a r t i c l e i n f o
abstract
Article history:
Received 25 September 2012
Received in revised form
4 December 2012
Accepted 9 December 2012
Available online 29 March 2013
This review deals with the study of Jatropha biomass as renewable materials for biocomposites and its
applications. Jatropha curcas is a multipurpose plant with many attributes and considerable potential.
Jatropha plant is cultivated worldwide but it has specic cultivation area in Central and South America,
Africa, and South Asia. The Jatropha plant produces many useful products, especially the seed from
which oil can be extracted. Extracted oil has similar properties to palm oil and possible to obtain many
products after processing. As biomass, Jatropha plant can used as a reinforcement in biocomposite
development. Jatropha contain high amount of carbon especially in seed/husk, fruit shell and seed cake
and can be used as ller in composite fabrication in the form of carbon black and activated carbon.
In this review, we will discuss the distribution of Jatropha around the globe, chemical composition
of various parts and extracts of Jatropha and their mechanical and physical properties. We will also
cover the use of Jatropha biomass in various technical and biocomposite applications. With the
development of green technology, Jatropha latex can be reduced to nanoparticle size. The chemical and
physical properties of Jatropha contribute to its applications in food and non-food Products.
& 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Jatropha
Filler
Biocomposites
Nanoparticles
Applications
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 668
Global distribution of Jatropha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 669
Jatropha plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 669
3.1.
Chemical composition of different parts of Jatropha. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 670
3.1.1.
Chemical composition of Jatropha leaves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 671
3.1.2.
Chemical composition of Jatropha seed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 671
3.1.3.
Chemical composition of Jatropha oil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 671
3.2.
Physical and mechanical properties of Jatropha plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672
Jatropha biomass as renewable materials for biocomposite fabrication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 673
4.1.
Jatropha based biocomposites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 674
4.1.1.
Jatropha oil cake incorporated glassepoxy composites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 675
4.1.2.
Jatropha oil cake lled styrenebutadiene rubber composites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 676
Jatropha an alternative carbonized ller to polymer composite. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 676
Jatropha as carbon black and activated carbon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 677
Nanotechnological advancement in jatropha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 678
Applications of Jatropha biomass. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 679
8.1.
Jatropha as resin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 680
8.2.
Jatropha as adhesive. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 681
8.3.
Oil for soap production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 682
1364-0321/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.036
668
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
8.4.
Oil as biodiesel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 682
8.5.
Paper from Jatropha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 683
8.6.
Other use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 683
9. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 683
Reference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 683
1. Introduction
Much academic research and industrial development explore
new ways to create greener and environmentally friendlier
chemicals and materials for a variety of applications. Biocomposites are the combination of natural bers (biobers) such as
wood bers (hardwood and softwood) or non-wood bers with
polymer matrices from both renewable and nonrenewable
resources. Researchers are trying to source for new alternative
materials that can replace the existing products. Many government interventions and directives have also been launched in
support to deal with this problem. Moreover, natural berreinforced composites and technical application like resin, adhesive come from renewable materials and now, they can be
obtained very easily. Biocomposite market is growing rapidly
and so competition is expected among the industries to design
superior strength biocomposites of commercial importance. The
two main drawbacks of presently developed biocomposites from
its rival glass ber composites are poor moisture resistance and
low impact strength. Recent research results show that there is a
large potential in improving those two properties. This potential
lays either in pre-treatment of the bers, engineering of bers or
in improving the chemistry while impregnating the bers with
the matrix polymer. Our three-corner approach in designing
biocomposites of superior/desired properties includes Bio-ber
treatment; Matrix modication and Novel Processing. Ecofriendly biocomposites from plant derived ber and cropderived plastics would be the novel materials of the 21st
century not only as a solution to the growing environmental
threat but also as a solution to alleviating the uncertainty of the
petroleum supply which is expected to decline between 2010 and
2020 [1]
Following decades of development of articial bers, attention
has been redirected onto the natural bers such as ax, hemp,
kenaf, sisal and jute. The advantages of natural bers over
synthetic or man-made bers such as carbon and glass are the
low density, low cost, acceptable specic strength properties,
biodegradability, ease of separation, and carbon dioxide sequestration [2]. Natural composites are emerging as a viable alternative to glass ber composites, particularly in automotive,
packaging, building, and consumer product industries, and
becoming one of the fastest growing additives for thermoplastics.
The only source available today that focuses on bio-based materials, natural bers, biopolymers, and biocomposites integrates the
principles of sustainability, industrial ecology, eco-efciency, and
green chemistry and engineering into the development of the
next generation of materials, products, and processes [1].
One of the plants that have many purposes is Jatropha curcas L.
It is a tropical plant that can be grown in low to high rainfall
areas. It can be used to reclaim land, as a hedge and/or as a
commercial crop. It is one of the renewable resources, not only as
bioenergy, but also for medical, food, and non-food application.
