Anda di halaman 1dari 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Notices 54995

product, medical device, food additive, 1. The date an exemption under Dated: September 11, 2006.
or color additive) was subject to section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, Jane A. Axelrad,
regulatory review by FDA before the and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
item was marketed. Under these acts, a 355(i)) became effective: March 29, Evaluation and Research.
product’s regulatory review period 1998. The applicant claims June 30, [FR Doc. 06–7985 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am]
forms the basis for determining the 2003, as the date the investigational new BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
amount of extension an applicant may drug application (IND) became effective.
receive. However, FDA records indicate that the
A regulatory review period consists of IND effective date was March 29, 1998, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
two periods of time: A testing phase and which was 30 days after FDA receipt of HUMAN SERVICES
an approval phase. For human drug the original IND.
products, the testing phase begins when Food and Drug Administration
2. The date the application was
the exemption to permit the clinical [Docket No. 2006E–0033]
investigations of the human drug initially submitted with respect to the
product becomes effective and runs human drug product under section Determination of Regulatory Review
until the approval phase begins. The 505(b) of the act: April 26, 2004. The Period for Purposes of Patent
approval phase starts with the initial applicant claims April 23, 2004, as the Extension; APTIVUS
submission of an application to market date the new drug application (NDA) for
the human drug product and continues MYCAMINE (NDA 21–754) was initially AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,
until FDA grants permission to market submitted. However, FDA records HHS.
the product. Although only a portion of indicate that NDA 21–754 was initially ACTION: Notice.
a regulatory review period may count submitted on April 26, 2004.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
toward the actual amount of extension 3. The date the application was Administration (FDA) has determined
that the Director of Patents and approved: March 16, 2005. FDA has the regulatory review period for
Trademarks may award (for example, verified the applicant’s claim that NDA APTIVUS and is publishing this notice
half the testing phase must be 21–754 was approved on March 16, of that determination as required by
subtracted, as well as any time that may 2005. law. FDA has made the determination
have occurred before the patent was
This determination of the regulatory because of the submission of an
issued), FDA’s determination of the
review period establishes the maximum application to the Director of Patents
length of a regulatory review period for
potential length of a patent extension. and Trademarks, Department of
a human drug product will include all
However, the U.S. Patent and Commerce, for the extension of a patent
of the testing phase and approval phase
Trademark Office applies several which claims that human drug product.
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing statutory limitations in its calculations ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
the human drug product MYCAMINE of the actual period for patent extension. and petitions to the Division of Dockets
(mycafungin sodium). MYCAMINE is In its applications for patent extension, Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
indicated for treatment of patients with this applicant seeks 476 days of patent Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
esophageal candidiasis and prophylaxis term extension. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
of Candida infections in patients Anyone with knowledge that any of electronic comments to http://
undergoing hematopoietic stem cell www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
the dates as published are incorrect may
transplantation. Subsequent to this submit to the Division of Dockets FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
approval, the Patent and Trademark Management (see ADDRESSES) written or Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Office received patent term restoration electronic comments and ask for a Policy (HFD–7), Food and Drug
applications for MYCAMINE (U.S. redetermination by November 20, 2006. Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Patent Nos. 6,107,458 and 6,265,536) Furthermore, any interested person may Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
from Astellas Pharma, Inc., and the petition FDA for a determination SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Patent and Trademark Office requested regarding whether the applicant for Price Competition and Patent Term
FDA’s assistance in determining these extension acted with due diligence Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
patents’ eligibility for patent term during the regulatory review period by 417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
restoration. In a letter dated February March 19, 2007. To meet its burden, the Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
24, 2006, FDA advised the Patent and petition must contain sufficient facts to Law 100–670) generally provide that a
Trademark Office that this human drug patent may be extended for a period of
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
product had undergone a regulatory up to 5 years so long as the patented
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
review period and that the approval of item (human drug product, animal drug
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
MYCAMINE represented the first product, medical device, food additive,
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
permitted commercial marketing or use or color additive) was subject to
of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Comments and petitions should be regulatory review by FDA before the
Patent and Trademark Office requested submitted to the Division of Dockets item was marketed. Under these acts, a
that FDA determine the product’s Management. Three copies of any product’s regulatory review period
regulatory review period. mailed information are to be submitted, forms the basis for determining the
FDA has determined that the except that individuals may submit one amount of extension an applicant may
applicable regulatory review period for copy. Comments are to be identified receive.
MYCAMINE is 2,546 days. Of this time, with the docket number found in A regulatory review period consists of
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

2,221 days occurred during the testing brackets in the heading of this two periods of time: A testing phase and
phase of the regulatory review period, document. Comments and petitions may an approval phase. For human drug
while 325 days occurred during the be seen in the Division of Dockets products, the testing phase begins when
approval phase. These periods of time Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., the exemption to permit the clinical
were derived from the following dates: Monday through Friday. investigations of the human drug

