261269
www.elsevier.comrlocaterjappgeo
CMTEr CSIRO Exploration and Mining, P.O. Box 883, Kenmore, QLD 4069, Australia
Fullagar Geophysics Pty. Ltd., Leel 1, 1 Swann Road, Taringa, QLD 4068, Australia
Abstract
Velocity and absorption tomograms are the two most common forms of presentation of radar tomographic data. However,
mining personnel, geophysicists included, are often unfamiliar with radar velocity and absorption. In this paper, general
formulae are introduced, relating velocity and attenuation coefficient to conductivity and dielectric constant. The formulae
are valid for lossy media as well as high-resistivity materials. The transformation of velocity and absorption to conductivity
and dielectric constant is illustrated via application of the formulae to radar tomograms from the Hellyer zincleadsilver
mine, Tasmania, Australia. The resulting conductivity and dielectric constant tomograms constructed at Hellyer demonstrated the potential of radar tomography to delineate sulphide ore zones. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Electrical conductivity; Cross-hole; Dielectric constant; Mining; Radar; Tomography; Imaging
1. Introduction
Borehole radar can map lithology, structure, and
voids around and between boreholes by measuring
the traveltimes and amplitudes of the electromagnetic EM. waves propagating from a transmitter to
one or more receivers. Broadly speaking, borehole
radar can be operated in two configurations: singlehole reflection or cross-hole transmission. Wellestablished applications of single-hole reflection
borehole radar include cavity detection Owen and
)
Suhler, 1980., fracture mapping within potential nuclear waste repositories Olsson et al., 1992; Stevens
et al., 1994., hydrological investigations Lane et al.,
1994., and stratigraphic mapping within salt mines
Mundry et al., 1983; Eisenburger et al., 1993.. The
principal applications of cross-hole radar to date
have been tunnel detection Lytle et al., 1979., hydrological property mapping Hubbard et al., 1997;
Paprocki and Alumbaugh, 1999., monitoring moisture migration Eppstein and Dougherty, 1998; Peterson et al., 1998; Alumbaugh and Paprocki, 2000.,
mapping hydraulically permeable fractures Wright
and Lane, 1998., and delineating porous zones
Peterson et al., 1999..
Application of borehole radar in non-evaporite
mines is still relatively uncommon, notwithstanding
0926-9851r01r$ - see front matter q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 6 - 9 8 5 1 0 1 . 0 0 0 7 0 - 2
262
v m
a s~
2
2
s2
1q
2v 2
1r2
y1
1r2
1.
2.
v m
b s~
2
2
s2
1q
2v 2
1r2
q1
1r2
3.
The greatest variation in all the physical properties of rocks and minerals is exhibited by the resistivity or conductivity. The resistivity of metallic minerals may be as small as 10y5 V m, for pyrrhotite,
while the resistivity of rocks may be as large as 10 13
V m, for dry salt Telford et al., 1990.. In conductive rocks, EM attenuation is high, phase speed is
reduced, and wavelengths are shorter. Natural variations in the relative dielectric constant are fairly
small, varying between 2 and 80 for most minerals
and rocks, depending on the amount of water present.
Radar velocity, n , can be obtained from inversion
of the first arrival times of a cross-hole radar tomographic survey, while the attenuation coefficient, a ,
can be constructed from inversion of the amplitudes.
Given values of a and n , it follows from Eqs.
1. 3. that the conductivity s or resistivity r . can
be expressed as:
1
2a
ss s
.
4.
r
mn
The corresponding expression for dielectric constant, , is:
m n2
v/
5.
Thus, from measurements of traveltimes and amplitudes of radar waves, we can construct tomograms
for four parameters, viz. phase velocity, attenuation
coefficient, conductivity, and dielectric constant. Resistivity and dielectric constant are usually much
more interpretable for geologists and mining engineers than velocity and absorption. To the best of our
knowledge, the above general conversion formulae
have not been published elsewhere, although approximate expressions for high Q media are frequently
quoted, e.g. Davis and Annan 1989..
263
6.
t s 20log 10 e a l . d l s a a r
s 20log 10 A 0 y a y 20log 10
s a0 y y
r
sin u t sin ur
/
7.
264
265
Fig. 2. Hellyer drill section 10340N, showing the holes used for
radar surveys blue.. Tomographic panel locations are indicated in
orange. Geological interpretation is superimposed in green.
Fig. 3. Raypath geometry for the tomographic radar survey between holes HL800 and HL801 at Hellyer. Numbers at the
transmitter locations in HL800 identify the shot gathers in Fig. 4.
266
267
268
5. Conclusions
References
Acknowledgements
This work was part of AMIRArCMTE Project
P436rMM1, A Application of geophysics to mine
planning and operationsB, sponsored by Aberfoyle
Resources, Acacia Resources, CRA Exploration,
Mount Isa Mines, Normandy Mining, Outokumpu
Mining, and Pasminco Mining. We are grateful to
Greg Marshall, Chris Davies, David Shipp, Bevan
McWilliams and other Aberfoyle staff for their help
during our visit to Hellyer. Likewise, we wish to
acknowledge the professionalism of Christer
Gustafsson and Inge Naslund of Mala Geoscience
269