Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Sixteenth Century Journal is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Sixteenth Century
Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 125.167.130.115 on Sun, 09 Aug 2015 11:10:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Navar-
This content downloaded from 125.167.130.115 on Sun, 09 Aug 2015 11:10:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
82
they raise, from the start, other important issues; for example, Amadour's virtue or lack thereof in no. 10,2 the Comte de Jossebelin's right to
decide whom his sister marries in no. 40, the obligations and rights of
husband, wife, servant, suitor, and mistress in no. 70. On the other
hand, tale nos. 19, 24, and 64 all focus on the unconsummated love of
unmarried couples and they have several important motifs in common.
One or the other of the frustrated parties writes a poem during the
course of the relationship.3 A thwarted lover either enters a monastery
or becomes a hermit. And finally, this same lover dies or is obsessed
with death. These various manifestations of disappointed love exemplify Freud's analysis of the dualism of the instincts, and his analysis of the
function of religion and art.4 Marguerite does not ultimately reveal, as
Donald Stone suggests, an ideal of conduct that is "ahuman" (p. 476),
but rather depicts behavior that is profoundly human.
Seen within a Freudian framework, the three stories under consideration constitute different stages in the renunciation of the life instincts,
with no. 19 revealing most clearly the Freudian paradox of the simultaneous abandonment and fulfillment of desire. I shall begin with a discussion of no. 64, which illustrates the least successful renunciation of the
life instincts.
In this tale,5 a gentleman from Valencia loves a lady "parfaictement", but is rejected by her for marriage. He "copes" with this disappointment by becoming a Cordelier. In Freudian psychology,6 religion is
a neurosis which "seems to be based on the suppression, the renunciation, of certain instinctual impulses."7 Man turns to religion (as well as
to other escapes) because life is difficult, painful, and full of disappointment.8 But the gentleman does not find consolation in religion. Failing
to achieve the happy life he hoped for, he chooses the most unpleasant
2See M. J. Baker, "Didacticism and the Heptame'ron:The Misinterpretation of the Tenth
Tale as an Exemplum," French Review 45 (1971-72), Special Issue 3, 84-90.
3Poems are found in only four of the stories in the Heptame'ron.All the poems occur in
the context of lack of fulfillment in love. Tale no. 13 differs from the other three, however,
in that the "perfect" lover is married, and he does not turn to divine love.
4Freudian thought has of course been challenged over the years. But whether there is
an innate death wish, as Freud claims, or whether such a wish is the result of individual
stress or cultural influences, there is general agreement that a desire for death does exist.
Theorists also generally agree that one function of art can be to sublimate the writer's
neuroses, and that religion is often used as an escape from various problems, including
sexual repression.
5Page references to the Heptame'ronwill be indicated in parentheses following the allusions or quotations. The edition is that of Michel Franqois (Paris: Garnier, 1964).
6A11quotations from Freud are taken from Sigmund Freud, The StandardEdition of the
CompletePsychological Works, 24. vols., ed. James Strachey, trans., James Strachey, Anna
Freud, Alix Strachey, and Alan Tyson, (London: Hogarth Press, 1953-74), hereafter cited
S.E. followed by vol. no. and p. no.
7"Obsessive Acts and Religious Practices," S.E. 9: 125.
8"Civilization and its Discontents," S.E. 21: 75.
This content downloaded from 125.167.130.115 on Sun, 09 Aug 2015 11:10:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Psychology of Love
83
This content downloaded from 125.167.130.115 on Sun, 09 Aug 2015 11:10:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
84
Finally, the obsession of both gentleman and lady with death reflects one pole of that opposition of the death instincts to the life instincts described by Freud. In Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Freud writes
that the sexual instincts "are the true life instincts. They operate against
the purpose of the other instincts, which leads, by reason of their function, to death; and this fact indicates that there is an opposition between
them and the other instincts....
When the gentleman cannot satisfy
his passion, he turns towards death. In the monastery, the thought of
death becomes his "souveraine consolation" (p. 494). Similarly, the
lady, in her poem, expresses the thought that if she cannot fulfill her
passion, she wishes for death: "Or doncques, amy, la vie de ma vie, /Lequel perdant, n'ay plus de vivre envie" (p. 385).
