Bensenville O'Hare Lawsuit

ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
CALENDAR: X
PAGE 1 of 14
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS,
LAW DIVISION
COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
JACK RISER; HAROLD R. BOTEFUHR;
)
JOSE CORTEZ; CRYSTAL CORTEZ;
)
THOMAS FORMAN; JOANNA FORMAN; )
MIKE NATIELLO; VERA NATIELLO;
)
MAHIR DOSSAJI; REBECCA DOSSAJI;
)
JUNE FRANZ; CZESLAW GORNIAK;
)
JOLANTA GORNIAK; GEORGE LEVITT; )
TAMMY LEVITT; MICHAEL A.
)
MORUZZI; SANDRA A. MORUZZI; JOHN )
F. PELIKAN; GRZEGORZ SLOWIK;
)
GABRIELA SLOWIK; KEITH
)
WOODBURY; SETH DOWLING; BLESSY )
DOWLING; MILTON MERCADO;
)
JEANETTE MERCADO; THOMAS
)
YOHANNAN; DORIS LALLY; DAN
)
KEEHN; NINA KEEHN; JEFFERY
)
AGONATH; MATTHEW MADIAR; JOSE )
AGUIRRE, DAVID D.A. AGUIRRE; OSCAR)
BAEZ; MARK KRAJECKI; JACK
)
EVERMAN; DIANNA ROSCINSKI; ADAM )
MAZURKIEWICZ; LEONARDA
)
GONZALEZ; MALGORZATA LABEDZ;
)
MARCIN DANEWICZ; AGNIESZKA
)
DANEWICZ; DOLORES DAILY; HERB
)
WEIGELT; ZBIGNIEW JAKUBOWSKI;
)
KEN LESTINA; ADAM KRAJEWSKI;
)
BARBARA KRAJEWSKI; JOZEF ANTAL; )
MARTA ANTALOVA; URSZULA
)
NIEMIRSKI; JOHN FINNEGAN; SHERRI )
FINNEGAN; GODOFREDO VICTORINO; )
DARIUSZ KLEPACKI; HENRY
)
HAMMACHER; THOMAS STEFFENSEN; )
PATRICIA STEFFENSEN; FARIDEH
)
BRUESSARD; NORA PORRATA; SOPHIA )
SARNECKI; MAKSIM MANIGODA;
)
BENJAMIN SILVA; GREG FRANKOWSKI; )
LYUDMYLA LUGOVA; OSCAR
)
MADRIGAL; MARIA MADRIGAL; CELIA )
HERNANDEZ; JAMES PAGANUCCI;
)
MICHAEL A. JACKSON; ANTONI
)
CHRZANOWSKI; ORONZO PECONIO;
)
CONCETTA PECONIO,
)
)
CASE NO. _________________
JUDGE: ________________
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF CHICAGO,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs (hereinafter Plaintiffs or Residents), by and through their undersigned

attorneys, Michael I. Leonard, Derek J. Meyer, and Ethan E. White of LeonardMeyer LLP, state
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 2 of 14
as follows as their Complaint against the Defendant, City of Chicago (The City):
CASE SUMMARY
1.
The City owns and operates Chicago OHare International Airport (OHare).
2.
On or about October 17, 2013, the City began operating a new $1.3 billion runway
for the arrival and departure of large commercial aircraft at OHare named Runway 10 C 28 C.
3.
Runway 10 C 28 C (the Runway) has an east and west orientation. The use of
the Runway has substantially increased the east and west flow of aircraft arrival and departures at
OHare, and the noise levels associated with the airplanes using the Runway have increased over
time starting from the commencement of the Citys use of the Runway.
4.
Bensenville, Illinois is located immediately west of the Runway within the lowest
portion of the Runways flight path. Prior to the construction of the Runway, the City acquired
hundreds of residences and businesses in the Bensenville community under threats of
condemnation and eminent domain. The City subsequently demolished these private properties in
connection with the construction of the Runway.
5.
The Residents live in the Bensenville community, in close western proximity to the
former locations of the demolished Bensenville properties.

