

48.3981 mm
0.000553
34800 MPa
200000 MPa

Concrete Force = Ec * DNA/2 *

465 kN/m

Reinforcement Force
Total Reinforcement Force

-465 kN/m

Satisfies F ~ 0; OK
Total Reinforcement Moment about concrete centroid

55 kNm/m

Resultant moment > Applied moment; OK


- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL + LL; OK

211 MPa
280 MPa
320 MPa
320 MPa

AS 5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

Case 2: SLS Design bending moment (DL only)


- Maximum SLS bending moment (DL only)
- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL only; OK

20 MPa
289 MPa
280 MPa
320 MPa
320 MPa

AS 5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

Check Shear Capacity


Design ULS Shear Force V*
39.40 kN/m

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.2

28

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 29
Revision No: 0

Strength excluding shear reinforcement, Vuc


1 = 1.1 * (1.6 - d0/1000) 1.1
2
3
bv
do
Ast
fc
Vuc = 1 * 2 * 3 * bv * d0 * ((Ast * f'c)/(bv * d0))(1/3)

1.1
1.0
1.0
1000 mm
137 mm
2011 mm2
50 MPa
135.9 kN/m

Shear strength of beam with minimum reinforcement


Vu.min = Vuc + 0.6 * bv * d0
= 0.7
Vu.min = 0.7 * 218.1

218.1 kN/m
152.7 kN/m

Vu > V*; OK

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.2.5 (a)
AS 3600
Cl 8.2.5 (i)

No shear reinforcement required

29

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 30
Revision No: 0

719.1 kNm/m
SLS reinforcement stresses
Case 1: SLS Design bending moment (DL +LL)
SLS design bending moment (DL + LL)
This was used in combination with the following parameters:
- DNA
-
- E concrete
- E steel

178.30 mm
0.0003154
34800 MPa
200000 MPa
978.5 kN/m

-1405 kN/m

Concrete Force = Ec * DNA/2 *


Reinforcement Force

1269 kNm/m

Total Reinforcement Force


Reo force > Concrete force; OK

240 MPa

30

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Total Reinforcement Moment about concrete centroid

Page No: 31
Revision No: 0

185 MPa
320 MPa
320 MPa

Resultant moment > Applied moment; OK


- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL + LL; OK
Case 2: SLS Design bending moment (DL only)
- Maximum SLS bending moment (DL only)
- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL only; OK

AS 5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

12 kNm/m
3 MPa
185 MPa
320 MPa
320 MPa

AS 5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

400.8 kN/m

Check Shear Capacity


Design ULS Shear Force V*

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.2

31

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Calculations

Page No: 32
Revision No: 0

Results

Reference

fc
fcf = 0.6 * fc0.5
D
B
Z = BD2/6
(Muo)min = 1.2 * Z * fcf

50 MPa
4.243 MPa
200 mm
1000 mm
6.667x106 mm3
33.9 kNm

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.1.4

ULS bending moments retrieved from Strand 7 output


- At support (positive)
- At mid-span (negative)

30.8 kNm/m
-24.1 kNm/m

Top Slab Longitudinal Reinforcement Design


Minimum Strength Requirement

Therefore (Muo)min governs and so design based on this case


Reo Design
Design for a metre width
M* = (Muo)min
Trial 16 mm diameter bars at 100mm spacing
Ast = r2 * 1/0.10
DNA
Rectangular stress block depth factor
= [0.85 0.007 * (fc 28)| 0.65 0.85]
Stress block depth
Ultimate stress = 0.85 * fc
Concrete force
Reinforcement force

33.94 kNm/m

2011 mm2/m
45.78 mm
0.696

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.1.2.2

31.9 mm
42.5 MPa
1354 kN/m
-1354 kN/m

Satisfies F = 0; OK
Total Reinforcement moment about concrete centroid
= 0.8
Mu = 0.8 * 141

141 kN/m
112.6 kN/m

Therefore Mu > M* is satisfied; OK

32

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Calculations

Page No: 33
Revision No: 0

Results

References

Top Slab Transverse Reinforcement Design


-

All Design moments for transverse reinforcement design have


been computed through the addition of global moments
(found by strand 7) and local moments (Macaulays method as -40.6 kNm/m
shown below)
2011 mm2/m

Minimum Strength Requirement


fc
fcf = 0.6 * fc0.5
D
B
Z = BD2/6
Assumed cover
Stirrups
(Muo)min = 1.2 * Z * fcf
ULS bending moments retrieved from Strand 7 output
- At support (positive)
- At mid-span (negative)

41.44 mm
0.696

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.1.2.2

28.8 mm
42.5 MPa
1226 kN/m
-1225 kN/m

145 kN/m
115.9 kN/m

Therefore (Muo)min does not govern and so design for positive and
negative reo separately.
Positive Reo Design
Design for a metre width
M* = (Muo)min
Trial 16 mm diameter bars at 80 mm spacing
Ast = r2 * 1/0.08
DNA
Rectangular stress block depth factor
= [0.85 0.007 * (fc 28)| 0.65 0.85]
Stress block depth
Ultimate stress = 0.85 * fc
Concrete force
Reinforcement force

14.8kNm/m

48.689 mm
0.000425
34800 MPa
200000 MPa
360 kN/m

-360 kN/m

33

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 34
Revision No: 0

Satisfies F = 0; OK
Total Reinforcement moment about concrete centroid
= 0.8

48 kNm/m

- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress


- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL + LL;
OK

179 MPa
280 MPa
320 MPa
320 MPa

AS 5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

Case 2: SLS Design bending moment (DL only)


- Maximum SLS bending moment (DL only)
- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL only;
OK

20 MPa
244 MPa
280 MPa
320 MPa
320 MPa

Check Shear Capacity


Design ULS Shear Force V*
Strength excluding shear reinforcement, Vuc
1 = 1.1 * (1.6 - d0/1000) 1.1
2
3
bv
do
Ast
fc
Vuc = 1 * 2 * 3 * bv * d0 * ((Ast * f'c)/(bv * d0))(1/3)

191.2 kN/m

AS 5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.2

1.1
1.0
1.0
1000 mm
137 mm
2011 mm2
50 MPa
135.9 kN/m

Shear strength of beam with minimum reinforcement


218.1 kN/m
Vu.min = Vuc + 0.6 * bv * d0
= 0.7
Vu.min = 0.7 * 274.1

152.7 kN/m
AS 5100.5
Cl 8.2.5 (a)

Vu > V*; OK
Minimum Shear Reinforcement
500 mm

34

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 35
Revision No: 0

Asv.min = (0.35 * bv.s)/fsy.f


350 mm2/m
16 mm
2 per metre
width

Shear reinforcement spacing


Provide 2 leg 16mm diameter/m width
Minimum area required
Diameter
Number of legs

402.1 mm2/m

Area
Area > minimum area; OK
AS 5100.5
Cl 9.3.3

Macaulays Method

Beam Segments
X End (m)
3

EI (kn/mm^2)
23333

Supports
X(m)
0
0.92
1.94
2.86
Point Loads
A160 Loading: Maximum Positive Moment Position
Position(m)

Force (kn/m)*

0.46
2.46

-172.899
-172.899

Distributed Load
(kn/m)
-9.2
-9.2

W80 Loading Maximum Negative Moment Position


Position(m)

Force (kn/m)*

0.53

-172.899

Distributed Load
(kn/m)
-9.2

AS 5100.2
Cl 6.11

*Values have been multiplied by 1.8 (ULS factor) and 1.4 (Dynamic LA)
Maximum and Minimum Moments and Shear Force

35

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Loading Case
A160
W80

Moments
34.608
-16.442

Page No: 36
Revision No: 0

Shear Force**
98.592

**Value has been divided by 1.8 to remove ULS Factoring

36

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Calculations

Page No: 37
Revision No: 0

Results

References

Top Slab Transverse Reinforcement Design


-

All Design moments for transverse reinforcement design have


been computed through the addition of global moments
(found by strand 7) and local moments (Macaulays method as
shown below)

Minimum Strength Requirement


fc
fcf = 0.6 * fc0.5
D
B
Z = BD2/6
Assumed cover
Stirrups
(Muo)min = 1.2 * Z * fcf
ULS bending moments retrieved from Strand 7 output
- At support (positive)
- At mid-span (negative)

50 MPa
4.243 MPa
200 mm
1000 mm
6.667x106 mm3
35 mm
16 mm
33.9 kNm

AS5100.5
Cl 8.1.4

65.4 kNm/m
-40.6 kNm/m

Therefore (Muo)min does not govern and so design for positive and
negative reo separately.
Positive Reo Design
Design for a metre width
M* = (Muo)min
65.4 kNm/m
Trial 16 mm diameter bars at 80 mm spacing
Ast = r2 * 1/0.08
2513 mm2/m
DNA
Rectangular stress block depth factor
= [0.85 0.007 * (fc 28)| 0.65 0.85]
Stress block depth
Ultimate stress = 0.85 * fc
Concrete force
Reinforcement force

50.779 mm
0.696

AS5100.5
Cl 8.1.2.2

35.3 mm
42.5 MPa
1502 kN/m
-1502 kN/m

37

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 38
Revision No: 0

Satisfies F = 0; OK
Total Reinforcement moment about concrete centroid
= 0.8

165 kN/m

Mu = 0.8 * 288

130.1 kN/m

Therefore Mu > M* is satisfied; OK


SLS reinforcement stresses
Case 1: SLS Design bending moment (DL +LL)
SLS design bending moment (DL + LL)
This was used in combination with the following parameters:
- DNA
-
- E concrete
- E steel
Concrete Force = Ec * DNA/2 *

19.7kNm/m

52.218 mm
0.0003190
34800 MPa
200000 MPa
290 kN/m

Reinforcement Force
Total Reinforcement Force

-290 kN/m

Satisfies F ~ 0; OK
Total Reinforcement Moment about concrete centroid

34 kNm/m

Resultant moment > Applied moment; OK


- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL + LL;
OK

108 MPa
280 MPa
320 MPa
320 MPa

AS5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

20 MPa
111 MPa
280 MPa
320 MPa

AS5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

Case 2: SLS Design bending moment (DL only)


-

Maximum SLS bending moment (DL only)


Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
Maximum allowable stress
Maximum allowable stress
Governing allowable stress

