Anda di halaman 1dari 71

CQI-12v2

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

AIAG Copyright and Trademark Notice:


2012 Automotive Industry Action Group, except that copyright is not claimed as to any part
of an original work prepared by a U.S. or state government officer or employee as part of the
persons official duties.
Except as noted above, all rights are reserved by AIAG and no part of these materials may be
reproduced, reprinted, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any
means, electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission
of Automotive Industry Action Group. Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law
subject to criminal and civil penalties.
AIAG and Automotive Industry Action Group are registered service marks of the Automotive
Industry Action Group. Automotive Industry Action Group makes no claim to any trademark of
a third party. Trademarks of third parties included in these materials are the property of their
respective owners
2012 Automotive Industry Action Group
2012 Automotive Industry Action Group

ISBN#: 978-1-60534-245-0-90000

CQI-12v2
Dated: 2/2012

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment 2nd Edition


Facility Name:
Address:

Phone Number:
Fax Number:
Number of Coating Employees at this Facility:
Captive Coater (Y/N):
Commercial Coater (Y/N):
Date of Assessment:
Date of Previous Assessment:

Type(s) of Coating Processes at this Facility:


Process Table A
Pretreatment, Aqueous
Process Table B
Pretreatment, Mechanical
Process Table C
Conversion Coating
Process Table D
Powder Coating
Process Table E
Spray
Process Table F
Electrocoat
Process Table G
Dip/Spin
Process Table H
Autodeposition
Process Table I
Cure
Process Table J
Anodizing
Process Table K
Equipment
Process Table L
Part Inspection & Testing

Current Quality Certification(s):


Date of Re-assessment (if necessary):
Personnel Contacted:
Name:

Title:

Phone:

Email:

Auditors/Assessors:
Name:

Company:

Phone:

Email:

Number of "Not Satisfactory" Findings:

Number of "Needs Immediate Action" Findings:

Number of "Fail" Findings in the Job Audit(s):

Number of Process Table Items not meeting Minimum Requirements:

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

Question

Requirements and Guidance

Objective Evidence

N/A

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning

1.1

1.2

Is there a dedicated and


qualified coating person onsite?

To ensure readily available expertise, there shall be a


dedicated and qualified coating person on the site.
This individual shall be a full-time employee and the
position shall be reflected in the organization chart. A
job description shall exist identifying the qualifications
for the position including chemical and coating
knowledge. The qualifications shall include a
minimum of 5 years experience in coating operation or
a combination of a minimum of 5 years of formal
chemical education and coating experience.

Does the coater perform


advanced quality planning?

The coater shall incorporate a documented advanced


quality planning procedure. A feasibility study shall be
performed and internally approved for each new part
or process. Similar parts can be grouped into part
families for this effort as defined by the coater. After
the part approval process is approved by the
customer, no process changes are allowed unless
approved by the customer. The coater shall contact
the customer when clarification of process changes is
required. This clarification of process changes shall
be documented.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

Question

Requirements and Guidance

1.3

The coater shall incorporate the use of a documented


Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) procedure
and ensure the FMEAs are updated to reflect current
part quality status. The FMEA shall be written for each
part or part family or they may be process-specific and
Are the coater's FMEA's up to written for each process. In any case, they shall
date and reflecting current
address all process steps from part receipt to part
processing?
shipment and all key coating process parameters as
defined by the coater. A cross-functional team shall be
used in the development of the FMEA. All special
characteristics, as defined by the coater and its
customers, shall be identified, defined, and addressed
in the FMEA.

1.4

The coater shall incorporate the use of a documented


Control Plan procedure and ensure the Control Plans
are updated to reflect current controls. The Control
Plans shall be written for each part or part family or
they may be process-specific and written for each
process. In any case, they shall address all process
steps from part receipt to part shipment and identify all
equipment used and all key coating process
parameters as defined by the coater. A crossAre finish process Control
functional team, including a production operator, shall
Plans up to date and reflecting
be used in the development of Control Plans, which
current processing?
shall be consistent with all associated documentation
such as work instructions, shop travelers, and FMEAs.
All special characteristics, as defined by the coater
and its customers, shall be identified, defined, and
addressed in the Control Plans. Sample sizes and
frequencies for evaluation of process and product
characteristics shall also be addressed consistent with
the minimum requirements listed in the Process
Tables.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Objective Evidence

N/A

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

1.5

1.6

Question

Requirements and Guidance

Are all coating related and


referenced specifications
current and available? For
example: SAE, AIAG, ASTM,
General Motors, Ford, and
Chrysler.

To ensure all customer requirements are both


understood and satisfied, the coater shall have all
related coating and customer referenced standards
and specifications available for use and a method to
ensure that they are current. Such standards and
specifications include, but are not limited to, those
relevant documents published by SAE, AIAG, ASTM,
General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler. The coater shall
have a process to ensure the timely review,
distribution, and implementation of all customer and
industry engineering standards and specifications and
changes based on customer-required schedule. This
process shall be executed as soon as possible and
shall not exceed two weeks. The coater shall
document this process of review and implementation,
and it shall address how customer and industry
documents are obtained, how they are maintained
within the coater, how the current status is established,
and how the relevant information is cascaded to the
shop floor within the two-week period. The coater shall
identify who is responsible for performing these tasks.

Is there a written process


specification for all active
processes?

The coater shall have written process specifications for


all active processes and identify all steps of the
process including relevant operating parameters.
Examples of operating parameters include process
temperatures, cycle times, load rates, rectifier settings,
etc. Such parameters shall not only be defined, they
shall have operating tolerances as defined by the
coater in order to maintain process control. All active
processes should have a written process specification.
These process specifications may take the form of
work instructions, job card, computer-based recipes, or
other similar documents.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Objective Evidence

N/A

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

Question

Requirements and Guidance

1.7

To demonstrate each process is capable of yielding


acceptable product, the coater shall perform product
capability studies for the initial validation of each
process, after relocation of any process equipment,
and after a major rebuild of any equipment. The coater
shall define what constitutes a major rebuild. Initial
product capability studies shall be conducted for all
coating processes per line as defined in scope of work
Has a valid product capability
and in accordance with customer requirements.
study been performed initially
Capability study techniques shall be appropriate for
and after process change?
the coating product characteristics, e.g., coating
thickness, corrosion resistance, etc.. Any specific
customer requirements shall be met. In the absence of
customer requirements, the coater shall establish
acceptable ranges for measures of capability. An
action plan shall exist to address the steps to be
followed in case capability indices fall outside
customer requirements or established ranges.

1.8

The analysis of products and processes over time can


yield vital information for defect prevention efforts.
The coater shall have a system to collect, analyze, and
Does the coater collect and
react to product or process data over time. Methods of
analyze data over time, and
analysis shall include ongoing trend or historical data
react to this data? Are records analysis of special product or process parameters.
available?
The coater shall determine which parameters to
include in such analysis. All process control and
testing records must be retained for a minimum of one
calendar year after the year in which they were
created.

1.9

Are internal assessments


The coater shall conduct internal assessments on an
being completed on an annual
annual basis, at a minimum, using the AIAG CSA.
basis, at a minimum,
Concerns shall be addressed in a timely manner.
incorporating AIAG CSA?

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Objective Evidence

N/A

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

Question

Requirements and Guidance

1.10

The quality management system shall include a


documented process for reprocessing that shall
include authorization from a designated individual.
The reprocessing procedure shall describe product
characteristics for which reprocessing is allowed as
Is there a system in place to well as those characteristics for which reprocessing is
authorize reprocessing and is not permissible. All reprocessing activity shall require
it documented?
a new processing control sheet issued by qualified
technical personnel denoting the necessary coating
modifications. Records shall clearly indicate when and
how any material has been reprocessed. The Quality
Manager or a designee shall authorize the release of
reprocessed product.

