DOI 10.1007/s12105-012-0359-2
Received: 13 April 2012 / Accepted: 28 April 2012 / Published online: 24 May 2012
Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (Outside the USA) 2012
The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the author
and are not to be construed as official or representing the views of the
Department of the Navy or the Department of Defense.
G. G. Capra (&) D. P. Mullin
Department of Otolaryngology, Naval Medical Center San
Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, San Diego, CA 92134-5000,
USA
e-mail: gregory.capra@med.navy.mil
P. N. Carbone
Department of Anatomic Pathology, Naval Medical Center San
Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
History
A 54-year-old female with a history of cataracts was
referred by an ophthalmologist to the Otolaryngology
Clinic for acute worsening of visual acuity and diplopia in
the right eye. Symptoms began 5 months prior and were
described as a white curtain in her vision. Her ophthalmologic exam showed proptosis and chemosis of the eye
and her visual acuity ipsilaterally was 20/100 (baseline
20/25). The optic disc was pink and healthy on exam.
Cranial nerves III, IV, V, and VI were intact, with only
minimal impairment of extraocular muscle movement.
Radiographic Features
A non-contrast computerized tomographic (CT) scan of the
head and orbits showed a 4.4 cm 9 4.2 cm 9 3.3 cm
well-circumscribed expansile mass in the right ethmoid
sinus. The medial orbital wall was expanded with evidence
of mass effect upon the medial rectus muscle and optic
nerve (Fig. 1). Nuclear magnetic resonance images (MRI)
of the head with and without contrast demonstrated a
hyperintense mass on T2-weighted images (WI) and a
hypointensity on T1WI. The MR fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence suggested proteinaceous
fluid (Fig. 2).
Treatment
The mass was emergently decompressed through an
endoscopic approach in the operating room. Resistance to
retropulsion of the right eye resolved immediately and the
patients visual acuity returned to baseline within 24-h of
surgery.
123
370
Diagnosis
Histological examination of a hematoxylin and eosin
stained slide demonstrated benign respiratory mucosa with
mild chronic inflammatory infiltrate and areas of reactive
bone (Figs. 3, 4).
Discussion
Paranasal sinus mucoceles are epithelium-lined cystic
masses, are mucus filled, and result from obstruction of
sinus ostia. Mucus accumulation causes enlargement of the
mass with associated sinus bony wall expansion that is
Fig. 2 Axial MR imaging of the brain with T1WI (a), T2WI (b), and contrast-enhanced T1WI (c) demonstrating an ethmoid mucocele causing
mass effect on optic nerve and medial rectus
123
include the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth cranial nerves and,
rarely, the pituitary. Sphenoidal mucoceles are also more
commonly associated with headaches [1, 7, 8].
Radiographically, CT scans provide basic anatomical
detail of the mucocele, delineate its interaction with
neighboring bony structures, and aid in surgical planning.
CT scan findings show an expansile, homogenous sinus
mass that is not rim-enhancing, unless associated with an
acute mucopylocele. Bony destruction is not common but
expansion and remodeling of bone is seen in association
with the mucocele [2, 4]. MRI is superior in identifying the
relationship of the mucocele to neighboring soft tissue and
in distinguishing from other soft tissue neoplasms. Signal
intensity of T1WI and T2WI is dependent upon the viscosity and fluid content of the cyst [5]. On T2WI, mucoceles are hyperintense owing to their high water content.
With time, the intensity may diminish due to chronic inspissations. In contrast, T1WIs have low signal intensity
initially but, with water absorption and increased protein
concentration over time, a more viscous mucocele changes
from an isointense to hyperintense structure [4].
Histologically, mucoceles within the paranasal sinus
have features of respiratory mucosa with cyst walls demonstrating single-layered, pseudostratified, ciliated,
columnar epithelium [2, 3, 8]. Although metaplastic
changes are rare, chronic cases will show evidence of
squamous metaplasia. Reactive bone formation is also
possible in areas adjacent to cyst epithelium [2]. Mucoceles
show elevated expression of IL-12, which secondarily
leads to increased expression of IL-2 and interferon
gamma. Subsequently, an increased activation of TH2
lymphocytes hastens the presence of a chronic inflammatory infiltrate [3]. Additional findings include cholesterol
371
References
1. Loo JL, Looi AL, Seah LL. Visual outcomes in patient with
paranasal mucoceles. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;25:1269.
2. Thompson LDR, Wenig BM. Mucocele of paranasal sinus. In:
Diagnostic pathology: head and neck. Salt Lake City: Amirsys,
2011, p 45.
3. Obeso S, Llorente JL, Rodrigo JP, Sanchez R, Mancebo G, Suarez
C. Paranasal sinuses mucoceles. Our experience in 72 patients.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2009;60(5):3329.
4. Kao HW, Lo CP, Hsu YC, Chiu YC, Hsiao CH, Chen CY.
Sphenoid sinus mucocele presenting with optic canal syndrome.
J Med Sci. 2006;26(2):0614.
5. Lee TJ, Li SP, Fu CH, Huang CC, Chang PH, Chen YW, Chen
CW. Extensive paranasal sinus mucoceles: a 15-year review of 82
cases. Am J Otolaryngol Head Neck Med Surg. 2009;30:2348.
123
372
6. Yue CP, Mann KS, Chan FL. Optic canal syndrome due to
posterior ethmoid sinus mucocele. J Neurosurg. 1986;65:8713.
7. Kim YS, Kim K, Lee JG, Yoon JH, Kim CH. Paranasal sinus
mucoceles with ophthalmologic manifestations: a 17-year review
of 96 cases. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011;25:2725.
123