x1 x2 ,
This problem set corresponds to the 20092010 paper. All errors are my own.
Department of Economics, University of Oxford
matthew.polisson@economics.ox.ac.uk
1
Note that we only assume that a consumer prefers more money to less.
2
1 2
Cobb-Douglas preferences are generally represented by u(x1 , x2 ) = x
1 x2 , where 1 , 2 > 0 and
M. POLISSON
infinitesimal increase in x2 as M U2 . Let u(x1 , x2 ) = 6 and graph the corresponding indifference curve. Mark and label (4, 9) on the indifference curve. What is
the MRS at (4, 9), where M U1 = 3/4 and M U2 = 1/3? Why is M U1 > M U2
at this bundle? Now mark and label (9, 4) on the indifference curve. What is
the MRS at (9, 4), where M U1 = 1/3 and M U2 = 3/4? Why is M U2 > M U1
at this bundle? Why is the MRS at (4, 9) different from the MRS at (9, 4)?
6. Since u() in the previous problem represents an ordering, a consumers preferences are equivalently represented by any monotonic transformation of u().
Consider the transformation
v(x1 , x2 ) = ln(u(x1 , x2 )).
What is the functional form for v()? What can you say about the MRS at
(4, 9) and the MRS at (9, 4) relative to those from the previous problem? What
can you say about M U1 and M U2 at (4, 9) and (9, 4) relative to those from the
previous problem? Explain the intuition behind this result.
7. What is the difference between ordinal and cardinal utility?
8. Graph indifference curves for perfect substitutes and perfect complements. Suggest a utility function for each.
9. A consumer has rational (complete, transitive), well-behaved (locally non-satiated,
convex), and continuous preferences represented by
u(x1 , x2 ) = x1 x2 ,
where x1 0 and x2 0 denote quantities of Goods 1 and 2, respectively. If
the consumer has income m > 0 and faces prices p1 , p2 > 0 for Goods 1 and 2,
respectively, calculate demand functions for Goods 1 and 2.3
10. Briefly explain why a consumers optimal choice in a world of two goods is
found where the MRS equals the relative price ratio between these two goods.
REFERENCES
Varian, H. R. (2006): Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach, 7th edn. New York: W.
W. Norton.
often where 1 +2 = 1. This form is commonly used in economics because it produces well-behaved
indifference curves and because it is analytically tractable.
3
The mathematical techniques used to solve this problem are not formally introduced until later.
See Varian (2006), p. 9094.