Jatropha is a multipurpose species with many attributes and
considerable potential. As biomass, Jatropha is attracting great
attention over the world as a source of renewable energy as well
as an alternative to fossil fuels. The Jatropha plant is currently
receiving a lot of attention as an energy plant [3]. The shells of the
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
669
France and the oil was used for street lighting and soap production [15].
J. curcas L. is often referred to as Jatropha. The genus name
s (doctor), trophe (food),
Jatropha derives from the Greek jatro
which implies medicinal uses [16]. J. curcas L. has many local
name, curcas is the common name in Malabar, India, bagani (Ivory
CoastMali), pourghe re (French), physic nut (English), tabanani
on (Latin America),
(Senegal), makaen/mmbono (Tanzania), pin
purgeernoot (Dutch), sketnoto (Surinamese) [8].
3. Jatropha plant
J. curcas is a small tree or large shrub with smooth gray bark,
which exudates a whitish colored watery latex, upon cut [16]. It
has large green to pale green leaves, alternate to sub-opposite,
three to ve lobed with a spirally phylotaxis. Different plant parts
of J. curcas are shown in Fig. 2. It has up to 5 m height and belongs
to the euphorbiaceae family [3,10]. The genus Jatropha contains
approximately 175 known species [9,17].
The Jatropha plants start yielding from the second year of
planting, but limited quantity [9,11]. The J. curcas plant has,
however, high agro-industrial potential because of its various
potentially benecial products. The seeds of Jatropha are good
source of oil, which can be used as a diesel substitute after
transesterication. They are used also in medicines, and soap and
cosmetics manufacture in various tropical countries. The residual
Fig. 1. Main distribution areas of Jatropha curcas (green) in the world. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure caption, the reader is referred to the web
version of this article.)
670
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
Table 1
Chemical composition of different parts of Jatropha plant.
Various part
Chemical composition
Root
Stembark
Leaves
Aerial parts
Latex
Seeds
Oil cake and
kernel
Adopted from [3].
On average the Jatropha fruits are 2.5 cm long, ovoid and each
fruit contains 23 seeds. It has nearly 400425 fruits per kg and
15001600 seeds per kg weight [9]. Dry Jatropha fruit contains
about 3540% shell and 6065% seed by weight [11]. The seed is
made up of about 42% husks and 58% kernel [9]. On fruit weight
basis, Jatropha contains about 1718% oil [9] and seeds contain up
to 34% oil. The seed contains about 42% hull/husk and 58%
kernel [9]. Composition of Jatropha fruit in Fig. 3.
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
671
Table 2
Chemical composition of Jatropha plant parts.
Part of Jatropha
73.6
87.3
78.5
74.4
89.1
86.7
8.8
12.2
10.1
5.2
8.9
5.9
(0.9)
(0.3)
(0.8)
(0.5)
(0.2)
(0.6)
(0.1)
(0.1)
(0.2)
(0.1)
(0.1)
(0.09)
VS (%TS)
90.2
89.4
88.4
90.0
93.0
92.0
92.8
91.6
96.2
95.6
95.0
89.2
(0.1)
(0.1)
(1.0)
(0.2)
(1.1)
(0.7)
(0.2)
(0.3)
(0.1
(0.1)
(0.3)
(0.5)
pH
6.91
5.91
5.77
6.43
5.27
5.81
6.51
6.26
7.34
6.23
6.63
5.32
C/N ratio
(0.02)
(0.05)
(0.07)
(0.03)
(0.08)
(0.07)
(0.05)
(0.02)
(0.01)
(0.03)
(0.07)
(0.08)
9.7
24.1
9.4
7.1
14.3
10.1
12.5
30.4
32.1
17.1
13.9
17.7
(0.6)
(0.7)
(1.1)
(0.4)
(0.9)
(0.5)
(1.1)
(0.6)
(0.5)
(0.3)
(0.7)
(0.9)
Acid-detergent ber
Lignin (gg 1 VS)
0.200
0.134
0.180
0.144
0.090
0.098
0.097
0.142
0.083
0.052
0.042
0.056
0.310
0.324
0.338
0.344
0.301
0.326
0.302
0.393
0.624
0.274
0.274
0.369
0.01 (0.002)
0.01 (0.001)
0.006 (0.001)
0.00
0.02 (0.001)
0.005 (0.001)
0.02 (0.001)
0.01 (0.001)
0.01 (0.005)
0.00
0.01 (0.002)
0.02 (0.002)
(0.002)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.005)
(0.004)
(0.001)
(0.001)
(0.003)
(0.007)
(0.003)
(0.008)
(0.005)
(0.005)
(0.006)
(0.008)
(0.015)
(0.015)
(0.013)
(0.006)
(0.008)
(0.009)
(0.007)
(0.009)
(0.005)
Table 3
Chemical composition of Jatropha protein (on dry matter basis).