In tale no. 24, the turn away from human love is seen as a cruel loss;
however, Elisor's conversion to divine love represents a more successful
sublimation of the sexual instincts than that of the gentleman in no. 64.
When Elisor reveals his secret (and perfect) seven-year love to the
Queen, she tests his love by banishing him for another seven years, a
sentence described as a "cruel commandement" (p. 197). Elisor ultimately responds by becoming a hermit. A hermit's life is described by
Freud as a relatively thorough way of remedying one's unhappiness in
relationships with others. The choice to become a hermit is made when
reality is regarded "as the sole enemy and as the source of all suffering,
with which it is impossible to live, so that one must break off all relations
with it if one is to be in any way happy. The hermit turns his back on the
world and will have no truck with it.'"13
Elisor also responds in art: he sends the Queen a poem he has written. He takes that step described by Freud in which a new world is
created from which "the most unbearable features are eliminated and
replaced by others that are in conformity with one's own wishes."'14
Elisor describes a new reality, a reality in which love is miraculously fulfilled. He affirms that Time has revealed to him the worthlessness of her
beauty (which hid cruelty), and the true worth of God's love. What
makes his sublimation more successful than that of the gentleman in no.
64 is the more complete substitution of divine for human love. He now
has an "amour veritable" (p. 199) to which he owes his "service." Perfect love is no longer the love he felt for the Queen in the past, but the
enduring love of God: "Car l'autre amour parfaicte et pardurable / Me
joinct 'a luy d'un lien immuable" (p. 200). The greater success of this
sublimation is also suggested by the absence of a fantasy expressed in
future time; a fulfilled present is described, seen in opposition to a disappointed past.
the Pleasure Principle," S. E. 18: 40.
'3"Civilization," S. E. 9: 81.
'4"Civilization," S.E. 9: 81.
'2"Beyond
This content downloaded from 125.167.130.115 on Sun, 09 Aug 2015 11:10:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Psychologyof Love
85
Near the end of the story, Marguerite's narrative betrays some ambivalence towards this move to religion. One reads that the Queen had
sustained an unrecoverable loss, "ce que tous les biens du monde ne
povoient recouvrer" (p. 200). The turn to divine love appears to be seen
as a regrettable denial of human love. Even though the relationship between Elisor and the Queen is not an ideal one, Elisor's rejection of love
does not come without a cost. In a curious passage near the beginning of
the story, the omniscient authorial narrator observes that Elisor's love
was an illness giving such pleasure that the only cure could be death"une malladye, donnant tel contantement que la guarison estoit la
mort" (p. 197). In point of fact, Elisor doesdie when he recovers from
love-God "le tira en paradis" (p. 200)-thus reminding us again of that
opposition between life and death instincts outlined by Freud.
Tale no. 19 shares the insights into the reasons for the conversion
from human to divine love given in tale nos. 64 and 24. The gentleman
suitor turns to the monastery because life is too hard for him. He is
denied the possibility of marriage with Poline; he must abandon his sexual aims with regard to her. An ambivalence towards the sincerity and
the virtue of the conversion is expressed in this story just as in the
others. The gardienat the monastery views the gentleman as having too
many good and noble qualities to be a Cordelier: "il avoit en luy toutes
les bonnes et honnestes vertuz que l'on eust sceu desirer en ung gentil
homme" (p. 146). The gentleman is referred to twice as a "pauvre serviteur" (p. 149). He too, like the lover in no. 64, is not completely successful in repressing his sexual instincts: When he hears Poline cough in
the church, he recognizes that sound better than the bells of his monastery (p. 149).