6.
Many of the Residents lived in their current homes in Bensenville for decades prior
to the opening of the Runway.

7.
The City now operates the Runway both day and night for hundreds of flights a
day. The Residents homes are extremely close the Runway, and airplanes using the Runway fly
at very low altitudes directly over their homes and/or their immediate neighborhood day after day
in an unrelenting fashion given the new Runways flight path.
8.
Ginger Evans, the Commissioner for the Chicago Department of Aviation, recently
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 3 of 14
toured Bensenville and observed, We walked and drove around that neighborhood listening to
the aircraft. That is an area of very high impact.
9.
At all relevant times, the Residents are and were homeowners directly impacted by
the unreasonable and excessive noise, disturbance, and interference with their lives and private
property resulting from the aircraft utilizing the new Runway now located in extraordinarily close
and threatening proximity to their homes. Exhibit A to this Complaint sets forth in a map format
the locations of the Runway and Plaintiffs homes.
10.
The Residents are asserting claims of inverse condemnation against the City based
on the Citys unconstitutional taking of their private properties for public use without just
compensation. That just compensation shall be determined by the finder of fact. Plaintiffs also
assert a claim for unjust enrichment arising out the substantial monetary and economic benefits
the City derives from its use and taking of the Residents property, including but not limited to,
monies earned from the owners of the aircraft that use the Runway.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE

11.
This Court can exercise jurisdiction over this action and venue is proper in
this Circuit because, at all relevant times, the Defendant regularly and continuously did and was
doing business in Cook County, Illinois, and Plaintiffs causes of action arise, at least in part, from
Defendants actions in this County.
THE PARTIES
Plaintiffs
12.
Jack Riser resides in and owns the home at 248 N. Walnut Street in Bensenville,
Illinois.
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 4 of 14
13.
John F. Pelikan resides in and owns the home at 701 W. Hillside Drive in
Bensenville, Illinois.
14.
Harold R. Botefuhr resides in and owns the home at 906 W. Hillside Drive in
15.
Jose and Crystal Cortez reside in and own the home at 1109 Nordic Street in
16.
Mahir and Rebecca Dossaji own the residence at 237 N. Walnut Street, Unit C in
17.
June Franz resides in and owns the home at 902 W. Hillside Drive in Bensenville,
Illinois.
18.
Czeslaw and Jolanta Gorniak reside in and own the home at 579 W. Hillside Drive
in Bensenville, Illinois.
19.
George and Tammy Levitt reside in and own the home at 1114 Green Valley Street
20.
Michael A. and Sandra A. Moruzzi primarily reside in and own the home at 906
Brookwood Street in Bensenville, Illinois, and own another home located at 914 Brookwood Street
21.
Grzegorz and Gabriela Slowik reside in and own the home at 450 W. Hillside Drive
22.
Keith Woodbury resides in and owns the home at 228 Poppy Lane in Bensenville,
Illinois.
23.
Seth and Blessy Dowling reside in and own the home at 1018 Twin Oaks Street in
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 5 of 14
24.
Milton and Jeanette Mercado reside in and own the home at 222 Tioga Avenue in
25.
Thomas Yohannan resides in and owns the home at 221 Marshall Road in
26.
Doris Lally resides in and owns the home at 901 W. Glendale Street in Bensenville,
Illinois.
27.
Dan and Nina Keehn reside in and own the home at 1110 Nordic Street in
28.
Jeffery Agonath resides in and owns the home at 235 Marshall Road in Bensenville,
Illinois.
29.
Matthew Madiar resides in and owns the home at 247 N. Church Road in
30.
Jose Aguirre resides in and owns the home at 231 Tioga Avenue in Bensenville,
Illinois.
31.
David D.A. Aguirre resides in and owns the home at 609 W. Hillside Drive in
32.
Oscar Baez resides in and owns the home at 901 Medinah Street in Bensenville,
Illinois.
33.
Mark Krajecki resides in and owns the home at 901 Brookwood Street in
34.
Jack Everman resides in and owns the home at 228 N. Walnut Street, Unit B, in
35.
Dianna Roscinski resides in and owns the home at 234 N. Walnut Street, Apartment
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 6 of 14
D, in Bensenville, Illinois.
36.
Adam Mazurkiewicz resides in and owns the home at 399 W. Hillside Drive,
Apartment 3, in Bensenville, Illinois.