38

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL only;
OK

Page No: 39
Revision No: 0

320 MPa

Check Shear Capacity


Design ULS Shear Force V*
191.2 kN/m

AS5100.5
Cl 8.2

39

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 40
Revision No: 0

Strength excluding shear reinforcement, Vuc


1 = 1.1 * (1.6 - d0/1000) 1.1
2
3
bv
do
Ast
fc
Vuc = 1 * 2 * 3 * bv * d0 * ((Ast * f'c)/(bv * d0))(1/3)

1.1
1.0
1.0
1000 mm
141 mm
2513 mm2
50 MPa
149.3 kN/m

Shear strength of beam with minimum reinforcement


Vu.min = Vuc + 0.6 * bv * d0
= 0.7
Vu.min = 0.7 * 274.1

233.9kN/m
163.7 kN/m

Vu > V*; OK
Minimum Shear Reinforcement
Asv.min = (0.35 * bv.s)/fsy.f
500 mm
Shear reinforcement spacing
Provide 2 leg 16mm diameter/m width
Minimum area required
Diameter
Number of legs
Area
Area > minimum area; OK

350 mm2/m
16 mm
2 per metre
width
402.1 mm2/m

Crack Control of Slab


a) Ast.min 3ks * Act/fs
Ks = 0.6
Act = 1000 * (200 DNA)
= 124 709 mm2
fs = 210 MPa
Ast.min 1068.93 mm2
OK
b) Centre to centre spacing of bars = 80mm < min (2.0 * Ds,
300mm), OK
c) Load effects considered for serviceability limit state loads

AS5100.5
Cl 9.4.1

Ast.min 1068.93
mm2

40

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 41
Revision No: 0

e) fscr < 210 MPa


f) fscr < 0.8 * fsy

41

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Calculations

Page No: 42
Revision No: 0

Results

Reference

Revised Footing
Minimum Strength Requirement
fc
fcf = 0.6 * fc0.5
D
B
Z = BD2/6
Assumed cover
Stirrups
(Muo)min = 1.2 * Z * fcf

50 MPa
4.243 MPa
900 mm
2800 mm
3.78x108 mm3
70 mm
16 mm
1924.5 kNm

ULS bending moments retrieved from Strand 7 output


- At support (positive)
- At mid-span (negative)

971.6 kNm/m
-847.2 kNm/m

AS5100.5
Cl 8.1.4

(Muo)min governs
Design for a metre width
M* = (Muo)min/2.8

687.31 kNm/m

Trial 20 mm diameter bars at 150mm spacing


Ast = r2 * 1/0.08

2094 mm2/m

DNA
Rectangular stress block depth factor
= [0.85 0.007 * (fc 28)| 0.65 0.85]

Ultimate stress = 0.85 * fc


Stress block depth
Concrete force
Reinforcement force

60.31 mm
0.696

42.5 MPa
41.8 mm
1776.5 kN/m
-1776.5 kN/m

AS5100.5
Cl 8.1.2.2

Satisfies F = 0; OK
Total Reinforcement moment about concrete centroid
= 0.8
Mu = 0.8 * 2689.4

2689.4 kN/m
2151.52 kN/m

Therefore Mu > M* is satisfied; OK

42

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 43
Revision No: 0

SLS reinforcement stresses


Case 1: SLS Design bending moment (DL +LL)
SLS design bending moment (DL + LL) = -510.7/3

719.1kNm/m

This was used in combination with the following parameters:


- DNA
-
- E concrete
- E steel

140.30 mm
0.00021
34800 MPa
200000 MPa

Concrete Force = Ec * DNA/2 *

513.2 kN/m

Reinforcement Force
Total Reinforcement Force

-513 kN/m

Reo force > Concrete force; OK


Total Reinforcement Moment about concrete centroid

250 kNm/m

Resultant moment > Applied moment; OK


- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL +
LL; OK

184 MPa
240 MPa
280 MPa
280 MPa

AS5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

88 kNm/m
76 MPa
240 MPa
280 MPa
280 MPa

AS5100.5
T 8.6.1 (A)
T 8.6.1 (B)

Case 2: SLS Design bending moment (DL only)


- Maximum SLS bending moment (DL/2.8m)
- Maximum reinforcement tensile stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Maximum allowable stress
- Governing allowable stress
Satisfies Maximum allowable stress > Maximum stress under DL
only; OK

43

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Calculation

Page No: 44
Revision No: 0

Result

Minimum steel cross-sectional area

Reference
AS 5100.5
Cl 10.7.1

Ast 0.01 * Ag
Where Ast is the area of steel
Ag is the gross area of concrete
Ag = 0.25 * * d2
= 636172.5 mm2
Where d = 900 mm, the diamter of the column
Ast = 0.01 * 636172.5 mm2
Therefore, the minimum area of steel required must be 6361.73
mm2
Try 16N24 steel bars
Ast = 16 * * 122
= 7238.23 mm2 < 0.04Ag

16N24 bars

Spacing of ties and helices


Dc = 900 mm
15 * db = 15 * 24 = 360 mm

AS 5100.5
Cl 10.7.3.3
> 300 mm
> 300 mm

Therefore the spacing between the helices is 300 mm

Stress development length


AS 5100.5
Cl 13.1.3

Lsy.c = 20 * db
= 20 * 24 = 480 mm

AS 5100.5
Cl 13.2.5 (c)

Minimum lap length for spliced bars


For Fsy > 400 MPa
(0.125 * fsy 22) * db = (0.125 * 500 22) * 24
= 972 mm

Min lap length


= 972 mm
980 mm

Atr/s nAb/3400
Atr/s = (( * 122)/4)/300 = 0.377
nAb/3400 = (16 * ( * 242)/4)/3400 = 2.129

44

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 45
Revision No: 0

Check Shear Capacity


Design ULS Shear Force V*/2.8m

36.86 kN/m

Strength excluding shear reinforcement, Vuc


1 = 1.1 * (1.6 - d0/1000) 1.1
2
3
bv
do
Ast
fc
Vuc = 1 * 2 * 3 * bv * d0 * ((Ast * f'c)/(bv * d0))(1/3)

1.1
1.0
1.0
1000 mm
804 mm
2094 mm2
50 MPa
448.3 kN/m

AS5100.5
Cl 8.2

Shear strength of beam with minimum reinforcement


Vu.min = Vuc + 0.6 * bv * d0
= 0.7
Vu.min = 0.7 * 274.1

930.7 kN/m
651.5 kN/m

Vu > V*; OK
Minimum Shear Reinforcement
Asv.min = (0.35 * bv.s)/fsy.f
500
Shear reinforcement spacing
Provide 2 leg 16mm diameter/m width
Minimum area required
Diameter
Number of legs
Area
Area > minimum area; OK

350 mm2/m
16 mm
2 per metre
width
402.1 mm2/m

AS 5100.5
Cl 8.2.5 (a)

45

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 46
Revision No: 0

46

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 47
Revision No: 0

4.0

DESIGN OUTPUTS

4.1

General
A summary of the design outputs for the bridge is included with this report in Attachment C

4.2

Finite Element Analysis Results


Results of the finite element analysis are summarised in the Attachments. Bending
moments, shear forces, axial loads, and deflections are plotted for the loads and
combinations described in Sections 2.2 and 2.3.

4.3

Cross Section and Reinforcement Design


The cross section and reinforcement design is included in section 3.0 Calculations.

4.4

Design Output Index


Footings
For longitudinal reinforcement in the footing (per three metre width), for the compressive
face of the footing 22 N24 bars at 135 mm spacing were used and in the tensile face we use
22 N20 bars, also at 135 mm spacing.
For transverse reinforcement, N20 bars were used in the top face and N24 bars were used in
the bottom face. 260 mm spacing was used for the length of the footing.
For shear reinforcement, only the minimum shear reinforcement was required which was 2
legs at 16 mm diameter per metre width.
Output can be seen in Attachment C, Submission 1 - FOOTING FRONT VIEW, SIDE VIEW
FOOTING SECTION AB, FOOTING SIDE VIEW SECTION BC, CD & DE, FOOTING SIDE VIEW
SECTION EF.
Columns
The columns will be reinforced with 16N24 500N bars, arranged as shown in Figure 5.3.2 and
5.3.3 in Attachment C. The bars will be tied together by 12mm bars in a helical matrix, with a
spacing of 300mm and, in the construction, will satisfy Clause 10.7.3.3. The results of the
finite element analysis can be found in Section 4.2 of this report.

47

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 48
Revision No: 0

Headstock
For the longitudinal reinforcement, 17 N24 bars were used at 115 mm spacing. For the shear
reinforcement, it was 2 N16 stirrups per metre width.
Output can be seen in Attachment C: HEADING FRONT VIEW, HEADSTOCK SIDE VIEW
SECTION AB, HEADSTOCK SIDE VIEW SECTION BC, CD & DE, FOOTING SIDE VIEW
SECTION EF.

