POLLUTED INSULATORS :
A REVIEW OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
June 2000
POLLUTED INSULATORS :
A REVIEW OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
PREPARED BY
Task Force 33.13.01 (formerly 33.04.01)
of Working Group 33.13
(DIELECTRIC STRENGHT OF
INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL INSULATION)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
2.
3.
4.
1999-09-01
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
5.
6.
7.
1999-09-01
II
7.3
SELECTION OF INSULATORS FOR APPLICATION UNDER ICE AND SNOW ....................................................................... 115
7.4
SELECTION OF INSULATORS FOR D.C. ENERGISATION................................................................................................. 116
7.4.1
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 116
7.4.2
Selection of a site severity correction factor.................................................................................................... 116
7.5
INSULATOR POLLUTION DESIGN OF PHASE-TO-PHASE SPACERS ................................................................................ 117
7.5.1
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 117
7.5.2
Design Practice................................................................................................................................................ 117
8.
9.
10.
REFERENCES........................................................................................................................................................... 1 67
1999-09-01
III
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Pollution problem
The performance of insulators used on overhead transmission lines and overhead distribution lines, and in outdoor substations
is a key factor in determining the reliability of power delivery systems. The insulators not only must withstand normal
operating voltage, but also must withstand overvoltages that may cause disturbances, flashovers and line outages. The
reduction in the performance of outdoor insulators occurs mainly by the pollution of the insulating surfaces from air-borne
deposits that may form a conducting or partially conducting surface layer when wet.
The presence of a conducting or partially conducting layer of pollution on the insulator surface will dictate flashover
performance. It is impractical in many situations to prevent the formation of such a layer and consequently insulators must be
designed so that the flashover performance remains high enough to withstand all types of anticipated voltage stresses despite
the presence of the pollution layer. In certain situations where pollution is extremely severe, further preventative or curative
measures - such as periodic washing or greasing - may be necessary.
It is clear that the environment, in which the insulator must operate, together with the insulator itself, will determine the
severity of the pollution layer on the insulator. Translating the environment into parameters that can be used to design the
insulation, therefore, presents one of the fundamental problems in designing external insulation with respect to polluted
conditions. This is due to the vast range of possible conditions such as those found in coastal, industrial, agricultural and
desert areas; also in areas with ice and snow or at high altitude. Combinations of these conditions may also occur. A further
complicating factor is that environments have an inherent statistical behaviour that is to a large extent unpredictable.
Furthermore, the increase of available electrical energy in an area, through the construction of a new substation, may trigger
industrial growth that can contribute to the pollution and affect thus the behaviour of the insulation. It is, therefore, difficult to
quantify the effect of the environment on insulator performance.
This document attempts to address these problems by serving as a review of current knowledge on insulator pollution with the
intention of providing information for the selection and maintenance of insulators in polluted environments. A very extensive
list of references is provided.
It is recognised that ageing may influence the performance of insulators, particularly in the case of polymer insulators.
However, this report is restricted to discussing the pollution performance of insulators, since Cigr Study Committees 15 and
22 are mandated to deal with material and insulator ageing.
1999-09-01
1.4 Insulator types and definitions of Specific Creepage Length & Specific Axial
Length
For the purpose of this document, insulators are divided into the following four broad categories:
1. Ceramic insulators for a.c. systems
2. Polymeric insulators for a.c. systems
3. Ceramic insulators for d.c. systems
4. Polymeric insulators for d.c. systems.
Ceramic insulators have an insulating part manufactured either of glass or porcelain, whereas polymeric insulators have a
composite insulating part consisting of a polymer housing such as Silicone Rubber (SR), Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer
(EPDM) and others, fitted onto a glass fibre core.
In Section 10, details are given of some of the available types of insulators. The tables presented therein are used throughout
this document to identify insulators and provide data for analysis.
For the purpose of this review, the electrical stress over an insulator is considered in two ways; one is related to the leakage
path length and the other to the axial length of the insulator.
In IEC 815, the leakage path of an insulator is specified by the Specific Creepage Distance defined as the leakage distance
of the insulator in mm divided by the maximum system phase-to-phase voltage in kV. The Leakage Distance is defined as the
shortest distance, from on end of the insulator to the other, along the surface of the insulating parts. In this document, the
Specific Creepage Length (SCL) defined as the Leakage Distance of the insulator divided by the actual voltage across the
insulator - i.e. the phase-to-ground voltage in most instances.
The corresponding Specific Axial Length (SAL) of an insulator is defined as the axial length of the insulator divided by the
actual voltage across the insulator. The axial length refers to the shortest distance between fixing points of the live and
1999-09-01
earthed metalware, ignoring the presence of any stress control rings, but including intermediate metal parts along the length of
the insulator - as is shown in Figure 1-1.
Axial Length
Insulator application
Insulator characteristics
Power system parameters
The environment
Constraints.
Field performance
1. The application of the insulator is an important aspect from the pollution performance viewpoint as it determines both
the radial dimension and the orientation of the insulator. Section 3 addresses the application of insulators under a variety of
headings.
2. An integral part of the basic data is the characteristics of the available insulators. These are discussed throughout this
report, but especially in Section 3. Information may also be obtained from manufacturers.
3. Power system parameters that form part of the basic data consist of:
The electrical environment in which the insulator is applied, i.e. a.c. or d.c. voltage; maximum system voltage; and
lightning, switching and temporary overvoltages and their effects on insulator performance. These aspects are
comprehensively addressed in Section 2.2 and Section 3.
The performance required from the insulator. This is determined mainly by power quality criteria such as the power
systems sensitivity to outages.
4. Each environment where the insulators are to be installed has a different set of conditions under which the insulator must
operate reliably. An insulator that has a good performance under one set of conditions might have a bad performance in a
different set of conditions. It is therefore necessary to characterise the environment in terms specific to insulator performance.
In Section 2.3, the environmental aspects and how they affect the pollution flashover process are discussed. Methods to
monitor the environment are described in Section 5.
5. Constraints may also influence the selection of insulators. For example, limitations on the width of the right of way may
dictate the use of structures for which special insulator designs are required. In such cases, the range of available insulators
may be restricted. Cost and the need to minimise the visual impact may also be important factors that have to be built into the
selection process.
6. Field performance of insulators in service is an invaluable source of data for future applications. Unfortunately, these
data are not always available, and, as noted earlier, their applicability to different environments must always be questioned.
Nevertheless, service experience is usually a very important component of the basic data since it forms the basis for
determining whether the selection of a particular insulator leads to acceptable performance. Service experience also may
indicate whether certain artificial pollution tests are appropriate for a specific environment, and it may also contribute
information on insulator characteristics.
1999-09-01
Methods to assess insulator field performance are given in Section 5. References to service experience are given throughout
the document, but especially in Sections 2 and 3.
2) Insulator
Characteristics
3) Power System
parameters
4) Environment
5) Constraints
6) Insulator
field performance
Basic data
Alternative solutions
1) Insulator
application
Field tests
necessary?
No
Yes
Yes
Representative
Test technique
No
Test results
Lab testing
Test results
Insulator
monitoring
Design Procedure
Yes
Deterministic
?
No
Preliminary
Design
Preliminary
Solution
Yes
Cost optimisation
Yes
Identify
measures
Preventative
Measures
?
Acceptable
Failure rate
?
No
No
Insulator selection
Figure 1-2: An overview of the process of insulator selection, as based on a published 6 diagram.
Once these basic data are collected, the various options for insulator selection can be identified for further study. Depending
on whether or not information is available on service experience, insulator characteristics and the environment, the need for
further field tests should be determined. However, it should be noted that these tests normally take 2-4 years. An overview of
the available methods for site severity measurement and field tests is given in Section 5.
Since the time required for field tests is very long, such tests are usually augmented with laboratory tests. A brief overview of
laboratory test methods and some examples of field test stations are given in Section 6.
When the basic data and field and laboratory test results have been compiled, the actual design procedure - as described in
Section 7 - can begin. The choice between a deterministic or statistical approach will depend on the criticality of the design.
Economic and time constraints may dictate a shortened selection procedure with the possible concomitant reduction in
confidence in the design.
In the event that a reliable insulator design is not achieved, mitigation methods may be necessary. Examples of such methods
are given in Section 8.
Improvement in the design procedure requires verification of performance that also will provide further service experience for
future designs.
1999-09-01
The insulator becomes coated with a layer of pollution containing soluble salts or dilute acids or alkalis. If the pollution
is deposited as a layer of liquid electrolyte - e.g. salt spray, stages (c) to (f) may proceed immediately. If the pollution is
non-conducting when dry, some wetting process (stage (b)) is necessary.
b) The surface of the polluted insulator is wetted either completely or partially by fog, mist, light rain, sleet or melting snow
or ice and the pollution layer becomes conductive. Heavy rain is a complicating factor: it may wash away the electrolytic
components off part or all of the pollution layer without initiating the other stages in the breakdown process, or it may by bridging the gaps between sheds - promote flashover.
c)
Once an energised insulator is covered with a conducting pollution layer, a surface leakage current flows and its heating
effect starts to dry out parts of the pollution layer.
d) The drying of the pollution layer is always non-uniform and, in places, the conducting pollution layer becomes broken by
dry bands that interrupt the flow of leakage current.
e)
The line-to-earth voltage is then applied across these dry bands, which may only be a few centimetres wide. It causes air
breakdown to occur and the dry bands are bridged by arcs, which are electrically in series with the resistance of the
undried portion of the pollution layer. A surge of leakage current occurs each time the dry bands on an insulator
sparkover.
f)
If the resistance of the undried part of the pollution layer is low enough, the arcs bridging the dry bands are able to burn
continuously and so may extend along the insulator; thereby spanning more and more of its surface. This in turn
decreases the resistance in series with the arcs, increases the current and permits the arcs to bridge even more of the
insulator surface. Ultimately the insulator is completely spanned and a line-to-earth fault is established.
Figure 2-1: Schematic representation of the pollution flashover process across a hydrophilic surface.
The key processes involved in the flashover process are shown in Figure 2-1. The environment, in which the insulator must
operate in, influences the first two processes - pollution deposit and wetting - whereas electrical aspects govern the last two
processes. This Section, therefore, discusses the flashover process from these two viewpoints.
1999-09-01
To date, no clear description exists of the complete insulator flashover process for insulators with a hydrophobic surface - but
the key aspects, as defined, will still be present to a greater or lesser extent.
The aforementioned points do not include the effects of ice and snow on the electrical strength of insulators. Such additional
points are discussed in provided in Section 2.4.
2.2 Modelling
2.2.1 Hydrophilic surface
It is assumed that, in general, the flashover process across ceramic insulators applies to hydrophilic surfaces - i.e. where this
surface is covered with a film of electrolyte. The models are, therefore, based on the study of an arc in series with a resistance
- representing a dry band arc and a wet polluted surface respectively.
Ea < E p
where
(2-1)
E a is the arc voltage gradient and E p is the mean voltage gradient of the pollution layer.
Eai n = N 0
where
(2-2)
xc =
rp per unit leakage path, the critical arcing distance x c was found to be:
L
n +1
(2-3)
were L is the leakage path length. The corresponding critical voltage Uc was determined as:
Uc = N0
The critical d.c. current
n +1
rp
n +1
(2-4)
ic - i.e. the maximum leakage current not leading to flashover - can be obtained from :
N
ic = o
rp
n +1
(2-5)
Several refinements have been introduced to the d.c. model. In another paper11, an insulator model was introduced with two
different surface resistances per unit length rp1 and rp2 - corresponding to the stem and the shed of a longrod insulator. A
circular insulator disc model was also investigated 12. The contribution of arc current concentration at the roots to the
pollution layer surface resistance was included 13 14. Other refinements include the consideration of the arc electrode voltage
drops 13, effect of temperature on the pollution layer resistance14 and the influence of multiple parallel arcing that takes place
on many insulators - especially on those of large diameter15.
The d.c. model has been used to study the polluted insulator : test source interaction 16. This contributed to the interpretation
of the experimental results and to the determination of the minimum requirements for d.c. sources in polluted insulator tests17.
1999-09-01
Unfortunately, the d.c. model has been frequently used to account for polluted insulator performance under a.c. energisation11
, despite there being important basic differences - as is shown below.
13 14
U=
A x
im
(2-6)
A x No x
=
+ Rpx i
im
in
(2-7)
xc =
L
m+1
(2-8)
U c = B rpm+1 L
(2-9)
where B is a constant.
Expression 2-9 is similar to that of equation 2-4 for the d.c. case, although instead of n 0.8 - valid for the d.c. static
characteristic of a free-burning arc - m 0.5 in the a.c. arc re-ignition expression 2-6. Also, the constants in equations 2-9
and 2-4 are quite different. In fact, numerical evaluation of these expressions shows that for a high pollution severity - i.e.
relatively low values of rp - the critical a.c. voltage (rms) is much higher than the critical d.c. voltage. This difference
diminishes, however, at lower pollution severity and ultimately - with no pollution at all - the a.c. sparkover voltage peak
value is nearly equal to the corresponding d.c. voltage.
The a.c. model 21 has been used to investigate the source: polluted insulator interaction and has revealed the effect of the
parallel capacitance on insulator performance. It proved, therefore, to be quite useful in determining the minimum source
requirement 22. Recently, the model has been further used to investigate the effect of altitude on the performance of a.c.
insulators under pollution conditions23; see also the discussion in Section 3.3.8.
1999-09-01
For very long times to the half value - i.e. longer than 3000 s, a long pre-arc could be formed. In this case, the leakage
current flashover stress will be determined by the pre-arc only and reaches a value of approximately 0.7 kV/cm.
With a virtual impulse duration longer than 100 ms, a further decrease of the flashover voltage will be observed. This is not
caused by a new flashover mechanism. It is due to the fact that the pollution layer will be heated for a longer time duration by
the current flowing and so the surface conductivity will be increased.
In the range between 200 and 3000 s of th - i.e. SI range, the performance is more complicated; as is analysed below.
Figure 2-2: Flashover strength vs. the voltage-time duration for a cylindrical model insulator under pollution conditions 25.
1999-09-01
Figure 2-3: Flashover models for a.c./d.c. (a) and SI (b) 28.
Discharge with dry bands (application of SI with pre-stress).
As reported by Garbagnati et al 152, the SI strength can be reduced due to the presence of dry bands. If the flashover strength
is drawn versus the dry band length, typical U-curves are obtained.
Figure 2-4: Approach for the evaluation of the minimum flashover strength in the presence of dry bands 28.
In the presence of a short dry band, having a length ar (Figure 2-4), the flashover under positive SI first occurs from this dry
band in a very short time (air breakdown in the s range). This is followed by the flashover along the contaminated layer of
the length ag during a much longer time period (leakage - current flashover in the ms range).
1999-09-01
For dry band lengths smaller than 1 m, the strength of the air gap corresponds to the positive steamer gradient, i.e. 450 kV/m.
For longer dry band lengths, the mean breakdown strength corresponds to the minimum possible breakdown voltage per unit
length of a long air gap under positive SI.
To check if the proposed approach works, even for insulators of practical interest, the results of calculation are compared with
available experimental data. Because non-uniform contamination is to be regarded as the worst case, only the presence of dry
bands of critical lengths shall be considered in the following case.
As an example, Figure 3-28 shows the results obtained for a post insulator, where the experimental data of Garbagnati et al 152
are used. As is evident from the broken-line curve, the calculated values meet the measured ones quite well up to the longest
investigated insulator length of 12 m.
Another example is reported in Figure 3-33. Here, the calculated minimum curve agrees satisfactorily with the experimental
one presented by Garbagnati et al 152 for practical insulators up to 12 m length.
1999-09-01
10
DESCRIPTION 1
DESCRIPTION 2
Tropical
Dry
Warm
Temperate
Cold
Sub-Arctic
or Tundra
Arctic or Ice
cap
High
mountain
and Plateau
DESCRIPTION 3
Understand the physical process of the interaction between climate and insulator.
1999-09-01
11
The aim of such a study is to find the basic relationship between the atmospheric variables and the pollution phenomena.
Information on the time-variation of atmospheric variables is necessary. The information sources will, of course, vary as
needs differ. The Meteorological Service usually only provides general information, i.e. average values; However, when an
application is submitted to its research department, specific information can be obtained.
Depending on the study being made, either regional or local climate data will be used. For example, to study the insulation
design or maintenance of a transmission line 100 km long (place) and for an expected life of 50 years (time), regional climate
information will be used.
1999-09-01
12
Third, extreme changes in weather have been known to cause major outages because of unusual meteorological patterns.
Major storms that may occur with relatively low probability can suddenly cause severe coastal pollution. In inland areas, long
dry periods with little rain may also cause an unusual build-up of pollution.
DISSOLVING
Ionic Salts:
NaCl, Na2CO3,
MgCl2, gypsum CaSO4
Others,
Fly ash, cement
1999-09-01
13
12
10
0.03 mg/cm
8
0.10 mg/cm
6
Ca(NO3)2
4
MgCl2
Mg(NO3)2
Na2SO4
CaCl2
NaCl
MgSO4
NaNO3
0
0
20
40
60
Solubility (g/100 g H2O)
80
100
Figure 2-5: Relationship between Salt solubility and limiting flashover values (LFOV) 39.
Different salts also have different rates at which they go into solution; generally the higher the solubility of the salt the quicker
it will go into solution - but this is not always the case. This is shown in Table 2-3 where the salt is classified according to its
solubility and speed by which it goes into solution.
Table 2-3: General classification of salts according to their solution properties.
LOW SOLUBILITY SALTS
MgCl2 , NaCl
Highly soluble salts that dissolve quickly need a short time in contact with water to go into solution. Therefore, a highly
conductive layer can form quickly on the insulator during all wetting processes. However, with higher wetting rates - e.g. rain
etc. - the pollution will also be purged more easily from the insulator due to its high solubility.
Low solubility salts that also dissolve slowly need a large quantity of water to speed up the solution process. This is illustrated
in Figure 2-638. The relationship between ESDD and the quantity of distilled water used to make the measurement is shown
for insulators that came from two environments; one in an agricultural area, Huang Du, and another is from an environment
close to a steel plant. In both of these areas, the main pollutant is gypsum.
1999-09-01
14
Figure 2-6: Relation between ESDD and Quantity of distilled water 38.
This figure shows that for the naturally polluted insulators, an increase in ESDD occurs for an increase in the quantity of
distilled water used for making the measurement. This is in contrast to an insulator polluted artificially with NaCl - i.e. a fast
and highly soluble salt - that does not show the same tendency.
Various studies have shown that insulators contaminated with highly soluble and fast dissolving salts - such as NaCl - have
lower clean-fog withstand voltages than insulators contaminated with low solubility salts which are slow dissolving39 40 41 such as gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O) - in spite of them having the same contamination severity (see Figure 2-7).
Figure 2-7: Influence of various salts in the contamination layer on the insulator fog withstand voltage41.
It was also shown that the relationship between the flashover voltage in a steam fog test and the steam input-rate was
dependent on the type of salt on the insulator. A comparison was made between insulators naturally polluted - mainly gypsum
- and insulators artificially polluted with NaCl and kaolin 42. The results are presented in Figure 2-8, which show that the
flashover strength of insulators polluted with mainly gypsum have a greater dependency on steam input-rate than do insulators
polluted with NaCl.
The decrease in flashover voltage with increasing steam input-rate is ascribed to the greater amount of pollution that is
dissolved at the higher wetting-rate. To achieve the same flashover voltage during the test as that applied in-service
conditions when flashovers occurred, the steam input-rate had to be an order of magnitude higher than that recommended by
IEC 507 22.
1999-09-01
15
Figure 2-8: Flashover voltage of naturally and artificially polluted insulators as a function of steam input rate42.
Flashovers have been reported on insulators polluted by slow dissolving salts - such as gypsum (CaSO4) - but they generally
occurred during extended periods of wetting; i.e. dense fog, heavy rain storms lasting longer than three hours or live spray
washing 42 43.
Other factors that complicate the relationship between the type(s) of salt and the flashover voltage are when:
The solubility of a salt is affected by the existence of other salts; e.g. the solubility of CaSO4 is inhibited by the presence
of NaCl 37.
The process by which a salt goes into solution can be either exothermic (temperature rises) or endothermic (temperature
lowers). Any temperature change will greatly influence the conductivity of the solution that forms 69.
The wetting process of the insulator is influenced by the hygroscopic properties of the salt. Therefore, different wettingrates will occur for different salts - even though the ESDD values may be the same 69.
1999-09-01
16
However, the experimental results given in Figure 2-9 show that the deposit density on a specimen disc varies with the type of
inert material - in this case, Tonoko and Rogers kaolin - when the specimen is contaminated with a solution having the same
concentration of inert material. The results presented in Table 2-4 are, therefore, given for the same inert material deposit
density.
Figure 2-9: Relationship between NSDD and the quantity of inert materials in the contamination suspension 45.
Comparative test results of d.c. and a.c. contamination withstand voltage with Tonoko and Rogers kaolin are also shown in
Table 2-4 45. Significant differences - 20 to 25% - can be seen in the d.c. withstand voltage between Tonoko and Rogers
kaolin although the salt deposit density (SDD) is the same.
Table 2-4: Results form flashover voltage tests45.
Test
Voltage
1999-09-01
Specimen
Insulator
17
Table 2-4 shows that a 5-10% difference in the a.c.-contamination withstand voltages was found between Tonoko and Rogers
kaolin when the NSDD was adjusted to the same level. The variation of the surface resistance of the contaminated insulator
during the tests is shown in Figure 2-10, which illustrates that the surface resistance of an insulator contaminated with Rogers
kaolin reduces faster and is much lower than that of an insulator contaminated with Tonoko.
10
Tonoko
Brazilian kaolin
Mexican kaolin
Georgia kaolin
1.0
Italian kaolin
Rogers kaolin
0.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Figure 2-10: Time variation of surface resistance during the course of clean fog tests of contaminated insulator units
polluted with a combination of salt and various types of kaolin and Tonoko 48 .
The very wide variations in the physical and chemical properties of the various kinds of kaolin used internationally in
insulator contamination tests are shown in Table 2-548.
Table 2-5 : Physical and chemical properties of common inert materials used in insulator contamination tests 48.
Item
Particle Size, m
(50% value)
Main Constituents
of material
Measuring method
Laser Light Scattering
Tonoko
6.2
Rogers
5.8
Georgia
6.3
kaolin
Italy
4.5
X-ray Diffraction
Quartz
Muscovite
Quartz
Kaolinite
Quartz
Kaolinite
Quartz
Kaolinite
Chemical
Composition,
Percentage by
Mass
Loss on Ignition
X-ray
SiO2
Fluorescence
Al2O3
Fe2O3
4.8
67
16
5.8
14
46
37
0.9
14
46
38
0.7
12
48
37
0.7
Mexico
13.5
Brazil
25.9
Quartz
Kaolinite
Cristobalite
6
77
16
0.2
Quartz
Kaolinite
13
48
36
1.0
The surface resistance and the withstand voltage characteristics of an insulator artificially contaminated with these types of
kaolin, together with the Tonoko, are shown in Figure 2-10 and Figure 2-11 respectively 48. A large variation is apparent,
even among the various types of kaolin 10 49.
The main minerals of Tonoko and kaolin - as determined by the X-ray diffraction method - are Muscovite (Al2Si2O5(OH)4)
and Kaolinite (KAl2Si3Al10(OH)2) respectively, together with Quartz (SiO2) that is common to both.
The different surface resistivities of Tonoko and the various types of kaolin that apply under artificial fog conditions can be
explained by the different crystal structures of these materials. Hydroxyl groups [OH]- are located inside the crystal structure
in the case of Muscovite, whereas they are located outside the crystal structure in the case of Kaolinite. Kaolin consisting of
Kaolinite is, therefore, much more hydrophilic than Tonoko consisting of Muscovite.
Recently it was confirmed that the type of inert material had a similar influence on the contamination withstand voltage of
silicone rubber polymeric insulators 50.
1999-09-01
18
100
Comparitive Flashover voltage, %
(Tonoko=100%)
SDD
: 0.03 mg/cm
80
60
40
20
0
Tonoko
Brazilian kaolin
Roger's kaolin
Mexican kaolin
Type of inert material
Georgia kaolin
Italian kaolin
Figure 2-11: d.c. Withstand voltage test results of artificially contaminated insulators with various kinds of inert material 48.
The type of inert pollution, therefore, influences the formation of a conductive layer. It can be classified as being either:
hydrophilic or hydrophobic. A hydrophilic substance will aid the formation of a conductive film on the insulator surface 51
whereas a hydrophobic material will inhibit the formation of such a film. It has been shown that a truly inert material is
neither hydrophobic nor hydrophilic - such as is quartz - and so does not significantly influence the flashover voltage of an
insulator52.
Figure 2-12: The influence of the amount of inert material on the contamination withstand voltage of porcelain longrod and
disc type insulators (Tests performed at NGK).
A substantial reduction is apparent in the withstand voltage with an increase in the amount of Tonoko present, expressed in
NSDD. This reduction is in spite of the smaller influence of NSDD compared with that of ESDD. This is due to the thicker
layer of inert material because it retains more water - thereby increasing the amount of soluble contaminant that is dissolved.
The result is a lower surface resistance and, therefore, a lower withstand voltage.
1999-09-01
19
b) Polymeric Insulators
A similar tendency in the relationship between the NSDD and the contamination withstand voltage exists for polymeric
insulators, as shown in Figure 2-1350. A delayed recovery of hydrophobicity with the increase in NSDD on the insulator
surface was also reported, as is illustrated in Figure 2-14.
Figure 2-13: The relationship between NSDD and contamination withstand voltage for polymeric insulators 50.
The withstand voltage of hydrophobic polymeric insulators that are contaminated heavily with inert materials may be reduced
by the thicker water film and the delayed recovery of hydrophobicity. The latter is due to the inhibited migration of low
molecular weight silicone from the bulk to the surface of the contaminant layer.
1999-09-01
20
v
v
v
v
Fp = Fw + Fg + FE
(2-10)
The force of the electric field, E, on a neutral particle is the dielectrophoretic force - sometimes called the grad E force - and
that on a charged particle is the electrostatic force. The latter can only have an effect under d.c. voltage.
The results of calculations by Annestrand and Shei55 indicate that wind is the dominant force governing the movement of
contaminant particles for wind speeds of about two to three metres per second and above. When the wind speed is low, the
electrostatic force (in case of d.c. voltage) and the gravitational force will dominate. The effect of the dielectrophoretic force
is weaker than that of the other forces. Therefore, for a.c. voltages, wind is the dominant factor. In contrast, under d.c.
conditions, the electrostatic force also plays an appreciable part.