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:40 Sep 19, 2006 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM 20SEN1
54996 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Notices

product becomes effective and runs 505(b) of the act: December 22, 2004. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
until the approval phase begins. The The applicant claims December 21, HUMAN SERVICES
approval phase starts with the initial 2004, as the date the new drug
submission of an application to market application (NDA) for Aptivus (NDA Food and Drug Administration
the human drug product and continues 21–814) was initially submitted. [Docket No. 2004E–0019]
until FDA grants permission to market However, FDA records indicate that
the product. Although only a portion of NDA 21–814 was submitted as a Determination of Regulatory Review
a regulatory review period may count complete marketing application on Period for Purposes of Patent
toward the actual amount of extension December 22, 2004. Extension; FUZEON
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, 3. The date the application was AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,
half the testing phase must be approved: June 22, 2005. FDA has HHS.
subtracted, as well as any time that may verified the applicant’s claim that NDA ACTION: Notice.
have occurred before the patent was 21–814 was approved on June 22, 2005.
issued), FDA’s determination of the SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
This determination of the regulatory
length of a regulatory review period for Administration (FDA) has determined
review period establishes the maximum
a human drug product will include all the regulatory review period for
potential length of a patent extension.
of the testing phase and approval phase FUZEON and is publishing this notice
However, the U.S. Patent and of that determination as required by
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B). Trademark Office applies several
FDA approved for marketing the law. FDA has made the determination
human drug product APTIVUS statutory limitations in its calculations because of the submission of an
(tipranavir). APTIVUS is indicated for of the actual period for patent extension. application to the Director of Patents
combination antiretroviral treatment of In its application for patent extension, and Trademarks, Department of
HIV–1 infected adult patients with this applicant seeks 1,278 days of patent Commerce, for the extension of a patent
evidence of viral replication who are term extension. which claims that human drug product.
highly treatment-experienced or have Anyone with knowledge that any of ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
HIV–1 strains resistant to multiple the dates as published are incorrect may and petitions to the Division of Dockets
protease inhibitors. Subsequent to this submit to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
approval, the Patent and Trademark Management (see ADDRESSES) written or Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
Office received a patent term restoration electronic comments and ask for a 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
application for APTIVUS (U.S. Patent redetermination by November 20, 2006. electronic comments to http://
No. 5,852,195) from Pharmacia & Furthermore, any interested person may www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
Upjohn Co., LLC, and the Patent and petition FDA for a determination FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trademark Office requested FDA’s Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
regarding whether the applicant for
assistance in determining this patent’s Policy (HFD–7), Food and Drug
extension acted with due diligence
eligibility for patent term restoration. In Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
a letter dated February 24, 2006, FDA during the regulatory review period by
March 19, 2007. To meet its burden, the Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human drug product had petition must contain sufficient facts to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
undergone a regulatory review period merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Price Competition and Patent Term
and that the approval of APTIVUS Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
represented the first permitted pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in 417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
commercial marketing or use of the the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30. Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent Law 100–670) generally provide that a
Comments and petitions should be
and Trademark Office requested that patent may be extended for a period of
submitted to the Division of Dockets up to 5 years so long as the patented
FDA determine the product’s regulatory Management. Three copies of any
review period. item (human drug product, animal drug
mailed information are to be submitted, product, medical device, food additive,
FDA has determined that the
except that individuals may submit one or color additive) was subject to
applicable regulatory review period for
APTIVUS is 3,114 days. Of this time, copy. Comments are to be identified regulatory review by FDA before the
2,931 days occurred during the testing with the docket number found in item was marketed. Under these acts, a
phase of the regulatory review period, brackets in the heading of this product’s regulatory review period
while 183 days occurred during the document. Comments and petitions may forms the basis for determining the
approval phase. These periods of time be seen in the Division of Dockets amount of extension an applicant may
were derived from the following dates: Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., receive.
1. The date an exemption under Monday through Friday. A regulatory review period consists of
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, Dated: September 1, 2006. two periods of time: A testing phase and
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. an approval phase. For human drug
Jane A. Axelrad,
355(i)) became effective: December 14, products, the testing phase begins when
1996. The applicant claims December Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug the exemption to permit the clinical
Evaluation and Research. investigations of the human drug
13, 1996, as the date the investigational
new drug application (IND) became [FR Doc. E6–15553 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am] product becomes effective and runs
effective. However, FDA records BILLING CODE 4160–01–S until the approval phase begins. The
indicate that the IND effective date was approval phase starts with the initial
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

December 14, 1996, which was 30 days submission of an application to market


after FDA receipt of the IND. the human drug product and continues
2. The date the application was until FDA grants permission to market
initially submitted with respect to the the product. Although only a portion of
human drug product under section a regulatory review period may count

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:40 Sep 19, 2006 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM 20SEN1

Anda mungkin juga menyukai