48

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 49
Revision No: 0

Attachment A - Substructure Frame Model


ULS Max Support: Shear Force 2

Bending Moment 2

49

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 50
Revision No: 0

Axial Force

50

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 51
Revision No: 0

ULS Minimum Support: Shear Force 2

51

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 52
Revision No: 0

Bending Moment 2

52

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 53
Revision No: 0

Axial Force

53

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 54
Revision No: 0

Serviceability: Shear Force 2

54

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 55
Revision No: 0

Bending Moment 2

55

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 56
Revision No: 0

Axial Force

56

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 57
Revision No: 0

SLS: Bending Moment 2

57

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 58
Revision No: 0

Bending Moment 1

Shear Force 2

58

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 59
Revision No: 0

Shear Force 1

59

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 60
Revision No: 0

Axial Force

60

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 61
Revision No: 0

Torque

61

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 62
Revision No: 0

ULS: Bending Moment 2

62

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 63
Revision No: 0

Shear Force 2

63

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 64
Revision No: 0

Torque

64

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 65
Revision No: 0

Axial Force

65

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 66
Revision No: 0

Shear Force 1

66

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 67
Revision No: 0

Bending Moment 1

67

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 68
Revision No: 0

68

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 69
Revision No: 0

69

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 70
Revision No: 0

70

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 71
Revision No: 0

71

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 72
Revision No: 0

HEADSTOCKS (SLS)

72

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 73
Revision No: 0

ULS: Headstock
3000 Bending Moment Diagram
2000

Bending Moment, kNm

1000
0

-40

-30

-20

-10

10

20

30

40

-1000
-2000
-3000
ULS Max Support

-4000

ULS: Headstock
Shear Force Diagram
5000
4000
3000

Sher Force, kN

2000
1000
0
-40

-30

-20

-10

-1000

10

20

30

40

-2000
-3000
-4000
-5000

ULS Max Support

73

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 74
Revision No: 0

Location of Maximum design actions:


Equivalent square section side length
798 mm2
Effective depth at support, assume 70 cover, 20 mm trasverse bars, 24 dia longitudinal bars
Effective depth = 1700 - 70 - 20 -24/2 =
1598 mm
Critical section distance from column CL:
Bending at support: 0.15D from face =
279 mm from centre
Shear at support: d from face
1997 mm from centre
Design actions, M* and V* (axial force is small and is neglected for design purposes)
X
ULS
SLS DL + LL
Positive Bending moment (mid-span)
-1662.9
Negative bending moment
Distance from column CL
0.00
-2143.5
1.40
-1662.9
Design section
0.279
-2047.7

SLS DL only
444.9 kNm
-395.8 kNm
54.1 kNm
-306.1 kNm

74

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

SLS; DL + LL

Beam No
Beam 8: 0.0 m
Beam 8: 0.2 m
Beam 8: 0.5 m
Beam 8: 0.7 m
Beam 8: 0.9 m
Beam 8: 1.2 m
Beam 9: 0.0 m
Beam 9: 0.0 m
Beam 9: 0.1 m
Beam 9: 0.1 m
Beam 9: 0.2 m
Beam 9: 0.2 m
Beam 10: 0.0 m
Beam 10: 0.3 m
Beam 10: 0.7 m
Beam 10: 1.0 m
Beam 10: 1.4 m
Beam 10: 1.7 m
Beam 11: 0.0 m
Beam 11: 0.3 m
Beam 11: 0.7 m
Beam 11: 1.0 m
Beam 11: 1.4 m
Beam 11: 1.7 m
Beam 12: 0.0 m
Beam 12: 0.0 m
Beam 12: 0.1 m
Beam 12: 0.1 m
Beam 12: 0.2 m
Beam 12: 0.2 m
Beam 13: 0.0 m
Beam 13: 0.4 m
Beam 13: 0.8 m
Beam 13: 1.2 m
Beam 13: 1.6 m
Beam 13: 1.9 m
Beam 14: 0.0 m
Beam 14: 0.2 m
Beam 14: 0.5 m
Beam 14: 0.7 m
Beam 14: 1.0 m

X
-29.25
-29.05
-28.75
-28.55
-28.35
-28.05
-28.05
-28.05
-27.95
-27.85
-27.65
-27.45
-27.45
-27.15
-26.45
-25.45
-24.05
-22.35
-22.35
-22.05
-21.35
-20.35
-18.95
-17.25
-17.25
-17.25
-17.15
-17.05
-16.85
-16.65
-16.65
-16.25
-15.45
-14.25
-12.65
-10.75
-10.75
-10.55
-10.05
-9.35
-8.35

Shear Force
2
0
-18.6
-37.2
-55.8
-74.4
-93
-2044
-2040
-2036.1
-2032.1
-2028.1
-2024.2
844.5
817.3
790.2
763
735.9
708.7
-888.7
-916
-943.3
-970.6
-997.8
-1025.1
1773.3
1769.4
1765.6
1761.8
1757.9
1754.1
411
379.9
348.8
317.7
286.5
255.4
-938.3
-957.8
-977.3
-996.7
-1016.2

1035.3
84
-2143.5
43
Bending Axial Force
Moment 2
0
0
-2.2
0.6
-8.7
1.1
-19.5
1.7
-34.6
2.2
-54.1
2.8
558.7
143.9
457.4
143.8
356.3
143.7
255.3
143.6
154.6
143.5
54.1
143.4
-871.3
-8.5
-589.3
-7.7
-316.6
-6.9
-53.1
-6.1
201.2
-5.3
446.3
-4.5
446.3
115.1
138.7
115.9
-178.3
116.7
-504.5
117.5
-840.1
118.4
-1185
119.2
-1533.7
-40.4
-1448.6
-40.3
-1363.8
-40.2
-1279.1
-40.1
-1194.6
-40
-1110.2
-39.8
-1110.2
62.4
-956.4
63.3
-814.7
64.2
-685.1
65.2
-567.6
66.1
-462.2
67
-462.2
159.4
-692.8
160
-928.3
160.6
-1168.4
161.2
-1413.3
161.8

Page No: 75
Revision No: 0

SLS; DL only

Beam No
Beam 8: 0.0 m
Beam 8: 0.2 m
Beam 8: 0.5 m
Beam 8: 0.7 m
Beam 8: 0.9 m
Beam 8: 1.2 m
Beam 9: 0.0 m
Beam 9: 0.0 m
Beam 9: 0.1 m
Beam 9: 0.1 m
Beam 9: 0.2 m
Beam 9: 0.2 m
Beam 10: 0.0 m
Beam 10: 0.3 m
Beam 10: 0.7 m
Beam 10: 1.0 m
Beam 10: 1.4 m
Beam 10: 1.7 m
Beam 11: 0.0 m
Beam 11: 0.3 m
Beam 11: 0.7 m
Beam 11: 1.0 m
Beam 11: 1.4 m
Beam 11: 1.7 m
Beam 12: 0.0 m
Beam 12: 0.0 m
Beam 12: 0.1 m
Beam 12: 0.1 m
Beam 12: 0.2 m
Beam 12: 0.2 m
Beam 13: 0.0 m
Beam 13: 0.4 m
Beam 13: 0.8 m
Beam 13: 1.2 m
Beam 13: 1.6 m
Beam 13: 1.9 m
Beam 14: 0.0 m
Beam 14: 0.2 m
Beam 14: 0.5 m
Beam 14: 0.7 m
Beam 14: 1.0 m

X
-29.25
-29.05
-28.75
-28.55
-28.35
-28.05
-28.05
-28.05
-27.95
-27.85
-27.65
-27.45
-27.45
-27.15
-26.45
-25.45
-24.05
-22.35
-22.35
-22.05
-21.35
-20.35
-18.95
-17.25
-17.25
-17.25
-17.15
-17.05
-16.85
-16.65
-16.65
-16.25
-15.45
-14.25
-12.65
-10.75
-10.75
-10.55
-10.05
-9.35
-8.35

Shear Force
2
0
-18.6
-37.2
-55.8
-74.4
-93
-1022.5
-1018.5
-1014.6
-1010.6
-1006.6
-1002.7
657.3
630.1
603
575.8
548.7
521.5
-388.1
-415.4
-442.7
-470
-497.2
-524.5
1288.3
1284.4
1280.6
1276.7
1272.9
1269.1
359.4
328.3
297.2
266.1
234.9
203.8
-705.8
-725.3
-744.7
-764.2
-783.7

627.5
67
-395.8
13
Bending Axial Force
Moment 2
0
0
-2.2
0.5
-8.7
1.1
-19.5
1.6
-34.6
2.2
-54.1
2.7
305.3
28.8
254.6
28.7
204.2
28.6
154
28.5
103.9
28.3
54.1
28.2
-395.8
-39
-177.4
-38.2
31.9
-37.4
231.9
-36.6
422.7
-35.9
604.2
-35.1
604.2
-8.7
467.3
-7.9
321
-7.1
165.4
-6.3
0.5
-5.5
-173.7
-4.7
-232.8
-70.4
-171
-70.3
-109.5
-70.1
-48.1
-70
13.2
-69.9
74.2
-69.8
74.2
-43.4
208
-42.5
329.6
-41.6
439.2
-40.6
536.6
-39.7
621.9
-38.8
621.9
-12
447.8
-11.4
269
-10.8
85.4
-10.3
-102.9
-9.7

75

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
Beam 14:
Beam 15:
Beam 15:
Beam 15:
Beam 15:
Beam 15:
Beam 15:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:

1.2 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.3 m
0.4 m
0.6 m
0.7 m
0.0 m
0.4 m
0.8 m
1.2 m
1.5 m
1.6 m
1.9 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.3 m
0.4 m
0.6 m
0.7 m
0.0 m
0.2 m
0.5 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.2 m
0.0 m
0.4 m
0.8 m
1.2 m
1.6 m
1.9 m
0.0 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.1 m
0.2 m
0.2 m
0.0 m
0.3 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.4 m
1.7 m
0.0 m
0.3 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.4 m
1.7 m
0.0 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.1 m
0.2 m
0.2 m
0.0 m
0.2 m
0.5 m
0.7 m
0.9 m
1.2 m

-7.15
-7.15
-7.05
-6.75
-6.35
-5.75
-5.05
-5.05
-4.65
-3.85
-2.65
-1.05
0.85
2.75
2.75
2.85
3.15
3.55
4.15
4.85
4.85
5.05
5.55
6.25
7.25
8.45
8.45
8.85
9.65
10.85
12.45
14.35
14.35
14.35
14.45
14.55
14.75
14.95
14.95
15.25
15.95
16.95
18.35
20.05
20.05
20.35
21.05
22.05
23.45
25.15
25.15
25.15
25.25
25.35
25.55
25.75
25.75
25.95
26.45
27.15
28.05
29.25

-1035.7
1573.8
1562.2
1550.5
1538.9
1527.2
1515.5
377.6
346.4
315.3
284.2
253.1
221.9
-929.1
-940.8
-952.4
-964.1
-975.7
-987.4
1493.8
1474.3
1454.8
1435.4
1415.9
1396.4
184.7
153.6
122.4
91.3
60.2
29.1
-1274.7
-1278.6
-1282.4
-1286.3
-1290.1
-1293.9
1098.9
1071.7
1044.4
1017.1
989.8
962.5
-493.5
-520.6
-547.8
-574.9
-602.1
-629.2
1781
1777
1773.1
1769.1
1765.1
1761.1
93
74.4
55.8
37.2
18.6
9
0