The heating effect of leakage current is another mechanism that may contribute to the accumulation of pollution on the
insulator. That is, when salt is deposited on the insulator in the dissolved state - see Section 2.3.2.1.1 - it can be left behind
when the water evaporates due to the Joule heating of the leakage current. As a consequence:
In high stress parts of the insulator, the heating effect will hinder its natural cleaning 4.
Under salt-fog conditions, the repeated drying out of the deposited wet contaminant layer leaves a residue of salt that
accumulates.
It has been shown that under a.c. voltage, the heating effect of leakage current has a larger influence than the dielectrophoretic
force on the pollution accumulation on the insulator surface 4.
S = Ci Vi 3 t i
where:
1999-09-01
S
Vi
ti
C
=
=
=
=
(2-11) 59
21
(mg/cm2)
(m/s)
(hour)
Figure 2-15: Accumulation of contaminants by a strong sea-wind on the under surface of a typical insulator59.
Wind can transport pollutants over long distances 60. These pollutants can be solids or gasses. Figure 2-16 shows that
although the effect of the sea reduces rapidly with distance from the coastline, wind may carry pollutants inland so that the
effect of the coast can still be significant at some distance depending on the topography. A higher than normal pollution-layer
can result from the use of fertilisers by spraying or the burning of crop residues, due to the transport of the pollutants by the
wind.
Figure 2-16: The relationship between the distance from the coast and measured ESDD on a standard disc insulator under
ordinary salt-pollution conditions 76.
In contrast, the action of wind may mitigate against the pollution flashover process because it could 74 93:
Remove non-attaching particles.
Extinguish the arc on a polluted surface.
The processes under which wind brings the contaminants onto the insulator surface is called the aerodynamic catch52.
Although this process is very complex and can not be fully described, the discussion of this section will highlight the
important parameters and mechanisms.
When the airflow approaches an insulator, it divides; thereby leaving a stagnation point where the air is at rest. The
suspended particles, having a density greater than that of air, are unable to follow the airflow and so may be deposited on the
insulator surface. Similarly, when the airflow passes the under-rib on an insulator, it generates vortices inside the ribs. As a
consequence, some quite small and low-density particles will be deposited there. Therefore, vertically mounted insulators
1999-09-01
22
with a simple shape - the so called aerodynamic profile - will collect less contaminants in wind than do the insulators with
an under-rib profile for the same location. A laboratory measurement in a wind tunnel shows the effect of different shed
profiles for vertically mounted insulators 54. The insulators of aerodynamic shed profile are less contaminated when the wind
is the only dominant force, as indicated in Figure 2-17.
Figure 2-17: Variation of pollution catch with shape 54 H: Heavy; M: Medium; L: Light; Z: Zero deposit 54.
For horizontally mounted insulators, the area presented to the wind by the insulator is important. In cases where the pollution
source has a well-defined direction, horizontal insulators pointing to the source, or away from it, will collect more pollution
than do corresponding insulators pointing 90o from it125.
A rougher surface and the presence of moisture can also contribute to a higher accumulation of contamination 55.
3
10
ESDD (Lee side)
L K
G
H
B
A
C
D
7
Lee Side
1,5
NSDD (mg/cm )
Wind Side
2
0,5
1
0
A
Position on Insulator
1999-09-01
23
The pollution deposit on an insulator is also influenced by the cleaning action of wind. This is especially true in desert areas
where the wind may carry quite large sand particles (>200 m). These particles sand blast the insulator surface, thereby
enhancing the natural cleaning of insulators. Also, they erode the metallic parts of the insulator. It is the smaller particles
carried by wind, <100 m, that adhere to the insulator surface. These particles also polish the metallic parts 62 63.
1999-09-01
24
200
Rainrate (mm/h)
100
100
50
25
10
5
1
MIAMI
(Cumulus)
50
20
100
50
25
10
5
1
10
5
SEATTLE
(Stratus-Alto Stratus)
2
1
0.5
1
2 3
6
Rain duration (hours)
12
24
Figure 2-19: Intensity versus duration rain curves for various return period (1-100 years) for Miami, Florida (solid lines)
and Seattle, Washington (dashed lines) 32.
Table 2-6: Major types of precipitation 32.
TYPE OF PRECIPITATION
Rain
Drizzle
Freezing rain or Drizzle
Snowflakes
Sleet
Snow pellets also known as
soft hail
Snow grains
Ice pellets
Hail
Ice prisms
1999-09-01
DESCRIPTION
Drops with diameter >0.5 mm, but smaller drops are still called rain if
they are widely scattered.
Fine drops with diameter <0.5 mm and very close to one another.
Rain or drizzle, the drops of which freeze on impact with the ground.
Loose aggregates of ice crystals, most of which are branched.
Partly melted snowflakes or rain and snow falling together.
White opaque grains of ice spherical or sometimes conical with diameter
about 2-5 mm.
Very small, white, opaque grains of ice - flat or elongated with diameter
generally <1 mm.
Transparent or translucent pellets of ice, spherical or irregular, with
diameter < 5 mm.
There are two types:
a) frozen rain or drizzle drops, or largely melted and then re-frozen
snowflakes.
b) snow pellets encased in a thin layer of ice (also known as small hail).
Small balls or pieces of ice with diameters 5-50 mm or sometimes more.
Un-branched ice crystals in the form of needles, columns or plates.
25
The major types of precipitation are given in Table 2-6. Resistivity measurements of rainwater taken in Japan72 are shown in
Figure 2-20 as a frequency distribution. The average, of the distribution of resistivity, ranges from 10 to 30 kcm.
Figure 2-21: The relationship between the resistivity of rainfall and reduction-rate of the flashover voltage 72.
1999-09-01
26
2.3.4.2 Fog
Fog may form when a volume of air is cooled to below its dew point. "Radiation" fog forms when the earth cools through
radiative heat loss. Particularly on calm, clear nights - when the radiation effect is large - the air may be cooled below its dew
point and a fog will result. This will begin to form very close to the ground - around midnight - and will gradually thicken and
deepen as the night progresses 32.
Another mechanism producing fog is associated with the horizontal movement of the air. If a warm air stream starts to blow
over a cooler surface, the air rapidly adjusts to the temperature of that surface. Again, given sufficient cooling or sufficiently
moist air, fog will result. This type of fog is known as "advection" fog.
Winter fog conditions can also prove to be severe for pollution-related flashovers180. The presence of fog at 0oC (i.e. called
ice-fog in Table 2-7) ensures a high level of relative humidity that promotes effective and complete wetting of the insulator by
ensuring a conversion of the ice - on the surface of the insulator - to surface wetting, rather than sublimation to water vapour.
If sufficient pollution has been captured in the ice layer on the insulator's surface, the effective wetting produced by the icefog conditions will lead to a low surface resistance and an increased likelihood of flashover.
Table 2-7: Fog Characteristics - Typical values.
FOG PARAMETER
RADIATION FOG
ADVECTION FOG
ICE - FOG
(m)
10
20
(m)
5 - 35
7 - 65
2 - 30
0.10
7 - 65
0.10
300
200
1999-09-01
(m/s)
(m)
0.5 - 4
100
27
Natural fog density ranges from 0.01 g/m3 (very light) to 1.0 g/m3 (very heavy sea fog) and about 90 % of all fogs have
densities <0.5 g/m3. Other typical characteristics are given in Table 2-7. Artificial fog for insulator testing has a density of 10
to 100 times greater than that of natural fog. One reason for this difference is that most test facilities are not thermally
insulated well enough to maintain a uniform fog density less than about 2.0 g/m3. Another reason is that artificial tests are
intended to encompass the entire spectrum of fog, mist and drizzle4. In Table 2-8 the characteristics of the artificial fog of
some laboratories are given.
Table 2-8: Artificial Fog Characteristics - Typical values.
FOG PARAMETER
MEXICO
MEXICO
CRIEPI
NGK
IREQ
Fog type
Ultra Sonic
Steam
Steam
Steam
Steam
(m)
(m)
3
17
10
4 - 28
17 - 19
5 - 20
11
3-7
4.5
Fog and rain can, depending on the wind conditions, wet the under surface of the insulator more effectively than the
condensation mechanism.
2.3.4.3 Condensation
Condensation occurs when the surface temperature of the insulator falls below the dew-point temperature.
On clear still nights, the insulator surface - particularly the top one - loses heat through radiation to the night sky faster that
heat can be supplied to it by air currents. If the temperature drops below the dew point, moisture forms on the surface of the
insulator. These conditions are commonly produced in desert environments at night or early mornings 73 74.
Dew-condensation wetting is a major cause of flashover on service insulators. Studies have shown that this often occurs in the
early morning hours when the insulator is at a lower temperature than that of the ambient air - due to thermal lag.
1999-09-01
28
The main conclusion from the studies of Chizan and Pohl 69 is that the intensity of moisture absorption on an insulator surface
depends upon the chemical constitution of the pollution. The effect of intense and continuous moisture absorption can cause
long-lasting surface discharges at operating voltage or can be a reason for flashover shortly after the voltage has been applied.
High air-humidity and the hygroscopic properties of pollution layers are also very important in determining the switchingimpulse performance of insulators.
WASHING EFFECT
PRECIPITATION
mm
1999-09-01
29
A mechanism whereby antifog insulators collect less pollution than do aerodynamically shaped insulators in certain desert
areas may be as follows. Near the coast, where the humidity during the night is generally high, the insulators may be wetted
so that the bond between its surface and pollution is increased. Due to the relatively larger exposed surface of the
aerodynamic insulator - which allows it to cool more effectively than that of other insulator types, this insulator will be wetted
more than the antifog insulator with a more convoluted surface. Hence, the aerodynamic insulators may then collect more
pollution. Another factor that may play a role is the area of the exposed top surface. This is especially so in regions where
pollution fallout may be considerable. Also, there is the difference in the cleaning by the wind of the pollution particles for
the different profiles80.
Figure 2-23: Distribution of salt on the surfaces of insulators of two greatly different profiles after field exposure in a desert
77
area .
In areas with regular monthly precipitation, insulators with an aerodynamic profile are less contaminated in both the shortterm (monthly) and the long-term (a year or more) exposure 38. Some areas receive rain only for a few months while the rest
of the year is very dry. In such areas, aerodynamic sheds may collect less contamination during the dry months than do those
with more complex profiles. After the rainy months, aerodynamic sheds are certainly less contaminated than are those of the
convoluted-shed design81. If maintenance is performed, an open profile is much easier to handle than a profile with a
convoluted underside. The top/bottom ratio of the pollution on the insulator sheds can be different in different areas and for
different times of the year. Sometimes, the bottom surface of a shed is more polluted than the top surface and sometimes the
opposite occurs81.
1999-09-01
30
120
100
80
60
40
Abha
Bisha
Arar
Tabouk
Riyadh
Dhahran
Yanbu
20
Ghazlan
140
Figure 2-24: A comparison of the amount of pollution collected on different shapes of insulator at eight desert-pollution
stations 80.
2.3.7.2 Orientation
Results obtained in Mexico - in 23 insulator testing stations installed under various climatic and pollution conditions - have
provided correction factors for chemical composition and uneven distribution of salts for different regions. Also, long-term
patterns of pollution-accumulation show that cap-and-pin insulator strings with an inclined orientation tend to collect less
contaminants than do vertically mounted ones - the ratio being 0.9. Horizontally installed insulators collect even less - the
ratio being 0.15. However, orientation effects vary depending on the region (rural, marine, industrial or a combination of
them)82.
Tension insulators may also be subject to a direction effect if the major source of contamination is from a well-defined source
125
. In this case, there can be an influence of orientation and direction in determining the insulator performance under natural
pollution for a particular location or type of location. For other locations where contamination can accumulate rapidly, or the
frequency of natural cleaning by rainfall is very low, the influence of orientation may be significantly altered - from that stated
above - for the same insulator type.
2.3.7.3 Diameter
Field experience indicates that - for cylindrical insulators - the larger the diameter of an insulator, the smaller the ESDD level
it accumulates over a given time as compared to that on the bottom surface of a 250 mm suspension insulator83. The results of
the measurement of ESDD on a series of cylindrical insulators with different diameters, which were exposed - under deenergised conditions - to typical coastal contamination, are shown in Figure 2-25 85.
The relationship between the level of relative ESDD and the average diameter, D, of the insulator was found to be:
(2-12)
where ESDDr = 1 for the cylindrical insulator with an average diameter of 115 mm. However, it has been recommended by
Ozaki et al84 that, for design purposes, it would be more appropriate to use a more conservative relationship - such as:
(2-13)
Note: this latter function takes into account the rather large scatter of the measured values.
31
2.0
1/2
0.7
0.5
ESDD = 13.9D-0.55
0.3
0.2
115
200
400
700
1000
Average Diameter, D, mm
Figure 2-25: Relationship between the diameter of a porcelain insulator and the contaminant-deposit density under deenergised and natural service conditions85.
2.3.7.4 Material
Another factor that influences the pollution deposit on insulators is the housing material. Figure 2-26, which is based on that
reported by Imagawa et al 86, shows comparative ESDD measurements taken on silicone rubber and porcelain insulators at
both inland and coastal sites. These results indicate that silicone rubber insulators tend to accumulate more pollution than do
the porcelain ones. Measurements performed in Tunisia61 have indicated that this trend is also true for desert-type
environments.
0,1
0,01
0,001
0,0001
0,0001
0,001
0,01
2
ESDD (Porcelain), mg/cm
0,1
Figure 2-26: Comparison of ESDD for porcelain and polymer insulators at 4 different sites86.
1999-09-01
32
2.3.7.6 Conclusion
All of the aforementioned effects culminate in the build-up of contaminants on the insulator surface. In particular, it is
dependent on the product of pollution deposit-rate and the time interval between the washing events. An equilibrium
condition may take some years to occur between the deposit-rate and insulator cleaning-rate. This is illustrated in Figure 2-27.
1999-09-01
33
DENSITY (g/cm3)
APPEARANCE
SHAPE
glaze
0.8 - 0.9
cylindrical icicles
hard rime
0.6 - 0.9
opaque
soft rime
<0.6
AIR TEMPERATURE
(C)
-10<T<0
WIND SPEED
(m/s)
0<V<15
DROPLET
DIAMETER
0. 5-5 mm
TYPICAL STORM
DURATION
hours
in-cloud icing
-20<T<-1
Unlimited
1-50 m
days
wet snow
-1<T<2
Unlimited
snowflakes
hours
Air temperature.
1999-09-01
34
Impact velocity.
Heat exchange between equipment (power transformers, etc.) and the environment
Supercooled drops and/or droplets can have a meteorological origin (fog, drizzle and rain, or salt spray from the sea) or
anthropogenic (man made) origin (spray from cooling towers, etc.).
Ice accretion on an insulator occurs usually on only one of its sides - i.e. the windward side. In practical cases, some sections
of insulators may be free of ice. In the case of wet grown-ice, icicles may bridge two or more adjacent insulator sheds or - in
the case of cap and pin insulators - the icicles may bridge two or more adjacent units in the string.
1999-09-01
35
DENSITY (g/cm3)
APPEARANCE
SHAPE
dry snow
0.1
white
wet snow
0.3 - 0.7
white to opaque
1999-09-01
36
INSULATOR CHARACTERISTICS
Introduction
performance is described - have had widespread application in all types of environment. For overhead line applications, many
factors other than axial length or creepage path length are known to influence this performance. Shape - such as the number
affect service performance. Differences in the behaviour of insulators in various orientations may be due to the accumulation
of pollution, the effect of natural washing by rain and the physical characteristics of discharges on the surfaces.
insulators have had, they have seen increasing application since their first introduction at transmission-class voltages in the
1970s. Many developments and improvements in this technology have taken place to the point that utilities now are
have become available for applications in substations such as support insulators and equipment insulators. The main reasons
for using polymeric insulators are 101
As a general statement, service experience has demonstrated that the performance of polymeric insulators is good if the
insulators have been properly dimensioned and if the housing material and design are appropriate for the intended application.
indicate that service-induced changes in the housing material of these insulators may play a greater role in their long-term
performance than is the case for glass and porcelain insulators.
3- : Summary of properties of insulator dielectric materials54
PROPERTY
Density
Tensile strength
Compressive strength
Tensile modulus
Thermal conductivity
Thermal Expansion Coefficient
NITS
x10-6
G
PORCELAIN
2.3-3.9
30-100
240-820
50-100
1-4
3.5-9.1
OUGHENED
POLYMER
G
2.5
100-120
210-300
72
1.0
8.0-9.5
RBGF**
2.1-2.2
1 300-1 600
700-750
43-60
0.2-1.2
7.5-20
5-20
3-20
1013-1016
1013-1016
This report covers only the pollution performance of polymeric insulators, since Cigr Study Committees 15 and 22 are
mandated to deal with material and insulator ageing.
1999-09-01
37
3.2.2 Polymers
The choice of materials for polymeric insulators will largely determine their pollution flashover performance. The selection
of creepage distance of the insulator may not, therefore, be as an important a factor as it is in the case of glass or porcelain
insulators.
The most common construction for polymeric insulators is the composite longrod. Here a resin-bonded glass fibre core
provides the mechanical strength and a polymer outer housing resists degradation from weathering and other environmental
factors.
There is some evidence to show that the glass fibre core can fail as a result of the ingress - or the internal formation - of
acid103 104. Certain manufacturers use special glass formulations that are resistant to this form of attack.
There is a wide variety of materials that can be used for the outer housing. The properties that have been shown to be the
most important in service are water repellency (hydrophobicity) and resistance to tracking. In most formulations, a filler such as alumina trihydrate - is used to impart tracking resistance. Silicone rubber has become very widely used on account of
its very low surface energy, which inhibits the formation of a water film on the surface. A further, and considerable,
advantage with silicone rubber is that low molecular weight components in the rubber diffuse into contaminant layers on the
surface and impart hydrophobic properties to them105.
Earlier authors (e.g. Looms 54) have given detailed descriptions of the different insulating materials used for polymeric
insulators. Values have been quoted for dielectric strength, permittivity, conductivity and other parameters of the materials
along with value judgements on their advantages and disadvantages for high-voltage insulation applications. However, the
ever-increasing number of materials and production processes used for such insulators make a simple classification difficult.
Often, polymeric housing materials are divided into simple classes; the most common being, silicone and ethylene propylene
diene monomer (EPDM). Such a generalisation is dangerous for there are many different silicone rubber and EPDM
formulations used for electrical insulation, each with specific characteristics for the chosen application and manufacturing
process. For example, silicones can first be subdivided into Room Temperature Vulcanised (RTV) and High Temperature
Vulcanised (HTV); these are entirely different products whose raw form ranges from a pourable liquid to a dense solid paste
or granules. The production process can be by gravity pouring, extrusion or high pressure/temperature injection to name but a
few.
Each manufacturer chooses a formulation adapted to the process and to the characteristics required of the finished product.
Hence, the amount of filler, the type of catalyst, the types and proportions of silicone molecules and other elements of the
polymer vary notably from one product to another. Defining specific values for the various mechanical or electrical
properties of polymers becomes impossible in such circumstances. Equally the behaviour of the polymer in service is
dependent on many parameters, which include not only the material and process but also the form of the housing and the
fittings.
The material formulation and production process have an influence on the polymer housing characteristics; the following list
gives those which are considered to be among the most important:
hydrophobicity,
tracking resistance,
erosion resistance,
puncture resistance,
1999-09-01
38
The appropriate design of polymeric insulators for specific polluted environments must, therefore, take these properties of the
insulator into account and the changes in them that may take place over time. It should also be noted that, as in the case of
pollution level is excessive or has increased appreciably since the initial selection was made.
Current standards provided in IEC publications - such as IEC 1109 - include general tests to evaluate overall performance
of a polymeric insulator (in this case covering materials, manufacturing process and form) taking into account many of the
performance can be determined not from the basic characteristics of the insulating components, but - rather - from the overall
behaviour of the finished product.
Insulator performance
Fog, Clean-Fog) determines only the ability of the insulator to cope electrically with a controlled severity of wetted pollution.
In contrast, the natural pollution test fully replicates the service condition in that it shows both the extent to which an insulator
when naturally wetted (e.g. fog, mist, drizzle etc).
Major research programmes - most employing artificial pollution but a substantial number using natural pollution - have
work are found in Section 10
the housing materials of the polymeric insulator types were of the ethylene propylene formulations, silicone rubber and epoxyresin. These various insulator types embrace wide ranges of size - both length and diameter - and shape (i.e. profile); the
10.1. Some tests have been performed
The results have been analysed in terms of both the critical axial stress (i.e. critical voltage divided by the axial distance
between metal fittings) and the critical surface stress (i.e. critical voltage divided by the leakage path length along the surface
N(E)
1.2
A
2.1
N(J)
1.4
A(C)
1.7
d.c.
A(K)
1.7
1.5
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.7
A(K)
1.4
A(F)
2.3
1.4
1.9
(Axial stress)
(Surface stress)
* N(E)
N(S)
N(J)
A(T)
A(K)
A(K)
)
5**
27
17
25
Table
10-25
Table
Table
10-31
Table
Table
10-30
Table
Table
10-29
10-26
Table 10-33
10-29
**
For the same test method and the same severe severity of pollution, Table 3-2
1999-09-01
This variation is expressed as the ratio of the average electrical stress-value for the best insulator to that of the worst one
(Section 10.2 provides a comprehensive summary of the corresponding stress-data). In addition, these tables give the number
of insulator types in each category and the relevant table number in Section 10.2.
These findings clearly demonstrate that the pollution flashover performance of an insulator can not be related solely to either
axial stress or surface stress; i.e. if it were, this ratio would obviously be unity. It is seen that this ratio for axial stress is in
the range of 1.2 to 2.3 and 1.1 to >1.7 for ceramic and polymeric types respectively. For the same two sets of insulator-types
the corresponding ratio for surface stress is in the range 1.4 to 2.3 and 1.2 to >4.7 respectively. Such a large variation occurs
even for insulators of the same generic shape when subjected to both the same test method and pollution severity. For
example for cap and pin insulators under a.c. energisation in the Salt-Fog test, this ratio is 1.9 and 1.8 for axial stress and
surface stress respectively.
Table 3-3: Ratio of best to worst insulator performance, for polymeric insulators.
ENERGISATION
Pollution *
Performance ratio
(Axial stress)
Performance ratio
(Surface stress)
Number of insulator types
Table giving data
Notes: * N(E)
A(S)
A(C)
A(K)
A(K)
A(F)
a.c.
d.c.
N(E)
>1.7
A(S)
1.3
A(C)
1.2
A(K)
1.6
A(K)
1.2
A(F)
1.1
>4.7
1.4
1.2
1.8
1.5
1.3
5
4
2
5
6
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
10-34
10-35
10-37
10-36
10-38
is natural marine pollution in England, 60 kg/m3 salt-fog.
is artificial salt-fog of 80 kg/m3.
is artificial pollution, of cement slurry.
is artificial pollution, Kaolin/NaCl of ESDD = 0.05 mg/ cm2.
is artificial pollution, Kaolin/NaCl of ESDD = 0.07 mg/ cm2.
is artificial salt-fog of 28 kg/m3.
6
Table
10-38
Other findings that throw further doubt on the use of solely axial stress or surface stress for insulator dimensioning purposes
are covered in the sections that follow.
Although the correlation of pollution flashover performance with the various characteristics of the insulator (e.g. leakage
path, axial length, form factor, pin cavity / core diameter and overall diameter) are generally poor, there are some discernible
trends when examined from the viewpoint of generic shape - e.g. (a) disc design (i.e. cap and pin) (b) cylindrical design (i.e.
longrod, post barrel) - waveform of energisation (i.e. a.c. or d.c.); material (i.e. ceramic - meaning glass or porcelain - or
polymeric).
E S p
(3-1)
The value of p provided by Lambeth 1, for various types of insulator and numerous types of pollution test, falls within the
range 0.08 to 0.6; to which he comments that insulators with plain open shedding tend to have the higher values of p. Further,
his analysis indicates that the Salt-Fog test gives higher values of p than does the Solid-Layer-type test.
From the mathematical viewpoint, the value of p can be considered as a weighted average of the one for the electrolyte surface
(e.g. p=0.33 for brine) and that for the air breakdown (p=0) between parts of the insulator surface.
The corresponding relationship in terms of specific length SL is:
SL S s
(3-2)
where the value of s is obviously related to that of p for each type of insulator and test method.
From the data presented in Section 10.2 and elsewhere, SL can be considered in two ways:
1999-09-01
40
SAL, Specific Axial Length; defined as the axial distance between the metal fittings divided by the voltage across the
2.
insulator (i.e. the inverse of surface stress).
Some typical relationships of specific length versus pollution severity are shown in
insulator types and pollution test methods, the general trend is for s = 0.2 in equation 3-2.
Figure 3-1: Performance of standard types of a.c. cap and pin insulators in the Salt-Fog test and in the Clean-Fog test 107.
Figure 3-1 attempts to correlate the severity scale for the Salt-Fog test with that for the Clean-Fog test when applied to
standard designs of cap and pin insulators. However, this figure clearly shows that there is a substantial spread in the specific
creepage length at any value of pollution severity - thereby reinforcing the point made earlier that specific creepage is not the
only factor that needs to be used when dimensioning such insulators. The data from which this figure has been compiled are
provided in Section 10.3.
Figure 3-2: Dielectric strength of different a.c. insulators in the Salt-Fog test 197.
In contrast, the results for the porcelain longrod - presented in Figure 3-2 as solid dots - are reasonably well ordered and so
suggest that the sole use of specific creepage is probably valid for this design. The likely reason being that the shape of this
insulator is relatively simple and that the ratio of shed diameter to core diameter is not large. Nonetheless, the general trend
of specific creepage distance with withstand salinity is similar to that for the discs.
1999-09-01
41
Figure 3-2 also provides a comparison of some results for the cap and pin design of insulator with those for some post-type
insulators. Again these results show a considerable spread of values for these cylindrical types of insulator - thereby
supporting the analysis reported earlier.
A complicating feature of comparing the results of different test methods is that the ranking of insulator performance is not
always the same - as amply demonstrated in Figure 3-3 for some d.c. cap and pin insulators, when subjected to: (a) the SaltFog test (b) the Clean-Fog test and (c) a dust-spray method. These results indicate the important effect that insulator profile
has on the electrical strength of such insulators.
