Anda di halaman 1dari 1

44554 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

148 / Wednesday, August 3, 2005 / Notices

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our considers the effects of, and alternatives comment period. The remaining 23
estimate of the burden of the collection to, the release of a nonindigenous leaf commenters raised issues concerning
of information, including the validity of beetle, Diorhabda elongata, into the water usage, endangered and protected
the methodology and assumptions used; environment to reduce the severity of species considerations, additional
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and saltcedar infestations. The saltcedar eradication options, and
clarity of the information to be environmental assessment provides a projected results. We have taken the
collected; and basis for our conclusion that the release issues raised by the 23 commenters into
(4) Minimize the burden of the into the environment of the biological consideration in formulating our final
collection of information on those who control agent will not present a risk of environmental assessment.
are to respond, through use, as introducing plant pests into the United The environmental assessment and
appropriate, of automated, electronic, States or disseminating plant pests finding of no significant impact may be
mechanical, and other collection within the United States and will not viewed on the Internet at http://
technologies; e.g., permitting electronic have a significant impact on the quality www.aphis.usda.gov/ppd/es/
submission of responses. of the human environment. Based on its sltcedr.html. You may request paper
Estimate of burden: The public findings of no significant impact, the copies of the environmental assessment
reporting burden for this collection of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and finding of no significant impact by
information is estimated to average Service has determined that an calling or writing to the person listed
0.3341847 hours per response. environmental impact statement need under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Respondents: U.S. importers of fruits not be prepared. CONTACT. Please refer to the title of the
and vegetables, foreign plant protection ADDRESSES: Copies of the environmental environmental assessment and finding
authorities, individuals involved in assessment and finding of no significant of no significant impact when
growing, packing, handling, impact are available for public requesting copies. The environmental
transporting, and exporting plants and inspection in our reading room. The assessment and finding of no significant
plant products. reading room is located in room 1141 of impact are also available for review in
Estimated annual number of the USDA South Building, 14th Street our reading room (information on the
respondents: 90,781. and Independence Avenue, SW., location and hours of the reading room
Estimated annual number of is listed under the heading ADDRESSES at
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
responses per respondent: 2.9583062. the beginning of this notice).
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
Estimated annual number of The environmental assessment and
through Friday, except holidays. To be
responses: 268,558. finding of no significant impact have
Estimated total annual burden on sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before been prepared in accordance with: (1)
respondents: 89,748 hours. (Due to The National Environmental Policy Act
averaging, the total annual burden hours coming.
You may view APHIS documents (NEPA) of 1969, (2) as amended (43
may not equal the product of the annual U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), regulations of the
published in the Federal Register and
number of responses multiplied by the Council on Environmental Quality for
related information on the Internet at
reporting burden per response.) implementing the procedural provisions
All responses to this notice will be http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppd/rad/
webrepor.html. of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3)
summarized and included in the request USDA regulations implementing NEPA
for OMB approval. All comments will FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
also become a matter of public record. William Kauffman, Western Region Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of
Program Manager, PPQ, APHIS, 2150 372).
July 2005. Centre Avenue Building B, Fort Collins,
CO 80526–8117; (970) 494–7565. Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of
Elizabeth E. Gaston, July 2005 .
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Health Inspection Service. Background Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
[FR Doc. 05–15288 Filed 8–2–05; 8:45 am] Health Inspection Service.
On December 19, 2003, we published
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
in the Federal Register (68 FR 70755– [FR Doc. 05–15287 Filed 8–2–05; 8:45 am]
70756, Docket No. 03–110–1) a notice BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
advising the public that a draft
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
environmental assessment had been
prepared by the Animal and Plant DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Food Safety and Inspection Service
relative to the release of a
[Docket No. 03–110–2] nonindigenous leaf beetle, Diorhabda [Docket No. 05–027N]
elongata, into the environment to
Saltcedar; Availability of an reduce the severity of saltcedar Public Meeting on Advances in Pre-
Environmental Assessment and (Tamarix spp.) infestations, a major Harvest Reduction of Salmonella in
Finding of No Significant Impact weed pest of watercourses and riparian Poultry
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health habitats. AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection
Inspection Service, USDA. We solicited comments on the draft Service.
ACTION: Notice. environmental assessment for 30 days, ACTION: Notice.
ending January 20, 2004. We received
SUMMARY: We are advising the public 37 comments by that date. The SUMMARY: The Food Safety and
that the Animal and Plant Health comments were from researchers, State Inspection Service (FSIS) is announcing
Inspection Service has prepared an plant organizations, individuals, and that it will hold a public meeting on
environmental assessment relative to industry groups. Of the comments Advances in Pre-Harvest Reduction of
the control of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.). received, 13 were supportive and 1 was Salmonella in Poultry on August 25 and
The environmental assessment a request for an extension of the August 26, 2005, in Athens, GA. The

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:22 Aug 02, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1

Anda mungkin juga menyukai