-1662.9
-2143.5
-1915.2
-1688.5
-1463.5
-1240.2
-1018.6
-1018.6
-877.7
-749
-632.5
-528
-435.6
-435.6
-571.8
-709.6
-849.2
-990.5
-1133.5
-1736.2
-1375.1
-1018.8
-667.2
-320.4
21.8
21.8
87.5
141.2
182.8
212.3
229.6
229.6
168.3
106.8
45.1
-16.7
-78.8
-721.8
-351.8
8.9
360.4
702.5
1035.3
1035.3
863.2
682
491.5
291.8
82.9
-493.5
-405.2
-317.1
-229.3
-141.6
-54.1
-54.1
-34.6
-19.5
-8.7
-2.2
-1.1
0

162.4
-19.6
-19.3
-18.9
-18.6
-18.2
-17.9
69.7
70.6
71.5
72.5
73.4
74.3
163
163.3
163.6
164
164.3
164.7
-37.9
-37.3
-36.8
-36.2
-35.6
-35.1
68.1
67.2
66.3
65.4
64.5
63.6
86.6
86.5
86.4
86.3
86.2
86.1
15.4
14.6
13.9
13.1
12.3
11.5
36
35.2
34.5
33.7
32.9
32.1
-17.9
-18
-18.2
-18.3
-18.4
-18.5
2.7
2.1
1.6
1.1
0.5
0.2
0

Page No: 76
Revision No: 0

Beam 14:
Beam 15:
Beam 15:
Beam 15:
Beam 15:
Beam 15:
Beam 15:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 16:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:

1.2 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.3 m
0.4 m
0.6 m
0.7 m
0.0 m
0.4 m
0.8 m
1.2 m
1.5 m
1.6 m
1.9 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.3 m
0.4 m
0.6 m
0.7 m
0.0 m
0.2 m
0.5 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.2 m
0.0 m
0.4 m
0.8 m
1.2 m
1.6 m
1.9 m
0.0 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.1 m
0.2 m
0.2 m
0.0 m
0.3 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.4 m
1.7 m
0.0 m
0.3 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.4 m
1.7 m
0.0 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.1 m
0.2 m
0.2 m
0.0 m
0.2 m
0.5 m
0.7 m
0.9 m
1.2 m

-7.15
-7.15
-7.05
-6.75
-6.35
-5.75
-5.05
-5.05
-4.65
-3.85
-2.65
-1.05
0.85
2.75
2.75
2.85
3.15
3.55
4.15
4.85
4.85
5.05
5.55
6.25
7.25
8.45
8.45
8.85
9.65
10.85
12.45
14.35
14.35
14.35
14.45
14.55
14.75
14.95
14.95
15.25
15.95
16.95
18.35
20.05
20.05
20.35
21.05
22.05
23.45
25.15
25.15
25.15
25.25
25.35
25.55
25.75
25.75
25.95
26.45
27.15
28.05
29.25

-803.1
1047.3
1035.6
1024
1012.3
1000.6
989
79.3
48.2
17.1
0
-14
-45.1
-76.3
-985.9
-997.5
-1009.2
-1020.8
-1032.5
-1044.1
801.4
781.9
762.5
743
723.5
704.1
-203.7
-234.8
-265.9
-297.1
-328.2
-359.3
-1268.9
-1272.8
-1276.6
-1280.5
-1284.3
-1288.1
522.8
495.5
468.2
440.9
413.7
386.4
-523.3
-550.4
-577.6
-604.7
-631.9
-659
1022.4
1018.4
1014.4
1010.5
1006.5
1002.5
93
74.4
55.8
37.2
18.6
0

-295.9
-315.7
-164
-14
134.3
280.9
425.8
425.8
450.6
463.4
465.2
464
452.4
428.8
428.8
284.4
138.2
-9.6
-159.2
-310.4
-288.2
-95.6
92.3
275.5
453.9
627.5
627.5
542.2
444.9
335.4
213.8
80.1
80.1
19
-42.2
-103.6
-165.2
-226.9
-167.3
6.3
170.6
325.6
471.2
607.6
607.6
425.5
234.1
33.5
-176.3
-395.4
-305.3
-254.6
-204.2
-154
-103.9
-54.1
-54.1
-34.6
-19.5
-8.7
-2.2
0

76

-9.1
-67.3
-67
-66.6
-66.3
-66
-65.6
-39.4
-38.5
-37.6
-37.1
-36.7
-35.8
-34.9
-8.7
-8.3
-8
-7.6
-7.3
-7
-55.3
-54.8
-54.2
-53.7
-53.1
-52.5
-38.2
-39.1
-40
-41
-41.9
-42.8
-69.2
-69.3
-69.4
-69.5
-69.7
-69.8
-4.3
-5.1
-5.9
-6.7
-7.5
-8.3
-34.7
-35.4
-36.2
-37
-37.8
-38.6
32.9
32.8
32.7
32.5
32.4
32.3
2.7
2.2
1.6
1.1
0.5
0

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 77
Revision No: 0

HEADSTOCK (ULS)

ULS: Headstock
3000 Bending Moment Diagram
2000

Bending Moment, kNm

1000
0

-40

-30

-20

-10

10

20

30

40

-1000
-2000
-3000
ULS Max Support

-4000

ULS: Headstock
Shear Force Diagram
5000
4000
3000

Sher Force, kN

2000
1000
0
-40

-30

-20

-10

-1000

10

20

30

40

-2000
-3000
-4000
-5000

ULS Max Support

77

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 78
Revision No: 0

Location of Maximum design actions:


Equivalent square section side length
798 mm2
Effective depth at support, assume 70 cover, 20 mm trasverse bars, 24 dia longitudinal bars
Effective depth = 1700 - 70 - 20 -24/2 =
1598 mm
Critical section distance from column CL:
Bending at support: 0.15D from face =
279 mm from centre
Shear at support: d from face
1997 mm from centre
Design actions, M* and V* (axial force is small and is neglected for design purposes)
X
ULS
Positive Bending moment (mid-span)
2372.3
Negative bending moment
Distance from column CL
0.00
-2949.4
1.60
-2501.6
Design section
0.279
-2871.3
Shear Force
Design section
1.997
-1437.2

kNm
kNm
kNm
kNm
kN

78

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
4229.1
2372.3
25
18
ULS; maximum support stiffness
-4000.7
-2057.8
7
60
Shear Force Bending
Beam No
X
2
Moment 2
Beam 8: 0.0 m
-29.25
0
0
Beam 8: 0.2 m
-29.05
-22.3
-2.6
Beam 8: 0.5 m
-28.75
-44.6
-10.4
Beam 8: 0.7 m
-28.55
-67
-23.4
Beam 8: 0.9 m
-28.35
-89.3
-41.5
Beam 8: 1.2 m
-28.05
-111.6
-64.9
Beam 9: 0.0 m
-28.05
-4000.7
1054.5
Beam 9: 0.0 m
-28.05
-3995.9
856.1
Beam 9: 0.1 m
-27.95
-3991.2
657.9
Beam 9: 0.1 m
-27.85
-3986.4
460
Beam 9: 0.2 m
-27.65
-3981.6
262.3
Beam 9: 0.2 m
-27.45
-3976.9
64.9
Beam 10: 0.0 m
-27.45
2165.4
-1163.5
Beam 10: 0.3 m
-27.15
2132.8
-434.3
Beam 10: 0.7 m
-26.45
2100.2
284
Beam 10: 1.0 m
-25.45
2067.7
991.1
Beam 10: 1.4 m
-24.05
2035.1
1687.3
Beam 10: 1.7 m
-22.35
2002.5
2372.3
Beam 11: 0.0 m
-22.35
-1694.3
2372.3
Beam 11: 0.3 m
-22.05
-1727.1
1789.1
Beam 11: 0.7 m
-21.35
-1759.8
1194.6
Beam 11: 1.0 m
-20.35
-1792.6
589
Beam 11: 1.4 m
-18.95
-1825.3
-27.7
Beam 11: 1.7 m
-17.25
-1858
-655.6
Beam 12: 0.0 m
-17.25
4229.1
-643.3
Beam 12: 0.0 m
-17.25
4224.5
-440.4
Beam 12: 0.1 m
-17.15
4219.9
-237.6
Beam 12: 0.1 m
-17.05
4215.2
-35.1
Beam 12: 0.2 m
-16.85
4210.6
167.2
Beam 12: 0.2 m
-16.65
4206
369.3
Beam 13: 0.0 m
-16.65
739.1
369.3
Beam 13: 0.4 m
-16.25
701.8
649.5
Beam 13: 0.8 m
-15.45
664.4
915.2
Beam 13: 1.2 m
-14.25
627.1
1166.4
Beam 13: 1.6 m
-12.65
589.7
1403
Beam 13: 1.9 m
-10.75
552.4
1625.2
Beam 14: 0.0 m
-10.75
-2634.2
1625.2
Beam 14: 0.2 m
-10.55
-2657.6
981.4
Beam 14: 0.5 m
-10.05
-2681
331.9
Beam 14: 0.7 m
-9.35
-2704.3
-323.2
Beam 14: 1.0 m
-8.35
-2727.7
-984
Beam 14: 1.2 m
-7.15
-2751
-1650.5
Beam 15: 0.0 m
-7.15
2803.1
-1571.2
Beam 15: 0.1 m
-7.05
2789.1
-1164
Beam 15: 0.3 m
-6.75
2775.1
-758.7
Beam 15: 0.4 m
-6.35
2761.1
-355.5
Beam 15: 0.6 m
-5.75
2747.1
45.7
Beam 15: 0.7 m
-5.05
2733.2
444.8
Beam 16: 0.0 m
-5.05
-122.8
444.8
Beam 16: 0.4 m
-4.65
-160.2
389.8
Beam 16: 0.8 m
-3.85
-197.5
320.2
Beam 16: 1.2 m
-2.65
-234.9
236.1
Beam 16: 1.6 m
-1.05
-272.2
137.5
Beam 16: 1.8 m
0.85
-309.6
24.3

Page No: 79
Revision No: 0

ULS; minimum support stiffness


Axial Force
0
0.7
1.3
2
2.6
3.3
113.2
113.1
113
112.8
112.7
112.6
-87.1
-86.1
-85.2
-84.2
-83.3
-82.3
25.7
26.6
27.6
28.5
29.5
30.5
-145.4
-145.2
-145.1
-145
-144.8
-144.7
-43.1
-42
-40.9
-39.8
-38.7
-37.6
57.3
58
58.7
59.4
60.1
60.8
-86.6
-86.2
-85.8
-85.4
-85
-84.6
-1.5
-0.4
0.7
1.8
2.9
4