120
Uw
U50/L (kV/m)
Uw
110
90
80
70
60
50
40
(a) Salt-fog method, 28 kg/m3
Figure 3-3: d.c. Pollution performance of different ceramic insulators under different laboratory pollution test methods, Uw :
withstand voltage, U50: 50% flashover voltage, L: the axial spacing between insulator fittings, v-: glass insulator, p:porcelain insulator. (Data are from the paper of Pargamin et al 315; the bottom line of each insulator is positioned in respect
to the voltage values).
1999-09-01
42
Station post insulators having a deep under-rib profile - very similar to that of type II shown in Figure 3-4, but with different
dimensions - have been tested and compared 109 with one having the alternate long-and-short shed profile and another of the
plain-shed type. The results are provided in Table 3-4. The tests were performed under d.c. voltage with the Fog Withstand
method. The importance of keeping a large shed spacing while increasing the creepage distance can be seen when
comparison is made with the results for the various deep under-rib profiles.
Figure 3-4: d.c. Laboratory pollution test results with Solid-Layer method for station post insulators108.
Table 3-5 110 provides results that demonstrate that an insulator of an alternate long-and-short profile with a large shed spacing
can perform as good as an insulator with a deep under-rib profile. The final choice from among the various insulator-shed
profiles should be based on the site conditions, taking account of the different aerodynamic properties that influence the
pollution-catch and the natural cleaning ability of the insulator.
Table 3-4: d.c. Laboratory pollution test with Fog Withstand method - SDD: 0.03mg/cm2 - for station post insulators with a
core diameter of 125 mm 109.
PROFILE
deep under-rib
SPACING
OVERHANG
EFFECTIVE HEIGHT
mm
70
85
mm
mm
1006
95
95
alternate long short
normal
1999-09-01
85
95
105
105
65
70
1006
1008
1008
1008
1008
43
A
mm
4070
3480
3505
3605
STRESS
99.2
109.3
118.0
119.0
104.2
90.2
Table 3-5: d.c. Laboratory pollution test with Solid-Layer method - SDD, 0.02 mg/cm2 - of an insulator having an effective
height of 1.95 m and a core diameter of 0.22 m 110.
LUHV =
LEHV VUHV
VEHV
(3-3)
Where :
LUHV
LEHV
VUHV
VEHV
Note: the specification is based on EHV data - rather than that from lower voltage levels - to avoid large errors in string
efficiency that could arise from even small errors in the flashover voltage of short strings.
The dependence of long-string efficiency on the line-to-earth voltage is shown in Figure 3-5, which applies to standard
vertical insulator strings up to 11.5 m connection length. The equivalent salt deposit density (ESDD) is in the range of 0.010.04 mg/cm2.
1999-09-01
44
100
90
80
70
60
0
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
kV
Figure 3-5: Long-string efficiency for a.c. energisation as a function of line to earth voltage.
Range of ESDD 0.01-0.04 mg/cm2. IEEE insulators (146 mm spacing, 254 mm diameter, and ratio leakage to spacing 2.1).
For antifog insulators, the results for long-string efficiency are shown in Figure 3-6 for string connection lengths up to 8 m. In
this case, the range of ESDD is 0.02-0.04 mg/cm2.
100
90
80
70
60
0
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
kV
Figure 3-6: Long-string efficiency for a.c. energisation as a function of line to earth voltage.
Range of ESDD 0.02-0.04 mg/cm2. Antifog insulators (220 mm spacing, 420 mm diameter, and ratio leakage to spacing 3.3).
From a limited number of artificial pollution tests conducted under project UHV, it has been concluded that a proper
assessment of the non-linearity aspect can only be determined once all the factors in the wetting process of the insulators are
known 111.
A comparison of the test results for indoor- and outdoor-conditions indicates that the indoor values are probably more
comparable to worst-case conditions111.
In another study 125, carried out at the Brighton Insulator Test station (BITS) in UK, insulators for both EHV (up to 420 kV)
and UHV (up to 1560 kV) systems were tested side by side under natural coastal conditions. For overhead line insulators, it
has been concluded that the flashover stress (in kV/m) was unaffected by the voltage level up to at least 1200 kV system; the
test results are given in Figure 7-13 of Section 7.2.8. For the multiple-cone type post insulator tested, on the other hand, a
significant reduction (13 %) was found in the performance at the higher voltage level.
1999-09-01
45
Figure 3-7: Relationship between axial distance and a.c. contamination flashover voltage 114.
For a given type of standard insulator and of an antifog cap and pin design, the withstand voltage (obtained by the Clean-Fog
test method) has been found to be proportional to the creepage distance of the insulator - as is shown in Figure 3-7. Such a
linear relationship is also applicable to station post insulators 114.
Figure 3-8: d.c. Pollution test (Solid-Layer method). Cap and pin insulators. U50 vs. string length117.
1999-09-01
46
Test results for station post insulators also have the same trend. At a low pollution level, because of the non-linearity reported
by several laboratories, the total insulator length for a given type of insulator needs to be increased by 10-15 % for 600 kV
systems and 15-20 % for 800 kV systems with respect to the design made assuming linearity; see Figure 3-9 and Figure 3-10.
However, it should be noted that these discussions are based on laboratory results. When performing an artificial pollution
test the whole insulator string is, in most cases, polluted uniformly. In natural conditions, however, non-uniform pollution
distribution along the insulator string is often encountered. Furthermore, at a higher voltage level, more pollution may be
attracted to the insulator - as already mentioned in Section 2.3.7.5. All these factors add to the uncertainty for making linear
extrapolation of the required insulator lengths from a lower-voltage level to a higher-voltage level.
Figure 3-9: U50 as function of the length of the suspension string under d.c. (Negative polarity) pollution tests 118 116.
Figure 3-10: The U50 (d.c. negative polarity) as a function of the total height of the station post insulators110.
1999-09-01
47
SL D q
(3-4)
where q is a constant having a value that is particular for the set of conditions of the insulators generic shape, the material, the
energisation waveform and type of pollution. In Figure 3-11 test data are shown for a.c. energisation that reveal this
relationship. Similar test data exist for the case of d.c. energisation85.
Figure 3-11: Relationship between average diameter and required leakage distance in per unit of a.c. withstand voltage
(for shed shapes please refer to Table 10-22).
85
The best support for equation 3-4 occurs when the insulators are of the same profile and only the diameter is varied; Figure 312 shows the results for d.c. housings that have been subjected to a Clean-Fog test with an ESDD of 0.12 mg/cm2
Figure 3-12: Specific Axial Length vs. insulator diameter for d.c. ceramic housings under Clean-Fog test199; Table 10-33
refers.
1999-09-01
48
When the insulator profiles vary, the spread in the results is greater - even to the extent that they fall within a band rather than
approximate to a straight line. Figure 3-13 and Figure 3-14 show results for a.c. disc insulators and a.c. cylindrical insulators
respectively that are subjected to a Salt-Fog test of 80 kg/m3.
Upper values
Lower values
Figure 3-13: Specific creepage length vs. insulator diameter for a.c. ceramic disc insulators under salt-fog pollution; Table
10-24 refers (number next to point is ranking in Table 10-24).
Figure 3-14: Specific creepage length vs. insulator diameter for a.c. ceramic cylindrical insulators under artificial pollution;
Table 10-24 refers.
The values of q in equation 3-4 for those test findings that provide a moderate to good support for this relationship are given
in Table 3-6. This table also gives the corresponding table number in Section 10 from which the information was obtained.
All the other findings using the tables given in Section 10.2 give either only weak support for this equation or, in the case of
some d.c. results, a negative slope. It is tempting to ascribe this negative-slope finding to the weakness of the d.c. supply; i.e.
1999-09-01
49
for the same pollution conditions, the leakage current increases as the average diameter increases --- thereby, possibly,
resulting in voltage-regulation problems. However, at least one such case is known in which the source was strong 118.
Therefore, this negative-slope characteristic warrants further investigation. It should be noted that the results presented in
Table 3-6 are for ceramic insulators. The findings for the limited number of tests performed on polymeric insulators have
only a weak agreement with this relationship.
In a similar exercise conducted by CESI for some a.c. insulators, it was shown that the average value of q was 0.35 - i.e. it lies
within the range (0.14 to 0.65) of the findings shown in Table 3-6.
Table 3-6: Value of q in equation 3-4 for ceramic insulators
DATA SOURCE
INSULATOR
ENERGISATION
POLLUTION
SL PARAMETER
SHAPE
Figure 3-11
Cylindrical
a.c.
Clean-fog
SCL
0.43
Table 10-24
Disc
a.c.
Salt-fog
SAL
0.41
Table 10-24
Disc
a.c.
Salt-fog
SCL
0.74
Table 10-24
Cylindrical
a.c.
Salt-fog
SAL
0.24
Table 10-24
Cylindrical
a.c.
Salt-fog
SCL
0.14
Table 10-25
Disc
a.c.
Marine
SCL
0.50
Table 10-27
Cylindrical
d.c.
Clean-fog
SCL
0.37
Table 10-32
Disc
d.c.
Clean-fog
SCL
0.49
Table 10-33
Cylindrical
d.c.
Clean-fog
SAL
0.50
Table 10-33
Cylindrical
d.c.
Clean-fog
SCL
0.51
As to the general fit of the results to equation 3-4 for positive values of q, the trend seems to be that the SCL parameter is a
better one to use for disc insulators than the SAL parameter. However, for cylindrical insulators there is no clear advantage of
one parameter over the other.
1999-09-01
50
this standard test, the relative performance of EPDM to porcelain was far greater than that occurring under natural pollution
121
.
A difference of ranking has also been observed with d.c. insulators when the Salt-Fog test and the Clean-Fog test were used81,
as amply shown in Table 10-38.
Further, the rankings from the viewpoint of axial stress and surface stress along d.c. insulators have been found to be
substantially different 319 320, as seen in Table 10-36 and Table 10-37.
Therefore, these differences of ranking and the need to obtain more valid data on the absolute flashover voltage values for
polymeric insulators when subjected to the various types of artificial pollution indicate an area of research were a substantial
amount of work still needs to be done.
Uw/L (kV/m)
U50/L (kV/m)
Uw/L (kV/m)
180
160
140
120
100
80
(a) Salt-fog method, 28 kg/m3
Figure 3-15: d.c. Pollution performance of various polymeric insulators under different laboratory pollution test methods.
Uw is the withstand voltage; U50 is the 50% flashover voltage; L is the axial spacing between insulator fittings. (Data are
obtained from Pargamin et al 315; the bottom line of each insulator is positioned in respect to the voltage values).
1999-09-01
51
Improved natural cleaning as the orientation changes from being vertical to being horizontal.
Directional effects of pollution deposit for angled/horizontal orientation from a localised (direction-defined) pollution
source.
3. Inter-shed breakdown due to heavy rain and pollution.
4. Inter-shed breakdown due to pollution and poor profile.
5. Reduced flashover strength due to pollution concentration on the lower surface of horizontal, or near-horizontal,
insulation during heavy fog or rain.
In reality, there is no real substitute for testing insulators under the appropriate pollution and wetting conditions to determine
how actual insulator designs will perform in different orientations. Although there is a dearth of published data to quantify
these effects, this section - nevertheless - presents and discusses a few results of investigations into the influence of orientation
and size on the flashover strength of polluted insulation of various designs. Experimental results from artificial pollution tests
and from outdoor marine testing stations for various insulators and orientations are analysed to investigate if some simplified
conclusions can be drawn from the data.
3.3.3.2 Insulators
The influence of orientation and size are analysed and discussed for the following types of insulation:
1. Cap-and-pin insulators.
2. Polymeric insulators.
3. Substation post insulators with alternate long-and-short sheds (ALS) and multiple cone type profiles.
4. Tapered bushing porcelains with ALS profiles.
5. d.c. Wall bushings.
6. Interrupter head porcelains with open profiles.
Unfortunately, there seems to be no corresponding data for porcelain longrod insulators.
The results reported herein on the hollow porcelains have been obtained for insulators that were sealed with end-flanges and
pressurised with either dry nitrogen or SF6, to avoid having internal surface discharges. In general, hollow insulators have
been tested without their internal grading components because such items complicate the test assembly, but do not affect the
pollution flashover process - because it is not an electrostatic-field problem. Salt-Fog test results on a complete SF6 / Air
bushing confirm the validity of testing only the porcelains.
1999-09-01
52
The findings are summarised in Table 3-7. They are given both as a figure of merit (FOM) - i.e. a measure of relative axial
stress - and as a leakage path ratio - i.e. a measure of relative surface stress; the definition of these terms is provided beneath
this table. Note: the corresponding value of FOM=1 was obtained for type I insulators when vertically mounted.
Table 3-7: Cap and pin ceramic insulators, angled or near-horizontally mounted - a.c. flashover performance under marine
pollution at BITS *.
RANKING
NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
Notes:
*
**
***
****
*****
INSULATOR TYPE **
ORIENTATION ***
II antifog
I, antifog
I, antifog
VII L.C. antifog
II antifog
VIII Standard disc
H
H
A
H
A
H
FOM ****
(AVERAGE)
1.35
1.31
1.27
1.12
1.11
0.79
LPR *****
1.37
1.32
1.27
1.20
1.14
1.16
The results from Noto Testing Station, at a coastal location in Japan 59, also showed that tension strings have almost the same
- or a little higher - pollution flashover strength compared with that of suspension strings. These tests were similar to those
conducted at Brighton in that insulator strings were systematically increased in length until approximately equal flashover
frequencies were established for all of the tested insulators.
Tests conducted on contaminated (SDD = 0.02 mg/cm2) insulators of the IEEE type have shown that - based on the 50%
flashover strength - the long-string efficiency values are 95%, 92% and 90% for quasi-horizontal, V-string and vertical string
respectively111.
1
2
3
4
INSULATOR
TYPE ***
VII Silicone rubber
VI EPDM
VIII EPR
V EPDM
FOM ****
HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
>1.53
>1.53
1.28
1.12
1.19
1.17
1.14
1.21
LPR *****
HORIZONTAL
VERTICAL
>2.5
>2.5
>2.63
2.27
1.62
1.16
1.18
1.25
Notes:
*
**
***
****
1999-09-01
53
*****
LPR is leakage path ratio, determined as the leakage path of Test insulator divided by that of
the Reference insulator, for the same pollution flashover performance.
28
160
20
28
45
14
160
90
160
56 (front)
80 (rear)
1999-09-01
54
Figure 3-16: A.c. flashover voltage as a function of salinity of salt-fog for the insulator having a 65/45 70 profile and a total
creepage of 7600 mm for both vertical and horizontal cases 128.
Again it is seen that the flashover performance, in salt-fog, of a large diameter insulator is much inferior when in the
horizontal position as compared with that for the vertical one. The Quick Flashover tests for vertical mounting show a very
flat slope in the SAL versus fog salinity relationship (s=0.06) - thereby indicating significant air-breakdown. In contrast, the
corresponding data for the horizontal case demonstrate a significant increase in gradient (s=0.19) - with increased surface
discharge activity along the bottom insulator surface.
These heavy wetting test results confirm that this process does not significantly affect horizontal bushings but can reduce the
inter-shed breakdown capability of some bushings that have angles close to the vertical. The heavy wetting withstand of
160 kg/m3 when the insulator is vertical suggests that the large component of air breakdowns, indicated by the Quick
Flashover tests, were not from shed to shed.
1999-09-01
55
Figure 3-17: A..c. axial stress to cause flashover against fog salinity for various interrupter porcelains 129. V1 was vertically
mounted; H1, H2, H3, and H4 were horizontally mounted. Insulator details are provided in Table 10-23.
1999-09-01
56
For the insulator-string configuration, different pollution deposit densities will also be experienced on the discs making up the
string 131 318 38. Under d.c. energisation, those insulators situated towards the ends of the string will generally collect more
pollution than the ones in the middle131. This non-uniform pollution distribution also seems to affect the d.c. flashover
voltage, as is shown in Figure 3-19. This figure provides the d.c. fog-withstand voltage of a non-uniformly polluted string having the heavier polluted - i.e. 0.08 mg/cm2 - insulators situated towards the ends - as a function of the percentage of such
heavily polluted insulators in the string. It can be seen that for strings containing up to 30% of heavily polluted insulators, the
d.c. withstand voltage remains about the same as that of the insulator string uniformly polluted to the ESDD of its middle part
- i.e. 0.03 mg/cm2.
Figure 3-19: Withstand voltage characteristics of d.c. insulators polluted non-uniformly along a string 131. The insulator
details are provided in the reference.
In the case of gas-insulated bushings of the UHV a.c. class, it was observed at the NGK Laboratory that less pollution
collected on the earth -side of the bushings than did that on the live-side. This lighter polluted area covered 20-40% of the
overall bushing length. Tests indicated that the withstand voltage was reduced by about 6% for these non-uniformly polluted
bushings as compared with that for the uniformly polluted ones 132.
A study of the effect of non-uniform pollution on longrod insulators 65 has shown that the a.c. electrical strength of the longrod
may be adversely affected by the presence of insulator sections that are polluted to a lesser degree than the rest. For an
insulator with 30% of its length covered by a lighter degree of pollution, a 25% reduction in electrical strength was observed
as compared with that for the uniformly polluted insulator. Similar results may, possibly, be expected for d.c. energised
bushings.
1999-09-01
57
1999-09-01
58
Figure 3-20: A.c. flashover voltage versus number of semi-conducting glazed disc insulators in a suspension string, for
various wetting conditions142.
Using these findings for semiconducting glazed insulators, it is reasonable to conclude that the flashover strength of standard
glazed insulators when polluted and highly wetted - as can happen for cold switch-on or due to thermal lag - is at least 40%
less than that of the same polluted insulator under normal service conditions when its temperature is similar to -or greater than
that - of the surrounding air.
Also during cold switch-on, there may be transient over-stressing - as is discussed in Section 3.3.7.
1999-09-01
59
These transients may occur in various environmental conditions and may affect insulators characterised by various degrees of
contamination. In particular, a critical condition may arise when there is the simultaneous presence of pollution and wetting
on the insulator surface. The simulation of the above condition may require various pollution test procedures, according to
the peculiarity of the environment considered.
Many tests have been performed to investigate the pollution influence on the withstand characteristics of insulator
configurations under transient overvoltages 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157.
The available experimental information indicates that the presence of a wetted pollution layer may appreciably reduce the
strength, not only at operating voltage but also under transient voltages.
In the following discussion, the performance of external insulation under transient overvoltage will be reviewed with the aim
of obtaining indications about this reduction in strength.
3.3.7.2 General trends on the performance of contaminated insulators under transient voltages
A summary of published data relevant to the performance of contaminated insulators (suspension- and post-type) under
transient overvoltages is presented in the following sections.
Figure 3-21: LI flashover voltage of strings of cap and pin standard and antifog insulators as a function of insulator length.
Solid-Layer method, wet contaminant. Comparison with data for the dry condition 147.
3.3.7.2.1 LI performance
(a)
LI alone
The available data generally refer to the standard LI wave shape (1.2/50 s).
In Figure 3-21, the 50% flashover voltage of cap and pin insulator strings is given as a function of the string length. The
results were obtained by using the Solid-Layer method (wet contaminant) with a salt deposit density, SDD, ranging from 0.06
to 0.25 mg/cm2. For comparison purposes, the strength under the dry condition with positive LI is also provided. These
results indicate a substantial strength reduction due to the presence of pollution when compared to that for the dry condition.
This reduction tends to increase as the insulator length increases, thereby leading to non-linear characteristics. Therefore, it is
difficult to keep the LI withstand voltage of insulator strings higher than 3000 kV, particularly for standard units. The
strength of standard-type insulators is reduced for both polarities, resulting in values that are nearly equal. For antifog
insulators, the decrease is larger for negative polarity; which, therefore, represents the critical case.
1999-09-01
60
The influence of the pollution severity SDD on the reduction in strength is shown in Figure 3-22, which provides the specific
flashover voltage as a function of SDD of the contaminated layer. The performance of standard and of antifog cap and pin
insulators and of a smooth cylinder insulator have been considered. The data indicate that the reduction is practically constant
for SDD greater than 0.1 mg/cm2 for both positive and negative polarities. Further, the results show once again the
importance of the insulator profile. A strength as low as 200 kV/m was found for an insulator shape without sheds (i.e.
smooth glass cylinder).
Figure 3-22: LI flashover stress of cap and pin insulator strings and of a post insulator model as a function of pollution
severity. Solid-Layer method (wet contaminant) 146.
(b)
LI superimposed on a.c.
Results from Lushnikoff146 indicate that dry bands on the surface of polluted insulators cause a further appreciable lowering of
the impulse strength of heavily polluted insulators. This reduction is about 30-40% with reference to the strength obtained
with LI only. Without such dry bands, the strength reduction is only 10-20%.
3.3.7.2.2 SI performance
(a)
SI alone
As for air gaps, an influence of the impulse wave shape is to be expected for contaminated insulators. Unfortunately, few data
are available for this case 148 149 - and they refer to rather short insulator lengths (1 to 2 m), thus not allowing accurate
indications to be obtained. However, as a general guide, the strength tends to be lower as the impulse-duration increases.
Most of the investigations were carried out with impulse wave shapes close to the standard one (250/2500 s) and of positive
polarity, which is also the critical one under contaminated conditions. Consequently, in the following account, the main
attention will be paid to standard impulse wave shapes of positive polarity.
The presence of wetted pollution can cause a large reduction in the flashover voltage with respect to that for the dry condition,
as provided by the set of data given in Figure 3-23. This shows the strength of cap and pin insulator strings as a function of the
string length (data derived from Okada et al145, and Hiroshe et al149, obtained with the Solid-Layer method and a SDD within
the range from 0.05 to 0.23 mg/cm2). Again it is seen that the insulator profile plays a major role; the reduction with standard
type insulators is much larger than that with the antifog one.
1999-09-01
61
Figure 3-23: SI flashover voltage of cap and pin insulators as a function of string length (d). Solid-Layer method, wet
contaminant 145 149.
The strength reduction depends largely on the pollution severity, as evident from Figure 3-24 (data derived from Carrara and
Sforzini143 and Hiroshe et al149, obtained with Salt-Fog and Solid-Layer methods, respectively).
Figure 3-24: SI flashover voltage of cap and pin insulators strings, presented in per unit of the flashover voltage in the dry
condition, as a function of pollution severity. Solid-Layer and Salt-Fog methods 143 149.
The data in Figure 3-24 show that the strength tends to decrease when the pollution severity is increased, even for a high
pollution severity.
(b)
Results obtained with standard and antifog cap and pin insulators, standard and antifog longrod insulators and post-type
insulators are summarised in Figure 3-25. The pollution tests have been performed using the Salt-Fog method with a test
severity ranging from 2.5 to 25 g/1. This figure shows the 50% flashover voltage (U50), normalised to the 50% flashover
voltage for a dry insulator with positive polarity (U50 dry+ ) as a function of severity for both positive and negative polarity.
For comparison purposes, corresponding data obtained with SI alone are also given.
1999-09-01
62
Figure 3-25: Pollution tests (Salt-Fog method) with SI preceded by a.c. energisation on cap and pin and longrod insulators.
Comparison with data relevant to SI alone 143 144.
It is evident that the a.c. pre-stress produces a reduction in the SI strength, which is more pronounced with negative polarity.
(c)
Results, relevant to standard and antifog cap and pin insulators and standard longrod insulators, are summarised in Figure 326. The data, obtained with the Salt-Fog method, indicate a strength reduction similar to that found for the case of SI
preceded by a.c. energisation.
Figure 3-26: Pollution tests (Salt-Fog method) with SI superimposed on a.c. energisation for cap and pin and longrod
insulators. Comparison with data relevant to SI alone 143 153.
(d)
Figure 3-27 shows the SI flashover voltage as a function of the d.c. pre-stress, in which both the amplitude and the polarity are
varied. The results were obtained by using the Solid-Layer method (wet contaminant) with a fixed test severity (SDD = 0.04
mg/cm2).
1999-09-01
63
Figure 3-27: Pollution tests (Solid-Layer method) on insulator columns with SI superimposed on d.c. energisation153.
Again, the data indicate that the pre-stress may have an appreciable adverse influence on the strength. It is evident that this
strength reduction is strongly influenced by increasing the amplitude of the pre-stress voltage.
(e)
As suggested by Cortina et al 153, the additional strength reduction found with composite voltages may be attributed to the dry
bands formed by the applied pre-stress. Tests made without pre-stress but with a non-uniform distribution of pollution (dry
bands simulation) gave results similar to those obtained with pre-stress applied to uniformly contaminated insulators, as
shown in the example of Figure 3-28.
1999-09-01
64
Figure 3-29: Pollution tests on longitudinal circuit breaker insulation with TO. Flashover voltage vs. overvoltageapplication duration157.
Pre-stressing also affects the strength with TO154 157. Examples of results obtained with such a pre-stress are shown in Figure
3-30 154. With pre-stressing, the strength becomes very close to that for a permanent voltage when the voltage applicationduration is of a few seconds.
1999-09-01
65
Figure 3-30: Pollution test on suspension type insulators with TO preceded by a.c. energisation. Flashover voltage vs.
overvoltage application-duration 154.
Related information when no pre-stressing is present is shown in Figure 3-31 158 for two types of insulator that were both
subjected to a salt-fog of 2.5 kg/m3 salinity for 5 minutes and then suddenly energised.
A useful comparison is the ratio of the impulse flashover voltage to that for normal stressing. Such information for the a.c.
reference case, i.e. disc insulators and no pre-stressing, is illustrated in Figure 3-32 159 as a function of the duration of the
impulse waveform (stated as the time for which the voltage is greater than 50% of the peak value). Also included in this
diagram are a few results that apply to the corresponding temporary a.c. overvoltage condition (in this case, the duration is the
time for which the 50Hz voltage is applied before flashover occurs).
Figure 3-31: Short duration a.c. flashover tests in salt-fog (Insulators suddenly energised after 5 minutes of fog)158.
1999-09-01
66
5
Lightning wave
Notes:
(1) Length of horizontal lines represents the duration
that the voltage is greater than 50% of the peak value.
(2) Length of vertical lines represents the spread of the
results
3
Switching surge
2
a.c. overvoltage
1
1
10
100
1000
Duration of energisation (s)
10000
100000
1000000
Figure 3-32: Comparison of the short duration stressing strength for positive polarity impulses with the normal a.c. stressing
strength for a 9-unit string of disc insulators without pre-established dry bands on a very heavily polluted surface.
Note: Peak of normal a.c. F/O voltage = 100 kV159.
Figure 3-33: Tests on an insulator column: Ratio between the positive SI strength and the a.c. strength as a function of the
insulator length. Solid-Layer method, wet contaminant, SDD = 0.04 mg/cm2 152.