37.
Leonarda Gonzalez resides in and owns the home at 875 W. Hillside Drive in
38.
Malgorzata Labedz resides in and owns the home at 260 Mohawk Drive in
39.
Marcin and Agnieszka Danewicz reside in and own the home at 230 N. Walnut
Street, Apartment D, in Bensenville, Illinois.

40.
Dolores Daily resides in and owns the home at 231 Mohawk Drive in Bensenville,
Illinois.
41.
Herb Weigelt resides in and owns the home at 262 Mohawk Drive in Bensenville,
Illinois.
42.
Zbigniew Jakubowski resides in and owns the home at 237 N. Walnut Street in
43.
Ken Lestina resides in and owns the home at 1112 Nordic Street in Bensenville,
Illinois.
44.
Adam and Barbara Krajewski reside in and own the home at 310 Marshall Road in
45.
Jozef Antal and Marta Antalova reside in and own 379 W. Hillside Drive,
Apartment 4, in Bensenville, Illinois.

46.
Urszula Niemirski resides in and owns the home at 221 N. Walnut Street in
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 7 of 14
47.
John and Sherri Finnegan reside in and own the home at 250 Tioga Avenue in
48.
Godofredo Victorino resides in and owns the home at 533 Marshall Road in
49.
Dariusz Klepacki resides in and owns the home at 702 W. Hillside Drive in
Bensenville Illinois.
50.
Henry Hammacher resides in and owns the home at 237 N. Church Road in
51.
Thomas and Joanna Forman reside in and own the home at 697 W. Hillside Drive
52.
Gayle Kurtzrock resides in and owns 236 N. Walnut Street, Apartment A, in
53.
Thomas and Patricia Steffensen reside in and own the home at 225 N. Church Road
54.
Farideh Bruessard resides in and owns the home at 614 W. Hillside Drive in
55.
Nora Porrata resides in and owns 238 N. Walnut Street, Apartment A, in
56.
Sophia Sarnecki resides in and owns 222 N. Walnut Street, Unit A, in Bensenville,
Illinois.
57.
Maksim Manigoda resides in and owns the home at 243 N. Church Road in
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 8 of 14
58.
Benjamin Silva resides in and owns the home at 808 Algonquin Avenue in
59.
Greg Frankowski and Lyudmyla Lugova reside in and own the home at 617 W.
Hillside Drive in Bensenville, Illinois.

60.
Oscar and Maria Madrigal reside in and own the home at 616 W. Hillside Drive in
61.
Celia Hernandez resides in and owns the home at 246 N. Church Road, and is also
the owner of homes on Green Valley Street (1008) and 479 W. Hillside Drive in Bensenville,
Illinois.
62.
James Paganucci resides in and owns the home at 256 Mohawk Drive in
63.
Michael A. Jackson resides in and owns the home at 212 Mohawk Drive in
64.
Antoni Chrzanowski resides in and owns the home at 238 Poppy Lane in
65.
Mike and Vera Natiello reside in and own the home at 1004 Green Valley Street,
and they are also the owners of the home at 1006 Green Valley Street in Bensenville, Illinois.
66.
Oronzo and Concetta Peconio, reside in and own the home at 1001
Glendale.
Defendant
67.
The Defendant, City of Chicago, is a municipal corporation.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 9 of 14
68.
In and prior to the Fall of 2013, the City informed the Residents of its intention to
open the Runway. The City publicly assured the Residents that this new runway would not have
a material impact upon their lives, property, or neighborhoods. The City also repeatedly assured
the Residents that the volume of air traffic would not be significant, and that it would not be
disruptive.
69.
The Citys assurances were and remain untrue.
70.
The passage of time has revealed that hundreds of large, loud commercial aircraft
now use the Runway on a daily basis.

