Law
and
Administra*ve
Agencies
Alberto
C.
Agra
Ateneo
Law
School
May
1,
2015
Administra*ve
Law
Deni*on:
All
the
laws
that
regulate
or
control
the
administra<ve
organiza<on
and
opera<ons
of
the
government
Classica*ons:
1. Internal
and
External
Administra<on
2. Law
that
Controls
and
those
made
by
Administra<ve
Agencies
3. Substan<ve
or
Procedural
Administra<ve
Law
4. General
or
Special
Administra<ve
Law
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
Crea*on
of
AAs
1. Cons<tu<on
2. Congress
(Law;
GOCCs
economically
viable
and
common
good;
LGUs
-
plebiscite)
3. President
(Execu<ve
Order;
by
authority
under
the
Cons<tu<on
or
of
law)
4. Supreme
Court
(determines
classica<on)
5. Administra<ve
Agencies
themselves
(Ar<cles
of
Incorpora<on;
by
authority
of
law)
6. Local
Governments
(Ordinance;
by
authority
of
law)
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
Government
Bureaucracy
o Administra<ve
Agency/
Government
Agencies
o GOCCs
(original
charter/
chartered)
o GOCCs
(special
charter/
non-chartered)
o Government
Instrumentali<es
o Government
Financial
Ins<tu<on
o Public
Corpora<on
o Public
Oces
o Na<onal
Government
Agency
o Quasi-Corpora<on
o Quasi-Public
Corpora<on
o Municipal
Corpora<on
Proper/
Local
Government
Unit
o Quasi-Municipal
Corpora<on
GOCC
vs.
GI
GOCC
GI
1. Organized
as
stock
or
non-stock
corpora<on
2. Public
character
of
its
func<on
3. Government
ownership
over
the
same
4. Created
by
law
or
under
Corpora<on
Code
Recent
Jurisprudence
En*ty
Characteriza*on
Manila
Interna<onal
Airport
Authority
Veterans
Federa<on
of
the
Philippines
Philippine
Fisheries
Development
Authority
GI
since
not
integrated
within
the
department
framework
but
is
an
agency
adached
to
the
DTI
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
Rules
1. All
AAs
are
POs,
not
all
POs
are
AAs
(e.g.
Congress,
Courts)
2. All
AAs
are
GAs,
All
GAs
are
AAs
(under
GCG
Act)
3. All
PCs
are
AAs,
not
all
AAs
are
not
PCs
(e.g.
Departments,
GIs
and
Commissions)
4. GOCCs
are
Corpora<ons,
GIs
are
not;
GOCCs
cannot
be
GIs
(except
BSP)
5. GOCCs,
not
GIs,
must
meet
twin
cons<tu<onal
test
of
economic
viability
and
ownership/
control
6. There
are
chartered
and
non-chartered
GOCCs
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
Rules
7. All
Quasi-Corpora<ons
are
GOCCs,
All
GOCCs
are
Quasi-Corpora<ons;
GIs
are
not
QCs
since
they
are
not
corpora<ons
8. GOCC-GI
dis<nc<on
maders:
a. Local
taxa<on
(PFDA
and
MIAA)
b. COA
jurisdic<on
(BSP,
WD
and
MECO)
c. Rela<onship
either
adachment,
control
or
supervision
(VFP
and
BSP)
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
6. Rela<onships
7. Jurisdic<on
8. Structure
9. Budget
10.Dissolu<on
10
Characteris*cs
of
AAs
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Size
Specializa<on/
Func<ons
Territory
Responsibility
for
Results
Variety
of
Administra<ve
Du<es
Delegated
Authori<es
Accountability
Rela<onships
Capitaliza<on/
Funding
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
11
Types
of
AAs
1.
2.
3.
4.
12
Administra*ve
Rela*onship
Areas:
policies,
opera<ons,
budget,
decisions,
day-
to-day,
policy
and
program
coordina<on
Types:
1. Supervision
and
Control
(subs5tute
judgment;
rules
on
how
to
execute
act;
alter-ego;
e.g.