1999-09-01
67
In contrast, the SI strength is closer to that under a.c. energisation. For example, Figure 3-33 shows the ratio between SI and
a.c. strength as a function of the insulator length (data from Garbagnati et al 152, obtained with Solid-Layer method).
This latter figure indicates that, at least for the configuration considered, the ratio decreases with insulator length - reaching
values as low as 1.3 - 1.5 p.u. for very long insulators. When compared to the strength with possible switching overvoltage
stresses (usually higher than 1.5 p.u.), the importance of the SI condition for design purpose appears evident.
The strength under TO can be very close to that under a.c. energisation (see Figure 3-29, Figure 3-30 and Figure 3-32).
E
=
E0 0
where:
E
E0
b
(3-5)
It is appropriate to note that the above mentioned finding of the decrease in the value of the flashover voltage with reduction
in air density has been observed when the temperature was kept constant. Ocampo 160 has found that the effect of a lower
temperature can neutralise or even reverse the effect of air density, thereby improving the insulator performance instead of
reducing it.
Since the electrolyte path is much longer than the air-gap path on a typical insulator under service conditions, it is usually
assumed that the electrolyte path dominates the flashover process and that the above equation can be used to describe the
whole process with an acceptable degree of accuracy. However, with sheds having deep ribs this approximation may not
always be valid.
Rizk and Rezazada 23 have updated the mathematical model previously established 7 161 19, to include for the effect of reduced
air density on the flashover voltage. This was done by introducing the effect of ambient pressure on the physical parameter of
the dielectric recovery equation. These authors also referred to the case of sheds with deep ribs.
The performance has been investigated using real insulators in both the laboratory 162 163 164 and under various altitude
conditions 165 166 167 168 169 170 and in simulation experiments involving a thin layer of electrolyte 166 171 172 173. A consistent
value of the index b - 0.5 and 0.35 for the a.c. and d.c. case respectively - has been found, bearing in mind the accuracy with
which the 50% flashover value can be determined for polluted insulators.
Relatively little work has been done on actual strings to assess the performance under impulse (both lightning and switching)
for polluted insulators 174. The most consistent work has been done in simulated situations with an electrolyte layer 175 176. In
this work, an attempt has been made to separate the role played by the air gap and that played by the electrolyte. For
Lightning Impulses, the total effect is a direct dependency on air density - giving b = 1.
Under Switching impulse conditions, a more complex situation arises with significant polarity differences resulting in a much
greater reduction for the positive case. The index for positive polarity is approximately the same as that for a.c. - that is, b
approaches 0.5.
E = E0 (1 0.035h)
1999-09-01
(3-6)
68
2. a.c. Conditions
E = E0 (1 0.05h )
(3-7)
E = E0 (1 01
. h)
(3-8)
E = E0 (1 0.050h )
(3-9)
Ews (kV/m) *
ICE DENSITY
(g/cm3)
IEEE
Antifog
EPDM
Post type
0.87
70
84
96
90
Rime
< 0.3
> 148
> 146
> 168
> 197
The amount of ice, including its length and the number of icicles, as well as the thickness of the ice-layer on the insulator
surface considerably influence the flashover voltage. Some writers 191 have reported that the withstand voltage of insulators
that had their shed-spacing completely bridged by artificial icicles was about 60% of the value for the case without ice. Figure
3-34 179 shows the variation in the maximum withstand stress of a 6-unit string of IEEE standard insulators that were covered
with artificial wet-grown ice. These results are presented as a function of ice thickness on the monitoring cylinder and the
corresponding weight of ice per metre of insulator string. The value of ice-thickness at which the withstand voltage levels off
was about 2.5 cm for these insulators. It was also found 177 that this value (between 2.0 and 3.0 cm for the tested insulators)
depends on the shed- or unit-diameter, shed spacing and type of insulator.
When the ice-thickness is much lower than 1 mm and the insulators are pre-contaminated, conductive ions from the pollution
tend to dominate the total electrical conductivity of the ice 180. Consequently, a flashover stress level as low as 20 kV per
metre of leakage distance has been obtained.
The presence of the voltage during ice-accretion affects the ice distribution along the insulators. In many cases, some sections
of the insulator may be free of ice 111. This is due to ice melting and/or falling away - caused by the heating effect of the
surface arcs and/or an increase in air temperature. This situation is especially the case for long insulator strings and it has also
been observed during laboratory tests 359. Accordingly, a non-linear relationship between the withstand voltage and the stringlength can be expected.
1999-09-01
69
Figure 3-34: Maximum a.c. withstand stress as a function of the amount of ice 179.
The influence of freezing water conductivity on the flashover of ice-covered insulators has been studied and reported by
several authors 94 177 179 181 182. In general, the higher the conductivity, the lower is the flashover voltage. Figure 3-35 shows
an example of the decrease in the maximum withstand stress Ews as a function of freezing-water conductivity - as measured at
20oC. These results were obtained using a string of 6 IEEE insulator units, tested at an air temperature of -12oC and an ice
thickness of 2.0 cm on the rotating monitoring cylinder 179. The decrease in maximum withstand stress in this paper was
expressed by using the following equation:
Ews = 165.3 -0.18
(3-10)
for 150 S/cm
being the conductivity of the freezing water in S/cm and Ews, the maximum withstand stress in kV/m.
Figure 3-35: Variation of the maximum a.c. withstand stress of the insulators as a function of the freezing-water conductivity
179
.
However, in some cases, the conductivity can lead to a reverse effect - i.e. an increase in the conductivity leading to higher
flashover values. This phenomenon is associated with the falling away of the ice caused by melting due to surface arcs. The
effect of freezing rain conductivity on the flashover voltage may also depend on the insulator-type as well as on the
experimental conditions. In some studies 183 358 359 177 182, the flashover voltage reduced even for much higher conductivity
values.
b) d.c. Voltage
Unfortunately the research work to date193 184 185 186 has provided little information on the effect of ice on the flashover voltage
of insulators energised under d.c. voltage. It has been reported that this flashover voltage is, in general, lower under negative
d.c. energisation than it is under positive d.c. energisation. In a series of tests carried out on a short string of IEEE standard
insulators that were covered with glaze 187, it was found that the maximum withstand stress was about 17% lower under
negative d.c. than positive d.c. stressing of the insulator.
1999-09-01
70
Notes:
Hollow marks show results for wet conditions
Marks , and ---- show flashover of stacks covered with
ice for positive switching surge.
Five flashover data
Five withstand data
Figure 3-36: Positive and negative flashover voltage characteristics of solid core cylindrical post insulator for switching
impulse voltage with a front time of 120 to 140 s 188.
a) a.c. Voltage
The a.c. withstand (flashover) voltage decreases with increasing water conductivity from the melted snow, and with increasing
snow-density up to 0.5 g/cm3. Thereafter, it remains constant. The minimum withstand (flashover) voltage has been measured
when the entire insulator string was covered with snow. Figure 3-37 shows the relation between withstand voltage and the
snow-density 189.
150
: Naturally Snow -Covered
: Artificially Snow -Covered
100
uS/cm
20
30
50
100
50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Figure 3-37: Relation between a.c. withstand voltage and snow-density 189.
1999-09-01
71
0.5
0.6
b) Temporary Overvoltage
The time to flashover becomes shorter as the temporary a.c. overvoltage becomes higher - as is shown in Figure 3-38. If the
temporary overvoltage continues for 0.1 second, the withstand voltage per metre of insulator assembly covered with snow is
about 95 kV/m. That is, about 20% higher than the a.c. withstand voltage at the volume density of the snow of 0.3 to 0.4
g/cm3 314 190.
Figure 3-38: Temporary a.c. overvoltage and time to flashover 314 190.
(c)
d.c. Voltage
The d.c. withstand voltage of an insulator covered with snow is approximately equal to the effective value of its a.c. withstand
voltage when the quantity of snow covering the insulator is the same. Regardless of the contamination severity on the
insulator, the d.c. withstand voltage depends on the snow-density and the conductivity of the water melted from this snow
covering 191 192.
The negative-polarity application usually results in a lower withstand level of snow-covered insulators
corresponding positive-polarity case.
191
Figure 3-39: Relationship between snow-density and d.c. withstand voltage of insulators artificially covered with snow 192.
Figure 3-39 shows the relationship between snow-density and d.c. maximum withstand voltage of insulators with an artificial
snow covering 192.
1999-09-01
72
FOV Without
AC Voltage
Less than 50
Less than 60
300
200
40
60
80
100
Percentage length of insulator covered with snow
Figure 3-40: Relation between switching impulse 50 % flashover voltage and the percentage of snow-covered length of
insulator193.
Linearity has been found between the switching-impulse flashover voltage and the length of an insulator covered with snow
(up to 6m of string-length).
e) Lightning impulse voltage.
The positive-polarity lightning-impulse flashover voltage of an insulator assembly - with a 2 m horn gap-length - that is
covered with snow with a volume density of 0.3 g/cm3, is about 35% lower than that of the assembly without snow. The
negative-polarity flashover voltage is at its lowest when the whole insulator assembly is covered with snow 194.
1999-09-01
73
1999-09-01
74
The investigation of these flashovers revealed a strongly non-uniform axial electric field with a high concentration of voltage
towards the bottom part of the porcelain shell - due to a non-uniform pollution deposit. The bushing had a complex shed
profile with a double-rib geometry and a deep inter-shed cavity. Also there was a small inter-shed clearance. It was
concluded that the light pollution level did contribute to the flashovers due to its non-uniform distribution on the bushing.
The discussion on the effect of a non-uniform pollution deposit can be found in Section 3.3.4.
UL
U50
UP
-U p
U L=2U p
100
Up
0
0.10
1.00
t (s)
10.00
100.00
Figure 3-41: 50 % flashover voltage as a function of the a.c. overvoltage duration (single cycle)290.
Using a solid pollution layer of kaolin plus NaCl and steam fog, the 50% flashover voltage of the interrupter heads inclined at
45o to the vertical is shown in Figure 3-41 as a function of time for which the stressing is applied. Two conditions have been
investigated. In the first case, one terminal was energised and the other terminal was earthed; in the second case, the terminals
were energised with opposite polarity voltages. These results show the important finding that the flashover voltage is not
1999-09-01
75
much greater than the permanent a.c. values for an energised duration greater than one second. An intriguing fact is that the
two-terminal voltage application values were 15% higher than those for the corresponding one-terminal case.
The results on the pollution performance of circuit breakers have quite a spread in values. This can be caused by the different
profile and diameter of the hollow insulator, the arrangement of the interrupter units, the influence of the active parts and the
presence of various insulators in parallel (e.g. those of grading capacitors). It is, therefore, clear that extrapolation and
generalisation of the results are rather difficult to make.
As an example, comparative tests 157 aimed at analysing the influence of the active parts have shown that, for a specific
breaker, the required creepage distance for the longitudinal insulation of the breaker was about 10% higher than that for the
corresponding hollow insulators without active parts. It is reasoned that larger differences can be expected for certain
constructions that have a highly variable electric field.
As general remarks:
The influence of various breaker components on the surface withstand is not easy to identify. Tests to obtain information
about the breaker performance in service should be made - as far as possible - on a complete breaker. That is, one
equipped with active parts and accessories (capacitors, resistors, etc.) and assembled as per in service.
Additional investigations are needed to obtain a better understanding of the influence of the various breaker parameters
on the surface withstand voltage. This is very important, because the spread of the results indicates that there is scope to
achieve improvements in the pollution flashover performance - by properly modifying the breaker design (e.g. varying the
insulator profile, increasing the distance between hollow insulator and active parts, etc).
1999-09-01
76
Figure 3-43: Cold switch-on a.c. flashover voltage as a function of string length 111.
Due to the voltage grading achieved by the semiconducting glaze, the radio interference performance of these insulators is
superior to that of ceramic and polymeric insulators 211.
The issue of constant heat-energy dissipation - and thereby its economic penalty - should be considered in any widespread
application of semiconducting glaze insulators.
3.5 Conclusions
The pollution flashover performance of porcelain and glass insulators is generally good, but problems have occurred in
service in a few places.
The pollution flashover strength of some polymeric materials - especially silicone rubber - is superior to that of glass and
1999-09-01
77
porcelain. In contrast, epoxy resin rapidly degrades from its new - hydrophobic - condition such that its flashover
strength can be somewhat inferior to that of the ceramic materials.
Service experience has demonstrated that the performance of polymeric insulators is adequate if the insulators have been
properly dimensioned. Such insulators have, therefore, seen increasing application in recent times.
The classic materials used for outdoor insulators, i.e. glass and glazed porcelain, are well described in the literature.
Polymeric materials are, however, much more diverse and manufacturers choose a particular formulation adapted to the
process and the characteristics required of the finished product.
Many factors other than axial length or creepage path length are known to influence insulator performance. Differences
in the behaviour of insulators in various orientations may be due to the accumulation of pollution, the effect of natural
washing and the physical characteristics of surface discharges.
The ratio of best to worst insulator performance - as assessed by different research groups and for different types of
pollution in terms of average surface stress, at withstand or flashover, for the same pollution conditions and vertical
mounting - has been found to vary. For the surface stress, this ratio is as follows:
1. Ceramic insulators, between 1.5 to 2 and 1.4 to 2.3 for a.c. and d.c. energisation respectively,
2. Polymeric insulators, between 1.4 to > 4.7 and 1.2 to 1.8 for a.c. and d.c. energisation respectively.
The corresponding ratios are somewhat lower for average axial stress. The ranking of more than 120 types of ceramic
insulators and nearly 30 types of polymeric ones provides additional information that could be usefully employed for
assessing the likely pollution flashover performance of an insulator of a given material, profile and size.
For all insulators, the specific length needs to be increased as the pollution severity increases. Although there can be a
large spread in the experimental results, there are some clear trends (e.g. for the porcelain longrod) that support the use
of a power-law relationship between specific length (SL) - i.e. specific axial length and specific creepage length - and
pollution severity (S); i.e. SL = KS s where K and s are constants. Typically for a.c. energisation, s = 0.2 for the longrod
porcelain insulator and - generally - about the same magnitude for some other shapes of cylindrical-type porcelain
insulators and for standard disc-type insulators. A further complicating feature is that the ranking of insulators can
change from test method to test method, as evidenced by some d.c. tests using (a) the Salt-Fog test, (b) the Clean-Fog
test and (c) a Dust-spray method.
Using a comprehensive set of data for standard disc insulators, it is possible to find a correlation - for a.c. energisation between the pollution-scale of the Salt-Fog test with that of the Clean-Fog test.
From a detailed study of insulator profile for d.c. applications, it has been clearly shown that a significant improvement
in performance cannot be achieved by increasing only the creepage distance in a given axial length.
For a.c. energisation, the pollution flashover performance of disc insulators is essentially linear with string length for a
voltage up to 300 kV in a Clean-Fog test and up to 700 kV when subjected to natural pollution. Further, it is only
moderately non-linear for higher voltages; being about 10% greater than that for the linear extrapolation for a voltage of
800 kV in a Clean-Fog test. Post insulators seem to be more non-linear than is the corresponding case for disc
insulators. Although the situation for d.c. insulators is less clear than that of the a.c. ones, there are some indications that
- at voltages around 800 kV - the non-linearity effect is more pronounced than the corresponding case for a.c.
energisation.
Generally for vertically mounted insulators, there is some experimental support for expressing specific length (SL) related to either axial stress or surface stress - as a power-law dependence on average diameter (D) for given pollution
and voltage conditions; i.e. SL = Dq where and q are constants. The best support for this relationship occurs with
porcelain housings in which the profile remains essentially constant and only the diameter is varied. Typical values are
q= 0.4 and q=0.5 for the a.c. and d.c. cases respectively. For more varied changes in profile, the spread in the data
increases; none-the-less, the data for a.c. disc insulators provide moderately good support for such a power-law with
q=0.7. An intriguing and puzzling finding is that q can be negative for porcelain d.c. insulators in which there is a
substantial variation in profile over the range of D studied. For polymeric housing insulators, there is some evidence to
show that the flashover strength decreases as the diameter increases, but the variation is much less than that for the
porcelain case.
The improved performance of cap-and-pin insulators when inclined compared to that for the vertical orientation has been
confirmed in both natural and artificial pollution tests.
The artificial pollution performance of horizontal post-type insulators is much inferior to that of the same insulators
when vertically mounted.
There is some evidence to show that the alternate long-and-short shed (ALS) profiles may not represent the most
efficient insulator shape for horizontal post and bushing-type designs.
Correction factors for orientation have been identified for some insulator types.
1999-09-01
78
More natural pollution test data are required for inclined post-type insulators to establish relative flashover performance
compared to that of the same insulators when vertically installed.
The pollution flashover performance of large diameter insulators - e.g. an interrupter head - when horizontally mounted,
is substantially inferior to the corresponding vertical one. A similar finding is known for tapered bushing porcelains
when subjected to artificial salt-fog.
A non-uniform spread of pollution on insulators may have a significant effect on its flashover performance. A higher top
to bottom ratio of pollution spread on vertically mounted strings of disc insulators leads to a lower flashover strength.
The electrical strength of bushings and longrod insulators may also be adversely affected if some sections of the
insulator are less polluted than the rest.
Some types of discharge activity (e.g. corona from raindrops) at or near the surface of polymeric insulators may cause
severe degradation of the material thereby reducing the flashover performance. Such discharges can be prevented, or
minimised, by having the correct design of stress ring.
A large number of electric field calculation programmes are available, based on different calculation methods. For
insulators without any discharge activity, good agreement can be achieved between measurements and predictions based
on the different calculation methods. However, when discharges are present the situation is much more complicated and
so - unfortunately - an accurate calculation of the electric-field around the insulator is not possible at this stage.
The flashover strength of insulators that are suddenly energised (i.e. cold switch-on) can be at least 40% less than that of
the same insulators when continuously energised in the same pollution environment.
Contamination can significantly reduce the flashover strength of insulators under transient overvoltages (i.e. Lightning
impulse, Switching surge, system voltage disturbances) when compared with the corresponding situation for dry (clean)
conditions.
The flashover strength of polluted insulators reduces as the altitude of the location increases. The extent of this
reduction depends upon the wave shape of the voltage, but for practical situations (i.e. altitude up to about 3000m) this
decrease will be less than 20% of the appropriate sea-level value.
The flashover voltage of an ice- or snow-covered insulator depends on the type of precipitation, the conductivity of the
water when melting occurs, the extent of bridging of the air gaps (e.g. by icicles), the accretion thickness (e.g. snow up to
30 mm) and the density of snow and ice. When icicles span most of the insulator, the probability of flashover at
operating voltage during the melting stage is relatively high. There is linearity between the flashover voltage and the
insulator length for axial lengths of up to 1.0 m. For longer insulators, this relationship can be highly non-linear. The
switching surge strength of insulators can decrease by 50% when the insulator becomes covered with ice. Linearity
between the SI voltage and the insulator length is maintained for strings up to 6 m long when covered with snow.
A minimum in a U-shaped SI voltage: snow-covering relationship occurs when 60% to 80% of the insulators length is
covered with snow.
Hollow insulators or shells may have a lower flashover performance than that of comparable solid insulators due to the
influence of both the electric field and heat from internal components. It is thought essential to design the structure to
achieve a uniform axial-voltage distribution on the surface of the shell.
HVDC wall bushings having untreated porcelain shells have suffered a number of flashovers, which is usually due to
non-uniform wetting along the surface. An effective countermeasure is to use a silicone grease or coating to achieve a
hydrophobic surface. A bushing with silicone rubber sheds is another promising solution to this problem.
Tests to obtain information about circuit breaker performance in service should be made, as far as possible, on a
complete breaker that is equipped with its active parts and accessories and assembled as it would be in service.
Additional investigations are needed to obtain a deeper understanding of the influence of the various breaker-parameters
on the surface withstand voltage.
In some desert regions, the flashover of ceramic insulators is a problem - even with a specific creepage length of 52
mm/kV system voltage. However, it is encouraging to note that polymeric insulators seem to have a reasonably good
pollution flashover performance in these difficult locations.
By using a semiconducting glaze to achieve a continuous leakage current of about 1 mA, sufficient heating of the
insulator surface is achieved to keep it dry in dew or fog - thereby greatly increasing the pollution flashover performance
compared with that of a normally glazed insulator. Cold switch-on, however, remains a problem with insulators treated
in this way. Although such a glaze has been found to have a long and effective life on post insulators, rapid deterioration
has taken place around the pin of disc insulators in severe marine pollution. Semiconducting glaze is not recommended
for d.c. insulators.
1999-09-01
79
4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Even without flashover, the presence of pollutants together with wetting on insulators may cause serious side effects on the
power system and on the environment. Leakage current flow across the insulator surface can be a source of annoyance to
people, or interfere with communication systems, etc. These side effects can be classified as follows:
Direct nuisances
Visible discharges
Audible noise (AN)
Radio interference (RI)
Television interference (TVI)
Indirect nuisances
Corrosion of metal hardware, leading to interference or risk to persons
Fires arising from leakage-current discharges
In this section a review of each of the above is given.
Visible discharges can be a source of severe annoyance to people, especially where a line is passing through a populated area.
As shown in Figure 4-1, a pollution severity of only one-tenth of that which is necessary for flashover to happen is sufficient
for audible and/or visual corona discharges 212 to occur.
20
18
16
14
Withstand voltage characteristics of
320mm suspension insulator
12
10
8
6
4
2
0.01
0.02 0.03
0.1
0.2 0.25
1.0
1.7
SDD, mg/cm2
Figure 4-1: Audible noise/ Visible Corona characteristic of suspension insulators under a.c. energisation 212.
Frequent hot-line washing is an effective measure to minimise the occurrence of visible discharges213. The use of robot
technology may be advantageous, as very frequent washing is required and the quantity of water used should be kept to a
minimum in populated areas214.
The application of hydrocarbon or silicone grease or RTV coatings may also be effective but regular renewing will be
required (see 8.3.3). In the case of porcelain insulators, their manufacture with a semiconducting glaze (see 3.4.5) can also
reduce discharges.
1999-09-01
80
corona or arcing can give rise to complaints when lines cross densely populated areas. The noise level attenuation
characteristics for the various types of interference are illustrated in Figure 4-2.
RI
TVI
AN
80
RI*
60
AN*
40
TVI*
20
20
30
50
100
300
500
Figure 4-2: Lateral profile of RI, TVI and AN caused by partial flashover 217.
To avoid single-unit flashovers, the installation of insulator units with high individual flashover voltages has proved to be
effective. Hot line washing is also an effective counter measure, as is the application of silicone grease and RTV coatings219.
Once again, regular renewal of grease or coatings will be necessary (see 8.2.2).
Another form of audible noise from insulators is wind-howl, induced aerodynamically54, on certain profiles. This can be
avoided or suppressed by using different profiled-insulators or by modifying the profile with the addition of a polymeric part.
This measure changes the airflow around the insulator string, thereby preventing the resonance condition.
RIV, dB above 1 V
120
100
No.1
No.9
80
60
No.2&3
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.1
0.2
0.4
mg/cm2
Figure 4-3: Influence of salt deposit density on RIV at a measurement frequency of 1 MHz 215 216.
Some small-scale investigations222 conducted in a laboratory found that the RIV level - for a.c. energisation - of a wet and
polluted silicone rubber insulator, when aged, was substantially lower that that of two corresponding ceramic ones - a
porcelain longrod and a short-string of standard glass discs. The silicone rubber insulator also had a lower RIV level than
polymeric insulators made of EPDM and epoxy resin. Related large-scale tests, conducted using an outdoor facility, have
1999-09-01
81
established the beneficial effect of employing stress grading rings for both silicone rubber insulators and EPDM ones. These
test findings are in general agreement with service experience in Eskom's transmission lines in South Africa.
Radio interference may be severe around d.c. lines when the so-called single-unit flashovers occur 216 217 218. The noise level
and attenuation characteristics are shown in Figure 4-2. Measures to prevent the occurrence of such single-unit flashovers are
discussed in the foregoing section.
RIV, dB above 1 V
80
Contaminated
and fog
Clean and fog
60
40
20
0.5
1.0
2.0
Frequency, MHz
5.0
10.0
Rust Layer
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
50
70
90
110
130
150 170
190
210
230
250
Frequency, MHz
Figure 4-5: Equivalent circuit for an insulator string with corroded hardware and an example of the noise profile caused 72.
1999-09-01
82
Since the insulating properties of the corrosion layer are the cause of the problem, two effective counter measures are the
application of: (a) added weights that mechanically break the corrosion layer and (b) bridging the corrosion layer by
connecting a bonding wire between the line and the insulator hardware. 223
Areas where the insulators remain clean. They are generally characterised by the absence of contaminating
phenomena and frequent natural insulator washing due to rain or high and frequent dew condensation.
Type B areas:
Areas where the insulators become slightly polluted. They are generally characterised by low-intensity
contaminating phenomena and by cleaning agents such as rain or heavy dew condensation that limit the
contaminant accumulation on the insulator surface so that the formation of discharges across dry bands
appears seldom.
Type C areas:
Areas in which the insulators become polluted so that the formation of discharges across dry bands is
frequent.
In type A areas, the radio noise level on insulators decreases with an increase in the relative humidity of the air. In the
presence of condensation without water drops, the radio noise behaviour is similar to that of the same insulator under 90-95%
relative humidity. With the presence of water drops, the level of radio noise increases. However, it is less than that for
conductors under the same conditions.
Insulators installed in type B areas behave similarly to those situated in type A areas. That is, there is a lower radio noise
level for a higher humidity. However, certain types of insulator - designed for low radio noise in clean areas - may exhibit
higher noise levels at high levels of relative humidity. In the presence of condensation without water drops, the radio noise
behaviour is similar to that of the same insulator under 90-95% relative humidity. As for clean insulators, the radio noise
spectrum of slightly polluted insulators is similar to that of the conductor.
Table 4-1: Recommended radio noise limits and appropriate test methods224 225.
TYPE OF AREA WHERE
THE INSULATOR WILL BE
INSTALLED (AS ABOVE)
TEST METHODS
Ec+23
Ec+15
Ec = 50 % fair weather radio noise voltage level produced by the conductor at 20 m from the outer phase of the line
(dB/1 V/m)
Notes:
1. The limits reported in the table are applicable to lines characterised by a conductor-noise level close to the maximum admissible
one (voltage gradients higher than 12 - 14 kV/cm).
For lines of special design (having very low conductor noise), the direct application of the limits indicated in the table could lead to
uneconomical requirements for the insulators. To avoid this, the formula given in the table could be utilised provided Ec is
intended for the conductors of a line of the same category (voltage level, tower geometry, region etc.) but with a normal conductor
design.