Jatropha parts
Crude fat
Crude ber
Crude ash
Crude protein
Reference
Seed cake
80 (gr kg 1 dm)
56.858.4 (%)
0.51.4
1.01.5
8.2 (% w/w)
87 (gr kg 1 dm)
3.64.3
2.86.1
9.610.4
12.0 (% w/w)
[23]
[27]
[24]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[26]
[26]
[24]
Table 4
Chemical composition of Jatropha leaf.
Component
Fat
Crude protein
Carbohydrate
Soluble sugar
Polysaccharide
Arabinose
Xylose
Mannose
Galactose
Glucose
Pectin
Lignin
Acid insoluble lignin
Acid soluble lignin
Ash
8.2
20.6
15.3
10.2
0.6
1.0
0.6
1.5
7.1
3.9
23.5
2.8
12.0
672
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
density and bulk density), surface area and specic surface area
affect the resistance to airow through the bulk material bed and
data on them are necessary in designing the drying process. Bulk
density is used in determining the size of the storage bin. Moisture
content is a useful information in the drying process. Static friction
coefcient of various surfaces affects the maximum inclination
angle of conveyor and storage bin. The magnitude of frictional
force affects the amount of power required to convey the materials.
Angle of repose is a useful parameter for calculation of belt
conveyor width and for designing the shape of storage. Mechanical
properties such as rupture force, hardness and energy used for
rupturing fruit, shell and kernel are useful information in designing
the dehulling or nut shelling machine and oil extractor. The
rupture force indicates the minimum force required for dehulling
the fruit or shelling the nut and to extract the oil from kernel. The
deformation at rupture point can be used for the determination of
the gap size between the surfaces to compress the fruit or shell for
dehulling or shelling [32].
Table 7
Chemical and physical properties of Jatropha oil.
Source: Giibitz et al. [32].
Table 5
Carbohydrate and amino acid composition of JC from J. curcas seed endosperm.
Carbohydrate monomer
JC (mol%)
Carbohydrate monomer
JC (mol%)
Fucose
Rhamnose
Arabinose
Galactose
Glucose
1.1
9.9
27.9
33.4
11.9
Mannose
Xylose
Ribose
Galacturonic acid
Glucuronic acid
4.0
3.5
4.9
2.7
0.7
Amino acid
JC (mol%)
Amino acid
JC (mol%)
Arginine
Lysine
Glutamine
Alanine
Threonine
Glicine
Valine
Hydroxyproline
Serine
Proline
7.5
9.7
10.2
11.0
4.2
10.1
6.4
0.3
7.6
4.0
Isoleucine
Leucine
Methionine
Histidine
Phenylanine
Glutamate
Aspartate
Cystine
Tyrosine
Tryptophane
5.4
8.4
0.3
3.5
2.8
1.9
1.4
3.1
0.8
1.2
Parameter
Jatropha oil
Density at 15 1C
Viscosity at 30 1C
Flash point
Fire point
Cloud point
Pour point
Cetane namber
Caloric value
Conratson carbon residue
Hydrogen
Sulfur
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Ash content
Neutralization number
Saponication value
Iodine number
Monoglycerides
Diglicerides
Triglycerides
Water
Phosphorus
Calcium
Magnecium
Iron
0.920 gr/cm3
52 cSt
240 1C
274 7 3 1C
9 7 1 1C
4 7 1 1C
38
38.20 Mj/kg
0.8 7 0.1 (% w/w)
10.52 (% w/w)
0 (% w/w)
11.06 (% w/w)
0
76.11 (% w/w)
0.03 (% w/w)
0.92 mg KOH/gr
198.00
94
Not detected
2.7% m/m
97.3% m/m
0.07% m/m
290 mg/kg
56 mg/kg
103 mg/kg
2.4 mg/kg
Jatropha oila
Palm oila,b
Coconut oilb
Sunower oilb
Soybean oilb
0.38
16.0
13.5
67
4243.5
3334.5
0.8
3.5
39.5
3.5
46
7.5
8
8
48
16.0
8.5
2.5
6.5
2.0
0.5
0.2
4.8
0.8
5.7
20.6
66.2
0.8
0.1
11.0
0.1
4.0
23.4
53.2
7.8
9.8
6.2
72.2
11.8
a
b
40.3
3.1
43.3
13.2
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
673
Table 8
Physical and mechanical properties of Jatropha fruits, seed and kernel.