President
and
DOTC)
2. Administra<ve
Supervision
(oversight,
reports,
proper
performance;
not
over
appointments
and
contracts,
not
reverse
decisions;
e.g.
Department
and
Regulatory
Agencies;
Province
and
Component
City)
3. Adachment
(sit
in
Board;
repor5ng;
not
day-to-day;
e.g.
DPWH
and
MWSS)
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
13
Powers
AAs
possess
Delegated,
not
Inherent,
Powers
Subordinate,
not
Superior,
to
Enabling
Instrument
Liberal,
not
Strict,
Interpreta<on
of
Powers
AAs
cannot
prohibit
what
law
does
not
prohibit
Basic
Powers
1. Inves<ga<ve
2. Rule-Making
or
Quasi-Legisla<ve
3. Adjudica<ve
or
Quasi-Judicial
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
14
Delega*on
of
Powers
Potestas
delegata
non
potest
delegari
Excep<ons:
President
tari
and
emergency
Local
Governments
Peoples
Ini<a<ve
Administra<ve
Agencies
15
Inves*ga*ve
Powers
partakes
of
judicial
discre<on,
not
judicial
func<on
Express
Grant
Express
or
Implied
1. Contempt
1. Clearance
2. Subpoena
2. Fact-Finding
3. Search
3. Ocular
Inspec<on
(Presence
of
counsel
4. Visitorial
not
required)
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
16
Rule-Making
Deni<on:
Power
to
Issue
Rules/
Fill
in
details/
How
(notWhat)
a
Law
will
be
implemented
Nature:
Inferior/
Subordinate,
i.e.,
cannot
change,
amend
or
conict
with
charter
or
law
Ra<onale:
1.
2.
3.
4.
17
Rule-Making
Eects
1. Force
and
eect
of
law
2. Interpreta<ons
persuasive
(not
controlling)
3. Presumed
legal
and
cons<tu<onal
4. Opera<ve
eect
5. Subject
to
judicial
review
6. Subject
to
repeal
and
amendment
7. Prospec<ve
applica<on
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
18
Rule-Making
Requisites
1. Authority:
by
authority
of
law
2. Substance:
not
contrary
to
law
3. Procedure:
properly
promulgated;
publica<on
and
hearing,
if
required
by
law
4. Issuer:
Issued
by
proper
authority
5. Standard:
Reasonable
o
o
o
o
Rela<on
to
purpose
Supported
by
good
reasons
Not
arbitrary
Free
from
legal
inrmi<es
19
Grant
Publica1on
Supplementary
Required
Interpreta*ve
Express
(E)
or
Implied
(I)
E
or
I
Not Required
Con*ngent
Required
Penal
Required
Procedural
E or I
Required
Internal
E or I
Not Required
20
Rule
Abolishes
Liberalizes
Requirements
Imposes
Requirement
Alters/
Deletes
Requirement
Adds/
Deletes
Requirement
Discriminates/
Classies
Expands
Applica<on
Changes
Period
Discon<nues
Prac<ce
Grant Power
Nullies
Power
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
21
Quasi-Judicial
Power
Grant
of
Power:
Express
Deni<on:
Deciding
controversies,
resolving
conic<ng
claims
and
posi<ons
Extent:
Typically,
only
ques<ons
of
fact
(ques<ons
of
law
or
mixed
if
expressly
permided
under
the
Charter/
law)
Limita<on:
Subject
to
Judicial
Review
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
22
23
Quasi-Legisla*ve
or
-Judicial
1. Applica<on
for
rate
increase
by
a
par<cular
public
u<lity
(QJ)
2. Increase
rates
for
all
buses
(QL)
3. Sepng
qualica<on
standards
(QL)
4. Disqualifying
a
candidate
(QJ)
5. Procedures
for
applying
for
a
franchise
(QL)
6. Revoking
a
specic
franchise
(QJ)
