Anda di halaman 1dari 5

18004 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

67 / Friday, April 8, 2005 / Notices

0.07 ppm, the anticipated iprovalicarb imported sources is estimated to be established an MRL of 1.0 ppm for
residue in tomato paste is only 0.10 35%, 43.3%, 7%, and 15%, iprovalicarb residues in/on tomatoes.
ppm. (0.07 ppm x 1.38 = 0.10 ppm). respectively. The percent U.S. [FR Doc. 05–7042 Filed 4–7–05; 8:45 am]
consumption of tomato commodities
B. Toxicological Profile BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
potentially treated with iprovalicarb
OPPTS Harmonized Guideline that is from imported sources is
870.1100, Acute oral toxicity, LD50 estimated to be 13.4% for fresh tomatoes ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
5,000 milligram/kilogram/body weight and 2.9% for processed tomatoes. AGENCY
(mg/kg/bwt) is the only entry that did ii. Drinking water. Iprovalicarb is not
not appear in Table 1 of the final rule registered for use in the United States.
[OPP–2005–0089; FRL–7706–8]
of August 22, 2002. Therefore, there is no exposure to
1. Acute toxicity. See Table 1 of the Flumioxazin; Notice of Filing a
iprovalicarb through drinking water in Pesticide Petition to Establish a
final rule published in the Federal the United States.
Register of August 22, 2002 (67 FR Tolerance for a Certain Pesticide
54351) (FRL–7194–3). 2. Non-dietary exposure. Iprovalicarb Chemical in or on Food
2. Genotoxicity. See Table 1 of the is not registered for use in the United
States. Therefore, there is no non- AGENCY: Environmental Protection
final rule published in the Federal Agency (EPA).
Register of August 22, 2002 (67 FR dietary exposure to iprovalicarb in the
United States. ACTION: Notice.
54351).
3. Reproductive and developmental D. Cumulative Effects SUMMARY: This notice announces the
toxicity. See Table 1 of the final rule initial filing of a pesticide petition
published in the Federal Register of Iprovalicarb is a member of a new proposing the establishment of
August 22, 2002 (67 FR 54351). class of chemistry and does not have a regulations for residues of a certain
4. Subchronic toxicity. See Table 1 of mode of action that is common with pesticide chemical in or on various food
the final rule published in the Federal other registered pesticides. Therefore, commodities.
Register of August 22, 2002 (67 FR there are no cumulative effects.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket
54351).
E. Safety Determination identification (ID) number OPP–2005–
5.Chronic toxicity. See Table 1 of the
0089, must be received on or before May
final rule published in the Federal 1. U.S. population. Iprovalicarb has 9, 2005.
Register of August 22, 2002 (67 FR low acute toxicity, so no acute safety
54351). ADDRESSES: Comments may be
determination is needed. EPA has
6. Animal metabolism. See Table 1 of submitted electronically, by mail, or
previously determined that the chronic
the final rule published in the Federal through hand delivery/courier. Follow
Population Adjusted Dose for
Register of August 22, 2002 (67 FR the detailed instructions as provided in
iprovalicarb is 0.026 mg/kg/bwt/day and
54351). Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
the uncertainty factor is 100. Based
7. Metabolite toxicology. The toxicity INFORMATION.
upon average residues in/on imported
of p-methyl-phenethylamine, a rat, plant tomato commodities, and assuming that FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
and soil metabolite, was investigated in 100% of the tomato commodities that Joanne I. Miller, Registration Division
two studies: are imported from countries in which (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
i. The acute oral LD50 in Wistar rats iprovalicarb is potentially used have Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
was determined to be in the range of 300 been treated with iprovalicarb, the Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,Washington,
to 500 mg/kg/bwt. estimated chronic dietary risk based DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
ii. No mutagenic activity was upon exposure of 50% of the reference (703) 305–6224; e-mail address:
observed in the Salmonella/microsome population was estimated using CARES miller.joanne@epamail.epa.gov.
test. p-Methyl-phenethylamine was verison 1.3 to be 0.1% of the cPAD. The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
found at concentrations of <0.2% and excess lifetime cancer risk was
has been determined to not be estimated using CARES version 1.3 to be I. General Information
toxicologically significant. 1.64 x 10-8.
8. Endocrine disruption. No endocrine A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
disruption potential was observed in the 2. Infants and children. The You may be potentially affected by
2–generation reproduction study, population subgroup with the maximum this action if you an agricultural
developmental toxicity studies, estimated dietary exposure is children producer, food manufacturer, or
subchronic feeding studies, and chronic age 1 to 2 years old. For this subgroup, pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
feeding studies. and using the same assumptions as affected entities may include, but are
listed for the U.S. population, the not limited to:
C. Aggregate Exposure estimated chronic dietary risk is 0.5% of • Crop production (NAICS 111)
1. Dietary exposure. There are no the cPAD. • Animal production (NAICS 112)
registered uses of iprovalicarb in the F. International Tolerances • Food manufacturing (NAICS 311)
United States, and no registrations are • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
pending. Dietary exposure to Currently, there is no CODEX 32532)
iprovalicarb in the United States is maximum residue level (MRL) for This listing is not intended to be
limited to residues in/on imported grape iprovalicarb residues in/on tomatoes. exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
commodities and the proposed Italy is the only country for which there for readers regarding entities likely to be
imported tomato commodities. currently is a registration for the use of affected by this action. Other types of
i. Food. Exposure to iprovalicarb iprovalicarb on tomatoes and for which entities not listed in this unit could also
residues in food is limited to imported the additional active ingredient be affected. The North American
grape and tomato commodities. U.S. included in the formulation for Industrial Classification System
consumption of fresh grapes, grape resistance management purposes also (NAICS) codes have been provided to
juice, raisins and wine that is from has a U.S. tolerance. Italy has assist you and others in determining