71.
These planes land and takeoff beginning in the early morning hours each day (i.e.,
4:00 or 5:00 a.m.), and continue until the very late evening hours -- up to and including midnight
-- and oftentimes even continue past midnight until 2:00 or 3:00 a.m. the next morning.
72.
Moreover, the planes regularly using the Runway to land and takeoff include
jumbo, cargo, Cessna, and the largest of commercial aircrafts.
73.
As the aircraft approach the Runway, they often come in anywhere from below 100
to 200 feet in altitude and generally, if not always, less than 500 feet above the ground. The planes
literally roar down the Residents neighborhood streets and/or directly over their homes. It is a
scene that must be observed to be believed.
74.
In fact, the Village of Bensenville has trimmed back trees belonging to, and in the
yards of, certain Residents so as to not obstruct or impede the low flight path of the planes coming
in for landings on the Runway.
75.
The Village of Bensenville has even removed a grammar school, entirely, from the
flight path of the Runway, acknowledging the danger, nuisance, and distraction posed to the
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 10 of 14
Residents children.
76.
There was an incident where an engine or other large aircraft part fell off one of the
aircraft and landed in the Village of Bensenvilles swimming pool. Had the pool been occupied
at the time, a number of deaths would have certainly resulted.
77.
The planes utilizing the Runway to land also routinely create a vortext effect in
connection with the hundreds if not thousands of landings a week. In other words, a short time
after each plane roars through the Residents neighborhood a significant wind or blowback is
created that creates a whooshing and blowing effect for a period of time after each and every
landing.
78.
The cumulative impact to date that the City use of the Runway has had upon the
Residents is virtually impossible to adequately describe in words.

exaggeration, it has wreaked havoc upon their daily lives.
79.
The Residents sleep is and has been regularly interrupted.
10
In short, and without
80.
The Residents suffer from a constant uneasy feeling -- based upon the combination
of the volume, sound, and close proximity of the planes utilizing the Runway -- that is, or is attune
to, a stress disorder.
81.
The noise levels created by the planes utilizing the Runway are at harmful and
unacceptable levels.
82.
The Residents ability to enjoy the normal use of their homes, inside and out, has
been destroyed.
83.
The Residents are no longer able to enjoy the normal and expected use of their
porches, yards, patios, driveways, and sidewalks including for recreation, entertainment,
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 11 of 14
pleasure, or contemplation. Even gardening has been severely compromised or eliminated because
of the effects of the toxins and pollution upon them.
84.
Inside the Residents homes, things are not much better.
85.
The City has confiscated the Residents private property and the interests therein.
86.
The Residents children cannot enjoy normal childhoods and childhood activities
in and about the affected properties and homes.

87.
The Residents family and home life is in constant stress and distress because of
sleep interruption and deprivation caused by the planes use of the Runway.
88.
The planes utilizing the Runway have also, inter alia, caused vibrations to the
Residents homes; caused shingles to come loose; left an oily residue on their homes and property;
caused cracking of walls, ceilings, windows, and foundations; caused leaking roofs; caused ceiling
fans to come loose; resulted in soaring electric bills (due to the Residents inability to open
windows because of the excessive and constant noise); caused intermittent loss of cell phone and
internet connectivity; and caused intermittent loss of electricity.
11
89.
As a direct and proximate result of all of the foregoing, the City has dramatically
and negatively forever altered the lives of the Residents, and has caused their homes to plummet
in value and to be undesirable, unusable, and unsafe.
90.
The Residents repeated entreaties to Governmental and elected officials have been
unanswered.
91.
The Residents were in their homes before the City began its operation of the
Runway. They are legally entitled to the normal use and enjoyment of their homes and property.
92.
The City should not be allowed to take their private property for public use without
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 12 of 14
just compensation as determined by a jury.

COUNT I
(Inverse Condemnation)
93.
The Plaintiff Residents, re-allege, as though fully set forth herein, Paragraphs 1
through 92 above, as Paragraph 93 of Count I of their Complaint.

94.
The Citys actions, as described above, and the impact upon the Residents,
constitute an unconstitutional taking of the Residents private property.

