Part V
Department of
Health and Human
Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29070 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Please allow sufficient time for mailed precedes the section on which you
HUMAN SERVICES comments to be received before the choose to comment.
close of the comment period. Inspection of Public Comments: All
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 3. By hand or courier. If you prefer, comments received before the close of
Services you may deliver (by hand or courier) the comment period are available for
your written comments (one original viewing by the public, including any
42 CFR Part 424 and two copies) before the close of the personally identifiable or confidential
[CMS–1282–P] comment period to one of the following business information that is included in
addresses. If you intend to deliver your a comment. CMS posts all electronic
RIN 0938–AN65 comments to the Baltimore, Maryland comments received before the close of
address, please call telephone number the comment period on its public Web
Medicare Program; Prospective site as soon as possible after they have
(410) 786–9994 in advance to schedule
Payment System and Consolidated been received. Hard copy comments
your arrival with one of our staff
Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for received timely will be available for
members. Room 445–G, Hubert H.
FY 2006 public inspection as they are received,
Humphrey Building, 200 Independence
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201; or generally beginning approximately 3
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD weeks after publication of a document,
ACTION: Proposed rule. 21244–1850. at the headquarters of the Centers for
(Because access to the interior of the Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would HHH Building is not readily available to Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
update the payment rates used under persons without Federal Government Maryland 21244, Monday through
the prospective payment system (PPS) identification, commenters are Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m. to
for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), for encouraged to leave their comments in 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to
fiscal year (FY) 2006, as required by the CMS drop slots located in the main view public comments, phone 1–800–
statute. Annual updates to the PPS rates lobby of the building. A stamp-in clock 743–3951.
are required by section 1888(e) of the is available for persons wishing to retain To assist readers in referencing
Social Security Act (the Act), as a proof of filing by stamping in and sections contained in this document, we
amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, retaining an extra copy of the comments are providing the following Table of
and SCHIP Balanced Budget Refinement being filed.) Contents.
Act of 1999 (BBRA), the Medicare, Comments mailed to the addresses Table of Contents
Medicaid, and State Children’s Health indicated as appropriate for hand or I. Background
Insurance Program (SCHIP) Benefits courier delivery may be delayed and A. Current System for Payment of Skilled
Improvement and Protection Act of received after the comment period. Nursing Facility Services Under Part A
2000 (BIPA), and the Medicare Submission of comments on of the Medicare Program
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and paperwork requirements. You may
B. Requirements of the Balanced Budget
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA), Act of 1997 (the BBA) for Updating the
submit comments on this document’s Prospective Payment System for Skilled
relating to Medicare payments and paperwork requirements by mailing
consolidated billing for SNFs. As part of Nursing Facilities
your comments to the addresses C. The Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP
this year’s annual update, we are provided at the end of the ‘‘Collection Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999
proposing to introduce refinements in of Information Requirements’’ section in (the BBRA)
the Resource Utilization Groups, version this document. D. The Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP
III (RUG–III), the case-mix classification Benefits Improvement and Protection
For information on viewing public
system used under the SNF PPS. Act of 2000 (the BIPA)
comments, see the beginning of the E. The Medicare Prescription Drug,
DATES: To be assured consideration, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
comments must be received at one of Improvement, and Modernization Act of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 2003 (the MMA)
the addresses provided below, no later
Ellen Gay, (410) 786–4528 (for F. Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective
than 5 p.m. on July 12, 2005. Payment—General Overview
information related to the case-mix
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer 1. Payment Provisions—Federal Rates
classification methodology, and for
to file code CMS–1282–P. Because of information related to swing-bed
2. Payment Provisions—Initial Transition
staff and resource limitations, we cannot Period
providers). G. Use of the Skilled Nursing Facility
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
Jeanette Kranacs, (410) 786–9385 (for Market Basket Index
transmission.
information related to the development II. Update of Payment Rates Under the
You may submit comments in one of
of the payment rates, and for Prospective Payment System for Skilled
three ways (no duplicates, please): Nursing Facilities
1. Electronically. You may submit information related to the wage index).
Bill Ullman, (410) 786–5667 (for A. Federal Prospective Payment System
electronic comments on specific issues 1. Costs and Services Covered by the
in this regulation to http:// information related to coverage
Federal Rates
www.cms.hhs.gov/regulations/ requirements, level of care 2. Methodology Used for the Calculation of
ecomments. (Attachments should be in determinations, consolidated billing, the Federal Rates
Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or Excel; and general information). B. Case-Mix Adjustment and Other Clinical
however, we prefer Microsoft Word.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Issues
2. By mail. You may mail written Submitting Comments: We welcome 1. Background
comments (one original and two copies) 2. Case-Mix Refinement Research
comments from the public on all issues
a. Data Sources and Analyses
to the following address ONLY: Centers set forth in this rule to assist us in fully b. Constructing the New RUG–III Groups
for Medicare & Medicaid Services, considering issues and developing c. Development of the Case-Mix Indexes
Department of Health and Human policies. You can assist us by 3. Proposed Refinements to the Case-Mix
Services, Attention: CMS–1282–P, P.O. referencing the file code CMS–1282–P Classification System
Box 8016, Baltimore, MD 21244–8016. and the specific ‘‘issue identifier’’ that 4. Implementation Issues
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29071
5. Assessment Timeframes BIPA Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Medicare payments and consolidated
6. SNF Certifications and Recertifications Benefits Improvement and Protection Act billing for SNFs.
Performed by Nurse Practitioners and of 2000, Pub. L. 106–554
Clinical Nurse Specialists CAH Critical Access Hospital A. Current System for Payment of
7. Concurrent Therapy CBSA Core-Based Statistical Area Skilled Nursing Facility Services Under
C. Wage Index Adjustment to Federal Rates CFR Code of Federal Regulations Part A of the Medicare Program
D. Proposed Area Wage Index CMS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
Section 4432 of the Balanced Budget
1. Proposed Revision of SNF PPS
CMSA Consolidated Metropolitan Act of 1997 (the BBA) amended section
Geographic Classifications
2. Current SNF PPS Labor Market Areas Statistical Area 1888 of the Act to provide for the
Based on MSAs CPT (Physicians’) Current Procedural implementation of a per diem PPS for
3. Core-Based Statistical Areas Terminology SNFs, covering all costs (routine,
4. Proposed Revisions to the SNF PPS DRG Diagnosis Related Group ancillary, and capital-related) of covered
Labor Market Areas FI Fiscal Intermediary SNF services furnished to Medicare
a. New England MSAs FR Federal Register beneficiaries under Part A of the
b. Metropolitan Divisions FY Fiscal Year Medicare program, effective for cost
c. Micropolitan Areas GAO Government Accountability Office reporting periods beginning on or after
5. Implementation of the Revised Labor HCPCS Healthcare Common Procedure
Coding System
July 1, 1998. In this proposed rule, we
Market Areas propose to update the per diem payment
6. Wage Index Data ICD–9–CM International Classification of
Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical rates for SNFs for FY 2006. Major
E. Updates to the Federal Rates
Modification elements of the SNF PPS include:
F. Relationship of RUG–III Classification
IFC Interim Final Rule with Comment • Rates. Per diem Federal rates were
System to Existing Skilled Nursing
Facility Level-of-Care Criteria Period established for urban and rural areas
G. Initial Three-Year Transition Period MDS Minimum Data Set using allowable costs from FY 1995 cost
From Facility Specific to Federal Rates MEDPAR Medicare Provider Analysis and reports. These rates also included an
H. Example of Computation of Adjusted Review File estimate of the cost of services that,
PPS Rates and SNF Payment MIP Medicare Integrity Program before July 1, 1998, had been paid under
MMA Medicare Prescription Drug, Part B but were furnished to Medicare
III. The Skilled Nursing Facility Market
Improvement, and Modernization Act of
Basket Index beneficiaries in a SNF during a Part A
2003, Pub. L. 108–173
A. Use of the Skilled Nursing Facility covered stay. The rates were adjusted
MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area
Market Basket Percentage annually using a SNF market basket
NECMA New England County Metropolitan
B. Market Basket Forecast Error index. Rates were case-mix adjusted
Area
Adjustment using a classification system (Resource
OIG Office of Inspector General
C. Federal Rate Update Factor
IV. Consolidated Billing
OMRA Other Medicare Required Utilization Groups, version III (RUG–
Assessment III)) based on beneficiary assessments
V. Application of the SNF PPS to SNF
PCE Personal Care Expenditures (using the Minimum Data Set (MDS)
Services Furnished by Swing-Bed
PMSA Primary Metropolitan Statistical 2.0). The rates were also adjusted by the
Hospitals Area
VI. Qualifying Three-Day Inpatient Hospital hospital wage index to account for
PPI Producer Price Index
Stay Requirement PPS Prospective Payment System
geographic variation in wages. (In
VII. Provisions of the Proposed Rule PRM Provider Reimbursement Manual section II.C of this preamble, we discuss
VIII. Collection of Information Requirements RAI Resident Assessment Instrument the wage index adjustment in detail.)
IX. Regulatory Impact Analysis RAP Resident Assessment Protocol Correction notices were published in
A. Overall Impact RAVEN Resident Assessment Validation the Federal Register on October 7, 2004
B. Anticipated Effects Entry (69 FR 60158) and on December 30,
C. Accounting Statement RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act, Pub. L. 96– 2004 (69 FR 78445), announcing
D. Alternatives Considered 354
Regulation Text
corrections to several of the wage
RIA Regulatory Impact Analysis factors. Additionally, as noted in
Addendum: Table 8 (Proposed Wage Index RUG Resource Utilization Groups
For Urban Areas Based On Core-Based sections I.C through I.E of this proposed
SCHIP State Children’s Health Insurance
Statistical Area (CBSA) Labor Market Program
rule, section 101 of the BBRA, sections
Areas); Table 9 (Proposed Wage Index SNF Skilled Nursing Facility 311, 312, and 314 of the BIPA, and
For Rural Areas Based On CBSA Labor STM Staff Time Measure section 511 of the MMA also affect the
Market Areas); and Table A UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, payment rate.
(Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)/ Pub. L. 104–4 • Transition. The SNF PPS included
CBSA Crosswalk) an initial 3-year, phased transition that
I. Background blended a facility-specific payment rate
In addition, because of the many
On July 30, 2004, we published a with the Federal case-mix adjusted rate.
terms to which we refer by abbreviation
notice in the Federal Register (69 FR For each cost reporting period after a
in this proposed rule, we are listing
45775) that set forth updates to the facility migrated to the new system, the
these abbreviations and their
payment rates used under the facility-specific portion of the blend
corresponding terms in alphabetical
prospective payment system (PPS) for decreased and the Federal portion
order below:
skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), for increased in 25 percentage point
ADL Activity of Daily Living fiscal year (FY) 2005. Annual updates to increments. For most facilities, the
AHE Average Hourly Earnings the PPS rates are required by section facility-specific rate was based on
ARD Assessment Reference Date 1888(e) of the Social Security Act (the allowable costs from FY 1995; however,
BBA Balanced Budget Act of 1997, Pub. L.
Act), as amended by the Medicare, since the last year of the transition was
105–33
BBRA Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Medicaid, and SCHIP Balanced Budget FY 2001, all facilities were paid at the
Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999, Refinement Act of 1999 (the BBRA) and full Federal rate by the following fiscal
Pub. L. 106–113 the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP year (FY 2002). Therefore, as discussed
BEA (U.S. Department of Commerce) Benefits Improvement and Protection in section I.F.2 of this proposed rule, we
Bureau of Economic Analysis Act of 2000 (the BIPA), relating to are no longer including adjustment
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29072 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
factors related to facility-specific rates B. Requirements of the Balanced Budget aggregate payment for patient days,
for the coming fiscal year. Act of 1997 (the BBA) for Updating the effective with the end of the SNF PPS
• Coverage. The establishment of the Prospective Payment System for Skilled transition period described in section
SNF PPS did not change Medicare’s Nursing Facilities 1888(e)(2)(E) of the Act. In the July 31,
Section 1888(e)(4)(H) of the Act 2001 final rule (66 FR 39562), we made
fundamental requirements for SNF
requires that we publish in the Federal conforming changes to the regulations
coverage. However, because RUG–III
Register: in 42 CFR section 413.114(d), effective
classification is based, in part, on the for services furnished in cost reporting
beneficiary’s need for skilled nursing 1. The unadjusted Federal per diem
rates to be applied to days of covered periods beginning on or after July 1,
care and therapy, we have attempted, 2002, to reflect section 408 of the BBRA.
where possible, to coordinate claims SNF services furnished during the FY.
review procedures involving level of 2. The case-mix classification system D. The Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP
care determinations with the outputs of to be applied with respect to these Benefits Improvement and Protection
beneficiary assessment and RUG–III services during the FY. Act of 2000 (the BIPA)
3. The factors to be applied in making The BIPA also included several
classifying activities. We discuss this
the area wage adjustment with respect provisions that resulted in adjustments
coordination in greater detail in section
to these services. to the PPS for SNFs. These provisions
II.F of this preamble. Moreover, the Part
In the July 30, 1999 final rule (64 FR were described in detail in the final rule
A SNF benefit has not only level of care 41670), we indicated that we would
requirements, but also a set of technical, that we published in the Federal
announce any changes to the guidelines Register on July 31, 2001 (66 FR 39562)
or ‘‘posthospital’’ requirements as well. for Medicare level of care
In section VI of this preamble, we as follows:
determinations related to modifications • Section 203 of the BIPA exempted
discuss one aspect of the technical in the RUG–III classification structure critical access hospital (CAH) swing-
requirement for a qualifying prior (see section II.F of this proposed rule). beds from the SNF PPS; we included
inpatient hospital stay of at least 3 Along with a number of other further information on this provision in
consecutive days, on which we invite revisions discussed later in this Program Memorandum A–01–09
comment. preamble, this proposed rule provides (January 16, 2001).
• Consolidated Billing. The SNF PPS the annual updates to the Federal rates • Section 311 of the BIPA eliminated
includes a consolidated billing as mandated by the Act. the 1 percent reduction in the SNF
provision (described in greater detail in C. The Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP market basket that the statutory update
section IV of this proposed rule) that Balanced Budget Refinement Act of formula had previously specified for FY
requires a SNF to submit consolidated 1999 (the BBRA) 2001, and changed the 1 percent
Medicare bills for almost all of the reduction specified for FYs 2002 and
There were several provisions in the 2003 to a 0.5 percent reduction. As
services that its residents receive during BBRA that resulted in adjustments to
the course of a covered Part A stay. (In discussed in section II.B of this
the SNF PPS. These provisions were proposed rule, this provision also
addition, this provision places the described in detail in the final rule that required us to conduct a study of
Medicare billing responsibility for we published in the Federal Register on alternative case-mix classification
physical, occupational, and speech- July 31, 2000 (65 FR 46770). In systems for the SNF PPS, and to submit
language therapy that the resident particular, section 101 of the BBRA a report to the Congress on the results
receives during a noncovered stay with provided for a temporary 20 percent of the study.
the SNF.) The statute excludes from the increase in the per diem adjusted • Section 312 of the BIPA provided
consolidated billing provision a small payment rates for 15 specified RUG–III for a temporary 16.66 percent increase
list of services—primarily those of groups (SE3, SE2, SE1, SSC, SSB, SSA, in the nursing component of the case-
physicians and certain other types of CC2, CC1, CB2, CB1, CA2, CA1, RHC, mix adjusted Federal rate for services
practitioners—which remain separately RMC, and RMB). Under the law, this furnished on or after April 1, 2001, and
billable to Part B by the outside entity temporary increase remains in effect before October 1, 2002. This section also
that furnishes them. until the later of October 1, 2000, or the required the Government Accountability
• Application of the SNF PPS to SNF implementation of case-mix refinements Office (GAO) to conduct an audit of SNF
in the PPS. A discussion of the case-mix nursing staff ratios and submit a report
services furnished by swing-bed
refinements that we are proposing to to the Congress on whether the
hospitals. Section 1883 of the Act
implement appears in section II.B of this temporary increase in the nursing
permits certain small, rural hospitals to
proposed rule. Section 101 also component should be continued. GAO
enter into a Medicare swing-bed
included a 4 percent across-the-board issued this report (GAO–03–176) in
agreement, under which the hospital increase in the adjusted Federal per November 2002.
can use its beds to provide either acute diem payment rates each year for FYs • Section 313 of the BIPA repealed
or SNF care, as needed. For critical 2001 and 2002, exclusive of the 20 the consolidated billing requirement for
access hospitals (CAHs), Part A pays on percent increase. services (other than physical,
a reasonable cost basis for SNF services We included further information on occupational, and speech-language
furnished under a swing-bed agreement. all of the provisions of the BBRA that therapy) furnished to SNF residents
However, in accordance with section affect the SNF PPS in Program during noncovered stays, effective
1888(e)(7) of the Act, those swing-bed Memoranda A–99–53 and A–99–61 January 1, 2001.
SNF services furnished by non-CAH (December 1999), and Program • Section 314 of the BIPA adjusted
rural hospitals are paid under the SNF Memorandum AB–00–18 (March 2000). the payment rates for all of the 14
PPS, effective with cost reporting In addition, for swing-bed hospitals rehabilitation RUGs (RUC, RUB, RUA,
periods beginning on or after July 1, with more than 49 (but less than 100) RVC, RVB, RVA, RHC, RHB, RHA, RMC,
2002. A more detailed discussion of this beds, section 408 of the BBRA provided RMB, RMA, RLB, and RLA), in order to
provision appears in section V of this for the repeal of certain statutory correct an anomaly under which the
proposed rule. restrictions on length of stay and existing payment rates for three
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29073
particular rehabilitation RUGs—RHC, increase’’ under section 101 of the SNF market basket, and then
RMC, and RMB—were higher than the BBRA (as amended by section 314 of the standardized for the costs of facility
rates for some other, more intensive BIPA). As explained in the MMA differences in case-mix and for
rehabilitation RUGs. Under the BIPA Conference report, this means that if a geographic variations in wages.
adjustment, the temporary increase that resident qualifies for the temporary 128 Providers that received new provider
section 101(a) of the BBRA had applied percent increase in payment under the exemptions from the routine cost limits
to the RHC, RMC, and RMB special AIDS add-on, ‘‘the BBRA were excluded from the database used
rehabilitation RUGs was revised from 20 temporary RUG add-on does not apply to compute the Federal payment rates,
percent to 6.7 percent, and the BIPA in this case * * *.’’ (H.R. Conf. Rep. No. as well as costs related to payments for
adjustment also applied this temporary 108–391 at 662). The AIDS add-on was exceptions to the routine cost limits. In
6.7 percent increase to each of the other also discussed in Transmittal #160 accordance with the formula prescribed
11 rehabilitation RUGs. (Change Request #3291), issued on April in the BBA, we set the Federal rates at
• Section 315 of the BIPA authorized 30, 2004, which is available online at a level equal to the weighted mean of
us to establish a geographic http://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/ freestanding costs plus 50 percent of the
reclassification procedure that is pm_trans/2004/transmittals/ difference between the freestanding
specific to SNFs, but only after comm_date_dsc.asp. mean and weighted mean of all SNF
collecting the data necessary to establish In addition, section 410 of the MMA costs (hospital-based and freestanding)
a SNF wage index that is based on wage contained a provision that affects the combined. We computed and applied
data from nursing homes. consolidated billing requirement, which separately the payment rates for
We included further information on we discuss in section IV of this facilities located in urban and rural
several of these provisions in Program proposed rule. areas. In addition, we adjusted the
Memorandum A–01–08 (January 16, portion of the Federal rate attributable
2001). F. Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective
Payment—General Overview to wage-related costs by a wage index.
E. The Medicare Prescription Drug, The Federal rate also incorporates
The Medicare SNF PPS was adjustments to account for facility case-
Improvement, and Modernization Act of implemented for cost reporting periods
2003 (the MMA) mix, using a classification system that
beginning on or after July 1, 1998. accounts for the relative resource
A provision of the Medicare Under the PPS, we pay SNFs through utilization of different patient types.
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and prospective, case-mix adjusted per diem This classification system, Resource
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) payment rates applicable to all covered Utilization Groups, version III (RUG–
resulted in a further adjustment to the SNF services. These payment rates III), uses beneficiary assessment data
PPS for SNFs. Specifically, section 511 cover all the costs of furnishing covered from the Minimum Data Set (MDS)
of the MMA amended paragraph (12) of skilled nursing services (routine, completed by SNFs to assign
section 1888(e) of the Act to provide for ancillary, and capital-related costs) beneficiaries to one of 44 RUG–III
a temporary 128 percent increase in the other than costs associated with groups. The May 12, 1998 interim final
PPS per diem payment for any SNF approved educational activities. rule (63 FR 26252) included a complete
resident with Acquired Immune Covered SNF services include post- and detailed description of the RUG–III
Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), effective hospital services for which benefits are classification system, and a further
with services furnished on or after provided under Part A and all items and discussion appears in section II.B of this
October 1, 2004. As discussed in services that, before July 1, 1998, had proposed rule.
Transmittal #160 (Change Request been paid under Part B (other than The Federal rates in this proposed
#3291, April 30, 2004), this add-on physician and certain other services rule reflect an update to the rates that
applies to claims with diagnosis code specifically excluded under the BBA) we published for FY 2005 equal to the
042. Like the temporary add-on but furnished to Medicare beneficiaries full change in the SNF market basket
payments created by section 101(a) of in a SNF during a covered Part A stay. index. According to section
the BBRA (as amended by section 314 A complete discussion of these 1888(e)(4)(E)(ii)(IV) of the Act, for FY
of the BIPA), this special AIDS add-on provisions appears in the May 12, 1998 2006, we would update the rate by
was not intended to remain in effect interim final rule (63 FR 26252). adjusting the current rates by the full
indefinitely. As amended by section 511 SNF market basket index.
of the MMA, section 1888(e)(12)(B) of 1. Payment Provisions—Federal Rate
the Act specifies that this temporary The PPS uses per diem Federal 2. Payment Provisions—Initial
increase for patients with AIDS is to payment rates based on mean SNF costs Transition Period
remain in effect only until ‘‘* * * such in a base year updated for inflation to The SNF PPS included an initial,
date as the Secretary certifies that there the first effective period of the PPS. We phased transition from a facility-specific
is an appropriate adjustment in the case developed the Federal payment rates rate (which reflected the individual
mix * * * to compensate for the using allowable costs from hospital- facility’s historical cost experience) to
increased costs associated with [such] based and freestanding SNF cost reports the Federal case-mix adjusted rate. The
residents * * *.’’ As discussed for reporting periods beginning in FY transition extended through the
elsewhere in this proposed rule, we are 1995. The data used in developing the facility’s first three cost reporting
not proposing at this time to address the Federal rates also incorporated an periods under the PPS, up to and
issue of such certification and, estimate of the amounts that would be including the one that began in FY
accordingly, the temporary add-on payable under Part B for covered SNF 2001. Accordingly, starting with cost
payments created by section 511 of the services furnished to individuals during reporting periods beginning in FY 2002,
MMA will remain in effect during FY the course of a covered Part A stay in we base payments entirely on the
2006. a SNF. Federal rates and, as indicated in
The law further provided that the 128 In developing the rates for the initial section II.G of this proposed rule, we no
percent increase in payment under the period, we updated costs to the first longer include adjustment factors
AIDS add-on is to be ‘‘* * * effective year of PPS (the 15-month related to facility-specific rates for the
determined without regard to any period beginning July 1, 1998) using a coming fiscal year.
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29074 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
G. Use of the Skilled Nursing Facility In addition, as explained in the FY 2004 (the most recently available fiscal
Market Basket Index 2004 final rule (68 FR 46058, August 4, year for which there are final data), the
Section 1888(e)(5) of the Act requires 2003) and in section III.B of this estimated increase in the market basket
us to establish a SNF market basket proposed rule, the annual update of the index was 3.0 percentage points, while
index that reflects changes over time in payment rates includes, as appropriate, the actual increase was 3.1 percentage
the prices of an appropriate mix of an adjustment to account for market points. Therefore, the payment rates for
goods and services included in the basket forecast error. This adjustment FY 2006 do not include a forecast error
covered SNF services. The SNF market takes into account the forecast error adjustment, as the difference between
basket index is used to update the from the most recently available fiscal the estimated and actual amounts of
Federal rates on an annual basis. The year for which there are final data, and change does not exceed the 0.25
final rule published on July 31, 2001 (66 is applied whenever the difference percentage point threshold. Table 1
FR 39562) revised and rebased the between the forecasted and actual below shows the forecasted and actual
market basket to reflect 1997 total cost change in the market basket exceeds a market basket amounts for FY 2004.
data. 0.25 percentage point threshold. For FY
TABLE 1.—FY 2004 FORECAST ERROR CORRECTION FOR CMS SNF MARKET BASKET
Forecasted Actual FY FY 2004
Index FY 2004 in- 2004 in- forecast error
crease * crease ** correction ***
II. Update of Payment Rates Under the supplementary medical insurance until the implementation of case-mix
Prospective Payment System for Skilled program) but furnished to Medicare refinements. (A discussion of the case-
Nursing Facilities beneficiaries in a SNF during a Part A mix refinements that we now propose to
A. Federal Prospective Payment System covered stay. (These excluded service implement appears in section II.B of this
categories are discussed in greater detail preamble.)
This proposed rule sets forth a in section V.B.2 of the May 12, 1998
schedule of Federal prospective We used the SNF market basket to
interim final rule (63 FR 26295 through adjust each per diem component of the
payment rates applicable to Medicare 63 FR 26297)).
Part A SNF services beginning October Federal rates forward to reflect cost
1, 2005. The schedule incorporates per 2. Methodology Used for the Calculation increases occurring between the
diem Federal rates that provide Part A of the Federal Rates midpoint of the Federal fiscal year
payment for all costs of services beginning October 1, 2004, and ending
furnished to a beneficiary in a SNF The proposed FY 2006 rates would September 30, 2005, and the midpoint
during a Medicare-covered stay. reflect an update using the full amount of the Federal fiscal year beginning
of the latest market basket index. The October 1, 2005, and ending September
1. Costs and Services Covered by the FY 2006 market basket increase factor is 30, 2006, to which the payment rates
Federal Rates estimated to be 3.0 percent. Consistent apply. In accordance with section
The Federal rates apply to all costs with previous years, this factor may be 1888(e)(4)(E)(ii)(IV) of the Act, the
(routine, ancillary, and capital-related revised in the final rule when later payment rates for FY 2006 are updated
costs) of covered SNF services other forecast data are available. For a by a factor equal to the full market
than costs associated with approved complete description of the multi-step basket index percentage. The rates
educational activities as defined in process, see the May 12, 1998 interim would be further adjusted by a wage
§ 413.85. Under section 1888(e)(2) of the final rule (63 FR 26252). We note that index budget neutrality factor, described
Act, covered SNF services include post- in accordance with section 101(a) of the later in this section. The unadjusted
hospital SNF services for which benefits BBRA and section 314 of the BIPA, the rates are the same under both the
are provided under Part A (the hospital existing, temporary increase in the per existing 44 group RUG classification
insurance program), as well as all items diem adjusted payment rates of 20 system and the proposed RUG–53
and services (other than those services percent for certain specified clinically classification system. Tables 2 and 3
excluded by statute) that, before July 1, complex RUGs (and 6.7 percent for reflect the updated components of the
1998, were paid under Part B (the rehabilitation RUGs) remains in effect unadjusted Federal rates for FY 2006.
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29075
B. Case-Mix Adjustment and Other needs and, by decreasing aggregate existing 44-group structure to well over
Clinical Issues payments to SNFs, negatively affect the 150 groups.
quality of care in nursing homes across The speed with which we conducted
[If you choose to comment on issues in
the country. The research presented in this initial evaluation of the SNF PPS
this section, please include the caption
this proposed rule was initiated as part demonstrated our commitment to
‘‘Case-Mix Adjustment and Other
of a broad-based effort to investigate and ensuring the accuracy and equity of the
Clinical Issues’’ at the beginning of your
respond to access, quality, and payment new payment system, but the evaluation
comments.]
concerns raised by industry, advocates, had important limitations.
Under the BBA, we must publish the Comprehensive SNF PPS data were not
and other stakeholders.