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:00 Apr 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM 08APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 67 / Friday, April 8, 2005 / Notices 18005

whether this action might apply to docket. When a document is selected your name, mailing address, and an e-
certain entities. If you have any from the index list in EPA Dockets, the mail address or other contact
questions regarding the applicability of system will identify whether the information in the body of your
this action to a particular entity, consult document is available for viewing in comment. Also, include this contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER EPA’s electronic public docket. information on the outside of any disk
INFORMATION CONTACT. Although, not all docket materials may or CD ROM you submit, and in any
be available electronically, you may still cover letter accompanying the disk or
B. How Can I Get Copies of this
access any of the publicly available CD ROM. This ensures that you can be
Document and Other Related
docket materials through the docket identified as the submitter of the
Information?
facility identified in Unit I.B. EPA comment and allows EPA to contact you
1. Docket. EPA has established an intends to work towards providing in case EPA cannot read your comment
official public docket for this action electronic access to all of the publicly due to technical difficulties or needs
under docket ID number OPP–2005– available docket materials through further information on the substance of
0089. The official public docket consists EPA’s electronic public docket. your comment. EPA’s policy is that EPA
of the documents specifically referenced For public commenters, it is will not edit your comment, and any
in this action, any public comments important to note that EPA’s policy is identifying or contact information
received, and other information related that public comments, whether provided in the body of a comment will
to this action. Although, a part of the submitted electronically or on paper, be included as part of the comment that
official docket, the public docket does will be made available for public is placed in the official public docket,
not include Confidential Business viewing in EPA’s electronic public and made available in EPA’s electronic
Information (CBI) or other information docket as EPA receives them and public docket. If EPA cannot read your
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. without change, unless the comment comment due to technical difficulties
The official public docket is the contains copyrighted material, CBI, or and cannot contact you for clarification,
collection of materials that is available other information whose disclosure is EPA may not be able to consider your
for public viewing at the Public restricted by statute. When EPA comment.
Information and Records Integrity identifies a comment containing i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA’s
Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall copyrighted material, EPA will provide electronic public docket to submit
#2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This a reference to that material in the comments to EPA electronically is
docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to version of the comment that is placed in EPA’s preferred method for receiving
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, EPA’s electronic public docket. The comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets
excluding legal holidays. The docket entire printed comment, including the at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/, and
telephone number is (703) 305–5805. copyrighted material, will be available follow the online instructions for
2. Electronic access. You may access in the public docket. submitting comments. Once in the
this Federal Register document Public comments submitted on system, select ‘‘search,’’ and then key in
electronically through the EPA Internet computer disks that are mailed or docket ID number OPP–2005–0089. The
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at delivered to the docket will be system is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. transferred to EPA’s electronic public system, which means EPA will not
An electronic version of the public docket. Public comments that are know your identity, e-mail address, or
docket is available through EPA’s mailed or delivered to the docket will be other contact information unless you
electronic public docket and comment scanned and placed in EPA’s electronic provide it in the body of your comment.
system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA public docket. Where practical, physical ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by
Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/ objects will be photographed, and the e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov,
to submit or view public comments, photograph will be placed in EPA’s Attention: Docket ID number OPP–
access the index listing of the contents electronic public docket along with a 2005–0089. In contrast to EPA’s
of the official public docket, and to brief description written by the docket electronic public docket, EPA’s e-mail
access those documents in the public staff. system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
docket that are available electronically. system. If you send an e-mail comment
Although, not all docket materials may C. How and to Whom Do I Submit directly to the docket without going
be available electronically, you may still Comments? through EPA’s electronic public docket,
access any of the publicly available You may submit comments EPA’s e-mail system automatically
docket materials through the docket electronically, by mail, or through hand captures your e-mail address. E-mail
facility identified in Unit I.B.1. Once in delivery/courier. To ensure proper addresses that are automatically
the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate captured by EPA’s e-mail system are
the appropriate docket ID number. docket ID number in the subject line on included as part of the comment that is
Certain types of information will not the first page of your comment. Please placed in the official public docket, and
be placed in the EPA Dockets. ensure that your comments are made available in EPA’s electronic
Information claimed as CBI and other submitted within the specified comment public docket.
information whose disclosure is period. Comments received after the iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit
restricted by statute, which is not close of the comment period will be comments on a disk or CD ROM that
included in the official public docket, marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to you mail to the mailing address
will not be available for public viewing consider these late comments. If you identified in Unit I.C.2. These electronic
in EPA’s electronic public docket. EPA’s wish to submit CBI or information that submissions will be accepted in
policy is that copyrighted material will is otherwise protected by statute, please WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid
not be placed in EPA’s electronic public follow the instructions in Unit I.D. Do the use of special characters and any
docket but will be available only in not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit form of encryption.
printed, paper form in the official public CBI or information protected by statute. 2. By mail. Send your comments to:
docket. To the extent feasible, publicly 1. Electronically. If you submit an Public Information and Records
available docket materials will be made electronic comment as prescribed in this Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office
available in EPA’s electronic public unit, EPA recommends that you include of Pesticide Programs (OPP),

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:00 Apr 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM 08APN1
18006 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 67 / Friday, April 8, 2005 / Notices