1.11

Does the Quality Department


review, address, and
document customer and
internal concerns?

1.12

The coater shall define a process for continual


improvement for each coating process identified in the
Is there a continual
scope of the CSA. The process shall be designed to
improvement plan applicable
bring about continual improvement in quality and
to each process defined in the
productivity. Identified actions shall be prioritized and
scope of the assessment?
shall include timing (estimated completion dates). The
coater shall show evidence of program effectiveness.

1.13

Does the Quality Manager or


designee authorize the
disposition of material from
quarantine status?

The quality management system shall include a


process for documenting, reviewing, and addressing
customer concerns and any other concerns internal to
the coater. A disciplined problem solving approach
shall be used.

The Quality Manager or designee is responsible for


authorizing and documenting appropriate personnel to
disposition quarantine material.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Objective Evidence

N/A

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

Question

Requirements and Guidance

There shall be procedures or work instructions


available to coating personnel covering the coating
process. These procedures or work instructions shall
include methods of addressing potential emergencies
(such as power failure), equipment start-up, equipment
shut-down, product segregation (See 2.8), product
inspection, and general operating procedures. These
procedures or work instructions shall be accessible to
shop floor personnel.

1.14

Are there procedures or work


instructions available to
coating personnel that define
the coating process?

1.15

The coater shall provide employee training for all


coating operations. All employees, including backup
and temporary employees, shall be trained.
Documented evidence shall be maintained showing
Is management providing
the employees trained and the evidence shall include
employee training for coating?
an assessment of the effectiveness of the training.
Management shall define the qualification
requirements for each function, and ongoing or followup training shall also be addressed.

1.16

Is there a responsibility matrix


to ensure that all key
management and supervisory
functions are performed by
qualified personnel?

The coater shall maintain a responsibility matrix


identifying all key management and supervisory
functions and the qualified personnel who may
perform such functions. It shall identify both primary
and secondary (backup) personnel for the key
functions (as defined by the coater). This matrix shall
be readily available to management at all times.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Objective Evidence

N/A

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

1.17

1.18

Question

Is there a preventive
maintenance program? Is
maintenance data being
utilized to form a predictive
maintenance program?

Requirements and Guidance

The coater shall have a documented preventive


maintenance program for key process equipment (as
identified by the coater). The program shall be a
closed-loop process that tracks maintenance efforts
from request to completion to assessment of
effectiveness. Equipment operators shall have the
opportunity to report problems, and problems shall
also be handled in a closed-loop manner. Company
data, e.g., downtime, quality rejects, first time-through
capability, recurring maintenance work orders, and
operator-reported problems, shall be used to improve
the preventive maintenance program. Maintenance
data shall be collected and analyzed as part of a
predictive maintenance program.

Has the coater developed a


The coater shall develop and maintain a critical spare
critical spare parts list, and are
parts list and shall ensure the availability of such parts
the parts available to minimize
to minimize production disruptions.
production disruptions?

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Objective Evidence

N/A

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

Question

Requirements and Guidance

Objective Evidence

N/A

Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility


Does the facility ensure that
the data entered in the
receiving system matches the
information on the customer's
shipping documents?

Documented processes and evidence of compliance


shall exist, e.g., shop travelers, work orders, etc. The
facility shall have a detailed process in place to resolve
receiving discrepancies.

2.2

Is product clearly identified


and staged throughout the
coating process?

Procedures for part and container identification help to


avoid incorrect processing or mixing of lots.
Appropriate location and staging within the facility also
help to ensure that orders are not shipped until all
required operations are performed. Customer product
shall be clearly identified and staged throughout the
coating process. Non-coated, in-process, and finished
product shall be properly segregated and identified. All
material shall be staged in a dedicated and clearly
defined area.

2.3

Is lot traceability and integrity


maintained throughout all
processes?

Out-going lot(s) shall be traceable to the incoming


lot(s). The discipline of precisely identifying lots and
linking all pertinent information to them enhances the
ability to do root cause analysis and continual
improvement.

Are procedures adequate to


prevent movement of nonconforming product into the
production system?

The control of suspect or non-conforming product is


necessary to prevent inadvertent shipment or
contamination of other lots. Procedures shall be
adequate to prevent movement of non-conforming
product into the production system. Procedures shall
exist addressing proper disposition, product
identification and tracking of material flow in and out of
hold area. Non-conforming hold area shall be clearly
designated to maintain segregation of such material.

2.1

2.4

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

2.5

2.6

2.7

Question

Requirements and Guidance

Is there a system to identify


trap points in the entire
process to reduce risk of
mixed parts (inappropriate,
unfinished or improperly
coated parts)?

The coater shall have documented procedures to


identify and monitor trap points for each
process/equipment. Monitoring of potential trap points
shall occur for every part changeover.

Are containers free of


inappropriate material?

Containers handling customer product shall be free of


inappropriate material. After emptying and before reusing containers, containers shall be inspected to
ensure that all parts and inappropriate material have
been removed. The source of inappropriate material
shall be identified and addressed. This is to ensure
that no nonconforming coated parts or inappropriate
material contaminate the finished lot.

Is part loading specified,


documented and controlled?

Loading parameters shall be specified, documented


and controlled. Examples include parts per rack and
load size.
Refer to Process Tables for frequency of checks.

2.8

Unplanned or emergency downtime greatly raises the


risk of improper processing. Operators shall be trained
in material handling, containment action, and product
Are operators trained in
segregation in the event of an equipment emergency
material handling, containment including power failure. Training shall be documented.
action and product
Work instructions specifically addressing potential
segregation in the event of an types of equipment emergencies and failures shall be
equipment emergency
accessible to and understood by equipment operators.
including power failure?
These instructions shall address containment/reaction
plans related to all elements of the process. Evidence
shall exist showing disposition and traceability of
affected product.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Objective Evidence

N/A

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

2.9

Question

Is the handling, storage and


packaging adequate to
preserve product quality?

Requirements and Guidance

The coater's loading/unloading systems, in-process


handling and shipping process shall be assessed for
risk of part damage or other quality concerns.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Objective Evidence

N/A

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

Question

Requirements and Guidance

2.10

Plant cleanliness, housekeeping, environmental, and


working conditions shall be conducive to controlling
Are plant cleanliness,
and improving quality. The coater should evaluate
housekeeping, environmental
such conditions and their effect on quality. A
and working conditions
housekeeping policy shall be clearly defined and
conducive to control and
executed. The facility shall be reviewed for the
improved quality?
following items: loose parts on floor; spillage around
tanks; overall plant lighting; fumes etc.

2.11

Are process control


parameters monitored per
frequencies specified in
Process Tables?

2.12

There are documented reaction plans to both out of


Are out of control/specification
control and out of tolerance process parameters.
parameters reviewed and
There is documented evidence that reaction plans are
reacted to?
followed.

2.13

Are In-Process / Final Test


Frequencies performed as
specified in Process Tables?

2.14

Is product test equipment


verified?

Process control parameters shall be monitored per


frequencies specified in Process Tables. Computer
monitoring equipment with alarms and alarm logs
satisfy the verification requirement. A designated floor
person shall verify the process parameters, e.g., by
initialing a strip chart or data log.

In-Process / Final Test Frequencies shall be performed


as specified in Process Tables. Refer to Process
Tables.

Test equipment shall be verified/calibrated per


applicable customer specific standard or per an
applicable consensus standard, e.g., ASTM, SAE,
ISO, NIST, etc. Verification/calibration results shall be
internally reviewed, approved and documented.
Refer to Process Tables for frequency of checks.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Objective Evidence

N/A

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question
Number

Question

Requirements and Guidance

Is lighting of inspection area


adequate?

Lighting in the inspection area must be sufficient to


allow the evaluation of all part surfaces. The lighting
shall be arranged to preclude spot lighting, glare or
shadows. There can be no moving or distracting
reflections on the surfaces to be evaluated.