SNF PPS case-mix classification yet available, and the research was
methodology applicable for the next During the course of this effort, CMS
developed tools to monitor and evaluate conducted using 1995–1997 data
Federal FY before August 1 of each year. housed in a large, cross-linked research
As discussed in the following sections, quality of care that are now integral
components of our program oversight database collected from only six states
we propose to begin utilizing a that had implemented a RUG–III
refinement to the RUG–III case-mix activities, including the use of Quality
Indicators, Quality Measures, and payment system prior to July 1998
classification system applicable to the (either through the Federal case-mix
SNF PPS during FY 2006, and we Nursing Home Compare. As discussed
later in this section, the development of demonstration project or for state
specifically solicit comments on the Medicaid payment). These limitations
proposed refinement. these new capabilities has also
positioned us to move forward in new were explained in the proposed rule
1. Background areas. The refinements discussed in this along with our plans to validate the data
section are based on research originally using a national SNF PPS database (65
The SNF PPS replaced the cost-based FR 19193, April 10, 2000).
structure that had been in effect since conducted by Abt Associates (and later
In conducting the validation analyses,
the inception of the Medicare program. validated by the Urban Institute) that
it became clear that the introduction of
Under the SNF PPS, providers have was initiated immediately after the
the SNF PPS and SNF consolidated
more flexibility in the use of Medicare introduction of the SNF PPS in 1999.
billing had caused changes in facility
funds but are responsible not only for In the BBRA, the Congress acted to practice patterns and billing. Some of
furnishing the full range of services to address these access and quality these changes could also have been
Medicare beneficiaries, but for the cost concerns by enacting a series of related to the use of a national database
effectiveness of their purchasing temporary payment adjustments. At and to changing industry practices
decisions. Like the inpatient hospital present, only one of these payment during the early stages of the SNF PPS
PPS, reimbursement for all services, adjustments is still in effect, a 20 implementation. While it was still true
including therapy and other ancillaries percent increase in the per diem that beneficiaries requiring both
such as diagnostic tests, supplies, and adjusted payment rates for 12 complex rehabilitation and extensive medical
pharmacy, were for the first time medical RUG–III groups (SE3, SE2, SE1, services used greater amounts of
included in the SNF Part A ‘‘bundle of SSC, SSB, SSA, CC2, CC1, CB2, CB1, ancillary services, the distribution
services’’ and reimbursed directly to the CA2, and CA1,) and a 6.7 percent patterns for those high-cost ancillaries
SNF rather than to the actual entity increase to all 14 rehabilitation groups. (such as medications and respiratory
furnishing the service. This legislation specified that the therapy) had changed from the patterns
In addition, in response to over a payment adjustments would continue in the six-state data. These results, in
decade of rapidly rising Medicare SNF until the later of: (1) October 1, 2000, or conjunction with the high degree of
payments, the SNF PPS instituted (2) implementation of a refined case-mix intra-group and inter-group variability
controls to adjust for identified classification system under section in ancillary utilization identified in both
overutilization and inflated charge 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of the Act that would the initial and validation analyses,
structures for therapy and other better account for medically complex raised new questions that needed to be
ancillary services. By restructuring the patients. addressed prior to implementing
payment system to reflect a more As we noted in the SNF PPS proposed refinements. For these reasons, we
appropriate expenditure level, there was rule for FY 2001 (65 FR 19190, April 10, decided not to implement such
an aggregate decrease in Medicare 2000), this mandated rate increase was refinements at that time. (See the FY
expenditure levels for the first SNF PPS intended to serve as a temporary, 2001 final rule, 65 FR 46773, July 31,
year. Providers responded to the SNF interim adjustment to the payment rates 2000.)
PPS by restructuring their operations and RUG–III case-mix classification Several months later, the Congress
and practice patterns in an effort to system as published in the final rule of enacted the BIPA. Of the various
adapt to the new payment structure and July 30, 1999, until implementation of provisions of this legislation that
incentives. the case-mix refinements described in addressed the SNF PPS, one directive
These rapid changes in facility the legislation. In that FY 2001 also addressed the future development
practices and Medicare payment also proposed rule, we included a proposal of the SNF PPS. Specifically, section
generated significant concerns that the for an extensive, comprehensive set of 311(e) of the BIPA directed us to
transition to a prospective payment refinements to the existing case-mix conduct a study of the different systems
system would impede access for classification system that collectively for categorizing patients in Medicare
beneficiaries with complex medical would have resulted in expanding the SNFs in a manner that accounts for the
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29076 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
relative resource utilization of different Repository. We matched the claims to and the Rehabilitation Therapy
patient types and to issue a report with the MDS assessments upon which they category. In addition, beneficiaries who
any appropriate recommendations to the were based, yielding approximately 2.7 qualify for Extensive Services and
Congress. million MDS segments, resulting in receive rehabilitation services have
Based upon the broad language every national facility that billed assumed a larger percentage of the
describing the purpose of this study, Medicare for a Part A SNF stay in 1999 Medicare patient population in SNFs in
and the multi-year timeframe provided being represented in the database. We recent years. Therefore, we believe that
for conducting it, we believe that the allocated the non-therapy ancillary costs the RUG–III case-mix classification
Congress clearly intended for this study to the portion of the stay in which they system can provide even more accurate
to address comprehensive changes, by were most likely to have been incurred payment for these beneficiaries if
evaluating a number of different according to a set of decision rules. We refined to create a new RUG–III category
classification systems and considering performed comparative analyses of cost for beneficiaries who qualify for both
the full range of patient types. In and charge data to other existing the Extensive Services and
contrast, since the BBRA specifically administrative data sets in order to Rehabilitation Therapy categories.
ties the duration of its temporary establish the validity of these data. We
b. Constructing the New RUG–III Groups
payment increases to the also performed a further regression
implementation of a case-mix analysis of costs and RUG–III groups. Our research findings showed little or
refinement that would ‘‘better account In addition, we constructed anew the no correlation between the groups
for medically complex patients,’’ we case-mix indexes using our Staff Time within the Extensive Services category
believe that even case-mix refinements Measurement (STM) study data. The (that is, SE1, SE2, SE3) and the level of
of a more incremental nature would STM data were collected in 1990, 1995, rehabilitation services used. For this
meet this more targeted mandate to and 1997, and are described in the May reason, the structure for this new
better account for medically complex 12, 1998 interim final rule (63 FR hierarchy level would closely mirror
patients, and need not await the 26252) that implemented the SNF PPS. that of the existing Rehabilitation
completion of the broader changes Urban then analyzed 270,215 records, Therapy groups. Normally, this
envisioned in the BIPA provision. a 10 percent sample of this updated and methodology would result in the
Moreover, ongoing analysis of the broadened database. As expected, our creation of 14 new groups, the number
SNF PPS showed that providers have analyses again verified that non-therapy that was originally proposed in the FY
adjusted to it, and that the SNF PPS ancillary costs are higher for Medicare 2001 proposed rule. However, for the
rates have generally covered the cost of beneficiaries who classify into the reasons discussed below, the more
care to Medicare beneficiaries. For Extensive Services category than for recent research (Urban 2003) has shown
example, in its March 2005 report, those who classify to other categories. In that a smaller number of RUG–III groups
MedPAC estimated 2005 profit margins these analyses, Urban found that the are sufficient to address the needs of
for freestanding SNFs of 13 percent. In addition of a combined Rehabilitation beneficiaries eligible for a new RUG–III
this environment, it is appropriate to plus Extensive group improved the category, Combined Rehabilitation and
reevaluate the need for maintaining predictive power of the model. These Extensive Care.
results were very similar to the First, we found that several of the
payment adjustments that were always
preliminary Abt results discussed in our groups had very few beneficiaries
intended to be temporary.
FY 2001 proposed rule, and provided assigned to them. In fact, no
2. Case-Mix Refinement Research validation for the preliminary Abt beneficiaries at all were assigned to
analyses (that is, both studies showed several of the lowest ADL score
a. Data Sources and Analyses rehabilitation groups. Second, under the
an increase in the R-square (explanation
In July 2001, we awarded a contract of variance) for non-therapy ancillaries present structure, each Rehabilitation
to the Urban Institute (Urban) for from approximately 4.1 percent in the group is sub-divided into three levels
performance of research to aid us in 44-group model to 8 percent in the 58- based on the activities of daily living
making refinements to the case-mix group model that added nine (ADL) score. The lowest level ADL score
classification system under section Rehabilitation plus Extensive groups). for the Rehabilitation groups is either 4–
1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of the Act and starting Urban then replicated its results with 7 or 4–8, and very few beneficiaries
the case-mix study mandated by section 2001 data using the same analytic currently classify into those groups. No
311(e) of the BIPA. The first phase of the protocols. In this study, Urban found beneficiaries who would qualify for the
contract focused on developing options that the addition of a new RUG–III proposed newly created groups would
for refining the case-mix classification Rehabilitation plus Extensive category classify into such a low ADL score level,
system under section 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of was consistent with the prior research. as a minimum ADL score of seven is
the Act to account for medically Urban used a 163,386 record test sample required for classification into an
complex patients. As part of this and found that the R-square for non- Extensive Care group.
research, Urban updated and broadened therapy ancillaries improved to 9.5 Therefore, it appears that stratification
the database created for the previous percent from the previous result of 4.1 for the lowest level ADL scores for the
refinement analyses by using 1999 percent mentioned above. The analyses proposed new groups would add
matched MDS and SNF claims, and were repeated on a 170,253 record needless complexity and, thus, would
applied the latest cost report data (1998 validation sample with a comparable not be warranted. Instead, we propose to
and 1999) to estimate costs more result; that is, an R-square of 10.3 combine that level with the next higher
accurately for non-therapy ancillary and percent. level, and would no longer use the ADL
other services. While maintaining the general scores lower than 7. Thus, the proposed
We then used this updated and structure of the RUG–III system, we new groups would be stratified only by
broadened database to replicate and found that the most viable way to refine two levels of ADL score. For example,
validate the earlier studies conducted by the system at the present time would be the Rehabilitation High plus Extensive
Abt. The study used Medicare SNF to add groups to the top of the hierarchy Services group would be subdivided
claims data for calendar year 1999 and to capture beneficiaries who qualify for into only two ADL levels, ADL scores of
MDS data from our National MDS both the Extensive Services category 7–12 and 13–18. This left us with only
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29077
one level for Rehabilitation Low plus levels at each of the other sub-categories groups. As a result, we are proposing
Extensive Services and with only two in the new category, for a total of 9 new the addition of 9 new RUG–III groups.
TABLE 3a.—CROSSWALK BETWEEN EXISTING RUG–III REHABILITATION GROUPS AND THE PROPOSED EXTENSIVE PLUS
REHABILITATION GROUPS
New combined exten-
Current rehabilitation sive plus rehabilitation
groups groups
c. Development of the Case-Mix Indexes The nursing weights changed more shift so that the proposed new
We developed the case-mix indexes than the therapy weights, due to the Rehabilitation plus Extensive groups
for the proposed refined RUG–III system redistribution of patients from existing would have the highest relative weights
using the same method used for groups to the newly created proposed and the weights for other RUG–III
calculating the initial SNF PPS case-mix groups. Even though many of the groups would decrease proportionally.
indexes. The original staff time studies beneficiaries who move into one of the The results of applying these methods
conducted in 1990, 1995, and 1997 proposed new groups are from an to index calculation worked well and
resulted in the assignment of resident- existing therapy group, the therapy yielded hierarchically sound indexes for
specific and non-resident specific time weights are affected only slightly. This all of the groups; that is, the indexes for
(minutes) to individual SNF residents. is because the amount of therapy time the highest groups in the hierarchy are
In the initial determination of the case- does not change significantly between higher than for those below it, and this
mix indexes, the residents were the existing groups and the proposed pattern holds throughout the proposed
classified into the 44-group system and new groups. The therapy groups were new category.
the minutes of staff time, nursing, and already narrowly stratified by minutes The nursing indexes in the new
therapy services, where appropriate, of therapy provided. The groups’ category, as well as in the existing
remained associated with those weights would be affected only to the rehabilitation category, are naturally
residents. All of the staff time was extent that the individual beneficiaries more compressed (that is, encompass a
stratified by type of staff providing the who are reclassified into one of the smaller range) than those in the 44-
minutes of time (for example, RN, LPN, proposed new groups have unusually group RUG–III rehabilitation groups.
etc.), and the minutes were weighted for high or low minutes of therapy within The groups within the new
salary. the specific limits. The nursing weights Rehabilitation plus Extensive category
In order to calculate weights for the are more affected by the are more homogeneous than were the
proposed refined system, we used the reclassifications, as those are based on rehabilitation groups of the 44-group
minutes as originally assigned at the a much broader scope of possible system. By removing the most clinically
individual patient level. We reclassified minute values. complex cases and better accounting for
the patients into the proposed 53 groups The therapy weights for the nine them by putting them in rehabilitation
with their associated wage-weighted proposed Rehabilitation Therapy plus groups of their own, both the resulting
minutes of resident-specific and Extensive Services groups were proposed new category and the
nonresident-specific staff time. The next identical to those for the comparable remaining rehabilitation category groups
step was to apply these wage-weighted existing RUG–III rehabilitation therapy would be more homogeneous and,
minutes to the entire sample population groups. Although we are capturing therefore, the relative weights for each
of 26 million days. We multiplied the increased medical/clinical complexity set of groups would exhibit less
population in each group by the wage- with the proposed new groups, the variance.
weighted minutes for each of the staff therapy contribution remains the same Next, we simulated payments using
types. We then derived an average for as for the existing therapy groups. In the existing weights compared to the
the group using the sum of the wage- this way, the Rehabilitation High new weights to ensure that the
weighted minutes for all staff (nursing therapy weight is identical to the new refinement did not result in greater or
and therapy staff minutes were Rehabilitation High plus Extensive lesser aggregate payments. The
calculated separately) xxdivided by the Services sub-category. simulation results showed an almost
total population for that group. The The effect of the increased number of exact match in payments under both
relative weight was then calculated by groups and changes in the case-mix case-mix models. However, the
dividing that average by the average indexes should be distributional. By this proposed new 53-group model did yield
minutes across all of the RUG–III we mean that the relative weights a slight decrease (less than 1 percent) in
groups. assigned to each RUG–III group would aggregate Medicare payments. To
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29078 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
remove this minor variance, we then particular refinement that entailed the RVL Rehabilitation Very High plus
applied a factor of +.02 to calibrate the least amount of added complexity (yet Extensive Services, Low
nursing indexes and re-ran the addressed the medically complex RHX Rehabilitation High plus Extensive
Services, High
simulation. Using this calibration factor patient) involved the creation of several
RHL Rehabilitation High plus Extensive
of +.02, we are able to ensure absolute additional groups that would comprise Services, Low
parity of aggregate payment under the a new, combined Rehabilitation plus RMX Rehabilitation Medium plus Extensive
53-group RUG–III system compared to Extensive Services category. As we Services, High
the 44-group system. noted in that proposed rule: RML Rehabilitation Medium plus Extensive
Finally, we propose to provide for an There are * * * a significant number Services, Low
additional adjustment to the nursing of beneficiaries who would classify into RLX Rehabilitation Low plus Extensive
component of the case-mix weights the Extensive Services category based Services
(which includes non-therapy ancillary on clinical conditions but who, because
We note that, like our current
services) for all RUG–53 groups. As they are also receiving rehabilitation
discussed further in section II.B.3 of this services, classify into one of the proposal, the case-mix refinement that
proposed rule, we have reviewed data Rehabilitation groups instead (due to we considered in our FY 2001 proposed
that show a high degree of variability in the hierarchical logic of the RUG–III rule would have reconfigured the RUGs
non-therapy ancillary utilization, not classification system). These themselves, in a general effort to
only within but across RUG groups. beneficiaries carry with them the same allocate payments more accurately
Therefore, we believe that it is non-therapy ancillary costs associated under the SNF PPS. However, that
appropriate to adjust the case-mix with their complex clinical needs even earlier proposal also included an
weights for all 53 groups (that is, the though they are classified into a RUG– additional element, which was intended
existing 44 RUG–III groups plus the 9 III Rehabilitation category. The high to help ensure more accurate allocation
new groups that we are proposing to costs for beneficiaries in the Extensive of payments specifically with regard to
create in this proposed rule) to better Services category suggest that the non-therapy ancillaries (such as drugs
account for non-therapy ancillary payment rate for Extensive Services and medications, laboratory services,
variability. We would do this under our should be increased. However, supplies and other equipment). For
authority in section 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of increasing the payment rate without example, it proposed moving the non-
the Act to establish an ‘‘appropriate further adjustments could adversely therapy ancillary costs used in
adjustment to account for case mix affect provider incentives to provide establishing the nursing case-mix
* * * *’’ therapy to beneficiaries requiring component of the payment rates to a
In determining the size of this Extensive Services. Therefore, we separate, newly created ‘‘medical
adjustment, we considered not only the expanded the scope of the proposed ancillary’’ component (65 FR 19192,
high degree of variability in non-therapy refinement to include new categories for April 10, 2000). In addition, it suggested
ancillary costs, but also the absence of beneficiaries who qualify for both a number of possible models, both
an outlier policy under the SNF PPS. Extensive Services and a RUG–III weighted and unweighted, for a new
Accordingly, we looked at the outlier Rehabilitation category. non-therapy ancillary index (65 FR
pool established under another post- Further, as our subsequent research 19248ff). As noted in the FY 2001 final
acute care PPS, the one for inpatient (discussed in the previous section) rule, these elements ultimately were not
rehabilitation facility (IRF) services, confirmed, the creation of a proposed adopted when subsequent research
which is set at 3 percent of aggregate new Rehabilitation plus Extensive indicated that their added complexity
expenditures. For the purpose of this category would be a means of would outweigh their increased
refinement, our calculations employed a accounting more accurately for the costs predictive power (65 FR 46774, July 31,
comparable funding level that could be of certain medically complex patients, 2000).
targeted toward payment of non-therapy with the added benefit of a minimal Following the publication of that final
ancillaries. Based on this analysis, we degree of added complexity. We note rule, further research in this area
are proposing an increase to the nursing that, in the past, some support has been revealed a high degree of variability in
component of the case-mix weights (the expressed for making this particular non-therapy ancillary utilization, both
component that includes non-therapy type of modification to the existing case- within and across the various RUG–III
ancillaries) of approximately 8.4 mix classification system. groups. This finding suggested that
percent, which equates to Therefore, we propose to refine the using an index model to address non-
approximately 3 percent of aggregate case-mix classification system under therapy ancillary services might require
expenditures under the SNF PPS. The section 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of the Act by the creation of such a high number of
final RUG–53 nursing indexes are creating a new, combined Rehabilitation groups as to be impractical.
presented in Tables 4a and 5a. Further plus Extensive category, that better In fact, the ability of the SNF PPS to
information regarding this adjustment accounts for medically complex account adequately for non-therapy
can be found in section II.B.3 of this patients, as required in section 101 of ancillary services has been the subject of
proposed rule. the BBRA. Accordingly, the payment attention (and a focus of our research)
rates set forth in this proposed rule since the very inception of the system.
3. Proposed Refinements to the Case- When the Congress originally enacted
Mix Classification System reflect the use of the refined 53-group
RUG classification system that we are the SNF PPS in the BBA, it expressed
[If you choose to comment on issues in proposing. The nine groups that we concern in the accompanying legislative
this section, please include the caption propose to add to the existing RUG–III history ‘‘* * * that under a prospective
‘‘Proposed Refinements to the Case-Mix system are as follows: payment system that includes all
Classification System’’ at the beginning services there may be incentives to
of your comments.] RUX Rehabilitation Ultra High plus decrease the use of ancillary services’
Extensive Services, High
We note that, of the various RUL Rehabilitation Ultra High plus (H. Rep. No. 105–149 at 1318).
individual refinements that were Extensive Services, Low Subsequent legislative initiatives, such
collectively set forth in the FY 2001 RVX Rehabilitation Very High plus as the BBRA mandate to develop case-
proposed rule (65 FR 19194), the Extensive Services, High mix refinements that better account for
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29079
‘‘medically complex’’ patients, and the expensive to treat in terms of non- number of RUG groups is correct in
directive in section 311(d) of the BIPA therapy ancillaries than an individual terms of the overall operation of the
for the GAO to conduct a study of the patient in a more intensive RUG. The SNF PPS, it is still true that this number
adequacy of Medicare’s SNF payment data that we have do not adequately of groups made it extremely difficult to
rates, can all be viewed in the context explain these discrepancies, and the distinguish different levels of non-
of an ongoing Congressional concern in addition of the 9 new RUGs does not therapy ancillary use. The problem may
this area. eliminate them. Our data show that the be less severe in other PPSs that use a
For those reasons, and because the same is true across all 44 RUG–III greater number of groups. For example,
data that we have show wide variability groups. We note that in creating the SNF the IRF PPS was initially structured to
in non-therapy ancillary utilization PPS, the Congress enacted the only PPS have 100 groups, and the inpatient
within each RUG, we believe the legislation in the Medicare program that hospital PPS (IPPS) has over 500
refinement that we now propose should does not establish an outlier policy to diagnosis-related groups. Similarly,
include not only a reconfiguration of the capture high variability in resource there are over 7,000 relative value units
RUGs that addresses the accuracy of utilization. Therefore, in view of the under the resource-based relative value
payment allocation in general terms, but data that we have available to us that scale that determines the payment rates
also an additional element that demonstrates wide disparities in non- for physician and other Part B services.
improves the accuracy of payment therapy ancillary resources consumed By contrast, under this proposed rule,
allocation and accounts more directly by patients both within and across there will be only 53 RUGs. By
for cost variations related to non- RUG–III groups, we believe that it is definition, then, there will be wider
therapy ancillary services. Accordingly, appropriate to adjust the case-mix variation in the resource needs of
as part of our proposed refinement, we weights for all 53 groups (that is, the patients classified into a particular RUG.
propose to increase the case-mix existing 44 RUG–III groups plus the 9 We, therefore, believe that it is
indexes of the existing 44 RUG–III new groups that we are proposing to appropriate to provide for a further
groups (as well as those of the nine create in this proposed rule) to better adjustment to the case-mix index to
proposed new Rehabilitation plus account for non-therapy ancillary compensate for these broad
Extensive Services RUGs), by variability. We would do this by discrepancies.
calculating a percentage increase that exercising our authority under section We note that we are advancing these
would increase aggregate payments. 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of the Act to establish an proposed changes under our authority
As noted previously, we have ‘‘appropriate adjustment to account for in section 101(a) of the BBRA to
reviewed data that show great case mix,’’ in order to maintain access establish case-mix refinements, and that
variability in the ancillary services and quality of care for heavy-care the changes we are hereby proposing
(such as pharmacy) utilized by different patients. will represent the final adjustments
SNF residents who are classified into In determining the size of this made under this authority. Accordingly,
the same RUG–III group. For example, adjustment, we considered the high any future changes to the case-mix
two different patients, both classified degree of variability in non-therapy weights or other components of the SNF
into the SE3 group, might utilize ancillary costs (which was not yet PPS would be accomplished through
markedly different amounts of ancillary known at the time that the BBA and the staff time measures and other validated
services for reasons that are not BBRA were enacted), and the absence of analytical studies.
captured within the current RUG–III an outlier policy under the SNF PPS. As further explained in section II.B.4
classification methodology. Our data Accordingly, we looked at the outlier of this proposed rule, these additional
show that the same is true across all of pool established under another PPS for payments would partially offset the
the existing 44 RUG–III groups. The post-acute care, the inpatient expiration of the temporary add-on
addition of the 9 new groups does not, rehabilitation facility prospective payments that will occur, under the
in itself, compensate for this payment system (IRF PPS), which is set terms of section 101(c) of the BBRA,
discrepancy. Although the SNF at 3 percent of aggregate expenditures. upon the implementation of this
payment system is designed as a For the purpose of this refinement, we proposed case-mix refinement. We
prospective payment system, under calculated the SNF dollars needed to believe that implementing the proposed
which SNFs that treat patients grouped achieve a comparable funding level that case-mix refinement in this manner will
into the same clinical condition should could be targeted towards payment of carry out Congressional intent that the
receive the same base payment, the non-therapy ancillaries. Based on this BBRA’s temporary payment add-ons
variability in ancillary usage that our analysis, we are proposing an increase should not continue indefinitely into
data show makes it difficult to account to the nursing component of the case- the future, while at the same time
fully for non-therapy ancillary costs by mix weights (the component that ensuring that payments under the SNF
adjusting the number of groups. includes non-therapy ancillaries) of PPS continue to support the quality of
Therefore, we believe that it is approximately 8.4 percent, which care furnished in this setting.
appropriate, considering the data that equates to approximately 3 percent of Further, the creation of the proposed
we have available to us, to provide for aggregate expenditures under the SNF new Rehabilitation plus Extensive
an adjustment to each RUG case-mix PPS. Services groups underscores the
weight to account for the variability in Moreover, we believe that this type of importance of ensuring the accuracy of
non-therapy ancillaries, using the adjustment can essentially serve as a patient classifications, particularly with
authority that we have under section proxy for the non-therapy ancillary regard to those categories, such as
1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of the Act. index that we proposed previously as a Extensive Services, that encompass
Additionally, we have found a high means of achieving more appropriate medically complex patients. One way to
degree of variability in non-therapy payment for these services, without the accomplish this could be by ensuring
ancillaries not only within but across potential drawbacks of our earlier that the MDS data used in making such
RUG groups. We have reviewed data proposal in terms of complexity and classifications reflect only those services
showing that an individual patient who addressing variability in utilization. In that are actually furnished during the
is classified into a less intensive RUG fact, while we are confident that the SNF stay itself rather than during the
may nonetheless be significantly more decision to maintain a relatively small preadmission period (for example,
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29080 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
during the prior qualifying hospital that may have an impact on the quality BIPA), this may not necessarily be the
stay). In the July 30, 1999 SNF PPS final of care in this setting. case for the AIDS add-on payments
rule (64 FR 41668 through 41669), we In accordance with section 101 of the under section 511 of the MMA.
noted a public comment that questioned BBRA, implementing these proposed Accordingly, pending further
the appropriateness of the MDS’s 14-day refinements to the case-mix system examination of this issue, we believe
‘‘look-back’’ provision in the specific means that the payment rates set forth that it would be premature at this time
context of the SNF level of care in this proposed rule would no longer for the Secretary to make the required
presumption. While we made no reflect the temporary add-ons to the certification under section
revisions to the look-back provision at Federal rates for specified RUG–III 1888(e)(12)(B) of the Act with respect to
that time, we specifically reserved the groups. We understand that the the unique conditions that pertain to the
right to reconsider the continued use of expiration of the temporary payment care of SNF residents with AIDS. As a
this mechanism in the future. increases, provided for in that result, the 128 percent add-on payments
Subsequent analysis in this area has legislation, results in a significant for SNF residents with AIDS will
focused on the four items contained in reduction in Medicare’s payments remain in effect during FY 2006.
the Special Service section of the MDS between FY 2005 and FY 2006. In fact, The case-mix adjusted payment rates
(P1a—IV medications, suctioning, MedPAC has consistently urged that, are listed separately for urban and rural
tracheostomy care, and use of a until CMS can design a new payment SNFs for the existing 44 group RUG and
ventilator/respirator) that serve to methodology, some or all of the proposed RUG–53 classification systems
classify residents into Extensive Care, temporary add-on payments be retained in Tables 4, 4a, 5, and 5a, with the
the category used for the most medically and allocated towards beneficiaries with corresponding case-mix index values.
complex SNF patients under the RUG– complex medical needs. We also remain committed to our
III classification system. This analysis While this proposed rule sets forth long-term efforts to monitor the RUG-III
indicates that the use of the look-back refinements to the existing case-mix case-mix classification system and to an
provision has caused a significant classification system and RUG–III ongoing effort to increase the accuracy
number of residents to classify to the categories, we are soliciting comments and efficiency of the SNF PPS. A series
Extensive Services category based solely on the economic impact of the resulting of analyses, including the studies used
on services (such as intravenous payment changes, as well as their to develop the refinements discussed
medications) that were furnished potential impact on beneficiaries’ access above, will be discussed in a
exclusively during the period before to quality SNF care. We also invite forthcoming report to the Congress. In
SNF admission. Depending on how comments on possible ways in which this report, we will discuss the findings
such a proposal was formulated, it has the case-mix classification system itself and put forth a series of next steps that
the potential to reduce overall SNF might be further modified to help will provide a framework for future
payments by better aligning them with mitigate the effect of the payment progress. In addition, we have posted
the services actually provided. changes. data describing the research conducted
Therefore, we seek comment on the We note that the expiration of the by ABT and the Urban Institute on our
potential savings and other impacts of BBRA add-on payments would not SNF PPS Web site at http://
revising the MDS Manual instructions to necessarily affect the temporary 128 www.cms.hhs.gov/providers/SNF PPS.
include only those special care percent increase in the per diem Commenters may wish to consult this
treatments and programs (MDS Section adjusted payment rates for SNF material to facilitate a more in depth
P1a) furnished to the resident since residents with AIDS. In enacting that understanding of the proposals
admission or re-admission to the SNF, temporary increase, the Congress cited contained in this document.
