Anda di halaman 1dari 2

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules 57805

airplanes that are type-certificated for 13132. This proposed AD would not from contact with the bottom folding
operation in the United States under the have a substantial direct effect on the mechanism.
provisions of section 21.29 of the States, on the relationship between the Compliance
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR national Government and the States, or (e) You are responsible for having the
21.29) and the applicable bilateral on the distribution of power and actions required by this AD performed within
airworthiness agreement. In keeping responsibilities among the various the compliance times specified unless the
with this bilateral airworthiness levels of government. actions have already been done.
agreement, the DGAC kept us informed For the reasons discussed above, I
Installing Protective Fairings
of the situation described above. We certify that the proposed regulation:
have examined the DGAC’s findings, 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory (f) Within 90 days after the effective date
reviewed all available information, and action’’ under Executive Order 12866; of this AD, install two protective fairings,
part number (P/N) 160100–49, on each
determined that AD action is necessary 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
affected cabin attendant seat. Use the
for products of this type design that are DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures instructions in paragraph 2 of Sicma Aeroseat
certificated for operation in the United (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and Service Bulletin 150–25–036, Issue 1, dated
States. For this reason, we are proposing 3. Would not have a significant October 2, 1999, and Sicma Aeroseat Service
this AD, which would require installing economic impact, positive or negative, Bulletin 151–25–037, Issue 1, dated October
two protective fairings on each affected on a substantial number of small entities 2, 1999.
cabin attendant seat and replacing the under the criteria of the Regulatory (g) After installing the fairings, add or
existing identification placard with a Flexibility Act. complete a modification placard, part
We prepared a regulatory evaluation number (P/N) 00–5179, indicating that the
new one. The proposed AD would service bulletin has been completed. Use the
require you to use the service of the estimated costs to comply with
instructions in paragraph 3 of Sicma Aeroseat
information described previously to this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES Service Bulletin 150–25–036, Issue 1, dated
perform these actions. section for a location to examine the October 2, 1999, and Sicma Aeroseat Service
regulatory evaluation. Bulletin 151–25–037, Issue 1, dated October
Costs of Compliance 2, 1999.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
There are about 5,584 Sicma Aero
Alternative Methods of Compliance
Seat (formerly Farner) cabin attendant Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
(AMOCs)
seats, series 150 type FN and 151 type safety, Safety.
(h) The Manager, Boston Aircraft
WN of the affected design installed on The Proposed Amendment Certification Office, has the authority to
698 airplanes of U.S. registry. We approve alternative methods of compliance
estimate that it would take about 3 work Under the authority delegated to me
for this AD if requested using the procedures
hours per airplane to perform the by the Administrator, the Federal found in 14 CFR 39.19.
proposed actions, and that the average Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: Related Information
labor rate is $65 per work hour. Sicma
has advised us that they will supply the (i) DGAC airworthiness directive 1999–004
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS (AB), dated January 13, 1999, also addresses
modification kits at no cost. Based on
DIRECTIVES the subject of this AD.
the labor rate to install the kits, the total
cost of the proposed AD to U.S. 1. The authority citation for part 39 Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
operators will be $138,110. continues to read as follows: September 26, 2005.
Francis A. Favara,
Authority for This Rulemaking Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Title 49 of the United States Code § 39.13 [Amended] Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding [FR Doc. 05–19873 Filed 10–3–05; 8:45 am]
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, the following new airworthiness BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Section 106, describes the authority of directive:
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more Sicma Aero Seat (formerly Farner): Docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
No. FAA–2005–22109; Directorate
detail the scope of the Agency’s Identifier 2005–NE–32–AD.
authority. Federal Aviation Administration
We are issuing this rulemaking under Comments Due Date
the authority described in Subtitle VII, (a) The Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, (FAA) must receive comments on this [Docket No. FAA–2005–22496; Airspace
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that airworthiness directive (AD) action by Docket No. 04–ANM–26]
section, Congress charges the FAA with December 5, 2005.
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in RIN 2120–AA66
Affected ADs
air commerce by prescribing regulations (b) None. Proposed Amendment to Jet Route
for practices, methods, and procedures
Applicability J–158; ID
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation (c) This AD is applies to Sicma Aero Seat AGENCY: Federal Aviation
is within the scope of that authority (formerly Farner) cabin attendant seat series Administration (FAA), DOT.
because it addresses an unsafe condition 150 type FN and 151 type WN, all part and ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
that is likely to exist or develop on serial numbers. These attendant seats are
(NPRM).
products identified in this rulemaking installed on, but not limited to, Airbus A319,
A320 and A321 series airplanes. SUMMARY: This action proposes to revise
action.
Unsafe Condition a segment of Jet Route J–158 between
Regulatory Findings the Malad City, ID, Very High
(d) This proposed AD results from a child
We have determined that this catching its fingers in the folding mechanism Frequency Omni-directional Range/
proposed AD would not have federalism of the bottom of the attendant seat. We are Distance Measuring Equipment (VOR/
implications under Executive Order issuing this AD to prevent injury resulting DME) and the Muddy Mountain, WY,