2. The values in the table apply to line insulators. Similar approaches can be applied to substation insulators in respect to the noise
in the substation itself and the noise conducted into the outgoing lines.
1999-09-01
83
For a relative humidity lower than 60-75%, the radio noise behaviour of insulators installed in type C areas is similar to that
of those located in type A or B areas. For higher humidity and for droplet condensation, however, the dry-band activity
produces very high noise levels. These nuisances can be controlled by reducing the electric stress or by using special
insulators. Alternatively, greasing or regular washing can be the solution.
The frequency spectrum of wet polluted insulators (Type C areas) with dry-band activity extends up to the higher frequencies.
The medium frequency reception and that for television viewing can then be disturbed.
Table 4-1 shows the recommendation of CISPR 18-2224
sets installed in the above defined areas.
225
for radio noise limits and appropriate test methods for insulator
Anode
Metal
Cathode
Fe
Fe
Fe2+
Wetted contaminant
=
Electrolyte
Electrolyte
Metal
Figure 4-7: Damaged insulator subjected to a.c. energisation and outdoor exposure on a 230 kV line (11 years' exposure)232.
1999-09-01
84
4.8 Fires
Leakage current activity on polluted insulators mounted on wooden tower structures may, in some particular circumstances,
cause or exacerbate the following environmental impacts (event a usually precedes event b):
a) Top-pole or whole-pole fires of wooden pole structures.
b) Fires in the nearby environment, vegetation etc.
It has been identified 233 234 235 that the mechanism responsible for the ignition of wooden tower structures may begin at any
point of attachment of metal-to-wood and, in some cases, even in the joints of wood-to-wood. The following conditions are
necessary for the start of this fire:
1. Sufficient leakage current magnitude on the wooden surface.
2. Concentration of a voltage drop at a discrete point in the wood, causing local arcing and - therefore - possible ignition.
Condition 1 particularly applies for severe pollution - caused by wet, soluble ion contaminants. A typical contaminant that
causes the burning of wood poles is a thick layer of sea salt which may build up, not only on the insulators but also on the
whole of one side of the pole, in a very short time during a strong sea-storm236. Then the leakage current may easily exceed
tens, and even hundreds, of milliampere. Laboratory tests have shown234, however, that much smaller leakage currents - i.e. in
the range of 10 mA - can cause ignition and fires on wood-pole structures.
Condition 2 is illustrated in Figure 4-8235 234, which shows the cross-section through a wood crossarm and the resistances
representing typical leakage currents paths. The wood in the "rain-shadow" zone near the metal bolt can often remain dry
during the moistening of the polluted insulator and the exposed wood surface. Due to the lowering of the resistance of the
wood that is exposed to the rain, that part of the wood has a small resistance (R2 ), whilst the dry wood maintains a high
resistance in the narrow localised zones (R1 and R3 ). The increased leakage current (I1 ) can cause arcing and so possibly, the
start of a fire if the ignition temperature is reached and a sufficient air supply is available.
Legend:
Darker coloured areas indicate a higher moisture content
Lighter coloured areas indicate a lower moisture content
I
I1
I2
R1, R3
C,
Brace bolt
D,
Guard electrode
Figure 4-8: Typical leakage paths through the wood crossarm; (a) is without and (b) is with the protective guard electrode
234
.
In practice, fires on the wood poles of distribution and sub-transmission lines usually occur at the metal-wood interfaces.
These include the insulator pins in the wood, the suspension insulator eyebolts, the cross-arm king-bolts and the arm bracebolts. In areas of very severe pollution, the build-up of soluble salts on the insulator and on the wood-pole surface can lead to
large leakage currents - which produce deep tracks at the metal-wood connections. Tracking may also be associated with the
pollution flashover of an insulator.
On HV and EHV wood-pole lines, crossarm fires may also occur due to large leakage currents across the primary insulation
when it is polluted. Fires have also been attributed237 to a high electric field that can be normal to the pole surface - as is
illustrated in Figure 4-9. If the surface layer of the pole is moist and contains pollution, the conducting wood acts as a
collector-electrode for the capacitive current ic. If this capacitive current is both sufficiently large and concentrated so as to
flow into a metal fastener of the earthed downlead, it may cause ignition and a pole fire. Even if there is no downlead, the
1999-09-01
85
capacitive current (ic) collected by the wet polluted surface layer may still cause a pole fire if it is collected by a metal nail,
coach screw or pole-step - because such current concentration may lead to arcing.
Figure 4-9: Model for EHV Fires showing capacitive coupling current into a metal fastener 237.
The main measure taken to prevent a wood-pole fire is the installation of a conducting bridge across the high-resistance zone
in the wood. Local bonding is usually employed to short-circuit dry zones formed by rain-shadows or poor metal-wood
contacts. An example is the guard electrode that is shown as D in Figure 4-8. This guard electrode is made in different forms,
such as:
a) Coachscrew fitted tightly into the crossarm or pole body.
b) Multi-spiked plate ("gang-nails") pressed or nailed into the wood over a critical zone.
c) Galvanised iron, aluminium or copper strips nailed to the wood.
d) Metal bands wrapped tightly around the wood.
e) A 10 cm-wide band of conducting paint applied near the metal-wood connection.
All kinds of such a guard electrode have to be connected to metal.
The original guard-electrode (Figure 4-8 b) is usually replaced by measures b) or c). These surface-type electrodes also
reduce the possibility of damage due to lightning currents.
With regard to the pollution on the insulators, it is useful to wash them or to apply other maintenance measures - particularly
greasing. But this measure is not effective when pollutant layers are formed quickly - as can occur by strong sea-storms.
Generally, the only solution against pole fires is to fit one of the various types of guard electrode so as to provide a low
resistance path over a dry-wood zone.
Finally, the fires in the surroundings of HV overhead lines usually arise when the vegetation is in contact with the live parts of
line. A pollution flashover rarely leads to the ignition of vegetation fires, but a fire on a wood pole caused by pollution often
causes the development of a fire in the nearby vegetation and forest. The main remedy is the regular maintenance of the right
of way of HV lines, the use of one of the above described remedies to prevent burning of wood poles and - possibly - the
employment of special chemicals238 to inhibit the ignition process.
1999-09-01
86
5. POLLUTION MONITORING
5.1 Introduction
Cigr has previously reviewed the subject of insulator pollution monitoring in two separate publications; the first one in 1979
2
and the other in 1994240. These reviews are summarised briefly herein. Some additional informatio, which has been
published recently, is also included.
Insulator-pollution monitoring serves the following main purposes 239 240:
1.
1999-09-01
87
Pollution Monitoring
Insulator Performance
Measurement
Environmental
Severity Measurement
Measurements on
Insulators
Environmental
Measurement
Surge Counting
Equivalent Salt
Deposit Density
Non-Soluble
Deposit Density
Directional Dust
Deposit Gauge
Surface Conductance
Optical Measurement
Figure 5-1: Organisation of insulator pollution monitoring methods for site severity estimation, insulator characterisation
and insulator maintenance.
In the following descriptions, each of these methods will be dealt with only briefly because the detailed information is
adequately covered in the publications.
5.2.1.1 Advantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
5.2.1.2 Disadvantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
The response of the insulation to the environment is not assessed; i.e. the effects of washing and insulator wetting.
Long periods are necessary to obtain results.
The method does not distinguish between slow- and fast-dissolving salts. Critical wetting conditions are, therefore, not
determined.
The amount of rainfall during the measuring cycle influences the obtained severity. A high rainfall during the measuring
period will cause the measured pollution level to be higher than the actual level - and vice versa - because the natural
cleaning ability of insulators is not taken into account.
1999-09-01
88
5.3.1 Advantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
5.3.2 Disadvantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
It is very time consuming to find the maximum pollution level between the incidences of natural washing. The timing of
monitoring is essential.
ESDD is insensitive to volatile chemicals dissolved in rain or mist that do not leave deposits on the insulator surface.
Chemicals such as SO2 and H2S would not be detected.
To perform the ESDD measurement, a certain amount of skill is necessary
The test removes the pollution layer from the insulator surface. Several insulator strings should, therefore, be monitored
to determine the build-up of the pollution.
The method does not discriminate between slow- and fast-dissolving deposits.
Critical wetting conditions for insulators are not determined by ESDD.
There is uncertainty in the applicability of this method to polymeric insulators, due to the transfer of hydrophobic
properties to the pollution layer.
1999-09-01
89
the corresponding readings by the instrument. Other aspects of employing Peltier coolers for making such measurements have
also been reported 244 245.
5.5.1 Advantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
5.5.2 Disadvantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
The surface conductance can only be measured under wetting conditions. Application of this method may, therefore, be
impractical in low rainfall or non-fog/mist areas. If artificial wetting is introduced, usually as steam or fog, the results
will only be applicable for areas with fast dissolving salts.
Due to the complexity of the equipment, this method is fairly costly.
The method does not discriminate between slow- and fast-dissolving deposits.
Critical wetting conditions for insulators are not determined.
1999-09-01
90
circulating cooling liquid that lowers the surface temperature to promote wetting. The surface conductance of the entire
insulator is then measured to establish a pollution severity. An interesting detail, is the inclusion of a shield that is raised
during the cooling and measuring process to reduce turbulence around the insulator. This precaution is taken because such air
turbulence may influence the humidification process and so give an erratic result. The available measurements from inservice use are, unfortunately, limited and so a thorough evaluation of this method's performance is not yet possible.
Another example of a recently developed device - that is based on the measurement of surface conductivity - is the LWS,
Liquid Water Sensor247. This device can be used to determine the contamination level when the relative humidity is above
65%. It measures the amount of liquid water and the level of contamination on a surrogate insulator. According to the
authors, the LWS is a better indicator of the contamination level than the peak leakage current, which depends on the amount
of wetting. However, very little information of the working principles of the LWS has so far been given.
Explosive fuses
Figure 5-2: An example of the use of explosive fuses to monitor insulator performance.
5.6.1 Advantages
1.
2.
Actual insulators are tested under service conditions, thereby directly giving the required insulation level.
Depending on the implementation of this method, the cost involved can be reasonable.
5.6.2 Disadvantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
The results are only valid for the type of insulator string under test.
As flashover occurs on the insulator under test, it is generally not acceptable on a service transmission system.
The source impedance must be low - testing may, therefore, become expensive.
No data regarding the mechanism of flashover are obtained.
1999-09-01
91
5.7.1.1 Advantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
Actual insulators are tested under service conditions, thereby directly giving the required insulation level.
Depending on the implementation of this method, the cost involved can be reasonable.
This technique provides information on all the stages of the pollution flashover mechanism.
This method enables information to be determined if an existing line or substation needs to be upgraded.
5.7.1.2 Disadvantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
This method only provides comparative data that must be assessed against similar information collected elsewhere.
A degree of sophistication is required for the instrumentation.
No information regarding the mechanism of flashover is obtained.
The results are only valid for the type of insulator under test.
5.7.2 I highest
Ihighest is the highest peak of leakage current that is recorded during a given time period on an insulator continuously energised
at its service voltage. It has been considered as a suitable parameter to indicate how close a glass or porcelain insulator is to
flashover.
5.7.2.1 Advantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Actual insulators are tested under service conditions, thereby directly giving the required insulation level.
This technique provides information on all the stages of the pollution flashover mechanism.
The information, provided by this measurement, can be easily compared to that obtained from making laboratory tests.
It provides a continuous record of the insulator performance under various weather conditions.
This method enables information to be determined if an existing line or substation needs to be upgraded.
5.7.2.2 Disadvantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
5.8 Conclusions
A wide range of monitoring methods has been developed. It is shown that not all of the monitoring techniques are equally
applicable for all the environments. It is hoped that Cigr will give some guidance to the selection of applicable methods in
the forthcoming application guidelines that are currently under consideration. For more information, the reader is also
referred to the already mentioned reviews 2 240.
The situation concerning the relevance of existing pollution monitoring methods for the dimensioning of the highly
hydrophobic types of polymeric insulators (e.g. silicone rubber ones) warrants a major research investigation to be carried out.
1999-09-01
92
1999-09-01
93
The results of testing under natural pollution conditions may be interpreted as a relative ranking within a group of insulators.
Also, a comparison with the corresponding results for a well-known reference insulator is possible.
Tests conducted under natural pollution conditions usually require long test periods due to both the natural dynamics of the
deposition of the contaminants and the necessity to collect sufficient data for providing a statistically reliable set of results.
TESTING STATION
Martigues
225/3
20/3 (fixed)
Brighton
34,5/3 (fixed)
132/3 (fixed)
275/3 (fixed)
550/3 - 825/3
(variable)
1999-09-01
94
6.3 Test procedures for porcelain and glass insulators to be used in high-voltage a.c.
or d.c. systems
The procedures described in the following subsections have been established for ceramic insulators and are not directly
applicable to polymeric insulators, to greased insulators or to special types of insulator (i.e. insulators with conductive glaze
or covered with a polymeric insulating material).
For bushings or other apparatus incorporating hollow insulators with internal equipment, special precautions may be necessary
to avoid over-stressing of the internal insulation since the test voltage may be greater than the nominal design one.
1999-09-01
95
The wetting process in this test procedure runs under two different conditions: wetting of the dry layer up to the maximum
layer conductivity (severity value for the individual test) in 20 to 40 minutes without applying the test voltage, and continuing
the wetting after immediate application of the constant test voltage for 15 minutes at maximum.
A detailed description of the Solid-Layer test Procedure A is given in IEC 507,1991 22.
Note: This procedure is only rarely used today and is not considered to be optimal. For most of the cases, Procedure B
"Wetting after energisation" (see clause 6.3.1.2.2) is to be preferred.
258
Starting with a stabilisation period of 20 minutes at about 90 % of the estimated flashover voltage at the specified salinity, the
test voltage is then raised in 5 % steps, 1 minute at each level, until flashover. The insulator is immediately re-energised at its
initial voltage and the process repeated until 5 flashovers are obtained. This part of the procedure is a kind of conditioning of
the insulator.
For the second part, 90 % of the average of the 5 FOV values is applied to the insulator as a reference voltage. The test
voltage is then raised in steps of 2,5 % - 3,5 % every 5 minutes until flashover. The test is continued with 90 % of the
previous value of the flashover voltage until the required number of flashovers has been obtained. The performance criterion
for the insulator is the mean FOV after the stability of the FOV values has been reached. Lambeth258 has suggested that, for
porcelain insulators, there is an acceptable relation between the withstand salinity determined according to IEC 507 and the
mean FOV obtained from the quick flashover method.
1999-09-01
96
Voltage
Dust
Fog
Rain
Wet
Drying
Time
Figure 6-1: Schematic view of one cycle of the Dust chamber method260.
The performance criterion of the insulator is the SDD-value of the artificial pollution layer, the test voltage and the number of
cycles required to achieve flashover. To avoid too many cycles, a fixed number can be run to simulate a specific
environment. The duration of pollution application and the amount of wetting have been calibrated using a standard type of
insulator so that the pollution level after the fixed number of cycles corresponds to the specified degree of pollution. If no
flashover occurs during these cycles, the test object is deemed to have withstood the specified degree of pollution for which it
has been tested. A more detailed ranking using the leakage current and the SDD and NSDD-values is possible. Additional
research is needed to establish the relation between these results and those determined from tests made according to IEC 507.
1999-09-01
97
The withstand salinities obtained from the heavy wetting tests are not equivalent to the withstand values from tests made
according to IEC 507. This is due to the decrease of salt-fog deposits during both the drain period and the test period and the
large difference in the quantity of water impinging on the insulator.
6.4 Test procedures for polymeric insulators to be used in high-voltage a.c. or d.c.
systems
Operational and laboratory experiences show that the pollution performance of new polymeric insulators is superior to that of
glass or porcelain insulators. This excellent pollution performance may deteriorate during service time due to the influence of
UV radiation, temperature, humidity and leakage current discharges. Different accelerated ageing test procedures have been
developed 268, but as yet no agreed method is available for predicting the pollution performance of a polymeric insulator under
given site conditions with time in service. The Cigr Task Force 33.04.07, Testing of polymeric insulators, is dealing with
this problem. IEC TC 36 also deals with this in its work-programme.
1999-09-01
98
Mounting arrangement
Ice accretion
Voltage application
Withstand voltage evaluation
1999-09-01
99
The cold fog test without icicles does not determine the minimum flashover level of an insulator. However, it does reproduce
field conditions that are observed frequently and the test is severe enough to give realistic performance rankings.
2.
A snow-pile jig may be used to cover the test-insulator assembly with snow 190. If the test is conducted inside a
laboratory, the jig and insulator assembly should first be cooled sufficiently by dry ice. The snow can then be piled into
the jig and so onto the insulator. After the whole insulator assembly is covered with snow, the snow-pile jig is removed.
Blocks are cut from naturally accumulated snow on the ground. These blocks are then arranged on top of the insulator
assembly under test. The conductivity of the snow may be adjusted by uniformly spraying a salt solution over the snow.
Just before the test the volume density, liquid water content, conductivity, and volume resistivity of the snow on the
insulator are measured 189.
1999-09-01
100
From a standardisation point of view, the testing methods must meet the requirement of reproducibility 3. Therefore, it has
been necessary to investigate the effect of the ambient conditions during testing on the flashover/withstand voltage of
contaminated insulators subjected to a.c. and d.c. voltages. Taskforce 07 of Cigr Working Group 33-04 is dealing with the
aspects of testing polymeric insulators. The findings of that taskforce will soon be published.
The aim of this section is to review the current knowledge published in the technical literature on the effect of ambient
conditions during testing and reproducibility in artificial tests.
282
In the standard contamination tests, the influence of temperature has so far been disregarded.
1999-09-01
101
The fog density of 3 to 7g/m3, under which withstand voltages with a small scatter of values was obtained, was several
orders of a magnitude higher than the density of natural fog. This is because the artificial fog is used to wet the
contaminated insulator in a reasonably short period of time.
1999-09-01
102
b) The droplet size distribution, which influences the wetting process by collision under the artificial fog, was almost the
same as that of natural fog.
c) By using steam or hot water, the temperature-difference between the insulator and the fog-chamber was 6 to 7C. This
value was higher than that of natural fog. Therefore, the artificial wetting process is accelerated from the viewpoint of the
condensation.
NGK has reported 44 measurements of fog-density in the range of 2 to 5 g/m3 for steam injection and 0.5 to 1.8 g/m3 for
evaporation-fog. Similar measurements with evaporation-fog at HVTRC gave 0.3 to 1.5 g/m3. In their conclusions they have
reported that, for fog densities higher than 0.3 - 0.4 g/m3, both the evaporation-fog and the fog produced by steam injection
gave the same level of flashover voltage. The wetting rates were also quite similar. The authors have suggested the need to
investigate the performance of insulators under very light fog condition, characterised by fog densities of less than a 0.3 g/m3.
This is because the uneven wetting along the string may cause a non-uniform voltage distribution - which, in turn, may affect
the flashover voltage.
2.
3.
The test results of the Clean-Fog procedure seem to be reproducible because the scatter among different participants is
about that obtained in artificial contamination tests on HVAC insulators, for which the test-procedure has already been
standardised.
The reproducibility of the results obtained by the Salt-Fog procedure is not very satisfactory. Further investigation seems
necessary, in terms of reproducibility and repeatability, to standardise the procedure of artificial contamination testing on
HVDC insulators.
It seems that sufficient information is available to allow the preparation of provisional international specifications for
artificial contamination testing of HVDC insulators.
1999-09-01
103
Such an insulator has a characteristic like that of an insulator with a shorter creepage distance, provided the applied stress on
the latter does not lead to bridging over between the sheds.
2
A
Leakage current
1,5
0,5
0
2,5
10
20 kg/m 40
Salinity
Highest leakage current from 1 hour withstand test;
Current in the halfcycle before flashover;
Figure 6-3: Leakage current characteristic of the longrod insulator L 75/22/150 (test voltage 72 kV rms, creepage distance
2480 mm).
6.6.4 Comparison of test results obtained with different pollution test methods
Each of the two test methods, the Salt-Fog method and the Solid-Layer method, simulates different pollution conditions that
lead to a pollution flashover. This difference may lead to different rankings for several insulators, using these two test
methods. For different insulators, there is no direct relationship between the severity parameters of the test methods. For one
insulator type and the same electrical stress, a correlation between the test methods is possible - using either the flashover
voltage or the leakage-current characteristic.
1999-09-01
104
Figure 6-4: Results of a.c. natural contamination tests compared with Clean-Fog tests294.
A similar tendency as reported above for a.c. energisation has been obtained for a comparison of d.c. results - as is shown in
Figure 6-5.
Figure 6-5: Results of d.c. natural contamination tests compared with Clean-Fog tests 252.
1999-09-01
105
Type of
pollution
Active type
Conductive
Dissolving
Inert (effect of )
Prediction of
critical wetting
conditions
Mechanism of
pollution deposit
Precipitation
Wind borne
Electrical
Amount
Density
Particle size
Insulator
application
Estimation of
pollution distribution
on the insulator
Test and
service
experience
Identify optimal
profile & material
for insulator
Creepage
Estimation
Insulator selection
and length
1999-09-01
106
1999-09-01
107
In the case of d.c. energisation, the accumulation of pollution is generally higher than that on an insulator for a.c. in the same
environment. Consequently, the required creepage distance to withstand pollution for d.c. must be suitably increased over that
recommended for a.c. to obtain the equivalent performance. For d.c. substation insulators, such as wall bushings, insulator
selection must take into account the behaviour of these insulators in relatively clean areas with non-uniform wetting. Section
3.4.2 discusses this topic in more detail.
Probability
Insulation (W)
Environment (S)
Margin
Site severity
Figure 7-2: An example of the deterministic method.
In Figure 7-2, the deterministic approach is illustrated by using an example for obtaining the design withstand pollution
severity of an insulator with respect to the maximum pollution severity of the environment in which the insulator must operate.
In this example, the operating voltage of the insulator, Vs, is known. The maximum withstand pollution severity (ESDD) that
the insulator must withstand is then calculated by assuming complete wetting of the pollution layer. The design withstand
pollution severity, or the corresponding withstand voltage, Vw, is determined with an acceptable margin; e.g. 10%, between
Vw and Vs.
The following problems exist with this approach:
1.
2.
3.
The pollution severity, insulator withstand voltage and the degree of wetting are all probabilistic values.
The selected margin depends on the judgement of the design engineer and has, therefore, no statistical significance.
Only a single insulator string, or stack, is considered in this approach; but, in the actual design, many such insulators are
connected in parallel.
1999-09-01
108
If the insulation strength is increased, the P curve moves to the right of the f curve and the risk-of-failure decreases as
shown in Figure 7-3b; but such a change can be costly. The optimum design is, therefore, obtained by optimising the cost
against the risk-of-failure.
(a)
(b)
Figure 7-3: An example of the probabilistic method; the effect of increasing insulation strength.
The probabilistic approached is considered in a similar fashion for the mechanical design of an overhead line support in IEC
Publication 826297, where the strength of the support and the load applied to it are considered as variables.
STATIC METHOD
Obtain risk of failure, R, by integrating the product
of F(w), distribution function of ESDD, and P(w),
Flashover probability.
Advantage
Disadvantage
Possible
improvement
1999-09-01
109
DYNAMIC METHOD
Obtain risk of failure R(w) in a certain
period, by summing up the product of w(ti),
ESDD at a time and P(w), flashover
probability.
Possible to obtain risk-of-failure at any time
and, thus, may be utilised as 'an alarm' of
pollution for a system.
100
80
no
pollution
60
very light
pollution
light pollution
40
20
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
100
80
60
40
20
12
16
20
1999-09-01
110
assumed by considering the tolerable number of events per year. For this risk of failure value, the required flashover value at
the equivalent severity of the pollution on the insulator is determined. A suitable insulator is selected from the standpoint of
leakage path length. The standardisation of insulators for polluted areas is also discussed.
CAIRO MONTENOTTE
Surface conductivity
( Aug: 77 - Oct: 81 )
No of critical events: 125
99.8
99.5
99.0
95.0
90.0
PORTO EMPEDOCLE
Salinity - ( Jan: 79 - Oct: 81 )
No of critical events: 105
70.0
50.0
30.0
PORTO MARGHERA
ESDD -( Aug: 77 - Oct: 81 )
No of critical events: 102
10.0
1.0
1
Insulator Y
8 10
20
40 60 80 100
200
Surface conductivity (S)
Figure 7-6: Examples of cumulative frequency distributions of the maximum values of pollution severity recorded in the
various events at three typical sites (values are expressed in terms of the equivalent severity relevant to the laboratory
method deemed more valid for each site) 303.
Figure 7-7 shows an example design-standard for 132 - to 150 kV lines.
320
160
132 kV lines
150 kV lines
80
40
20
10
5
2.5
9 (10)(11)(12) 9 10 11 12
Standard units Antifog units
Figure 7-7: ENEL standardisation; dimensioning of insulator strings for 132 kV and 150 kV lines 303.
Naito et al 299 have extended the approach into three dimensions. They calculated the static risk-of-failure on 800 kV
transmission lines by treating the flashover voltage, pollution severity and degree of wetting as probabilistic values. A
regression curve for relative humidity (RH) was proposed, as shown in Figure 7-8, which is based on hourly observations.
The corresponding probability of simultaneous occurrence of ESDD and RH is shown in Figure 7-9.
1999-09-01
111
99.9
100 points
99.
1.
0.1
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
RH [%]
Figure 7-8: Cumulative probability of Relative Humidity 299.
The flashover probability, as a function of RH and ESDD, is shown in Figure 7-10, for 200 parallel insulator strings.
1
1.5
1.
0.1
0
0
20
40
RH [%
]
60
80
0.01
g/c
m
[
0.05
DD
100
ES
2]
1999-09-01
112
100
80
60
40
20
1.5
1.
0.1
0
20
40
60
RH [%
]
80
0.01
0.05 SDD
E
100
2]
m
g/c
[m
Figure 7-10: Flashover probability, Pn, as a function of RH and ESDD (N=200) 299.
80
60
40
20
1.5
1.
0.1
0
0
20
40 60
RH [%
]
80
0.01
[m
0.05
D
D
100
ES
2]
m
g/c
1999-09-01
113
15
10
5
0
3
Rainfall (mm/10min)
2
1
0
100
ESDD (mg/cm2)
50
0
100
RH (%)
50
0
100
50
0
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
60
Actual flashover
40
20
0
0
12
18
12
18
Time of day
Figure 7-12: A sample simulation of flashover probability311.