2.16

Are the water rinse Control


Plans up to date and reflect
best case practices?

Identify operating parameters including:


- number of rinse tanks between process stages,
- tank type (single rinse, counter flowing, stationary
rinse, spray rinse)
- flow rate,
- water requirements (city or deionized water, reverse
osmosis),
- filtration (if applicable)
- control methods
- temperature (if applicable)

2.17

Aware of water quality and it's impact on each specific


Is the water quality adequate? process. Purified water is used where necessary, or
where specified.

2.15

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Objective Evidence

N/A

Satisfactory

Not Satisfactory

Needs Immediate
Action

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review


Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Question #

Job Audit Question

Related
CSA Question #

Customer or Internal
Requirement

Job (Shop) Order or Reference


Documentation Requirement

3.1

Is contract review and advanced quality


planning, FMEA, Control Plans, etc.,
performed by qualified individuals?

1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.6

N/A

3.2

Does the coater have the proper customer


specifications for the part?

1.5

N/A

3.3

Is a shop traveler created to meet


customer requirements?

1.6
2.1

3.4

Is material identification (part numbers, lot


numbers, contract numbers, etc.)
maintained throughout the coating
process?

2.2
2.3
2.4

3.5

Is there documented evidence of


Receiving Inspection?

2.1

3.6

Are the Loading / Racking requirements


identified?

1.6
2.7
2.9

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Actual Condition
(Objective Evidence)

Pass / Fail
/ N/A

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review


Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Question #

Job Audit Question

Related
CSA Question #

3.7

Is the proper procedure or process


specification used? Refer to Process
Tables for specific parameters. List
parameters that were verified in this audit
in the spaces provided below.

1.5
1.6
2.1
2.11
2.13

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Customer or Internal
Requirement

Job (Shop) Order or Reference


Documentation Requirement

Actual Condition
(Objective Evidence)

Pass / Fail
/ N/A

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review


Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Question #

Job Audit Question

3.8

What are the product inspection


requirements?

3.8.1

Requirement: Coating Thickness


Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:

3.8.2

Requirement: Corrosion Resistance (if


applicable)
Test Method(s):
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:

3.8.3

Requirement: Hydrogen Embrittlement


Relief (if applicable)
Test Method:

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Related
CSA Question #
1.5
2.13

Customer or Internal
Requirement

Job (Shop) Order or Reference


Documentation Requirement

Actual Condition
(Objective Evidence)

Each part may have one or more requirements determined by the coating specification.
Parts must meet each requirement. List each requirement below and validate.
2.14
(Listed below are some examples)

Pass / Fail
/ N/A

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review


Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Question #

Job Audit Question


Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:

3.8.4

Requirement: Adhesion
Test Method(s):
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:

3.8.5

Requirement: Cure
Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:

3.8.6

Requirement: Torque Tension


(if applicable)
Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Related
CSA Question #

Customer or Internal
Requirement

Job (Shop) Order or Reference


Documentation Requirement

Actual Condition
(Objective Evidence)

Pass / Fail
/ N/A

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review


Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Question #

Job Audit Question


Selection of samples:

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Related
CSA Question #

Customer or Internal
Requirement

Job (Shop) Order or Reference


Documentation Requirement

Actual Condition
(Objective Evidence)

Pass / Fail
/ N/A

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review


Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Question #

Job Audit Question


Specification:

3.8.7

Requirement: Appearance (Decorative)


Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:

3.8.8

Requirement: Dimensional
(if applicable)
Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:

3.8.9

Requirement: Color and Gloss


(Decorative)
Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Related
CSA Question #

Customer or Internal
Requirement

Job (Shop) Order or Reference


Documentation Requirement

Actual Condition
(Objective Evidence)

Pass / Fail
/ N/A

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review


Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Question #
3.8.10

Job Audit Question

Related
CSA Question #

Requirement: Customer Specific


Test Method(s):
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:

Operator or Inspector Responsibilities

3.9

Were appropriate process steps signed


off?

3.10

Were all inspection steps, as documented


in the Control Plan performed?

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

1.4
1.6
2.2
2.3
2.11
1.2
1.4

Customer or Internal
Requirement

Job (Shop) Order or Reference


Documentation Requirement

Actual Condition
(Objective Evidence)

Pass / Fail
/ N/A

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review


Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Question #

Job Audit Question

Related
CSA Question #

3.11

Were steps/operations performed that


were not documented in the Control Plan?

1.2
1.4
1.6

3.12

If additional steps were performed, were


they authorized?

1.2
1.4
1.6
1.10
1.16

3.13

Does the governing specification allow


reprocessing or rework?

1.5
1.10

3.14

If the order was certified, did the


certification accurately reflect the process
performed?

2.11
2.13

3.15

Was the certification signed by an


authorized individual?

1.16

3.16

Are the parts and containers free of


inappropriate objects or contamination?

2.6

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Customer or Internal
Requirement

Job (Shop) Order or Reference


Documentation Requirement

Actual Condition
(Objective Evidence)

Pass / Fail
/ N/A

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review


Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Question #

Job Audit Question

Related
CSA Question #

Packaging Requirements
3.17

Are packaging requirements identified?

2.6
2.7
2.9

3.18

Are parts packaged to minimize mixed


parts (for example, parts packed over
height of container)?

2.6
2.7
2.9

Shipping Requirements
3.19

Were the parts properly identified?

2.3
2.9

3.20

Were the containers properly labeled?

2.3
2.9

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Customer or Internal
Requirement

Job (Shop) Order or Reference


Documentation Requirement

Actual Condition
(Objective Evidence)

Pass / Fail
/ N/A

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control
Minimum
Requirement

1.0
A1.1

A1.2

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

AQUEOUS CLEANING PROCESS (Alkaline or Acid)


1.4

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

There shall be an incoming part assessment procedure


Per Control Plan
with criteria.

Time

Automatic/Manual

Once per lot and per part change


Automatic Line: Confirm set-up at the start
of production and every process change.
Manually verify every 3 months or after
programming change or equipment
maintenance.
Manual Line: Continuously monitor time in
each stage of process.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control
Minimum
Requirement

2.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Cleaning / Descaling Solution

A2.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Pressure for spray rinse.


Agitation for immersion tanks.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

A2.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature

Automatic

Continuous monitoring by controller.


Manually verify daily.

A2.3

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

Chemical Concentration (Alkaline Cleaner) (If used)


Per chemical supplier recommendation such as:
- free alkalinity
- total alkalinity
- pH
- conductivity
- percentage of cleaner (weight/volume or
volume/volume)

Automatic/Manual

For continuous operations, once per day.


Otherwise, prior to start of each production
cycle.

A2.4

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

Chemical Concentration (Acid Cleaner) (If used)


Per chemical supplier recommendation such as:
- free acidity or concentration
- metal contamination

Automatic/Manual

For continuous operations, once per day.


Otherwise, prior to start of each production
day. (once per day for concentration, once
per month for contamination).

A2.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Impurity Content
Per chemical supplier recommendation such as:
- acid split (oil contamination)
- alkalinity ratio

Manual

Once per week*

A2.6

2.11

There is a tank maintenance schedule for cleaning


baths.

Manual

Per preventative maintenance program

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control
Minimum
Requirement

3.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Rinse(s)

A3.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Pressure for spray rinse.


Agitation or flow for immersion tanks.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

A3.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature (if controlled)

Automatic

Continuous monitoring by controller.


Manually verify once per day.

A3.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Cleanliness of last cleaner rinse


- alkalinity/pH/conductivity
- visual inspection for oil or suspended contaminants
- overflow

Manual

Once per day

A3.4

2.11

There is a dump schedule for rinses.

Manual

Per preventative maintenance schedule.

A3.5
A3.6

1.4
2.11
1.4
2.11

There is a visual inspection (e.g. water break) after


each post cleaning rinse bath (not applicable for closed Manual
barrel systems).