Beam No
Beam 8
Beam 8: 0.2 m
Beam 8: 0.5 m
Beam 8: 0.7 m
Beam 8: 0.9 m
Beam 8: 1.2 m
Beam 9: 0.0 m
Beam 9: 0.0 m
Beam 9: 0.1 m
Beam 9: 0.1 m
Beam 9: 0.2 m
Beam 9: 0.2 m
Beam 10: 0.0 m
Beam 10: 0.3 m
Beam 10: 0.7 m
Beam 10: 1.0 m
Beam 10: 1.4 m
Beam 10: 1.7 m
Beam 11: 0.0 m
Beam 11: 0.3 m
Beam 11: 0.7 m
Beam 11: 1.0 m
Beam 11: 1.4 m
Beam 11: 1.7 m
Beam 12: 0.0 m
Beam 12: 0.0 m
Beam 12: 0.1 m
Beam 12: 0.1 m
Beam 12: 0.2 m
Beam 12: 0.2 m
Beam 13: 0.0 m
Beam 13: 0.4 m
Beam 13: 0.8 m
Beam 13: 1.2 m
Beam 13: 1.6 m
Beam 13: 1.9 m
Beam 14: 0.0 m
Beam 14: 0.2 m
Beam 14: 0.5 m
Beam 14: 0.7 m
Beam 14: 1.0 m
Beam 14: 1.2 m
Beam 15: 0.0 m
Beam 15: 0.1 m
Beam 15: 0.3 m
Beam 15: 0.4 m
Beam 15: 0.6 m
Beam 15: 0.7 m
Beam 16: 0.0 m
Beam 16: 0.4 m
Beam 16: 0.8 m
Beam 16: 1.2 m
Beam 16: 1.6 m
Beam 16: 1.9 m

X
-29.25
-29.05
-28.75
-28.55
-28.35
-28.05
-28.05
-28.05
-27.95
-27.85
-27.65
-27.45
-27.45
-27.15
-26.45
-25.45
-24.05
-22.35
-22.35
-22.05
-21.35
-20.35
-18.95
-17.25
-17.25
-17.25
-17.15
-17.05
-16.85
-16.65
-16.65
-16.25
-15.45
-14.25
-12.65
-10.75
-10.75
-10.55
-10.05
-9.35
-8.35
-7.15
-7.15
-7.05
-6.75
-6.35
-5.75
-5.05
-5.05
-4.65
-3.85
-2.65
-1.05
0.85

2392.7
1233.5
91
84
-2799.9
-2949.4
7
43
Shear Force Bending Axial Force
2
Moment 2
0
0
0
-22.3
-2.6
0.7
-44.6
-10.4
1.3
-67
-23.4
2
-89.3
-41.5
2.7
-111.6
-64.9
3.4
-2799.9
756.6
166.3
-2795.1
617.8
166.1
-2790.3
479.2
166
-2785.6
340.8
165.9
-2780.8
202.7
165.7
-2776
64.9
165.6
1029.8
-965.3
9.7
997.2
-621.4
10.7
964.6
-288.6
11.7
932
33.2
12.6
899.4
344
13.6
866.8
643.6
14.6
-1284
643.6
151.1
-1316.7
200.3
152.1
-1349.5
-254.2
153.1
-1382.2
-719.9
154.1
-1414.9
-1196.8
155.1
-1447.7
-1684.8
156.1
2178.3
-1932.9
-5.5
2173.7
-1828.4
-5.4
2169.1
-1724.2
-5.3
2164.5
-1620.1
-5.1
2159.9
-1516.3
-5
2155.2
-1412.7
-4.9
395.9
-1412.7
110.1
358.6
-1265.9
111.2
321.2
-1133.7
112.3
283.9
-1016.1
113.4
246.5
-912.9
114.6
209.2
-824.3
115.7
-1320.4
-824.3
218.5
-1343.8
-1148.4
219.2
-1367.1
-1478.2
219.9
-1390.5
-1813.6
220.6
-1413.8
-2154.8
221.3
-1437.2
-2501.6
222
1932.2
-2949.4
25.1
1918.2
-2669
25.5
1904.3
-2390.6
25.9
1890.3
-2114.3
26.3
1876.3
-1839.9
26.8
1862.3
-1567.7
27.2
418.6
-1567.7
123.9
381.2
-1412.1
125
343.9
-1271.1
126.1
306.5
-1144.6
127.2
269.2
-1032.6
128.3
231.8
-935.2
129.5

79

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Beam 16:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:

1.9 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.3 m
0.4 m
0.6 m
0.7 m
0.0 m
0.2 m
0.5 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.2 m
0.0 m
0.4 m
0.8 m
1.2 m
1.6 m
1.9 m
0.0 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.1 m
0.2 m
0.2 m
0.0 m
0.3 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.4 m
1.7 m
0.0 m
0.3 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.4 m
1.7 m
0.0 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.1 m
0.2 m
0.2 m
0.0 m
0.2 m
0.5 m
0.7 m
0.9 m
1.2 m

2.75
2.75
2.85
3.15
3.55
4.15
4.85
4.85
5.05
5.55
6.25
7.25
8.45
8.45
8.85
9.65
10.85
12.45
14.35
14.35
14.35
14.45
14.55
14.75
14.95
14.95
15.25
15.95
16.95
18.35
20.05
20.05
20.35
21.05
22.05
23.45
25.15
25.15
25.15
25.25
25.35
25.55
25.75
25.75
25.95
26.45
27.15
28.05
29.25

-2823.9
-2837.9
-2851.9
-2865.9
-2879.9
-2893.8
1990.7
1967.3
1943.9
1920.6
1897.2
1873.9
-413.9
-451.2
-488.5
-525.9
-563.2
-600.6
-2848.2
-2852.9
-2857.5
-2862.1
-2866.7
-2871.3
1530.7
1498
1465.2
1432.5
1399.7
1367
-1021
-1053.6
-1086.2
-1118.7
-1151.3
-1183.9
2742.9
2738.1
2733.4
2728.6
2723.8
2719.1
111.6
89.3
67
44.6
22.3
11
0

24.3
-388
-802.4
-1218.9
-1637.3
-2057.8
-2008
-1526.5
-1050.7
-580.5
-116.1
342.6
342.6
174.4
-8.4
-205.7
-417.5
-643.8
-643.8
-780.7
-917.8
-1055.1
-1192.7
-1330.5
-1344
-827.7
-322.5
171.5
654.3
1125.9
1125.9
773.9
410.9
36.8
-348.4
-744.6
-742.5
-606.5
-470.8
-335.2
-199.9
-64.9
-64.9
-41.5
-23.4
-10.4
-2.6
-1
0

77
77.4
77.8
78.2
78.6
79
-53.1
-52.5
-51.8
-51.1
-50.4
-49.8
-7.5
-8.6
-9.7
-10.8
-11.9
-13
-78.1
-78.2
-78.3
-78.5
-78.6
-78.7
45.1
44.1
43.2
42.2
41.3
40.3
-28.9
-29.9
-30.8
-31.7
-32.7
-33.6
88
87.9
87.7
87.6
87.4
87.3
3.2
2.6
1.9
1.3
0.6
0.2
0

Beam 16:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 17:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 18:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 19:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 20:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 21:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 22:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 23:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:
Beam 24:

1.9 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.3 m
0.4 m
0.6 m
0.7 m
0.0 m
0.2 m
0.5 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.2 m
0.0 m
0.4 m
0.8 m
1.2 m
1.6 m
1.9 m
0.0 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.1 m
0.2 m
0.2 m
0.0 m
0.3 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.4 m
1.7 m
0.0 m
0.3 m
0.7 m
1.0 m
1.4 m
1.7 m
0.0 m
0.0 m
0.1 m
0.1 m
0.2 m
0.2 m
0.0 m
0.2 m
0.5 m
0.7 m
0.9 m
1.2 m

Page No: 80
Revision No: 0

2.75
2.75
2.85
3.15
3.55
4.15
4.85
4.85
5.05
5.55
6.25
7.25
8.45
8.45
8.85
9.65
10.85
12.45
14.35
14.35
14.35
14.45
14.55
14.75
14.95
14.95
15.25
15.95
16.95
18.35
20.05
20.05
20.35
21.05
22.05
23.45
25.15
25.15
25.15
25.25
25.35
25.55
25.75
25.75
25.95
26.45
27.15
28.05
29.25

-1232
-1246
-1260
-1274
-1287.9
-1301.9
1912.8
1889.4
1866.1
1842.7
1819.3
1796
238.1
200.7
163.4
126
88.7
51.3
-1645.7
-1650.3
-1654.9
-1659.5
-1664.1
-1668.8
1465.1
1432.3
1399.6
1366.9
1334.1
1301.4
-629.7
-662.3
-694.9
-727.4
-760
-792.6
2392.7
2387.9
2383.1
2378.4
2373.6
2368.8
111.6
89.3
67
44.6
22.3
11
0

-935.2
-1115.7
-1298.2
-1482.7
-1669.3
-1857.9
-2514
-2051.4
-1594.6
-1143.4
-697.9
-258.1
-258.1
-172.8
-102
-45.7
-3.9
23.3
23.3
-55.8
-135.2
-214.8
-294.6
-374.6
-1124.5
-630.6
-147.8
323.8
784.2
1233.5
1233.5
1014.3
784.1
542.7
290.4
26.9
-655.6
-537
-418.6
-300.5
-182.6
-64.9
-64.9
-41.5
-23.4
-10.4
-2.6
-1
0

227.4
227.8
228.2
228.6
229
229.4
-5.5
-4.8
-4.1
-3.4
-2.7
-2
114.4
113.3
112.2
111.1
110
109
120.7
120.6
120.5
120.3
120.2
120.1
48.2
47.3
46.3
45.4
44.4
43.5
54.3
53.4
52.5
51.5
50.6
49.7
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.8
3.2
2.6
1.9
1.3
0.6
0.2
0

80

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 81
Revision No: 0

81

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 82
Revision No: 0

82

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 83
Revision No: 0

COLUMNS
Design actions, M*, V* and N*
Since shear forces are almost constant the design section is taken at the top of the column, where axial force is minimum.
X
Bending moment at base
Bending moment at top
Maximum axial load
Shear Force
Shear at top