1999-09-01
114
100
EHV
UHV
160
E Eo
N = k
Eo
150
90
Eo = 99
.
k = 161
n = 2.1
140
130
80
70
120
110
60
100
90
170
50
0.01
0.1
1.0
10
7.2.9 Conclusions
Many probabilistic approaches have been reported for designing insulators under polluted conditions.
From a methodological point of view, a considerable amount of work is still necessary before this type of approach can be
internationally accepted. In addition, for such an approach to be successful, reliable statistical data of both the pollution
severity and the insulation strength are required. The statistical approach is, therefore, not yet sufficiently advanced to be
applied in the design or maintenance of insulators in a polluted environment. However, such a method can give a clear
indication of the critical conditions that will lead to insulator flashover.
1999-09-01
115
A correct insulator profile is required to enhance the withstand characteristics and to reduce pollution build-up.
High resistance / high purity dielectrics are necessary to reduce the risk of ion migration / accumulation.
Sacrificial electrodes on metal fittings are necessary to avoid the effects of unidirectional current flow, especially in
humid environments.
Points 2 and 3 are covered in detail in IEC 61245 that gives minimum values and test methods to check these parameters.
Point 1 is more difficult to specify.
For glass and ceramic cap and pin designs and post and bushing insulators, the optimal profiles are well known315. However
for polymeric insulators, the lack of service experience - especially for d.c. - means that the profiles which are currently used
are based on laboratory artificial pollution tests only and do not take into account pollution deposition mechanisms found in
service. Hopefully the growing use of polymeric insulators for d.c. applications can remedy this lack of knowledge and
experience.
1999-09-01
116
Table 7-3: Correction factor, Kp, that provides the ratio between pollution levels at d.c. and a.c. voltage 325.
KP
1 - 1.2
1.3 - 1.9
2-3
SITE CONDITIONS
areas influenced only by natural pollution sources, such as sea and desert
areas influenced both by natural pollution sources and by industrial pollution sources
but at a few kilometres distance from the industrial pollution sources
areas close to (within a few kilometres) industrial pollution sources and are
considered as clean from the viewpoint of a.c. voltage
A further parameter that may intensify the accumulation of contamination at d.c. voltage is the electrical charging of the
contaminants by industrial processes or by corona discharges from high-voltage equipment.
1999-09-01
117
Use of brushes.
1999-09-01
118
1999-09-01
119
The water stream should withstand the electrical stress under the a.c. system voltage and the corresponding overvoltages;
as per the general requirements for live-line maintenance 329 330 331.
The requirements to satisfy these two conditions are analysed in the following section, by making reference to the most critical
condition of the water stream impinging on the energised part.
The second requirement discussed also applies to the Fixed-Spray Nozzles method.
In the case of Helicopter-Mounted Nozzles and of the Remote-Controlled Jet Nozzles methods, no harm to the personnel must
occur following capacitive charging of, or arcing along, the water stream. The other aspects that should be considered in this
case are related to the dielectric strength of the overall configuration with the helicopter, or tool, at floating potential. Also,
when they are possibly at line potential, discharges from the line-electrodes to the object at floating potential may occur.
These aspects are similar to those analysed in the literature 329 330 331 and so will not be considered further herein.
Figure 8-1: Leakage current I on the water stream in relation to the voltage and the length of the water stream 330.
1999-09-01
120
Figure 8-2: Leakage current I on the water stream in relation to various parameters 330.
a) Influence of water resistivity.
b) Influence of water pressure.
c) Iinfluence of nozzle orifice diameter.
1999-09-01
121
Figure 8-3: 50% flashover voltage under a.c. energisation as a function of the stream-length for different water-stream
parameters 328 330 213.
As far as impulse voltages are concerned, the dependence of the 50% flashover voltage on the polarity and shape of the
impulse is given in Figure 8-4 330. It shows the flashover voltage in relation to the time-to-crest of the applied voltage for a
water-stream length of 4m. In these tests, negative polarity was the more critical. For switching impulse (SI) waveforms, a
1999-09-01
122
front time of about 1200 s gave the lowest level of flashover voltage. This value was about 25% smaller than the
corresponding one obtained with a standard SI of positive polarity - which is usually considered the more onerous in other
experiments 336 213.
Figure 8-4: 50% flashover voltage along the water stream under impulse voltages in relation to the time-to-crest of the
applied impulse 330.
The 50% flashover voltage under switching impulse and standard lightning impulse wave (LI) is compared to the a.c.
energised one in Figure 8-5 330. In this example, all of the stresses are given in peak value to facilitate the comparison. From
comparing the results with the corresponding ones for pure air gaps331, it appears that the reduction in the flashover voltage
due to the water jet is marked with a.c. and SI, while it is minor with LI. Furthermore, the flashover value under SI is close to
that of the peak value under a.c. voltage.
Figure 8-5: 50% flashover voltage along the water stream: comparison of the dielectric strength under different stresses330.
1999-09-01
123
Figure 8-6: Average flashover gradient along the water stream in relation to various parameters 328 330 213.
a) Influence of water resistivity.
b) Influence of water pressure.
c) Influence of nozzle orifice diameter.
1999-09-01
124
The flashover voltage of the water jet is almost a linear function of the stream length.
The dependence of the average flashover gradient along the water stream on water resistivity, water pressure and nozzle
orifice diameter is shown in Figure 8-6 a), b) and c) respectively 328 330 213.
The flashover gradient increases when the water resistivity is increased. It decreases when the diameter of the nozzle is
increased and has a U-curve relationship to pressure; thereby indicating a critical pressure that causes a minimum in the
flashover strength - which depends on nozzle characteristics.
1999-09-01
125
328
Figure 8-9: Flashover voltage along the insulator string in relation to water pressure for various nozzle diameters 330.
As far as SI flashover voltage is concerned, rather low withstand values are obtained during washing - as is shown in Figure 89 330. This information refers to standard switching impulses of negative polarity, giving - in this case - results close to the
1999-09-01
126
critical one (i.e. the minimum on the U-curve). However, the performance under SI is not very critical from the risk
viewpoint; because of the low probability of having a high overvoltage during a washing operation. Thus, the corresponding
risk of flashover can essentially be neglected. The dielectric performance during washing is also influenced by water pressure
and nozzle-orifice diameter, as may be seen from Figure 8-9. In general, the flashover voltage increases when the pressure is
increased and the orifice diameter is decreased.
Finally, it is worthy of note that the flashover voltages measured in tests simulating washing from a helicopter, were slightly
higher than those obtained by using the portable hand-held jet nozzle - for these parameters considered by Perin et al 330. This
finding can be easily explained if one considers that the orifice diameter, and thus the quantity of water employed, was much
lower in the former case.
Figure 8-10: Residual salt deposit density in relation to the washing time;
portable hand-held jet nozzle and helicopter nozzle 330.
These tests were carried out on a vertical insulator string for a 420 kV system, with a total length of 3 m. The following
washing parameters applied:
Portable hand-held jet nozzle; orifice diameter of 6.4 mm, pressure of 3000 kPa and a minimum distance to the
conductor of 5 m.
Helicopter simulation; nozzle with an orifice diameter of 1.7 mm, pressures of 4000 to 8000 kPa and minimum distance
to the conductor of 1 m.
The tests were made by contaminating the insulator string with an almost standard suspension and a non-standard one.
The almost standard suspension differed from the standard one by the quantity of kaolin used (100 g per litre). In the nonstandard suspension, glue was added (10 g of metylan per litre) to increase the adhesion and the thickness of the layer, with
the aim of simulating conditions typical of industrial areas.
The test results provided in Figure 8-10 show that the washing efficiency improves when the washing time is increased.
Furthermore, the value of the effective washing time depends on the type of contamination. The time needed for an efficient
1999-09-01
127
wash using portable hand-held jet nozzles was shorter than that with helicopter-mounted jet nozzles, for a similar water
pressure. Better agreement could be obtained by increasing the water pressure in the helicopter case.
8.2.1.7 Conclusions
8.2.1.7.1 Safety aspects
The safe working distances for live-line insulator washing made by an operator at earth potential, with a portable handheld jet nozzle, must be determined with reference to a limiting value of the leakage current along the water jet. It should
also be verified from the point of view of the withstand voltage under SI, as is the situation for any other live-line
working operation. To this end, the most critical SI is that of negative polarity with a long front time.
The same requirements may be used conservatively when fixed spray nozzles at ground potential are used.
Safe working from a helicopter, implying the use of isolated metallic tools, must be determined by considering the
dielectric strength of the arrangement with the object at floating potential (or possibly momentarily at live potential, if a
discharge from the live electrode to the object at floating potential occurs). For this aspect, reference to the general
requirements for live-line maintenance can be usefully made.
When automated procedures are used, without the presence of people in the vicinity, electrical safety requirements are of
concern only to the equipment.
2.
Wash withstand voltage. An effective insulation length shorter than that for ceramic insulators is sometimes used because
of the higher pollution withstand voltage. Since the withstand voltage under washing is mainly affected by water
cascading down the sheds, hydrophobicity is then not the dominant factor. Therefore, the effective insulation length is
the same as that of the corresponding ceramic one. In the case of insulators having a large diameter, such as bushing
shells, the amount of cascading water is larger than that of line insulators. In such a case, the fitting of some special sheds
- such as booster sheds - is recommended to break up the cascading stream of water.
Mechanical damage to material. It is reported that the shed material can suffer damage, such as tearing, or puncture in
the case of high water pressure 343 344. Therefore, the water pressure must be carefully specified; mainly taking the
following aspects into consideration,
Shed material (e.g. silicone rubber, EPDM etc).
1999-09-01
128
best cleaning. This is especially so when the pollution layer adheres strongly to the insulator surface; e.g. cement or gypsum,
and when the water stream can not reach the entire insulator surface 345.
HYDROCARBON
(PETROLEUM JELLY)
SILICONE
Basic constituents
Useful temperature
0 to 60C
-50 to 200C
Melting point
60 to 90C
90 to 115C
Slow
Rapid
Ease of Application
Good
Ease of Removal
Labour intensive
Labour intensive
Not available
Material cost
Low
Moderate
Application cost
Moderate
Moderate
Cleaning cost
High
High
Water erosion, excessive exposure to corona, UV light and significant contaminant encapsulation reduce water repellency.
Once hydrophobicity is lost, leakage currents will commence flowing and, in time, dry band discharges will also commence.
These discharges cause the grease to decompose and the filler in the grease adds to the contaminant. Channels begin to
develop resulting in local hot spots and further degradation of the grease and possible damage to the insulator. Once channels
have begun to form, flashover of the insulator is imminent 347. Regreasing should be implemented as soon as dry band arcing
is observed.
1999-09-01
129
The frequency of regreasing depends on the type of grease and the severity of the degrading influences mentioned above.
Service experience with both a.c. and d.c. systems, has shown that the useful life of a grease coating can vary from less than
one year to 10 years.
Greases are normally applied by hand, brush or spray. Although application on de-energised systems is simpler, application
on live systems is also possible. The application of fresh grease over contaminated grease is not recommended.
There are several tests that can be made to assess the suitability of grease as an insulator coating. The most significant are an
arc endurance test under wetting and the water repellency tests in a Salt-Fog chamber or using a tracking wheel.
Unfortunately, the laboratory tests suffer from a lack of correlation with field experience. Field-testing has proved to be the
only reliable method for evaluating the performance of different greases 347.
The pollution flashover performance of a 132kV epoxy-resin crossarm, which has been used in the UK to achieve an
inconspicuous overhead line in areas of outstanding natural beauty, has been assessed using both the artificial salt-fog test and
by exposure to natural marine pollution at the Brighton Insulator Testing Station249. The findings from the salt-fog test are
shown in Table 10-39. Although there was a large reduction - up to 50% of the new value - in the flashover voltage of the
service-aged insulator, the performance of such insulators was substantially restored by the application of a hydrophobic
coating; e.g. silicone oil, restored the withstand voltage to 70% of the original value. An even larger improvement was
obtained by using hydrocarbon grease but, because it tends to promote tracking on the insulator surface, it is not
recommended for practical use. The follow-up tests at Brighton showed the benefit of using a silicone oil of as high a
viscosity as possible. In a practical application, a flashover problem was alleviated to a large extent by coating the surface
with a viscous silicone oil - applied yearly by linesmen with paintbrushes. In this case, the severity of the marine pollution estimated ESDD of 0.6 mg/cm2 - is even greater than that at Brighton and where flashovers had occurred on such insulators
having a specific creepage of 25 mm/kV system.
8.3.4 Summary
As a summary, a comparison of silicone greases and RTV coatings is given in Table 8-2.
1999-09-01
130
RTV COATINGS
excellent in lifetime
Low
High
Low demands
High demands
Handling character
Monitoring
needed
no
removal
disposal
Reapplication
1999-09-01
131
Table 8-3: Improvement in performance of a 400 kV substation insulator from fitting booster sheds 355.
Test Procedure
Insulator
Angle of tilt,
Degrees
20 second wash
0
0
0
10
10
0
0
0
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
10
10
2 second wash
Side spray
Impulse wash
Rain
No. of
Booster
sheds
7
10
10
10
10
7
10
10
10
10
7
10
7
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Performance,
WPS, kg/m3
Factor of improvement
over bare insulator.
113
40
56
80
40
40
28
40
28
40
240
160
40
40
40
56
240
240
160
40
2.8
2.8
4
4
2.8
2
4
5.6
5.6
8
16
16
4
5.6
5.6
4
2
4
128
8
Investigations for their use under d.c. voltage have shown that by installing booster sheds on a HVDC wall bushing, its
dielectric strength under uneven rain or polluted conditions can be improved by up to 80 % 202. Laboratory tests have also
been performed on vertically installed d.c. station post insulators with booster sheds 110. By fitting 20 booster sheds on a
stacked station post insulator of 8.8 m overall length, the dielectric strength of this post insulator was increased by 30 % at a
pollution level of 0,02 mg/cm2, as compared to that of the insulator without such booster sheds.
8.5 Methods for increasing insulator reliability under ice and snow conditions
For reliable operation of insulation under ice or snow conditions, it is generally necessary to use insulators with a long dry
arc-distance. As ice and snow flashovers are relatively infrequent, it is reasonable to restrict the use of special insulator
designs to only selected parts of overhead lines. For example, fit them only on that part of a line that experiences regular
icing or that runs close to cooling towers etc. On other parts of the line, more economical measures to improve their
operational reliability should be considered.
1999-09-01
132
Special insulator shapes or different types of disc insulators in the same string.
For post insulators, it is possible to use designs with alternate long and short sheds. The difference between the shed
diameters must be sufficient to prevent icicle bridging.
The same effect can be achieved on suspension insulator strings by building up the string with insulators of different
diameters; e.g. an arrangement of alternate normal and aerodynamic discs.
The use of vertical polymeric insulators may prove to be ineffective if the sheds are spaced closer together than is the
case for the discs of the equivalent ceramic insulator string. In this situation, the ice-flashover voltage may actually be
lower than that for a ceramic string of the same length. An improvement may be achieved by using the polymer insulator
in V or horizontal configuration or by having an alternate long and short shed-profile with sufficient inter-shed spacing
111
.
Semiconducting glaze insulators.
Semiconducting glazed porcelain insulators usually provide a resistive current of approximately 1 mA. This steady
current improves the voltage grading and warms the insulator surface slightly. Semiconducting glazed post insulators
have shown the highest withstand voltage under icing conditions among the various insulators tested - including
conventional ceramic and polymeric insulators 180. However, there is no common agreement on the effectiveness of this
method.
Shielding insulators from water melted from ice.
2)
By having shields places between the tower and insulator strings, the water released from the ice during melting will be
drained away from the insulators.
Increasing the dry arc-distance of insulators:
Please refer to Section 7.3
3)
4)
5)
2)
3)
4)
1999-09-01
133
1999-09-01
134
The external charge/h rose to 11 C/h for a 2-h period and 9 C/h for 6-h period, both were for the 2-unit 420 kV arrester.
The temperature rise in the bottom unit correlates rather well with the internal charge flow, per 5-min period, through
that unit.
To a first approximation, the external charge was found to be proportional to the arrester diameter.
The external charge, scaled to the housing diameter, appears to be representative of the discharge activity on the arrester.
The magnitude of the internal current cannot be linked to a block-temperature rise.
Similar field tests were reported from a 300 kV switchyard at Lista, Norway. No temperature rise measurement was
undertaken, since the arresters were connected to the network. It was stated that no correlation was found between internal
and external charge activity. To avoid confusion, however, it must be underlined that this statement applies only to charges of
just one arrester unit.
1999-09-01
135
Only a moderate temperature rise was recorded for the Salt-Fog test (< 30C) and the slurry test (< 35C) 360. The partial
wetting test was found to be the most severe, yielding a temperature rise of up to 79C. This paper served as a basis for the
standardisation of the partial-wetting method referred to in C62.11-1987 373
The results of a Salt-Fog test on the arresters described in Section 9.2 were reported by Vitet et al. 366, for salinities in the
range 1.2-80 kg/m3. Typical temperature rise curves - as a function of the test duration for different salinities - are shown in
Figure 9-1 366. The variation of the varistor temperature of the bottom unit as well as that of the internal current and of the
energy are shown in Figure 9-2 as functions of the salt-fog duration. Figure 9-3 shows the flow of external charge as a
function of the test duration 366.
Figure 9-1: Typical temperature during a Salt-Fog tests of 1.2 to 80 g/l salinity 366.
Figure 9-2: Bottom unit temperature, internal energy and internal current peaks in a Salt-Fog test 366.
From the aforementioned test, the following observations can be made 366:
No correlation was found between the maximum varistor-temperature and fog salinity.
A somewhat contradictory finding is that the external charge per hour correlates well with fog salinity and, moreover,
increases almost linearly with the test-duration.
Current peaks cannot be used to determine the thermal stress on the arrester blocks.
1999-09-01
136
Breaks in the duration of the fog spray have no effect because discharge activity ceases during such breaks.
Solid-Layer tests conducted by Vitet et al. 366 - with ESDD in the range 0.20.7 mg/cm2 - yielded a negligible temperature rise
in the bottom unit and a maximum temperature rise in the top unit of 26C; which are much less than the corresponding values
with the Salt-Fog test. Good correlation was reported between the external charge on the bottom-unit and the temperature rise
of the top-unit varistor.
Figure 9-4: Temperature and charge flow during a slurry test with six test cycles 366.
1999-09-01
137
A comparison was made 366 between the flow of external charge and the test-time for the above four test techniques. The
slurry test, after six cycles, resulted in an external charge that was slightly larger than the corresponding charge of a 2-h SaltFog test. The charge associated with the Solid-Layer test, or that of a 2-cycle partial-wetting test, was significantly lower than
that of the slurry test.
Work by ENEL-CESI on pollution testing of metal oxide surge arresters has been reported in an initial paper361 and in more
detail in two subsequent publications 370 371.
It was concluded 361 that, from the point of view of thermal effects, the Salt-Fog test was more severe than the standard SolidLayer test. The standard Salt-Fog withstand test did not yield a significant varistor-temperature rise. On the other hand, a
significant temperature rise was obtained after repeated cycles of a salt-fog at salinities much below the withstand level. With
a block temperature up to 130C, a significant change in the arrester parameter (degradation) can result, particularly
manifested by increased resistive current and additional power loss.
Figure 9-5: Temperature and external charge flow during a partial wetting test366.
It was also found that, contrary to the finding
thermal stresses in the arrester blocks 361.
366
Temporary overvoltages led to a significant temperature rise (116C instead of 38C in one case).
Finally, it was reported that a better correlation exists between temperature rise and internal current than that with external
current.
Garasim et al 371 have conducted pollution tests on 2-unit arresters that included measurement of internal and external currents
in both top and bottom units. This permits a more directly relevant correlation to be made between the test parameters and the
thermal stresses. The tests included the following techniques, as designated in the paper:
a) Partial-wetting test, with 2-cycle application according to ANSI/IEEE C62.11 1987 373.
b) Slurry test, with 6-cycle application.
c) Solid-Layer test according to IEC Publication 507, but with only one arrester unit contaminated with ESDD-0.015
mg/cm2.
d) Solid-Layer test as above, but applied to the complete arrester.
e) Salt-Fog test according to IEC 507, but with a 2-h duration and salinities in the range 2.5-40.9 kg/m3.
This paper leads to the following conclusions:
The test severity is determined by non-uniformity of the pollution rather than by the contamination level.
Pollution methods with forced non-uniformity have better repeatability. This is particularly so for technique (a) partial
wetting.
Block heating is closely related (almost proportionally) to inner charge flow but only loosely correlated to external
charge, except - of course - when the two are identical.
1999-09-01
138
Inner charge in the partial-wetting technique is a function of insulator geometry and wetting conditions (quantity of water
to be evaporated).
The proportionality constant between temperature rise and inner charge is generally in the range 7-10C/Coulomb.
From pollution tests conducted on surge arresters in the UK, reported by Sparrow 364, it was found that:
The rate of wetting has an important effect on the rate of external charge flow.
An increase of the applied voltage (thereby decreasing the specific leakage path) led to a significant decrease in the rate
of external charge flow.
Salinity had little effect on the charge flow per hour.
ESDD measurement does not appear to be a good basis for site severity as far as arrester heating is concerned.
The aim of an artificial pollution test should be to obtain a value of external charge per hour that is in accordance with
that at natural sites.
Some of the above points are confirmations of previous findings 362.
Verma et al. 369 reported on field experience in Germany and Salt-Fog tests on metal oxide arresters at FGH. The major
concern appears to be internal partial discharges caused by external pollution - with their associated varistor degradation and,
even, failure as referred to above. To alleviate that concern, German utilities require a 2000-h Salt-Fog test at phase-toground voltage with a salinity of 1 kg/m3.
Salt-Fog tests were also reported in Vermas work 369. It was concluded that, if the ratio of the test voltage Ut (phase-toground) to the arrester reference voltage Ur is less than 0.54, pollution will have no significant thermal effect on the varistors.
It is noted, however, that such a low ratio may not be practical, owing to the protective-level requirements. This work also
confirmed that a high temperature rise can be obtained at salinities much below the withstand level. It also showed that higher
temperatures are generally encountered with multi-unit rather than with single-unit arresters and that higher temperatures
occur on the top rather than on the bottom unit.
Feser et al. 365 found that for both single- and multi-unit arresters, an artificial single dry band - representing approximately
10% of the leakage path, particularly in the vicinity of the flange - can lead to a significant temperature rise of the varistor
blocks. A solid-layer contaminant was applied during those tests and wetting took place in air with a relative humidity > 85%.
In single units, the temperature rise was attributed to capacitive coupling between the varistor column and the housing and
temperatures as high as 85C were recorded. In a 2-unit arrester, temperatures as high as 105C were measured.
In a report on Solid-Layer tests (18-26 S) 368 of 110 kV and 220 kV ZnO arresters, a temperature rise of up to 46C occurred.
It was found that this temperature rise did not depend on the leakage path or the form factor of the arrester housing but, rather,
on the specific capacitance along the resistor stack. The temperature rise proved to be a statistical variable, which can be
represented by an exponential distribution. For clean and dry conditions, the calculations of overheating of the arrester
elements, as a function of input power, were provided.
It should establish an external charge activity of sufficient intensity and duration - e.g. up to 6 C/h on a small-diameter
housing using a current threshold of 2 mA peak.
2. An appreciable temperature rise should appear in any unit of a multi-unit arrester.
3. External charge accumulation should be essentially independent of the specific leakage path.
These investigations 372 concluded that only the Salt-Fog and the slurry methods fulfil the above requirements.
1999-09-01
139
Concerning the first requirement, the effect of selecting a value of threshold current based on the charge flow per hour should
be clarified. It would be even better to eliminate that quantity altogether. Instead, the real charge rate should be determined
by excluding the capacitive component from the total current.
As for the second point, only the slurry method fulfils that requirement; because in the Salt-Fog test, the top unit is the hottest
in most cases 362 367. The third point is not always satisfied by the Salt-Fog test since, as reported by Sparrow 362, the charge
flow-rate increases with the increase of the specific leakage path - particularly at 10 kg/m3 salinity.
Furthermore, Lenk 360 found that - from the thermal point of view - the partial-wetting method was the most severe. However,
this condition is, admittedly, infrequent. In practice, some examples are malfunction of the transformer deluge system (fire
protection) and stratified fog. Bargigia et al. 371 have found that this method provides the best repeatability of all the test
techniques investigated.
A comparison between the major laboratory techniques is shown in Table 9-1. Also included are the controlling parameters to
achieve the required charge rate, the thermal effect of the test, the representativity (i.e. simulation of field conditions), the
repeatability and existing standardisation experience for each method. It should be noted that while the salt-fog technique is
known to have excellent repeatability for insulator pollution tests, Vitet et al 366 have found large variations in the maximum
varistor-temperature under tests with identical salinity. However, these authors provided no satisfactory explanation for such
a large dispersion of the test results. The final column includes some possible modifications to make the method more
versatile, if deemed necessary. As already mentioned, the effect of the drying periods in the Salt-Fog test is somewhat
controversial. Furthermore, the repetition of the partial wetting test - with the wet contaminant applied to the upper half whilst
keeping the lower half clean and dry - would cause a temperature rise in different units. This practise would remove one of
the major objections against this test.
Table 9-1: Comparison of pollution test techniques to model pollution stress for varistor block heating.
TEST
TECHNIQUE
CONTAMINANT
CONTROLLING
THERMAL
REPRESENT-
REPEAT-
STANDARDISATION
POSSIBLE
APPLICATION
PARAMETERS
EFFECTS
ATIVE
ABILITY
EXPERIENCE
MODIFICATIONS
Salt-Fog
Complete arrester
Substantial
Good
Good
Complete arrester
Mild
Good
Good
Slurry
Complete arrester
Substantial
Fair
Good
Partial Wetting
Lower half
-Cycle duration
-Cycles per test
- Slurry resistivity
-Cycle duration
-Cycles per test
- Slurry resistivity
Inclusion of drying
periods
Solid-Layer
-Nozzle pressure
-Liquid flow rate
-Test duration
-Steam flow rate
-Test duration
Substantial
Fair
Very Good
ANSI/IEEE
C62.11-1987
In April 1998, the IEC issued Amendment 1 to IEC standard 60099-4: "Artificial pollution test with respect to the thermal
stress on porcelain-housed, multi-unit metal-oxide surge arresters"374. A brief summary of the salient features of that
document is given below.