Once every 8 hours

Corrosion inhibitor concentration is checked. (If used)

Once every 8 hours

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Automatic/Manual

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control
Minimum
Requirement

4.0

Monitoring Frequency

Actual Condition

Minimum Requirement

Acid Pickling

A4.1

1.4
2.11
2.13

A4.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

A4.3

A4.4

Concentration

Manual

Once every 8 hours

Concentration of Fe, per coating supplier.

Manual

Once per day

1.4
2.11
2.12

Inhibitor (if used)

Manual

N/A

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

Manual

Once every 8 hours

A4.5

Rinse - See Section 3.0.

5.0

Aluminum Etching

A5.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Concentration

Manual

Once every 8 hours

A5.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Concentrations of Al, per coating supplier.

Manual

Once per day

A5.3

Rinse - See Section 3.0.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control
Minimum
Requirement

6.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Aluminum Deoxidizing

A6.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Concentration

Manual

Once every 8 hours

A6.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Concentrations of Al, per coating supplier.

Manual

Once per day

Temperature (if applicable)

Automatic

Manually measure once every 8 hours

A6.3

Rinse - See Section 3.0.

7.0

Sealing Rinse (if applicable)

A7.1

1.4
2.11
2.13

A7.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Concentration

Manual

Once every 8 hours

A7.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

Manual

Once every 8 hours

A7.4

Rinse - See Section 3.0.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE B - Pretreatment (Mechanical)


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
1.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

ABRASIVE BLAST PROCESS

B1.1

1.4

There shall be an incoming part assessment procedure


with criteria. (Parts have been pre-cleaned and are free Manual
of oil and grease contaminations).

B1.2

2.11

The following checks shall be performed during


production:

Per load

B1.3

Load Weight

Manual / Automatic

Per load

B1.4

Blasting Media Size / type

Manual

Per load

B1.5

B1.6

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

Dwell time is clearly defined.


If additional blasting is required, management approval Manual / Automatic
is needed.

Per load

Blasting force is set and maintained within control limits


Manual / Automatic
(Amperage Draw).

Per load

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Actual Condition

Observation/Comments

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE B - Pretreatment (Mechanical)


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

B1.7

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

Abrasive media level

Manual

Once every 8 hours

B1.8

1.4
2.11
2.12

Dust collector efficiency/air flow

Manual

Once every 4 hours

B1.9

1.4
2.11
2.12

Blasting media size / life:


Media size is being checked on a regular schedule to
determine effective cleaning and life for product mix.

Manual / Automatic

Once per week

B1.10

B1.11

1.4
2.11
1.4
2.11
2.13

Surface cleanliness is checked after process. Surface


cleanliness check must be conducted using a chemical Manual
("Copper Sulfate") or other qualitative method.

Once every 4 hours

Surface profile is checked after process


(if applicable).

Per load

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Manual

Actual Condition

Observation/Comments

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE C - Conversion Coatings (Phosphate, Non-phosphate, Chromate, Non-chrome)


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
1.0
C1.1

Actual Condition

Minimum Requirement

Conversion Coating
1.4

C1.2

C1.3

Monitoring Frequency

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

2.0

This audit requires the completion of either


Table A and/or B.

n/a

n/a

If the pretreatment and phosphate is not a continuous


process, there shall be a part cleanliness check
immediately before phosphate. Acceptance criteria
must be defined.

Manual

Every start of production cycle and change


of lot number and each container.

Automatic

Confirm set-up at the start of production


and every process change.
Manually verify every 3 months or after
programming change or equipment
maintenance.

Time

Conditioner (If Applicable)

C2.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Pressure/Agitation

Automatic

Once every 8 hours

C2.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Chemical Concentration

Automatic/Manual

For continuous operations, once every 8


hours. Otherwise, prior to start of each
production cycle.

C2.3

2.11

There is a dump schedule for conditioner.

Manual

Once per week

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE C - Conversion Coatings (Phosphate, Non-phosphate, Chromate, Non-chrome)


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
3.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Conversion Coating Bath

C3.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Pressure/Agitation

Automatic

Once every 8 hours

C3.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature is monitored and controlled if required by


chemical manufacturer's technical
Automatic
data sheet.

Once every 8 hours

C3.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Chemical Analysis:
- Phosphate: Free Acid, Total Acid, Iron Content, pH,
Accelerator Amount as Applicable
- Non-phosphate: Concentration, pH
- Chromate: Concentration, pH
- Non-chrome: Concentration, pH

Automatic/Manual

Once every 4 hours

C3.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Fluoride Ion Concentration (if aluminum is being


coated)

Automatic/Manual

Once every 4 hours

C3.5

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

Coating Weight/Thickness

Manual

Once every 8 hours*

C3.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Crystal/Grain Size (If applicable)

Manual

Per customer requirement

C3.7

Coverage of phosphate coating is visually inspected for


Manual
absence of voids.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Once every 8 hours

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE C - Conversion Coatings (Phosphate, Non-phosphate, Chromate, Non-chrome)


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
4.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Rinse After Phosphate

C4.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Cleanliness of last rinse


- alkalinity/pH/conductivity
- visual inspection for suspended solids
- verify water flow (1/shift)

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

C4.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Pressure/Agitation

Automatic

Once every 8 hours

C4.3

2.11

There is a dump schedule for rinses.

Manual

Once per week

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE C - Conversion Coatings (Phosphate, Non-phosphate, Chromate, Non-chrome)


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
5.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Sealing Rinse (if applicable)

C5.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Pressure/Agitation

Automatic

Once every 8 hours

C5.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Chemical Concentration

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

C5.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature is monitored and controlled if required by


chemical manufacturer's technical
Automatic
data sheet.

Once every 8 hours

C5.4

2.11

There is a dump schedule for seal.

Manual

Once per week

Automatic

Once every 8 hours

6.0
C6.1

C6.2

Dry-Off (If Applicable)


1.4
2.11
2.12
1.4
2.11

Air temperature is monitored and controlled.

There is a procedure to ensure dryness of parts prior to


Visual
subsequent coating.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Every change of lot number and each


container.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE D - Powder Coating


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
1.0
D1.1

D2.2

Minimum Requirement

Powder Paint Application


1.4
2.11

2.0
D2.1

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Parts are checked exiting dry-off oven for cleanliness


and trapped water, prior to entering powder booth.

Manual

Once every hour

Powder Booth and Equipment


1.4
2.11
2.12

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

The temperature of parts entering the coating booth is


Automatic/Manual
monitored.

Conveyor speed set point is verified. If conveyor is not


Automatic/Manual
used, time in oven is verified.

Once every 8 hours

Automatic Line: Confirm set-up at the start


of production and every process change.
Manually verify every 3 months or after
programming change or equipment
maintenance.
Manual Line: Continuously monitor time in
each stage of process.

D2.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

D2.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

The ground is checked using a 500 volt mega ohm


meter (less than 1megaohm resistance).

Manual

At start-up, every process change and


once every 8 hours.

All guns are properly assembled (e.g., electrodes and


deflectors are installed and not damaged).

Manual

Prior to the start of production and once


every 8 hours.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE D - Powder Coating


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

1.4
2.11
2.12

The voltage and the current setting of the spray gun is


Manual
defined and verified for each process and part.

At start-up, every process change and


once every 8 hours.

D2.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

For automatic systems gun settings are defined and


verified for each process and part.
- Deflector
- Gun to part distance
- Number of guns
- Spacing of guns
- Reciprocator settings

At start-up, every process change and


once every 8 hours.

D2.7

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

The air dryer output temperature and dew point need to


be measured. The filter on main compressed air line
Automatic/Manual
needs to be monitored.

Prior to start of production and once every


4 hours. With a control alarm, frequency
may be reduced to once every 8 hours.

