www.elsevier.com/locate/ultras
Abstract
Certain aspects of diusive ultrasound elds in concrete are still unknown and thus, systematic parameter studies using numerical
time-domain simulations of the ultrasonic propagation process could lead to further insights into theoretical and experimental
questions. In the present paper, the elastodynamic nite integration technique (EFIT) is used to simulate a diusive reverberation
measurement at a concrete specimen taking aggregates, pores, and viscoelastic damping explicitly into account. The numerical
results for dissipation and diusivity are compared with theoretical models. Moreover, the inuence of air-lled pores in the cement
matrix is demonstrated.
2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Diusive ultrasound; Concrete; Time-domain simulation; Elastodynamic nite integration technique
1. Introduction
For elastic wave propagation in the ultrasonic regime,
concrete represents a strongly heterogeneous medium
consisting of statistically varying aggregates and pores
embedded in a cement matrix. Additionally, structural
components like reinforcing bars and tendon ducts aect
the wave propagation process signicantly. In nondestructive testing, the interpretation of the received
ultrasonic signals may become extremely dicult due to
multiple scattering, strong attenuation, and mode conversions. Even the use of sophisticated averaging and
reconstruction techniques like synthetic aperture methods only allows the detection of defects being signicantly larger than the maximum aggregate size. Thus,
localised damage zones developing at length scales
smaller than the size of the majority of aggregates cannot be detected with typically used frequencies of less
than 100 kHz.
Increasing the frequency up to a few hundred kHz
changes the character of the wave propagation process
in concrete dramatically. While wave propagation in the
low-frequency region below 100 kHz is dominated by
the coherent eld, ultrasound becomes diusive at
higher frequencies which means dominance of the
0041-624X/$ - see front matter 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.040
z2
rt;
4Dt
782
Fig. 1. Formation of a diusive ultrasound eld in a concrete specimen caused by 200 kHz pulse excitation. The rst picture shows aggregates and
pores at an outer surface of the sample (9 9 cm2 ). The following three pictures represent time snapshots of the ultrasonic wave eld obtained by
scanning laser detection at the same surface. The ultrasonic transducer is located at the top surface of the specimen.
783
Table 1
Material parameters as used for the numerical simulations
Material
cL (m/s)
cT (m/s)
q (kg/m3 )
gV (Pa s)
gS (Pa s)
Cement
Aggregates
3950
4300 215
2250
2475 124
2050
2610 130
65
65 3.25
17
17 0.85
Air-lled pores were modelled as voids with stress-free boundary conditions. The values for cL , cT , and q are typical values for concrete well known
from eld measurements. They uctuate from one grain to another by 5% (maximum) around the given mean value. The values for gV and gS are only
roughly estimated. They were chosen in such a way that the signal damping in the simulation was close to typical experimental observations as given
in [2].
Fig. 2. Two-dimensional EFIT simulation of diusive ultrasound in a concrete beam. The rst picture shows the numerical concrete model consisting
of aggregates and pores embedded in a cement matrix (porosity 0.7%). The model contains 333 2997 grid cells. The following pictures are snapshots
of the elastic wave eld calculated in equidistant time steps of Dt 22:9 ls. They represent the absolute value of the particle velocity vector.
784
Fig. 5. Results of the numerical experiment for dissipation as a function of frequency (obtained at a single material conguration in each
case). The theoretical mean value according to the KelvinVoigt model
is given by the solid line. The porosity in this case was 0.7%.
785
3-D if using the same volume/area fractions for aggregates and pores [7].
Moreover, the strong rise of diusivity at low frequencies as predicted by the model [2], cannot be found
in our numerical results. This is maybe caused by the
domination of the coherent eld in this regime but the
exact reason for this discrepancy should be investigated
further. A 2-D version of the AnugondaTurner model
or alternatively a 3-D simulation would help to answer
these questions. Independent from that it is worth noting that preceding experiments and simulations clearly
revealed that porosity in concrete cannot be neglected
compared to the aggregates [7]. This is also conrmed by
the results shown in Fig. 6. As a consequence, appropriate enhancements of the AnugondaTurner model
need to be taken into consideration.
4. Conclusions
The results of the numerical experiments are plausible and consistent with the assumptions of a diusive
energy transport. While absorptivities obtained at the
discrete model are in a good agreement with the
KelvinVoigt model, the diusion coecients do not t
well to the AnugondaTurner model so far. However,
the numerical results reveal a signicant impact of
porosity on the diusion coecient. Due to the fact
that microstructural damage (e.g. by micro cracks) is
expected to have similar eects on wave scattering than
porosity, the use of high-frequency diusive ultrasound
could lead to new nondestructive methods for characterising material properties and damage in concrete
structures.
In the future, an ensemble averaging of the numerical
data by using various models with dierent scatterer
arrangements should lead to even more stable and reliable results. Moreover, a direct calculation of the energy
density from the elastic eld components will possibly
lead to further insights into still unsolved aspects of
diusivity in concrete.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for useful comments to improve the presentation
of the manuscript.
References
[1] B. Koehler, M. Kehlenbach, R. Bilgram, in: Acoustical Imaging,
vol. 27, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, Dordrecht & New
York, 2004, p. 315, in print.
[2] P. Anugonda, J.S. Wiehn, J.A. Turner, Ultrasonics 39 (2001) 429.
[3] R.L. Weaver, Ultrasonics 36 (1998) 435.
786
[6] F. Schubert, R. Marklein, in: Proceedings of 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Munich, Germany, 2003, p. 778 (article 5G-5, on
CD).
[7] F. Schubert, B. Koehler, J. Comput. Acoust. 9 (4) (2001) 1543.
[8] J.A. Turner, P. Anugonda, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 1787.