A basic feature of this document is contained in a table that correlates the flow of external charge - qz per hour per metre of
arrester housing diameter - to the minimum creepage distance, for the range 16-31 mm/kV - which correspond to the different
pollution zones specified in IEC guide 815. For a 2h-event, qz varies in the range 0.5 to 55 C/h.m, while for a 6h-event it
varies in the range 0.24 to 36 C/h.m. The implicit assumptions here are that the external charge is determined by the specific
leakage path for all climatic and pollution conditions - e.g. industrial, marine, desert etc - and that the external charge flow is
proportional to the arrester housing diameter. An estimate of the upper limit of the arrester block temperature rise is first
made, assuming that all the expected charge will flow internally. If this estimated temperature rise Tzmax is below 40 oC, no
pollution test is required. If Tzmax is equal to or greater than 40 oC, there are two options: either carry out a pollution test or
omit that test and carry out the duty-cycle test by preheating the arrester to 20 oC + Tzmax. If carried out, the purpose of this
pollution test will be to determine the ratio of the internal- to the external-charge flow for the different arrester units. The
temperature of the internal parts may be measured instead of the internal charge. Two options for the pollution-test technique
are permitted in IEC 60099-4, Amendment 1: the slurry method and the Salt-Fog method.
In effect, the slurry test that is described comprises a wet contaminant - having a volume resistivity in the range 400 to
500 cm - that is applied uniformly to the whole arrester housing surface and with no wetting subsequent to the application of
the voltage.
1999-09-01
140
The Salt-Fog test that is prescribed is performed at two steps below the withstand salinity of the arrester housing. The test
cycle comprises 15 minutes of fog application under voltage followed by 15 minutes of energisation without fog (drying
period). As mentioned previously, the drying period under voltage can be an important factor 361.
With the so determined division of the charge flow between the external and the internal paths, and by using the external
charge severity table referred to above, a new estimate Tz of the block temperature is calculated. If Tz < 40 oC, the arrester
is preheated to 60 oC to carry out the duty cycle test. Otherwise, preheating will be to 20 oC + Tz.
1999-09-01
141
PIN CAVITY
OVERALL
AXIAL
LEAKAGE
FORM
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
PATH
FACTOR
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
34
297
140
426
CEGB 374 kN
381
200
565
124
ENEL 120 kN
280
145
410
124
PROFILE
0.78
REF.
376
Doulton 6672
47
380
190
611
0.9
377
IEEE
39
254
146
305
0.62
378
NGK 820 kN
460
290
800
379
NGK 680 kN
440
280
750
379
394
210
592
LEAKAGE
PATH /
CERL Reference A
29
Longrod designs
CORE
SHED
DIAMETER
SPACING
0.86
378
SHED
L7524SN/1360
1.15m length, 24
sheds
1999-09-01
75
200
142
46
164
197
Table 10-2: Details for substation insulators (Tapered Barrel/Post); Refer Table 10-24.
TYPE
PROFILE
CORE DIAMETER
(AVERAGE)
(mm)
OVERALL
DIAMETER
AXIAL
LENGTH
(m)
LEAKAGE
FORM
PATH
FACTOR
REF
.
Plain Shed
790
(mm)
min
810
496
890
650
3.2
12.90
0.28
376
405
800
490
3.07
10.82
0.37
376
496
870
630
3.50
11.94
0.30
376
716
1160
780
2.94
10.16
0.23
376
1999-09-01
143
(m)
max
570
3.5
10.29
0.15
376
Table 10-3: Details for substation insulators (Parallel Barrel / Post); Refer Table 10-24.
TYPE
CORE DIAMETER
(AVERAGE)
(mm)
628
OVERALL
LEAKAGE
FORM
PATH
FACTOR
(mm)
920
AXIAL
LENGTH
(m)
3.39
(m)
13.60
0.21
376
314
450
3.65
8.69
0.17
376
868
1090
3.73
11.86
0.17
376
498
740
3.46
11.02
0.29
376
623
877
3.40
11.72
0.24
376
Italian 2-unit
plain shed
740
920
3.37
7.95
0.17
376
National Grid
V1 interrupter
head
260
384
1.25
3.52
0.16
129
Easy Grease
shed abcb
support
1999-09-01
PROFILE
DIAMETER
144
REF.
PROFILE
CERL
Reference Post
CORE DIAMETER
(AVERAGE)
(mm)
230
OVERALL
AXIAL
LENGTH
(m)
3.80
DIAMETER
(mm)
484
LEAKAGE
FORM
PATH
FACTOR
REF.
(m)
12.67
0.32
375
PROFILE
CORE DIAMETER
(AVERAGE)
(mm)
OVERALL
DIAMETER
AXIAL
LENGTH
(m)
LEAKAGE
FORM
PATH
FACTOR
REF.
260
(mm)
Long
400
260
400
360
1.85
6.70
0.31
375
New Circuit
Breaker P1
230
410
350
3.80
14.21
0.40
375
New Circuit
Breaker P2
230
356
314
3.80
14.01
0.34
375
National Grid P1
234
376
336
1.30
4.30
0.34
129
1999-09-01
145
(m)
Short
380
1.85
7.42
9.34
375
Table 10-5: Details for post and cap and pin insulators; Refer Table 10-25. From reference 125.
TYPE
PROFILE
PIN CAVITY
OVERALL
AXIAL
DIAMETER
SPACING
LEAKAGE
PATH (mm)
FORM
DIAMETER
(mm)
317
(mm)
527
(mm)
110
352 to 385
0.28
IV Standard disc
Cap and pin
14
254
140
298
0.8
24
381
186
587
1.01
VI Long creepage
a.f. Cap and pin
27
415
170
636
1.08
Table 10-6: Details for cap and pin and pedestal post insulators; Refer Table 10-26. From reference 197.
TYPE
PIN CAVITY
DIAMETER
OVERALL
SHED
DIAMETER
SPACING
LEAKAGE
PATH (mm)
(mm)
-
(mm)
263
(mm)
-
319
250
250
438
1999-09-01
PROFILE
146
FACTOR
Table 10-7: Details for barrel insulators; Refer Table 10-26. From reference 197.
TYPE
CORE
OVERALL
SHED
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
1a
(mm)
113
(mm)
269
(mm)
53
1b
69
163
50
2b
100
181
56
2c
113
213
50
2d
125
225
56
2e
113
244
38
4a
138
250
56
4b
75
200
50
5a
75
156
31
5b
88
169
31
8a
125
263
69
9c
300
400
62
8b
(Alternating long
and short shed)
119
256
31 / 73
9b
(Alternating long
and short shed)
250
375
25/38
1999-09-01
PROFILE
147
LEAKAGE
PATH (mm)
Table 10-8: Details for cap and pin insulators; Refer Table 10-27 and Table 10-28. From reference 380.
TYPE
PIN CAVITY
OVERALL
AXIAL
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
LEAKAGE
PATH (mm)
I 4-skirt, a.f.
(mm)
50
(mm)
321
(mm)
165
508
II 5-skirt
40
318
165
508
42
275
146
356
356
171
566
46
381
187
478
VI 5-skirt
49
321
175
502
267
159
483
VIII 5-skirt
49
321
165
508
IX
43
282
149
457
X 6-skirt
40
267
146
406
XI 4-skirt, 1 long
356
171
566
XIV Aerodynamic
profile
39
425
159
356
1999-09-01
PROFILE
148
Table 10-9: Details for post and longrod insulators, Refer Table 10-27. From reference 380.
TYPE
CORE
OVERALL
SHED
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
LEAKAGE
PATH (mm)
XII Longrod
(mm)
97
(mm)
289
(mm)
64
210
165
283
84
180
146
260
57
188
125
233
54
149
165
254
50
161
XXVI 3-shed
Pedestal Post
432
864
165
337
88
252
1999-09-01
PROFILE
149
Table 10-10: Details for cap and pin insulators; Refer Table 10-29. From reference 315.
TYPE*
PROFILE
PIN CAVITY
OVERALL
AXIAL
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
LEAKAGE
PATH (mm)
V1 Flat profile
(mm)
37.5
(mm)
380
(mm)
130
340
V2 Standard
37.5
280
146
386
V3 Long leakage
44
320
170
534
V4 Very long
leakage
47.5
355
171
571
P1 Long leakage
45
292
149
470
P2 Standard
39
254
146
305
1999-09-01
150
Table 10-11: Details for cap and pin insulators; Refer Table 10-30. From reference 380.
TYPE
PIN CAVITY
OVERALL
AXIAL
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
LEAKAGE
PATH (mm)
(mm)
P3, 4-skirt
(mm)
321
(mm)
171
546
A, 4-skirt
254
146
394
B, 4-skirt
320
170
530
D, 4-skirt
400
159
603
E, 5-skirt
380
195
690
G, 4-skirt
254
159
432
H, 5-skirt
330
170
546
J, 5-skirt
267
146
457
K, 4-skirt
321
165
508
M, 5-skirt
290
160
470
N, 5-skirt
260
160
621
1999-09-01
PROFILE
151
Table 10-12: Details for post and longrod insulators; Refer Table 10-30. From reference 381.
INSULATOR
NO *
INSULATOR
TYPE ***
CORE
OVERALL
SHED
LEAKAGE
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
PATH
(mm)
41
37
48
66
63
56
84
50
62
62
62
95
19/64
19/64
(mm)**
120
149
159
174
224
237
253
227
242
273
323
355
215/87
214/62
(mm)
(mm)
0
Long rod
73
200
1
I, Plain shed, post
233
360
1A
I, Plain shed, post
233
360
2
I, Plain shed, post
233
360
3
I, Plain shed, post
235
400
4
I, Plain shed, post
230
420
5
I, Plain shed, post
250
420
6
II, 3 skirt, post
237
370
7
II, 3 skirt, post
237
370
8
II, 3 skirt, post
235
400
9
II, 3 skirt, post
240
430
10
II, 3 skirt, post
240
430
11
III, ALS shed, post
236
420
12
III, ALS shed, post
236
420
Notes: *
: Insulator designation as used in reference
** : Leakage path per shed; i.e. for quoted shed spacing
*** : Profiles of Insulator type I, II, II are given below
I, Plain shed, post
Table 10-13: Details for cap and pin insulators; Refer Table 10-31 and Table 10-32. From reference 199.
TYPE
PIN CAVITY
OVERALL
AXIAL
LEAKAGE
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
PATH
A, standard
(mm)
-
(mm)
254
(mm)
146
(mm)
280
B1, Fog
B2, Fog
254
320
146
170
430
550
C1,
C2,
C3,
C4,
280
320
320
400
146
165
170
195
445
512
545
635
180
875
2085
d.c.
d.c.
d.c., extra creepage
d.c., very long creepage
D, Longrod
1999-09-01
PROFILE
152
Table 10-14: Details for post insulators; Refer Table 10-32. From reference 199.
TYPE
PROFILE
CORE
OVERALL
SHED
LEAKAGE
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
PATH
(mm)
(mm)
Deep-rib profile
(mm)
65
(mm)*
236
Under-rib profile
50
157
Table 10-15: Details for polymeric longrod insulators; Refer Table 10-34, Table 10-35 and Table 10-40. From references
126 and 127.
TYPE *
PROFILE
CORE
OVERALL
SHED
LEAKAGE
DIAMETER
DIAMETE
R (mm)
SPACING
PATH
110
(mm)
66
(mm)***
158
EPDM
(mm)
24
VI
EPDM **
31
134/102
36/90
216
35
134
49
118
VIII EPR
38
171
61
146
Notes: *
: Description as used in reference
** : Alternate long and short shed design
*** : For quoted shed spacing; i.e. between two large sheds for design VI
1999-09-01
153
Table 10-16: Details for polymeric longrod insulators; Refer Table 10-36. From reference 381.
TYPE
PROFILE
CORE
OVERALL
SHED
LEAKAGE
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
PATH
(mm)
34
(mm)
92
(mm)
32
(mm)
79
42
164
55
139
43
127
66
155
44
123
60
222
40
178
65
156
Table 10-17: Details for polymeric longrod insulators; Refer Table 10-37. From reference 380.
TYPE
PROFILE
CORE
OVERALL
SHED
LEAKAGE
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
PATH
XIII
(mm)
61
(mm)
222
(mm)
100
(mm)
200
XXVII
25
130
40
110
Table 10-18: Details for polymeric longrod insulators; Refer Table 10-38. From reference 315.
INSULATOR
NO * AND
PROFILE
INSULATOR
TYPE
CORE
OVERALL
SHED
LEAKAGE
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
PATH
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)**
Low slope
35
160
35
134
35
160
45
158
Mean slope
35
160
55
167
35
160
45
169
High slope
35
160
45
172
35
160
55
200
A
B
E
F
I
J
Notes: *
**
1999-09-01
154
Table 10-19: Details for cap and pin insulators; Refer Figure 10-1. From reference 111.
TYPE
PROFILE
PIN CAVITY
OVERALL
AXIAL
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
LEAKAGE
PATH (mm)
A-11
(mm)
-
(mm)
254
(mm)
146
305
A-12
254
130
305
A2
290
178
395
B2
280
165
370
B3
320
198
425
C2
280
172
370
C4
400
244
535
D5
380
220
495
Table 10-20: Details for cap and pin insulators; Refer Figure 10-2. From reference 382.
TYPE
PIN CAVITY
OVERALL
AXIAL
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
LEAKAGE
PATH (mm)
(mm)
-
(mm)
254
(mm)
146
280
280
170
370
320
195
425
1999-09-01
PROFILE
155
Table 10-21: Details for cap and pin insulators; Refer Figure 10-3. From references 22, 124 and 143.
TYPE
PIN CAVITY
OVERALL
AXIAL
DIAMETER
DIAMETER
SPACING
LEAKAGE
PATH (mm)
A (A)
(mm)
-
(mm)
254
(mm)
146
305
B (B)
254
146
390
254
130
270
279
140
433
381
200
560
355
171
530
280
145
300
280
145
400
1a
254
146
290
1b
254
146
290
2a
254
146
390
2b
254
146
390
1999-09-01
PICTURE
156
Table 10-22: Details for cylindrical Insulators (Parallel Barrel); Refer Figure 3-11. From reference 85.
TYPE
PROFILE
CORE
SHED
SHED
DIAMETER
PROJECTION
SPACING
(mm)
Various
(mm)
70
(mm)
70
238
Various
65
65
250
Various
70
70
190
Various
70
70
203
Various
120
92
407
Table 10-23: Details for interrupter head insulators (Parallel Barrel); Refer Figure 3-17. From reference 129.
TYPE
PROFILE
CORE
V1
(mm)
260
OVERALL
DIAMETER
(mm)
384
(mm)
52
AXIAL
LENGTH
(mm)
1250
(mm)
3520
H1
340
426
36
1500
4800
H2
380
616
70
1100
3600
H3
380
500
34
1100
4000
H4
380
584
70
1500
4650
DIAMETER
1999-09-01
157
SHED
SPACING
LEAKAGE
PATH
Insulator Type **
National Grid P1,
CEGB 70/60 profile,
CEGB 374 kN,
New Circuit Breaker P2,
3-skirt a.f. shed abcb support,
New Circuit Breaker P1,
L75/24SN/1360,
Easygrease shed abcb support,
CEGB 70/50 profile,
ENEL 120 kN,
Allied 54656,
National Grid V1 Interrupter Head,
3-skirt a.f. shed sealing end,
2-skirt a.f. shed SF6-filled c.t.i.,
2-skirt a.f. shed abcb support 1,
2-skirt a.f. shed Oil c.t.i.,
Doulton 6672,
2-skirt a.f. shed abcb support 2,
2-skirt a.f. shed abcb support,
Italian 2-unit plain shed,
Plain shed,
IEEE,
NGK 820 kN,
2-unit plain shed,
NGK 680 kN,
CERL Reference,
CERL Reference A,
Ref.
Post
Post
Cap & pin
Parallel Post
Tapered barrel
Parallel Post
Longrod
Parallel barrel
Post
Cap & pin
Cap & Pin
Parallel Barrel
Tapered barrel
Parallel Barrel
Parallel Barrel
Tapered Barrel
Cap & pin
Parallel Barrel
Tapered Barrel
Parallel Barrel
Tapered Barrel
Cap & Pin
Cap & Pin
Parallel Barrel
Cap & Pin
Parallel Post
Cap & Pin
129
375
124
375
376
375
197
376
375
124
376
129
376
376
376
376
377
376
376
376
376
378
379
376
379
375
378
Axial Stress
kV/m ***
91
84
76
76
74
73
73
71
70
69
66
68
66
60
60
59
58
58
58
53
53
51
47
47
46
46
44
Surface Stress
kV/m ****
28
21
27
21
18
20
21
17
19
24
22
24
19
19
19
17
18
17
17
23
18
24
17
20
17
14
16
Notes:
*
**
***
****
a.f.
c.t.i.
abcb
1999-09-01
All tests made with a salt-fog of 80 kg/m3 except those reported in reference 197 which were at an
ESDD of 0.6 mg/cm2
Name by which the insulator is specified in the relevant reference
Axial stress is voltage divided by axial distance between metal fittings
Surface stress is voltage divided by leakage path length
antifog
current transformer insulator
air blast circuit breaker
158
Table 10-25: a.c. Ceramic insulators, vertically mounted; flashover performance under marine pollution at BITS *.
Ranking
No
1
2
3
4
5
Notes:
*
**
***
****
Insulator Type **
VI Long creepage a.f. Cap & Pin
V a.f. Cap & pin
III Multiple cone Post
IV Standard disc Cap & Pin
I a.f. Cap & Pin (CERL Reference A)
FOM ***
(Average)
1.19
1.08
1.07
1.00
1.00
LPR ****
0.89
0.79
0.93
1.32
1.00
Table 10-26: a.c. Ceramic insulators, vertically mounted; flashover performance under natural pollution in Sweden *.
Ranking
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Notes:
*
**
***
1999-09-01
Insulator Type
6a,
8a,
1a,
6b,
2b,
7,
6c,
1b,
2e,
9c,
8b1,
2c,
2a,
4a,
4b,
5a,
2d,
8b2,
9b,
5b,
Specific Leakage
(mm/kV, System) **
10.4
10.8
11.7
11.7
11.8
11.8
11.8
12.2
13.1
13.4
13.9
14.5
14.6
15.2
15.5
15.6
15.9
15.9
16.7
19
Volt/LP
(kV/m) ***
56
54
50
50
49
49
49
48
44
43
42
40
40
38
37
37
37
37
35
31
159
Table 10-27: Critical d.c. flashover strength of ceramic insulators, vertically mounted; negative polarity; performance in
artificial pollution, using spray fog and Portland cement *.
Ranking
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Notes:
*
**
a.f.
No **
XI
VIII
I
IV
II
XXX
XXVI
XIV
VI
X
VII
XII
XXII
XXIII
XXI
III
XXV
Insulator
Type
4-skirt, 1 long, Cap & Pin
5-skirt, Cap & Pin
4-skirt, a.f., Cap & Pin
1 very long skirt, Cap & Pin
5-skirt, Cap & Pin
Multiple cone, Post
3-shed, Pedestal Post
Aerodynamic Profile Cap & Pin
5-skirt, Cap & Pin
6-skirt, Cap & Pin
4-skirt, (2 long), Cap & Pin
Longrod
Parallel Post
Parallel Post
Parallel Post
Bell shape, Cap & Pin
Parallel Post
Axial Stress
kV/m
178
158
149
149
146
143
141
139
139
132
129
125
123
113
111
110
103
Surface Stress
kV/m
54
51
48
45
47
57
60
63
48
47
43
57
44
45
41
46
43
Table 10-28: Critical d.c. flashover strength of ceramic insulators, vertically mounted; negative polarity; performance in
artificial pollution, using spray fog and kaolin plus salt at ESDD = 0.2 mg/cm2 *.
Ranking
No
1
2
3
4
Notes:
*
**
a.f.
No **
I
VI
IV
VIII
Insulator
Type
4-skirt, a.f., Cap & Pin
5-skirt, Cap & Pin
1 very long skirt, Cap & Pin
5-skirt, Cap & Pin
Axial Stress
kV/m
236
209
185
171
Surface Stress
kV/m
76
72
56
55
Table 10-29: Critical d.c. flashover stress for ceramic insulators, vertically mounted; positive polarity; performance in
artificial pollution using (a) Salt-Fog test and (b) Clean-Fog test *.
No
***
Insulator **
Type of
Cap & Pin unit
Ranking
No
Salt-Fog test
Axial
Surface
Stress
Stress
kV/m
kV/m
102
32
80
24
67
26
63
24
54
17
44
21
Ranking
No
Clean-Fog test
Axial
Surface
Stress
Stress
kV/m
kV/m
99
32
102
31
113
45
103
40
88
28
71
34
V3 Long leakage
1
4
V4 Very long leakage
2
3
V2 Standard
3
1
V1 Flat profile
4
2
P1 Long leakage
5
5
P2 Standard
6
6
Notes:
*
Data from reference 315
**
Insulator number and description are those used in reference 315
***
V in number designates glass insulator; P in the number designates porcelain insulator
1999-09-01
160
Table 10-30: Critical d.c. flashover strength of ceramic insulators, vertically mounted; negative polarity; performance in
artificial pollution, using clean-fog and kaolin plus salt at ESDD = 0.05 mg/cm2 *.
Ranking
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Notes:
*
**
***
P3
No **
K
E
D
B
J
0
P3
N
H
A
M
10
12
9
8
11
7
G
3
1A
6
2
5
1
4
Insulator
Type
4-skirt, Cap & Pin
5-skirt, Cap & Pin
4-skirt, Cap & Pin
4-skirt, Cap & Pin
5-skirt, Cap & Pin
Longrod
4-skirt, Cap & Pin
5-skirt, Cap & Pin
5-skirt, Cap & Pin
4-skirt, Cap & Pin
5-skirt, Cap & Pin
II, 3-skirt, Post
III, ALS shed, Post
II, 3-Skirt, Post
II, 3-skirt, Post
III, ALS shed, Post
II, 3-skirt, Post
4-skirt, Cap & Pin
I, plain shed, Post
I, plain shed, Post
II, 3-skirt, Post
I, plain shed, Post
I, plain shed, Post
I, plain shed, Post
I, plain shed, Post
Axial Stress
kV/m
81
80
80
77
77
74
68
67
63
62
61
59
59
59
57
55
54
53
53
52
51
50
50
50
47
Surface Stress
kV/m
26
23
21
25
25
26
21
17
20
23
21
20
18
15
17
15
19
20
20
21
16
24
20
17
15
Table 10-31: d.c. Flashover performance of ceramic line insulators; vertically mounted; natural saline pollution *.
Ranking
No **
1
2
3
4
5
Notes:
*
**
***
****
*****
1999-09-01
Insulator ***
No
C2
B1
B2
A
D
Type
d.c. Cap & Pin
Fog Cap & Pin
Fog Cap & Pin, Extra creepage
Standard Cap & Pin
Longrod
Axial length
ratio ****
0.74
0.77
0.79
1.0
1.0
Leakage path
ratio *****
1.42
1.18
1.49
1.0
1.24
161
Table 10-32: Critical d.c. flashover stress for ceramic insulators, vertically mounted; performance in artificial pollution,
using Clean-Fog test with Tonoko plus NaCl at ESDD = 0.05 mg/cm2 *.
Ranking
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
Notes:
*
**
No **
C4
C3
C1
A
Insulator
Type
d.c. Cap & Pin very long creepage
d.c. Cap & Pin extra creepage
Post, Deep-rib profile
d.c. Cap & Pin
Post, Under-rib profile
Cap and Pin, Standard Profile
Axial Stress
kV/m
92
90
90
86
68
65
Surface Stress
kV/m
28
28
25
29
22
34
Table 10-33: d.c. Withstand stress for a porcelain housing, vertically mounted, as a function of its average diameter;
performance in artificial pollution using Clean-Fog test with ESDD of 0.12 mg/cm2 *.
Average diameter, mm
200
270
400
560
Axial Stress, kV/m
67
54
48
42
Surface Stress, kV/m **
23
19
17
15
Notes:
*
Data from reference 199
**
Average values for a normal profile and an under-rib profile
680
36
13
****
Insulator Type **
FOM ***
(Average)
>1.53
1.21
1.17
1.12
0.9
LPR ****
<2.5
1.25
1.16
2.27
0.56
Table 10-35: a.c. Polymeric insulators, vertically mounted; performance in artificial salt-fog of 80 kg/m3 *.
Ranking
No
1
2
3
4
Notes:
*
**
1999-09-01
Insulator Type **
VI EPDM
VIII EPR
V EPDM
VII Silicone rubber
Axial Stress
kV/m
82
75
67
61
162
Surface Stress
kV/m
34
31
28
25
Table 10-36: Critical d.c. flashover strength of polymeric insulators, vertically mounted; negative polarity; performance in
artificial pollution, using Clean-Fog test with kaolin plus NaCl at ESDD = 0.05 mg/cm2 *.
Ranking
No
1
2
3
4
5
Notes:
*
**
Insulator
No **
S
V
R
W
T
Axial Stress
kV/m
124
104
100
90
78
Type
?
?
?
?
?
Surface Stress
kV/m
50
28
40
38
33
Table 10-37: Critical d.c. flashover strength of polymeric insulators, vertically mounted; negative polarity; performance in
artificial pollution, using Spray fog and Portland cement *.
Ranking
No
1
2
Notes:
*
**
No **
XXVII
XIII
Insulator
Type
Silicone rubber
EPDM
Axial Stress
kV/m
159
138
Surface Stress
kV/m
59
69
Table 10-38: Critical d.c. flashover stress for polymeric insulators, vertically mounted; positive polarity; performance in
artificial pollution using (a) Salt-Fog test and (b) Clean-Fog test. *
No
F
J
E
I
B
A
Notes:
Insulator **
Type of
Cap & Pin unit
Mean slope with rib
High slope with rib
mean slope
high slope
low slope with rib
low slope
*
**
***
****
1999-09-01
163
Figure 10-1: Laboratory a.c. test results, using solid layer method, for cap and pin insulators; showing specific creepage at
50% flashover vs. SDD 111.
Figure 10-2: Laboratory a.c. test results, using solid layer method, for cap and pin insulators; showing specific creepage at
50% flashover vs. SDD 382
1999-09-01
164
Figure 10-3: A.c. test results from various laboratories, using Salt-Fog method, for cap and pin insulators; showing specific
creepage at withstand vs salinity 22 143 124
Insulator
condition
Mean flashover
voltage kV
Comments
New
108
Tested after
some
conditioning
discharges,
but no surface
abrasion
After being in
service Years
2.5
5
54
51
Having been
exposed to marine
pollution of very
heavy severity
Silicone oil
71
Hydrocarbon grease
>134
Rapid loss of
water repellency
during test
Non-oily
appearance,
but still water
repellent at end
of test
Evidence of tracking
on insulator surface on
completion of test
Notes:
*
Table 10-40: a.c. Flashover stress of new and aged polymeric insulators in artificial salt-fog pollution *.