D2.8

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

The booth temperature and humidity are checked.

Prior to start of production and once every


4 hours. With a control alarm, frequency
may be reduced to once every 8 hours.

D2.5

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Automatic

Automatic

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE D - Powder Coating


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

D2.9

1.4
2.11
2.12

D2.10

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

D2.11

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

The air balance in the powder booth is checked.

Automatic/Manual

Prior to start of production and once every


4 hours. With a control alarm, frequency
may be reduced to once every 8 hours.

Every sieve is clean and operational.

Automatic/Manual

Prior to the start of production and once


every 8 hours.

1.4
2.11
2.12

The powder flow on sieve is monitored.

Automatic/Manual

Prior to the start of production and once


every 8 hours.

D2.12

1.4
2.11
2.12

The feed hopper fluidizing air pressure is checked.

Manual

Prior to the start of production and once


every 8 hours.

D2.13

1.4
2.11
2.12

The dust vent on feed hopper is checked.

Manual

Prior to the start of production and once


every 8 hours.

D2.14

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

The reclaim sieve is operating properly.

Manual

Prior to the start of production and once


every 8 hours.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE D - Powder Coating


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

D2.15

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

D2.16

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

The venturis (orifice or block) in the feed pumps and


the pick up tubes in the hopper are checked.

Manual

Prior to the start of production and once


every 8 hours.

1.4
2.11
2.12

The feed hoses are checked to ensure that they have


no excessive bends and kinks.

Manual

Prior to the start of production and once


every 8 hours.

D2.17

1.4
2.11
2.12

The virgin to reclaim powder ratio is defined for each


part and/or process. Verified by feed pressures, weight Manual
or volume.

Once every 8 hours

D2.18

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

The pressure differential across the filters in the booth


Automatic
collection chamber is monitored.

Prior to the start of production and once


every 8 hours.

D2.19

1.4
2.11
2.12

Sealing Rinse (if applicable)

Prior to the start of production and once


every 8 hours.

3.0

Cure (See Cure Process Table I)

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Manual

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
1.0

E1.1

Monitoring Frequency

Actual Condition

Minimum Requirement

Part Appearance
1.4
2.11

Pretreated parts are visually inspected for


cleanliness and/or uniform phosphate coating or
paint layer (when applicable). This must be
performed between each coating layer.

Manual

Once every 4 hours

E1.2

1.4
2.9

Mutilation prevention items (i.e., gloves, belt buckle


Manual
covers, watch covers, etc.) are in place.

Ongoing

E1.3

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

Paint racks and/or fixtures are visually inspected for


cleanliness, excessive paint build-up, bent hooks,
Manual
etc.

Each time parts are racked/loaded.

E1.4

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

There is a paint rack/fixture maintenance program.


Manual
Program must define rack/fixture cleaning intervals.

Per preventative maintenance schedule.

Surface profile is within specifications


(if applicable).

Manual

Once every 4 hours

Surface tension is within specifications


(if applicable).

Manual

Once every 4 hours

1.4
2.11
2.13

E1.5

1.4
E1.6

2.11
2.13

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
2.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Paint Mixing

E2.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Paint mixing rooms are controlled (mixing tank


grounding, closed container, properly enclosed
space, temperature, clean environment).

E2.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

There is a stock rotation system (FIFO) in place and


being utilized to ensure that older material is used
Manual
first.

Continuous

E2.3

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

Paint agitation/time and reduction (solvent package)


Manual
are proper and documented.

Once every 8 hours

E2.4

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

Viscosity is verified to be within operational limits


and documented.

Prior to start of production and every


process change and/or addition. For
continuous operations check once every 8
hours.

E2.5

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

Temperature is verified to be within operational limits


Automatic/Manual
and documented.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Automatic/Manual

Manual

Once every 8 hours

Prior to start of production and every


process change and/or addition. For
continuous operations check once every 8
hours.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

E2.6

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

The proper filter size and type are in place.

E2.7

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

Pump pressures are set and pressure readings are


verified and documented to be within operational
Manual
limits.

Prior to start of production, every process


change and once every 8 hours.

E2.8

1.4
2.11
2.12

Circulation (flow meter, pressure gage) is monitored


Automatic/Manual
and documented.

Prior to start of production, every process


change and once every 8 hours.

E2.9

1.4
2.11
2.12

Filters are in use (not by-passed) and pressures


monitored. Filters are changed before pressure
differential exceeds 10 PSI.
(70 kPa)

Prior to start of production, every process


change and once every 8 hours.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Manual

Automatic/Manual

Prior to start of production and every


process change.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
3.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Primer/Promoter

E3.1

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

E3.2

Destaticizing air is operational. (Plastic parts only).

Automatic

Prior to start of production, every process


change and once every 8 hours.

1.4
2.11
2.12

Booth balance (air flow) is monitored and


documented.

Manual

Prior to start of production, every process


change and once every 8 hours.

E3.3

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

Booth temperature and humidity are monitored and


Automatic/Manual
documented.

Prior to start of production, every process


change and once every 4 hours.

E3.4

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

Atomizer parameters (fluid flow, air pressures


(atomizing fan, shaping), electrostatics and mixing)
are set within operational limits.

Prior to start of production and every


process change. For continuous
operations once per day.

Automatic/Manual

For manual process, prior to start of


production and every process change.
E3.5

1.4
1.6

Time is verified and documented if applicable.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Automatic/Manual

For automated process, verify once per


month, or after every program change or
major maintenance.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
4.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Basecoat (If applicable)

E4.1

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.13

E4.2

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

Booth temperature and humidity are monitored and


Automatic/Manual
documented.

Prior to start of production, every process


change and once every 4 hours.

E4.3

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

Atomizer parameters (fluid flow, air pressures


(atomizing fan, shaping), electrostatics and mixing)
are set within operational limits.

Prior to start of production and every


process change. For continuous
operations once per day.

Flashtimes between coats are set at suppliers


recommended times.

Automatic/Manual

Automatic/Manual

At the start of production and every


process change.

For manual process, prior to start of


production and every process change.
E4.4

1.4
1.6

Time is verified and documented if applicable.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Automatic/Manual

For automated process, verify 1 per


month, or after every program change or
major maintenance.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Basecoat Heated Flash


(Waterborne Materials Only)

5.0

E5.1

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

Oven set point(s) and energy type


(Convection/IR/UV/etc.), are verified to be within
chemical suppliers recommended limits and
documented.

Manual

Prior to start of production and every


process change. For continuous
operations once every 8 hours.

E5.2

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

Oven temperature is monitored and recorded.

Automatic

Prior to start of production and every two


hours. With a temperature control alarm,
frequency may be reduced to once every 8
hours.

E5.3

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

For each coating in use, proper cure or drying time


parameters are verified based upon product
technical data sheet.

Manual

Every three months and after oven


modification or repair.

E5.4

1.17

Air filter (if used) change is scheduled.

Manual

Per preventative maintenance schedule.

E5.5

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.13

Percent solids after pre-dry is at the suppliers


recommended percentage.

Manual

Once every 8 hours

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
6.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Clear coat

E6.1

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.13

E6.2

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

Booth temperature and humidity are monitored and


Automatic/Manual
documented.

Prior to start of production, every process


change and once every 4 hours.

E6.3

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

Atomizer parameters (fluid flow, air pressures


(atomizing fan, shaping), electrostatics and mixing)
are set within operational limits.

Prior to start of production and every


process change. For continuous
operations once per day.

Flashtimes between coats are set at suppliers


recommended times.

Automatic/Manual

Automatic/Manual

At the start of production and every


process change.

For manual process, prior to start of


production and every process change.
E6.4

7.0

1.4
1.6

Time is verified and documented if applicable.

