Anda di halaman 1dari 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices 39115

attachments, provide an index, number ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION monitoring, risk assessments, remedial
pages consecutively with the comments, AGENCY alternatives evaluations and short-term/
and submit an unbound original and long-term effects analyses.
three copies. [FRL–8195–3]
The Legacy Act program is not a grant
Instructions: Direct your comments to
‘‘Great Lakes Legacy Act—Request for program, and it is not an enforcement or
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–ORD–2004–
0002. EPA’s policy is that all comments Projects’’ regulatory program. The process for the
received will be included in the public selection of Legacy Act projects is not a
AGENCY: Environmental Protection grants competition, but it is based on
docket without change and may be Agency.
made available online at http:// the development of a negotiated Project
ACTION: Notice; funding availability. Agreement (PA) between USEPA and
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental
the non-federal sponsor. USEPA will
the comment includes information Protection Agency (USEPA) Great Lakes consider projects based on the extent to
claimed to be Confidential Business National Program Office (GLNPO) is which they meet the requirements of the
Information (CBI) or other information requesting proposals for projects, for up Legacy Act and the RFP.
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. to $29,600,000, addressing The non-federal share of the cost of a
Do not submit information that you contaminated sediment problems in project shall be at least 35% of the total
consider to be CBI or otherwise Great Lakes Areas of Concern located project costs in those cases where no
protected through http:// wholly or partially in the United States responsible parties are clearly
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The (U.S. AOCs) as outlined in the Great identified; when the non-federal
www.regulations.gov Web site is an Lakes Legacy Act of 2002 (the Legacy sponsor is a responsible party, USEPA
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which Act). will require a substantially higher
means EPA will not know your identity contribution (minimum of 40–50%).
or contact information unless you DATES: The deadline for all Project
proposals is 5 p.m. Central Time, The non-federal sponsor is also
provide it in the body of your comment.
September 15, 2006. responsible for 100% of cost of
If you send an e-mail comment directly
ADDRESSES: U.S. EPA Great Lakes operation and maintenance of the
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail National Program Office (G–17J), 77 W. project. The non-federal share may
address will be automatically captured Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604. include the value of in-kind services
and included as part of the comment FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
contributed by the non-federal sponsor,
that is placed in the public docket and Marc Tuchman, 312–353–1369/ and may include funds or in-kind
made available on the Internet. If you tuchman.marc@epa.gov. services provided pursuant to an
submit an electronic comment, EPA administrative order on consent or a
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The judicial consent decree. The non-federal
recommends that you include your Request for Projects (RFP) is available
name and other contact information in share of the cost of a project may not
on the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/ include any funds paid pursuant to, or
the body of your comment and with any glla. The purpose of this request is to
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA the value of any in-kind service
solicit project proposals that would help performed under, a unilateral
cannot read your comment due to to implement the Great Lakes Legacy
technical difficulties and cannot contact administrative order or court order.
Act. In order to receive funding under
you for clarification, EPA may not be the Legacy Act, projects must be located GLNPO will review Legacy Act
able to consider your comment. in one of the 31 U.S. Great Lakes AOCs. project proposals as they are received.
Electronic files should avoid the use of Top priority will be given to projects GLNPO intends to enter into PA
special characters, any form of that (1) Constitute remedial action for discussions with project applicants that
encryption, and be free of any defects or contaminated sediment; (2) have been meet the required components outlined
viruses. For additional information identified in a Remedial Action Plan in the RFP, and receive a high score (per
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA and are ready to be implemented; (3) the Legacy Act Rule), subject to the
Docket Center homepage at http:// use an innovative approach, technology, availability of funds. Projects that result
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. or technique that may provide greater in a PA will be funded with FY06 funds
Docket: All documents in the docket
environmental benefits, or equivalent to the extent they are available. Other
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
environmental benefits at a reduced projects that result in a PA will be
index. Although listed in the index,
cost; or (4) included remediation to be dependent upon funding, if any,
some information is not publicly
commenced not later than one year after received for the Legacy Act in FY07.
available, e.g., CBI or other information
the date of receipt of funds for the Refer to ‘‘Final Rule: Implementation
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
project. Remediation projects would of the Great Lakes Legacy Act of 2002’’
Certain other material, such as
include, but are not limited to, remedial
copyrighted material, will be publicly at http://www.epa.gov/glla/rule/ for
options such as: dredging, capping,
available only in hard copy. Publicly more detailed information on EPA’s
monitored natural recovery, treatment
available docket materials are available process for identification, evaluation,
technologies, or a combination of
either electronically in http:// selection, and implementation of
remedial alternatives for contaminated
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at projects for funding under the Legacy
sediment.
the OEI Docket in the EPA Headquarters Act.
The next priority level would be given
Docket Center. Funding (through project agreements)
to projects that seek to monitor or
Dated: July 5, 2006. evaluate contaminated sediment or is available pursuant to section 118(c) of
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Peter W. Preuss, prevent further or renewed the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
Director, National Center for Environmental contamination of sediment. These (33 U.S.C. 1268(c)). States, tribes,
Assessment. projects could include: site industry, non-governmental
[FR Doc. E6–10870 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am] characterizations, site assessments, organizations, and other stakeholders
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P source identification/source control, are eligible to apply.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:49 Jul 10, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM 11JYN1
39116 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices

Dated: June 23, 2006. for additional information should it be August 10, 2006. This determination
Gary V. Gulezian, deemed necessary. shall become effective on August 10,
Director, Great Lakes National Program To Apply: Send a brief description 2006 if no timely and appropriate
Office. (one page or less) of the water efficient request for a hearing is received and the
[FR Doc. E6–10868 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am] practice. Please remember to include Regional Administrator does not elect
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P your contact information. on his own to hold a hearing, and if no
DATES: Applications must be comments are received which cause
postmarked by July 21, 2006 in order to EPA to modify its tentative approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION be considered.
AGENCY ADDRESSES: Comments or a request for
ADDRESSES: Send applications to: a public hearing must be submitted to
Stephanie Thornton, 1200 Pennsylvania the U.S. Environmental Protection
[FRL–8195–9]
Ave., NW., Mail Code 4101M, Agency Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
2006 Water Efficiency Leader Washington, DC 20460. Additional Philadelphia, PA 19103–2029.
Awards—Call for Applicants information on the recognition program Comments may also be submitted
is available at http://www.epa.gov/ow. electronically to
AGENCY: Environmental Protection FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: gambatese.jason@epa.gov. All
Agency (EPA). Stephanie Thornton, Telephone: (202) documents relating to this
ACTION: Notice. 564–0269. E-mail: determination are available for
thornton.stephanie@epa.gov. inspection between the hours of 8 a.m.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
opening of the application period for the Dated: June 22, 2006. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
U.S. EPA’s first annual Water Efficiency Benjamin H. Grumbles, at the following offices:
Leader Awards. The awards recognize Assistant Administrator for Water. • Drinking Water Branch, Water
those organizations and individuals [FR Doc. E6–10864 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am] Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
who are providing leadership and BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Protection Agency Region III, 1650 Arch
innovation in water efficient products Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103–2029.
and practices. These proposed awards • Maryland Department of the
are intended to help foster a nationwide ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Environment, 1800 Washington Blvd.,
ethic of water efficiency, as well as to AGENCY
Baltimore, MD 21230.
inspire, motivate, and recognize efforts
[FRL–8193–8]
to improve water efficiency. This FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
program will enable EPA to document Notice of Tentative Approval and Jason Gambatese, Drinking Water
‘‘best practices’’, share information, Solicitation of Request for a Public Branch at the Philadelphia address
encourage an ethic of water efficiency, Hearing for Public Water System given above; telephone (215) 814–5759
and create a network of water efficiency Supervision Program Revision for the or fax (215) 814–2318.
leaders. Recognition will be given on State of Maryland
the basis of persuasive community or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All
organizational leadership in the area of AGENCY: Environmental Protection interested parties are invited to submit
water efficiency, originality and Agency (EPA). written comments on this determination
innovativeness, national/global and may request a public hearing. All
ACTION: Notice of tentative approval and
perspective and implications, and Solicitation of Requests for a Public comments will be considered, and, if
overall improvements in water Hearing. necessary, EPA will issue a response.
efficiency. Actual (as opposed to Frivolous or insubstantial requests for a
anticipated) results are preferred and SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in hearing may be denied by the Regional
applicants should be able to accordance with the provision of section Administrator. However, if a substantial
demonstrate the amount of water saved. 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act as request for a public hearing is made by
Candidates may be from anywhere in amended, and the National Primary August 10, 2006, a public hearing will
the United States, they may work in Drinking Water Regulations be held. A request for public hearing
either the public or the private sector, Implementation that the State of shall include the following: (1) The
and they may be either self-nominated Maryland is revising its approved Public name, address, and telephone number of
or nominated by a third party. The Water System Supervision Program. the individual, organization, or other
following sectors are encouraged to Maryland has adopted the Long Term 1 entity requesting a hearing; (2) a brief
apply: Corporations, Industry, Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule statement of the requesting person’s
Individuals, Non-Governmental to improve control of microbial interest in the Regional Administrator’s
Organizations and other Associations, pathogens in drinking water, including determination and of information that
Institutions, and Teams, Local, State, specifically the protozoan the requesting person intends to submit
Tribal, and Federal Governments, and Cryptosporidium. at such a hearing; and (3) the signature
Military Individuals and Organizations. EPA has determined that these of the individual making the request; or,
In order to be considered, applicants revisions are no less stringent than the if the request is made on behalf of an
must have a satisfactory compliance corresponding Federal regulations. organization or other entity, the
record with respect to environmental Therefore, EPA has decided to signature of a responsible official of the
regulations and requirements. tentatively approve these program organization or other entity.
Applications will be judged by a panel revisions. All interested parties are
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Dated: June 12, 2006.


of national water efficiency experts from invited to submit written comments on
this determination and may request a Donald S. Welsh,
a variety of sectors. The panelists will
provide recommendations to EPA, who public hearing. Regional Administrator, EPA, Region III.
will then make the final decision. EPA DATES: Comments or a request for a [FR Doc. E6–10854 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am]
reserves the right to contact nominees public hearing must be submitted by BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:49 Jul 10, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM 11JYN1

Anda mungkin juga menyukai