Flashover stress at 80 kg/m3 salinity, kV/m
Insulator type **
New
Aged 6 months
Aged 4 years
EPDM VI
89
88
79
Silicone rubber, VII
75
61
Notes:
*
Data from reference 378
**
Insulator number as used in reference 378
1999-09-01
165
11. REFERENCES
1
Lambeth PJ,
Effect of pollution on high-voltage outdoor insulators, Proc. IEE, IEE Reviews, Vol. 118, No. 9R, Sept. 1971, pp. 1107-1130.
Rizk FAM,
A systematical approach to high voltage insulator selection for polluted environment, The second regional conference in Arab countries
Amman, Jordan, 1997 May 12-14.
Rizk FAM,
Mathematical models for pollution flashover, Electra No. 78, 1981, pp. 71-103.
Obenaus F,
Fremdschichtueberschlag und Kriechweglaenge, Deutche Elektrotechnik, vol. 4, 1958, pp. 135-136.
Neumarker G,
Verschutzungszustand und Kriechweg, Monatsber. D. Deut. Akad. Wis., Berln, Vol. 1, 1959, pp. 352-359.
10
Hampton BF,
Flashover mechanism of polluted insulators, Proc. IEE, Vol. II, No. 5, July, 1964, pp. 985-990.
11
Boehme H, Obenaus F,
Polluted flashover tests on insulators in the laboratory and in systems and the model concept of creepage path flashover, Cigr 21st
session, Paris, Paper no. 407, 1966.
12
13
Naecke NH,
Stabilitaet der Fremdschichtentladungen und Theorie des Fremdschichtuberschlags, ETZ-A, No. 16, 1966, pp. 577-585.
14
Wilkens R,
Flashover voltage of high voltage insulators with uniform surface-pollution films, Proc. IEE, Vol. 116, No. 3, 1969, pp. 457.
15
Erler F,
Zum Kriechueberschlag dicker Isolatoren bei Wechselspannung, Elektrie, Vol. 3, 1969, pp. 100-102.
16
17
Rizk FAM,
HVDC source requirements in polluted insulator tests, Electra No. 136, June, 1991, pp. 97-111.
18
19
Rizk FAM,
Analysis of dielectric recovery with reference to dry-zone areas on polluted Insulators, IEEE/PES Winter Meeting, New York, N.Y.,
Conference paper No. 71 CP 134-PWR, 1971.
20
Claverie P,
Predetermination of the Behaviour of Polluted Insulators, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-92, No. 4,
July/Aug., 1973, pp. 1902-1908.
21
1999-09-01
167
22
23
24
Erler F,
Neue Erkenntnisse ber die Vorlichtbogenverlngerung whrend des Kriechberschlages dicker Isolatoren bein Impuls und
Wechselspannung, Doctoral Thesis, Dresden University of Technology, 1970.
25
Mosch W, Lemke E,
Switching surge flashover of insulators under pollution condition, IIT Madras, 1981.
26
Toepler M,
Zur Kenntnis der Gesetze der Gleitfunkenbildung, Annalen der Physik 21-1906, 1906, pp. 193-222.
27
Lemke E,
Durchschlagmechanismus und Schlagweite - Durchschlagspannungs-Kennlinien von inhomogenen Luftfunkenstrecken bei
Schaltspannungen, Doctoral Thesis, Dresden University of Technology, 1967.
28
Lemke E, Zhrih M,
SI flashover model for long insulators under contaminated condition, 7th International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering
(ISH), Dresden, Germany, paper 43.22, Aug 26-30, 1991.
29
Obenaus F,
Der Einfluss von Oberflchenbelag (Tau - Nebel - Salz - Schmutz) auf die berschlagspannung von Isolatoren, Hescho-Mitteilungen,
H. 70, 1933, pp. 2203-2239.
30
31
32
33
34
Kaiser G,
The mouse buzzard as a cause of breakdown on 110 kV single pole high tension lines, ETZ-A, June, 1970.
35
36
Burnham JT,
Bird streamer flashovers on FLP transmission lines, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 10, No. 2, April, 1995, pp. 970-977.
37
38
39
Williams LJ, Kim JH, Kim YB, Arai N, Shimoda O, Holte KC,
Contaminated insulators - Chemical dependence of flashover voltages and salt migration, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and
Systems, Vol. PAS-93, No. 5, Sept./Oct., 1974, pp. 1572-1580.
40
41
42
1999-09-01
168
43
Eskom,
Internal fault report, Unpublished document.
44
45
46
Parraud R,
Pollution performance of silicone due to the recovery mechanism, Cigr colloquium SC 33-93, New Delhi India, paper 23, 1993.
47
48
49
50
51
Tominaga A,
Moisture absorption and leakage resistance on contaminated surfaces, Electrical Engineering in Japan, vol. 85, No.1, 1965, pp. 33-42.
52
53
De Decker D, Wright S,
Recovery and hydrophobicity transfer in silicone, Proc. of the International Workshop on Non-Ceramic Outdoor Insulation, Socit des
Electriciens et des Electroniciens (SEE), Paris, April 15-16, 1993, pp. 56-61.
54
Looms JST,
Insulators for high voltages, Book, IEE Power Engineering Series No. 7, Peter Peregrinus Ltd, 1988.
55
56
Annestrand A, Schei A,
A test procedure for artificial pollution tests on direct voltage, Direct Current, Feb., 1967, pp. 1-8.
57
58
59
60
61
Znaidi R,
Composite insulators: Results of outdoor and laboratory experiments in Tunisia, Proc. of the International Workshop on Non-Ceramic
Outdoor Insulation, Socit des Electriciens et des Electroniciens (SEE), Paris, April 15-16, 1993.
62
63
1999-09-01
169
64
65
Heise W, Koethe K,
ber das Isoliervermgen von ungleichmig verschmutzten Hochspannungsisolatoren bei betriebsfrequenter Wechselspannung, ETZA, H. 22, Oct, 1966, (in German).
66
67
68
Karady G,
The effect of fog parameters on the testing of artificially contaminated insulator in a fog chamber, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and
Systems, Vol. PAS-94, No. 2, March/April, 1975, pp. 378-387.
69
Chrzan K, Pohl Z,
Hygroscopic properties of pollutants on HV Insulators, IEEE Trans. on Electrical Insulation, Vol. EI-24, No. 1, Feb., 1989, pp. 107112.
70
71
72
Fujimura T, Naito K,
Electrical Phenomena and high voltage insulators, International Symposium on Ceramics, Bangalore India, Nov. 29-30, 1982.
73
74
75
Kawamura T, Isaka K,
Humidity dependence of moisture absorption, leakage current and flashover voltage on contaminated insulator surfaces, Electrical
Engineering in Japan, vol. 93, no. 5, 1973.
76
77
78
79
80
Akbar M,
A discussion on the effect of insulator shape on pollution build up based on results from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, Unpublished
document.
81
82
83
1999-09-01
170
84
85
86
87
Schneider HM,
Measurements of contamination on post insulators in HVDC converter stations, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan.,
1988, pp. 398-404.
88
89
Cimador A, Vitet S,
Insulator pollution, Bulletin de la direction des Etudes et Recherches Serie B No. 2, 1991.
90
91
92
Philling J, Bernd L,
Influence of conducting precipitation on the flashover voltage of contaminated insulators, 5th International Symposium on High
Voltage Engineering (ISH), Braunschweig, Germany, Paper 52.09, Aug. 24-28, 1987.
93
Zedan F, Akbar M,
Part IV Study of insulators at a semi-coastal site in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 6, No. 1,
Jan., 1991, pp. 439-447.
94
95
Farzaneh M, Kiernicki J,
Flashover problems caused by Ice build-up on insulators, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, March/April, 1995, pp. 5-7.
96
97
98
IEC TC 11,
Overhead lines - Meteorological data for assessing climatic loads, Document 11(Sec.)90 /CD.
99
100
101
Karady GG,
Outdoor insulations, 6th International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering (ISH), New Orleans, USA, paper 30.01, Aug. 28Sept.1, 1989.
102
103
104
105
Kindesberger J, Kuhl M,
Effect of hydrophobicity, on insulator performance, 6th International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering (ISH), New Orleans,
USA, paper 12.01, Aug. 28-Sept.1, 1989.
1999-09-01
171
106
107
Pigini A,
Private communication.
108
Baker AC, Zaffanella LE, Anzivino LD, Schneider HM, Moran JH,
Contamination performance of HVDC station post insulators, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 3, No. 4, Oct., 1988, pp. 19681975.
109
Naito K,
External insulation design of HVDC transmission lines and stations, NGK Technical Note, No. TN-855047, May, 1985.
110
111
112
Kawai M,
Research at project UHV on the performance of contaminated insulators, Part I Basic problems, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and
Systems, Vol. PAS-92, No. 3, May/June, 1973, pp. 1111-1120.
113
114
115
Naito K,
Contaminated insulator performance in HVDC lines and stations, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference, Panel session,
New Orleans, Editorial revision made on Feb 2 1990, April 2-7, 1989.
116
Gutman IY, Kinevsky VR, Trifonov VZ, Vladimirsky LL, Yashin YN,
Dielectric strength of polluted EHV insulation, Cigr 32nd session, Paris, Paper no. 33-08, Aug. 28 - Sept. 3, 1988.
117
118
119
120
121
Houlgate RG,
The performance of composite insulators in a coastal environment, IEE Digest No. 1992/182, Oct., 1992.
122
123
124
125
126
1999-09-01
172
127
Swift DA,
High voltage designs using polymeric materials: performance under salt pollution, IEE Int. Conference on Overhead Line Design and
Construction, Theory and Practise up to 150 kV, London, Nov., 1988.
128
Houlgate RG,
Private communication.
129
130
131
132
133
Carrara C, Chitarin G,
The problem of voltage distribution measurement along insulator strings subjected to DC voltage, 4th International Symposium on
High Voltage Engineering (ISH), Athens, Greece, paper 62.11, Sept. 5-9, 1983.
134
Hrnfeldt SP,
DC-probes for electric field distribution measurements, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 6, no. 2, April, 1991, pp. 524-529.
135
136
Hartings R,
Modern experimental techniques to study the discharge phenomena on outdoor insulators, 7th International Symposium on High
Voltage Engineering (ISH), Dresden, Germany, paper 72.10, Aug 26-30, 1991.
137
138
Wikstrm D, Forsberg P,
Flashover performance of post insulators with different heterogeneous wetting properties, 8th International Symposium on High
Voltage Engineering (ISH), Yokohama, Japan, paper 46.06, Aug. 23-27, 1993, Vol.2, pp. 165-168.
139
Hartings R,
Electric fields along a post insulator: AC- measurements and calculations, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 9, No. 2, April, 1994,
pp. 912-918.
140
Hartings R,
The AC behaviour of a hydrophilic and hydrophobic post insulator during rain, IEEE/PES Winter Meeting, Paper No. 94 WM 046-3
PWRD, 1994.
141
142
Moran JH,
The effect of cold switch-on, on semi-conducting glazed insulators, IEEE/PES Winter Meeting, New York, Paper no. C 74 071-7, Jan.
27-Feb.1, 1974.
143
Carrara G, Sforzini M,
Analysis of pollution test methods, IEEE Conference paper No. 68-CP-163, 1968.
144
Ely, Roberts,
Switching impulse flashover of air gaps and insulation in an artificially contaminated atmosphere, Proc. IEE, Vol. 115, No.11, 1968.
145
Okada, Koga,
Switching surge flashover characteristics of long disk insulator strings under polluted conditions, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and
Systems, Vol. PAS-89, No. 3, March, 1970.
146
Lushnikoff, Parnell,
The effects of pollution and surface discharges on the impulse strength of line insulation, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and
Systems, Vol. PAS-90, No. 4, July/Aug., 1971.
147
1999-09-01
173
148
Macchiaroli, Turner,
Switching surge performance of contaminated insulators, IEEE Paper No. 71 TP 141-PWR, 1971.
149
150
151
Kucera, Plechanova,
A probabilistic choice of insulators for alternating voltage and electric strength as switching impulses in the areas with pollution, Cigr
29th session, Paris, Paper no. 33-04, 1982.
152
153
154
155
Macchiaroli, Turner,
Comparison of insulator types by the wet contaminant and Clean-Fog test method, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol.
PAS-89, No. 2, Feb., 1970.
156
157
158
159
160
Ocampo JD,
Calculated prediction of flashover levels on polluted insulation at different altitudes, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Salford, UK, 1994.
161
Rizk FAM,
A criterion for AC flashover of polluted insulators, IEEE/PES Winter Meeting, New York, N.Y., Conference paper No. 71 CP 135PWR, 1971.
162
163
164
Fryxell J, Shei A,
Influence of altitude on the flashover voltage of insulators, Elteknik, Sweden, V9, No. 1, 1966, pp. 1-3.
165
166
167
1999-09-01
174
168
169
Serrano D, Ramirez M,
High altitude AC standard test on polluted insulators, Tecnolab, Vol. XI, No. 62, July, 1995, (in Spanish).
170
171
Mercure HP,
Flashover discharge propagation on polluted insulators, Proc. IEE conference on Electrical Insulation, June, 1984, pp. 106-110.
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
Farzaneh M, Kiernicki J,
Flashover performance of IEEE standard insulators under ice conditions, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 12, No.4, Oct., 1997,
pp. 1602-1613.
180
181
182
183
Sklenicka V, et al,
Influence of conductive ice on electric strength of HV insulators, ISPPISD, Madras, 1983.
184
185
Farzaneh M,
Effect of the thickness of ice and voltage polarity on the flashover voltage of ice-covered high voltage insulators, 7th International
Symposium on High Voltage Engineering (ISH), Dresden, Germany, Paper 43.10, Aug 26-30, 1991.
186
187
Schneider HM,
Artificial ice tests on transmission line insulators - A progress report, IEEE/PES Summer Meeting, San Francisco, USA, Paper A75491-1, July, 1975, pp. 347-353.
188
1999-09-01
175
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
Verma MP,
Insulator design for 1200 kV lines, IEEE Trans. on Electrical Insulation, Vol. EI-16, No. 3, June, 1981.
198
Verma MP,
Insulation performance of d,c, apparatus-housing under pollution, ETZ-Archiv Bd. 5, H.9, 1983.
199
200
201
Lampe W,
Pollution and rain flashovers on wall bushings, Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on properties and applications of dielectric
materials (ICPADM), Beijing China, Vol. 1, pp. 29-32, 1988
202
Lambeth PJ,
Laboratory tests to evaluate HVDC wall bushing performance in wet weather, IEEE/PES Winter meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, Paper No.
90 WM 167-7 PWRD, Feb. 4-8, 1990.
203
204
205
Schneider HM, Hall JF, Nellis CL, Low SS, Lorden DJ,
Rain and contamination tests on HVDC wall bushings with and without RTV coatings, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 6, No. 3,
July, 1991, pp. 1289-1300.
206
207
Krishnayya PCS, Lambeth PJ, Maruvada PS, Trinh NG, Desilets G, Nilsson SL,
An evaluation of the R & D requirements for developing HVDC converter stations for voltages above 600 kV, Cigr 32nd session,
Paris, Paper no. 14-07, Aug. 28 - Sept. 3.
208
1999-09-01
176
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
Naito K, Yamada K,
Electric and magnetic fields produced by power equipment and related guidelines and standards, IEEE Mexico Section Power Meeting,
Paper No. RVP'93-TRA-01, 1993.
224
225
226
227
228
1999-09-01
177
229
230
231
Maddock BJ, Allutt JG, Ferguson JM,Lewis KG, Swift DA, Teare PW, Tunstall MJ,
Some investigations of the ageing of overhead lines, Cigr 31st session, Paris, Paper no. 22-09, 1986.
232
233
Ross PM,
Burning of wood structures by leakage currents, Trans. of the AIEE, Vol. 66, pp. 270-287, 1947.
234
Darveniza M,
Electrical properties of wood and line design, University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia, Queensland, 1980.
235
236
237
238
Filter R,
The influence of wood pole preservatives on wood fire and electric safety, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS103, No. 10, Oct., 1984, pp 3089-3095.
239
240
241
Macey R,
The performance of high voltage, outdoor insulation in contaminated environments, Trans. South African Institute of Electrical
Engineers, pp 80-92, April, 1981.
242
Lannes W, Schneider H,
Pollution severity performance chart; Key to just in time insulator maintenance, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 12, No.4, Oct.,
1997.
243
244
245
Orbin DRH, Swift DA, Insulator pollution severity instruments employing Peltier coolers, 9th International Symposium on High
Voltage Engineering (ISH), Graz, Austria, Paper 3229, Aug. 28-Sept. 1, 1995.
246
Marrone G, Marinoni F,
New apparatus set up at ENEL to monitor pollution deposit and pilot cleaning operations on outdoor insulators, Cigr 36th session,
Paris, Paper no. 33-302, 1996.
247
248
249
1999-09-01
178
250
Holtzhausen JP,
Leakage current monitoring on synthetic insulators at a severe coastal site, Proc. of the International Workshop on Non-Ceramic
Outdoor Insulation, Socit des Electriciens et des Electroniciens (SEE), Paris, April 15-16, 1993.
251
252
253
Riquel G,
Accelerated ageing test for non-ceramic insulators, EDF's experience, Proc. of the International Workshop on Non-Ceramic Outdoor
Insulation, Socit des Electriciens et des Electroniciens (SEE), Paris, April 15-16, 1993.
254
Moreau C, Riquel G,
Accelerated ageing test on 24 kV composite surge arresters, 8th International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering (ISH),
Yokohama, Japan, Paper 25.26, Aug. 23-27, 1993, Vol.1, pp. 251-254.
255
256
257
258
Lambeth PJ,
Variable-voltage application for insulator pollution tests, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 3, No. 4, Oct., 1988.
259
260
261
262
263
Reverey G,
Die Arbeiten zur internationalen Normung eines Fremdschicht-Prfverfahrens fr Isolatoren, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der
Technischen Universitt Dresden, Bd. 16 (1976)), H. 3, 1967, pp. 979-988 (in German).
264
FGH,
Dauerverhalten von Verbund-Langstabisolatoren aus Kunststoff unter natrlichen Fremdschichtbedingungen, FGH Technischer
Bericht Nr. 1-254, 1984, (in German).
265
Lange G,
Einflsse natrlicher Fremdschichten auf die Betriebszuverlssigkeit von Freiluftisolationen - Ergebnisse und Erfahrungen einer 20
jhrigen berwachung der Fremdschichten im 110-kV-Netz der VEW, Elektrizittswirtschaft, Jg.91, 1992, H. 8, 1992, pp. 436-443
(in German).
266
267
268
1999-09-01
179
269
270
271
Ervin CC,
500 kV insulator flashovers at normal operating voltage, CEA Spring meeting, Montreal, Presentation, March, 1988.
272
Leguan G, et al,
AC flashover characteristics of EHV line insulators for high altitude contamination regions, ICPAPM-88, 1988.
273
274
275
Su F, Jia Y,
Icing of insulator string on HV transmission line and the harmfullness, Proc. of the 3 rd International Offshore and Polar Engineering
Conference, Singapore, 1993, pp. 655-662.
276
Arai N,
AC fog withstand test on contaminated insulators by steam fog, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-101, No. 11,
Nov., 1982.
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
Fierro JL,
Effects of pollution conditions on insulators. The case of Mexico, International Symposium on Power System Insulation Co-ordination,
Mexico, Nov. 8-10, 1994.
285
286
Verma MP,
Hchster Ableitstrom als Kenngre fr das Isolierverhalten verschmutzter Isolatoren, ETZ A, Nr. 94, H. 5, 1973, (in German).
287
288
289
1999-09-01
180
290
291
FGH,
Isoliervermgen von Freiluftisolatoren fr Hchstspannungs-Drehstromanlagen unter Fremdschicht-Bedingungen bei
Betriebsspannung, FGH Technischer Bericht Nr. 1-238, 1977, (in German).
292
293
Kawai M,
Flashover tests at project UHV on salt-contaminated insulators, Part II, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-89,
No. 8, Nov./Dec., 1970.
294
Naito K,
Insulator pollution - general aspects, Seminaire sur la pollution des isolements des lignes et postes HT, No.6, Cassa Blanca, March,
1989.
295
296
Paris L,
New trend in Insulation Co-ordination - Application of the new IEC specification, ASEA Journal, Vol. 44, pp 147-154, 1971.
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
Lambeth PJ,
The method of choice of insulators and insulation levels in the UK, private communication, 1978.
307
Lambeth PJ,
The importance of statistical factors on operating stresses for insulators, Cigr 33-84(WG04)15IWD, 1984.
308
309
Kawamura T, Ishii M,
Study on the temperature difference and flashover probability of polluted insulator under natural condition, Trans. of IEEJ, Vol. 96,
No. 1, pp. 7-14, 1976, (in Japanese).
1999-09-01
181
310
Chisholm WA,
North American operating experience: Insulator flashovers in cold conditions, Cigr colloquium SC 33-97, Toronto Ontario Canada,
paper 33-4.3, 1997.
311
312
313
Watanabe Y,
Flashover tests of insulators covered with ice or snow, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-97, No. 5, Sept/Oct.,
1987.
314
Kawamura F, Naito K,
Draft manuscript of Cigr Guidelines for the assessment of the dielectric strength of external insulation, Cigr WG 33.07 document,
April, 1990.
315
316
317
318
319
Shuzi L,
Pollution accumulation performance of insulators under negative DC voltage, Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on properties
and applications of dielectric materials (ICPADM), Xian, China, June 24-29, 1985.
320
Sherif E.M,
Performance and ageing of HVAC and HVDC overhead line insulators, Ph.D Thesis, Technical Report No. 169, 1987, School of
Electrical and Computer Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1987.
321
322
NGK,
Technical Guide, Cat. No. 91R, First revision, 1989.
323
324
325
Wu D, Su Zhiyi S,
The correlation factor between DC and AC pollution levels: Review and Proposal, 10th International Symposium on High Voltage
Engineering (ISH), Montreal, Canada, Proc. Vol. 3, pp. 253-256, Aug 25-29, 1997.
326
327
328
329
1999-09-01
182
330
331
332
333
Paris L,
Robotised Hot-Line Maintenance: Considerations and first experiences, Cigr 32nd session, Paris, Paper no. 22-14, Aug. 28 - Sept. 3,
1988.
334
335
336
Wang R, et al,
Study on the Safety Technique of Hot Washing, IEEE/CSEE Joint Conference on High Voltage Transmission Systems in China, Oct.
17-22, 1987.
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
Almgren B,
Discussion contribution to Gorur R et al 'Protective coatings for...', IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 10, No. 2, April, 1995, pp.
924 -933.
349
350
351
1999-09-01
183
352
Vosloo WL,
End of life failures experienced at a natural ' accelerated' ageing test facility, Cigr colloquium SC 33-95, Harare Zimbabwe, Paper 3.7,
May 29-30, 1995.
353
Su ZY,
Service experience at Gezhouba and Nanqiao 500 kV HVDC converter stations and effect of applying RTV coating, ICPST'94,
October 18-21, 1994, Beijing, China, Vol. 1 pp. 471-473.
354
355
356
Kawai M,
AC flashover test at project UHV on ice-coated insulators, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-80, No. 8, Aug.,
1961.
357
Cherney E,
Flashover performance of artificially contaminated and iced longrod transmission line insulators, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and
Systems, Vol. PAS-99, No. 1, 1980.
358
Sklenicka V, Vokalek J,
Insulators in icing conditions: Selection and measures for reliability increasing, Proc. International workshop on Atmospheric Icing of
Structures, (IWAIS'96), Chicoutimi, Canada, June 3-7, 1996, pp. 72-76.
359
360
Lenk DW,
An examination of the pollution performance of gapped and gapless metal oxide station class surge arresters, IEEE Trans. on Power
Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-103, No. 2, Feb., 1984, pp. 337-344.
361
362
363
364
Sparrow LJ,
Artificial pollution tests for surge arresters- the underlying characteristics of polluted insulators, NG RDC Report, No
HVT/0066/TAN919, 1991.
365
366
367
368
Garasim SI, Kadnikov SN, Redrugina MN, Usov BB, Shur SS, Vokalek J, Sklenika V,
Thermal modes of metal oxide arresters under normal and polluted conditions, calculated and measured, Cigr 34th session, Paris,
Paper no. 33-202, 1992.
369
Verma MP, Petrusch W, Weck KH, Brilka R, Gausmann RD, Hudasch M, Schaper D, Schreiber H, Solbach HB, Weinmann T,
Long term performance of metal oxide arrester at operating voltage, Cigr 34th session, Paris, Paper no. 33-204, 1992.
370
371
1999-09-01
184
372
373
374
375
Swift DA,
Pollution flashover performance of various types of high voltage AC Insulators, 8th International Symposium on High Voltage
Engineering (ISH), Yokohama, Japan, paper 47.15, Aug. 23-27, 1993.
376
377
378
379
Naito K,
Insulators for UHV Transmission, Int. Seminar on EHV/UHV Power Transmission, New Delhi, 1994.
380
EPRI,
Transmission line reference book. HVDC to 600 kV, Book.
381
382
Naito K,
Strength of polluted insulation, Cigr study committee 33 conference, Brazil, May, 1981.
1999-09-01
185
Le CIGR a apport le plus grand soin la ralisation de cette brochure thmatique numrique afin de vous
fournir une information complte et fiable.
Cependant, le CIGR ne pourra en aucun cas tre tenu responsable des prjudices ou dommages de quelque
nature que ce soit pouvant rsulter dune mauvaise utilisation des informations contenues dans cette brochure.
The greatest care has been taken by CIGRE to produce this digital technical brochure so as to provide you with
full and reliable information.
However, CIGRE could in any case be held responsible for any damage resulting from any misuse of the
information contained therein.
Published by CIGRE
21, rue dArtois
FR-75 008 PARIS
Tel : +33 1 53 89 12 90
Fax : +33 1 53 89 12 99
Copyright 2000
All rights of circulation, translation and reproduction reserved for all countries.
No part of this publication may be produced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior
permission of the publisher. This measure will not apply in the case of printing off of this document by any
individual having purchased it for personal purposes.
For any collective use, please contact us at sales-meetings@cigre.org