doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12281
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Basic Medicine, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rare and
Uncommon Diseases, 18877 Jingshi Road, Jinan 250062 and 2Jinan Infectious Disease Hospital, 22029 Jingshi Road, Jinan 250021,
China
ABSTRACT
Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71), one of the most important causative agents of hand, foot and mouth
disease (HFMD) in children, can lead to severe clinical outcomes, even death. However, the infection
spectrum of EV-A71 in different cell lines remains unknown. Therefore, in this study, the biological
characteristics of EV-A71 Subgroup C4 in different cell lines were investigated. To this end, the
infectivity of EV-A71Jinan1002 isolated from children with severe HFMD was assessed in 18 different
host cell lines. It was found that the MA104 cell line displayed biological characteristics suitable for
EV-A71 Subgroup C4 strain isolation and proliferation; indeed, it was found that a broad spectrum of
cell lines can be infected by EV-A71Jinan1002. Among the screened cells, four cell lines (HEK293, RD,
MA104 and Marc145) produced high 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) values calculated in
viral proliferations (ranged from 107.6 to 107.8); the TCID50 being negatively associated with the time
to appearance of CPE. Proliferation curves demonstrated that EV-A71Jinan1002 amplies more
efciently in MA104, Hep-2 and RD cells. Remarkably, the virus isolation rate was much higher in
MA104 cells than in RD cells. Thus this study, to our knowledge, is for the rst to explore the infection
spectrum of EV-A71 subgroup C4 in such a large number of different cell lines. Our data provide
useful reference data for facilitating further study of EV-A71.
Key words
Correspondence
Lizeng Qin, Director, Department of Microbiology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rare and Uncommon Diseases, 18877
Jingshi Road, Jinan 250062, China. Tel: 86 0531 82919701; fax: 86 0531 82919930; email: lizeng_qin@163.com.
Received 31 March 2015; revised 9 June 2015; accepted 28 June 2015.
List of Abbreviations: CPE, cytopathic effect; CT, threshold cycle value; EV-A71, enterovirus A71; HFMD, hand, foot and mouth disease;
SCARB2, scavenger receptor class B, member 2; TCID50, 50% tissue culture infective dose.
477
L. Qin et al.
RESULTS
EV-A71 isolation rate is higher in MA104
than in RD cells
Firstly, the rates of isolation of EV-A71 from RD and
MA104 cells were compared, using 38 fecal specimens
obtained from patients infected with EV-A71. The virus
isolation rate from MA104 cells was 63.2% (24/38),
whereas for RD cells it was only 36.8% (14/38), which
is signicantly lower than for MA104 cells (P < 0.05,
x2 test).
EV-A71Jinan1002 can be grown in a broad
spectrum of cell lines
Having demonstrated the difference between MA104 and
RD cell lines in virus isolation, we were intrigued to
determine the size of the host cell infection spectrum.
First, experiments to screen the 18 host cell lines for their
suitability for EV-A71Jinan1002 strain infection were
performed. It was found that, EV-A71Jinan1002 did not
infect cell lines derived from lower species of animals,
such as cattle (MDBK, P3), dogs (MDCK), swine (ST,
PK15) and mice (Hepa1-6), but did infect all cell lines
derived either from humans or monkeys (Table 1). To
conrm infections of all cells used in this study, 5 days
after EV-A71Jinan1002 inoculation, total RNAs were
extracted and RT-PCR performed. Of the 18 cell lines
investigated, 12 did have the EV-A71 genome, conrming
infection with EV-A71Jinan1002. CPE was evidenced
2015 The Societies and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
Origin
Cell line
logTCID50
x Sd
Human
RD
HEK293
Hep-2
SGC-7901
Caco-2
MCF-7
A549
SMMC-7721
HEL
HeLa
Marc145
MA104
Hepa1-6
MDBK
P3
ST
PK15
MDCK
7.7 0.3
7.8 0.4
5.5 0.2
5.6 0.1
3.3 0.1
4.7 0.2
3.3 0.1
3.8 0.1
6.3 0.2
3.4 0.1
7.6 0.3
7.8 0.3
17.3
20
25.3
25.3
41.3
26.7
37.3
46.7
21.3
18.7
17.3
16
Monkey
Mouse
Bovine
Porcine
Canine
Note: The times shown for appearance of CPE are the average from
three sets of observations.