Propeties
Fruit
Seed
Kernel
1000-unit mass, g
Seed fraction, %
Kernel fraction, %
Shell fraction, %
Hull fraction, %
Length, mm
Equatorial width perpendicular to the length, mm
Breadth perpendicular to the length and width, mm
Geometric mean diameter, mm
Sphericity
Bulk density, g/cm3
Solid density, g/cm3
Porosity, %
Surface area, mm2
Specic surface area, cm2/cm3
100
3
3
3
1322.47 14.6
688.1 7 5.7
100
100
100
100
100
3
20
NA
100
100
14,560.9 72412.4
24.53
12.63
11.90
75.47
33.36 71.58
30.057 1.08
31.51 70.97
31.60 71.01
0.957 0.03
0.477 0.00
0.957 0.02
50.53
3139.217 197.41
0.907 0.07
21.02 71.03
9.58 7 0.28
11.97 7 0.30
13.40 70.36
0.64 70.03
0.45 70.01
1.04 70.04
56.73
534.127 31.81
1.91 7 0.12
15.45 7 0.54
7.42 7 0.33
10.25 7 0.36
10.55 7 0.34
0.68 7 0.01
0.42 7 0.01
1.02 7 0.05
58.82
306.48 7 22.08
2.12 7 0.08
3
3
3
0.507 0.05
0.647 0.05
0.467 0.02
0.49 70.03
0.46 70.01
0.49 70.04
0.72 7 0.06
0.73 7 0.03
0.65 7 0.02
Angel of repose
Filling method
Emtying method
Rupture force, N
Deformation at rupture point, mm
Deformation ratio at rupture point, mm
Hardness, N/mm
Energy used for rupture, N mm
3
3
20
20
20
20
20
53.53 71.72
42.91 70.67
135.397 54.86
4.36 71.42
0.157 0.05
30.58 75.88
300.88 7237.84
54.00 75.13
37.76 7 2.85
146.637 14.82
2.10 70.19
0.22 70.02
69.98 7 6.22
124.447 19.95
60.23 7 6.16
42.92 7 0.82
67.72 7 19.03
1.74 7 0.37
0.23 7 0.05
38.52 7 5.59
51.61 7 26.84
674
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
would yield economics competitive with those of existing largevolume petrochemical polymers. In other words, the low costs
achievable with plant crop production of PHAs will allow polymers, materials, and chemicals derived from them to serve as
realistic, cost-effective, sustainable alternatives to many of the
largest-volume plastics and chemicals now made by the petrochemical industry.
Fibers provide strength and stiffness and act as reinforced
composite materials; ultimately the properties of a composite are
governed by the inherent properties of these bers. The properties of natural bers mainly depend upon its chemical composition. Chemical composition of bers depends on various factors. It
varies with the geographic location, climate, type of ber, plant
part and soil conditions, etc. [39].
The matrix in a ber-reinforced composite holds the ber
together, transfers applied loads to those ber and protecs them
from mechanical damage and other environmental factors. Jatropha plant as woody plant has many purposes in parts of the plant.
Depend on the chemical and physical properties, Jatropha plant
has potential as biocomposite reinforcement/ller.
4.1. Jatropha based biocomposites
Composite manufacturing industries have to look for plant
based natural ber reinforcements, such as Jatropha plant as an
alternative material which is going to replace solid wood. Natural
bers can be classied into plant-based and animal-based bers.
To be used as reinforcement, pure bers need to be extracted and
separated from all cementing substances that are present in the
natural plant or animal raw material (hemicelluloses, lignin, wax,
proteins, etc.). Plant bers include bast (or stem or soft sclerenchyma) febres, leaf or hard bers, seed, fruit, wood, cereal straw
and other grass bers. In general, plant-based natural bers are
lignocellulose in nature composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and
lignin, whereas animal based bers are of proteins, e.g., silk and
wool. Wood, that is, a brous composite in itself is commonly
used in the form of wood pulp [40,41]. Wood is natural threedimensional polymeric composite and consists primarily of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. In addition, wood is an original
Table 9
The composition of difference plant of natural ber.
Type of ber
A
Bast ber
Fiber ax
Seed ax
Kenaf
Jute
Hemp
Ramie
Core Fiber
Kenaf
Jute
Leaf ber
Abaca
Sisal
Henequen
Jatropha hulk
Wood component of Jatropha shell
Jatropha Stem
Jatropha fruit shell
Jatropha waste
Jatropha fruit coat
Sugar cane bagasse
Leaet of phoenix dactilyvera palm
Rachis of phoenix dactilyvera palm
Cotton lintners
Cellulose (%)
Lignin (%)
Pectin (%)
Ash (%)
71
4347
3157
4171.5
60
5777
86.691
2.2
2123
1519
1226
15.9
3.713
0.60.7
18.620.6
2426
21.523
13.621
22.1
1422.4
516.7
2.3
0.2
0.9
1.9
5
25
0.52
1
0.8
3749
4148
1521
2124
1824
1822
24
0.8
5663
4778
77.6
42.843.3
22.29
42.99
33.75
56.31
13.11
54.355.2
33.5
44
90
79
711
13.1
9.610.2
47.60
24.11
11.90
23.91
28.91
24.325.3
27
14
1517
1024
48
14.715.2
23.84
19.11
9.70
17.47
7.69
16.829.7
26
28
6
10
3
0.61
1.1
6.2
2.5
Reference
[45]
[49]
[45]
[45]
[45]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[9]
[53]
[54]
[49]
[49]
[49]
[49]
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
675
Fig. 4. Scheme of the cellulose cell wall and microbril organization [49].