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 6. Make sure to submit your residues of the herbicide chemical
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, comments by the deadline in this flumioxazin, 2-[7-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-3-
DC 20460–0001, Attention: Docket ID notice. oxo-4-(2-propynyl)-2H-1,4-benzoxazin-
number OPP–2005–0089. 7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, 6-yl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-
3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver be sure to identify the docket ID number 1,3(2H)-dione, in or on strawberry at
your comments to: Public Information assigned to this action in the subject 0.10 parts per million (ppm). EPA has
and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), line on the first page of your response. determined that the petitions contain
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), You may also provide the name, date, data or information regarding the
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. and Federal Register citation. elements set forth in section 408(d)(2) of
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St., the FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully
II. What Action is the Agency Taking?
Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID evaluated the sufficiency of the
number OPP–2005–0089. Such EPA has received a pesticide petition submitted data at this time or whether
deliveries are only accepted during the as follows proposing the establishment the data support granting of the petition.
docket’s normal hours of operation as and/or amendment of regulations for Additional data may be needed before
identified in Unit I.B.1. residues of a certain pesticide chemical EPA rules on the petition.
in or on various food commodities
D. How Should I Submit CBI to the under section 408 of the Federal Food, A. Residue Chemistry
Agency? Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 1. Plant metabolism. The metabolism
Do not submit information that you U.S.C. 346a. EPA has determined that of flumioxazin is adequately understood
consider to be CBI electronically this petition contains data or for the purpose of the proposed
through EPA’s electronic public docket information regarding the elements set tolerances.
or by e-mail. You may claim forth in FFDCA section 408(d)(2); 2. Analytical method. Practical
information that you submit to EPA as however, EPA has not fully evaluated analytical methods for detecting and
CBI by marking any part or all of that the sufficiency of the submitted data at measuring levels of flumioxazin have
information as CBI (if you submit CBI this time or whether the data support been developed and validated in/on all
on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside granting of the petition. Additional data appropriate agricultural commodities
of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then may be needed before EPA rules on the and respective processing fractions. The
identify electronically within the disk or petition. LOQ of flumioxazin in the methods is
CD ROM the specific information that is 0.02 ppm which will allow monitoring
List of Subjects of food with residues at the levels
CBI). Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with Environmental protection, proposed for the tolerances.
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. Agricultural commodities, Feed 3. Magnitude of residues. Residue
additives, Food additives, Pesticides data on strawberry have been submitted
In addition to one complete version of
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping which adequately support the requested
the comment that includes any
requirements. tolerance.
information claimed as CBI, a copy of
the comment that does not contain the Dated: March 22, 2005. B. Toxicological Profile
information claimed as CBI must be Lois Rossi, The toxicological profile for
submitted for inclusion in the public Director, Registration Division, Office of flumioxazin which supports this
docket and EPA’s electronic public Pesticide Programs. petition for tolerances was published in
docket. If you submit the copy that does the Federal Register on March 31, 2004
Summary of Petition
not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM, (69 FR 16823)(FRL–7351–2).
mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM The petitioner’s summary of the
clearly that it does not contain CBI. pesticide petition is printed below as C. Aggregate Exposure
Information not marked as CBI will be required by FFDCA section 408(d)(3). 1. Dietary exposure. Acute and
included in the public docket and EPA’s The summary of the petition was chronic dietary analyses were
electronic public docket without prior prepared by Interregional Research conducted to estimate exposure to
notice. If you have any questions about Project Number 4 (IR–4), and represents potential flumioxazin residues in/on the
CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, the view of the petitioner. The petition following crops: Peanuts, soybeans, and
please consult the person listed under summary announces the availability of cottonseed oil (existing tolerances);
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. a description of the analytical methods grapes, almond, pistachio, and
available to EPA for the detection and sugarcane, vegetable, tuberous and corm
E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare measurement of the pesticide chemical
My Comments for EPA? (Subgroup 1C), mint, and fruit, pome
residues or an explanation of why no (Group 11) and fruit, stone (Group 12)
You may find the following such method is needed. (tolerances pending); asparagus,
suggestions helpful for preparing your Interregional Research Project Number vegetable, bulb (Group 3), leaf petioles
comments: 4 (IR–4) (Subgroup 4B), dried shelled peas and
1. Explain your views as clearly as beans Subgroup 6C), vegetables, fruiting
possible. PP 4E6845 (Group 8), vegetables, cucurbit (Group
2. Describe any assumptions that you EPA has received a pesticide petition 9), berries (Group 13), and nut, tree
used. (4E6845) from Interregional Research (Group 14)(tolerances to be proposed in
3. Provide copies of any technical Project Number 4 (IR–4), Rutgers, State the future); and strawberry (tolerances
information and/or data you used that University of New Jersey, 681 U.S. proposed in the current petition). The
support your views. Highway No. 1 S. North New Cumulative and Aggregate Risk
4. If you estimate potential burden or Brunswick, NJ 08902, proposing, Evaluation System (CARES) Version 2.0
costs, explain how you arrived at the pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal was used to conduct these assessments.
estimate that you provide. Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), These Tier I assessments used issued
5. Provide specific examples to 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part and proposed tolerances, default
illustrate your concerns. 180, by establishing a tolerance for processing factors, and the assumption

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:00 Apr 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM 08APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 67 / Friday, April 8, 2005 / Notices 18007

of 100% crop treated. No adjustments adults and children, respectively. The population and various non-child/infant
were made for common washing, 56–day GENEEC concentration population subgroups will utilize at
cooking or preparation practices. predicted in the simulated pond water most 8.0% of the c-PAD. Addition of the
Exposure estimates for water were made was 0.34 ppb. Chronic exposure from worse case, dietary exposure from water
based upon modeling (GENEEC 1.2). this drinking water would be 0.0000097 (0.0000097 mg/kg/day) has no effect on
i. Food—a. Acute. The acute dietary and 0.000034 mg/kg/day for adults and this exposure. The Agency has no cause
exposure estimate of flumioxazin children, respectively; 0.17% of the c- for concern if total chronic residue
residues in food at the 99.9th percentile PAD of 0.02 mg/kg/day for children. contribution is less than 100% of the c-
for females 13–49 years old was Based on this worse case analysis, the PAD, because the PAD represents the
calculated to be, at most, 21.9% of the contribution of drinking water is level at or below which daily aggregate
acute population adjusted dose (a-PAD) negligible. exposure over a lifetime will not pose
with a margin of exposure (MOE) of 450. 2. Non-dietary exposure. Flumioxazin appreciable risk to human health.
This is the only population subgroup is proposed only for agricultural uses Therefore, it can be concluded that,
with an identified acute toxicity and no homeowner or turf uses. Thus, there is a reasonable certainty that no
endpoint. The a-PAD was defined as the no non-dietary risk assessment is harm will result to the overall U.S.
NOEL from an oral developmental study needed. population from aggregate, chronic
in rats and includes an uncertainty D. Cumulative Effects exposure to flumioxazin residues.
factor of 100 to account for intra-species
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) requires that 2. Infants and children—i. Safety
and inter-species variation (NOEL = 3
the Agency must consider ‘‘available factor for infants and children. EPA has
milligrams/kilogram body weight/day
information’’ concerning the cumulative determined that the special 10x SF to
(mg/kg bwt/day), a-PAD = 0.03 mg/kg/
effects of a particular pesticide’s protect infants and children should be
day).
b. Chronic dietary exposure. The residues and ‘‘other substances that removed as published in the Federal
chronic dietary exposure estimate of have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’ Register of March 31, 2004 (69 FR
flumioxazin residues in food at the 100th Available information in this context 16823) (FRL–7351–2). The FQPA factor
percentile was calculated to be, at most, include not only toxicity, chemistry, has been removed because
18.1% of the chronic population and exposure data, but also scientific developmental toxicity and offspring
adjusted dose (c-PAD) with a MOE of policies and methodologies for toxicity no observed adverse effect
understanding common mechanisms of levels/lowest adverse effect levels
550. The population subgroup with the
toxicity and conducting cumulative risk (NOAELs/LOAELs) are well
highest exposure was children 3–5 years
assessments. Although, the Agency has characterized; there is a well-defined
old. The c-PAD was defined as the no
some information in its files that may dose-response curve for the
observed effect level (NOEL) from a rat
turn out to be helpful in eventually cardiovascular effects; and the
2–year chronic/oncogenicity study and
determining whether a pesticide shares endpoints of concern used for overall
includes an uncertainty factor of 100 to
a common mechanism of toxicity with risk assessments are appropriate for the
account for intra-species inter-species
any other substances, EPA does not at route of exposure and population
variation (NOEL = 2 mg/kg bwt/day, c-
this time have the methodologies to subgroups.
PAD = 0.02 mg/kg/day).
resolve the complex scientific issues
ii. Drinking water. Since flumioxazin ii. Acute risk. No acute endpoint has
concerning common mechanism of
is applied outdoors to growing been identified for infants and children.
toxicity in a meaningful way for most
agricultural crops, the potential exists Therefore, no assessment of acute
registered pesticides.
for the parent or its metabolites to reach exposure from food to this subgroup is
ground or surface water that may be E. Safety Determination required.
used for drinking water. Because of the 1. U.S. population—i. Acute risk. The iii. Chronic risk. The potential chronic
physical properties of flumioxazin, it is potential acute exposure from food to exposure from food to children 3–5
unlikely that flumioxazin or its females 13–49 years old will utilize at years old (the most highly exposed
metabolites can leach to potable ground most 21.9% of the a-PAD. This is the child/infant subgroup) will utilize at
water. To quantify potential exposure only population subgroup with an most 18.1% of the c-PAD. Addition of
from drinking water, surface water identified acute toxicity endpoint. the worse case, dietary exposure from
concentrations for flumioxazin were Addition of the worse case, dietary water (0.000034 mg/kg/day) increases
estimated using GENEEC 1.2. Because exposure from water (0.00028 mg/kg/ this exposure at the 100th percentile to
KOC could not be measured directly in day) increases this exposure at the 99.9th 18.3% of the c-PAD. Therefore, it can be
adsorption-desorption studies because percentile to 22.8% of the a-PAD. The concluded that, there is a reasonable
of chemical stability, GENEEC values Agency has no cause for concern if total certainty that no harm will result to
representative of a range of KOC values acute residue contribution is less than infants and children from aggregate,
were modeled. The simulation that was 100% of the a-PAD, because the PAD chronic exposure to flumioxazin
selected for these exposure estimates represents the level at or below which residues.
used an average KOC of 385, indicating daily aggregate exposure over a lifetime
high mobility. The peak GENEEC will not pose appreciable risk to human F. International Tolerances
concentration predicted in the health. Therefore, it can be concluded Flumioxazin has not been evaluated
simulated pond water was 9.8 parts per that, there is a reasonable certainty that by the JMPR and there are no codex
billion (ppb). Using standard no harm will result to the overall U.S. maximum residue limits (MRL) for
assumptions about body weight and population from aggregate, acute flumioxazin. MRL values have been
water consumption, the acute exposure exposure to flumioxazin residues. established to allow the following uses
from this drinking water would be ii. Chronic risk. The potential chronic of flumioxazin in the following
0.00028 and 0.00098 mg/kg/day for exposure from food to the U.S. countries.

