Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
17.05.2007
Hostapur SAS
Secondary Alkane Sulfonate
< C13 n-Paraffin
max. 1%
min. 59%
max. 39%
max. 1%
Application Laboratory
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
R-SO3H + H2SO4
SO2 O2 n-paraffin
Reaction
n-paraffin
H2O
H2O
Rectification
SAS 93%
H2O
Separation
SO2 O2 n-paraffin
George Nunes
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
March 2007
Slide 3
Neutralization
NaOH
SAS 60%
Hostapur SAS
SAS 26
Molecular Weight g/mol
Hostapur SAS 26
328
25.0 27.0
29.2 30.8
59.0 61.0
Sodium Sulfate
Max. 1.9%
Max. 2.1%
Max. 4.0%
Paraffin
Max. 0.4%
Max. 0.4%
Max. 0.5%
Appearance 25C
Liquid
Liquid
Paste
Color
Slightly Yellow
Slightly Yellow
Slightly Yellow
Preservation
Without
Preservative
With
Preservative
Without
Preservative
Hostapur SAS 60
Slide 4
SAS 60
% active matter
Hostapur SAS 30
Karine Framesqui
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
SAS 30
Slide 5
Next
George Nunes
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
March 2007
Slide 6
Back
Slide 7
Back
Slide 8
Back
George Nunes
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
March 2007
Slide 9
Back
Stirring for 1 h
Centrifugation
George Nunes
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
March 2007
Slide 10
Back
Biodegradability of Hostapur
SAS vs. linear alkyl
benzene sulfonate
According to modified OECD Screening
Test 301 E
George Nunes
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
March 2007
Slide 11
Back
Clariant Suggestion
based on Hostapur SAS
RSC - LATAM
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
17.05.2007
Slide 12
RSC - LATAM
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
17.05.2007
Slide 13
Targets
Total substitution of LAS by Hostapur SAS
Physico-Chemical Characteristcs
pH
6.5
Viscosity
Appearance
Performance
Cleaning Performance At least same as reference
Cost
RSC - LATAM
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
17.05.2007
Slide 14
Cost
Same as reference
Suggestion
All Values (%aw/w)
LASS
Reference
Clariant Suggestion
17.6 % a.m.
16.5
(9.9 % a.m.)
25.9
18.3
(7.0 %a.m.)
(4.9 % a.m.)
Genapol LST
2.5
2.5
(1.0 % a.m.)
(1.0 % a.m.)
Genagen CAB
6.7
Cocamidpropyl betaine
RSC - LATAM
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
17.05.2007
Slide 15
(2.0 % a.m.)
Ethanol
0.3
Urea
3.0
MgCl2.6H2O
2.7
Total Active
25.6
17.8
Relative Cost
1.0
1.0
pH
6.5
6.5
Viscosity*
1200
1100
PT/PR (C)
7/8
<-2
Performance Evaluation
Mini Plate Test - Procedure
Mini-Plate Test
Objective:
To evaluate the performance of
a
dishwashing
detergent,
through a dynamic
foam
generation.
The Test:
Continuous foam generation.
Soiled mini-plates are washed
by hand.
RSC - LATAM
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
17.05.2007
Slide 16
Performance Evaluation
Mini Plate Test - Results
32
Clariant
Suggestion
29
Reference
10
15
20
25
30
35
Test Conditions
RSC - LATAM
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
17.05.2007
Conclusions
Suggestion benefits:
9 Same cost as reference;
9Higher cleaning performance;
9Reduced active content;
9Lower cloud point;
RSC - LATAM
Detergents Business
FUN & LSC Division
17.05.2007
Slide 18