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:03 Oct 03, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM 04OCP1
57806 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules

Very High Frequency Omni-directional taking action on the proposed rule. The The FAA has determined that this
Range/Tactical Air Navigation proposal contained in this action may proposed regulation only involves an
(VORTAC). Specifically, the FAA is be changed in light of comments established body of technical
proposing to realign the route from received. All comments submitted will regulations for which frequent and
Malad City, ID, to Big Piney, WY, VOR/ be available for examination in the routine amendments are necessary to
DME to Muddy Mountain, WY. This public docket both before and after the keep them operationally current.
proposed action would replace the closing date for comments. A report Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1)
sector taken out of service, reduce summarizing each substantive public Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
controller workload, and enhance the contact with FAA personnel concerned under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
National Airspace System. with this rulemaking will be filed in the a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
DATES: Comments must be received on docket. Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
or before November 18, 2005. Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
Availability of NPRMs
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
proposal to the Docket Management An electronic copy of this document warrant preparation of a regulatory
System, U.S. Department of may be downloaded through the evaluation as the anticipated impact is
Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. Recently so minimal. Since this is a routine
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC published rulemaking documents can matter that will only affect air traffic
20590–0001. You must identify the FAA also be accessed through the FAA’s Web procedures and air navigation, it is
Docket No. FAA–2005–22496 and page at http://www.faa.gov or the certified that this proposed rule, when
Airspace Docket No. 04–ANM–26 at the Federal Register’s Web page at http:// promulgated, will not have a significant
beginning of your comments. You may www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html. economic impact on a substantial
also submit comments through the You may review the public docket number of small entities under the
Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. containing the proposal, any comments criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken received, and any final disposition in List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
McElroy, Airspace and Rules, Office of person in the Dockets Office (see
System Operations Airspace and AIM, ADDRESSES section for address and Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5 Navigation (air).
Independence Avenue, SW., p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. An informal docket The Proposed Amendment
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)
267–8783. may also be examined during normal In consideration of the foregoing, the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
business hours at the office of the Federal Aviation Administration
Regional Air Traffic Division, Federal proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
Comments Invited Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind follows:
Interested parties are invited to Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
participate in this proposed rulemaking 98055–4056. PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
by submitting such written data, views, Persons interested in being placed on B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
or arguments, as they may desire. a mailing list for future NPRMs should TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
Comments that provide the factual basis call the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, REPORTING POINTS
supporting the views and suggestions (202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory
presented are particularly helpful in Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 1. The authority citation for part 71
developing reasoned regulatory Rulemaking Distribution System, which continues to read as follows:
decisions on the proposal. Comments describes the application procedure. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
are specifically invited on the overall History 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 1963 Comp., p. 389.
environmental, and energy-related The segment of J–158 between the
aspects of the proposal. Malad City VOR/DME and the Muddy § 71.1 [Amended]
Communications should identify both Mountain VORTAC was found to be 2. The incorporation by reference in
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– unusable for navigation and was taken 14 CFR 71.1 of the FAA Order 7400.9N,
2005–22496 and Airspace Docket No. out of service indefinitely. The FAA has Airspace Designations and Reporting
04–ANM–26) and be submitted in issued a Flight Data Center Notices to Points, dated September 1, 2005, and
triplicate to the Docket Management Airmen (NOTAM) advising users of this effective September 15, 2005, is
System (see ADDRESSES section for problem. To provide a means of amended as follows:
address and phone number). You may navigating between the Malad City, ID,
also submit comments through the VOR/DME and Muddy Mountain, WY, Paragraph 2004 Jet Routes.
Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. VORTAC, the FAA is issuing the
* * * * *
Commenters wishing the FAA to following proposal.
acknowledge receipt of their comments J–158 [Revised]
The Proposal
on this action must submit with those From Mina, NV, via Lucin, UT; Malad City,
comments a self-addressed, stamped The FAA is proposing an amendment ID; Big Piney, WY; Muddy Mountain, WY;
postcard on which the following to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Rapid City, SD; to Aberdeen, SD.
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to (14 CFR) part 71 to revise a segment of * * * * *
Docket No. FAA–2005–22496 and J–158. The proposed amendment would
Issued in Washington, DC, September 22,
Airspace Docket No. 04–ANM–26.’’ The insert a segment extending from Malad
2005.
postcard will be date/time stamped and City, ID, VOR/DME to Big Piney, WY,
VOR/DME to Muddy Mountain, WY, Edith V. Parish,
returned to the commenter.
All communications received on or VORTAC. This amendment would Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules.
before the specified closing date for restore the use of J–158 between Malad [FR Doc. 05–19856 Filed 10–3–05; 8:45 am]
comments will be considered before City and Muddy Mountain. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:03 Oct 03, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM 04OCP1