ULS
M*
N*
611.0
3130.3
-609.3
3262.7
532.1

5473.0

V*
144.3

N*
3238.6

SLS DL + LL
M*
N*
523.6
2389.7
-522.8
2500.1

SLS DL only
M*
N*
73.6
-1681.0 kNm
68.9
1791.7 kNm
kNm

V*

V*

N*

N*
kN

83

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 84
Revision No: 0

ULS: Column Shear Force Diagram (for max SF &BM)


0.0
0.000
-20.0

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

5.000

6.000

7.000

8.000

Sher Force, kN

-40.0
-60.0
-80.0

-100.0
-120.0
-140.0
-160.0
ULS Max Support

-180.0

ULS: Column Bending Moment Diagram (for max SF

&BM)
800.0

Bending Moment, kNm

600.0

400.0
200.0
0.0
0.000
-200.0

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

5.000

6.000

7.000

8.000

-400.0
-600.0
ULS Max Support

-800.0

84

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
ULS; maximum support stiffness
Maximum bending moment and shear
Shear
Bending
Beam No
X
Force 2 Moment 2
61 0.000
-81.8
284.1
61 1.400
-81.9
167.8
61 2.800
-81.9
51.6
61 4.300
-81.9
-64.6
61 5.700
-81.9
-180.9
61 7.100
-81.9
-297.2

Page No: 85
Revision No: 0

ULS; minimum support stiffness


Axial
Force
-3999.2
-4024.7
-4050.2
-4075.7
-4101.2
-4126.8

62
62
62
62
62
62

0.000

-83.5

295.9

-3587.6

1.400

-83.5

175.7

-3613.5

2.900

-83.5

55.5

-3639.4

4.300

-83.5

-64.7

-3665.3

5.800

-83.5

-184.9

-3691.1

7.200

-83.5

-305.1

-3717.0

63
63
63
63
63
63

0.000

-106.2

386.2

-3208.5

1.500

-106.2

231.3

-3234.7

2.900

-106.2

76.3

-3261.0

4.400

-106.2

-78.7

-3287.2

5.800

-106.2

-233.7

-3313.4

7.300

-106.2

-388.7

-3339.7

64
64
64
64
64
64

0.000

-127.0

473.2

-3105.7

1.500

-127.0

285.3

-3132.3

3.000

-127.0

97.5

-3158.9

4.400

-127.0

-90.4

-3185.4

5.900

-127.0

-278.3

-3212.0

7.400

-127.0

-466.3

-3238.6

65
65
65
65
65
65

0.000

-135.5

502.1

-3175.4

1.500

-135.5

302.4

-3201.9

2.900

-135.5

102.7

-3228.4

4.400

-135.5

-97.0

-3254.9

5.900

-135.5

-296.7

-3281.3

7.400

-135.6

-496.5

-3307.8

66
66
66
66
66
66

0.000

-120.3

446.4

-3292.0

1.500

-120.3

271.5

-3318.1

2.900

-120.3

96.6

-3344.3

4.400

-120.3

-78.3

-3370.4

5.800

-120.3

-253.3

-3396.5

7.300

-120.4

-428.3

-3422.7

Beam No
61
61
61
61
61
61

Shear Force Bending Axial Force


2
Moment 2

0.000

-48.4

168.2

-3832.5

1.400

-48.4

99.4

-3858.0

2.800

-48.5

30.6

-3883.5

4.300

-48.5

-38.2

-3909.0

5.700

-48.5

-107.1

-3934.5

7.100

-48.5

-176.0

-3960.1

62
62
62
62
62
62

0.000

-56.3

200.9

-3629.2

1.400

-56.4

119.8

-3655.0

2.900

-56.4

38.7

-3680.9

4.300

-56.4

-42.5

-3706.8

5.800

-56.4

-123.7

-3732.7

7.200

-56.5

-205.0

-3758.5

63
63
63
63
63
63

0.000

-99.9

364.0

-3373.8

1.500

-99.9

218.2

-3400.0

2.900

-100.0

72.3

-3426.3

4.400

-100.0

-73.6

-3452.5

5.800

-100.0

-219.5

-3478.7

7.300

-100.0

-365.5

-3505.0

64
64
64
64
64
64

0.000

-144.2

535.1

-3220.1

1.500

-144.2

321.8

-3246.7

3.000

-144.2

108.5

-3273.2

4.400

-144.2

-104.9

-3299.8

5.900

-144.3

-318.3

-3326.4

7.400

-144.3

-531.8

-3353.0

65
65
65
65
65
65

0.000

-165.6

611.0

-3130.3

1.500

-165.6

367.0

-3156.8

2.900

-165.6

123.0

-3183.3

4.400

-165.6

-121.1

-3209.8

5.900

-165.7

-365.2

-3236.3

7.400

-165.7

-609.3

-3262.7

66
66
66
66
66
66

0.000

-150.2

556.6

-3182.2

1.500

-150.2

338.2

-3208.4

2.900

-150.2

119.8

-3234.5

4.400

-150.3

-98.7

-3260.6

5.800

-150.3

-317.2

-3286.7

7.300

-150.3

-535.7

-3312.9

85

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 86
Revision No: 0

ULS: Column Axial Force Diagram (for max Axial Load)


0.0
0.000

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

5.000

6.000

7.000

8.000

-1000.0

Axial Force, kN

-2000.0
-3000.0
-4000.0
-5000.0
-6000.0
ULS Max Support

-7000.0
150.0

ULS: Column Bending Moment Diagram (for max Axial


Load)

Bending Moment, kNm

100.0

50.0

0.0
0.000

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

5.000

6.000

7.000

8.000

-50.0

-100.0
ULS Max Support

-150.0

86

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
ULS; maximum support stiffness
Maximum axial load
Shear
Bending
Beam No
X
Force 2 Moment 2
61 0.000
-25.3
88.0
61 1.400
-25.3
52.0
61 2.800
-25.4
16.0
61 4.300
-25.4
-20.0
61 5.700
-25.4
-56.0
61 7.100
-25.4
-92.0