Fig. 5. SEM image of worn surface of JOC lled GE composite at (a) 135 and (b) 540 m abrading distance [56].
676
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
Fig. 6. SEM image of worn surface of SiC JOC GE composite at (a) 135 and (b) 540 m abrading distance [56].
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
677
Table 10
Composition of xed carbon Jatropha plant.
Parameter analysis
Peoximate analysis
Moisture (% wb)
Ash (% db)
Volatile matter (% db)
Fixed carbon (db)
Sulfur (% db)
Ultimate analysis
Carbon (%)
Hydrogen (%)
Oxygen (%)
Nitrogen (%)
Reference
Oil cake
Shell
Seed shell/husk
08.71
04.30
70.92
16.06
0.01
12.35
14.88
68.73
16.38
10.75
3.97
71.04
24.99
59.17
06.52
33.93
0.38
[64]
[9]
[9,11]
has been commonly used for the removal of organic dyes from
textile waste water. Agricultural by-products and waste materials
used for the production of activated carbons include olive stones,
almond shells, apricot and peach stones, maize cob, linseed straw,
saw dust, rice hulls, cashew nut hull, cashew nut sheath, coconut
shells and husks, eucalyptus bark, linseed cake, tea waste ash.
Besides these, other sources of activated carbon are sulfonated
coal, tyre coal dust, activated bauxite, cement kiln dust, shale oil
ash, ground sunower stalk, etc. All these activated carbons have
been successfully used for the adsorption processes [60].
Activated carbons are prepared by physical and chemical
activation methods. There are two important advantages of
chemical activation over physical activation. One is lower temperature in which the process is accomplished. The other is that
the global yield of the chemical activation tends to be greater
since burn-off char can be avoided. Acid activation followed by
the thermal treatment increases the adsorption capacity to a large
extent due to the increased surface area and pore volume [63,69].
During the extraction of biodiesel from Jatropha seed, the shell
disposal is going to be a concern for environmentalists. Raw
Jatropha seed shell is toxic [70] and demands appropriate treatment in order not be harmful to human and the environment [60].
One of the possible ways of utilization of this large quantity of toxic
waste rich in lignin, is to utilize it as a possible precursor for
preparation of activated carbon, a popular adsorbent widely used
in industries for variety of applications. Activated carbons are
widely prepared from variety of biomass precursors and the
industry demands availability of cheap source of biomass that
produce good quality activated carbons [61,62]
Jatropha seed and seed cake is potential to be ller in polymer
composites, because they have xed carbon compounds (Table 5).
Many researchers study about carbon black and activated carbon
from various method but they were studied for purication
purpose. The researchers have studied about carbonized of, fruit,
seed and seed cake of carbon from Jatropha. Jatropha seed shell will
be generated in large quantities as an agro-industrial solid waste
in the biodiesel production industries. Jatropha seed shell constitutes nearly 80% of the dried vegetable [63].
Karthikeyan et al. [60] have studied activated carbon from
Jatropha seed shell with activated by chemical, the result summaries in Table 11. The result shows that the bulk density values
are on the lower side, which may be due to highly branched and
porous carbon with more void space. Except H2SO4, ZnCl2, Na2CO3
and NH4S2O8 carbon all the carbons found to be basic in nature.
Due to the presence of highly porous organic matter in Jatropha
shell, the quantity of volatile matter shows a higher trend. High
value of ash and volatile matter reduces the quantity of xed
carbon. Kumar and Chinnaiya [63] also used Jatropha seed shell as
678
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
Table 11
Jatropha seed shell waste activated carbon properties.
Propertis
HCl
H2SO4
ZnCl2
Na2SO4
Na2CO3
CaCO3
CaCl3
H2SO4 NH4S2O8
H2SO4 H2O2
pH
Moisture content, %
Ash content, %
Volatile matter, %
Fixed carbon, %
Conductivity, mS/cm
Specic gravity, S
Bulk density, D
Porosity (S-D/S) 100, %
Matter soluble in water, %
Matter soluble in acid, %
Surface area, m2/g
Iodine number, mg/g
Sodium, w/w%
Potassium, w/w%
Iron content, w/w%
CCl4 activity
Phenol adsoption capacity, mg/g
9.55
11.00
7.42
30.00
69.00
0.22
1.25
0.44
44.20
1.84
1.25
1195
1143
15.00
10.60
1.40
0.36
5.21
4.67
2.00
11.94
26.70
73.50
0.10
1.33
0.39
53.08
1.06
1.08
709
668
5.50
5.70
1.20
0.55
2.85
6.60
8.00
19.57
27.50
59.80
0.61
1.49
0.44
69.48
1.74
1.62
590
899
8.00
3.10
1.00
0.59
3.62
8.50
10.00
17.77
31.20
73.10
0.13
0.89
0.40
62.56
2.12
1.42
456
412
15.00
6.10
0.90
1.14
1.22
5.74
10.00
14.00
20.00
73.80
0.33
1.10
0.63
64.55
1.41
0.94
629
589
5.50
2.00
1.10
1.19
2.28
9.20
16.40
10.57
24.20
72.10
0.37
1.48
0.29
64.86
1.22
0.74
408
368
8.00
5.00
1.20
0.52
0.80
7.16
8.20
13.07
27.80
69.70
0.24
1.32
0.39
72.15
0.72
0.92
1064
998
6.40
5.00
0.80
0.72
4.20
6.85
9.60
8.67
31.30
81.00
0.19
1.88
0.28
61.26
1.02
1.41
664
612
5.50
7.60
1.00
1.32
3.08
7.05
10.10
10.85
34.20
84.30
0.42
1.37
0.45
72.34
1.20
1.91
751
723
8.40
7.10
1.20
1.19
2.64
Yield, %
42
39
44
32
activated carbon by chemical activation. Duan [61,62] has investigated activated carbon Jatropha seed shell comparison by conventional heating and microwave heating, and optimization using
response surface methodology (Table 12).
