Anda di halaman 1dari 1

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

245 / Thursday, December 22, 2005 / Notices 76077

On September 13, 2005, complainant 3. Ratification List Site, plus a premium. In return for these
Trend Micro filed a complaint for 4. Inv. No. 731–TA–663 (Second payments, each defendant would
enforcement proceedings of the Review) (Paper Clips from China)— receive a covenant not to sue by the
Commission’s remedial orders. On briefing and vote. (The Commission United States, subject to certain
October 7, 2005, the Commission is currently scheduled to transmit reservations of rights, and contribution
determined to institute formal its determination and protection from suit by other potentially
enforcement proceedings based on the Commissioners’ opinions to the responsible parties. The total recovery
complaint to determine whether Secretary of Commerce on or before under this Consent Decree should be
Fortinet is in violation of the January 18, 2006.) approximately $412,000.
Commission’s cease and desist order 5. Outstanding action jackets: none
issued in the investigation, and what if In accordance with Commission The Department of Justice will receive
any enforcement measures are policy, subject matter listed above, not comments relating to this Consent
appropriate. disposed of at the scheduled meeting, Decree for a period of thirty (30) days
On October 26, 2005, Fortinet filed a may be carried over to the agenda of the from the date of this publication.
request for an advisory opinion under following meeting. Comments should be addressed to the
Commission Rule 210.79 (19 CFR Assistant Attorney General,
Issued: December 20, 2005.
210.79) that would declare that Environment and Natural Resources
By order of the Commission.
Fortinet’s FortiGate products Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
incorporating Fortinet’s newly Department of Justice, Washington, DC
redesigned anti-virus software do not Secretary to the Commission. 20044–7611, attention: Lisa A. Cherup,
infringe claims 4, 7, 8, and 11–15 of the [FR Doc. 05–24443 Filed 12–20–05; 3:17 pm] and should refer to United States v.
‘600 patent and, therefore, are not BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Airco Co., et al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–1762/
covered by the Commission’s cease and 3.
desist order and limited exclusion
The Airco Co., et al. Consent Decree
order, issued on August 8, 2005. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
may be examined at the Office of the
The Commission has examined
Fortinet’s request for an advisory Notice of Lodging of Third Round De United States Attorney for Western
opinion and has determined that the Minimis Consent Decree Under the District of Pennsylvania, at 700 Grant
request complies with the requirements Comprehensive Environmental Street, Suite 400, Pittsburgh, PA 15219
for institution of an advisory opinion Response, Compensation and Liability (ask for Robert Eberhardt), and at U.S.
proceeding under Commission rule Act EPA Region III’s Office, 1650 Arch
210.79(a). Accordingly, the Commission Street, Philadelphia, PA (ask for Mary
Notice is hereby given that on
has determined to institute an advisory Rugala). During the public comment
December 2, 2005, a proposed Third
opinion proceeding and has referred Round De Minimis Consent Decree in period, the United States v. Airco Co.,
Fortinet’s request to the presiding ALJ United States v. Airco Co., et al. Civil et al. consent decree, may also be
for issuance of an initial advisory Action No. 05–1671, was lodged with examined on the following Department
opinion. the United States District Court for the of Justice Web site, http://
This action is taken under the Western District of Pennsylvania. This www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. A copy
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act Consent Decree relates to three other of the consent decree may also be
of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and matters before the same Court: United obtained by mail from the Consent
Commission rules 210.75(a) and States v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., et al., Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
210.79(a), 19 CFR 210.75(a), 210.79(a). C.A. No. 97–1863, United States v. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Issued: December 16, 2005. Aetna, Inc., et al. No. 05–15, and United 20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a
By order of the Commission. States v. Chevy Chase Cars, et al., C.A. request to Tonia Fleetwood
Marilyn R. Abbott, No. 05–1222. All four matters are (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
Secretary to the Commission. Superfund cost recovery actions (202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
[FR Doc. E5–7715 Filed 12–21–05; 8:45 am] commenced by the United States against number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a
potentially responsible parties relating copy from the Consent Decree Library,
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
to the Breslube Penn Superfund Site in please enclose a check in the amount of
Coraopolis, Moon Township, $11.00 (25 cents per page reproduction
INTERNATIONAL TRADE Pennsylvania. cost) for a full copy of the consent
COMMISSION In the Airco Co., et al. action, the decree, or $6.50, for a copy without
United States seeks the recovery of signature pages, payable to the U.S.
[USITC SE–05–047] response costs incurred in connection Treasury.
with the Breslube Penn Superfund Site.
Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice The complaint alleges that each of the Robert Brook,
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: U.S. named defendants arranged for the Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
International Trade Commission. treatment and/or disposal of wastes Section, Environment and Natural Resources
containing hazardous substances at the Division.
TIME AND DATE: January 4, 2006 at 11
Site, within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. [FR Doc. 05–24324 Filed 12–21–05; 8:45 am]
a.m.
9607(a)(3). The complaint names 20 BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., defendants, each of which have signed
Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: the proposed Third Round De Minimis
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES

(202) 205–2000. Consent Decree. Under the Airco Co., et


STATUS: Open to the public. al. Decree, each of the named
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: defendants would pay a proportionate
1. Agenda for future meetings: none share of all past and future response
2. Minutes costs incurred and to be incurred at the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:55 Dec 21, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM 22DEN1

Anda mungkin juga menyukai