similar to the requirement for P1b. We past research indicating that ‘‘* * * Moreover, we would like to take this
anticipate that this change can be AIDS patients have much higher costs opportunity to discuss our thinking
accomplished through an update to the than other patients in the same resource related to broader initiatives in this area
MDS Manual instructions, and will not utilization groups in skilled nursing related to quality of care. Through the
involve system changes at the facility, facilities’’ (H. Rep. No. 108–178, Part 2, Nursing Home Quality Initiative, the
State agency, or Federal level. at 221). This underscored the Congress’ Long Term Care Task Force and other
In addition, we are inviting comments view that AIDS patients are unique forums for collaborative action, CMS
on other policy options that could among SNF residents in that they incur has worked with the SNF industry on
enhance the accuracy of the payment significantly higher care costs than the development of valid quality
system and improve the quality of care residents with other diagnoses, measures, and a variety of quality
provided to Medicare beneficiaries including those who classify to the same improvement efforts focused on nursing
during an SNF stay, without limiting RUG–III group. We believe that even if homes. These efforts and others have
access to post-acute care. For example, a case-mix refinement can meet the resulted in improvements in the quality
we have received recommendations to BBRA criterion of better accounting for of care, particularly in facilities that
decrease or eliminate the grace day the needs of medically complex patients adopt a culture that promotes quality
period specifically for the 5-day PPS generally, this still might not enable the through continuous quality initiatives
MDS assessment. We invite comments Secretary to certify under section (CQI), culture change, and other similar
on this specific recommendation as well 1888(e)(12)(B) of the Act ‘‘* * * that programs. Pay for performance is a tool
as decreasing or eliminating the grace there is an appropriate adjustment in that could provide additional support to
periods associated with all PPS MDS the case mix * * * to compensate for improve the quality of care provided in
assessments. Another example of a the increased costs’’ specifically nursing homes. In this way, we could
possible policy change on which we associated with this particular group of recognize and support the ongoing
invite comment would be whether it patients. Thus, while the efforts of nursing homes to improve
might be appropriate to eliminate the implementation of case-mix refinements quality.
projection of anticipated therapy will trigger the expiration of the 20 Designing Pay for Performance
services during the 5-day PPS percent and 6.7 percent add-on programs for the SNF setting presents
assessment. We invite comments on payments under section 101(a) of the some significant issues. While Medicare
these and other existing SNF policies BBRA (as amended by section 314 of the beneficiaries are the primary users of
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29081
SNF services, only a small percentage of compare clinical data across different acute care. We welcome comments on
these beneficiaries (that is, sites of service. these and other approaches.
approximately 10 percent) receive In fact, in the long run, our ability to 4. Implementation Issues
services that are reimbursed under compare clinical data across care
Medicare Part A. The majority of settings is one of the benefits that will [If you choose to comment on issues in
beneficiaries receive services that are be realized as a basic component of our this section, please include the caption
reimbursed by multiple payers, interest in the use of standardized ‘‘Implementation Issues’’ at the
including Medicare Part B, Medicaid, electronic health records (EHRs) and beginning of your comments.]
and private insurance, and that are other steps to promote continuity of care As noted previously in this proposed
delivered within different parts of a across all settings, including nursing rule, the temporary add-on payments
nursing facility. Therefore, it is not homes. It is also important to recognize enacted by section 101(a) of the BBRA
enough to change practice patterns in the complexity of the effort, not only in expire upon the implementation of case-
just a part of a nursing home (that is, developing an integrated assessment mix refinements. Section 101(c) of the
skilled units), as Medicare beneficiaries tool that is designed using health BBRA specifies that the actual date on
can be placed anywhere in the facility. information standards, but in examining which these temporary add-on
In addition, the focus of the nursing, the various provider-centric prospective payments are to expire is ‘‘the later of—
rehabilitative, and medical payment methodologies and considering (1) October 1, 2000; or (2) the date on
interventions will typically vary for patient-centric payment approaches that which the Secretary implements a
persons who are receiving short-term are based on patient characteristics and refined case mix classification system
skilled nursing facility services versus outcomes. MedPAC has recently taken a under section 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of the
those persons who are long-term preliminary look at the challenges in Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
residents in nursing facilities. improving the coordination of our post- 1395yy(e)(4)(G)(i)) to better account for
For these reasons, quality measures acute care payment methods, and medically complex patients’’. Section
must be carefully constructed; that is, suggested that it may be appropriate to 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of the Act, in turn,
broad-based and designed to effect explore additional options for specifies that the Secretary shall provide
change across the mix of patients reimbursing post-acute services. We for an ‘‘appropriate adjustment’’ to
residing in the facility. Similarly, we agree that CMS, in conjunction with account for case mix.
need to consider how to design effective While this proposed rule sets forth
MedPAC and other stakeholders, should
incentives; that is, superior performance proposed updates to the SNF PPS
consider a full range of options in
measured against pre-established payment rates that are to take effect as
analyzing our post-acute care payment
benchmarks and/or performance of October 1, 2005, we recognize that
methods, including the SNF PPS.
improvements. adopting the proposed refinements to
In addition, while our efforts to We also want to encourage the case-mix classification system will
develop the various post-acute care incremental changes that will help us likely entail significant changes for
PPSs (including the SNF PPS) have build toward these longer-term SNFs as well as for Medicare
generated substantial improvements objectives. For example, several contractors. Therefore, in order to allow
over the preexisting cost-based systems, automated medical record tools are now sufficient time for preparation and to
each of these individual systems was available that could allow hospitals and ease the transition to the proposed
developed independently. As a result, SNFs to coordinate discharge planning refinements, we believe that it would be
we have focused on phases of a patient’s procedures more closely. These tools appropriate under section
illness as defined by a specific site of can be used to ensure communication of 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of the Act to make a
service, rather than on the entirety of a standardized data set that can also be case-mix adjustment that reflects the
the post-acute episode from the used to establish a comprehensive SNF implementation of the refinements
standpoint of the patient rather than the care plan. Improved communications described below.
facility. As the various provider types may reduce the incidence of potentially Accordingly, from October 1, 2005,
(such as SNFs and inpatient avoidable re-hospitalizations and other through December 31, 2005, we propose
rehabilitation facilities (IRFs)) provide negative effects on quality of care that to make payment based entirely on the
similar types of services in some cases, occur when patients are transferred to existing 44-group RUG–III classification
and as the opportunities to provide SNFs without a full understanding of system. Beginning on January 1, 2006,
similar services in different settings their care needs. CMS is looking at ways we propose to make payment based
increase, we need to investigate a more that Medicare providers can use these entirely on the proposed new RUG–53
coordinated approach to payment and tools to generate timely data to support classification system. This means that
delivery of post-acute services that continuity across settings. We are also under the terms of section 101(c) of the
focuses on the overall post-acute interested in comments on payment BBRA, the temporary add-on payments
episode. reforms that could promote and reward for certain designated RUG–III groups
This could entail a strategy of such continuity, and avoid the medical will expire as of January 1, 2006. We
developing payment policy that is as complications and additional costs note that the resulting reduction in
neutral as possible regarding provider associated with re-hospitalization. payment will be partially offset by the
and patient decisions about the use of Some of the ideas discussed here may increase in the RUG case-mix indexes,
particular post-acute services. That is, exceed CMS’s current statutory as explained previously in section II.B.3
Medicare should provide payments authority. However, we believe that it is of this proposed rule. We invite
sufficient to ensure that beneficiaries useful to encourage discussion of a comments on all aspects of
receive high quality care in the most broad range of ideas for debate of the implementing the proposed case-mix
appropriate setting, so that admissions relative advantages and disadvantages of refinements, including our plan to defer
and any transfers between settings occur the various policies affecting this implementation until January 1, 2006.
only when consistent with good care, important component of the health care Further, along with those matters
rather than to generate additional sector, to ensure that our administrative relating specifically to the case-mix
revenues. In order to accomplish this actions provide maximum support for classification system, we have identified
objective, we need to collect and further steps toward higher quality post- a number of broader clinical issues that
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29082 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
we are also taking this opportunity to with a physician may sign the required services as well. We believe that, even
address: certification (or recertification) for a in the absence of a direct employment
beneficiary’s SNF stay. (Section relationship, an SNF that has an NP or
5. Assessment Timeframes
1819(b)(6)(A) of the Act further specifies CNS perform these general nursing
We would like to take this that the medical care of each SNF services is essentially utilizing the NP or
opportunity to clarify existing resident must be under the supervision CNS in the same manner as it would an
requirements regarding completion of of a physician (see also the regulations employee, so that an indirect
Other Medicare Required Assessments at 42 CFR 483.40(a)(1)).) This provision employment relationship can be
(OMRAs) for beneficiaries reimbursed that bars NPs and CNSs from having a considered to exist. Accordingly, in
under the SNF PPS. An OMRA is due direct or indirect employment situations where there is no direct
8 to 10 days after the cessation of all relationship with a SNF in order to sign employment relationship between the
therapy (occupational and physical a certification or recertification of the SNF and the NP or CNS, we propose
therapies and speech-language need for care is very restrictive. By that an indirect employment
pathology services) in all situations contrast, a similar statutory limitation relationship exists whenever the NP or
where the beneficiary was assigned a (see section 1919(b)(6)(A) of the Act) on CNS not only performs delegated
rehabilitation RUG–III group on the the delegation of physician tasks in physician tasks, but also provides
previous assessment. Medicaid nursing facilities only bars nursing services under the regulations at
The ‘‘last day of therapy’’ is the last NPs, CNSs, and physician assistants 42 CFR 409.21, which include such
day on which a therapy service was (PAs) from performing delegated tasks if services within the scope of coverage
furnished. It is not the day the discharge they are actually employed by the under the Part A SNF benefit. We
order for therapy was received and/or facility. believe that this criterion is appropriate,
written on the resident’s medical record. Following the enactment of this because there would be a potential
Therefore, when the last day that legislation, we received numerous conflict of interest if an NP or CNS who
therapy was provided falls on a Friday, inquiries asking us to define ‘‘direct’’ is engaged in furnishing covered Part A
the Saturday and Sunday directly and ‘‘indirect’’ employment nursing services to an SNF’s resident
following are counted as days 1 and 2, relationships in greater detail. In the were also permitted to certify as to that
respectively, toward the total 8 to 10 July 26, 1995 final rule (60 FR 38268), resident’s need for Part A SNF care. We
days of the OMRA window. The same we stated that factors indicating invite comments on the effects of
principles apply when the ‘‘midnight whether a NP or CNS has a direct or establishing our proposed distinction in
rule’’ is initiated during a beneficiary’s indirect employment relationship this context.
Part A SNF stay. include, but are not limited to the
In addition, in the relatively following: 7. Concurrent Therapy
uncommon situations where a resident • The facility or someone on its
starts a leave of absence after the [If you choose to comment on issues in
medical staff has the authority to hire or
therapy services have been discontinued this section, please include the caption
fire the nurse;
and is out of the facility for part of the • The facility or someone on its ‘‘Concurrent Therapy’’ at the beginning
8 to 10 day period during which the medical staff furnishes the equipment or of your comments.]
OMRA must be completed, those place to work, sets the hours, and pays The SNF PPS proposed rule for FY
therapeutic leave days are to be counted the nurse by the hour, week, or month; 2002 (66 FR 23991, May 10, 2001)
when determining the OMRA due date. • The facility or someone on its included a discussion of concurrent
While this information is not new, we medical staff restricts the nurse’s ability therapy, a practice also known as
determined that it would be beneficial to work for someone else or provides ‘‘dovetailing.’’ In that discussion, we
to clarify and remind the public of these training and requires the nurse to follow noted that this practice involves a single
specific issues involving the OMRA. instructions. professional therapist treating more than
We note that the longstanding one Medicare beneficiary at a time—in
6. SNF Certifications and common law test, as set forth in some cases, many more than one
Recertifications Performed by Nurse regulations at 20 CFR 404.1005, individual at a time. In contrast to group
Practitioners and Clinical Nurse 404.1007, and 404.1009, continues to therapy, in which all participants are
Specialists determine the presence of a direct working on some common skill
[If you choose to comment on issues in employment relationship for the development, each beneficiary who
this section, please include the caption purposes of this provision. However, receives concurrent therapy likely is not
‘‘SNF Certifications and Recertifications numerous inquiries from providers and receiving services that relate to those
Performed by Nurse Practitioners and other stakeholders continue to request needed by any of the other participants.
Clinical Nurse Specialists’’ at the that we specifically clarify the Although the care that each beneficiary
beginning of your comments.] definition of an ‘‘indirect’’ employment receives may be prescribed in his or her
We are taking this opportunity to relationship in those situations where individual plan of treatment, it may not
clarify the requirement for physician no direct employment relationship conform to Medicare coverage
signature on the certification and exists. Accordingly, we propose to guidelines; that is, the therapy is not
recertification of the need for SNF care revise the regulations at § 424.20(e)(2) to being provided individually, and it is
(§ 424.20(e)(2)) as it relates to nurse identify the existence of an indirect unlikely that the services being
practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse employment relationship in terms of the delivered are at the complex skill level
specialists (CNSs). In section 6028 of the type of services that the practitioner required for coverage by Medicare. We
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of performs in the SNF. We note that NPs expressed particular concern over
1989, the Congress amended section and CNSs who are employed by SNFs instances in which facility management
1814(a)(2) of the Act. As amended, the not only perform the types of delegated might inappropriately attempt to
Act specifies that an NP or CNS ‘‘* * * physician tasks that are permitted under increase productivity by coercing a
who does not have a direct or indirect the long-term care facility requirements therapist, against his or her own
employment relationship’’ with the for participation at 42 CFR 483.40(e), professional judgment, to perform
facility but is working in collaboration but typically perform general nursing concurrent therapy.
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29083
In the SNF PPS final rule for FY 2002 changes at that time, we reiterated that We propose to establish an effective
(66 FR 39567, July 31, 2001), we noted it is inappropriate for a facility to date of January 1, 2006, as the beginning
that most of the public comments that require, as a condition of employment, date for the use of the proposed case-
we received on this discussion urged us that a therapist agree to treat more than mix refinements. Accordingly, from
to continue to recognize concurrent one beneficiary at a time in situations October 1, 2005, through December 31,
therapy as skilled therapy, and where providing treatment in such a 2005, we propose to make payment
contended that therapists are treating manner would compromise the based entirely on the existing 44-group
more than one beneficiary concurrently therapist’s professional judgment. We RUG–III classification system. Tables 4,
only when appropriate. However, others also noted that we might revisit this 5, 6, and 7 reflect the corresponding rate
indicated that our concerns regarding issue in the future should the need to do information for the existing 44 group
concurrent therapy were, in fact, so arise. RUG–III classification system to be used
warranted. They reported that since the during this time.
implementation of the SNF PPS, Since that time, we have continued to Beginning on January 1, 2006, we
professional therapists are encountering encounter reports of facilities that propose to make payment based on the
increased pressure to be more attempt to override the therapist’s proposed new RUG–53 classification
productive than they have in the past, professional judgment and have system (and, thus, would not include
including the need to see more than one concurrent therapy performed in the the add-on payments). Tables 4a, 5a, 6a,
patient at a time, and performing absence of valid clinical considerations. and 7a reflect the corresponding rate
documentation and collaboration with Accordingly, we believe it is information for the proposed RUG–53
other members of the care team as non- appropriate at this time to consider once classification system.
reimbursed time. In response to the again whether there is a need to issue Tables 4 and 5 reflect the updated
comments, we acknowledged that additional guidelines to preclude the SNF Federal rates for FY 2006 for the
concurrent therapy can have a inappropriate provision of concurrent existing 44 group RUG–III classification
legitimate place in the spectrum of care therapy. We invite comment on the system. Tables 4a and 5a reflect the
options available to therapists treating most effective way to prevent the abuse updated SNF Federal rates for FY 2006
Medicare beneficiaries, as long as its use of this practice, and to ensure that for the RUG–53 classification system.
is driven by valid clinical concurrent therapy is performed only in The first nine groups listed in the tables
considerations. However, while we those instances where it is clinically are for new Rehabilitation plus
declined to make any specific policy justified. Extensive Services groups.
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29084 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29085
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29086 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
C. Wage Index Adjustment to Federal labor-related relative importance is each cost category by dividing the FY
Rates calculated from the SNF market basket, 2006 price index level for that cost
Section 1888(e)(4)(G)(ii) of the Act and approximates the labor-related category by the total market basket price
requires that we adjust the Federal rates portion of the total costs after taking index level. Third, we determine the FY
to account for differences in area wage into account historical and projected 2006 relative importance for each cost
levels, using a wage index that we find price changes between the base year and category by multiplying this ratio by the
appropriate. Since the inception of a FY 2006. The price proxies that move base year (FY 1997) weight. Finally, we
PPS for SNFs, we have used hospital the different cost categories in the sum the FY 2006 relative importance for
wage data in developing a wage index market basket do not necessarily change each of the labor-related cost categories
to be applied to SNFs. We propose to at the same rate, and the relative (wages and salaries, employee benefits,
continue that practice for FY 2006, as importance captures these changes. nonmedical professional fees, labor-
we continue to believe that in the Accordingly, the relative importance intensive services, and capital-related
absence of SNF-specific wage data, figure more closely reflects the cost expenses) to produce the FY 2006 labor-
using the hospital wage index is share weights for FY 2006 than the base related relative importance. Tables 6
appropriate and reasonable for the SNF year weights from the SNF market and 7 show the Federal rates by labor-
PPS. basket. related and non-labor-related
The wage index adjustment would be We calculate the labor-related relative components for the existing 44 group
applied to the proposed labor-related importance for FY 2006 in four steps. RUG classification system. Tables 6a
portion of the Federal rate, which is First, we compute the FY 2006 price and 7a show the Federal rates by labor-
76.087 percent of the total rate. This index level for the total market basket related and non-labor-related
percentage reflects the labor-related and each cost category of the market components for the proposed RUG–53
relative importance for FY 2006. The basket. Second, we calculate a ratio for classification system.
TABLE 6.—RUG–44, CASE-MIX ADJUSTED FEDERAL RATES FOR URBAN SNFS BY LABOR AND NON-LABOR COMPONENT
Non-labor
RUG III category Total rate Labor portion portion
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29087
TABLE 6.—RUG–44, CASE-MIX ADJUSTED FEDERAL RATES FOR URBAN SNFS BY LABOR AND NON-LABOR
COMPONENT—Continued
Non-labor
RUG III category Total rate Labor portion portion
TABLE 6A.—RUG–53, CASE-MIX ADJUSTED FEDERAL RATES FOR URBAN SNFS BY LABOR AND NON-LABOR COMPONENT
Non-labor
RUG 53 category Total rate Labor portion portion
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29088 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 6A.—RUG–53, CASE-MIX ADJUSTED FEDERAL RATES FOR URBAN SNFS BY LABOR AND NON-LABOR
COMPONENT—Continued
Non-labor
RUG 53 category Total rate Labor portion portion
TABLE 7.—RUG–44, CASE-MIX ADJUSTED FEDERAL RATES FOR RURAL SNFS BY LABOR AND NON-LABOR COMPONENT
Non-labor
RUG III category Total rate Labor portion portion
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29089
TABLE 7.—RUG–44, CASE-MIX ADJUSTED FEDERAL RATES FOR RURAL SNFS BY LABOR AND NON-LABOR
COMPONENT—Continued
Non-labor
RUG III category Total rate Labor portion portion
TABLE 7A.—RUG–53 CASE-MIX ADJUSTED FEDERAL RATES FOR RURAL SNFS BY LABOR AND NON-LABOR COMPONENT
Non-labor
RUG–53 category Total rate Labor portion portion
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29090 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 7A.—RUG–53 CASE-MIX ADJUSTED FEDERAL RATES FOR RURAL SNFS BY LABOR AND NON-LABOR
COMPONENT—Continued
Non-labor
RUG–53 category Total rate Labor portion portion
Section 1888(e)(4)(G)(ii) of the Act www.whitehouse.gov/omb/bulletins/ urban area of a State may not be less
also requires that we apply this wage b03–04.html. At that time, we did not than the area wage index applicable to
index in a manner that does not result propose to apply these new definitions hospitals located in rural areas in the
in aggregate payments that are greater or known as the Core-Based Statistical State. Consistent with past SNF policy,
lesser than would otherwise be made in Areas (CBSAs). After further analysis, we treat this provision, commonly
the absence of the wage adjustment. For we are proposing to use the OMB- referred to as the ‘‘rural floor,’’ as
FY 2006 (Federal rates effective October revised definitions to adjust the FY 2006 applicable to acute inpatient hospitals
1, 2005), we would apply the most SNF PPS payment rates. The Hospital and not SNFs. Therefore, the hospital
recent wage index using the hospital Inpatient PPS (IPPS) is applying these wage index used for SNFs is commonly
wage data, and apply an adjustment to revised definitions as discussed in the referred to as ‘‘pre-floor,’’ indicating that
fulfill the budget neutrality requirement. August 11, 2004 IPPS final rule (69 FR the ‘‘rural floor’’ provision is not
This requirement would be met by 49207). applied.
multiplying each of the components of The current SNF PPS labor market
1. Proposed Revision of SNF PPS areas are defined based on the
the unadjusted Federal rates by a factor
Geographic Classifications definitions of MSAs, Primary MSAs
equal to the ratio of the volume
weighted mean wage adjustment factor As discussed in the May 12, 1998 SNF (PMSAs), and NECMAs issued by the
(using the wage index from the previous PPS interim final rule, which OMB (commonly referred to collectively
year) to the volume weighted mean implemented the SNF PPS (63 FR as ‘‘MSAs’’). These MSA definitions,
wage adjustment factor, using the wage 26252), in establishing an adjustment which are discussed in greater detail
index for the FY beginning October 1, for area wage levels under below, are currently used under the SNF
2005. The same volume weights are § 413.337(a)(ii), the labor-related portion PPS and other prospective payment
used in both the numerator and of a SNF’s Federal prospective payment systems such as the long-term care
denominator and will be derived from is adjusted by using an appropriate hospital PPS (LTCH PPS), the inpatient
1997 Medicare Provider Analysis and wage index. As set forth in psychiatric facility PPS (IPF PPS), the
Review File (MEDPAR) data. The wage § 413.337(a)(ii), a SNF’s wage index is home health agency PPS (HHA PPS),
adjustment factor used in this determined based on the location of the and the inpatient rehabilitation facility
calculation is defined as the labor share SNF in an urban or rural area as defined PPS (IRF PPS). In the August 11, 2004
of the rate component multiplied by the in § 412.62(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii), IPPS final rule (67 FR 49026 through
wage index plus the non-labor share. respectively. In general, an urban area is 49034), revised labor market area
The proposed budget neutrality factor defined as a Metropolitan Statistical definitions were adopted under
for this year is 1.0011. However, this Area (MSA) or New England County § 412.64(b), which were effective
may change in the final rule. In order to Metropolitan Area (NECMA) as defined October 1, 2004 for acute care hospitals.
give the public a sense of the magnitude by OMB. Under § 412.62(f)(1)(iii), a The new standards, CBSAs, were
of this adjustment, last year’s factor was rural area is defined as any area outside announced by OMB in late 2000 and are
1.0011. of an urban area. The urban and rural discussed in greater detail below.
area geographic classifications defined
D. Proposed Area Wage Index in § 412.62(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii), 2. Current SNF PPS Labor Market Areas
Section 1888(e)(4)(G)(ii) of the Act respectively, were used under the IPPS Based on MSAs
requires that we adjust the Federal rates from FYs 1985 through 2004 As noted above, we currently define
to account for differences in area wage (§ 412.63(b)), and have been used under labor market areas based on the
levels, using a wage index that we find the SNF PPS since it was implemented definitions of MSAs, PMSAs, and
appropriate. Since the inception of a for cost reporting periods beginning on NECMAs issued by the OMB. The OMB
PPS for SNFs, we have used hospital or after July 1, 1998. The wage index also designates Consolidated MSAs
wage data in developing a wage index used for the SNF PPS is calculated using (CMSAs). A CMSA is a metropolitan
to be applied to SNFs. As noted the IPPS wage index data on the basis area with a population of one million or
previously, we are proposing to of the labor market area in which the more, comprising two or more PMSAs
continue that practice for FY 2006. acute care hospital is located, but (identified by their separate economic
In our July 30, 2004 update notice, we without taking into account geographic and social character). For purposes of
acknowledged that on June 6, 2003, the reclassification under sections the wage index, we use the PMSAs
Office of Management and Budget 1886(d)(8) and (d)(10) of the Act. The rather than CMSAs because they allow
(OMB) issued ‘‘OMB Bulletin No.03– applicable SNF wage index value is a more precise breakdown of labor costs.
04,’’ which announced revised assigned to a SNF on the basis of the If a metropolitan area is not designated
definitions for Metropolitan Statistical labor market area in which the SNF is as part of a PMSA, we use the
Areas, and new definitions of geographically located. applicable MSA.
Micropolitan Statistical Areas and Section 4410 of the BBA provides that These different designations use
Combined Statistical Areas. A copy of for the purposes of section 1886(d)(3)(E) counties as the building blocks upon
the Bulletin may be obtained at the of the Act, the area wage index which they are based. Therefore,
following Internet address: http:// applicable to hospitals located in an providers are assigned to either an MSA,
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29091
PMSA, or NECMA based on whether the The new CBSA designations about the methodology applied in the
county in which the provider is located recognize 49 new (urban) MSAs and 565 August 11, 2004 IPPS final rule (69 FR
is part of that area. All of the counties new Micropolitan Areas, and revise the 49207). We believe that sufficient time
in a State outside a designated MSA, composition of many of the existing has now elapsed for interested parties to
PMSA, or NECMA are designated as (urban) MSAs. There are 1,090 counties consider and react to the new OMB
rural. For the purposes of calculating in MSAs under the new CBSA definitions and, accordingly, we are
the wage index, we combine all of the designations (previously, there were 848 now proposing to make the changes
counties in a State outside a designated counties in MSAs). Of these 1,090 discussed below.
MSA, PMSA, or NECMA together to counties, 737 are in the same MSA as We have continued to use MSAs to
calculate the statewide rural wage index they were before the change in define labor market areas for purposes
for each State. designations, 65 are in a different MSA, of the wage index. For the SNF
and 288 were not previously designated prospective payment system, the statute
3. Core-Based Statistical Areas provides the Secretary with broad
to any MSA. There are 674 counties in
The OMB reviews its Metropolitan Micropolitan Areas. Of these, 41 were authority to use an ‘‘appropriate wage
Area (MA) definitions preceding each previously in an MSA, while 633 were index as determined by the Secretary.’’
decennial census. As discussed in the not previously designated to an MSA. We believe MSAs are a reasonable and
August 11, 2004 IPPS final rule (69 FR There are five counties that previously appropriate proxy for developing
49207), in the fall of 1998, the OMB were designated to an MSA but are no geographic areas for purposes of
chartered the Metropolitan Area longer designated to either an MSA or adjusting for wage differences in SNF
Standards Review Committee to a new Micropolitan Area: Carter County, PPS and for many of the same reasons
examine the MA standards and develop KY; St. James Parish, LA; Kane County, stated in the various IPPS rules over the
recommendations for possible changes UT; Culpepper County, VA; and King years where this issue has been
to those standards. Three notices related George County, VA. For a more detailed exhaustively examined. We also note
to the review of the standards, providing discussion of the conceptual basis of the that MSAs are used to define labor
an opportunity for public comment on new CBSAs, refer to the August 11, 2004 market areas for purposes of the wage
the recommendations of the Committee, IPPS final rule (67 FR 49026 through index for many of the other Medicare
were published in the Federal Register 49034). payment systems (for example, IRF PPS,
on the following dates: December 21, HHA PPS, and IPF PPS).
4. Proposed Revisions to the SNF PPS First, historically, Medicare
1998 (63 FR 70526); October 20, 1999
Labor Market Areas prospective payment systems have
(64 FR 56628); and August 22, 2000 (65
FR 51060). [If you choose to comment on issues in utilized MA definitions developed by
this section, please include the caption OMB. For example, in discussing the
In the December 27, 2000 Federal adoption of the MSA designation for the
Register (65 FR 82228 through 82238), ‘‘Proposed Revisions to the SNF PPS
Labor Market Areas’’ at the beginning of IPPS area labor adjustment, the IPPS
the OMB announced its new standards. proposed rule for FY 1985 (49 FR 27426,
In that notice, the OMB defines a Core- your comments.]
July 3, 1984) stated:
Based Statistical Area (CBSA), In its June 6, 2003 announcement, the [i]n administering a national payment
beginning in 2003, as ‘‘a geographic OMB cautioned that these new system, we must have a national
entity associated with at least one core definitions ‘‘should not be used to classification system built on clear,
of 10,000 or more population, plus develop and implement Federal, State, objective standards. Otherwise the
adjacent territory that has a high degree and local nonstatistical programs and program becomes increasingly difficult
of social and economic integration with policies without full consideration of to administer because the distinction
the core as measured by commuting the effects of using these definitions for between rural and urban hospitals is
ties.’’ The standards designate and such purposes. These areas should not blurred. We believe that the MSA
define two categories of CBSAs: MSAs serve as a general-purpose geographic system is the only one that currently
and Micropolitan Statistical Areas (65 framework for nonstatistical activities, meets the requirements for use as a
FR 82235). and they may or may not be suitable for classification system in a national
According to the OMB, MSAs are use in program funding formulas.’’ payment program. The MSA
based on urbanized areas of 50,000 or In the SNF PPS update notice for FY classification system is a statistical
more population, and Micropolitan 2005 (69 FR 45786, July 30, 2004), we standard developed for use by Federal
Statistical Areas (referred to in this noted that the recently-published IPPS agencies in the production, analysis,
discussion as Micropolitan Areas) are proposed rule for FY 2005 had and publication of data on metropolitan
based on urban clusters of at least discussed some of the problems and areas. The standards have been
10,000 population, but less than 50,000 concerns associated with using these developed with the aim of producing
population. Counties that do not fall new definitions, and had invited public definitions that will be as consistent as
within CBSAs (either MSAs or comment on them. Accordingly, we possible for all MSAs nationwide.