95.
The City has not provided just compensation to the Residents for this taking.
96.
The noise and other interference from the regular, frequent and persistent flights to
and from the Runway, and directly over and in close proximity to the Residents homes and
properties, has substantially interfered with the use and enjoyment of them, has substantially
diminished the value of Residents homes and property and otherwise damaged the Residents
private property.
97.
The substantial interference with the use and enjoyment, and the diminution in
value of the Residents homes and property constitutes a taking of the Residents private property
for public use by the Defendant City of Chicago and for its benefit.
12
98.
The Residents are entitled to just compensation as determined by a jury for the
value of the property taken and the diminution in value to the remaining property not taken.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, respectfully request
the entry of an Order granting judgment in their favor and against the Defendant, City of Chicago,
in an amount to be proven at trial but in excess of the jurisdictional minimum for an action to be
filed in this Department of the Court, representing the fair market value of each and every one of
their homes and properties prior to the deprivation caused by the Defendant; for their relocation
expenses; for their fees and costs; for all relief to which they are otherwise entitled; and for such
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 13 of 14
other and further relief as is appropriate under the circumstance.

COUNT II
(Unjust Enrichment)
99.
The Plaintiff Residents, re-allege, as though fully set forth herein, Paragraphs 1
through 92 above, as Paragraph 99 of Count II of their Complaint.

100.
The City has directly and proximately received a benefit by way of its improper
taking and use of the Residents property.

101.
The City derives a substantial monetary and economic benefit from its use and
taking of the Residents property, including but not limited to, monies earned from the owners of
the aircraft that use the Runway.
102.
It would be unjust and inequitable to allow the City to use and take the Residents
property without compensation to the Residents.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, respectfully request
the entry of an Order granting judgment in their favor and against the Defendant, City of Chicago,
in an amount to be proven at trial but in excess of the jurisdictional minimum for an action to be
filed in this Department of the Court, representing the amount that the Defendant City of Chicago
13
has been unjustly enriched at the expense of and to the detriment of the Plaintiff Residents; for
their fees and costs; for all relief to which they are otherwise entitled; and for such other and further
relief as is appropriate under the circumstance.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
10/1/2015 8:30 AM
2015-L-009955
PAGE 14 of 14
By:
s/Michael I. Leonard
Counsel for the Plaintiffs/Residents
LEONARDMEYER LLP
Michael Irving Leonard
Derek J. Meyer
Ethan E. White
203 North LaSalle, Suite 1620
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 380-6559 (phone)
(312) 264-0671 (fax)
mleonard@leonardmeyerllp.com
Dated: October 1, 2015
14

Bensenville O&#39;Hare Lawsuit

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Bensenville O&#39;Hare Lawsuit

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

CASE NO. _________________

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Plaintiffs (hereinafter Plaintiffs or Residents), by and through their undersigned

former locations of the demolished Bensenville properties.

to the opening of the Runway.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Apartment 3, in Bensenville, Illinois.

Street, Apartment D, in Bensenville, Illinois.

Apartment 4, in Bensenville, Illinois.

Gayle Kurtzrock resides in and owns 236 N. Walnut Street, Apartment A, in

Nora Porrata resides in and owns 238 N. Walnut Street, Apartment A, in

Hillside Drive in Bensenville, Illinois.

The Defendant, City of Chicago, is a municipal corporation.

The Citys assurances were and remain untrue.

now use the Runway on a daily basis.

jumbo, cargo, Cessna, and the largest of commercial aircrafts.

Residents is virtually impossible to adequately describe in words.

The Residents sleep is and has been regularly interrupted.

In short, and without

Inside the Residents homes, things are not much better.

in and about the affected properties and homes.

just compensation as determined by a jury.

through 92 above, as Paragraph 93 of Count I of their Complaint.

constitute an unconstitutional taking of the Residents private property.

other and further relief as is appropriate under the circumstance.

through 92 above, as Paragraph 99 of Count II of their Complaint.

taking and use of the Residents property.

property without compensation to the Residents.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Dated: October 1, 2015

Anda mungkin juga menyukai

Bensenville O'Hare Lawsuit

Bensenville O'Hare Lawsuit