Page No: 87
Revision No: 0

ULS; minimum support stiffness


Axial
Force
-6169.3
-6194.8
-6220.4
-6245.9
-6271.4
-6296.9

62
62
62
62
62
62

0.000

2.1

-10.6

-6089.6

1.400

2.1

-7.5

-6115.5

2.900

2.1

-4.5

-6141.4

4.300

2.1

-1.5

-6167.3

5.800

2.1

1.5

-6193.1

7.200

2.1

4.5

-6219.0

63
63
63
63
63
63

0.000

15.4

-66.6

-5556.0

1.500

15.4

-44.2

-5582.3

2.900

15.4

-21.7

-5608.5

4.400

15.4

0.8

-5634.7

5.800

15.4

23.3

-5661.0

7.300

15.4

45.7

-5687.2

64
64
64
64
64
64

0.000

8.9

-42.6

-4886.3

1.500

8.9

-29.4

-4912.9

3.000

8.9

-16.2

-4939.5

4.400

8.9

-3.0

-4966.1

5.900

8.9

10.1

-4992.6

7.400

8.9

23.3

-5019.2

65
65
65
65
65
65

0.000

-4.8

9.4

-4403.7

1.500

-4.8

2.3

-4430.2

2.900

-4.8

-4.8

-4456.7

4.400

-4.8

-11.8

-4483.2

5.900

-4.8

-18.9

-4509.7

7.400

-4.8

-26.0

-4536.2

66
66
66
66
66
66

0.000

-1.0

-3.0

-3928.7

1.500

-1.0

-4.5

-3954.8

2.900

-1.0

-5.9

-3980.9

4.400

-1.0

-7.4

-4007.1

5.800

-1.0

-8.9

-4033.2

7.300

-1.0

-10.4

-4059.3

Beam No
61
61
61
61
61
61

Shear Force Bending Axial Force


2
Moment 2

0.000

-33.0

112.9

-6197.5

1.400

-33.0

66.0

-6223.0

2.800

-33.1

19.1

-6248.5

4.300

-33.1

-27.9

-6274.1

5.700

-33.2

-74.9

-6299.6

7.100

-33.2

-122.0

-6325.1

62
62
62
62
62
62

0.000

-2.3

5.6

-6042.9

1.400

-2.3

2.3

-6068.7

2.900

-2.4

-1.1

-6094.6

4.300

-2.4

-4.6

-6120.5

5.800

-2.5

-8.1

-6146.4

7.200

-2.5

-11.6

-6172.2

63
63
63
63
63
63

0.000

12.6

-55.2

-5552.5

1.500

12.6

-36.7

-5578.7

2.900

12.6

-18.4

-5604.9

4.400

12.5

-0.1

-5631.2

5.800

12.5

18.2

-5657.4

7.300

12.4

36.4

-5683.6

64
64
64
64
64
64

0.000

3.3

-21.0

-4932.5

1.500

3.2

-16.2

-4959.1

3.000

3.2

-11.5

-4985.7

4.400

3.1

-6.8

-5012.3

5.900

3.1

-2.2

-5038.9

7.400

3.1

2.3

-5065.5

65
65
65
65
65
65

0.000

-14.9

45.9

-4422.3

1.500

-14.9

23.9

-4448.7

2.900

-15.0

1.9

-4475.2

4.400

-15.0

-20.2

-4501.7

5.900

-15.0

-42.3

-4528.2

7.400

-15.1

-64.5

-4554.7

66
66
66
66
66
66

0.000

-12.0

36.5

-3886.0

1.500

-12.0

19.1

-3912.2

2.900

-12.0

1.7

-3938.3

4.400

-12.1

-15.8

-3964.4

5.800

-12.1

-33.4

-3990.6

7.300

-12.1

-51.1

-4016.7

87

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 88
Revision No: 0

SLS: Column Axial Force Diagram


0.0
0.000

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

5.000

6.000

7.000

8.000

-500.0

Axial Force, kN

-1000.0

-1500.0
-2000.0
-2500.0
-3000.0
SLS: DL+LL

-3500.0

SLS: Column Bending Moment Diagram


600.0

Bending Moment, kNm

400.0

200.0
0.0
0.000

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

5.000

6.000

7.000

8.000

-200.0
-400.0
-600.0

SLS: DL+LL

88

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 89
Revision No: 0

89

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
SLS; DL + LL

Beam No
61
61
61
61
61
61

Page No: 90
Revision No: 0

SLS; DL only

Shear
Force 2

Bending
Moment 2

Axial
Force

0.000

-71.2

252.7

-2891.6

1.400

-71.2

151.7

-2912.9

2.800

-71.2

50.6

-2934.1

4.300

-71.2

-50.5

-2955.4

5.700

-71.2

-151.6

-2976.7

7.100

-71.3

-252.7

-2997.9

62
62
62
62
62
62

0.000

-78.6

282.6

-2801.9

1.400

-78.6

169.5

-2823.4

2.900

-78.6

56.3

-2845.0

4.300

-78.7

-57.0

-2866.6

5.800

-78.7

-170.2

-2888.1

7.200

-78.7

-283.5

-2909.7

63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63

0.000

-107.0

390.7

-2613.7

1.500

-107.0

234.5

-2635.6

2.900

-107.0

78.3

-2657.4

4.400

-107.1

-78.0

-2679.3

5.800

-107.1

-234.2

-2701.2

7.300

-107.1

-390.5

-2723.0

64
64
64
64
64
64
64
64
64

0.000

-132.4

491.3

-2485.9

1.500

-132.4

295.4

-2508.1

3.000

-132.5

99.5

-2530.2

4.400

-132.5

-96.5

-2552.4

5.900

-132.5

-292.5

-2574.5

7.400

-132.5

-488.5

-2596.7

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

0.000

-142.0

523.6

-2389.7

1.500

-142.0

314.4

-2411.8

2.900

-142.0

105.1

-2433.9

4.400

-142.0

-104.1

-2455.9

5.900

-142.0

-313.4

-2478.0

7.400

-142.1

-522.8

-2500.1

66
66
66
66
66
66

0.000

-126.9

469.6

-2407.5

1.500

-126.9

285.1

-2429.2

2.900

-126.9

100.6

-2451.0

4.400

-127.0

-84.0

-2472.8

5.800

-127.0

-268.6

-2494.6

7.300

-127.0

-453.2

-2516.3

Beam No
61
61
61
61
61
61

Shear Force Bending Axial Force


2
Moment 2

0.000

-20.1

73.6

-1681.0

1.400

-20.1

45.1

-1702.3

2.800

-20.1

16.6

-1723.6

4.300

-20.1

-11.9

-1744.8

5.700

-20.1

-40.4

-1766.1

7.100

-20.1

-68.9

-1787.4

62
62
62
62
62
62

0.000

-12.8

48.4

-1813.9

1.400

-12.8

29.9

-1835.5

2.900

-12.8

11.5

-1857.1

4.300

-12.8

-7.0

-1878.6

5.800

-12.8

-25.4

-1900.2

7.200

-12.8

-43.8

-1921.7

63
63
63
63
63
63

0.000

-4.2

16.2

-1851.3

1.500

-4.2

10.0

-1873.1

2.900

-4.2

3.8

-1895.0

4.400

-4.2

-2.4

-1916.9

5.800

-4.2

-8.6

-1938.7

7.300

-4.2

-14.8

-1960.6

64
64
64
64
64
64

0.000

4.9

-18.1

-1846.2

1.500

4.9

-10.9

-1868.3

3.000

4.9

-3.7

-1890.5

4.400

4.9

3.4

-1912.6

5.900

4.9

10.6

-1934.8

7.400

4.9

17.8

-1957.0

65
65
65
65
65
65

0.000

12.7

-48.9

-1812.1

1.500

12.7

-30.2

-1834.1

2.900

12.7

-11.5

-1856.2

4.400

12.7

7.3

-1878.3

5.900

12.7

26.0

-1900.3

7.400

12.7

44.7

-1922.4

66
66
66
66
66
66

0.000

19.6

-73.5

-1682.8

1.500

19.6

-45.1

-1704.6

2.900

19.6

-16.6

-1726.3

4.400

19.6

11.9

-1748.1

5.800

19.6

40.4

-1769.9

7.300

19.6

68.9

-1791.7

90

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 91
Revision No: 0

Footing
Location of Maximum design actions:
Column area
636173 mm2
Equivalent square section side length
798 mm2
Effective depth at support, assume 70 cover, 20 mm trasverse bars, 24 dia longitudinal bars
Effective depth = 900 - 70 - 20 -24/2 =
798 mm
Critical section distance from column CL:
Bending at support: 0.15D from face =
279 mm from centre
Shear at support: d from face
1197 mm from centre
Design actions, M* and V* (axial force is small and is neglected for design purposes)

X
Negative Bending moment (mid-span)
Positive bending moment
Distance from column CL
0.00
0.30
Design section
0.279
Shear Force
Distance from column CL
0.90
1.30
Design section
1.197

ULS

SLS DL + SLS DL only


LL
-847.2
-598.0
-246.1 kNm

2200.4
850.2
944.0
-1297.0
-485.1
-694.6

1512.1
600.8
664.1

631.2 kNm
354.8 kNm
374.0 kNm
kN
kN
kN

91

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 92
Revision No: 0

ULS : Footing Shear Force Diagram


Sher Force, kN

3000.0

-15.000

2000.0
1000.0

-10.000

-5.000

0.0
0.000
-1000.0

5.000

10.000

15.000
ULS
Min
Sup

-2000.0
-3000.0
-4000.0

ULS: Footing Bending Moment Diagram


2500.0
2000.0

ULS Min
Support

Bending Moment, kNm

1500.0

-15.000

1000.0
500.0

-10.000

-5.000

0.0
0.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

-500.0
-1000.0
-1500.0

92

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
ULS; maximum support stiffness

Beam No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48

Shear
Force 2

Page No: 93
Revision No: 0

ULS; minimum support stiffness

Bending
Moment 2

Axial
Force

Beam No

-9.800

349.6

136.5

0.0

1.0

-9.400

1082.3

547.7

0.1

-9.100

1819.3

1235.3

0.1

-8.700

2559.3

2200.4

0.0

-8.300

-2950.6

850.2

24.7

-7.900

-2118.8

-43.5

24.7

-7.400

-1297.0

-587.8

24.6

-7.000

-485.1

-787.1

24.4

-6.600

318.9

-644.7

24.3

-6.200

1117.5

-162.8

24.3

-5.700

1912.9

657.0

24.2

-5.300

2705.5

1813.8

24.0

-4.900

-2726.2

667.5

21.8

-4.500

-1949.6

-154.2

21.8

-4.000

-1186.4

-651.5

21.6

-3.600

-436.0

-830.0

21.4

-3.200

303.6

-694.0

21.3

-2.800

1035.3

-247.2

21.2

-2.300

1761.4

508.3

21.1

-1.900

2482.7

1570.3

21.0

-1.500

-2490.2

571.5

5.6

-1.100

-1787.2

-181.2

5.6

-0.600

-1098.1

-641.0

5.4

-0.200

-422.2

-813.5

5.2

0.200

242.7

-703.5

5.1

0.600

899.2

-314.4

5.0

1.100

1549.8

351.2

5.0

1.500

2195.6

1291.2

4.8

1.900

-2184.3

397.0

-4.1

2.300

-1555.0

-257.0

-4.2

2.800

-937.3

-648.4

-4.3

3.200

-330.4

-781.9

-4.5

3.600

267.8

-661.2

-4.6

4.000

860.1

-288.8

-4.6

4.500

1448.6

333.7

-4.6

4.900

2034.4

1205.3

-4.7

5.300

-1920.1

368.0

-0.1

5.700

-1345.9

-197.1

-0.2

6.200

-780.8

-522.1

-0.3

6.600

-224.0

-610.4

-0.4

7.000

326.0

-464.9

-0.4

7.400

871.5

-87.7

-0.5

7.900

1414.0

520.2

-0.5

8.300

1953.6

1357.3

-0.6

8.700

-1600.6

751.7

0.3

9.100

-1135.5

331.2

0.2

9.400

-679.2

81.9

0.2

9.800

-232.6

0.0

0.1

2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
20.0
21.0
22.0
23.0
24.0
25.0
26.0
27.0
28.0
29.0
30.0
31.0
32.0
33.0
34.0
35.0
36.0
37.0
38.0
39.0
40.0
41.0
42.0
43.0
44.0
45.0
46.0
47.0
48.0