Micropolitan Areas) are deemed decided to defer proposing any new In addition, in numerous instances,
‘‘Outside CBSAs.’’ In the past, the OMB labor market definitions in the SNF the Congress has recognized that the
defined MSAs around areas with a context at that time, in order to allow areas developed by OMB may be used
minimum core population of 50,000, the public sufficient time and for differentiating among geographic
and smaller areas were ‘‘Outside opportunity to consider and provide areas for Medicare payment purposes.
MSAs.’’ On June 6, 2003, the OMB comments on this issue. Although the For example, in the IPPS statutory
announced the new CBSAs, comprised June 30, 2004 update notice also invited sections, the Congress defines an ‘‘urban
of MSAs and the new Micropolitan comments on the possible application of area’’ as ‘‘an area within a Metropolitan
Areas based on Census 2000 data. (A the new definitions to the SNF PPS, we Statistical Area (as defined by the Office
copy of the announcement may be received no written comments on the of Management and Budget) or within
obtained at the following Internet use of the new definitions specifically such similar area as the Secretary has
address: http://www.whitehouse.gov/ in the SNF context; however, we did recognized’’ (section 1886(d)(2)(D) of
omb/bulletins/fy04/b04–03.html.) receive a few phone calls inquiring the Act). Similarly, in the sections of the
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29092 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
statute governing the guidelines to be definitions based on the OMB’s new alternative. We believe that adopting
used by the Medicare Geographic CBSA designations (as discussed in county-based labor market areas for the
Classification Review Board for greater detail below) effective for SNF entire country except those in New
purposes of reclassification, the PPS services occurring on or after England would lead to inconsistencies
Congress directed the Secretary to create October 1, 2005. Accordingly, we are in our designations. Adopting county-
guidelines for ‘‘determining whether the proposing to revise § 413.337(a)(ii) to based labor market areas for the entire
county in which the hospital is located specify that for services furnished on or country provides consistency and
should be treated as being a part of a after October 1, 2005, the application of stability in Medicare SNF PPS program
particular [MSA]’’ (sections the wage index under the SNF PPS payment because all of the labor market
1886(d)(10)(A) and 1886(d)(10)(D)(i)(II) would be made on the basis of the areas throughout the country, including
of the Act). Thus, the Congress has location of the facility in an urban or New England, would be defined using
accepted and ratified the use of MSAs rural area as defined in the same system (that is, counties)
as an inherently rational manner of § 412.64(b)(1)(ii)(A) through (C). rather than different systems in different
dividing up labor-market areas for We note that the OMB’s new CBSA areas of the country, thus minimizing
purposes of Medicare payments. designations are the same labor market programmatic complexity.
The process used by OMB to develop area definitions implemented under the In addition, we have consistently
the MSAs creates geographic areas IPPS at § 412.64(b), which were effective employed a county-based system for
based upon characteristics that we for those hospitals beginning October 1, New England for precisely that reason:
believe also generally reflect the 2004, as discussed in the August 11, To maintain consistency with the labor
characteristics of unified labor market 2004 IPPS final rule (69 FR 49026 market definitions used throughout the
areas. For example, the CBSAs reflect a through 49034). The similarity between country. We note that this is consistent
core population plus an adjacent the IPPS and the SNF PPS includes the with the implementation of the CBSA
territory that reflects a high degree of adoption in the initial implementation designations under the IPPS for New
social and economic integration. This of the SNF PPS of the same labor market England (see August 11, 2004 (69 FR
integration is measured by commuting area definitions under the SNF PPS that 49028)). Accordingly, under the SNF
ties, thus demonstrating that these areas existed under the IPPS at that time, as PPS we are proposing to use the New
may draw workers from the same well as the use of acute care hospitals’ England MSAs as determined under the
general areas. In addition, the most wage data in calculating the SNF PPS proposed new CBSA-based labor market
recent CBSAs reflect the most up to date wage index. Therefore, we believe that area definitions in defining the
information. The OMB reviews its MA proposing to revise the SNF PPS labor proposed revised SNF PPS labor market
definitions preceding each decennial market area definitions based on OMB’s areas.
census to reflect recent population CBSA designations is consistent with
b. Metropolitan Divisions
changes, and the CBSAs are based on our historical practice of generally
the Census 2000 data. Finally, in the modeling SNF PPS wage index policy Under the OMB’s new CBSA
context of the IPPS, CMS has reviewed after IPPS wage index policy. designations, a Metropolitan Division is
alternative methods for determining Below, we discuss the composition of a county or group of counties within a
geographic areas for purposes of the the proposed SNF PPS labor market CBSA that contains a core population of
wage index, and in each case, has areas based on the OMB’s new CBSA at least 2.5 million, representing an
decided to retain the OMB designations designations. employment center, plus adjacent
rather than replace these designations counties associated with the main
a. New England MSAs county or counties through commuting
with alternatives.
Because we believe that we have As stated above, under the SNF PPS, ties. A county qualifies as a main county
broad authority to create labor market we currently use NECMAs to define if 65 percent or more of its employed
areas, and because we also believe that labor market areas in New England, residents work within the county and
the OMB’s latest MA designations because these are county-based the ratio of the number of jobs located
accurately reflect the local economies designations rather than the 1990 MSA in the county to the number of
and wage levels of the areas in which definitions for New England, which employed residents is at least 0.75
hospitals are currently located, we are used minor civil divisions such as cities percent. A county qualifies as a
proposing to adopt the revised labor and towns. Under the current MSA secondary county if 50 percent or more,
market area designations based on the definitions, NECMAs provided more but less than 65 percent, of its employed
OMB’s CBSA designations. consistency in labor market definitions residents work within the county and
When we implemented the wage for New England compared with the rest the ratio of the number of jobs located
index adjustment at § 413.337(a)(ii) of the country, where MSAs are county- in the county to the number of
under the SNF PPS in the May 12, 1998 based. Under the new CBSAs, the OMB employed residents is at least 0.75
SNF PPS interim final rule (63 FR has now defined the MSAs and percent. After all the main and
26252), we explained that the SNF PPS Micropolitan Areas in New England on secondary counties are identified and
wage index adjustment was intended to the basis of counties. The OMB also grouped, each additional county that
reflect the relative hospital wage levels established New England City and already has qualified for inclusion in
in the geographic area of the hospital as Town Areas, which are similar to the the MSA falls within the Metropolitan
compared to the national average previous New England MSAs. Division associated with the main/
hospital wage level. Because we believe In order to create consistency among secondary county or counties with
that the OMB’s CBSA designations all labor market areas and to maintain which the county at issue has the
based on Census 2000 data reflect the these areas on the basis of counties, we highest employment interchange
most recent available geographic are proposing to use the county-based measure. Counties in a Metropolitan
classifications (MA definitions), we are areas for all MSAs in the nation, Division must be contiguous (see 65 FR
proposing to revise the labor market including those in New England. Census 82236).
area definitions used under the SNF 2000 has now defined the New England As noted above, in the past, the OMB
PPS. Specifically, we are proposing to area based on counties, creating a city- designated CMSAs as Metropolitan
revise the SNF PPS labor market and town-based system as an Areas with a population of one million
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29093
or more and comprised of two or more SNF PPS MSA designations, Boston was of the respective statewide rural wage
PMSAs. Under the SNF PPS, we a single NECMA. Under the proposed indexes would affect the value of the
currently use the PMSAs rather than CBSA-based labor market area Statewide rural wage index of any State
CMSAs to define labor market areas designations, it would be comprised of that contains a Micropolitan Area. A
because they comprise a smaller 4 Metropolitan Divisions. Los Angeles hospital’s classification as urban or rural
geographic area with potentially varying would go from 4 PMSAs under the affects which hospitals’ wage data are
labor costs due to different local current SNF PPS MSA designations to 2 included in the statewide rural wage
economies. We believe that CMSAs may Metropolitan Divisions under the index. As discussed above in section
be too large an area to reflect accurately proposed CBSA-based labor market area II.D.3, we combine all of the counties in
the local labor costs of all of the designations. The New York CMSA a State outside a designated urban area
individual SNFs included in that would go from 15 PMSAs under the to calculate the statewide rural wage
relatively ‘‘large’’ area. Similarly, we current SNF PPS MSA designations to index for each State.
believe that Metropolitan Divisions only 4 Metropolitan Divisions under the Micropolitan Areas included as part
under the CBSA designations may be proposed CBSA-based labor market area of the statewide rural labor market area
too large an area to reflect accurately the designations. Five PMSAs in would result in an increase to the
local labor costs of all of the individual Connecticut under the current SNF PPS statewide rural wage index because
SNFs included in that relatively ‘‘large’’ MSA designations would become hospitals located in those Micropolitan
area. Further, Metropolitan Divisions separate MSAs under the proposed Areas typically have higher labor costs
represent the closest approximation to CBSA-based labor market area than other rural hospitals in the State.
PMSAs and, therefore, would most designations. The number of PMSAs in Alternatively, as discussed in greater
accurately maintain our current New Jersey, under the current SNF PPS detail below, if Micropolitan Areas
structuring of the SNF PPS labor market MSA designations would go from 5 to would be recognized as independent
areas. Therefore, as implemented under 2, with the consolidation of 2 New labor market areas, because there would
the IPPS (69 FR 49029), we are Jersey PMSAs (Bergen-Passaic and be so few hospitals in those areas to
proposing to use the Metropolitan Jersey City) into the New York-Wayne- complete a wage index, the wage
Divisions where applicable (as White Plains, NY–NJ Division, under indexes for SNFs in those areas could
described below) under the proposed the proposed CBSA-based labor market become relatively unstable as they
new CBSA-based labor market area area designations. In San Francisco, would change considerably from year to
definitions. under the proposed CBSA-based labor year.
In addition to being comparable to the market area designations there are only We currently use MSAs to define
organization of the labor market areas 2 Divisions. Currently, there are 6 urban labor market areas and group all
under current MSA designations, we PMSAs, some of which are now separate of the hospitals in counties within each
believe that proposing to use MSAs under the current SNF PPS labor State that are not assigned to an MSA
Metropolitan Divisions where market area designations. into a statewide rural labor market area.
applicable (as described below) under Under the current SNF PPS labor Therefore, we used the terms ‘‘urban’’
the SNF PPS would result in a more market area designations, Cincinnati, and ‘‘rural’’ wage indexes in the past for
accurate adjustment for the variation in Cleveland, Denver, Houston, ease of reference. However, the
local labor market areas for SNFs. Milwaukee, Portland, Sacramento, and introduction of Micropolitan Areas by
Specifically, if we recognize the San Juan are all designated as CMSAs, the OMB potentially complicates this
relatively ‘‘larger’’ CBSA that comprises but would no longer be designated as terminology because these areas include
two or more Metropolitan Divisions as CMSAs under the proposed CBSA-based many hospitals that are currently
an independent labor market area for labor market area designations. As noted included in the statewide rural labor
purposes of the wage index, it would be previously, the population threshold to market areas.
too large and would include the data be designated a CMSA under the current We are proposing to treat
from too many hospitals to compute a SNF PPS labor market area designations Micropolitan Areas as rural labor market
wage index that would accurately reflect is one million. In most of these cases, areas under the SNF PPS for the reasons
the various local labor costs of all of the counties currently in a PMSA would outlined below. That is, counties that
individual hospitals included in that become a separate, independent MSA are assigned to a Micropolitan area
relatively ‘‘large’’ CBSA. By proposing under the proposed CBSA-based labor under the CBSA designations would be
to recognize Metropolitan Divisions market area designations, leaving only treated the same as other ‘‘rural’’
where applicable (as described below) the MSA for the core area under the counties that are not assigned to either
under the proposed new CBSA-based proposed CBSA-based labor market area an MSA (Metropolitan Area) or a
labor market area definitions under the designations. Micropolitan Area. Therefore, in
SNF PPS, we believe that the local labor determining an SNF’s applicable wage
c. Micropolitan Areas index (based on IPPS hospital wage
costs would be more accurately
reflected, thereby resulting in a wage Under the OMB’s new CBSA index data, as discussed in greater detail
index adjustment that better reflects the designations, Micropolitan Areas are below in section II.D.6 of this preamble),
variation in the local labor costs of the essentially a third area definition we propose that a SNF in a Micropolitan
local economies of the SNFs located in consisting primarily of areas that are Area under the OMB’s CBSA
those relatively ‘‘smaller’’ areas. currently rural, but also include some or designations would be classified as
Under the CBSA designations, there all of areas that are currently designated ‘‘rural’’ and would be assigned the
are 11 MSAs containing Metropolitan as urban MSAs. As discussed in greater statewide rural wage index for the State
Divisions: Boston; Chicago; Dallas; detail in the August 11, 2004 IPPS final in which it resides.
Detroit; Los Angeles; Miami; New York; rule (69 FR 49029 through 49032), how In the August 11, 2004 IPPS final rule
Philadelphia; San Francisco; Seattle; these areas are treated would have (69 FR 49029 through 49032), we
and Washington, D.C. Although these significant impacts on the calculation discussed the impact of treating
MSAs were also CMSAs under the prior and application of the wage index. Micropolitan areas as part of the
definitions, in some cases their areas Specifically, whether or not statewide rural labor market area
have been altered. Under the current Micropolitan Areas are included as part instead of treating Micropolitan Areas as
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29094 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
independent labor market areas for changes. At the same time, a significant to the proposed wage index structure.
hospitals paid under the IPPS. As number of SNFs will benefit from these During our analysis, we found that a
discussed in greater detail in that same proposed changes. However, as majority of SNFs (61 percent) either
final rule, Micropolitan Areas explained below, we are not proposing maintained the same wage index or
encompass smaller populations than a transition period in this proposed rule. would get an increased wage index
MSAs and tend to include fewer based on CBSA definitions. Only a very
5. Implementation of the Revised Labor
hospitals per Micropolitan Area. small number of SNFs (4 percent) would
Thus, since Micropolitan Areas tend Market Areas
experience a decline of 5 percent or
to include fewer hospitals, recognizing Under section 1888(e)(4)(G)(ii) of the more in the wage index based on CBSA
Micropolitan Areas as independent Act, the Secretary has the authority to designations. We also found that only a
labor market areas would generally adjust for geographic variations in labor very small number of SNFs would
increase the potential for dramatic shifts costs by using an appropriate wage experience a change in either rural or
in those areas’ wage indexes from one index. Moreover, the adjustment must urban designation under the CBSA
year to the next, because a single be made in a manner such that aggregate based definitions. Furthermore, we
hospital (or group of hospitals) could payments would not change if such believe the new CBSA definitions may
have a disproportionate effect on the adjustment were not made. have a positive impact on many
wage index of the area. Dramatic shifts To facilitate an understanding of the counties. For example, most counties
in an area’s wage index from year to proposed policies related to the which had been included in the rural
year are problematic and create proposed change to the SNF PPS labor definitions under the MSA designations
instability in the payment levels from market areas discussed above, in Table but are now designated as urban areas
year to year, which could make fiscal A (MSA/CBSA Crosswalk) of the under CBSAs will generally receive an
planning for SNFs difficult if we Addendum of this proposed rule, we are increase in their wage index.
adopted this approach. Therefore, in providing a listing of each Social Although a majority of SNFs would
order to minimize the potential Security Administration (SSA) State and not be significantly affected, and we
instability in payment levels from year county location code; State and county believe that it is not appropriate or
to year, we believe it would be name; existing MSA-based labor market necessary to propose a transition to the
appropriate to treat Micropolitan Areas area designation; MSA-based wage proposed new CBSA-based labor market
as part of the statewide rural labor index value; CBSA-based labor market areas for the purpose of the SNF PPS
market area under the SNF PPS. area; and the new CBSA-based wage wage index, we recognize that there are
Consistent with the treatment of these index value. many options in efficiently
areas under the IPPS, we are proposing When the revised labor market areas implementing the new CBSA geographic
that Micropolitan Areas be considered a based on OMB’s new CBSA designations. Thus, we considered
part of the Statewide rural labor market designations were adopted under the several budget neutral options that
area. Accordingly, we are proposing that IPPS beginning on October 1, 2004, a would most effectively implement the
the SNF PPS Statewide rural wage index transition to the new designations was adoption of the proposed CBSA
would be determined using acute-care established due to the scope and fiscal designations as discussed below.
IPPS hospital wage data from hospitals impact of these new boundaries. As One option we considered institutes a
located in non-MSA areas and that the discussed in the IPPS final rule (69 FR one-year transition with a blended wage
Statewide rural wage index would be 49032), during FY 2005, a blend of wage index for all providers. The wage index
assigned to SNFs located in those areas. indexes is calculated for those acute for each provider would consist of a
When the revised labor market areas care IPPS hospitals experiencing a drop blend of 50 percent of the FY 2006
based on the OMB’s new CBSA in their wage indexes because of the MSA-based wage index and 50 percent
designations were adopted under the adoption of the new labor market areas. of the FY 2006 CBSA-based wage index
IPPS beginning on October 1, 2004, a The most significant impacts will (both based on the FY 2002 hospital
transition to the new designations was generally be for MSA-based urban wage data). However, we found that
established due to the scope and hospitals that were designated as rural while this would help some SNFs that
magnitude of the change, in order to under the CBSA-based designations. would be adversely affected by the
mitigate the resulting adverse impact on Because the former MSA-based labor proposed changes to the MSAs, it would
certain hospitals. As discussed in the market areas used under the IPPS had also reduce the wage index values
August 11, 2004 IPPS final rule (69 FR been used for payment for over 10 years, (compared to fully adopting the CBSA
49032), during FY 2005, a blend of wage we believed it was necessary to provide wage index value) for those SNFs that
indexes is calculated for those acute additional protection, given the scope would be positively affected by the
care IPPS hospitals experiencing a drop and potentially significant implications changes. In addition, the budget
in their wage indexes because of the (and the subsequent adverse impact) of neutrality factor calculated based on the
adoption of the new labor market areas. these new labor market areas on blended wage index for all SNFs would
Also, as described in that same final numerous acute-care hospitals. slightly reduce the unadjusted payment
rule (69 FR 49032), under the IPPS, Therefore, we implemented a transition rate for all providers.
hospitals that previously had been under the IPPS from the former MSA- A second option we considered was a
located in an urban MSA but became based labor market area designation to one-year transition with a blended wage
rural under the new CBSA definitions the new CBSA-based labor market area index limited to providers that would
are assigned the wage index value of the designation for acute-care hospitals that experience a decrease due solely to the
urban area to which they belonged would receive a lower wage index as a changes in the labor market definitions.
previously, for 3 years (FYs 2005 result of the change in the labor market Providers that experience a decrease in
through FYs 2007). area designations. their FY 2006 wage index under the
We recognize that SNFs will be As we recognize that SNFs may CBSA-based definitions compared to the
subject to the same impact as hospitals, experience similar changes in their wage index they would have received
and that some SNFs may experience wage indexes as a result of the proposed under the MSA-based definitions (in
decreases in their wage index as a result labor market area changes, we carefully both cases using FY 2002 hospital wage
of the proposed labor market area evaluated the impact of the conversion data) would receive a blended wage
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29095
index. The wage index for these an even smaller number of SNFs would PPS. As we discussed in the May 12,
providers would consist of a blend of 50 experience a change from their current 1998 SNF PPS interim final rule (63 FR
percent of the FY 2006 MSA wage index urban or rural designation. Therefore, 26252), as hospitals that are excluded
and 50 percent of the FY 2006 CBSA the aggregate impact on SNFs under the from the IPPS are not required to
wage index (both based on the FY 2002 MSA-based designations as compared to provide wage-related information on the
hospital wage data). Providers that the CBSA-based designations does not Medicare cost report, and because we
would experience a decrease due to result in a dramatic change overall. would need to establish instructions for
changes in the labor market definitions As explained above, we believe that it the collection of these SNF data in order
would receive the full FY 2006 CBSA is not appropriate or necessary to to establish a geographic reclassification
wage index. propose a transition to the proposed adjustment under the SNF PPS, the
When we performed our analysis, we new CBSA-based labor market area for wage adjustment established under the
found that the unadjusted payment the SNF PPS wage index adjustment. In SNF PPS is based on a SNF’s actual
amounts decreased substantially more addition, as noted above, we believe the location without regard to the urban or
under this option than they did either data suggest that the potential benefit of rural designation of any related or
by using the first option discussed a hold harmless policy for an extremely affiliated provider.
above or by fully adopting the CBSA small number of providers would be In this proposed rule, for the FY 2006
designations. As with the first option, outweighed by the resulting decrease in SNF PPS rate year, we propose to use
the positive impact of blending in order payment rates for all providers. acute care hospital inpatient wage index
to decrease the impacts for a relatively However, we specifically invite public data generated from cost reporting
small number of SNFs would require comments on our proposed approach, as periods beginning during FY 2002
reduced payment rates for all providers, well as on the various transition options (without taking into account geographic
including the SNFs receiving a blended discussed above. reclassification under sections
wage index. Finally, we note that section 505 of 1886(d)(8) and 1886(d)(10) of the Act
We also recognize that during FY the MMA established new section and without applying the ‘‘rural floor’’
2005, as discussed in the August 11, 1886(d)(13) of the Act. The new section under section 4410 of the BBA) to
2004 IPPS final rule (69 FR 49032), a 1886(d)(13) requires that the Secretary determine the applicable wage index
hold harmless policy under IPPS was establish a process to make adjustments values under the SNF PPS, because
implemented to minimize the overall to the hospital wage index based on these data (FY 2002) are the most recent
impact on hospitals that are currently commuting patterns of hospital complete data. We realize that there has
designated as urban under the MSA employees. We believe that this been some interest in developing a SNF-
designations, but would become rural requirement for an ‘‘out-commuting’’ or specific wage index. However,
under the CBSA designations. We ‘‘out-migration’’ adjustment applies considering the impact of converting to
considered adopting a hold harmless specifically to the Hospital Inpatient the new OMB classification
policy for SNFs, to allow facilities that Prospective Payment System. Therefore, methodology discussed above, we
are currently urban under the MSA we will not be establishing such an believe a second major change would be
definitions (but become rural under the adjustment for the SNF PPS. inappropriate at this time. In making
CBSA definitions) to maintain their this decision, one of our primary
6. Wage Index Data
urban status under the CBSA definitions concerns is that the combined effect of
for one year. However, our analysis [If you choose to comment on issues in changing both the wage area categories
shows that only an extremely small this section, please include the caption and the actual wage index could result
number of SNFs would qualify for such ‘‘Wage Index Data’’ at the beginning of in an inaccurate impact assessment for
a hold harmless policy. As any your comments.] one or both of these changes. As
adjustment requires payments to be In the FY 2005 SNF PPS update discussed in several of the previous SNF
made in a budget neutral manner, all notice (69 FR 45775, July 30, 2004), we PPS rules, we also remain concerned
providers would have the payment rates established SNF PPS wage index values about the potential volatility and
reduced for the benefit of that small for the 2005 SNF PPS rate year unreliability of unaudited data (see, for
number of SNFs (1.4 percent) which calculated from the same data example, the final rule for FY 2002 (66
lose their urban designations. (generated in cost reporting periods FR 39579 through 39596, July 31, 2001),
Accordingly, we do not believe it is beginning during FY 2001) used to and the final rule for FY 2004 (68 FR
appropriate or necessary to adopt a hold compute the FY 2005 acute care 46045 through 46046, August 3, 2003)).
harmless policy under the SNF PPS for hospital inpatient wage index data, We are proposing to adopt OMB’s
facilities that will experience a change without taking into account geographic new labor market designations for CY
in designation under the CBSA reclassification under sections 2006, effective January 1, 2006. In
definitions. 1886(d)(8) and 1886(d)(10) of the Act adopting the CBSA designations, we
We are proposing to adopt for the SNF and without applying the ‘‘rural floor’’ identified some geographic areas where
PPS the new CBSA-based labor market under section 4410 of the BBA. We there were no hospitals, and thus no
area definitions beginning with the 2006 subsequently published correction hospital wage index data on which to
SNF PPS rate year without a transition notices to update the wage index values. base the calculation of the FY 2006 SNF
period and without a hold harmless The SNF wage index values applicable PPS proposed wage index. In addressing
policy. We also note that OMB in the for services furnished on or after this situation, we are proposing
past has announced MSA changes on an October 1, 2004 through August 31, approaches that we believe serve as
annual basis due to population changes 2005 are shown in Table 8 (for urban proxies for hospital wage data and
and we have not transitioned these areas) and Table 9 (for rural areas) in the would provide an appropriate standard
changes under the SNF PPS. December 30, 2004 correction notice (69 that accounts for geographic variation in
As noted previously, our data analysis FR 78445). labor costs.
shows that a minimal number of SNFs Acute care hospital inpatient wage The first situation involves rural
would experience a decrease of more index data is also used to establish the locations in Massachusetts and Puerto
than 5 percent in the wage index. In wage index adjustment used in the Rico. Under these labor market areas,
addition, under the CBSA designation, LTCH PPS, IPF PPS, HHA PPS, and IRF there are no rural hospitals in those
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29096 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
locations. Because there is no greater detail in section III.C of this administrative presumption, we propose
reasonable proxy for more recent rural preamble. to designate the upper 35 groups of the
data within those areas, we are proposed 53-group refined case-mix
F. Relationship of RUG–III Classification
proposing to use last year’s wage index classification system (including the
System to Existing Skilled Nursing
value for rural Massachusetts and rural upper 26 groups that we have identified
Facility Level-of-Care Criteria
Puerto Rico. as representing a covered level of care
The second situation has to do with As discussed in § 413.345, we include under the existing 44-group system,
the urban areas of Hinesville, GA (CBSA in each update of the Federal payment plus the additional 9 groups set forth in
25980) and Mansfield, OH (CBSA rates in the Federal Register the this proposed rule), consisting of the
31900). Again, under the proposed new designation of those specific RUGs following RUG classifications: All
labor market areas there are no urban under the classification system that groups within the proposed new
hospitals within those areas. We represent the required SNF level of care, Rehabilitation plus Extensive Services
propose to use all of the urban areas as provided in § 409.30. This category; all groups within the Ultra
within the State to serve as a reasonable designation reflects an administrative High Rehabilitation category; all groups
proxy for the urban areas without presumption under the current 44-group within the Very High Rehabilitation
specific hospital wage index data in RUG–III classification system. Our category; all groups within the High
determining the SNF PPS wage index. presumption is that any beneficiary who Rehabilitation category; all groups
Therefore, in this proposed rule, we is correctly assigned to one of the upper within the Medium Rehabilitation
calculated the urban wage index value 26 RUG–III groups in the initial 5-day, category; all groups within the Low
for purposes of the wage index for these Medicare-required assessment is Rehabilitation category; all groups
areas without urban hospital data as the automatically classified as meeting the within the Extensive Services category;
average wage index for all urban areas SNF level of care definition up to the all groups within the Special Care
within the State. We note that we could assessment reference date for that category; and, all groups within the
not apply a similar averaging in rural assessment. Clinically Complex category.
areas, because in the rural areas there Any beneficiary assigned to any of the
lower 18 groups is not automatically G. Initial 3-Year Transition Period From
are no State rural hospital wage data
classified as either meeting or not Facility Specific to Federal Rates
available for averaging on a State-wide
basis. We solicit comments on these meeting the definition, but instead As noted previously in section I.A
approaches to calculating the wage receives an individual level of care and section I.F.2 of this proposed rule,
index values for areas without hospitals determination using the existing the PPS is no longer operating under the
for FY 2006 and subsequent years. administrative criteria. This initial 3-year transition period from
The proposed wage index values that presumption recognizes the strong facility-specific to Federal rates.
would be applicable for SNF PPS likelihood that beneficiaries assigned to Therefore, payment now equals the
services furnished on or after October 1, one of the upper 26 groups during the adjusted Federal per diem rate.
2005 through August 31, 2006 are immediate post-hospital period require
H. Example of Computation of Adjusted
shown in Tables 8 and 9 in the a covered level of care, which would be
PPS Rates and SNF Payment
Addendum of this proposed rule. significantly less likely for those
beneficiaries assigned to one of the As explained in section II.B of this
E. Updates to the Federal Rates lower 18 groups. proposed rule, from October 1, 2005,
In accordance with section As discussed in section II.B of this through December 31, 2005, we propose
1888(e)(4)(E) of the Act and section 311 preamble, we propose to refine the to make payment based entirely on the
of the BIPA, the proposed payment rates existing 44-group RUG–III classification existing 44-group RUG–III classification
listed here reflect a proposed update system by adding an additional 9 system (including any associated add-on
equal to the full SNF market basket, groups, comprising a new Rehabilitation payments). Using the model SNF (XYZ)
estimated at 3.0 percentage points. We plus Extensive Services category. In described in Table 10, the following
will continue to disseminate the rates, effect, the groups in this new category shows the adjustments made to the
wage index, and case-mix classification would encompass care that is at least as Federal per diem rate to compute the
methodology through the Federal intensive as that identified by any of the provider’s actual per diem PPS for the
Register before August 1 preceding the upper 26 RUG–III groups under the time period mentioned above using the
start of each succeeding fiscal year. We original, 44-group RUG–III classification existing 44 group RUG-III classification
discuss the Federal rate update factor in system. Accordingly, for purposes of the system.