Cure (See Cure Process Table I)

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Automatic/Manual

For automated process, verify 1 per


month, or after every program change or
major maintenance.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE F - Electrocoat


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
1.0
F1.1

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Pre-Electrocoat Paint Application Part Appearance


1.4
2.11

2.0

Pretreated parts are visually inspected for cleanliness and/or


uniform phosphate coating (when phosphate is used).

Manual

Once every 8 hours

Bath parameters (pH, conductivity, solid content, temperature,


voltage) are checked and adjusted.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

Electrocoat Tank

F2.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

F2.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Oil contamination (Panel inspection for pin holes).


Oil bags must be available.

Manual

Once per month and if any visual defects


are observed.

F2.3

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

Cycle time/Line speed setup is checked.

Automatic/Manual

For manual process, prior to start of


production and every part change. For
automated process, at the start of
production and every process change.

F2.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Is bath circulation monitored.


(Flow meter, pressure gage)

Automatic/Manual

Once every 4 hours. With a control alarm,


frequency may be reduced to once every 8
hours.

F2.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Bag filters are in use (not by-passed) and pressures monitored.


Filter bags changed before pressure differential exceeds 10
Manual
PSI. (70 kPa)
Filter mesh size must be 25 m maximum.

Once every 8 hours

F2.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Flow over the weir is verified.

Manual

Once every 8 hours

F2.7

1.4
2.11
2.12

Bath is checked for microbial contamination.

Manual

Once every month*

F2.8

1.4
2.11
2.12

Incoming DI / RO water is checked for cleanliness. (Conductivity


Automatic/Manual
<10 S/mhos )

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Once every 8 hours

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE F - Electrocoat


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

F2.9

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

Paint racks and/or barrels are visually inspected for cleanliness,


Manual
excessive paint build-up, bent hooks, etc.

Each time parts are racked/loaded

F2.10

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

There is a paint rack/barrel maintenance program. Program


must define rack/barrel cleaning intervals.

Manual

Per preventative maintenance schedule.

F2.11

1.4
2.11
2.12

Saddle contact cleanliness (if applicable).

Manual

Once every 8 hours

F2.12

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

There is a tank cleaning and maintenance schedule.

Manual

Once every year

F2.13

1.4
2.11
2.12

Confirmation of ash content (pigment to binder ratio).

Manual

Once per month

F2.14

1.4
2.11
2.12

Analysis of accumulation of metallic impurities.

Manual

Once every 6 months

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE F - Electrocoat


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
3.0

Monitoring Frequency

Actual Condition

Minimum Requirement

Sealing Rinse (if applicable)

F3.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

The conductivity of the anolyte solution has been measured.

Manual

Once every 8 hours

F3.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

The pH of the anolyte solution has been measured.

Manual

Once every 8 hours

F3.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Oil contamination (Panel inspection for pin holes).


Oil bags must be available.

Manual

Once every month

F3.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

The anolyte solution is being circulated to each cell.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

F3.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Dump and clean schedule for anolyte is being maintained.

Manual

Per preventative maintenance schedule.

F3.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Amperage draw has been checked on anodes.

Automatic/Manual

Per preventative maintenance schedule.

4.0

Rectifier

F4.1

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

The proper voltage is being used for the load size.


(Electronically Controlled with digital read-out)

Manual

When each bar or rack enters the coating


tank.

F4.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

The ramp up time to full voltage has been verified.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 6 months or after any change


or maintenance of rectifier.

F4.3

2.10

There is a visual indicator to alert personnel when system is


energized.

Automatic

Ongoing

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE F - Electrocoat


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

F4.4

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

The ripple of the rectifier has been checked by an approved


electrician.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Automatic/Manual

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Once per year or after any change or


maintenance of rectifier.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE F - Electrocoat


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
5.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Rinse System

F5.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Immersion rinse tanks are operating at the proper levels and


tanks are being agitated correctly.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

F5.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

There is sufficient permeate supplied to the rinse.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

F5.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

The pH and conductivity of the DI rinse water are measured. (If


Manual
part of production process).

F5.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

F5.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Bag filters are in use (not by-passed) and pressures monitored.


Filter bags changed before pressure differential exceeds 10
Manual
PSI. (70 kPa)
Filter mesh size must be 25 m maximum.

Once every 8 hours

F5.6

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

Rinse tanks and related equipment are emptied, inspected and


Manual
cleaned.

Per preventative maintenance schedule.

6.0

Ultra filters are in use (not by-passed) and pressures monitored.

Cure (See Cure Process Table I)

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

Once every 8 hours

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip/Spin


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
1.0

G1.3

G1.4

2.9
1.4
2.11
1.4
2.11
1.17
2.6
2.9

G1.5

G1.6

G1.7

Actual Condition

Minimum Requirement

Coating Material Application

G1.1

G1.2

Monitoring Frequency

2.9

1.4

Final pretreatment and/or phosphating shall be


completed in the same building.

Yes/No

Ongoing

After pretreatment, parts are inspected for flash rust,


wetness, oil or other defects.

Manual

Every lot

Pretreated parts are visually inspected for cleanliness


and/or uniform phosphate coating (when phosphate is Automatic/Manual
used).

Once every 8 hours

Containers used to hold parts between coating


operations are free of oil, grease or other
contaminants.

Yes/No

Ongoing

Parts shall be stored indoors in a staging area that


does not affect the quality of parts. The staging area
shall not be adjacent to open doorways or windows
exposing parts to water, dirt, and other
contaminations.

Yes/No

Ongoing

2.11

Parts shall be coated within the time limit specified by


Per application manual
the chemical supplier application manual.

Ongoing

2.11

Prior to loading into coating machines, parts are


inspected for flash rust, wetness, oil or other defects.

Every lot

1.4

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Manual

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip/Spin


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
2.0

Monitoring Frequency

Actual Condition

Minimum Requirement

Coating Bath

G2.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Incoming paint viscosity is checked.

Manual

Each new lot of paint

G2.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Incoming solids checks are performed.

Manual

Each new lot of paint

G2.3

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

Appropriate mixing equipment is used, capable of


dispersing settled solids.

Manual

Ongoing

Coating material (paint) must be stored per chemical


supplier requirements.

Manual

Ongoing

When not in use, coating material (paint) is kept


covered and/or sealed per chemical supplier
requirements.

Manual

Ongoing

Paint storage area is clean and organized so each


paint is easily found and to prevent contamination.

Manual

Ongoing

Paint filtration procedures are in place.

Preventive maintenance
schedule

Ongoing

Automatic/Manual

Prior to start of production and once every 3


hours.

G2.4

G2.5

G2.6

G2.7

2.9
2.10

2.9
2.10

2.9
2.10

2.9
2.10

The following checks shall be performed during


production:

G2.8

G2.9

1.4
2.11
2.12

Paint Temperature

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip/Spin


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

Monitoring Frequency

Actual Condition

Minimum Requirement

G2.10

1.4
2.11
2.12

Viscosity

Manual

Prior to start of production and once every 3


hours.

G2.11

1.4
2.11
2.12

Basecoat % Solids (by weight).

Manual

Prior to start of production and every process


change and/or addition. For continuous
operations once per day.

G2.12

1.4
2.11
2.12

Volume (paint depth in coating vat).

Automatic/Manual

Prior to start of production and once every 3


hours.

G2.13

1.4
2.11
2.12

Equipment surfaces in contact with wet coating (ex.


Vibratory feed tables) are free of loose debris and
excess coating build-up.

Manual

Once per day

G2.14

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

Basket condition (basket mesh clean and


undamaged).

Manual

Once per day

G2.15

1.4
2.11
2.12

Paint and/or viscosity reducing agent additions are


documented and the viscosity verified before
production continues.

Manual

Each addition

G2.16

2.10

Viscosity cups are cleaned after each use.

Manual

Ongoing

G2.17

2.14
1.17

Viscosity cups are verified against calibrated


standards or master cup.