But despite these negative signs, the gentleman does achieve a relatively successful renunciation of sexual aims. The success of his sublimation is suggested first of all in the poem he sends to Poline. Again,
the poem is an attempt to come to terms with the renunciation of sexual
satisfaction. The special emphasis of the poem is on the future, or the
wish fulfillment stage. It illustrates Freud's notion that we never give up
anything, but simply exchange one thing for another.15 The gentleman
uses a vocabulary that would normally be applied to married love to
describe a love of God.16 The soul becomes God's bride. He writes:
"nostre ame / Est de Dieu amie et femme" (p. 147). Poline, when she
makes the same move to divine love, says to her former suitor that they
must put aside the body and accept Christ as their spouse: "Oblyons le
15"Actually, we can never give anything up; we only exchange one thing for another.
What appears to be a renunciation is really the formation of a substitute or surrogate."
"Creative Writers" S.E. 9: 145.
16We saw this on a smaller scale in no. 24.
This content downloaded from 125.167.130.115 on Sun, 09 Aug 2015 11:10:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
86
SixteenthCenturyJournal
corps qui perit et tient du viel Adan, pour recepvoir et revestir celluy de
nostre espoux Jesus-Christ" (p. 150).17
Second, the gentleman and Poline both attain a certain happiness.
Although the renunciation of human love has involved suffering and
the acceptance of "unpleasure", it results ultimately in pleasure. When
Poline affirms her conversion to divine love, her former suitor weeps
with joy (p. 150). Poline herself leaves in great happiness (p. 150). Even
death does not have an unpleasurable connotation. The gentleman
alludes in his poem to both his and Poline's deaths, and invites her to
flee the world with him. This invitation hints at a greater joy to come, by
virtue of its reference to the phoenix and that mythical animal's association with immortality.18
Freud points out that the characteristic transformation of instincts
from the mobile cathectic energy to the quiescent cathexis does not
ultimately exclude pleasure. Unpleasure may occur along the way, but
"the transformation occurs on behalfof the pleasure principle; the binding is a preparatory act which introduces and assures the dominance of
the pleasure principle'" Thus the turn to religion in this story illustrates
the Freudian paradox of the simultaneous abandonment and fulfillment
of desire.20 One could plausibly argue that tale nos. 64 and 24 represent
a less complete binding of the instinctual impulses, with the neurosis occasioned by repressed sexuality not working itself out to its possible
limit. Pleasure, approached by a long and indirect road, is not reached in
these last two stories, even though the characters may long for it.
The presence of these intriguing parallels between Marguerite and
Freud attests to the acuteness of Marguerite's understanding of human
nature. As Rene Girard has pointed out, a creative writer may make ex17Robert D. Cottrell, in The Grammar of Silence: A Reading of Marguerite de Navarre's
Poetry (Washington, D.C., The Catholic University of America Press, 1986), has commented extensively on the use of erotic vocabulary in Marguerite's religious poetry. He
points out that the metaphor of the soul being united in marriage with Christ as bridegroom was common in the poetry of the mystics (p. 39). He indicates the major influence
of Briqonnet here, the bishop of Meaux with whom Marguerite corresponded between
1521 and 1524. I would simply add that one could argue that the use of erotic vocabulary in
Marguerite's religious poetry serves the same function that it does in the poetry in her
stories: it constitutes an evasion from sexual repression.
'8The lines from the poem are as follows:
Ne crains a prendre
L'habit de cendre
Fuyant ce monde ennemy.
Car, d'amitye vive et forte,
De sa cendre fault que sorte
Le phoenix qui durera (p. 148).
19"Pleasure Principle," S. E. 18: 62.
20Paul Ricoeur has a useful discussion of this paradox in De l'Interpre'tation:Essai sur
Freud (Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1965), 272.
This content downloaded from 125.167.130.115 on Sun, 09 Aug 2015 11:10:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Psychology of Love
87
21Rene Girard, "Narcissism: The Freudian Myth Demythified by Proust," in Psychoanalysis, Creativity, and Literature:A French-AmericanInquiry, ed. Alan Roland (New York:
Columbia University Press, 1978), 293-311.
22W. H. Auden, "Psychology and Art To-day," in The English Auden: Poems, Essays and
Dramatic Writings 1927-1932, ed. Edward Mendelson, (London: Faber and Faber, 1977),
332-42.
This content downloaded from 125.167.130.115 on Sun, 09 Aug 2015 11:10:22 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions