Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
■ Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13 [Amended]
■ 2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by removing amendment 39–8919 (59
FR 27231, May 26, 1994) and by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2006–01–04 Raytheon Aircraft Company:
Amendment 39–14443. Docket No.
FAA–2005–20969; Directorate Identifier
2005–NM–017–AD.
Effective Date
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
(a) This AD becomes effective February 22,
2006.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 94–11–03.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:03 Jan 17, 2006 Jkt 208001
2859
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Raytheon Model
DH.125, HS.125, and BH.125 series airplanes;
Model BAe.125 Series 800A (C–29A and U–
125), 800B, 1000A, and 1000B airplanes; and
Model Hawker 800 (including variant U–
125A), and 1000 airplanes, certificated in any
category; as identified in Raytheon Service
Bulletin SB 21–3669, dated December 2004.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports indicating
that the fan venturi overheated and produced
smoke while the airplane was on the ground.
We are issuing this AD to prevent heat and
fire damage to equipment adjacent to the fan
venturi, which could result in smoke in the
cabin and/or burning equipment.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Modification or Replacement
(f) Within 1,200 flight hours or 24 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, do the action in either paragraph
(f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Raytheon Service Bulletin SB 21–3669, dated
December 2004.
(1) Modify the existing fan venturi part
number (P/N) 132322–2–1 by installing an
improved motor, P/N 207640–34.
(2) Replace the existing fan venturi P/N
132322–2–1 with a new fan venturi P/N
132322–3–1.
Note 1: Raytheon Service Bulletin SB 21–
3669 refers to Honeywell Service Bulletin
132322–21–4041, Revision 2, dated August
20, 2004, as an additional source of service
information for doing the modification. The
Raytheon service bulletin includes the
Honeywell service bulletin.
Parts Installation
(g) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a fan venturi, P/N
132322–2–1, on any airplane unless the fan
venturi has been modified in accordance
with paragraph (f)(1) of this AD; or unless the
fan venturi has a new P/N in accordance with
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD.
Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC)
(h)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
the appropriate principal inspector in the
FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding
District Office.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Raytheon Service Bulletin
SB 21–3669, dated December 2004, including
Honeywell Service Bulletin 132322–21–4041,
Revision 2, dated August 20, 2004, to
perform the actions that are required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this document
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Contact Raytheon Aircraft Company,
Department 62, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas
67201–0085, for a copy of this service
information. You may review copies at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
Street SW., room PL–401, Nassif Building,
Washington, DC; on the Internet at http://
dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at the NARA, call (202) 741–6030,
or go to http://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 23, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 06–403 Filed 1–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2002–NM–105–AD; Amendment
39–14441; AD 2006–01–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell
Douglas Model DC–9–14, DC–9–15,
and DC–9–15F Airplanes; Model DC–9–
20, DC–9–30, DC–9–40, and DC–9–50
Series Airplanes; Model DC–9–81 (MD–
81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–
83), and DC–9–87 (MD–87) Airplanes;
Model MD–88 Airplanes; and Model
MD–90–30 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a
new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain McDonnell
Douglas transport category airplanes,
that requires an inspection of the upper
lock link assembly of the nose landing
gear (NLG) to determine the
manufacturer, repetitive eddy current
inspections for cracking, and
modification or replacement if
necessary. This AD also provides for
optional terminating action for the
repetitive inspections. The actions
specified by this AD are intended to
prevent fracture of the upper lock link
assembly of the NLG, which could
result in failure of the NLG to extend
following a gear-down selection, and
consequent gear-up landing, structural
damage, and possible injury to
18JAR1
 2860 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
passengers and crew. This action is
intended to address the identified
unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective February 22, 2006.
The incorporation by reference of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9–
32A340, Revision 01, excluding
Appendix A, dated April 29, 2003; and
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90–
32A054, Revision 01, excluding
Appendix A, dated April 29, 2003; as
listed in the regulations, is approved by
the Director of the Federal Register as of
February 22, 2006.
The incorporation by reference of
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin
DC9–32–315, dated March 11, 1999;
Boeing Service Bulletin DC9–32–315,
Revision 01, dated October 24, 2000;
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin
MD90–32–033, dated March 11, 1999;
and Boeing Service Bulletin MD90–32–
033, Revision 01, dated October 24,
2000; as listed in the regulations, was
approved previously by the Director of
the Federal Register as of March 28,
2002 (67 FR 7949, February 21, 2002).
ADDRESSES: The service information
referenced in this AD may be obtained
from Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California
90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1–L5A (D800–
0024). This information may be
examined at the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Lee, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California 90712–4137; telephone (562)
627–5325; fax (562) 627–5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an airworthiness directive (AD)
that is applicable to certain DC–9–14,
DC–9–15, DC–9–15F, DC–9–21, DC–9–
31, DC–9–32, DC–9–32 (VC–9C), DC–9–
32F, DC–9–33F, DC–9–34, DC–9–34F,
DC–9–32F (C–9A, C–9B), DC–9–41, DC–
9–51, DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC–9–82
(MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–83), and DC–9–
87 (MD–87) airplanes; MD–88 airplanes;
and MD–90–30 airplanes; was
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
published as a supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register on June 14, 2005 (70
FR 34411). That action proposed to
require an inspection of the upper lock
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:03 Jan 17, 2006 Jkt 208001
link assembly of the nose landing gear
(NLG) to determine the manufacturer,
repetitive eddy current inspections for
cracking, modification or replacement if
necessary, and related concurrent
actions. That action also proposed to
provide optional terminating action for
the repetitive inspections.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded
an opportunity to participate in the
making of this amendment. Due
consideration has been given to the
comments received.
Request To Approve Alternative
Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) for
AD 2002–04–01 as AMOCs for the
Supplemental NPRM
One commenter request that we
approve AMOCs approved previously
for AD 2002–04–01, amendment 39–
12658 (67 FR 7949, February 21, 2002),
as AMOCs for the supplemental NPRM.
The commenter notes that paragraph (i)
of the proposed AD states that the Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, can approve AMOCs for
this AD but does not state whether
previously approved AMOCs are
applicable to this AD. The commenter
notes that it has received an AMOC
approval letter for AD 2002–04–01 for
an alternate marking method applicable
to upper lock links.
We agree with the commenter.
AMOCs approved for AD 2002–04–01
are acceptable for compliance as
AMOCs for the actions specified in
paragraph (f) of the final rule. Therefore,
we have added paragraph (i)(3) to the
final rule.
Request To List Part Numbers
One commenter requests that we list
all affected part numbers as indicated in
Figure 1 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
DC9–32A340, Revision 01, dated April
29, 2003, which was referenced as the
appropriate source of service
information for doing the actions in the
supplemental NPRM for certain
airplanes. The commenter did not
provide justification for the request.
We do not agree with the commenter.
The final rule requires an inspection of
the upper lock link assembly in
accordance with the applicable service
bulletin. Those service bulletins clearly
specify the affected part numbers in
Figure 1. No further clarification is
necessary. Including part numbers in
the final rule would unnecessarily
lengthen the final rule and add the
potential for typographical errors. We
have not revised the final rule in this
regard.
PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
Request To Revise the Compliance Time
One commenter requests that we
revise the compliance time in the
supplemental NPRM to be synchronized
with the requirements of AD 2002–04–
01, which was cited in the supplemental
NPRM as the source of certain
concurrent requirements. The
commenter states that the actions
specified in the supplemental NPRM
conflict with the compliance time
mandated by AD 2002–04–01. The
commenter notes that it has inspected
124 units in accordance with Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin DC9–32A340
with no evidence of damage. The
commenter questions why the
supplemental NPRM should have a
more stringent compliance threshold
that conflicts with the threshold in AD
2002–04–01.
We disagree with the commenter
because AD 2002–04–01 and this final
rule address different identified unsafe
conditions. The compliance time in this
final rule corresponds with the
manufacturer’s recommended
compliance times specified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin DC9–32A340. In
developing an appropriate compliance
time for this final rule, we considered
the urgency associated with the subject
unsafe condition, the manufacturer’s
recommendation, the availability of
required parts, and the practical aspect
of accomplishing the required actions
within a period of time that corresponds
to the normal scheduled maintenance
for most affected operators. However,
according to the provisions of paragraph
(i) of the final rule, we may approve
requests to adjust the compliance time
if the request includes data that prove
that the new compliance time would
provide an acceptable level of safety.
We have not revised the final rule in
this regard.
Clarification of Terminating Action
We have revised paragraphs (d) and
(e) of this AD to clarify that the
terminating action terminates only the
inspections specified in paragraphs (b)
and (c) of this AD. The parts installation
requirement specified in paragraph (h)
of this AD remains applicable.
We have also replaced the phrase
‘‘with a new or serviceable upper link
lock assembly’’ in paragraph (e)(2) of
this AD with ‘‘with an upper lock link
assembly, part number (P/N) 5965065–
511’’ to clarify the replacement part.
Upper link lock assemblies having other
P/Ns must be modified as specified in
paragraph (e)(1) of this AD in order to
be a replacement part.
18JAR1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Clarification of AMOC Paragraph
We have revised this action to clarify
the appropriate procedure for notifying
the principal inspector before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available
data, including the comments noted
above, the FAA has determined that air
safety and the public interest require the
adoption of the rule with the changes
previously described. The FAA has
determined that these changes will
neither increase the economic burden
on any operator nor increase the scope
of the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 2,021
airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that
1,212 airplanes of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD.
It will take approximately 1 work
hour per airplane to accomplish the
general visual inspection, at an average
labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based
on these figures, the cost impact of the
general visual inspection on U.S.
operators is estimated to be $78,780, or
$65 per airplane.
It will take approximately 1 work
hour per airplane to accomplish the
high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection, at an average labor rate of
$65 per work hour. Based on these
figures, the cost impact of the HFEC
inspection on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $78,780, or $65 per
airplane, per inspection cycle.
It would take approximately 8 work
hours per airplane to accomplish the
replacement, if done, at an average labor
rate of $65 per work hour. Required
parts cost approximately $6,346 for a
new part. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of the replacement on U.S.
operators is estimated to be $6,866 per
airplane.
Model—
DC–9–14, DC–9–15, DC–9–15F, DC–9–21, DC–9–31, DC–9–32, DC–
9–32 (VC–9C), DC–9–32F, DC–9–33F, DC–9–34, DC–9–34F, DC–
9–32F (C–9A, C–9B), DC–9–41, DC–9–51, DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC–
9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–83), and DC–9–87 (MD–87) air-
planes; and MD–88 airplanes.
MD–90–30 airplanes ................................................................................
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless
accomplished previously.
To prevent fracture of the upper lock link
assembly of the nose landing gear (NLG),
which could result in failure of the NLG to
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:03 Jan 17, 2006 Jkt 208001
The cost impact figure discussed
above is based on assumptions that no
operator has yet accomplished any of
the requirements of this AD action, and
that no operator would accomplish
those actions in the future if this AD
were not adopted. The cost impact
figures discussed in AD rulemaking
actions represent only the time
necessary to perform the specific actions
actually required by the AD. These
figures typically do not include
incidental costs, such as the time
required to gain access and close up,
planning time, or time necessitated by
other administrative actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, it is
determined that this final rule does not
TABLE 1.—APPLICABILITY
As identified in—
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9–32A340, Revision 01, dated April
29, 2003.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90–32A054, Revision 01, dated April
29, 2003.
extend following a gear-down selection, and
consequent gear-up landing, structural
damage, and possible injury to passengers
and crew; accomplish the following:
PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700
2861
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this action (1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3)
will not have a significant economic
impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has
been prepared for this action and it is
contained in the Rules Docket. A copy
of it may be obtained from the Rules
Docket at the location provided under
the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
■ Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13 [Amended]
■ 2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
2006–01–02 McDonnell Douglas:
Amendment 39–14441. Docket 2002–
NM–105–AD.
Applicability: This AD applies to airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
Table 1 of this AD.
Service Bulletin References
(a) The term ‘‘service bulletin,’’ as used in
this AD, means the Accomplishment
Instructions of the service bulletin specified
in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD, as
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM 18JAR1
 2862 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
applicable. Although the service bulletins
referenced in this AD specify to submit
information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include such a requirement.
(1) For Model DC–9–14, DC–9–15, DC–9–
15F, DC–9–21, DC–9–31, DC–9–32, DC–9–32
(VC–9C), DC–9–32F, DC–9–33F, DC–9–34,
DC–9–34F, DC–9–32F (C–9A, C–9B), DC–9–
41, DC–9–51, DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC–9–82
(MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–83), and DC–9–87
(MD–87) airplanes; and MD–88 airplanes:
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9–32A340,
Revision 01, excluding Appendix A, dated
April 29, 2003; and
(2) For Model MD–90–30 airplanes: Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD90–32A054,
Revision 01, excluding Appendix A, dated
April 29, 2003.
Inspections
(b) Within 2,500 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD: Do a general visual
inspection to determine if the upper lock link
assembly of the NLG was manufactured by
Ready Machine and Manufacturing Company
(this can be identified by the letters ‘‘RM’’
adjacent to the serial number), in accordance
with the service bulletin. Instead of the
inspection, a review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable if the manufacturer of
the upper lock link assembly can be
positively determined from that review.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
general visual inspection is: ‘‘A visual
examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation or assembly to detect obvious
damage, failure or irregularity. This level of
Do these actions—
Replace the lock link with a new upper lock
link, a reidentified upper lock link, or a new
upper lock link assemby, and do any applica-
ble inspections.
Actions Accomplished in Accordance With
Previous Issues of Service Bulletins
(g) Actions accomplished before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9–32A340;
and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90–
32A054; both dated November 14, 2001; are
considered acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding actions specified in this
AD.
Parts Installation
(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install, on any airplane, any part
specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of
this AD, unless it has been modified
according to the service bulletin.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
(1) Any upper lock link assembly, P/N
5965065–1, 5965065–501, 5965065–503, or
5965065–507.
(2) Any upper lock link, P/N 3914464–1,
3914464–501, 3914464–503, or 3914464–507.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:03 Jan 17, 2006 Jkt 208001
inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror
may be necessary to ensure visual access to
all surfaces in the inspection area. This level
of inspection is made under normal available
lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar
lighting, flashlight or drop-light and may
require removal or opening of access panels
or doors. Stands, ladders or platforms may be
required to gain proximity to the area being
checked.’’
(1) If the upper lock link assembly of the
NLG was manufactured by Ready Machine
and Manufacturing Company: Within 2,500
flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, do a high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection of the assembly for cracking, in
accordance with Condition 1 of the service
bulletin.
(2) If the upper lock link assembly was not
manufactured by Ready Machine and
Manufacturing Company: Within 3,500 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD, do
an HFEC inspection of the assembly for
cracking, in accordance with Condition 2 of
the service bulletin.
No Cracking Found
(c) If no cracking is found during any HFEC
inspection required by paragraph (b) of this
AD, repeat the HFEC inspection specified in
paragraph (b) of this AD at intervals not to
exceed 4,000 flight cycles until
accomplishment of either paragraph (e)(1) or
(e)(2) of this AD.
TABLE 2.—PRIOR OR CONCURRENT ACTIONS
Required by—
AD 2002–04–01, amendment 39–12658 .........
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(i)(1) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the
Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, FAA, is authorized to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
the appropriate principal inspector in the
FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding
District Office.
(3) AMOCs approved previously according
to AD 2002–04–01, amendment 39–12658,
are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of paragraph (f) of
this AD.
Incorporation by Reference
(j) Unless otherwise specified in this AD,
the actions must be done in accordance with
the applicable service bulletin listed in Table
3 of this AD.
PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
Cracking Found
(d) If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (b) or (c) of
this AD, before further flight, do the
replacement of the upper lock link assembly
as specified in either paragraph (e)(1) or (e)(2)
of this AD. Accomplishment of this action
constitutes terminating action for the
repetitive inspection requirements of
paragraph (c) this AD.
Optional Terminating Action
(e) Doing the actions specified in either
paragraph (e)(1) or (e)(2) of this AD
constitutes terminating action for the
inspection requirements of paragraphs (b)
and (c) of this AD.
(1) Replace the upper lock link assembly of
the NLG with an upper lock link assembly
modified in accordance with the service
bulletin. The modification includes
refinishing an uncracked upper lock link
assembly, and doing related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with the
service bulletin.
(2) Replace the cracked upper lock link
assembly of the NLG with an upper lock link
assembly, part number (P/N) 5965065–511,
in accordance with the service bulletin.
Prior or Concurrent Actions Required To Be
Done With Paragraph (b) of This AD
(f) Before or concurrently with the actions
required by paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this
AD, as applicable, do the actions specified in
Table 2 of this AD.
In accordance with—
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9–32–
315, dated March 11, 1999, or Boeing
Service Bulletin DC9–32–315, Revision 01,
dated October 24, 2000; or McDonnell
Douglas Service Bulletin MD90–32–033,
dated March 11, 1999, or Boeing Service
Bulletin MD90–32–033, Revision 01, dated
October 24, 2000; as applicable.
(1) The incorporation by reference of the
service bulletins listed in Table 4 of this AD
is approved by the Director of the Federal
Register, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) The incorporation by reference of the
service bulletins listed in Table 5 of this AD
was approved previously by the Director of
the Federal Register as of March 28, 2002 (67
FR 7949, February 21, 2002).
(3) To get copies of this service
information, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855
Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California
90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1–L5A (D800–0024). To
inspect copies of this service information, go
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or go to the FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or to the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
18JAR1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 2863