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
24
Quasi-Judicial
Quasi-Legisla1ve
Grant
E or I
Par<es
Par<cular
All/ Sectors
Adversarial
Yes
No
Controversy
Exists
None
Required
Primary/
Exhaus<on
Applicable
Not Applicable
Time
Past/ Present
Future
Publica<on
Not Required
Depends
Res Judicata
Applicable
Not Applicable
25
Administra*ve
Proceedings
Character:
Adversarial,
quasi-judicial,
civil
Jurisdic<on:
Dened
by
Law/
Charter
(not
by
AA
or
par<es)
Nature:
Power
to
Adjudicate
Not
Delegable
(power
to
hear/
receive
evidence
can
be
delegated)
Due
Process
(DINA):
Decision,
Impar<al
Tribunal,
No<ce
and
Appear/
Defend
Procedure:
reasonable,
due
process,
meet
ends,
published
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
26
Administra*ve
Proceedings
No<ce
and
Hearing
o Required
(actual
or
construc<ve)
o Subject
to
waiver
and
estoppel
o Curable
(i.e.,
subsequently
heard,
ling
of
mo<on
of
reconsidera<on,
oral
arguments)
o Posi<on
papers
allowed
o Not
required
when
privilege,
abatement,
condi<onal
right,
legisla<ve
or
administra<ve
27
Administra*ve
Proceedings
Evidence
oSubstan<al
(unless
law
provides
dierent
quantum)
oOcular
allowed
(when
relevant)
oAdop<on
of
reports
allowed
28
Administra*ve
Findings
AA
ndings
are
not
conclusive
and
nal
before
courts
Given
weight,
not
disturbed
unless:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
29
Judicial
Review
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Cer<orari
Prohibi<on
Injunc<on
Mandamus
Declaratory
Relief
Appeal
30
Scenarios
Higher/
Level
2
AA
Lower/
Level
1
1.
2.
3.
4.
Courts
31
o
o
o
o
interlocutory
orders
protect
rights
violate
Cons<tu<on
excessive
use
of
power
32
33
Excep*ons:
Non-Exhaus*on
JPLCS
Ques<ons
essen<ally
Judicial
Administra<ve
Remedy
is
Permissive
Pure
ques<on
of
Law
Cons<tu<onality
Small
amount
that
exhaus<on
will
be
costly
DRIED
Uder
disregard
for
Due
Process
No
plain
speedy
Remedy
Strong
public
Interest
Estoppel
Con<nued
and
unreasonable
Delay
34
Excep*ons:
Non-Exhaus*on
DARN
Irreparable
Damage
by
party
Alter
Ego
Bears
approval
of
President
No
administra<ve
Review
is
provided
Insistence
on
exhaus<on
will
lead
to
Nullica<on
of
claim
CLRNT
Civil
ac<on
for
damages
Land
not
part
of
public
domain
Special
Reasons
demanding
immediate
judicial
relief
No
Decision
rendered
Transcendental
issues
35
Finality
of
Admin
.Ac*on
AA
not
yet
nal
(pending)
Primary Jurisdic*on
Concurrent
AA
and
AA
process
(all
levels)
not
st
court;
AA
1
instance
yet
completed
W/ excep<ons
Yes
Excep<ons
Interlocutory
Preserve
status
quo
Protect
rights
Violate
Cons<tu<on
Great
damage
Excess
power
Applicability
QJ
Non-Exhaus*on
of
Admin.
Remedies
No
controversy
(future,
imaginary,
remote)
Await
mader
to
become
real/
present
or
imminent
Process
complete
at
1
level,
not
elevate
to
next
level,
then
le
with
court
Pending
or
no
pending
AA
case
Yes
Judicial
discre<on
Ques<on
lf
law
AA
has
no
jurisdic<on
Yes
Pure
ques<on
of
law
Transcendental
issue
Cons<tu<onal
issue
No
adequate
remedy
Alter-ego
Public
interest
QJ
Administra<ve
Law
Reviewer,
Agra
QJ
No
None
(Declaratory
Relief)
QJ
and
QL
36
37