To utilize Jatropha fruit shell, biomass waste, for the preparation of activated carbon by simple thermo-chemical activation
using NaOH as an activating agent has studied by Kumar and
Chinnaiya [63]. The effects of impregnation ratio of reagent to
char, activation temperature and activation time on iodine and
methylene blue numbers of the activated carbon were studied in
order to obtain high adsorption capacity and surface area of the
product. Subsequently, the physico-chemical characteristics of
the activated carbon, obtained by optimum conditions, were also
determined.
Palanivel et al. [70] used activated carbon from J. curcas pods
for removal of reactive dye, RBBR from textile efuent. This may
provide the solution for cleansing of Jatropha wastes and their
reutilizations which in turn will protect the environment from the
pollution of dye. Therefore, in this study dye adsorption efciency, adsorption kinetics and adsorption isotherm models of
Jatropha activated carbon were performed. Bench scale experiments and desorption studies were also carried out to understand
the reusability of activated carbon.
55
37
52
62
32
Table 12
Pore size distribution, total pore volume and average pore size of activated carbon
from Jatropha seed shell.
Sample
Char
Conventional heating
with CO2
Conventional heating
with CO2
Microwave heting
with steam
Microwave heating
with CO2
Surface area,
m2/g
Pore volume,
cm3/g
Avarage pore,
nm
480
748
0.42
0.53
3.50
2.85
1207
0.86
2.86
1350
1.07
3.10
1284
0.87
2.71
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
Shriram [7] has investigated the particles size and nanoparticle form Jatropha latex. The spherical in shape is shown in
Fig. 9a and the particle size distribution was measured using a
DLS (Dynamic light scattering) unit as shown in Fig. 9b. Particles
formed were of monodisperse type showing diameter in the
range of 517.5 nm. The results of DLS and TEM are in agreement
with each other, because the as synthesized solutions were
used for characterization. Some difference in particle size is
observed when nanoparticles are isolated and redispersed.
Particle formed showed excellent reproducibility and uniformity
(Fig. 9).
679
Fig. 8. TEM of (a) TiO2 and (b) ZnS nanoparticles from Jatropha latex.
Fig. 9. (a) Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of lead nanoparticles showing spherical shape. Particle size (b) distribution of latex stabilized lead nanoparticles.
680
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
681
Table 13
Comparison of physical properties of alkyl resin and vanish.
Sr.
No
Properties
Alkyl resin
Density
Viscosity
Nonvolatile matter
1
2
3
B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Specied value
in IS 10,026
Non tacky
23 1C min
1.26
166,000 cps
92.71%
1.01
1250 cps
70%
1.14
41,600 cps
98.96%
1.075
50 cps
50%
4 h at 130 1C
25 1C
S.2, U.2,I.5, I.42
0.94
50 cps
50%
3 h at 120 1C
36 1C
S.2, U.2,I.5, I.42
1.08
200 cps
50%
3 h at 120 1C
25 1C
S.2, U.2,I.5, I.42
W.2
No softening, blistering,
wringkling, this integration or
seperation of varnish lm
Slightly yellow color of oil
No softening, blistering,
wringkling, this integration or
seperation of varnish lm
Slightly yellow color of oil
No softening, blistering,
wringkling, this integration or
seperation of varnish lm
Slightly yellow color of oil
(b) Before: 0.0012 mg KOH/g, after: (b) Acidity: nil before and after
0.03 mg KOH/g
(c) Before: 0.01%, after: 0.015%
(c) Nil before and after
No crack observed
No crack observed
No crack observed
682
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
Table 14
Jatropha seed protein adhesive properties [24].