TABLE 10.—RUG–44, SNF XYZ: LOCATED IN STATE COLLEGE, PA, WAGE INDEX: 0.8364
Adjustment Adjustment Percent Medicare
RUG group Labor Wage index Non-labor Payment
labor rate adjustment days
Total .......................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 100 28,156
* Reflects a 6.7 percent adjustment from section 314 of the BIPA.
** Reflects a 128 percent adjustment from section 511 of the MMA. Section 101(a) of the BBRA no longer applies because of the MMA section
511 adjustment.
*** Reflects a 20 percent adjustment from section 101(a) of the BBRA.
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29097
Beginning January 1, 2006, we system (and, thus, would not include payments under the RUG–53
propose to make payment based on the the add-on payments). Table 10a shows classification system.
proposed new RUG–53 classification an example of the actual per diem PPS
TABLE 10A.—RUG–53, SNF XYZ: LOCATED IN STATE COLLEGE, PA, WAGE INDEX: 0.8364
Adjustment Adjustment Percent Medicare
RUG group Labor Wage index Non-labor Payment
labor rate adjustment days
Total .......................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 100 26,946
* Reflects a 128 percent adjustment from section 511 of the MMA.
III. The Skilled Nursing Facility Market TABLE 11.—FY 2006 LABOR-RELATEDfor an adjustment to account for market
Basket Index SHARE—Continued basket forecast error. The initial
adjustment applied to the update of the
Section 1888(e)(5)(A) of the Act Relative im- Relative im- FY 2003 rate that occurred in FY 2004,
requires us to establish a SNF market portance, portance, and took into account the cumulative
basket index (input price index) that labor-re- labor-re- forecast error for the period from FY
reflects changes over time in the prices lated, lated,
FY 2005 FY 2006 2000 through FY 2002. Subsequent
of an appropriate mix of goods and (97 index) (97 index) adjustments in succeeding FYs take into
services included in the SNF PPS. This account the forecast error from the most
proposed rule incorporates the latest Labor-intensive recently available fiscal year for which
available projections of the SNF market services ......... 4.125 4.116 there are final data, and are applied
basket index. The final rule will Capital-related .. 3.094 3.006 whenever the difference between the
incorporate updated projections based Total .............. 76.222 76.087
forecasted and actual change in the
on the latest available projections at that market basket exceeds a 0.25 percentage
time. Accordingly, we have developed a A. Use of the Skilled Nursing Facility point threshold. As discussed
SNF market basket index that Market Basket Percentage previously in section I.G of this
encompasses the most commonly used Section 1888(e)(5)(B) of the Act proposed rule, as the difference between
cost categories for SNF routine services, defines the SNF market basket the estimated and actual amounts of
ancillary services, and capital-related percentage as the percentage change in increase in the market basket index for
expenses. In the July 31, 2001 Federal the SNF market basket index, as FY 2004 (the most recently available
Register (66 FR 39562), we included a described in the previous section, from fiscal year for which there are final data)
complete discussion on the rebasing of the average index level of the prior did not exceed the 0.25 percentage point
the SNF market basket to FY 1997. fiscal year to the average index level of threshold, the payment rates for FY
There are 21 separate cost categories the current fiscal year. For the Federal 2006 do not include a forecast error
and respective price proxies. These cost rates established in this proposed rule, adjustment.
categories were illustrated in Table this percentage increase in the SNF
10.A, Table 10.B, and Appendix A, market basket index would be used to C. Federal Rate Update Factor
along with other relevant information, compute the update factor occurring Section 1888(e)(4)(E)(ii)(IV) of the Act
in the July 31, 2001 Federal Register. between FY 2005 and FY 2006. We used requires that the update factor used to
Each year, we calculate a revised the Global Insight, Inc. (formerly DRI- establish the FY 2006 Federal rates be
labor-related share based on the relative WEFA), 1st quarter 2005 forecasted at a level equal to the full market basket
importance of labor-related cost percentage increase in the FY 1997- percentage change. Accordingly, to
categories in the input price index. based SNF market basket index for establish the update factor, we
Table 11 summarizes the proposed routine, ancillary, and capital-related determined the total growth from the
updated labor-related share for FY 2006. expenses, described in the previous average market basket level for the
section, to compute the update factor. period of October 1, 2004 through
Finally, we no longer compute update September 30, 2005 to the average
TABLE 11.—FY 2006 LABOR-RELATED
factors to adjust a facility-specific market basket level for the period of
SHARE portion of the SNF PPS rates, because October 1, 2005 through September 30,
the 3-year transition period from 2006. Using this process, the proposed
Relative im- Relative im-
portance, portance, facility-specific to full Federal rates that update factor for FY 2006 SNF Federal
labor-re- labor-re- started with cost reporting periods rates is 3.0 percentage points. We used
lated, lated, beginning in July 1998 has expired. this revised proposed update factor to
FY 2005 FY 2006 compute the proposed Federal portion
(97 index) (97 index) B. Market Basket Forecast Error
Adjustment of the SNF PPS rate shown in Tables 2
Wages and sala- and 3.
ries ................ 54.720 54.572 As discussed in the June 10, 2003,
supplemental proposed rule (68 FR IV. Consolidated Billing
Employee bene-
fits .................. 11.595 11.691 34768) and finalized in the August 4, As established by section 4432(b) of
Nonmedical pro- 2003, final rule (68 FR 46067), the the BBA, the consolidated billing
fessional fees 2.688 2.702 regulations at § 413.337(d)(2) provide requirement places with the SNF the
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29098 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Medicare billing responsibility for Rep. No. 106–479 at 854) characterizes services that would actually represent a
virtually all of the services that the the individual services that this substantive change in the scope of
SNF’s residents receive, except for a legislation targets for exclusion as services that are excluded from the SNF
small number of services that the statute ‘‘* * * high-cost, low probability events consolidated billing provision, we
specifically identifies as being excluded that could have devastating financial would identify these additional
from this provision. Section 103 of the impacts because their costs far exceed excluded services by means of the
BBRA amended this provision by the payment [SNFs] receive under the HCPCS codes that are in effect as of a
further excluding a number of high-cost, prospective payment system * * *’’ specific date (in this case, October 1,
low probability services (identified by According to the conferees, section 2005). By making any new exclusions in
Healthcare Common Procedure Coding 103(a) ‘‘is an attempt to exclude from this manner, we could similarly
System (HCPCS) codes) within several the PPS certain services and costly accomplish routine future updates of
broader categories that otherwise items that are provided infrequently in these additional codes through the
remained subject to the provision. SNFs * * *.’’ By contrast, we noted that issuance of program instructions.
Section 313 of the BIPA further the Congress declined to designate for
V. Application of the SNF PPS to SNF
amended this provision by repealing its exclusion any of the remaining services
Services Furnished by Swing-Bed
Part B aspect; that is, its applicability to within those four categories (thus
Hospitals
services furnished to a resident during leaving all of those services subject to
a SNF stay that Medicare does not SNF consolidated billing), because they In accordance with section 1888(e)(7)
cover. (However, physical, are relatively inexpensive and are of the Act (as amended by section 203
occupational, and speech-language furnished routinely in SNFs. of the BIPA), Part A pays critical access
therapy remain subject to consolidated As we further explained in the final hospitals (CAHs) on a reasonable cost
billing, regardless of whether the rule of July 31, 2000 (65 FR 46790), any basis for SNF services furnished under
resident who receives these services is additional service codes that we might a swing-bed agreement. However, as
in a covered Part A stay.) designate for exclusion under our noted previously in section I.A of this
Further, while the services of rural discretionary authority must meet the notice, the services furnished by non-
health clinics (RHCs) and Federally same criteria that the Congress used in CAH rural hospitals are paid under the
Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) identifying the original codes excluded SNF PPS. In the July 31, 2001 final rule
generally are subject to SNF from consolidated billing under section (66 FR 39562), we announced the
consolidated billing, section 410 of the 103(a) of the BBRA: They must fall conversion of swing-bed rural hospitals
MMA provided that when an RHC or within one of the four service categories to the SNF PPS, effective with the start
FQHC furnishes the services of a specified in the BBRA, and they also of the provider’s first cost reporting
physician (or another type of service must meet the same standards of high period beginning on or after July 1,
that section 1888(e)(2)(A)(ii) of the Act cost and low probability in the SNF 2002. We selected this date consistent
identifies as being excluded from SNF setting. Accordingly, we characterized with the statutory provision to integrate
consolidated billing), those services do this statutory authority to identify swing-bed rural hospitals into the SNF
not become subject to consolidated additional service codes for exclusion PPS by the end of the SNF transition
billing merely by virtue of being ‘‘* * * as essentially affording the period, June 30, 2002.
furnished under the auspices of the RHC flexibility to revise the list of excluded As of June 30, 2003, all swing-bed
or FQHC. In effect, this provision codes in response to changes of major rural hospitals have come under the
(which applies to services furnished on significance that may occur over time SNF PPS. Therefore, all rates and wage
or after January 1, 2005) enables those (for example, the development of new indexes outlined in earlier sections of
services to retain their separate identity medical technologies or other advances this notice for SNF PPS also apply to all
as excluded ‘‘practitioner’’ services in in the state of medical practice)’’ (65 FR swing-bed rural hospitals. A complete
this context, rather than being treated as 46791). In view of the amount of time discussion of assessment schedules, the
bundled ‘‘RHC’’ or ‘‘FQHC’’ services. As that has elapsed since we last invited MDS, and the transmission software
such, these services would remain comments on this issue, we believe it is (Raven-SB for Swing Beds) can be found
separately billable to Part B when appropriate at this point once again to in the July 31, 2001 final rule (66 FR
furnished to a resident of the SNF invite public comments that identify 39562). The latest changes in the MDS
during a covered Part A stay. codes in any of these four service for swing-bed rural hospitals are listed
To date, the Congress has enacted no categories representing recent medical on our SNF PPS Web site, http://
further legislation affecting the advances that might meet the BBRA www.cms.hhs.gov/providers/snfpps/
consolidated billing provision. criteria for exclusion from SNF default.asp.
However, as we noted in the proposed consolidated billing.
VI. Qualifying Three-Day Inpatient
rule of April 10, 2000 (65 FR 19232), We note that the original BBRA
section 1888(e)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act, as legislation (as well as the implementing Hospital Stay Requirement
added by section 103 of the BBRA, not regulations) identified a set of excluded As indicated in section I.A of this
only identified for exclusion from this services by means of specifying HCPCS proposed rule, the SNF benefit includes
provision a number of particular service codes that were in effect as of a not only level of care requirements, but
codes within four specified categories particular date (for example July 1, also a set of technical, or ‘‘posthospital’’
(that is, chemotherapy items, 1999). Identifying the excluded services eligibility requirements as well. These
chemotherapy administration services, in this manner made it possible for us requirements date back to the original
radioisotope services, and customized to utilize a Program Memorandum as Medicare legislation (section 102(a) of
prosthetic devices), but ‘‘* * * also the vehicle for accomplishing routine the Social Security Amendments of
gives the Secretary the authority to updates of the excluded codes, in order 1965, Public Law 89–97), when the
designate additional, individual services to reflect any minor revisions that might Congress defined the intended scope of
for exclusion within each of the subsequently occur in the coding system this benefit. The SNF benefit was never
specified service categories.’’ In that itself (for example, the assignment of a intended to cover long-term, relatively
proposed rule, we also noted that the different code number to the same low-level ‘‘custodial’’ care; rather, the
BBRA Conference report (H.R. Conf. service). Accordingly, for any new Congress envisioned this benefit more
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29099
narrowly, in terms of serving as a less meeting the requirement. We have of such a change, it is necessary not
expensive alternative to what would received occasional inquiries about the only to consider its effect on those
otherwise be the final, convalescent effect of this policy on those beneficiaries who might not otherwise
portion of an acute care stay of several beneficiaries who would be able to be able to meet the SNF benefit’s prior
days as an inpatient at a hospital. In satisfy the SNF benefit’s 3-day hospital qualifying hospital stay requirement,
order to target the SNF benefit more stay requirement only if time spent in but also to assess potential negative
effectively at the limited segment of the observation status immediately prior to consequences. Possible examples could
nursing home population that the the formal inpatient admission were include altering the nature of the SNF
benefit was actually designed to cover counted. These inquiries assert that in benefit in a manner that is inconsistent
(that is, those beneficiaries requiring a such situations, the care furnished with Congressional intent in
short-term, fairly intensive stay in a SNF during observation may be establishing this requirement, or
as a continuation of an acute hospital indistinguishable from the inpatient creating a ‘‘woodwork effect’’ of
stay of several days), the Congress care that follows the formal admission, unanticipated consequences, such as
established as a prerequisite for SNF so that the beneficiaries themselves routine placement of patients in
coverage a requirement that a often learn of the difference only after observation status prior to formal
beneficiary must first be a hospital they were transferred to the SNF and admission, even in situations where
inpatient for ‘‘not less than 3 failed to meet the SNF benefit’s prior observation is not appropriate.
consecutive days before his discharge hospital stay requirement. The inquirers In soliciting these comments,
from the hospital’’ (section 1861(i) of argue that it is unfair to deny SNF moreover, we wish to distinguish the
the Act). From the very inception of the coverage to such a beneficiary based possible use of observation time from
Medicare program, in determining the solely on what they characterize as a time spent in the hospital’s emergency
three-day inpatient requirement for mere recordkeeping convention on the room. Although both observation
purposes of triggering the SNF benefit, part of the hospital rather than a services and emergency room services
‘‘inpatient’’ status has been determined substantive change in the actual care are directed at patients who are
as commencing with ‘‘the calendar day that the beneficiary receives there. expected to spend only a short period of
of admission’’ to the hospital (see 20 We note that the current SNF benefit
time in that service area, they are in
CFR § 405.120 (1966)). The current policy (which counts only time
many other ways dissimilar. Other than
guidelines in the CMS Internet Online following the formal inpatient
for patients with scheduled admissions,
Manual (IOM) at Publication 100–02 admission to the hospital toward
meeting the qualifying hospital stay the emergency room generally serves as
(Medicare Benefit Policy Manual),
requirement) is based directly on the the hospital’s overall point of entry,
Chapter 8 (Coverage of Extended Care
applicable portion of the Medicare law irrespective of the degree of severity of
(SNF) Services Under Hospital
at section 1861(i) of the Act, which a particular patient’s condition; thus,
Insurance), § 20.1 (Three-Day Prior
defines the SNF benefit’s qualifying many hospital patients typically would
Hospitalization) reflect this
hospital stay as one in which the commence their hospital encounter by
determination.
More recently, it has been suggested beneficiary ‘‘* * * was an inpatient for spending at least some time initially in
that because of changes in hospital not less than 3 consecutive days * * *’’ the emergency room. However, the time
admission practices that have occurred (emphasis added). An inpatient is a in the emergency room is not
since the Congress enacted this person who has been admitted to a considered a substitute for or equivalent
provision in 1965, some patients who at hospital for bed occupancy for purposes to inpatient hospital care. Clearly, many
that time would have been a hospital of receiving inpatient hospital services visits to the ER are for treatment of
inpatient for at least 3 days are instead as defined in section 1861 of the Act. problems requiring no inpatient
now placed in observation status Moreover, although at the time that this hospitalization (for example, most
initially, before being formally admitted provision was enacted, the concept of wounds, broken or sprained limbs, or
as a hospital inpatient. Observation observation status itself was not yet minor respiratory illnesses) and often
status is a distinct service that is even envisioned, to date, the Congress patients come to the ER because their
discussed in the IOM in Publication has not chosen to amend section 1861(i) regular physician is unavailable.
100–02 (Medicare Benefit Policy of the Act specifically to reflect use of Situations involving observation status,
Manual), Chapter 6 (Hospital Services observation time as triggering the SNF however, tend to be relatively
Covered Under Part B), § 70.4 benefit. However, we are aware that infrequent compared to the care of all
(Outpatient Observation Services), in over time, practice and treatment of patients that present to the hospital (for
which a patient who needs more care observation time may have changed; example, excessive bleeding or
than can be provided in an emergency thus, the effect of not counting this complications during surgery
room is moved from the emergency observation time under the existing necessitating a longer-than-normal
room, placed in a hospital bed in the policy ultimately might be to restrict recovery period, or non-specific
appropriate hospital unit, and SNF coverage to a narrower segment of significant abdominal pain). Further, as
monitored by the unit nursing and the beneficiary population than the emergency room services typically
physician staff. We recognize that Congress originally intended. represent the patient’s initial medical
coverage of observation services under Accordingly, with regard to those encounter for new or worsening
the outpatient prospective payment beneficiaries whose formal admission to symptoms, such services focus on
system is connected to patients with the hospital as an inpatient is identifying, managing, and stabilizing
three specific diagnoses: chest pain, immediately preceded by time spent in the patient’s acute condition. By
asthma, and congestive heart failure. hospital observation status, we invite contrast, observation services are
However, as we noted previously, the comments on whether we should furnished to a patient for whom there is
longstanding policy interpretation of the consider the possibility of counting the already at least a working diagnosis, and
SNF benefit’s prior hospital stay time spent in observation status toward involve ongoing assessment and short-
requirement does not count hospital meeting the SNF benefit’s qualifying 3- term treatment that is specifically
observation time that immediately day hospital stay requirement. We note directed at that condition so that a
precedes an inpatient admission toward that in evaluating the potential impact subsequent determination about
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29100 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
hospital admission or discharge can be VII. Provisions of the Proposed Rule purposes of the RFA, approximately 53
made. (With respect to continuing In this proposed rule, we propose to percent of SNFs are considered small
assessment and treatment, observation make the following revision to the businesses according to the Small
services would appear to share some existing text of the regulations: Business Administration’s latest size
common elements with inpatient care, • We would revise the regulations at standards, with total revenues of $11.5
although the latter involves a condition § 424.20(e)(2), regarding the million or less in any 1 year (for further
that is expected to require care for a performance of SNF certifications and information, see 65 FR 69432,
significantly longer duration, and that recertifications by NPs and CNSs, to November 17, 2000). Individuals and
also may well require medical clarify the distinction between ‘‘direct’’ States are not included in the definition
intervention at a level of complexity and ‘‘indirect’’ employment of a small entity. In addition,
relationships. We would also make a approximately 29 percent of SNFs are
that does not occur on an outpatient
minor technical correction in the nonprofit organizations.
basis.) This proposed rule proposes to
definition of ‘‘HCPCS’’ that appears in
We recognize that, under section update the SNF PPS rates published in
§ 424.3.
1886(a) of the Act, the statute defines the FY 2005 update notice on July 30,
‘‘operating costs of inpatient hospital VIII. Collection of Information 2004 (69 FR 45775) and the associated
services’’ as including the costs of Requirements correction notices published on October
certain services furnished prior to a This document does not impose 7, 2004 (69 FR 60158), and December
patient’s admission to the hospital. That information collection and 30, 2004 (69 FR 78445).
is, the costs of certain services furnished recordkeeping requirements. In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act
prior to an individual’s admission as an Consequently, it need not be reviewed requires us to prepare a regulatory
inpatient are deemed by statute to be by the Office of Management and impact analysis if a rule may have a
Budget under the authority of the significant impact on the operations of
operating costs of inpatient hospital
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. a substantial number of small rural
services. However, it is worth noting
hospitals. This analysis must conform to
that section 1886(a) addresses costs, and IX. Regulatory Impact Analysis the provisions of section 603 of the
neither section 1886(a) nor section RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of
1861(i) provides that a patient be A. Overall Impact
the Act, we define a small rural hospital
deemed an inpatient during the time We have examined the impacts of this as a hospital that is located outside of
prior to admission for purposes of the 3- proposed rule as required by Executive a Metropolitan Statistical Area and has
day requirement for SNF coverage. Order 12866 (September 1993, fewer than 100 beds. We anticipate that
Moreover, the deeming requirement in Regulatory Planning and Review), the the impact on swing-bed facilities will
section 1886(a) and the 3-day Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA, be similar to the impact on rural
requirement for SNF coverage in section September 16, 1980, Pub. L. 96–354), hospital-based facilities, which benefit
1861(i) serve different purposes. The section 1102(b) of the Social Security from the case-mix refinement (see Table
deeming requirement in section 1886(a) Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform 12 below).
was intended to prevent hospitals from Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4), and Section 202 of the Unfunded
‘‘unbundling’’ services from the Executive Order 13132. Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
inpatient stay and inappropriately Executive Order 12866 (as amended requires that agencies assess anticipated
by Executive Order 13258, which costs and benefits before issuing any
seeking separate payment. See 59 FR
merely reassigns responsibility of rule that may result in expenditure in
1654, 1656 (Jan. 12, 1994). That
duties) directs agencies to assess all any 1 year by State, local, or tribal
consideration does not apply in the costs and benefits of available regulatory
context of SNF coverage. As discussed governments, in the aggregate, or by the
alternatives and, if regulation is private sector, of $110 million or more.
above, the purpose of the 3-day necessary, to select regulatory This proposed rule would not have a
inpatient stay requirement for SNF approaches that maximize net benefits substantial effect on the governments
coverage is to target SNF coverage to (including potential economic, mentioned, or on private sector costs.
individuals requiring a short-term, fairly environmental, public health and safety Executive Order 13132 establishes
intensive stay in a SNF as a effects, distributive impacts, and certain requirements that an agency
continuation of an acute hospital stay. equity). A regulatory impact analysis must meet when it promulgates a
The Congress chose to target SNF (RIA) must be prepared for major rules proposed rule that impose substantial
coverage to individuals who had been with economically significant effects direct requirement costs on State and
inpatients for at least 3 consecutive ($100 million or more in any 1 year). local governments, preempts State law,
days; the Congress could have chosen a This proposed rule is major, as defined or otherwise has Federalism
shorter time, or it could have specified in Title 5, United States Code, section implications. As stated above, this
that certain time before admission must 804(2), because we estimate the impact proposed rule would not have a
be counted for purposes of the 3-day to the Medicare program, and the substantial effect on State and local
requirement, but it did not. Given the annual effects to the overall economy, governments.
differences in statutory language and would be more than $100 million.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze B. Anticipated Effects
statutory purpose, we believe the
requirement in section 1886(a) of the options for regulatory relief of small This proposed rule sets forth updates
Act (to treat certain preadmission costs businesses. For purposes of the RFA, of the SNF PPS rates contained in the
as inpatient costs) is consistent with not small entities include small businesses, FY 2005 update notice (69 FR 45775),
nonprofit organizations, and and the associated correction notices (69
counting time spent in the hospital prior
government agencies. Most SNFs and FR 60158 and 69 FR 78445) and
to an individual’s inpatient admission
most other providers and suppliers are presents a refinement to the RUG–III
as inpatient time, for purposes of the 3- small entities, either by their nonprofit case-mix classification system to be
day requirement for SNF coverage under status or by having revenues of $11.5 incorporated into the Medicare SNF PPS
section 1861(i) of the Act. million or less in any 1 year. For effective January 1, 2006. As described
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29101
in Section II.B.4, providers would specified clinically complex RUGs (and effects on urban versus rural status by
continue to be paid under the current 44 6.7 percent for other, rehabilitation census region.
group RUG–III system from October 1, RUGs) would expire with the The second column in the table shows
2005 through December 31, 2005. implementation of the proposed case- the number of facilities in the impact
Beginning January 1, 2006, we propose mix refinements in the SNF PPS. As database.
that providers would be paid the explained in section II.B.3 of this
proposed new RUG–53 payment. proposed rule, section 511 of the MMA, The third column of the table shows
Based on the above, we estimate the which provides for a 128 percent the effect of the annual update to the
FY 2006 impact to be a net impact of $0 increase in the PPS per diem payment wage index. This represents the effect of
million on payments (this reflects a for any SNF resident with Acquired using the most recent wage data
$1.02 billion reduction from the Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), available. The total impact of this
expiration of temporary payment remains in effect. However, we have not change is zero percent; however, there
increases, offset by a $510 million provided a separate impact analysis for are distributional effects of the change.
increase from the proposed refined case- the MMA provision. Our latest estimates The fourth column of the table shows
mix classification system and a $510 indicate that there are less than 2,000 the effect of using the new OMB
million increase from the update to the beneficiaries who qualify for this add-on geographic designations based on
payment rates, as explained in greater payment. The impact to Medicare is CBSAs.
detail later in this section). The impact included in the ‘‘total’’ column of Table The fifth column of the table shows
analysis in Table 12 of this proposed 12. the effect of the elimination of the add-
rule represents the projected effects of In proposing to update the rates for
on for specified RUG groups. As
the proposed policy changes in the SNF FY 2006, we made a number of standard
expected, this results in a decrease in
PPS from FY 2005 to FY 2006. We annual revisions and clarifications
payments for all providers.
estimate the effects by estimating mentioned elsewhere in this proposed
payments while holding all other rule (for example, the update to the The sixth column of the table shows
payment variables constant. We use the wage and market basket indexes used the effect of the proposed refinements to
best data available, but we do not for adjusting the Federal rates). These the case-mix classification system. Table
attempt to predict behavioral responses revisions would increase payments to 12 shows that there is a positive three
to these changes, and we do not make SNFs by approximately $510 million. percent overall impact from the
adjustments for future changes in such The aggregate change in payments proposed case-mix refinements.
variables as days or case-mix. associated with this proposed rule is Distributional effects are noted for
We note that certain events may estimated to be $0 million for FY 2006. specific providers. For example,
combine to limit the scope or accuracy The decrease of $1.02 billion due to the hospital-based facilities are expected to
of our impact analysis, because such an elimination of the temporary add-ons as receive greater than a 5.6 percent
analysis is future-oriented and, thus, of January 1, 2006, together with the increase in payment, compared with
susceptible to forecasting errors due to additional payment due to the proposed freestanding facilities that show an
other changes in the forecasted impact refined case-mix classification system of increase in payments of between 2.4 and
time period. Some examples are newly- $510 million and the market basket 2.9 percent. Additionally, rural Census
legislated general Medicare program increase of $510 million, results in a net regions show increases in payments of
funding changes by the Congress, or change in payments of $0 million. There 3.4 percent.
changes specifically related to SNFs. In are two areas of change that produce The seventh column of the table
addition, changes to the Medicare this impact on SNFs: shows the effect of all of the changes on
program may continue to be made as a 1. The implementation of a refined the FY 2006 payments. As the market
result of the BBA, the BBRA, the BIPA, case-mix classification system under basket increase of 3.0 percentage points
the MMA, or new statutory provisions. section 1888(e)(4)(G)(i) of the Act and, is constant for all providers, it is not
Although these changes may not be consequently, the reduction of the shown individually; however, we note
specific to the SNF PPS, the nature of temporary 20 percent/6.7 percent add- that the ‘‘Total FY 2006 change’’ column
the Medicare program is such that the ons to the Federal rates for the specified does incorporate this increase. It is
changes may interact, and the RUG groups. projected that aggregate payments
complexity of the interaction of these 2. The total change in payments from
would not change in total, assuming
changes could make it difficult to FY 2005 levels to FY 2006 levels. This
facilities do not change their care
predict accurately the full scope of the includes all of the previously noted
delivery and billing practices in
impact upon SNFs. changes in addition to the effect of the
response.
In accordance with section update to the rates.
1888(e)(4)(E) of the Act, we are updating The impacts are shown in Table 12. As can be seen from this table, the
the payment rates for FY 2006. The The breakdown of the various categories combined effects of all of the changes
BBRA, BIPA, and MMA provided for of data in the table follows. would vary by specific types of
several temporary adjustments to the The first column shows the providers and by location. For example,
SNF PPS payment rates that together, breakdown of all SNFs by urban or rural though facilities in the rural South
using the most recent data available, status, hospital-based or freestanding Atlantic and rural Mountain region
accounted for an estimated $1.4 billion status, and census region. experience payment decreases of 2.3
per year in payments to the nursing The first row of figures in the first and 1.8 percent respectively, some
home industry. column describes the estimated effects providers such as the rural Pacific and
We note that in accordance with of the various changes on all facilities. rural New England show increases of
section 101(a) of the BBRA and section The next 6 rows show the effects on 4.1 and 2.6 percent respectively.
314 of the BIPA, the existing, temporary facilities split by hospital-based, Payment increases for facilities in the
increase in the per diem adjusted freestanding, urban, and rural Rural Pacific area of the country are the
payment rates of 20 percent for certain categories. The next 20 rows show the highest for any provider type.
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29102 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29103
rule. In addition, as noted previously, direct or indirect employment TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
we specifically solicit comments on the relationship with the facility but who is FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
economic impact of the payment working in collaboration with a CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
changes discussed in this proposed rule, physician. For purposes of this Continued
as well as their potential impact on section—
beneficiaries’ access to quality SNF care. (i) Collaboration means a process Urban Area
We considered other options intended whereby a nurse practitioner or clinical CBSA Wage
(Constituent
nurse specialist works with a doctor of Code Index
to help ensure more accurate allocation Counties)
of payments specifically with regard to medicine or osteopathy to deliver health
non-therapy ancillaries. One of these care services. The services are delivered Callahan County,
within the scope of the nurse’s TX.
options included moving the non-
Jones County, TX.
therapy ancillary costs used in professional expertise, with medical Taylor County, TX.
establishing the nursing case-mix direction and appropriate supervision as 10380 ....... Aguadilla-Isabela- 0.4743
component of the payment rates to a provided for in guidelines jointly San Sebastian,
separate, newly created ‘‘medically developed by the nurse and the PR.
ancillary’’ component (65 FR 19192, physician or other mechanisms defined Aguada Municipio,
April 10, 2000). In addition, we looked by Federal regulations and the law of PR.
at a number of possible models, both the State in which the services are Aguadilla Municipio,
performed. PR.
weighted and unweighted, for a new
(ii) A direct employment relationship Añasco Municipio,
non-therapy ancillary index (65 FR PR.
19248ff.). Finally, we also researched with the facility is one meeting the
Isabela Municipio,
the application of models such as common law test specified in 20 CFR PR.
Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) and 404.1005, 404.1007, and 404.1009. Lares Municipio, PR.
All Patient Refined DRGs (APR–DRGs). When this test is not met, the facility is Moca Municipio, PR.
However, at this stage in our analysis, considered to have an indirect Rincón Municipio,
none of these alternatives offered a employment relationship with any PR.
nurse practitioner or clinical nurse San Sebastian
significant improvement over the RUG–
specialist who performs nursing Municipio, PR.
53 model in accounting for the 10420 ....... Akron, OH ............... 0.8991
variability of non-therapy ancillary services for the facility under § 409.21 of
Portage County, OH.
costs. this subchapter (however, the Summit County, OH.
In accordance with the provisions of performance of only delegated 10500 ....... Albany, GA ............. 0.8636
Executive Order 12866, this regulation physician tasks under § 483.40(e) of this Baker County, GA.
was reviewed by the Office of chapter does not, in itself, establish the Dougherty County,
Management and Budget. existence of an indirect employment GA.
relationship). Lee County, GA.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 424 Terrell County, GA.
* * * * * Worth County, GA.
Emergency medical services, Health
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 10580 ....... Albany-Schenec- 0.8545
facilities, Health professions, Medicare. Program No. 93.773, Medicare-Hospital tady-Troy, NY.
For the reasons set forth in the Insurance Program; and No. 93.774, Albany County, NY.
preamble, the Centers for Medicare & Medicare-Supplementary Medical Insurance Rensselaer County,
Medicaid Services proposes to amend Program) NY.
42 CFR chapter IV as follows: Dated: March 31, 2005. Saratoga County,
Mark B. McClellan, NY.
PART 424—CONDITIONS FOR Schenectady Coun-
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & ty, NY.
MEDICARE PAYMENT Medicaid Services. Schoharie County,
1. The authority citation for part 424 Dated: May 13, 2005. NY.
continues to read as follows: Michael O. Leavitt, 10740 ....... Albuquerque, NM .... 0.9693
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Secretary. Bernalillo County,
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and NM.
1395hh).
VI. Addendum Sandoval County,
This section contains the tables NM.
Subpart A—General Provisions Torrance County,
referred to throughout the preamble to NM.
this proposed rule. Tables 8 ‘‘Proposed Valencia County,
§ 424.3 [Amended]
Wage Index For Urban Areas Based On NM.
2. In § 424.3, in the definition of CBSA Labor Market Areas,’’ Table 9 10780 ....... Alexandria, LA ........ 0.8041
‘‘HCPCS’’ remove the word ‘‘CMS’’ and ‘‘Proposed Wage Index Based On CBSA Grant Parish, LA.
add the word ‘‘Healthcare’’ in its place. Labor Market Areas For Rural Areas’’ Rapides Parish, LA.
and Table A ‘‘MSA/CBSA Crosswalk’’ 10900 ....... Allentown-Beth- 0.9828
Subpart B—Certification and Plan of lehem-Easton,
Treatment Requirements are presented below.
PA-NJ.
Warren County, NJ.
3. In § 424.20, paragraph (e)(2) is TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX Carbon County, PA.
revised to read as follows: FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON Lehigh County, PA.
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS Northampton Coun-
§ 424.20 Requirements for posthospital
ty, PA.
SNF care.
Urban Area 11020 ....... Altoona, PA ............. 0.8953
* * * * * CBSA Wage Blair County, PA.
(Constituent
(e) * * * Code Index 11100 ....... Amarillo, TX ............ 0.9166
Counties)
(2) A nurse practitioner or clinical Armstrong County,
nurse specialist, neither of whom has a 10180 ....... Abilene, TX ............. 0.7904 TX.
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29104 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
Continued Continued Continued
Urban Area Urban Area Urban Area
CBSA Wage CBSA Wage CBSA Wage
(Constituent (Constituent (Constituent
Code Index Code Index Code Index
Counties) Counties) Counties)
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29105
TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
Continued Continued Continued
Urban Area Urban Area Urban Area
CBSA Wage CBSA Wage CBSA Wage
(Constituent (Constituent (Constituent
Code Index Code Index Code Index
Counties) Counties) Counties)
Ada County, ID. Jones County, IA. 17140 ....... Cincinnati-Middle- 0.9623
Boise County, ID. Linn County, IA. town, OH-KY-IN.
Canyon County, ID. 16580 ....... Champaign-Urbana, 0.9604 Dearborn County, IN.
Gem County, ID. IL. Franklin County, IN.
Owyhee County, ID. Champaign County, Ohio County, IN.
14484 ....... Boston-Quincy, MA 1.1543 IL. Boone County, KY.
Norfolk County, MA. Ford County, IL. Bracken County, KY.
Plymouth County, Piatt County, IL. Campbell County,
MA. 16620 ....... Charleston, WV ...... 0.8428 KY.
Suffolk County, MA. Boone County, WV. Gallatin County, KY.
14500 ....... Boulder, CO ............ 0.9744 Clay County, WV. Grant County, KY.
Boulder County, CO. Kanawha County, Kenton County, KY.
14540 ....... Bowling Green, KY 0.8220 WV. Pendleton County,
Edmonson County, Lincoln County, WV. KY.
KY. Putnam County, WV. Brown County, OH.
Warren County, KY. 16700 ....... Charleston-North 0.9438 Butler County, OH.
14740 ....... Bremerton- 1.0686 Charleston, SC. Clermont County,
Silverdale, WA. Berkeley County, OH.
Kitsap County, WA. SC. Hamilton County,
14860 ....... Bridgeport-Stam- 1.2598 Charleston County, OH.
ford-Norwalk, CT. SC. Warren County, OH.
Fairfield County, CT. Dorchester County, 17300 ....... Clarksville, TN-KY .. 0.8292
15180 ....... Brownsville-Har- 0.9822 SC. Christian County,
lingen, TX. 16740 ....... Charlotte-Gastonia- 0.9760 KY.
Cameron County, Concord, NC-SC. Trigg County, KY.
TX. Anson County, NC. Montgomery Coun-
15260 ....... Brunswick, GA ........ 0.9320 Cabarrus County, ty, TN.
Brantley County, GA. NC. Stewart County, TN.
Glynn County, GA. Gaston County, NC. 17420 ....... Cleveland, TN ......... 0.8141
McIntosh County, Mecklenburg Coun- Bradley County, TN.
GA. ty, NC. Polk County, TN.
15380 ....... Buffalo-Niagara 0.8889 Union County, NC. 17460 ....... Cleveland-Elyria- 0.9204
Falls, NY. York County, SC. Mentor, OH.
Erie County, NY. 16820 ....... Charlottesville, VA .. 1.0234 Cuyahoga County,
Niagara County, NY. Albemarle County, OH.
15500 ....... Burlington, NC ........ 0.8914 VA. Geauga County, OH.
Alamance County, Fluvanna County, Lake County, OH.
NC. VA. Lorain County, OH.
15540 ....... Burlington-South 0.9446 Greene County, VA. Medina County, OH.
Burlington, VT. Nelson County, VA. 17660 ....... Coeur d’Alene, ID ... 0.9657
Chittenden County, Charlottesville City, Kootenai County, ID.
VT. VA. 17780 ....... College Station- 0.8909
Franklin County, VT. 16860 ....... Chattanooga, TN- 0.9098 Bryan, TX.
Grand Isle County, GA. Brazos County, TX.
VT. Catoosa County, GA. Burleson County,
15764 ....... Cambridge-Newton- 1.1084 Dade County, GA. TX.
Framingham, MA. Walker County, GA. Robertson County,
Middlesex County, Hamilton County, TX.
MA. TN. 17820 ....... Colorado Springs, 0.9478
15804 ....... Camden, NJ ............ 1.0528 Marion County, TN. CO.
Burlington County, Sequatchie County, El Paso County, CO.
NJ. TN. Teller County, CO.
Camden County, NJ. 16940 ....... Cheyenne, WY ....... 0.8784 17860 ....... Columbia, MO ......... 0.8354
Gloucester County, Laramie County, Boone County, MO.
NJ. WY. Howard County, MO.
15940 ....... Canton-Massillon, 0.8944 16974 ....... Chicago-Naperville- 1.0848 17900 ....... Columbia, SC ......... 0.9047
OH. Joliet, IL. Calhoun County, SC.
Carroll County, OH. Cook County, IL. Fairfield County, SC.
Stark County, OH. DeKalb County, IL. Kershaw County,
15980 ....... Cape Coral-Fort 0.9366 DuPage County, IL. SC.
Myers, FL. Grundy County, IL. Lexington County,
Lee County, FL. Kane County, IL. SC.
16180 ....... Carson City, NV ...... 1.0244 Kendall County, IL. Richland County,
16220 ....... Casper, WY ............ 0.9035 McHenry County, IL. SC.
Natrona County, WY. Will County, IL. Saluda County, SC.
16300 ....... Cedar Rapids, IA .... 0.8617 17020 ....... Chico, CA ............... 1.0522 17980 ....... Columbus, GA-AL ... 0.8568
Benton County, IA. Butte County, CA. Russell County, AL.
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29106 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
Continued Continued Continued
Urban Area Urban Area Urban Area
CBSA Wage CBSA Wage CBSA Wage
(Constituent (Constituent (Constituent
Code Index Code Index Code Index
Counties) Counties) Counties)
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29107
TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
Continued Continued Continued
Urban Area Urban Area Urban Area
CBSA Wage CBSA Wage CBSA Wage
(Constituent (Constituent (Constituent
Code Index Code Index Code Index
Counties) Counties) Counties)
22520 ....... Florence-Muscle 0.8280 24340 ....... Grand Rapids-Wyo- 0.9400 25540 ....... Hartford-West Hart- 1.1084
Shoals, AL. ming, MI. ford-East Hartford,
Colbert County, AL. Barry County, MI. CT.
Lauderdale County, Ionia County, MI. Hartford County, CT.
AL. Kent County, MI. Litchfield County,
22540 ....... Fond du Lac, WI ..... 0.9650 Newaygo County, CT.
Fond du Lac Coun- MI. Middlesex County,
ty, WI. 24500 ....... Great Falls, MT ....... 0.9061 CT.
22660 ....... Fort Collins- 1.0132 Cascade County, Tolland County, CT.
Loveland, CO. MT. 25620 ....... Hattiesburg, MS ...... 0.7609
Larimer County, CO. 24540 ....... Greeley, CO ............ 0.9580 Forrest County, MS.
22744 ....... Fort Lauderdale- 1.0442 Weld County, CO. Lamar County, MS.
Pompano Beach- 24580 ....... Green Bay, WI ........ 0.9452 Perry County, MS.
Deerfield Beach, Brown County, WI. 25860 ....... Hickory-Lenoir-Mor- 0.8922
FL. Kewaunee County, ganton, NC.
Broward County, FL. WI. Alexander County,
22900 ....... Fort Smith, AR-OK 0.8214 Oconto County, WI. NC.
Crawford County, 24660 ....... Greensboro-High 0.9113 Burke County, NC.
AR. Point, NC. Caldwell County,
Franklin County, AR. Guilford County, NC. NC.
Sebastian County, Randolph County, Catawba County,
AR. NC. NC.
Le Flore County, OK. Rockingham Coun- 25980 ....... Hinesville-Fort Stew- 0.9178
Sequoyah County, ty, NC. art, GA 1.
OK. 24780 ....... Greenville, NC ........ 0.9434 Liberty County, GA.
23020 ....... Fort Walton Beach- 0.8881 Greene County, NC. Long County, GA.
Crestview-Destin, 26100 ....... Holland-Grand 0.9064
Pitt County, NC.
FL. Haven, MI.
24860 ....... Greenville, SC ........ 1.0165
Okaloosa County, Ottawa County, MI.
Greenville County,
FL. 26180 ....... Honolulu, HI ............ 1.1208
SC.
23060 ....... Fort Wayne, IN ....... 0.9803 Honolulu County, HI.
Laurens County, SC.
Allen County, IN. 26300 ....... Hot Springs, AR ...... 0.9053
Pickens County, SC. Garland County, AR.
Wells County, IN.
25020 ....... Guayama, PR ......... 0.3184 26380 ....... Houma-Bayou 0.7902
Whitley County, IN.
Arroyo Municipio, Cane-Thibodaux,
23104 ....... Fort Worth-Arling- 0.9510
PR. LA.
ton, TX.
Johnson County, TX. Guayama Municipio, Lafourche Parish,
Parker County, TX. PR. LA.
Tarrant County, TX. Patillas Municipio, Terrebonne Parish,
Wise County, TX. PR. LA.
23420 ....... Fresno, CA ............. 1.0541 25060 ....... Gulfport-Biloxi, MS .. 0.8938 26420 ....... Houston-Baytown- 1.0005
Fresno County, CA. Hancock County, Sugar Land, TX.
23460 ....... Gadsden, AL ........... 0.7946 MS. Austin County, TX.
Etowah County, AL. Harrison County, Brazoria County, TX.
23540 ....... Gainesville, FL ........ 0.9474 MS. Chambers County,
Alachua County, FL. Stone County, MS. TX.
Gilchrist County, FL. 25180 ....... Hagerstown-Martins- 0.9499 Fort Bend County,
23580 ....... Gainesville, GA ....... 0.8883 burg, MD-WV. TX.
Hall County, GA. Washington County, Galveston County,
23844 ....... Gary, IN .................. 0.9369 MD. TX.
Jasper County, IN. Berkeley County, Harris County, TX.
Lake County, IN. WV. Liberty County, TX.
Newton County, IN. Morgan County, WV. Montgomery Coun-
Porter County, IN. 25260 ....... Hanford-Corcoran, 1.0046 ty, TX.
24020 ....... Glens Falls, NY ...... 0.8567 CA. San Jacinto County,
Warren County, NY. Kings County, CA. TX.
Washington County, 25420 ....... Harrisburg-Carlisle, 0.9322 Waller County, TX.
NY. PA. 26580 ....... Huntington-Ashland, 0.9486
24140 ....... Goldsboro, NC ........ 0.8784 Cumberland County, WV-KY-OH.
Wayne County, NC. PA. Boyd County, KY.
24220 ....... Grand Forks, ND- 1.1516 Dauphin County, PA. Greenup County,
MN. Perry County, PA. KY.
Polk County, MN. 25500 ....... Harrisonburg, VA .... 0.9098 Lawrence County,
Grand Forks Coun- Rockingham Coun- OH.
ty, ND. ty, VA. Cabell County, WV.
24300 ....... Grand Junction, CO 0.9560 Harrisonburg City, Wayne County, WV.
Mesa County, CO. VA. 26620 ....... Huntsville, AL .......... 0.9149
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29108 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
Continued Continued Continued
Urban Area Urban Area Urban Area
CBSA Wage CBSA Wage CBSA Wage
(Constituent (Constituent (Constituent
Code Index Code Index Code Index
Counties) Counties) Counties)
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29109
TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
Continued Continued Continued
Urban Area Urban Area Urban Area
CBSA Wage CBSA Wage CBSA Wage
(Constituent (Constituent (Constituent
Code Index Code Index Code Index
Counties) Counties) Counties)
30700 ....... Lincoln, NE ............. 1.0225 Dane County, WI. Ramsey County,
Lancaster County, Iowa County, WI. MN.
NE. 31700 ....... Manchester-Nashua, 1.0335 Scott County, MN.
Seward County, NE. NH. Sherburne County,
30780 ....... Little Rock-North Lit- 0.8756 Hillsborough Coun- MN.
tle Rock, AR. ty, NH. Washington County,
Faulkner County, Merrimack County, MN.
AR. NH. Wright County, MN.
Grant County, AR. 31900 ....... Mansfield, OH 1 ....... 0.8887 Pierce County, WI.
Lonoke County, AR. Richland County, St. Croix County, WI.
Perry County, AR. OH. 33540 ....... Missoula, MT .......... 0.9482
Pulaski County, AR. 32420 ....... Mayagüez, PR ........ 0.4017 Missoula County,
Saline County, AR. Hormigueros MT.
30860 ....... Logan, UT-ID .......... 0.9173 Municipio, PR. 33660 ....... Mobile, AL ............... 0.7895
Franklin County, ID. Mayagüez Mobile County, AL.
Cache County, UT. Municipio, PR. 33700 ....... Modesto, CA ........... 1.1804
30980 ....... Longview, TX .......... 0.8739 32580 ....... McAllen-Edinburg- 0.8943 Stanislaus County,
Gregg County, TX. Pharr, TX. CA.
Rusk County, TX. Hidalgo County, TX. 33740 ....... Monroe, LA ............. 0.8040
Upshur County, TX. 32780 ....... Medford, OR ........... 1.0235 Ouachita Parish, LA.
31020 ....... Longview, WA ......... 0.9523
Jackson County, OR. Union Parish, LA.
Cowlitz County, WA.
32820 ....... Memphis, TN-MS- 0.9341 33780 ....... Monroe, MI ............. 0.9478
31084 ....... Los Angeles-Long 1.1752
AR. Monroe County, MI.
Beach-Glendale,
Crittenden County, 33860 ....... Montgomery, AL ..... 0.8588
CA.
AR. Autauga County, AL.
Los Angeles Coun-
DeSoto County, MS. Elmore County, AL.
ty, CA.
Marshall County, Lowndes County,
31140 ....... Louisville, KY-IN ..... 0.9261
Clark County, IN. MS. AL.
Floyd County, IN. Tate County, MS. Montgomery Coun-
Harrison County, IN. Tunica County, MS. ty, AL.
Washington County, Fayette County, TN. 34060 ....... Morgantown, WV .... 0.8428
IN. Shelby County, TN. Monongalia County,
Bullitt County, KY. Tipton County, TN. WV.
Henry County, KY. 32900 ....... Merced, CA ............. 1.1120 Preston County, WV.
Jefferson County, Merced County, CA. 34100 ....... Morristown, TN ....... 0.8753
KY. 33124 ....... Miami-Miami Beach- 0.9759 Grainger County,
Meade County, KY. Kendall, FL. TN.
Nelson County, KY. Miami-Dade County, Hamblen County,
Oldham County, KY. FL. TN.
Shelby County, KY. 33140 ....... Michigan City-La 0.9409 Jefferson County,
Spencer County, KY. Porte, IN. TN.
Trimble County, KY. LaPorte County, IN. 34580 ....... Mount Vernon- 1.0465
31180 ....... Lubbock, TX ........... 0.8792 33260 ....... Midland, TX ............ 0.9523 Anacortes, WA.
Crosby County, TX. Midland County, TX. Skagit County, WA.
Lubbock County, TX. 33340 ....... Milwaukee- 1.0106 34620 ....... Muncie, IN .............. 0.8939
31340 ....... Lynchburg, VA ........ 0.8700 Waukesha-West Delaware County,
Amherst County, VA. Allis, WI. IN.
Appomattox County, Milwaukee County, 34740 ....... Muskegon-Norton 0.9673
VA. WI. Shores, MI.
Bedford County, VA. Ozaukee County, Muskegon County,
Campbell County, WI. MI.
VA. Washington County, 34820 ....... Myrtle Beach- 0.8873
Bedford City, VA. WI. Conway-North
Lynchburg City, VA. Waukesha County, Myrtle Beach, SC.
31420 ....... Macon, GA .............. 0.9453 WI. Horry County, SC.
Bibb County, GA. 33460 ....... Minneapolis-St. 1.1078 34900 ....... Napa, CA ................ 1.2656
Crawford County, Paul-Bloomington, Napa County, CA.
GA. MN-WI. 34940 ....... Naples-Marco Is- 1.0140
Jones County, GA. Anoka County, MN. land, FL.
Monroe County, GA. Carver County, MN. Collier County, FL.
Twiggs County, GA. Chisago County, 34980 ....... Nashville-David- 0.9769
31460 ....... Madera, CA ............ 0.8721 MN. son—
Madera County, CA. Dakota County, MN. Murfreesboro, TN.
31540 ....... Madison, WI ............ 1.0635 Hennepin County, Cannon County, TN.
Columbia County, MN. Cheatham County,
WI. Isanti County, MN. TN.
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29110 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
Continued Continued Continued
Urban Area Urban Area Urban Area
CBSA Wage CBSA Wage CBSA Wage
(Constituent (Constituent (Constituent
Code Index Code Index Code Index
Counties) Counties) Counties)
Davidson County, 35660 ....... Niles-Benton Har- 0.8888 37100 ....... Oxnard-Thousand 1.1613
TN. bor, MI. Oaks-Ventura, CA.
Dickson County, TN. Berrien County, MI. Ventura County, CA.
Hickman County, 35980 ....... Norwich-New Lon- 1.1356 37340 ....... Palm Bay-Mel- 0.9835
TN. don, CT. bourne-Titusville,
Macon County, TN. New London Coun- FL.
Robertson County, ty, CT. Brevard County, FL.
TN. 36084 ....... Oakland-Fremont- 1.5346 37460 ....... Panama City-Lynn 0.7989
Rutherford County, Hayward, CA. Haven, FL.
TN. Alameda County, Bay County, FL.
Smith County, TN. CA. 37620 ....... Parkersburg-Mari- 0.8278
Sumner County, TN. Contra Costa Coun- etta, WV-OH.
Trousdale County, ty, CA. Washington County,
TN. 36100 ....... Ocala, FL ................ 0.8934 OH.
Williamson County, Marion County, FL. Pleasants County,
TN. 36140 ....... Ocean City, NJ ....... 1.1022 WV.
Wilson County, TN. Cape May County, Wirt County, WV.
35004 ....... Nassau-Suffolk, NY 1.2760 NJ. Wood County, WV.
Nassau County, NY. 36220 ....... Odessa, TX ............. 0.9894 37700 ....... Pascagoula, MS ..... 0.8165
Suffolk County, NY. Ector County, TX. George County, MS.
35084 ....... Newark-Union, NJ- 1.2195 36260 ....... Ogden-Clearfield, 0.9038 Jackson County, MS.
PA. UT. 37860 ....... Pensacola-Ferry 0.8104
Essex County, NJ. Davis County, UT. Pass-Brent, FL.
Hunterdon County, Morgan County, UT. Escambia County,
NJ. Weber County, UT. FL.
36420 ....... Oklahoma City, OK 0.9040
Morris County, NJ. Santa Rosa County,
Canadian County,
Sussex County, NJ. FL.
OK.
Union County, NJ. 37900 ....... Peoria, IL ................ 0.8868
Cleveland County,
Pike County, PA. Marshall County, IL.
OK.
35300 ....... New Haven-Milford, 1.1702 Peoria County, IL.
Grady County, OK.
CT. Stark County, IL.
Lincoln County, OK.
New Haven County, Logan County, OK. Tazewell County, IL.
CT. McClain County, OK. Woodford County, IL.
35380 ....... New Orleans- 0.9005 Oklahoma County, 37964 ....... Philadelphia, PA ..... 1.1040
Metairie-Kenner, OK. Bucks County, PA.
LA. 36500 ....... Olympia, WA ........... 1.0938 Chester County, PA.
Jefferson Parish, LA. Thurston County, Delaware County,
Orleans Parish, LA. WA. PA.
Plaquemines Parish, 36540 ....... Omaha-Council 0.9569 Montgomery Coun-
LA. Bluffs, NE-IA. ty, PA.
St. Bernard Parish, Harrison County, IA. Philadelphia County,
LA. Mills County, IA. PA.
St. Charles Parish, Pottawattamie 38060 ....... Phoenix-Mesa- 1.0138
LA. County, IA. Scottsdale, AZ.
St. John the Baptist Cass County, NE. Maricopa County,
Parish, LA. Douglas County, NE. AZ.
St. Tammany Par- Sarpy County, NE. Pinal County, AZ.
ish, LA. Saunders County, 38220 ....... Pine Bluff, AR ......... 0.8689
35644 ....... New York-Wayne- 1.3185 NE. Cleveland County,
White Plains, NY- Washington County, AR.
NJ. NE. Jefferson County,
Bergen County, NJ. 36740 ....... Orlando, FL ............. 0.9459 AR.
Hudson County, NJ. Lake County, FL. Lincoln County, AR.
Passaic County, NJ. Orange County, FL. 38300 ....... Pittsburgh, PA ......... 0.8853
Bronx County, NY. Osceola County, FL. Allegheny County,
Kings County, NY. Seminole County, PA.
New York County, FL. Armstrong County,
NY. 36780 ....... Oshkosh-Neenah, 0.9192 PA.
Putnam County, NY. WI. Beaver County, PA.
Queens County, NY. Winnebago County, Butler County, PA.
Richmond County, WI. Fayette County, PA.
NY. 36980 ....... Owensboro, KY ...... 0.8789 Washington County,
Rockland County, Daviess County, KY. PA.
NY. Hancock County, Westmoreland
Westchester Coun- KY. County, PA.
ty, NY. McLean County, KY. 38340 ....... Pittsfield, MA ........... 1.0191
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29111
TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
Continued Continued Continued
Urban Area Urban Area Urban Area
CBSA Wage CBSA Wage CBSA Wage
(Constituent (Constituent (Constituent
Code Index Code Index Code Index
Counties) Counties) Counties)
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29112 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
Continued Continued Continued
Urban Area Urban Area Urban Area
CBSA Wage CBSA Wage CBSA Wage
(Constituent (Constituent (Constituent
Code Index Code Index Code Index
Counties) Counties) Counties)
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29113
TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
Continued Continued Continued
Urban Area Urban Area Urban Area
CBSA Wage CBSA Wage CBSA Wage
(Constituent (Constituent (Constituent
Code Index Code Index Code Index
Counties) Counties) Counties)
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29114 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX TABLE 8.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX
FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON
CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS— CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—
Continued Continued Continued
Urban Area Urban Area Urban Area
CBSA Wage CBSA Wage CBSA Wage
(Constituent (Constituent (Constituent
Code Index Code Index Code Index
Counties) Counties) Counties)
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29115
01000 ....... Autauga County, Alabama ........................................................................................ 5240 0.8588 0.8588 33860
01010 ....... Baldwin County, Alabama ......................................................................................... 5160 0.7866 0.7477 99901
01020 ....... Barbour County, Alabama ......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01030 ....... Bibb County, Alabama ............................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.8979 13820
01040 ....... Blount County, Alabama ............................................................................................ 1000 0.9021 0.8979 13820
01050 ....... Bullock County, Alabama .......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01060 ....... Butler County, Alabama ............................................................................................ 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01070 ....... Calhoun County, Alabama ........................................................................................ 0450 0.7659 0.7659 11500
01080 ....... Chambers County, Alabama ..................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01090 ....... Cherokee County, Alabama ...................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01100 ....... Chilton County, Alabama ........................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.8979 13820
01110 ....... Choctaw County, Alabama ........................................................................................ 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01120 ....... Clarke County, Alabama ........................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01130 ....... Clay County, Alabama ............................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01140 ....... Cleburne County, Alabama ....................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01150 ....... Coffee County, Alabama ........................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01160 ....... Colbert County, Alabama .......................................................................................... 2650 0.8280 0.8280 22520
01170 ....... Conecuh County, Alabama ....................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01180 ....... Coosa County, Alabama ........................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01190 ....... Covington County, Alabama ...................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01200 ....... Crenshaw County, Alabama ...................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01210 ....... Cullman County, Alabama ......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01220 ....... Dale County, Alabama .............................................................................................. 2180 0.7687 0.7477 99901
01230 ....... Dallas County, Alabama ............................................................................................ 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01240 ....... De Kalb County, Alabama ......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01250 ....... Elmore County, Alabama .......................................................................................... 5240 0.8588 0.8588 33860
01260 ....... Escambia County, Alabama ...................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01270 ....... Etowah County, Alabama .......................................................................................... 2880 0.7946 0.7946 23460
01280 ....... Fayette County, Alabama .......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01290 ....... Franklin County, Alabama ......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01300 ....... Geneva County, Alabama ......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7707 20020
01310 ....... Greene County, Alabama .......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.8721 46220
01320 ....... Hale County, Alabama .............................................................................................. 01 0.7463 0.8721 46220
01330 ....... Henry County, Alabama ............................................................................................ 01 0.7463 0.7707 20020
01340 ....... Houston County, Alabama ........................................................................................ 2180 0.7687 0.7707 20020
01350 ....... Jackson County, Alabama ......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01360 ....... Jefferson County, Alabama ....................................................................................... 1000 0.9021 0.8979 13820
01370 ....... Lamar County, Alabama ............................................................................................ 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01380 ....... Lauderdale County, Alabama .................................................................................... 2650 0.8280 0.8280 22520
01390 ....... Lawrence County, Alabama ...................................................................................... 2030 0.8478 0.8478 19460
01400 ....... Lee County, Alabama ................................................................................................ 0580 0.8108 0.8108 12220
01410 ....... Limestone County, Alabama ..................................................................................... 3440 0.9149 0.9149 26620
01420 ....... Lowndes County, Alabama ....................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.8588 33860
01430 ....... Macon County, Alabama ........................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01440 ....... Madison County, Alabama ........................................................................................ 3440 0.9149 0.9149 26620
01450 ....... Marengo County, Alabama ........................................................................................ 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01460 ....... Marion County, Alabama ........................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01470 ....... Marshall County, Alabama ........................................................................................ 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01480 ....... Mobile County, Alabama ........................................................................................... 5160 0.7866 0.7895 33660
01490 ....... Monroe County, Alabama .......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01500 ....... Montgomery County, Alabama .................................................................................. 5240 0.8588 0.8588 33860
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29116 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
01510 ....... Morgan County, Alabama .......................................................................................... 2030 0.8478 0.8478 19460
01520 ....... Perry County, Alabama ............................................................................................. 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01530 ....... Pickens County, Alabama ......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01540 ....... Pike County, Alabama ............................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01550 ....... Randolph County, Alabama ...................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01560 ....... Russell County, Alabama .......................................................................................... 1800 0.8568 0.8568 17980
01570 ....... St Clair County, Alabama .......................................................................................... 1000 0.9021 0.8979 13820
01580 ....... Shelby County, Alabama ........................................................................................... 1000 0.9021 0.8979 13820
01590 ....... Sumter County, Alabama .......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01600 ....... Talladega County, Alabama ...................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01610 ....... Tallapoosa County, Alabama .................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01620 ....... Tuscaloosa County, Alabama ................................................................................... 8600 0.8842 0.8721 46220
01630 ....... Walker County, Alabama ........................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.8979 13820
01640 ....... Washington County, Alabama ................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01650 ....... Wilcox County, Alabama ........................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
01660 ....... Winston County, Alabama ......................................................................................... 01 0.7463 0.7477 99901
02013 ....... Aleutians County East, Alaska .................................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02016 ....... Aleutians County West, Alaska ................................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02020 ....... Anchorage County, Alaska ........................................................................................ 0380 1.2022 1.2110 11260
02030 ....... Angoon County, Alaska ............................................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02040 ....... Barrow-North Slope County, Alaska ......................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02050 ....... Bethel County, Alaska ............................................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02060 ....... Bristol Bay Borough County, Alaska ......................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02068 ....... Denali County, Alaska ............................................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02070 ....... Bristol Bay County, Alaska ........................................................................................ 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02080 ....... Cordova-Mc Carthy County, Alaska .......................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02090 ....... Fairbanks County, Alaska ......................................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1419 21820
02100 ....... Haines County, Alaska .............................................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02110 ....... Juneau County, Alaska ............................................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02120 ....... Kenai-Cook Inlet County, Alaska .............................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02122 ....... Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska ............................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02130 ....... Ketchikan County, Alaska ......................................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02140 ....... Kobuk County, Alaska ............................................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02150 ....... Kodiak County, Alaska .............................................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02160 ....... Kuskokwin County, Alaska ........................................................................................ 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02164 ....... Lake and Peninsula Borough, Alaska ....................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02170 ....... Matanuska County, Alaska ........................................................................................ 02 1.1900 1.2110 11260
02180 ....... Nome County, Alaska ................................................................................................ 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02185 ....... North Slope Borough, Alaska .................................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02188 ....... Northwest Arctic Borough, Alaska ............................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02190 ....... Outer Ketchikan County, Alaska ............................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02200 ....... Prince Of Wales County, Alaska ............................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02201 ....... Prince of Wales-Outer Ketchikan Census Area, Alaska ........................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02210 ....... Seward County, Alaska ............................................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02220 ....... Sitka County, Alaska ................................................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02230 ....... Skagway-Yakutat County, Alaska ............................................................................. 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02231 ....... Skagway-Yakutat-Angoon Census Area, Alaska ...................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02232 ....... Skagway-Hoonah-Angoon Census Area, Alaska ...................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02240 ....... Southeast Fairbanks County, Alaska ........................................................................ 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02250 ....... Upper Yukon County, Alaska .................................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02260 ....... Valdz-Chitna-Whitier County, Alaska ........................................................................ 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02261 ....... Valdex-Cordove Census Area, Alaska ...................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02270 ....... Wade Hampton County, Alaska ................................................................................ 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02280 ....... Wrangell-Petersburg County, Alaska ........................................................................ 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02282 ....... Yakutat Borough, Alaska ........................................................................................... 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
02290 ....... Yukon-Koyukuk County, Alaska ................................................................................ 02 1.1900 1.1990 99902
03000 ....... Apache County, Arizona ............................................................................................ 03 0.9054 0.8777 99903
03010 ....... Cochise County, Arizona ........................................................................................... 03 0.9054 0.8777 99903
03020 ....... Coconino County, Arizona ......................................................................................... 2620 1.1857 1.2105 22380
03030 ....... Gila County, Arizona ................................................................................................. 03 0.9054 0.8777 99903
03040 ....... Graham County, Arizona ........................................................................................... 03 0.9054 0.8777 99903
03050 ....... Greenlee County, Arizona ......................................................................................... 03 0.9054 0.8777 99903
03055 ....... La Paz County, Arizona ............................................................................................ 03 0.9054 0.8777 99903
03060 ....... Maricopa County, Arizona ......................................................................................... 6200 1.0138 1.0138 38060
03070 ....... Mohave County, Arizona ........................................................................................... 4120 1.1166 0.8777 99903
03080 ....... Navajo County, Arizona ............................................................................................. 03 0.9054 0.8777 99903
03090 ....... Pima County, Arizona ................................................................................................ 8520 0.8987 0.8987 46060
03100 ....... Pinal County, Arizona ................................................................................................ 6200 1.0138 1.0138 38060
03110 ....... Santa Cruz County, Arizona ...................................................................................... 03 0.9054 0.8777 99903
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29117
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29118 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29119
06020 ....... Arapahoe County, Colorado ...................................................................................... 2080 1.0733 1.0733 19740
06030 ....... Archuleta County, Colorado ...................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06040 ....... Baca County, Colorado ............................................................................................. 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06050 ....... Bent County, Colorado .............................................................................................. 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06060 ....... Boulder County, Colorado ......................................................................................... 1125 0.9744 0.9744 14500
06070 ....... Chaffee County, Colorado ......................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06080 ....... Cheyenne County, Colorado ..................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06090 ....... Clear Creek County, Colorado .................................................................................. 06 0.9389 1.0733 19740
06100 ....... Conejos County, Colorado ........................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06110 ....... Costilla County, Colorado .......................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06120 ....... Crowley County, Colorado ........................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06130 ....... Custer County, Colorado ........................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06140 ....... Delta County, Colorado ............................................................................................. 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06150 ....... Denver County, Colorado .......................................................................................... 2080 1.0733 1.0733 19740
06160 ....... Dolores County, Colorado ......................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06170 ....... Douglas County, Colorado ........................................................................................ 2080 1.0733 1.0733 19740
06180 ....... Eagle County, Colorado ............................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06190 ....... Elbert County, Colorado ............................................................................................ 06 0.9389 1.0733 19740
06200 ....... El Paso County, Colorado ......................................................................................... 1720 0.9478 0.9478 17820
06210 ....... Fremont County, Colorado ........................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06220 ....... Garfield County, Colorado ......................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06230 ....... Gilpin County, Colorado ............................................................................................ 06 0.9389 1.0733 19740
06240 ....... Grand County, Colorado ........................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06250 ....... Gunnison County, Colorado ...................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06260 ....... Hinsdale County, Colorado ....................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06270 ....... Huerfano County, Colorado ....................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06280 ....... Jackson County, Colorado ........................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06290 ....... Jefferson County, Colorado ....................................................................................... 2080 1.0733 1.0733 19740
06300 ....... Kiowa County, Colorado ............................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06310 ....... Kit Carson County, Colorado .................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06320 ....... Lake County, Colorado .............................................................................................. 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06330 ....... La Plata County, Colorado ........................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06340 ....... Larimer County, Colorado ......................................................................................... 2670 1.0132 1.0132 22660
06350 ....... Las Animas County, Colorado .................................................................................. 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06360 ....... Lincoln County, Colorado .......................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06370 ....... Logan County, Colorado ........................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06380 ....... Mesa County, Colorado ............................................................................................. 2995 0.9560 0.9560 24300
06390 ....... Mineral County, Colorado .......................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06400 ....... Moffat County, Colorado ........................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06410 ....... Montezuma County, Colorado ................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06420 ....... Montrose County, Colorado ...................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06430 ....... Morgan County, Colorado ......................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06440 ....... Otero County, Colorado ............................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06450 ....... Ouray County, Colorado ............................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06460 ....... Park County, Colorado .............................................................................................. 06 0.9389 1.0733 19740
06470 ....... Phillips County, Colorado .......................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06480 ....... Pitkin County, Colorado ............................................................................................. 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06490 ....... Prowers County, Colorado ........................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06500 ....... Pueblo County, Colorado .......................................................................................... 6560 0.8632 0.8632 39380
06510 ....... Rio Blanco County, Colorado .................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06520 ....... Rio Grande County, Colorado ................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06530 ....... Routt County, Colorado ............................................................................................. 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06540 ....... Saguache County, Colorado ..................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06550 ....... San Juan County, Colorado ...................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06560 ....... San Miguel County, Colorado ................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06570 ....... Sedgwick County, Colorado ...................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06580 ....... Summit County, Colorado ......................................................................................... 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06590 ....... Teller County, Colorado ............................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9478 17820
06600 ....... Washington County, Colorado .................................................................................. 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06610 ....... Weld County, Colorado ............................................................................................. 3060 0.9580 0.9580 24540
06620 ....... Yuma County, Colorado ............................................................................................ 06 0.9389 0.9389 99906
06630 ....... Broomfield County, Colorado .................................................................................... 2080 1.0733 1.0733 19740
07000 ....... Fairfield County, Connecticut .................................................................................... 5483 1.2096 1.2598 14860
07010 ....... Hartford County, Connecticut .................................................................................... 3283 1.1084 1.1084 25540
07020 ....... Litchfield County, Connecticut ................................................................................... 3283 1.1084 1.1084 25540
07030 ....... Middlesex County, Connecticut ................................................................................. 3283 1.1084 1.1084 25540
07040 ....... New Haven County, Connecticut .............................................................................. 5483 1.2096 1.1702 35300
07050 ....... New London County, Connecticut ............................................................................. 5523 1.1356 1.1356 35980
07060 ....... Tolland County, Connecticut ..................................................................................... 3283 1.1084 1.1084 25540
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29120 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29121
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29122 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
11530 ....... Gwinnett County, Georgia ......................................................................................... 0520 0.9648 0.9648 12060
11540 ....... Habersham County, Georgia ..................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11550 ....... Hall County, Georgia ................................................................................................. 11 0.8165 0.8883 23580
11560 ....... Hancock County, Georgia ......................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11570 ....... Haralson County, Georgia ......................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.9648 12060
11580 ....... Harris County, Georgia .............................................................................................. 1800 0.8568 0.8568 17980
11581 ....... Hart County, Georgia ................................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11590 ....... Heard County, Georgia ............................................................................................. 11 0.8165 0.9648 12060
11591 ....... Henry County, Georgia .............................................................................................. 0520 0.9648 0.9648 12060
11600 ....... Houston County, Georgia .......................................................................................... 4680 0.9286 0.8654 47580
11601 ....... Irwin County, Georgia ................................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11610 ....... Jackson County, Georgia .......................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11611 ....... Jasper County, Georgia ............................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.9648 12060
11612 ....... Jeff Davis County, Georgia ....................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11620 ....... Jefferson County, Georgia ........................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11630 ....... Jenkins County, Georgia ........................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11640 ....... Johnson County, Georgia .......................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11650 ....... Jones County, Georgia .............................................................................................. 4680 0.9286 0.9453 31420
11651 ....... Lamar County, Georgia ............................................................................................. 11 0.8165 0.9648 12060
11652 ....... Lanier County, Georgia ............................................................................................. 11 0.8165 0.8875 46660
11660 ....... Laurens County, Georgia .......................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11670 ....... Lee County, Georgia ................................................................................................. 0120 0.8636 0.8636 10500
11680 ....... Liberty County, Georgia ............................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.9178 25980
11690 ....... Lincoln County, Georgia ............................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11691 ....... Long County, Georgia ............................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.9178 25980
11700 ....... Lowndes County, Georgia ......................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.8875 46660
11701 ....... Lumpkin County, Georgia .......................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11702 ....... Mc Duffie County, Georgia ........................................................................................ 0600 0.9619 0.9565 12260
11703 ....... Mc Intosh County, Georgia ....................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.9320 15260
11710 ....... Macon County, Georgia ............................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11720 ....... Madison County, Georgia .......................................................................................... 0500 0.9843 0.9843 12020
11730 ....... Marion County, Georgia ............................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.8568 17980
11740 ....... Meriwether County, Georgia ..................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.9648 12060
11741 ....... Miller County, Georgia ............................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11750 ....... Mitchell County, Georgia ........................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11760 ....... Monroe County, Georgia ........................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.9453 31420
11770 ....... Montgomery County, Georgia ................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11771 ....... Morgan County, Georgia ........................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11772 ....... Murray County, Georgia ............................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.9044 19140
11780 ....... Muscogee County, Georgia ....................................................................................... 1800 0.8568 0.8568 17980
11790 ....... Newton County, Georgia ........................................................................................... 0520 0.9648 0.9648 12060
11800 ....... Oconee County, Georgia ........................................................................................... 0500 0.9843 0.9843 12020
11801 ....... Oglethorpe County, Georgia ..................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.9843 12020
11810 ....... Paulding County, Georgia ......................................................................................... 0520 0.9648 0.9648 12060
11811 ....... Peach County, Georgia ............................................................................................. 4680 0.9286 0.7666 99911
11812 ....... Pickens County, Georgia ........................................................................................... 0520 0.9648 0.9648 12060
11820 ....... Pierce County, Georgia ............................................................................................. 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11821 ....... Pike County, Georgia ................................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.9648 12060
11830 ....... Polk County, Georgia ................................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11831 ....... Pulaski County, Georgia ............................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11832 ....... Putnam County, Georgia ........................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11833 ....... Quitman County, Georgia .......................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11834 ....... Rabun County, Georgia ............................................................................................. 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11835 ....... Randolph County, Georgia ........................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11840 ....... Richmond County, Georgia ....................................................................................... 0600 0.9619 0.9565 12260
11841 ....... Rockdale County, Georgia ........................................................................................ 0520 0.9648 0.9648 12060
11842 ....... Schley County, Georgia ............................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11850 ....... Screven County, Georgia .......................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11851 ....... Seminole County, Georgia ........................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11860 ....... Spalding County, Georgia ......................................................................................... 0520 0.9648 0.9648 12060
11861 ....... Stephens County, Georgia ........................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11862 ....... Stewart County, Georgia ........................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11870 ....... Sumter County, Georgia ............................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11880 ....... Talbot County, Georgia ............................................................................................. 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11881 ....... Taliaferro County, Georgia ........................................................................................ 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11882 ....... Tattnall County, Georgia ........................................................................................... 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11883 ....... Taylor County, Georgia ............................................................................................. 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11884 ....... Telfair County, Georgia ............................................................................................. 11 0.8165 0.7666 99911
11885 ....... Terrell County, Georgia ............................................................................................. 11 0.8165 0.8636 10500
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29123
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29124 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29125
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29126 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29127
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29128 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29129
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29130 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29131
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29132 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29133
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29134 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29135
24360 ....... Lac Qui Parle County, Minnesota ............................................................................. 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24370 ....... Lake County, Minnesota ............................................................................................ 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24380 ....... Lake Of Woods County, Minnesota .......................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24390 ....... Le Sueur County, Minnesota ..................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24400 ....... Lincoln County, Minnesota ........................................................................................ 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24410 ....... Lyon County, Minnesota ............................................................................................ 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24420 ....... Mc Leod County, Minnesota ..................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24430 ....... Mahnomen County, Minnesota ................................................................................. 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24440 ....... Marshall County, Minnesota ...................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24450 ....... Martin County, Minnesota ......................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24460 ....... Meeker County, Minnesota ....................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24470 ....... Mille Lacs County, Minnesota ................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24480 ....... Morrison County, Minnesota ..................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24490 ....... Mower County, Minnesota ......................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24500 ....... Murray County, Minnesota ........................................................................................ 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24510 ....... Nicollet County, Minnesota ........................................................................................ 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24520 ....... Nobles County, Minnesota ........................................................................................ 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24530 ....... Norman County, Minnesota ....................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24540 ....... Olmsted County, Minnesota ...................................................................................... 6820 1.1142 1.1142 40340
24550 ....... Otter Tail County, Minnesota .................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24560 ....... Pennington County, Minnesota ................................................................................. 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24570 ....... Pine County, Minnesota ............................................................................................ 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24580 ....... Pipestone County, Minnesota ................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24590 ....... Polk County, Minnesota ............................................................................................ 2985 1.1516 1.1516 24220
24600 ....... Pope County, Minnesota ........................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24610 ....... Ramsey County, Minnesota ...................................................................................... 5120 1.1078 1.1078 33460
24620 ....... Red Lake County, Minnesota .................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24630 ....... Redwood County, Minnesota .................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24640 ....... Renville County, Minnesota ....................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24650 ....... Rice County, Minnesota ............................................................................................ 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24660 ....... Rock County, Minnesota ........................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24670 ....... Roseau County, Minnesota ....................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24680 ....... St Louis County, Minnesota ...................................................................................... 2240 1.0223 1.0209 20260
24690 ....... Scott County, Minnesota ........................................................................................... 5120 1.1078 1.1078 33460
24700 ....... Sherburne County, Minnesota ................................................................................... 5120 1.1078 1.1078 33460
24710 ....... Sibley County, Minnesota .......................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24720 ....... Stearns County, Minnesota ....................................................................................... 6980 0.9975 0.9975 41060
24730 ....... Steele County, Minnesota ......................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24740 ....... Stevens County, Minnesota ...................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24750 ....... Swift County, Minnesota ............................................................................................ 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24760 ....... Todd County, Minnesota ........................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24770 ....... Traverse County, Minnesota ..................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24780 ....... Wabasha County, Minnesota .................................................................................... 24 0.9193 1.1142 40340
24790 ....... Wadena County, Minnesota ...................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24800 ....... Waseca County, Minnesota ...................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24810 ....... Washington County, Minnesota ................................................................................ 5120 1.1078 1.1078 33460
24820 ....... Watonwan County, Minnesota .................................................................................. 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24830 ....... Wilkin County, Minnesota .......................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24840 ....... Winona County, Minnesota ....................................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
24850 ....... Wright County, Minnesota ......................................................................................... 5120 1.1078 1.1078 33460
24860 ....... Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota ......................................................................... 24 0.9193 0.9183 99924
25000 ....... Adams County, Mississippi ....................................................................................... 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25010 ....... Alcorn County, Mississippi ........................................................................................ 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25020 ....... Amite County, Mississippi ......................................................................................... 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25030 ....... Attala County, Mississippi ......................................................................................... 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25040 ....... Benton County, Mississippi ....................................................................................... 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25050 ....... Bolivar County, Mississippi ........................................................................................ 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25060 ....... Calhoun County, Mississippi ..................................................................................... 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25070 ....... Carroll County, Mississippi ........................................................................................ 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25080 ....... Chickasaw County, Mississippi ................................................................................. 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25090 ....... Choctaw County, Mississippi ..................................................................................... 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25100 ....... Claiborne County, Mississippi ................................................................................... 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25110 ....... Clarke County, Mississippi ........................................................................................ 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25120 ....... Clay County, Mississippi ........................................................................................... 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25130 ....... Coahoma County, Mississippi ................................................................................... 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25140 ....... Copiah County, Mississippi ....................................................................................... 25 0.7631 0.8319 27140
25150 ....... Covington County, Mississippi .................................................................................. 25 0.7631 0.7671 99925
25160 ....... Desoto County, Mississippi ....................................................................................... 4920 0.9360 0.9341 32820
25170 ....... Forrest County, Mississippi ....................................................................................... 3285 0.7609 0.7609 25620
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29136 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29137
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29138 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29139
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29140 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29141
29160 ....... White Pine County, Nevada ...................................................................................... 29 0.9697 0.9074 99929
30000 ....... Belknap County, New Hampshire ............................................................................. 30 1.0677 1.0677 99930
30010 ....... Carroll County, New Hampshire ................................................................................ 30 1.0677 1.0677 99930
30020 ....... Cheshire County, New Hampshire ............................................................................ 30 1.0677 1.0677 99930
30030 ....... Coos County, New Hampshire .................................................................................. 30 1.0677 1.0677 99930
30040 ....... Grafton County, New Hampshire .............................................................................. 30 1.0677 1.0677 99930
30050 ....... Hillsboro County, New Hampshire ............................................................................ 1123 1.1152 1.0335 31700
30060 ....... Merrimack County, New Hampshire ......................................................................... 1123 1.1152 1.0335 31700
30070 ....... Rockingham County, New Hampshire ...................................................................... 1123 1.1152 1.0385 40484
30080 ....... Strafford County, New Hampshire ............................................................................ 1123 1.1152 1.0385 40484
30090 ....... Sullivan County, New Hampshire .............................................................................. 30 1.0677 1.0677 99930
31000 ....... Atlantic County, New Jersey ..................................................................................... 0560 1.1513 1.1633 12100
31100 ....... Bergen County, New Jersey ..................................................................................... 0875 1.1660 1.3185 35644
31150 ....... Burlington County, New Jersey ................................................................................. 6160 1.0926 1.0528 15804
31160 ....... Camden County, New Jersey ................................................................................... 6160 1.0926 1.0528 15804
31180 ....... Cape May County, New Jersey ................................................................................ 0560 1.1513 1.1022 36140
31190 ....... Cumberland County, New Jersey ............................................................................. 8760 0.9837 0.9837 47220
31200 ....... Essex County, New Jersey ....................................................................................... 5640 1.2141 1.2195 35084
31220 ....... Gloucester County, New Jersey ................................................................................ 6160 1.0926 1.0528 15804
31230 ....... Hudson County, New Jersey ..................................................................................... 3640 1.1349 1.3185 35644
31250 ....... Hunterdon County, New Jersey ................................................................................ 5015 1.1178 1.2195 35084
31260 ....... Mercer County, New Jersey ...................................................................................... 8480 1.0845 1.0845 45940
31270 ....... Middlesex County, New Jersey ................................................................................. 5015 1.1178 1.1260 20764
31290 ....... Monmouth County, New Jersey ................................................................................ 5190 1.1271 1.1260 20764
31300 ....... Morris County, New Jersey ....................................................................................... 5640 1.2141 1.2195 35084
31310 ....... Ocean County, New Jersey ...................................................................................... 5190 1.1271 1.1260 20764
31320 ....... Passaic County, New Jersey .................................................................................... 0875 1.1660 1.3185 35644
31340 ....... Salem County, New Jersey ....................................................................................... 6160 1.0926 1.0482 48864
31350 ....... Somerset County, New Jersey .................................................................................. 5015 1.1178 1.1260 20764
31360 ....... Sussex County, New Jersey ..................................................................................... 5640 1.2141 1.2195 35084
31370 ....... Union County, New Jersey ........................................................................................ 5640 1.2141 1.2195 35084
31390 ....... Warren County, New Jersey ..................................................................................... 5640 1.2141 0.9828 10900
32000 ....... Bernalillo County, New Mexico ................................................................................. 0200 0.9693 0.9693 10740
32010 ....... Catron County, New Mexico ..................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32020 ....... Chaves County, New Mexico .................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32025 ....... Cibola County, New Mexico ...................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32030 ....... Colfax County, New Mexico ...................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32040 ....... Curry County, New Mexico ....................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32050 ....... De Baca County, New Mexico .................................................................................. 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32060 ....... Dona Ana County, New Mexico ................................................................................ 4100 0.8475 0.8475 29740
32070 ....... Eddy County, New Mexico ........................................................................................ 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32080 ....... Grant County, New Mexico ....................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32090 ....... Guadalupe County, New Mexico ............................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32100 ....... Harding County, New Mexico .................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32110 ....... Hidalgo County, New Mexico .................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32120 ....... Lea County, New Mexico .......................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32130 ....... Lincoln County, New Mexico ..................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32131 ....... Los Alamos County, New Mexico ............................................................................. 7490 1.0759 0.8644 99932
32140 ....... Luna County, New Mexico ........................................................................................ 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32150 ....... Mc Kinley County, New Mexico ................................................................................ 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32160 ....... Mora County, New Mexico ........................................................................................ 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32170 ....... Otero County, New Mexico ....................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32180 ....... Quay County, New Mexico ........................................................................................ 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32190 ....... Rio Arriba County, New Mexico ................................................................................ 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32200 ....... Roosevelt County, New Mexico ................................................................................ 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32210 ....... Sandoval County, New Mexico ................................................................................. 0200 0.9693 0.9693 10740
32220 ....... San Juan County, New Mexico ................................................................................. 32 0.8571 0.8518 22140
32230 ....... San Miguel County, New Mexico .............................................................................. 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32240 ....... Santa Fe County, New Mexico ................................................................................. 7490 1.0759 1.0931 42140
32250 ....... Sierra County, New Mexico ....................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32260 ....... Socorro County, New Mexico .................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32270 ....... Taos County, New Mexico ........................................................................................ 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32280 ....... Torrance County, New Mexico .................................................................................. 32 0.8571 0.9693 10740
32290 ....... Union County, New Mexico ....................................................................................... 32 0.8571 0.8644 99932
32300 ....... Valencia County, New Mexico .................................................................................. 0200 0.9693 0.9693 10740
33000 ....... Albany County, New York ......................................................................................... 0160 0.8518 0.8545 10580
33010 ....... Allegany County, New York ...................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33020 ....... Bronx County, New York ........................................................................................... 5600 1.3465 1.3185 35644
33030 ....... Broome County, New York ........................................................................................ 0960 0.8571 0.8571 13780
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29142 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
33040 ....... Cattaraugus County, New York ................................................................................. 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33050 ....... Cayuga County, New York ........................................................................................ 8160 0.9499 0.8157 99933
33060 ....... Chautauqua County, New York ................................................................................. 3610 0.7552 0.8157 99933
33070 ....... Chemung County, New York ..................................................................................... 2335 0.8259 0.8259 21300