479
L. Qin et al.
DISCUSSION
EV-A71, which is among the most common viruses that
are very specic for humans, only infects humans,
especially children under 5 years old. However, many
animals, such as Rhesus monkeys, suckling mice, young
gerbils, and infant Tupaia belangeri Chinese have
reportedly been infected with this virus in different
laboratories (2022). In our experience, the search for
perfect cell lines to further study EV-A71 infection in
vitro is ongoing. In this study, we demonstrated that
MA104 is suitable for EV-A71 proliferation. We
investigated a broad spectrum of 18 cell lines of human,
non-human primate or small animal origin for EV-A71
480
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
DISCLOSURE
The authors declare that they have no competing
interests.
481
L. Qin et al.
REFERENCES
1. McMinn P.C. (2002) An overview of the evolution of
enterovirus 71 and its clinical and public health signicance.
FEMS Microbiol Rev 26: 91107.
2. Wang S.M., Lei H.Y., Huang K.J., Wu J.M., Wang J.R., Yu C.K.,
Su I.J., Liu C.C. (2003) Pathogenesis of enterovirus 71 brainstem
encephalitis in pediatric patients: roles of cytokines and cellular
immune activation in patients with pulmonary edema. J Infect
Dis 188: 56470.
3. Chan K.P., Goh K.T., Chong C.Y., Teo E.S., Lau G., Ling A.E.
(2003) Epidemic hand, foot and mouth disease caused by
human enterovirus 71, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis 9: 7885.
4. Wang J.R., Tuan Y.C., Tsai H.P., Yan J.J., Liu C.C., Su I.J.
(2002) Change of major genotype of enterovirus 71 in outbreaks
of hand-foot-and-mouth disease in Taiwan between 1998 and
2000. J Clin Microbiol 40: 1015.
5. Jiang B., Zhang J., You X., Dong C., Cheng X., Dai X., Meng J.
(2012) Diagnosis of hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by
EV71 and other enteroviruses by a one-step, single tube, duplex
RT-PCR. J Med Virol 84: 18038.
6. Nie K., Qi S.X., Zhang Y., Luo L., Xie Y., Yang M.J., Zhang Y.,
Li J., Shen H., Li Q., Ma X.J. (2012) Evaluation of a direct
reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplication
method without RNA extraction for the detection of human
enterovirus 71 subgenotype C4 in nasopharyngeal swab
specimens. PLoS One 7: e52486.
7. Ma S., Mao Q., Liang Z., Zhang C., Yang W., Sun Z., Zhang H.,
Shen X., Bi S., Sun L. (2013) Development of a sandwich ELISA
for the quantication of enterovirus 71. Cytotechnology Epub
ahead of print.
8. Zhu D., Zhao X.Y., Yao Y., Dai F.F., He H., Li R.Q., Jin R.H., Liang
L.C., Li N. (2013) A new factor inuencing pathogen detection by
molecular assay in children with both mild and severe hand, foot,
and mouth disease. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 76: 1627.
9. Lui Y.L., Timms P., Hafner L.M., Tan T.L., Tan K.H., Tan E.L.
(2013) Characterisation of enterovirus 71 replication kinetics in
human colorectal cell line, HT29. Springerplus 2: 267.
10. Mizuta K., Abiko C., Murata T., Matsuzaki Y., Itagaki T.,
Sanjoh K., Sakamoto M., Hongo S., Murayama S., Hayasaka K.
(2005) Frequent importation of enterovirus 71 from
surrounding countries into the local community of Yamagata,
Japan, between 1998 and 2003. J Clin Microbiol 43: 61715.
11. Luo M., Yang H., Zhang H.L., Xian H.X., Chen H.L., Wu W.,
Yao X.J., He Y.J. (2012) Study on isolation of viruses from
patients with hand-foot and mouth disease patients. China Trop
Med 12: 4035 (in Chinese).
12. He S.J., Han J.F., Ding X.X., Wang Y.D., Qin C.F. (2013)
Characterization of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16
isolated in hand, foot, and mouth disease patients in
Guangdong, 2010. Int J Infect Dis 17: e102530.
13. Tsai J.D., Tsai H.J., Lin T.H., Chang Y.Y., Yang S.H., Kuo H.T.
(2014) Comparison of the detection rates of RT-PCR and virus
culture using a combination of specimens from multiple sites
for enterovirus-associated encephalomyelitis during Enterovirus
71 epidemic. Jpn J Infect Dis 67: 3338.
14. Dang M., Wang X., Wang Q., Wang Y., Lin J., Sun Y., Li X.,
Zhang L., Lou Z., Wang J., Rao Z. (2014) Molecular mechanism
of SCARB2-mediated attachment and uncoating of EV71.
Protein Cell 5: 692703.
15. Ji P., Chen C., Hu Y., Zhan Z., Pan W., Li R., Li E., Ge H.M.,
Yang G. (2015) Antiviral activity of Paulownia tomentosa
482
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.