Adhesive formulation
13% Casein
13% PC protein
Solvent
Viscosity [cP] direct
Viscosity [cP] 2 days
pH
Color
Set time (min)
Open time (min)
Adhesion (60% RH)
Adhesion (water)
Water
888 7 87
116 7 14
7
Yellow
2.5 7 0.7
3.5 7 0.7
0.055 M NaOH
931 7115
383 76.2
8
Brown
1.25 70.4
87 2.83
0.55 M NaOH
4338 7 442
170 73.5
8
Brown
2.25 7 0.35
9.5 70.7
Tabel 15
Total phenol, tannins and condensed tannins in meal, shell and seed shell of jatropha varieties (on dry matter basis).
Item
Variety
Cape Verde
Nicaragua
Ife-Nigeria
Non-toxic Mexico
Kernel
Shell
Kernel
Shell
Kernel
Shell
Seed shell
Kernel
Shell
0.36
0.04
Non
detectable
3.0
2.2
Non
detectable
0.29
0.03
Non
detectable
2.8
2.0
Non
detectable
0.31
0.0
Non
detectable
3.1
2.2
Non
detectable
0.18
0.01
Non
detectable
0.22
0.02
Non
detectable
4.4
2.9
Non
detectable
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
683
cosmetic industries. The extraction of the biodiesel after transesterication of the seed oil leads to two main by-products that is
glycerol and press or oil cake. Glycerol has many useful industrial
applications as a raw material for the synthesis of 1, 3 propane-diol
and other polymeric materials [29,95]. The bark of Jatropha contains tannin. It can also have the honey production potential as the
owers can attract bees.
9. Conclusions
Green materials are the asset of the future. There is immense
opportunity in developing new bio-based products, but the real
challenge is to design sustainable bio-based products. New
environmental regulations and societal concern have triggered
the search for new products and processes that are compatible
with the environment. The corporation of bio-resources in composite materials can reduce further dependency on petroleum
reserves.
J. curcas L. is a versatile plant with several actual and potential
uses. Development of Jatropha in the world gives various applications. The Jatropha plant can become globally competitive due to
the fact that it belongs to a non-edible category and does not
compete with food.
Each part of Jatropha plant has many chemicals with various
compositions. We can develop several products beside medicine,
food, cosmetic, etc., also application for biocomposite, but it
is still less. The oil from the seed of the plant is potentially
the most valuable end product. Beside used as biodiesel, soap,
etc., the application for technical as resin and adhesive have
been investigated. The seed cake contains proteins such as curcin
and probhol ester, this compound can be used as adhesive. Leaf
and stem of Jatropha could be extracted to resin and another
purpose.
From the above discussions, it is clear that the Jatropha plant
has capabilities to provide the products for different applications
apart as a diesel substitute which needs to be captured and
improved. The research on the utilization of the by-products of
Jatropha namely seed husk, seed kernel, glycerol, etc. in the
material manufacturing area needs to be explored.
Reference
[1] Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT. Surface modications of natural bers and
performance of resulting bio-composites an overview. Composite Interface 2001;8:31343.
[2] Lee MW, Ho SY, Lim KP, Ng TT, Juay YK. Development of iocomposites with
improved mechanical properties, vol. 9; 2008.
[3] Ashwani Kumar, Sharma Satyawati. An evaluation of multipurpose oil seed
crop for industrial uses (Jatropha curcas L.): a review. Industrial Crops and
Products 2008;28:110.
684
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
[42] Taj Saira, Munawa Munawar Ali, Khan Sha ullah. Review natural ber
reinforced polymer composites. Proceedings of Pakistan Academy of
Science 2007;44(2):12944.
[43] Kalia Susheel, Kaith BS, Kaur Inderjeet. Pretreatments of natural bers and
their application as reinforcing material in polymer compositesa review.
Polymer Engineering and Science 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/
pen.21328.
[44] Mokhothu TH, Guduri BR, Luyt AS. Kenaf ber-reinforced copolyester
biocomposites. Polymer Composites 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pc.
[45] Li Xue, Tabil G. Satyanarayan Panigrahi chemical treatments of natural ber
for use in natural ber-reinforced composites: a review. Journal of Polymers
and the Environment 2007;15:2533, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10924006-0042-3.
[46] Sgriccia N, Hawley a MC, Misra M. Characterization of natural ber surfaces
and natural ber composites. Composites: Part A 2008;39:16327.
[47] Oksmana K, Skrifvarsb M, Selin JF. Natural bers as reinforcement in
polylactic acid (PLA) composites. Composites Science and Technology
2003;63:131724.
[48] Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS. Cellulosic/synthetic ber reinforced polymer
hybrid composite: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers 2011;86:118.
[49] Siqueira Gilberto, Bras Julien, Dufresne Alain. Review; cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers
2010;2:72865, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym2040728.
[50] Jiang Li-Qun, Fang Zhen, Guo Feng, Yang Lin-bin. Production of 2,3butanediol from acid hydrolysates of Jatropha hulls with Klebsiella
Oxytoca. Bioresource Technology 2012;107:40510.