Manual

Twice per month

G2.18

2.14
1.17

Thermometers are verified against calibrated


standards.

Manual

Once per month

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip/Spin


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
3.0
G3.1

G3.2

G3.3

G3.4

Monitoring Frequency

Actual Condition

Minimum Requirement

Application Parameters
1.4
1.6
1.4
1.6
1.4
1.6

1.4
1.6
1.17

A system is in place to ensure proper basket weights


for specific parts, such as processing manual, traveler, Automatic/Manual
or process recipe.

Every lot

Baskets are kept less than 2/3 full by volume.

Automatic/Manual

Every lot

Coating parameters are controlled and verified via


external display (dip time, spin speed, spin time, spin
cycle, spin direction and tumbling).

Automatic/Manual

Every lot

There is a system (raking, vibe table, etc.) to uniformly


distribute parts prior to curing to ensure proper cure
Automatic/Manual
and prevent parts from sticking and minimize touch
marks.

Every lot

G3.5

2.10

Vibratory feed tables are cleaned (if used).

Manual

As needed

G3.6

2.9

There is evidence of steps taken to assist in soft


handling of parts (shallow drops, lined chutes and
hoppers, bumper boards, etc.).

Automatic/Manual

Every lot

Parts are cool to touch before each coating step.

Manual

Every lot

G3.7

1.4
2.9
2.11

4.0

Cure (See Cure Process Table I)

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE H - Autodeposition


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
1.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Coating Bath

H1.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

H1.2

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

H1.3

Mixer speed and direction are monitored and


adjusted.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

Temperature of the coating bath is continuously


monitored and controlled.

Automatic

Continuous monitoring by controller and


manually verified once per day.

1.4
2.11
2.12

Misting nozzles in the vicinity of the coating bath


are operational.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

H1.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Acid (e.g., 101 meter) and oxidation/reduction


potential (ORP) levels are checked.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 2 hours

H1.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Chemical concentration (% solids, starter/iron


Automatic/Manual
titration, conductivity) is checked and maintained.

Once every 8 hours

H1.6

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

Coating tank, mixers and heating/cooling system


are inspected and maintained.

Once every 12 months

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Manual

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE H - Autodeposition


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
2.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Tap Rinse After Coating

H2.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Pump pressure or agitator speed is monitored.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

H2.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Impurity concentration (conductivity) is checked.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

3.0

Reaction Rinse

H3.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Chemical concentration is checked and


maintained.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

H3.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Pump pressure or agitator speed is monitored.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

H3.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature is monitored and controlled if


required by chemical manufacturer's technical
data sheet.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

H3.4

1.4
1.17
2.11
2.12

There is a dump schedule.

Manual

Per Chemical Manufacturer's


recommendation and production volume.

4.0

Cure (See Cure Process Table I)

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment


Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE I - Cure


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

1.0

I1.1

Oven conditions are monitored and recorded continuously by a


data recorder.
Convective - Temperature
Gas IR - Gas flow
Electric IR - Power (wattage)

Automatic

Prior to start of production and once every


2 hours. With a control alarm, frequency
may be reduced to once every 8 hours.

I1.2

Oven and part temperature profile is verified. The verification


shall be performed under production load conditions and with
thermocouples located to cover all areas of the part curing
window.

Manual

Once every 3 months and after oven


modification or repair.

I1.3

1.4
1.6
2.11
2.12

For each coating in use, proper cure or drying time parameters


are verified based upon oven temperature profile and product
technical data sheet.

Manual

Once every 3 months and after oven


modification or repair.

I1.4

1.4
1.6
1.17
2.11
2.12

Conveyor speed set point is verified. If conveyor is not used,


time in oven is verified.

Automatic/Manual

For manual process, prior to start of


production and every part change. For
automated process, at the start of
production and every process change.

Air filter (if used) change is scheduled.

Manual

Per oven manufacturer, filter supplier


recommendation.

I1.5
I1.6

2.13

Cure testing is performed per part specification on a production


Manual
part.

At oven start-up, every process change


and once every 8 hours.

I1.7

2.13

Coating adhesion test is performed per part specification on a


production part.

Manual

At oven start-up, every process change


and once every 8 hours.

I1.8

2.13

Appearance requirements checks (color, gloss etc.) are


performed per part specification.

Manual

At oven start-up, every process change


and once every 8 hours.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
1.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Cleaning (Alkaline or Acid)

J1.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature

Automatic

Continuous monitoring by controller.


Manually verify daily.

J1.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Cleaner Concentration

Manual

Once per day *

J1.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Soil loading ( i.e., acid split, alkalinity ratio)

Manual

Once per day *

J1.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Time

J1.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Agitation (Consistent Across tank)

Automatic

Once every 8 hours

J1.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

Automatic or Manual

Once every 8 hours

J1.7

1.4
2.11
2.12

Skimmer Weir Level/oil separator function

Automatic or Manual

Once every 8 hours

For manual process, prior to start of


production and every process change. *
Automatic or Manual
For automated process, verify after every
program change or major maintenance.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

J1.8

1.4
2.11
2.12

Oil on top of tank

Manual

Once every 8 hours

J1.9

1.4
2.11
2.12

Debris in bottom of tank

Manual

Once every 8 hours

J1.10

1.4
2.11
2.12

Metal Contamination (as applicable)

Manual

Once every 8 hours

Automatic or Manual

Once every 8 hours

2.0

Rinsing

J2.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

J2.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Contamination accumulation/build up on side


Manual Visual
of tanks

Once per week *

J2.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

There is a process for control of biological


contamination

Manual

Once per week *

J2.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Pressure for spray rinse.


Agitation or flow for immersion tanks.

Automatic/Manual

Once every 8 hours

J2.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature (if controlled)

Automatic

Continuous monitoring by controller.


Manually verify daily.

J2.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

For manual process, prior to start of


production and every process change.
Time

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Automatic or Manual
For automated process, verify after every
program change or major maintenance.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

J2.7

1.4
2.11
2.12

J2.8

2.11

3.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Cleanliness of last rinse


- alkalinity/pH/conductivity
- visual inspection for oil or suspended
contaminants
- overflow
- debris in bottom of tank

Manual

Once per day

There is a dump schedule for rinses.

Manual

Per preventative maintenance schedule.

Deoxidizer / Desmutter

J3.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature (if applicable)

Automatic or Manual

Continuous monitoring by controller.


Manually verify daily.

J3.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Concentration

Manual

Once per day *

J3.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Acidity Ratio (Total Acid/ Free Acid = Ratio)

Manual

Once per day *

J3.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Time

J3.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Agitation (Consistent Across tank)

Automatic

Once every 8 hours

J3.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

Automatic or Manual

Once every 8 hours

J3.7

1.4
2.11
2.12

Debris in bottom of tank

Manual

Once per day

For manual process, prior to start of


production and every process change. *
Automatic or Manual
For automated process, verify after every
program change or major maintenance.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
4.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Chemical Etch / Strip (alkaline or acid)

J4.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature (if applicable)

Automatic or Manual

Continuous monitoring by controller.


Manually verify daily.

J4.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Concentration

Manual

Once per day *

J4.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Contamination:
For alkaline: aluminum content

Manual

Once per day *

J4.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Contamination accumulation/build up on side


Manual
of tanks

Once per week

J4.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

For acid etches only:


Ratio (Total Acid/ Free Acid = Ratio)
For acid: fluoride content

Manual

Once per day *

J4.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Time

Automatic or Manual

J4.7

1.4
2.11
2.12

Agitation (Consistent Across tank)

Automatic

Once every 8 hours

J4.8

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

Automatic or Manual

Once every 8 hours

J4.9

1.4
2.11
2.12

Debris in bottom of tank

Manual

Once per day

For manual process: every load.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

For automated process, verify after every


process change or major maintenance.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
5.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Bright Dip

J5.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature

Automatic or Manual

Continuous monitoring by controller with


low temperature alarm. Manually verify
prior to start of production and once every
4 hours.