33080 ....... Chenango County, New York .................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33090 ....... Clinton County, New York ......................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33200 ....... Columbia County, New York ..................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33210 ....... Cortland County, New York ....................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33220 ....... Delaware County, New York ..................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33230 ....... Dutchess County, New York ..................................................................................... 2281 1.0183 1.0766 39100
33240 ....... Erie County, New York .............................................................................................. 1280 0.8889 0.8889 15380
33260 ....... Essex County, New York .......................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33270 ....... Franklin County, New York ....................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33280 ....... Fulton County, New York .......................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33290 ....... Genesee County, New York ...................................................................................... 6840 0.9044 0.8157 99933
33300 ....... Greene County, New York ........................................................................................ 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33310 ....... Hamilton County, New York ...................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33320 ....... Herkimer County, New York ...................................................................................... 8680 0.8293 0.8293 46540
33330 ....... Jefferson County, New York ..................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33331 ....... Kings County, New York ........................................................................................... 5600 1.3465 1.3185 35644
33340 ....... Lewis County, New York ........................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33350 ....... Livingston County, New York .................................................................................... 6840 0.9044 0.9115 40380
33360 ....... Madison County, New York ....................................................................................... 8160 0.9499 0.9581 45060
33370 ....... Monroe County, New York ........................................................................................ 6840 0.9044 0.9115 40380
33380 ....... Montgomery County, New York ................................................................................ 0160 0.8518 0.8157 99933
33400 ....... Nassau County, New York ........................................................................................ 5380 1.2760 1.2760 35004
33420 ....... New York County, New York .................................................................................... 5600 1.3465 1.3185 35644
33500 ....... Niagara County, New York ........................................................................................ 1280 0.8889 0.8889 15380
33510 ....... Oneida County, New York ......................................................................................... 8680 0.8293 0.8293 46540
33520 ....... Onondaga County, New York ................................................................................... 8160 0.9499 0.9581 45060
33530 ....... Ontario County, New York ........................................................................................ 6840 0.9044 0.9115 40380
33540 ....... Orange County, New York ........................................................................................ 5660 1.1218 1.0766 39100
33550 ....... Orleans County, New York ........................................................................................ 6840 0.9044 0.9115 40380
33560 ....... Oswego County, New York ....................................................................................... 8160 0.9499 0.9581 45060
33570 ....... Otsego County, New York ......................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33580 ....... Putnam County, New York ........................................................................................ 5600 1.3465 1.3185 35644
33590 ....... Queens County, New York ........................................................................................ 5600 1.3465 1.3185 35644
33600 ....... Rensselaer County, New York .................................................................................. 0160 0.8518 0.8545 10580
33610 ....... Richmond County, New York .................................................................................... 5600 1.3465 1.3185 35644
33620 ....... Rockland County, New York ..................................................................................... 5600 1.3465 1.3185 35644
33630 ....... St Lawrence County, New York ................................................................................ 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33640 ....... Saratoga County, New York ...................................................................................... 0160 0.8518 0.8545 10580
33650 ....... Schenectady County, New York ............................................................................... 0160 0.8518 0.8545 10580
33660 ....... Schoharie County, New York .................................................................................... 0160 0.8518 0.8545 10580
33670 ....... Schuyler County, New York ...................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33680 ....... Seneca County, New York ........................................................................................ 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33690 ....... Steuben County, New York ....................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33700 ....... Suffolk County, New York ......................................................................................... 5380 1.2760 1.2760 35004
33710 ....... Sullivan County, New York ........................................................................................ 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33720 ....... Tioga County, New York ........................................................................................... 0960 0.8571 0.8571 13780
33730 ....... Tompkins County, New York ..................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.9803 27060
33740 ....... Ulster County, New York ........................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.9257 28740
33750 ....... Warren County, New York ........................................................................................ 2975 0.8567 0.8567 24020
33760 ....... Washington County, New York ................................................................................. 2975 0.8567 0.8567 24020
33770 ....... Wayne County, New York ......................................................................................... 6840 0.9044 0.9115 40380
33800 ....... Westchester County, New York ................................................................................ 5600 1.3465 1.3185 35644
33900 ....... Wyoming County, New York ..................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
33910 ....... Yates County, New York ........................................................................................... 33 0.8395 0.8157 99933
34000 ....... Alamance County, N Carolina ................................................................................... 3120 0.9027 0.8914 15500
34010 ....... Alexander County, N Carolina ................................................................................... 3290 0.8922 0.8922 25860
34020 ....... Alleghany County, N Carolina ................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34030 ....... Anson County, N Carolina ......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.9760 16740
34040 ....... Ashe County, N Carolina ........................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34050 ....... Avery County, N Carolina .......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34060 ....... Beaufort County, N Carolina ..................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34070 ....... Bertie County, N Carolina ......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34080 ....... Bladen County, N Carolina ........................................................................................ 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34090 ....... Brunswick County, N Carolina .................................................................................. 9200 0.9592 0.9592 48900
34100 ....... Buncombe County, N Carolina .................................................................................. 0480 0.9747 0.9294 11700
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29143
34110 ....... Burke County, N Carolina ......................................................................................... 3290 0.8922 0.8922 25860
34120 ....... Cabarrus County, N Carolina .................................................................................... 1520 0.9725 0.9760 16740
34130 ....... Caldwell County, N Carolina ..................................................................................... 3290 0.8922 0.8922 25860
34140 ....... Camden County, N Carolina ..................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34150 ....... Carteret County, N Carolina ...................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34160 ....... Caswell County, N Carolina ...................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34170 ....... Catawba County, N Carolina ..................................................................................... 3290 0.8922 0.8922 25860
34180 ....... Chatham County, N Carolina .................................................................................... 6640 1.0087 1.0303 20500
34190 ....... Cherokee County, N Carolina ................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34200 ....... Chowan County, N Carolina ...................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34210 ....... Clay County, N Carolina ............................................................................................ 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34220 ....... Cleveland County, N Carolina ................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34230 ....... Columbus County, N Carolina ................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34240 ....... Craven County, N Carolina ....................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34250 ....... Cumberland County, N Carolina ............................................................................... 2560 0.9426 0.9426 22180
34251 ....... Currituck County, N Carolina .................................................................................... 5720 0.8808 0.8808 47260
34270 ....... Dare County, N Carolina ........................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34280 ....... Davidson County, N Carolina .................................................................................... 3120 0.9027 0.8567 99934
34290 ....... Davie County, N Carolina .......................................................................................... 3120 0.9027 0.8953 49180
34300 ....... Duplin County, N Carolina ......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34310 ....... Durham County, N Carolina ...................................................................................... 6640 1.0087 1.0303 20500
34320 ....... Edgecombe County, N Carolina ................................................................................ 6895 0.8924 0.8924 40580
34330 ....... Forsyth County, N Carolina ....................................................................................... 3120 0.9027 0.8953 49180
34340 ....... Franklin County, N Carolina ...................................................................................... 6640 1.0087 0.9733 39580
34350 ....... Gaston County, N Carolina ....................................................................................... 1520 0.9725 0.9760 16740
34360 ....... Gates County, N Carolina ......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34370 ....... Graham County, N Carolina ...................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34380 ....... Granville County, N Carolina ..................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34390 ....... Greene County, N Carolina ....................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.9434 24780
34400 ....... Guilford County, N Carolina ...................................................................................... 3120 0.9027 0.9113 24660
34410 ....... Halifax County, N Carolina ........................................................................................ 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34420 ....... Harnett County, N Carolina ....................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34430 ....... Haywood County, N Carolina .................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.9294 11700
34440 ....... Henderson County, N Carolina ................................................................................. 34 0.8490 0.9294 11700
34450 ....... Hertford County, N Carolina ...................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34460 ....... Hoke County, N Carolina .......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.9426 22180
34470 ....... Hyde County, N Carolina .......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34480 ....... Iredell County, N Carolina ......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34490 ....... Jackson County, N Carolina ...................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34500 ....... Johnston County, N Carolina .................................................................................... 6640 1.0087 0.9733 39580
34510 ....... Jones County, N Carolina ......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34520 ....... Lee County, N Carolina ............................................................................................. 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34530 ....... Lenoir County, N Carolina ......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34540 ....... Lincoln County, N Carolina ....................................................................................... 1520 0.9725 0.8567 99934
34550 ....... Mc Dowell County, N Carolina .................................................................................. 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34560 ....... Macon County, N Carolina ........................................................................................ 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34570 ....... Madison County, N Carolina ..................................................................................... 0480 0.9747 0.9294 11700
34580 ....... Martin County, N Carolina ......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34590 ....... Mecklenburg County, N Carolina .............................................................................. 1520 0.9725 0.9760 16740
34600 ....... Mitchell County, N Carolina ....................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34610 ....... Montgomery County, N Carolina ............................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34620 ....... Moore County, N Carolina ......................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34630 ....... Nash County, N Carolina .......................................................................................... 6895 0.8924 0.8924 40580
34640 ....... New Hanover County, N Carolina ............................................................................. 9200 0.9592 0.9592 48900
34650 ....... Northampton County, N Carolina .............................................................................. 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34660 ....... Onslow County, N Carolina ....................................................................................... 3605 0.8244 0.8244 27340
34670 ....... Orange County, N Carolina ....................................................................................... 6640 1.0087 1.0303 20500
34680 ....... Pamlico County, N Carolina ...................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34690 ....... Pasquotank County, N Carolina ................................................................................ 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34700 ....... Pender County, N Carolina ....................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.9592 48900
34710 ....... Perquimans County, N Carolina ................................................................................ 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34720 ....... Person County, N Carolina ....................................................................................... 34 0.8490 1.0303 20500
34730 ....... Pitt County, N Carolina .............................................................................................. 3150 0.9434 0.9434 24780
34740 ....... Polk County, N Carolina ............................................................................................ 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34750 ....... Randolph County, N Carolina ................................................................................... 3120 0.9027 0.9113 24660
34760 ....... Richmond County, N Carolina ................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34770 ....... Robeson County, N Carolina .................................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.8567 99934
34780 ....... Rockingham County, N Carolina ............................................................................... 34 0.8490 0.9113 24660
34790 ....... Rowan County, N Carolina ........................................................................................ 1520 0.9725 0.8567 99934
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29144 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29145
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29146 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29147
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29148 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29149
40050 ....... Aibonito County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4686 41980
40060 ....... Anasco County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 4840 0.4246 0.4743 10380
40070 ....... Arecibo County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 0470 0.4116 0.4686 41980
40080 ....... Arroyo County, Puerto Rico ...................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.3184 25020
40090 ....... Barceloneta County, Puerto Rico .............................................................................. 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40100 ....... Barranquitas County, Puerto Rico ............................................................................. 40 0.3608 0.4686 41980
40110 ....... Bayamon County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................. 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40120 ....... Cabo Rojo County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................ 4840 0.4246 0.4655 41900
40130 ....... Caguas County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 1310 0.4020 0.4686 41980
40140 ....... Camuy County, Puerto Rico ...................................................................................... 0470 0.4116 0.4686 41980
40145 ....... Canovanas County, Puerto Rico ............................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40150 ....... Carolina County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40160 ....... Catano County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40170 ....... Cayey County, Puerto Rico ....................................................................................... 1310 0.4020 0.4686 41980
40180 ....... Ceiba County, Puerto Rico ........................................................................................ 7440 0.4855 0.4157 21940
40190 ....... Ciales County, Puerto Rico ....................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4686 41980
40200 ....... Cidra County, Puerto Rico ........................................................................................ 1310 0.4020 0.4686 41980
40210 ....... Coamo County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4047 99940
40220 ....... Comerio County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40230 ....... Corozal County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40240 ....... Culebra County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4047 99940
40250 ....... Dorado County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40260 ....... Fajardo County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4157 21940
40265 ....... Florida County, Puerto Rico ...................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40270 ....... Guanica County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4413 49500
40280 ....... Guayama County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................. 40 0.3608 0.3184 25020
40290 ....... Guayanilla County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................ 6360 0.5091 0.4413 49500
40300 ....... Guaynabo County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................ 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40310 ....... Gurabo County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 1310 0.4020 0.4686 41980
40320 ....... Hatillo County, Puerto Rico ....................................................................................... 0470 0.4116 0.4686 41980
40330 ....... Hormigueros County, Puerto Rico ............................................................................ 4840 0.4246 0.4017 32420
40340 ....... Humacao County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................. 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40350 ....... Isabela County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4743 10380
40360 ....... Jayuya County, Puerto Rico ...................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4047 99940
40370 ....... Juana Diaz County, Puerto Rico ............................................................................... 6360 0.5091 0.5177 38660
40380 ....... Juncos County, Puerto Rico ...................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40390 ....... Lajas County, Puerto Rico ........................................................................................ 40 0.3608 0.4655 41900
40400 ....... Lares County, Puerto Rico ........................................................................................ 40 0.3608 0.4743 10380
40410 ....... Las Marias County, Puerto Rico ............................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4047 99940
40420 ....... Las Piedras County, Puerto Rico .............................................................................. 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40430 ....... Loiza County, Puerto Rico ........................................................................................ 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40440 ....... Luquillo County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4157 21940
40450 ....... Manati County, Puerto Rico ...................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40460 ....... Maricao County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4047 99940
40470 ....... Maunabo County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................. 40 0.3608 0.4686 41980
40480 ....... Mayaguez County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................ 4840 0.4246 0.4017 32420
40490 ....... Moca County, Puerto Rico ........................................................................................ 0060 0.4881 0.4743 10380
40500 ....... Morovis County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40510 ....... Naguabo County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................. 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40520 ....... Naranjito County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40530 ....... Orocovis County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4686 41980
40540 ....... Patillas County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.3184 25020
40550 ....... Penuelas County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................. 6360 0.5091 0.4413 49500
40560 ....... Ponce County, Puerto Rico ....................................................................................... 6360 0.5091 0.5177 38660
40570 ....... Quebradillas County, Puerto Rico ............................................................................. 40 0.3608 0.4686 41980
40580 ....... Rincon County, Puerto Rico ...................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4743 10380
40590 ....... Rio Grande County, Puerto Rico .............................................................................. 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40610 ....... Sabana Grande County, Puerto Rico ....................................................................... 4840 0.4246 0.4655 41900
40620 ....... Salinas County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4047 99940
40630 ....... San German County, Puerto Rico ............................................................................ 4840 0.4246 0.4655 41900
40640 ....... San Juan County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................. 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40650 ....... San Lorenzo County, Puerto Rico ............................................................................ 1310 0.4020 0.4686 41980
40660 ....... San Sebastian County, Puerto Rico ......................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4743 10380
40670 ....... Santa Isabel County, Puerto Rico ............................................................................. 40 0.3608 0.4047 99940
40680 ....... Toa Alta County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40690 ....... Toa Baja County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................. 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40700 ....... Trujillo Alto County, Puerto Rico ............................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40710 ....... Utuado County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4047 99940
40720 ....... Vega Alta County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................. 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29150 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
40730 ....... Vega Baja County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................ 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40740 ....... Vieques County, Puerto Rico .................................................................................... 40 0.3608 0.4047 99940
40750 ....... Villalba County, Puerto Rico ..................................................................................... 6360 0.5091 0.5177 38660
40760 ....... Yabucoa County, Puerto Rico ................................................................................... 7440 0.4855 0.4686 41980
40770 ....... Yauco County, Puerto Rico ....................................................................................... 6360 0.5091 0.4413 49500
41000 ....... Bristol County, Rhode Island ..................................................................................... 6483 1.1060 1.0966 39300
41010 ....... Kent County, Rhode Island ....................................................................................... 6483 1.1060 1.0966 39300
41020 ....... Newport County, Rhode Island ................................................................................. 6483 1.1060 1.0966 39300
41030 ....... Providence County, Rhode Island ............................................................................. 6483 1.1060 1.0966 39300
41050 ....... Washington County, Rhode Island ............................................................................ 6483 1.1060 1.0966 39300
42000 ....... Abbeville County, S Carolina .................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42010 ....... Aiken County, S Carolina .......................................................................................... 0600 0.9619 0.9565 12260
42020 ....... Allendale County, S Carolina .................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42030 ....... Anderson County, S Carolina .................................................................................... 3160 0.9677 0.8897 11340
42040 ....... Bamberg County, S Carolina .................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42050 ....... Barnwell County, S Carolina ..................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42060 ....... Beaufort County, S Carolina ..................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42070 ....... Berkeley County, S Carolina ..................................................................................... 1440 0.9438 0.9438 16700
42080 ....... Calhoun County, S Carolina ...................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.9047 17900
42090 ....... Charleston County, S Carolina .................................................................................. 1440 0.9438 0.9438 16700
42100 ....... Cherokee County, S Carolina ................................................................................... 3160 0.9677 0.8641 99942
42110 ....... Chester County, S Carolina ...................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42120 ....... Chesterfield County, S Carolina ................................................................................ 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42130 ....... Clarendon County, S Carolina .................................................................................. 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42140 ....... Colleton County, S Carolina ...................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42150 ....... Darlington County, S Carolina ................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8964 22500
42160 ....... Dillon County, S Carolina .......................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42170 ....... Dorchester County, S Carolina ................................................................................. 1440 0.9438 0.9438 16700
42180 ....... Edgefield County, S Carolina .................................................................................... 0600 0.9619 0.9565 12260
42190 ....... Fairfield County, S Carolina ...................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.9047 17900
42200 ....... Florence County, S Carolina ..................................................................................... 2655 0.9060 0.8964 22500
42210 ....... Georgetown County, S Carolina ............................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42220 ....... Greenville County, S Carolina ................................................................................... 3160 0.9677 1.0165 24860
42230 ....... Greenwood County, S Carolina ................................................................................ 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42240 ....... Hampton County, S Carolina .................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42250 ....... Horry County, S Carolina .......................................................................................... 5330 0.8873 0.8873 34820
42260 ....... Jasper County, S Carolina ........................................................................................ 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42270 ....... Kershaw County, S Carolina ..................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.9047 17900
42280 ....... Lancaster County, S Carolina ................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42290 ....... Laurens County, S Carolina ...................................................................................... 42 0.8634 1.0165 24860
42300 ....... Lee County, S Carolina ............................................................................................. 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42310 ....... Lexington County, S Carolina ................................................................................... 1760 0.9071 0.9047 17900
42320 ....... Mc Cormick County, S Carolina ................................................................................ 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42330 ....... Marion County, S Carolina ........................................................................................ 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42340 ....... Marlboro County, S Carolina ..................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42350 ....... Newberry County, S Carolina .................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42360 ....... Oconee County, S Carolina ...................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42370 ....... Orangeburg County, S Carolina ................................................................................ 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42380 ....... Pickens County, S Carolina ...................................................................................... 3160 0.9677 1.0165 24860
42390 ....... Richland County, S Carolina ..................................................................................... 1760 0.9071 0.9047 17900
42400 ....... Saluda County, S Carolina ........................................................................................ 42 0.8634 0.9047 17900
42410 ....... Spartanburg County, S Carolina ............................................................................... 3160 0.9677 0.9181 43900
42420 ....... Sumter County, S Carolina ....................................................................................... 8140 0.8386 0.8386 44940
42430 ....... Union County, S Carolina .......................................................................................... 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42440 ....... Williamsburg County, S Carolina .............................................................................. 42 0.8634 0.8641 99942
42450 ....... York County, S Carolina ............................................................................................ 1520 0.9725 0.9760 16740
43010 ....... Aurora County, S Dakota .......................................................................................... 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43020 ....... Beadle County, S Dakota .......................................................................................... 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43030 ....... Bennett County, S Dakota ......................................................................................... 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43040 ....... Bon Homme County, S Dakota ................................................................................. 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43050 ....... Brookings County, S Dakota ..................................................................................... 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43060 ....... Brown County, S Dakota ........................................................................................... 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43070 ....... Brule County, S Dakota ............................................................................................. 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43080 ....... Buffalo County, S Dakota .......................................................................................... 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43090 ....... Butte County, S Dakota ............................................................................................. 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43100 ....... Campbell County, S Dakota ...................................................................................... 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43110 ....... Charles Mix County, S Dakota .................................................................................. 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43120 ....... Clark County, S Dakota ............................................................................................. 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
43130 ....... Clay County, S Dakota .............................................................................................. 43 0.8476 0.8484 99943
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29151
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29152 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29153
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29154 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
45392 ....... Deaf Smith County, Texas ........................................................................................ 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45400 ....... Delta County, Texas .................................................................................................. 45 0.7936 1.0233 19124
45410 ....... Denton County, Texas ............................................................................................... 1920 1.0211 1.0233 19124
45420 ....... De Witt County, Texas .............................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45421 ....... Dickens County, Texas ............................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45430 ....... Dimmit County, Texas ............................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45431 ....... Donley County, Texas ............................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45440 ....... Duval County, Texas ................................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45450 ....... Eastland County, Texas ............................................................................................ 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45451 ....... Ector County, Texas .................................................................................................. 5800 0.9751 0.9894 36220
45460 ....... Edwards County, Texas ............................................................................................ 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45470 ....... Ellis County, Texas .................................................................................................... 1920 1.0211 1.0233 19124
45480 ....... El Paso County, Texas .............................................................................................. 2320 0.8924 0.8924 21340
45490 ....... Erath County, Texas .................................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45500 ....... Falls County, Texas ................................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45510 ....... Fannin County, Texas ............................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45511 ....... Fayette County, Texas .............................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45520 ....... Fisher County, Texas ................................................................................................ 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45521 ....... Floyd County, Texas ................................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45522 ....... Foard County, Texas ................................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45530 ....... Fort Bend County, Texas .......................................................................................... 3360 1.0101 1.0005 26420
45531 ....... Franklin County, Texas ............................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45540 ....... Freestone County, Texas .......................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45541 ....... Frio County, Texas .................................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45542 ....... Gaines County, Texas ............................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45550 ....... Galveston County, Texas .......................................................................................... 2920 0.9645 1.0005 26420
45551 ....... Garza County, Texas ................................................................................................ 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45552 ....... Gillespie County, Texas ............................................................................................ 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45560 ....... Glasscock County, Texas .......................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45561 ....... Goliad County, Texas ................................................................................................ 45 0.7936 0.8168 47020
45562 ....... Gonzales County, Texas ........................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45563 ....... Gray County, Texas .................................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45564 ....... Grayson County, Texas ............................................................................................. 7640 0.9516 0.9516 43300
45570 ....... Gregg County, Texas ................................................................................................ 4420 0.8897 0.8739 30980
45580 ....... Grimes County, Texas ............................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45581 ....... Guadaloupe County, Texas ....................................................................................... 7240 0.8993 0.8989 41700
45582 ....... Hale County, Texas ................................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45583 ....... Hall County, Texas .................................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45590 ....... Hamilton County, Texas ............................................................................................ 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45591 ....... Hansford County, Texas ............................................................................................ 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45592 ....... Hardeman County, Texas ......................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45600 ....... Hardin County, Texas ................................................................................................ 0840 0.8421 0.8421 13140
45610 ....... Harris County, Texas ................................................................................................. 3360 1.0101 1.0005 26420
45620 ....... Harrison County, Texas ............................................................................................. 4420 0.8897 0.8007 99945
45621 ....... Hartley County, Texas ............................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45630 ....... Haskell County, Texas .............................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45631 ....... Hays County, Texas .................................................................................................. 0640 0.9450 0.9450 12420
45632 ....... Hemphill County, Texas ............................................................................................ 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45640 ....... Henderson County, Texas ......................................................................................... 1920 1.0211 0.8007 99945
45650 ....... Hidalgo County, Texas .............................................................................................. 4880 0.8943 0.8943 32580
45651 ....... Hill County, Texas ..................................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45652 ....... Hockley County, Texas ............................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45653 ....... Hood County, Texas .................................................................................................. 2800 0.9545 0.8007 99945
45654 ....... Hopkins County, Texas ............................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45660 ....... Houston County, Texas ............................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45661 ....... Howard County, Texas .............................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45662 ....... Hudspeth County, Texas ........................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45670 ....... Hunt County, Texas ................................................................................................... 1920 1.0211 1.0233 19124
45671 ....... Hutchinson County, Texas ........................................................................................ 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45672 ....... Irion County, Texas ................................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8280 41660
45680 ....... Jack County, Texas ................................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45681 ....... Jackson County, Texas ............................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45690 ....... Jasper County, Texas ............................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45691 ....... Jeff Davis County, Texas .......................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45700 ....... Jefferson County, Texas ........................................................................................... 0840 0.8421 0.8421 13140
45710 ....... Jim Hogg County, Texas ........................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45711 ....... Jim Wells County, Texas ........................................................................................... 45 0.7936 0.8007 99945
45720 ....... Johnson County, Texas ............................................................................................. 2800 0.9545 0.9510 23104
45721 ....... Jones County, Texas ................................................................................................. 45 0.7936 0.7904 10180
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29155
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29156 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29157
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29158 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29159
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29160 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
50380 ....... Yakima County, Washington ..................................................................................... 9260 1.0165 1.0165 49420
51000 ....... Barbour County, W Virginia ....................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51010 ....... Berkeley County, W Virginia ..................................................................................... 8840 1.0983 0.9499 25180
51020 ....... Boone County, W Virginia ......................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.8428 16620
51030 ....... Braxton County, W Virginia ....................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51040 ....... Brooke County, W Virginia ........................................................................................ 8080 0.7827 0.7827 48260
51050 ....... Cabell County, W Virginia ......................................................................................... 3400 0.9486 0.9486 26580
51060 ....... Calhoun County, W Virginia ...................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51070 ....... Clay County, W Virginia ............................................................................................ 51 0.7908 0.8428 16620
51080 ....... Doddridge County, W Virginia ................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51090 ....... Fayette County, W Virginia ....................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51100 ....... Gilmer County, W Virginia ......................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51110 ....... Grant County, W Virginia .......................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51120 ....... Greenbrier County, W Virginia .................................................................................. 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51130 ....... Hampshire County, W Virginia .................................................................................. 51 0.7908 1.0224 49020
51140 ....... Hancock County, W Virginia ..................................................................................... 8080 0.7827 0.7827 48260
51150 ....... Hardy County, W Virginia .......................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51160 ....... Harrison County, W Virginia ...................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51170 ....... Jackson County, W Virginia ...................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51180 ....... Jefferson County, W Virginia ..................................................................................... 8840 1.0983 1.0932 47894
51190 ....... Kanawha County, W Virginia .................................................................................... 1480 0.8428 0.8428 16620
51200 ....... Lewis County, W Virginia .......................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51210 ....... Lincoln County, W Virginia ........................................................................................ 51 0.7908 0.8428 16620
51220 ....... Logan County, W Virginia ......................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51230 ....... Mc Dowell County, W Virginia ................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51240 ....... Marion County, W Virginia ........................................................................................ 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51250 ....... Marshall County, W Virginia ...................................................................................... 9000 0.7168 0.7168 48540
51260 ....... Mason County, W Virginia ......................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51270 ....... Mercer County, W Virginia ........................................................................................ 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51280 ....... Mineral County, W Virginia ........................................................................................ 1900 0.9326 0.9326 19060
51290 ....... Mingo County, W Virginia .......................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51300 ....... Monongalia County, W Virginia ................................................................................. 51 0.7908 0.8428 34060
51310 ....... Monroe County, W Virginia ....................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51320 ....... Morgan County, W Virginia ....................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.9499 25180
51330 ....... Nicholas County, W Virginia ...................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51340 ....... Ohio County, W Virginia ............................................................................................ 9000 0.7168 0.7168 48540
51350 ....... Pendleton County, W Virginia ................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51360 ....... Pleasants County, W Virginia .................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.8278 37620
51370 ....... Pocahontas County, W Virginia ................................................................................ 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51380 ....... Preston County, W Virginia ....................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.8428 34060
51390 ....... Putnam County, W Virginia ....................................................................................... 1480 0.8428 0.8428 16620
51400 ....... Raleigh County, W Virginia ....................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51410 ....... Randolph County, W Virginia .................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51420 ....... Ritchie County, W Virginia ........................................................................................ 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51430 ....... Roane County, W Virginia ......................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51440 ....... Summers County, W Virginia .................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51450 ....... Taylor County, W Virginia ......................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51460 ....... Tucker County, W Virginia ........................................................................................ 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51470 ....... Tyler County, W Virginia ........................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51480 ....... Upshur County, W Virginia ........................................................................................ 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51490 ....... Wayne County, W Virginia ........................................................................................ 3400 0.9486 0.9486 26580
51500 ....... Webster County, W Virginia ...................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51510 ....... Wetzel County, W Virginia ........................................................................................ 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
51520 ....... Wirt County, W Virginia ............................................................................................. 51 0.7908 0.8278 37620
51530 ....... Wood County, W Virginia .......................................................................................... 6020 0.8278 0.8278 37620
51540 ....... Wyoming County, W Virginia .................................................................................... 51 0.7908 0.7725 99951
52000 ....... Adams County, Wisconsin ........................................................................................ 52 0.9446 0.9480 99952
52010 ....... Ashland County, Wisconsin ....................................................................................... 52 0.9446 0.9480 99952
52020 ....... Barron County, Wisconsin ......................................................................................... 52 0.9446 0.9480 99952
52030 ....... Bayfield County, Wisconsin ....................................................................................... 52 0.9446 0.9480 99952
52040 ....... Brown County, Wisconsin ......................................................................................... 3080 0.9452 0.9452 24580
52050 ....... Buffalo County, Wisconsin ........................................................................................ 52 0.9446 0.9480 99952
52060 ....... Burnett County, Wisconsin ........................................................................................ 52 0.9446 0.9480 99952
52070 ....... Calumet County, Wisconsin ...................................................................................... 0460 0.9248 0.9298 11540
52080 ....... Chippewa County, Wisconsin .................................................................................... 2290 0.9210 0.9210 20740
52090 ....... Clark County, Wisconsin ........................................................................................... 52 0.9446 0.9480 99952
52100 ....... Columbia County, Wisconsin .................................................................................... 52 0.9446 1.0635 31540
52110 ....... Crawford County, Wisconsin ..................................................................................... 52 0.9446 0.9480 99952
52120 ....... Dane County, Wisconsin ........................................................................................... 4720 1.0764 1.0635 31540
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules 29161
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3
29162 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 96 / Thursday, May 19, 2005 / Proposed Rules
53100 ....... Laramie County, Wyoming ........................................................................................ 1580 0.8784 0.8784 16940
53110 ....... Lincoln County, Wyoming .......................................................................................... 53 0.9214 0.9214 99953
53120 ....... Natrona County, Wyoming ........................................................................................ 1350 0.9035 0.9035 16220
53130 ....... Niobrara County, Wyoming ....................................................................................... 53 0.9214 0.9214 99953
53140 ....... Park County, Wyoming .............................................................................................. 53 0.9214 0.9214 99953
53150 ....... Platte County, Wyoming ............................................................................................ 53 0.9214 0.9214 99953
53160 ....... Sheridan County, Wyoming ....................................................................................... 53 0.9214 0.9214 99953
53170 ....... Sublette County, Wyoming ........................................................................................ 53 0.9214 0.9214 99953
53180 ....... Sweetwater County, Wyoming .................................................................................. 53 0.9214 0.9214 99953
53190 ....... Teton County, Wyoming ............................................................................................ 53 0.9214 0.9214 99953
53200 ....... Uinta County, Wyoming ............................................................................................. 53 0.9214 0.9214 99953
53210 ....... Washakie County, Wyoming ..................................................................................... 53 0.9214 0.9214 99953
53220 ....... Weston County, Wyoming ......................................................................................... 53 0.9214 0.9214 99953
VerDate jul<14>2003 22:47 May 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19MYP3.SGM 19MYP3