[51] Diego-Armando Z. Wever, H.J. Heeres, Antonius A. Broekhuis. Characterization of Physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.) shells, biomass and bioenergy
2012;37:17787.
[52] Vaithanomsat Pilanee, Waraporn Apiwatanapiwat. Feasibility study on vanillin
production from Jatropha curcas stem using steam explosion as a pretreatment.
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 2009;53.
[53] Viboon Sricharoenchaikul, Chanida Marukatat, Duangduen Atong, Fuel
production from physic nut (Jatropha Curcas L.) waste by xed-bed
pyrolysis process, ENETT2550-072.
[54] Dhanya MS, Gupta N, Joshi HC, Lata. Biogas potentiality of agro-wastes
Jatropha fruit coat. International Journal of Environmental Science and
Engineering 2009;1:3.
H.P.S.Abdul Khalil et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 667685
[69] Kunbin Yang, Peng Jinhui, Srinivasakannan C, Zhang Libo, Xia Hongying,
Duan Xinhui. Preparation of high surface area activated carbon from
coconut shells using microwave heating. Bioresource Technology 2010;101:
61639.
[70] Palanivel Sathishkumar, Mani Arulkumar, Palvannan Thayumanavan. Utilization of agro-industrial waste Jatropha curcas pods as an activated carbon
for the adsorption of reactive dye Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR). Journal of
Cleaner Production 2012;22:6775.
[71] Sanjeeva Witharana, Hodges Chris, Xu Dan, Lai Xiaojun, Ding Yulong.
Aggregation and settling in aqueous polydisperse alumina nanoparticle
suspensions. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2012;14:851, http://dx.doi.or
g/10.1007/s11051-012-0851-3.
[72] Van den Berg AJJ, Horsten SFAJ, Kettenes-van den Bosch JJ, Kroes BH,
Beukelman CJ, Leeang BR, Labadie RP. Curcacycline A-a novel cyclic
octapeptide isolated from the latex of Jatropha curcas L. FEBS Lett
1995;358:2158.
[73] Auvin C, Baraguey C, Blond A, Lezenven F, Pousset JL, Bodo B. Curcacycline B,
a cyclic nonapeptide from Jatropha curcas enhancing rotamase activity of
cyclophilin. Tetrahedron Letters 1997;38:28458.
[74] Bar Harekrishna, Bhui Dipak Kr, Sahoo P, Sarkar Priyanka, Pyne Santanu,
Misra Ajay. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using seed extract of
Jatropha curcas. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering
Aspects 2009;348:2126.
[75] Manish Hudlikar, Joglekarc Shreeram, Dhaygude Mayur, Kodam Kisan.
Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles by using aqueous extract of Jatropha
curcas L. latex. Materials Letters 2012;75:1969.
[76] Vaz CM, Graaf LAD, Mulder WJ. Adhesives coatings and bioplastics from
protein sources. In: Fahnestock SR, Steinbuchel A, editors. Polyamides
and complex proteinaceous materials II. New York: Wiley-VCH; 2003.
p. 383404.
[77] Hajime Kishi, Akamatsu Yuki, Noguchi Masayuki, Fujita Akira, Matsuda
Satoshi, Nishida Hirofumi. Synthesis of epoxy resins from alcohol-liqueed
wood and the mechanical properties of the cured resins. Journal of Applied
Polymer Science 2011;120:74551.
[78] Hlaing1 Nway Nay, Oo Mya Mya. Manufacture of alkyd resin from castor oil,
World Academy of Science. Engineering and Technology 2008;48.
[79] Satheesh Kumar MN, Zahira Yaakob, Siti Maimunah, Siddaramaiah, Abdullah SRS. Synthesis of alkyd resin from non-edible Jatropha seed oil. Journal
of Polymers and the Environment 2010;18(4):53944.
[80] Lu J, Wool RP. Additive toughening effects on new bio-based thermosetting
resins from plant oils. Compos- ites Science and Technology 2008;68:
10251033.
[81] Odetoye TE, Ogunniyi DS, Olatunji GA. Preparation and evaluation of
Jatropha curcas Linneaus seed oil alkyd resins. Industrial Crops and Products
2010;32:22530.
[82] Xiaosong Huang, Netravali Anil. Characterization of ax ber reinforced soy
protein resin based green composites modied with nano-clay particles.
Composites Science and Technology 2007;67:200514.
[83] Subrata Mondal, Memmott Paul, Wallis Lynley, Martin Darren. Physicothermal properties of spinifex resin bio-polymer. Materials Chemistry and
Physics 2012;133:6929.
[84] Patel VC, Varughese J, Krishnamoorthy PA, Jain RC, Singh AK, Ramamoorty
M. Synthesis of alkyd resin from Jatropha and rapeseed oils and their
[85]
[86]
[87]
[88]
[89]
[90]
[91]
[92]
[93]
[94]
[95]
[96]
[97]
[98]
[99]
[100]
[101]
685