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48

Shear Force Bending Axial Force


2
Moment 2

-9.800

364.4

142.0

-0.4

-9.400

1116.7

566.1

-1.3

-9.100

1864.0

1270.5

-2.3

-8.700
-8.300
-7.900
-7.400

2606.1
-2935.2
-2108.1
-1289.1

2253.1
875.9
-13.1
-554.1

-3.4
27.9
26.8
25.6

-7.000

-478.1

-750.4

24.4

-6.600

324.9

-605.4

23.2

-6.200

1120.4

-122.4

22.1

-5.700

1908.4

695.6

21.1

-5.300

2689.0

1845.3

19.9

-4.900

-2710.3

687.6

21.1

-4.500

-1945.7

-132.5

20.0

-4.000

-1189.5

-631.1

18.9

-3.600

-441.7

-811.9

17.7

-3.200

297.8

-678.5

16.6

-2.800

1029.3

-234.2

15.5

-2.300

1753.0

517.7

14.5

-1.900

2469.1

1574.0

13.4

-1.500

-2506.4

557.6

0.0

-1.100

-1806.5

-203.3

-1.0

-0.600

-1115.2

-670.3

-2.1

-0.200

-432.5

-847.2

-3.2

0.200

242.0

-737.5

-4.2

0.600

908.5

-344.5

-5.1

1.100

1567.3

328.5

-6.1

1.500

2218.4

1278.2

-7.0

1.9
2.3
2.8
3.2

-2203.7
-1568.5
-941.5
-322.7

352.3
-307.4
-700.7
-830.9

-11.1
-12
-13
-13.9

3.600

288.2

-701.5

-14.8

4.000

891.4

-315.8

-15.6

4.500

1487.3

323.2

-16.4

4.900

2075.8

1212.3

-17.3

5.300

-1897.8

341.5

-3.4

5.700

-1324.5

-214.5

-4.2

6.200

-759.1

-530.2

-5.0

6.600

-201.5

-608.9

-5.9

7.000

348.4

-453.9

-6.6

7.400

890.9

-68.4

-7.3

7.900

1426.1

544.6

-8.1

8.300

1953.9

1381.9

-8.9

8.700

-1571.1

741.7

2.3

9.100

-1118.1

327.8

1.7

9.400

-671.4

81.3

1.0

9.800

-231.2

0.0

0.4

93

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 94
Revision No: 0

SLS: Footing Bending Moment Diagram

Bending Moment, kNm

2000.0

-15.000

1500.0
1000.0
500.0

-10.000

-5.000

0.0
0.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

-500.0
-1000.0

SLS: DL+LL

94

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report
SLS; DL + LL

Beam No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48

Page No: 95
Revision No: 0

SLS; DL only

Shear
Force 2

Bending
Moment 2

Axial
Force

Beam No

-9.800

241.8

95.2

-0.2

1.0

-9.400

746.6

379.6

-0.5

-9.100

1248.5

852.3

-0.9

-8.700

1747.6

1512.1

-1.3

-8.300

-1996.7

600.8

14.4

-7.900

-1439.1

-5.1

14.0

-7.400

-886.2

-376.0

13.6

-7.000

-338.0

-513.9

13.1

-6.600

205.7

-420.7

12.6

-6.200

744.9

-98.4

12.2

-5.700

1279.9

451.3

11.8

-5.300

1810.7

1226.6

11.3

-4.900

-1856.1

453.0

8.2

-4.500

-1334.5

-108.4

7.8

-4.000

-817.8

-450.2

7.3

-3.600

-306.1

-574.6

6.9

-3.200

200.8

-483.5

6.4

-2.800

703.2

-178.9

6.0

-2.300

1201.2

337.3

5.6

-1.900

1694.8

1063.4

5.2

-1.500

-1731.8

366.3

-4.5

-1.100

-1247.5

-158.2

-4.9

-0.600

-768.2

-478.9

-5.3

-0.200

-293.7

-598.0

-5.8

0.200

176.0

-517.5

-6.2

0.600

641.2

-239.2

-6.5

1.100

1102.1

234.9

-6.9

1.500

1558.6

903.1

-7.3

1.9
2.3

-1554.7
-1107.2

249.4
-215.4

-9.2
-9.6

2.800

-664.4

-492.0

-10.0

3.200

-226.2

-582.4

-10.4

3.600

207.4

-488.5

-10.7

4.000

636.8

-212.1

-11.0

4.500

1062.0

245.0

-11.3

4.900

1483.2

881.0

-11.7

5.300

-1374.9

257.2

-2.6

5.700

-962.3

-146.1

-2.9

6.200

-554.2

-375.9

-3.2

6.600

-150.6

-434.1

-3.5

7.000

248.7

-322.7

-3.9

7.400

643.8

-43.4

-4.2

7.900

1034.8

402.2

-4.4

8.300

1421.7

1012.1

-4.8

8.700

-1164.8

550.7

1.0

9.100

-830.6

243.7

0.7

9.400

-500.2

60.6

0.4

9.800

-173.4

0.0

0.2

2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
20.0
21.0
22.0
23.0
24.0
25.0
26.0
27.0
28.0
29.0
30.0
31.0
32.0
33.0
34.0
35.0
36.0
37.0
38.0
39.0
40.0
41.0
42.0
43.0
44.0
45.0
46.0
47.0
48.0

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48

Shear Force Bending Axial Force


2
Moment 2

-9.800

116.6

0.0

0.0

-9.400

326.5

39.3

0.0

-9.100

536.8

157.2

0.1

-8.7
-8.3

747.5
-813.1

354.1
552.1

0.1
20

-7.900

-573.7

200.8

20.0

-7.400

-334.1

-48.8

20.0

-7.000

-94.4

-196.6

20.0

-6.600

145.6

-242.4

20.1

-6.200

386.0

-186.2

20.1

-5.700

626.7

-28.0

20.1

-5.300

867.7

232.6

20.1

-4.900

-812.6

546.1

32.8

-4.500

-571.1

195.0

32.8

-4.000

-329.6

-53.4

32.8

-3.600

-88.0

-199.3

32.8

-3.200

153.8

-242.4

32.9

-2.800

395.7

-182.8

32.9

-2.300

638.0

-20.3

32.9

-1.900

880.5

245.1

32.9

-1.500

-837.4

596.8

37.1

-1.100

-594.8

235.2

37.1

-0.600

-352.2

-23.4

37.1

-0.200

-109.7

-178.8

37.1

0.200

132.7

-231.2

37.1

0.600

375.2

-180.5

37.1

1.100

617.8

-26.8

37.1

1.500

860.5

230.1

37.1

1.900

-853.7

610.1

32.3

2.300

-611.1

241.5

32.3

2.800

-368.8

-24.0

32.3

3.200

-126.8

-186.5

32.3

3.600

115.1

-246.1

32.2

4.000

356.8

-203.0

32.2

4.500

598.5

-57.0

32.2

4.900

840.2

191.6

32.2

5.300

-840.6

593.3

19.6

5.700

-599.3

230.4

19.6

6.200

-358.3

-30.1

19.6

6.600

-117.7

-188.1

19.6

7.000

122.6

-243.9

19.6

7.400

362.7

-197.5

19.6

7.900

602.7

-49.1

19.5

8.300

842.5

201.3

19.5

8.700

-725.2

631.2

0.1

9.100

-514.1

354.8

0.0

9.400

-303.3

157.6

0.0

9.800

-93.0

39.4

0.0

95

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 96
Revision No: 0

96

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 97
Revision No: 0

97

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 98
Revision No: 0

98

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 99
Revision No: 0

99

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 100


Revision No: 0

Test

Bending moment at base


Bending moment at top
Maximum axial load

M*
625.8

N*
3760.2

602.2

3887.8

532.1

5473

100

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 101


Revision No: 0

101

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 102


Revision No: 0

Attachment C - Substructure Design and Details

N24 bars @ 115mm spacing

Figure G.1: Headstock Cross-section and detailing

102

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 103


Revision No: 0

Figure G.2: Column Cross-section and detailing

103

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 104


Revision No: 0

Figure G.3: Footing Cross-section and detailing

104

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 105


Revision No: 0

Attachment G - Quantities and Cost Estimate


QUANTITIES OF MATERIALS
In order to estimate the cost of the materials needed for footing, column, and headstock
construction, volumes of concretes and steels are calculated from the design.
Area of the footing was used to find the total amount of blinding concrete N20, 75 mm thick.
Volume of columns, headstocks, and footings were used to calculate the total amount of concrete
class S50 needed. Lastly, the amount of reinforcement steel needed was determined from the total
cross-sectional area from each section.
Top of Column Coordinates
Headstock depth
1.7
Pier 1
Pier 2
Pier 3
X
Y
X
Y
X
Y
Column 1
-8.5 9.533736
-8.5 9.598924
-8.5 8.949025
Column 2
-5.1 9.52028
-5.1 9.698269
-5.1 9.157555
Column 3
-1.7 9.506825
-1.7 9.797615
-1.7 9.366086
Column 4
1.7 9.49337
1.7 9.89696
1.7 9.574616
Column 5
5.1 9.345195
5.1 9.868359
5.1 9.661756
Column 6
8.5 9.122012
8.5 9.768521
8.5 9.681309

Footing Node Coordinates


All Piers
X
Y
Left End
-10
2.05
Column 1
-8.5
2.05
Column 2
-5.1
2.05
Column 3
-1.7
2.05
Column 4
1.7
2.05
Column 5
5.1
2.05
Column 6
8.5
2.05
Right End
10
2.05

Height of Column = Top Column Coordinate - Footing Node Coordinate


Pier 1
Pier 2
Pier 3
Column 1
7.483735577 7.548924 6.899025
21.93168432
Column 2
7.470280259 7.648269 7.107555
22.22610467
Column 3
7.456824941 7.747615 7.316086
22.52052503
Column 4
7.443369623 7.84696 7.524616
22.81494538
Column 5
7.295194883 7.818359 7.611756
22.72530979
Column 6
7.072011527 7.718521 7.631309
22.42184086
134.6404101

Volume of Concrete
Volume of column 85.65453 m3
Volume of footing
54 m3
Volume of headstock
34.68 m3

Item
Substructure
Blinding concrete, 75 mm thick Class N20
Concrete Class S50
Spread footings
Columns
Headstocks
Reinforcement, Grade 500N, <= 16mm diameter
Reinforcement, Grade 500N, > 16mm diameter
Total

Steel Reinforcement
0.04021 m2
0.3934 m2
Headstock
Column
97.45582 m2
Total
97.88943 m2
Footing

Unit

Rate

Quantity

Cost

m3

500

13.50

6,750.00

m3
m3
m3

1200
1200
1500

54.00
85.65
34.68

64,800.00
102,785.43
52,020.00

tonne
tonne

2300
2500

97.89

244,723.57
471,079.00

105

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 106


Revision No: 0

Bridge Concrete Carbon Emission

The construction industry sector greatly impacts on the environment with the constant
construction of infrastructure and commercial and residential buildings across
Australia. Direct and indirect impacts are present with the use of land, materials and
energy which ultimately has a significant impact on the production of greenhouse gas
emissions and other wastes and fumes emitted from building materials used throughout
the construction period.
Various emission factors from the concrete utilised in construction of the Pritchard Street Bridge is
portrayed below in the Component Emission Table which states the emission factor values associated
with each construction material.
Table: Component emission table

Table: By product constituents of concrete

106

UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering


Document No:
CVEN 4002-DPA-01
Document:
Design Practice A
Design Report

Page No: 107


Revision No: 0

Research was conducted into the optimum percentage of industrial by products that can be used in the
manufacturing process of cement that best reduces the amount of carbon footprint released into the
environment while not compromising structure stability and safety. Such materials include fly ash,
limestone, lime sludge, mill scale and foundry sand. A study conducted by the Portland Cement
Association has revealed that the added usage of ground limestone will significantly lower carbon
emissions and reduces the level carbon dioxide into environment by approximately 2.6% per ton of
cement manufactured. According to a literature review on the limestone addition in cement by B T
(Tom) Benn, Adelaide Brighton Cement Ltd, Associate Professor Daksh Baweja, University of
Technology Sydney and Professor Julie E Mills, University of South Australia, the allowable usage
contents of limestone is between 8%-20% in the manufacturing of cement. Hence we have chosen the
value of 10% proportion of ground limestone to decrease the impact of carbon emissions throughout
the construction of the Pritchard Street Bridge while not compromising the compressive strength of
the concrete structure.
Table: Mineral additions

107

Anda mungkin juga menyukai