the availability of this material at the NARA, code_of_federal_regulations/

call (202) 741–6030, or go to http:// ibr_locations.html.
www.archives.gov/federal_register/

TABLE 3.—ALL MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Service bulletin Revision level Date

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9–32A340 .............................................................................................. Revision 01 .... April 29, 2003.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90–32A054 ............................................................................................ Revision 01 .... April 29, 2003.
Boeing Service Bulletin DC9–32–315 ....................................................................................................... Revision 01 .... October 24, 2000.
Boeing Service Bulletin MD90–32–033 ..................................................................................................... Revision 01 .... October 24, 2000.
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9–32–315 ................................................................................... Original .......... March 11, 1999.
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD90–32–033 ................................................................................. Original .......... March 11, 1999.

TABLE 4.—MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS AD

Service bulletin Revision level Date

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9–32A340, excluding Appendix A ......................................................... Revision 01 .... April 29, 2003.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90–32A054, excluding Appendix A ....................................................... Revision 01 .... April 29, 2003.

TABLE 5.—MATERIAL PREVIOUSLY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Service bulletin Revision level Date

Boeing Service Bulletin DC9–32–315 ....................................................................................................... Revision 01 .... October 24, 2000.
Boeing Service Bulletin MD90–32–033 ..................................................................................................... Revision 01 .... October 24, 2000.
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9–32–315 ................................................................................... Original .......... March 11, 1999.
McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD90–32–033 ................................................................................. Original .......... March 11, 1999.

Effective Date based on the most recent schedule of
(k) This amendment becomes effective on fees for the use of linear rights-of-way
February 22, 2006. prepared by the United States Forest
Issued in Renton, Washington, on Service. Since the next fiscal year will
December 20, 2005. cover the period from October 1, 2005
Kalene C. Yanamura, through September 30, 2006 the fees in
this notice are effective October 1, 2005.
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. The fees will apply to fiscal year 2006
annual charges for the use of
[FR Doc. 06–404 Filed 1–17–06; 8:45 am]
government lands.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
The Commission has concluded, with
the concurrence of the Administrator of
the Office of Information and Regulatory
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Affairs of OMB that this rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined in section 251
Federal Energy Regulatory
of the Small Business Regulatory
Commission
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5
U.S.C 804(2).
18 CFR PART 11
[Docket No. RM06–9–000] DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Update of the Federal Energy Fannie Kingsberry, Division of Financial
Regulatory Commission’s Fees Services, Office of the Executive
Schedule for Annual Charges for the Director, Federal Energy Regulatory
Use of Government Lands Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
January 10, 2006.
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–6108.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Commission. Document Availability: In addition to
ACTION: Final rule; update of Federal publishing the full text of this document
land use fees. in the Federal Register, the Commission
provides all interested persons an
SUMMARY: In accordance with the opportunity to view and/or print the
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Eastern time) at 888 First Street, NE.,
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426.
From FERC’s Home Page on the
Internet, this information is available in
the eLibrary (formerly FERRIS). The full
text of this document is available on
eLibrary in PDF and MSWord format for
viewing, printing, and/or downloading.
To access this document in eLibrary,
type the docket number excluding the
last three digits of this document in the
docket number field.
User assistance is available for
eLibrary and the FERC’s Web site during
normal business hours by contacting
FERC Online Support by telephone at
(866) 208–3676 (toll free) or for TTY,
(202) 502–8659, or by e-mail at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov.
List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 11
Electric power, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Thomas R. Herlihy,
Executive Director, Office of the Executive
Director.
■ Accordingly, the Commission,
effective October 1, 2005, amends part
11 of Chapter I, Title 18 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 11—[AMENDED]

Commission’s regulations, the contents of this document via the

Commission by its designee, the Internet through FERC’s Home Page ■ 1. The authority citation for part 11
Executive Director, is updating its (http://www.ferc.gov) and in FERC’s continues to read as follows:
schedule of fees for the use of Public Reference Room during normal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 791a–825r; 42 U.S.C.
government lands. The yearly update is business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 7101–7352.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:03 Jan 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM 18JAR1