J5.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Acid concentration

Manual

Once every 4 hours

J5.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Specific gravity

Manual

Once every 4 hours

J5.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Contamination: aluminum content

Manual

Once per week

J5.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Contamination accumulation, suspended


solids

Manual

Once per day

J5.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Time

Automatic or Manual

J5.7

1.4
2.11
2.12

Agitation (Consistent Across tank)

Automatic

Once every 8 hours

J5.8

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

Automatic or Manual

Once every 4 hours

For manual process: every load.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

For automated process, verify after every


process change or major maintenance.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
6.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Bright Dip Rinse

J6.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Acid concentration or specific gravity

Manual

Once every 8 hours

J6.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Time

Automatic or Manual

Once every 8 hours

J6.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Agitation (Consistent Across Tank)

Manual

Once every 8 hours

J6.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

Automatic or Manual

Once every 8 hours

J6.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Debris in bottom of tank

Manual

Once per week

J6.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature

Automatic or Manual

Once per day

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
7.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Anodizing

J7.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature

Automatic

Continuous monitoring by controller.


Manually verify daily.

J7.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Acid Concentration

Manual

Once every 8 hours *

J7.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Concentration of additives (fume


suppressant, hard coat additives, high
temperature additives)

Manual

Once per week

J7.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Aluminum Content (maximum 20 g/L)

Manual

Once per week

J7.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Time

Automatic or Manual

For manual process: every load.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

For automated process, verify after every


process change or major maintenance.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

J7.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Agitation (Consistent Across tank)

Manual

Once every 8 hours

J7.7

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

Automatic or Manual

Once every 8 hours

J7.8

1.4
2.11
2.12

Debris in bottom of tank

Manual

Once per week

J7.9

1.4
2.11
2.12

Voltage or Amperage with Gradual Ramp Up


Automatic or Manual
(Current Increase)

J7.10

1.4
2.11
2.12

Saddle Contact Cleanliness

For manual process: every load.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Manual

For automated process, verify after every


process change and major maintenance.

Once every 8 hours

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
8.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Dye

J8.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature

Automatic

Continuous monitoring by controller.


Manually verify daily.

J8.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Concentration

Manual

Once per day *

J8.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

pH

Manual

Once every 8 hours *

J8.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Time

Automatic or Manual

J8.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Agitation (as applicable)

Automatic

Once every 8 hours

J8.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

Automatic or Manual

Once every 8 hours

J8.7

1.4
2.11
2.12

Debris in bottom of tank

Manual

Once every 8 hours

J8.8

1.4
2.11
2.12

There is a process for control of biological


contamination.

Manual

Once per week *

For manual process: every load.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

For automated process, verify after every


process change or major maintenance.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
9.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Pre-Seal (If applicable)

J9.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature (if applicable)

Automatic or Manual

Continuous monitoring by controller.


Manually verify daily.

J9.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Concentration

Manual

Once per week *

J9.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

pH

Manual

Once every 4 hours *

J9.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

Time

Automatic or Manual

J9.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Agitation (as applicable)

Automatic

Once every 8 hours

J9.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

Automatic or Manual

Once every 8 hours

J9.7

1.4
2.11
2.12

Debris in bottom of tank

Manual

Once every 8 hours

For manual process: every load.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

For automated process, verify after every


process change or major maintenance.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Type of Control

Minimum Requirement
10.0

Actual Condition

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

Seal (if Applicable)


For manual process: every load.

J10.1

1.4
2.11
2.12

Time

Automatic or Manual

J10.2

1.4
2.11
2.12

Temperature

Automatic or Manual

Continuous monitoring by controller.


Manually verify every 4 hours if controlled.

J10.3

1.4
2.11
2.12

Concentration

Manual

Once every 8 hours *

J10.4

1.4
2.11
2.12

pH

Manual

Once every 4 hours *

J10.5

1.4
2.11
2.12

Contamination (per chemical vendor


recommendation)

Manual

Once per week *

J10.6

1.4
2.11
2.12

Agitation (as applicable)

Manual

Once every 8 hours

J10.7

1.4
2.11
2.12

Solution Level

Automatic or Manual

Once every 8 hours

J10.8

1.4
2.11
2.12

Debris in bottom of tank

Manual

Once every 8 hours

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

For automated process, verify after every


process change or major maintenance.

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE K - EQUIPMENT


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.
* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

K1.1

2.14

pH / Conductivity Meter

K1.2

2.14

pH / Conductivity Probe
Solution compatible probes must
be used.

K1.3

2.14

Temperature Controller

Equipment Type

Pretreatment/
Aqueous
Cleaning

Powder
Coat

E-Coat

Spray

Dip/Spin

A-Coat

Cure

Anodize

Verification Frequency

Calibration /
Certification
Frequency *

Daily

Once per year

Before each use

N/A

Every 3 months

N/A

Ripple Checked every 12


months

N/A

PROCESS EQUIPMENT
X

K1.4

2.14

Rectifier

K1.5

2.14

Amp Meter/Volt Meter

Checked every 12 months

N/A

K1.6

2.14

Wet Analysis:
Before use, chemicals must be
checked for shelf life and/or
expiration date

Daily

N/A

K1.7

2.14

Filters

Per process table

N/A

K1.8

2.14

Laboratory Balance (Weight


Scale)

Once per month

N/A

K1.9

2.14

Conductivity Meter

Once per month

N/A

K1.10

2.14

Viscosity cup

K1.11
K1.12

2.14

Twice per month

N/A

N/A

Once every 6 months

N/A

Once per year

Thermocouple

Lab Oven Controller

Daily per ASTM B117

N/A

Daily

N/A
N/A

MINIMUM REQUIRED TESTING CAPABILITY


K2.1

2.14

Salt Spray Cabinet

K2.2

2.14

Water Immersion bath

K2.3

2.14

Cure Testing

Per Part

K2.4

2.14

Adhesion Testing

Per Part

N/A

K2.5

2.14

Thickness Testing

Per Part

Once per year

K2.6

2.14

Solids Testing

Daily

N/A

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Included in Preventative
Maintenance Plan

Comment

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE L - Part Inspection and Testing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to specifications or other
requirements.
Note that not all tests are applicable to all coatings.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement
1.0
L1.1

1.4

Procedures are in place to prevent damage to the finish or part


during the inspection and packaging processes.

System in place

L1.2

Appearance of the coating shall be verified per specification and


Ongoing
applications manual.

L1.3

Initial adhesion
(Tape, bend, impact)

At the start of production and once every


8 hours.

L1.4

Intercoat / final adhesion

Per customer specification

L1.5

Color and Gloss (If applicable)

At the start of production and once every


8 hours.

L1.6

Film thickness / coating weight

At the start of production, every part family


change and every process change. Once
every 8 hours.

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

CQI-12

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE L - Part Inspection and Testing


All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.
The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to specifications or other
requirements.
Note that not all tests are applicable to all coatings.

Item #

Related
CSA
Question #

Category/Process Steps

Monitoring Frequency

Minimum Requirement

L1.7

Corrosion resistance:
- Neutral salt spray
- Humidity
- Water immersion

Once per week per line per coating


process being used.
If the same coating system is used for
multiple customers with different
requirements, test to the highest
requirement.

L1.8

Torque tension/Coefficient of Friction

Once per week per line per coating


process being used.

L1.9

Dimensional check (e.g., Go-no go, Plug and Ring gage)

Per customer specification

L1.10

Hydrogen Embrittlement

Per customer specification

L1.11

Cyclical Corrosion Testing

Per customer specification

2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

Observation/Comments

Actual Condition

(Pass / Fail / N/A)

Anda mungkin juga menyukai