Anda di halaman 1dari 4

33658

Proposed Rules Federal Register


Vol. 71, No. 112

Monday, June 12, 2006

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER • DOT Docket Web site: Go to Statement in the Federal Register
contains notices to the public of the proposed http://dms.dot.gov and follow the published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
issuance of rules and regulations. The instructions for sending your comments 19477–78), or you may visit http://
purpose of these notices is to give interested electronically. dms.dot.gov.
persons an opportunity to participate in the • Government-wide rulemaking Web
rule making prior to the adoption of the final Examining the Docket
rules.
site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending You may examine the AD docket on
your comments electronically. the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • Mail: Docket Management Facility; person at the Docket Management
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
Federal Aviation Administration Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. Federal holidays. The Docket
14 CFR Part 39 • Fax: (202) 493–2251. Management Facility office (telephone
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on (800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
[Docket No. FAA 2006–24983; Directorate the plaza level of the Nassif Building, level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
Identifier 2005–NM–196–AD] 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, street address stated in the ADDRESSES
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday section. Comments will be available in
RIN 2120–AA64 the AD docket shortly after the Docket
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Management System receives them.
A318, A319, A320, and A321 Airplanes Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France, Discussion
for service information identified in this
AGENCY: Federal Aviation proposed AD. On May 28, 2004, we issued AD
Administration (FAA), Department of 2004–11–13, amendment 39–13659 (69
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Transportation (DOT). FR 31867, June 8, 2004), for all Airbus
Dulin, Aerospace Engineer, Model A318, A319, A320, and A321
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, airplanes. That AD currently requires a
(NPRM). Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 one-time inspection to determine the
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington serial number (S/N) of both main
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2141; landing gear (MLG) sliding tubes,
supersede an existing airworthiness fax (425) 227–1149.
directive (AD) that applies to all Airbus repetitive inspections for cracking of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: MLG sliding tubes, and corrective
Model A318, A319, A320, and A321
airplanes. The existing AD currently Comments Invited actions if necessary. That AD resulted
requires a one-time inspection to from a report that a linear crack was
We invite you to submit any relevant found in a MLG sliding tube at the
determine the serial number of both written data, views, or arguments
main landing gear (MLG) sliding tubes, intersection of the cylinder and the axle
regarding this proposed AD. Send your due to a non-metallic inclusion in the
repetitive detailed inspections for comments to an address listed in the
cracking of the affected MLG sliding base metal, and another report that the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number of MLG sliding tubes subject to
tubes, and corrective actions if number ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2006–24983;
necessary. This proposed AD would the identified unsafe condition had
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–196– expanded. We issued that AD to detect
retain these inspections and add new AD’’ at the beginning of your comments.
repetitive inspections for cracking of the and correct cracking in an MLG sliding
We specifically invite comments on the tube, which could result in failure of the
MLG sliding tubes. This proposed AD overall regulatory, economic,
would also require eventual sliding tube, loss of one axle, and
environmental, and energy aspects of consequent reduced controllability of
replacement of both MLG shock the proposed AD. We will consider all
absorbers. Doing this replacement the airplane.
comments received by the closing date
would terminate the repetitive and may amend the proposed AD in Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
inspection requirements of this light of those comments. The preamble to AD 2004–11–13
proposed AD. This proposed AD results We will post all comments we specified that we considered the
from a determination that additional receive, without change, to http:// requirements ‘‘interim action’’ and that
inspections and mandatory replacement dms.dot.gov, including any personal the manufacturer was developing a
of the MLG shock absorbers are information you provide. We will also modification to address the unsafe
necessary. We are proposing this AD to post a report summarizing each condition. That AD explained that we
detect and correct cracking in an MLG substantive verbal contact with FAA may consider further rulemaking if a
sliding tube, which could result in personnel concerning this proposed AD. modification is developed, approved,
failure of the sliding tube, loss of one Using the search function of that Web and available. We have now determined
axle, and consequent reduced site, anyone can find and read the that additional detailed inspections and
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS

controllability of the airplane. comments in any of our dockets, magnetic particle inspections (MPI) and
DATES: We must receive comments on including the name of the individual eventual sliding tube replacement are
this proposed AD by July 12, 2006. who sent the comment (or signed the necessary to ensure safe operation and
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following comment on behalf of an association, has issued revised service information.
addresses to submit comments on this business, labor union, etc.). You may Therefore, we have determined that
proposed AD. review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act further rulemaking is indeed necessary;

VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:57 Jun 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM 12JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules 33659

this proposed AD follows from that The Direction Générale de l’Aviation Airbus Service Bulletin A320–32A1273,
determination. Civile (DGAC) mandated the service Revision 02, described previously.
information and issued French
Relevant Service Information Changes to Existing AD
airworthiness directive F–2005–115,
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin dated July 6, 2005, to ensure the Due to the new requirements of this
A320–32A1273, Revision 02, including continued airworthiness of these proposed AD, paragraphs (h), (i), and (j)
Appendix 01; dated May 26, 2005, to airplanes in France. French of AD 2004–11–13 have been revised as
replace All Operators Telex (AOT) airworthiness directive F–2005–115 applicable and incorporated as new
32A1273, Revision 01, dated May 6, replaces French airworthiness directive paragraphs (l), (m), and (n) of this
2004. (AD 2004–11–13 refers to UF–2004–065, dated May 11, 2004, proposed AD.
Revision 01 of the AOT as the which was referenced in AD 2004–11–
appropriate source of service 13. Clarification of Inspection Terminology
information for certain actions.) The
service bulletin retains the one-time FAA’s Determination and Requirements In this proposed AD, the ‘‘detailed
general visual inspection to determine of the Proposed AD visual inspection’’ specified in French
the S/N of both MLG sliding tubes and These airplane models are airworthiness directive F–2005–115 is
the repetitive detailed inspections for manufactured in France and are type referred to as a ‘‘detailed inspection.’’
cracking of the sliding tube of the MLG certificated for operation in the United We have included the definition for a
shock absorber described by the AOT. States under the provisions of section detailed inspection in a note in the
The service bulletin also describes 21.29 of the Federal Aviation proposed AD.
procedures for new repetitive detailed Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the Costs of Compliance
inspections and new MPIs of the sliding applicable bilateral airworthiness
tube, and eventual replacement of both agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral This proposed AD would affect about
MLG shock absorbers with new or airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has 720 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
serviceable MLG shock absorbers kept the FAA informed of the situation following table provides the estimated
equipped with sliding tubes having S/ described above. We have examined the costs for U.S. operators to comply with
Ns not listed in the service information. DGAC’s findings, evaluated all pertinent this proposed AD at an estimated cost
Accomplishing the actions specified in information, and determined that AD of $80 per work hour. Operators should
the service information is intended to action is necessary for airplanes of this note that, although all U.S.-registered
adequately address the unsafe type design that are certificated for airplanes are subject to the requirements
condition. operation in the United States. of the existing AD, there are only 297
The service bulletin refers to Messier- This proposed AD would supersede possible affected MLG sliding tubes in
Dowty Service Bulletins 201–32–43, AD 2004–11–13 and would continue to the worldwide fleet. We have no way of
Revision 1 (for Airbus Model A321 require a one-time general visual knowing how many affected MLG
airplanes), and 200–32–286, Revision 1 inspection to determine the S/N of both sliding tubes, if any, are installed in
(for Airbus Model A318, A319, and MLG sliding tubes and the repetitive U.S.-registered airplanes. Therefore, the
A320 airplanes); both dated May 1, detailed inspections for cracking of the estimated costs to perform the new
2005, as additional sources of service sliding tube of the MLG shock absorber. requirements of this proposed AD apply
information for accomplishing the This proposed AD would also require only to individual sliding tubes; no fleet
detailed inspections and MPIs. accomplishing the actions specified in cost can be determined for these actions.

ESTIMATED COSTS TO PERFORM REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING AD 2004–11–13


Work Cost per
Action Parts Fleet cost
hours airplane

General visual inspection to determine serial number .................................................... 1 None ........ $80 $57,600

ESTIMATED COSTS TO PERFORM NEW REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PROPOSED AD


Work
Action Parts Cost per sliding tube
hours

Detailed inspection ............................................................................................... 1 None ............................ $80, per inspection cycle.


Detailed inspection and MPI ................................................................................. 9 None ............................ $720, per inspection
cycle.
Replacement of sliding tube. ................................................................................ 8 $38,278 to $45,310 ..... $39,918 to $45,950

Authority for This Rulemaking We are issuing this rulemaking under is within the scope of that authority
the authority described in Subtitle VII, because it addresses an unsafe condition
Title 49 of the United States Code Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, that is likely to exist or develop on
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that products identified in this rulemaking
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS

section, Congress charges the FAA with action.


Section 106, describes the authority of promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Regulatory Findings
air commerce by prescribing regulations
Aviation Programs, describes in more for practices, methods, and procedures We have determined that this
detail the scope of the Agency’s the Administrator finds necessary for proposed AD would not have federalism
authority. safety in air commerce. This regulation implications under Executive Order

VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:57 Jun 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM 12JNP1
33660 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules

13132. This proposed AD would not which could result in failure of the sliding that inspection, do the detailed inspection
have a substantial direct effect on the tube, loss of one axle, and consequent required by paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this AD.
States, on the relationship between the reduced controllability of the airplane.
New Requirements of This AD
national Government and the States, or Compliance
Detailed Inspection and MPI
on the distribution of power and (e) You are responsible for having the
responsibilities among the various actions required by this AD performed within (h) For any airplane equipped with any
levels of government. the compliance times specified, unless the MLG having a sliding tube installed that is
actions have already been done. identified with a S/N listed in the service
For the reasons discussed above, I information: Within 500 flight cycles after
certify that the proposed regulation: Service Information References the effective date of this AD, perform a
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory (f) The term ‘‘service information,’’ as used detailed inspection and an MPI of the MLG
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; in this AD, means Airbus All Operators Telex sliding tube for cracking in accordance with
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the (AOT) A320–32A1273, Revision 01, dated the service information. Repeat these
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures May 6, 2004; or the Accomplishment inspections thereafter at intervals not to
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320– exceed 1,200 flight cycles until paragraph (i)
32A1273, Revision 02, including Appendix of this AD has been accomplished. If any
3. Will not have a significant cracking is discovered during any inspection
economic impact, positive or negative, 01, dated May 26, 2005. After the effective
date of this AD, only Airbus Service Bulletin required by this paragraph, before further
on a substantial number of small entities flight, replace the cracked sliding tube with
A320–32A1273, Revision 02, may be used.
under the criteria of the Regulatory Note 1: Airbus AOT A320–32A1273, a new or serviceable sliding tube in
Flexibility Act. Revision 01, and Airbus Service Bulletin accordance with the service information.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation A320–32A1273, Revision 02, refer to Replacing the MLG sliding tube with a
of the estimated costs to comply with Messier-Dowty Service Bulletins 201–32–43 sliding tube having a S/N not listed in the
and 200–32–286, both currently at Revision service information terminates the repetitive
this proposed AD and placed it in the inspection requirements of this paragraph
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section 1, dated May 1, 2005, as additional sources
of service information for accomplishing the and paragraph (g)(2)(i)(A) of this AD for that
for a location to examine the regulatory sliding tube only.
detailed inspections and magnetic particle
evaluation. inspections (MPI). Terminating Action
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Restatement of Certain Requirements of AD (i) Within 41 months after the effective
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 2004–11–13 date of this AD, replace all MLG shock
safety, Safety. absorbers equipped with sliding tubes having
Serial Number (S/N) Identification S/Ns listed in the service information with
The Proposed Amendment (g) For all airplanes: Within 30 days after new or serviceable MLG shock absorbers
June 23, 2004 (the effective date of AD 2004– equipped with sliding tubes having S/Ns not
Accordingly, under the authority 11–13), do a one-time general visual listed in the service information, using a
delegated to me by the Administrator, inspection to determine the S/N of both MLG method approved by either the Manager,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part sliding tubes, in accordance with the service International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
39 as follows: information. Instead of inspecting the MLG Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the DGAC (or
sliding tubes, reviewing the airplane its delegated agent). Chapter 32, page block
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS maintenance records is acceptable if the S/N 401, of the Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
DIRECTIVES of the MLG sliding tubes can be positively AMM is one approved method. Replacing the
determined from that review. MLG shock absorbers in accordance with this
1. The authority citation for part 39 (1) If the S/N of the MLG sliding tube is paragraph terminates all repetitive
continues to read as follows: not listed in the service information: No inspections required by this AD.
further action is required by this paragraph
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. for that sliding tube. Submission of Cracked Parts Not Required
(2) If the S/N of the MLG sliding tube is (j) The service information has instructions
§ 39.13 [Amended] listed in the service information: Do the to send any cracked part to Messier-Dowty.
2. The Federal Aviation actions in paragraph (g)(2)(i) or (g)(2)(ii) of This AD does not include such a
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 this AD, as applicable. requirement.
by removing amendment 39–13659 (69 (i) For any MLG not inspected before June
23, 2004: Before further flight, do a detailed Reporting Requirement
FR 31867, June 8, 2004) and adding the (k) Prepare a report of any crack found
inspection of the MLG for cracking in
following new airworthiness directive accordance with the service information. during any inspection required by paragraph
(AD): (A) If no cracking is found in any MLG (g) or (h) of this AD. Submit the report to
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2006–24983; sliding tube: Repeat the detailed inspection Airbus Customer Services, Engineering and
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–196–AD. thereafter at intervals not to exceed 10 days, Technical Support, Attention: M.Y. Quimiou,
until the MLG replacement specified by SEE33, fax +33+ (0) 5.6193.32.73, at the
Comments Due Date paragraph (g)(2)(i)(B), (h), or (i) of this AD has applicable time specified in paragraph (k)(1)
(a) The FAA must receive comments on been accomplished. or (k)(2) of this AD. The report must include
this AD action by July 12, 2006. (B) If any cracking is found in any MLG the MLG sliding tube P/N and S/N, date of
sliding tube: Before further flight replace the inspection, a description of any cracking
Affected ADs part with a new or serviceable part in found, the airplane serial number, and the
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2004–11–13. accordance with a method approved by number of flight cycles on the MLG at the
either the FAA or the Direction Generale de time of inspection. Under the provisions of
Applicability l’Aviation Civile (DGAC) (or its delegated the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44
(c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model agent). Chapter 32 of the Airbus A318/A319/ U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
A318, A319, A320, and A321 airplanes, A320/A321 Aircraft Maintenance Manual Management and Budget (OMB) has
certificated in any category. (AMM) is one approved method. Installing an approved the information collection
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS

MLG sliding tube having an S/N that is not requirements contained in this AD and has
Unsafe Condition listed in the service information terminates assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056.
(d) This AD results from a determination the repetitive inspections required by (1) For any inspection done after June 23,
that additional inspections and mandatory paragraph (h) of this AD for that MLG sliding 2004, but before the effective date of this AD:
replacement of the MLG shock absorbers are tube only. Within 30 days after the inspection or 30
necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect (ii) For any MLG that has been inspected days after the effective date of this AD,
and correct cracking in an MLG sliding tube, before June 23, 2004: Within 10 days after whichever comes first.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:57 Jun 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM 12JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday, June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules 33661

(2) For any inspection done after the disengagement of the telescopic girt bar comments in any of our dockets,
effective date of this AD: Within 30 days after from the airplane when the door is including the name of the individual
the inspection. opened in emergency situations, which who sent the comment (or signed the
Parts Installation could result in the inability to open the comment on behalf of an association,
(l) As of the effective date of this AD, no passenger door and to use the escape business, labor union, etc.). You may
person may install, on any airplane, any slide/raft at that door during an review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
sliding tube, or MLG shock absorber having emergency evacuation of the airplane. Statement in the Federal Register
a sliding tube installed, if the sliding tube has DATES: We must receive comments on published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
a S/N identified in the service information, this proposed AD by July 12, 2006. 19477–78), or you may visit http://
unless the sliding tube has been inspected, dms.dot.gov.
and any applicable corrective actions have ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
been done, in accordance with paragraph addresses to submit comments on this Examining the Docket
(g)(2)(i), (h), or (i) of this AD. proposed AD. You may examine the AD docket on
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
http://dms.dot.gov and follow the person at the Docket Management
(m)(1) The Manager, International Branch, instructions for sending your comments
ANM–116, has the authority to approve Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
electronically. p.m., Monday through Friday, except
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. • Government-wide rulemaking Web Federal holidays. The Docket
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov Management Facility office (telephone
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to and follow the instructions for sending (800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
which the AMOC applies, notify the your comments electronically. level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA • Mail: Docket Management Facility, street address stated in the ADDRESSES
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Office. section. Comments will be available in
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Related Information room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. Management System receives them.
(n) French airworthiness directive F–2005– • Fax: (202) 493–2251.
115, dated July 6, 2005, also addresses the • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on Discussion
subject of this AD. the plaza level of the Nassif Building, The Direction Générale de l’Aviation
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, Civile (DGAC), which is the
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 31,
2006. DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday airworthiness authority for France,
through Friday, except Federal holidays. notified us that an unsafe condition may
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice exist on certain Airbus Model A319,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France,
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. A320, and A321 airplanes. The DGAC
for service information identified in this advises that, during deployment tests of
[FR Doc. E6–9062 Filed 6–9–06; 8:45 am] proposed AD.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
slide rafts at the forward passenger
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan doors, cases of girt bar disengagement
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, from the floor fitting were reported.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, Investigations have demonstrated that
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 the girt bar disengagements were due to
Federal Aviation Administration Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington incorrect position of the stiff part of the
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2125; girt bar during installation of the slide
14 CFR Part 39 fax (425) 227–1149. raft on airplanes. This may cause
[Docket No. FAA–2006–24990; Directorate
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: inboard-directed loads on the girt bar,
Identifier 2006–NM–013–AD] preventing a correct engagement in the
Comments Invited
floor fittings. This condition, if not
RIN 2120–AA64 We invite you to submit any relevant corrected, could result in disengagement
written data, views, or arguments of the telescopic girt bar from the
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model regarding this proposed AD. Send your airplane when the door is opened in
A319, A320, and A321 Airplanes comments to an address listed in the emergency situations, which could
AGENCY: Federal Aviation ADDRESSES section. Include the docket result in the inability to open the
Administration (FAA), Department of number ‘‘FAA–2006–24990; Directorate passenger door and to use the escape
Transportation (DOT). Identifier 2006–NM–013–AD’’ at the slide/raft at that door during an
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking beginning of your comments. We emergency evacuation of the airplane.
(NPRM). specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic, Relevant Service Information
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a environmental, and energy aspects of Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
new airworthiness directive (AD) for the proposed AD. We will consider all A320–25–1394, Revision 01, dated
certain Airbus Model A319, A320, and comments received by the closing date December 12, 2005. The service bulletin
A321 airplanes. This proposed AD and may amend the proposed AD in describes procedures for a general visual
would require an inspection to light of those comments. inspection to determine whether the
determine if the stiff part of the girt and We will post all comments we stiff part of the girt and girt bar position
girt bar position of the forward left-hand receive, without change, to http:// of the forward left-hand and right-hand
and right-hand passenger doors is dms.dot.gov, including any personal passenger doors is incorrect, and repair
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS

incorrect, and repair if necessary. This information you provide. We will also if necessary. Accomplishing the actions
proposed AD results from cases of girt post a report summarizing each specified in the service information is
bar disengagement from the floor fitting substantive verbal contact with FAA intended to adequately address the
during deployment tests of slide rafts at personnel concerning this proposed AD. unsafe condition. The DGAC mandated
the forward passenger doors. We are Using the search function of that Web the service information and issued
proposing this AD to prevent site, anyone can find and read the French airworthiness directive F–2005–

VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:57 Jun 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM 12JNP1