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:00 Apr 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM 08APN1
18008 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 67 / Friday, April 8, 2005 / Notices

Country Crop MRL (ppm)

Argentina Soybean Sunflower 0.015 0.02

Brazil Soybean 0.05

France Grape 0.05

Paraguay Soybean 0.015

South Africa Soybean Groundnut 0.02 0.02

Spain Soybean Peanut 0.05 0.05

[FR Doc. 05–6852 Filed 4–7–05; 8:45 am] • Food manufacturing (NAICS 311) access the index listing of the contents
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS of the official public docket, and to
32532) access those documents in the public
This listing is not intended to be docket that are available electronically.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION exhaustive, but rather provides a guide Although not all docket materials may
AGENCY for readers regarding entities likely to be be available electronically, you may still
affected by this action. Other types of access any of the publicly available
[OPP–2005–0016; FRL–7703–7]
entities not listed in this unit could also docket materials through the docket
Metconazole; Notice of Filing a be affected. The North American facility identified in Unit I.B.1. Once in
Pesticide Petition to Establish a Industrial Classification System the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in
Tolerance for a Certain Pesticide (NAICS) codes have been provided to the appropriate docket ID number.
Chemical in or on Food assist you and others in determining Certain types of information will not
whether this action might apply to be placed in the EPA Dockets.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection certain entities. If you have any Information claimed as CBI and other
Agency (EPA). questions regarding the applicability of information whose disclosure is
ACTION: Notice. this action to a particular entity, consult restricted by statute, which is not
the person listed under FOR FURTHER included in the official public docket,
SUMMARY: This notice announces the INFORMATION CONTACT.
will not be available for public viewing
initial filing of a pesticide petition
B. How Can I Get Copies of this in EPA’s electronic public docket. EPA’s
proposing the establishment of
Document and Other Related policy is that copyrighted material will
regulations for residues of a certain
Information? not be placed in EPA’s electronic public
pesticide chemical in or on various food
1. Docket. EPA has established an docket but will be available only in
commodities.
official public docket for this action printed, paper form in the official public
DATES: Comments, identified by docket docket. To the extent feasible, publicly
identification (ID) number OPP–2005– under docket ID number OPP–2005–
0016. The official public docket consists available docket materials will be made
0016, must be received on or before May available in EPA’s electronic public
9, 2005. of the documents specifically referenced
in this action, any public comments docket. When a document is selected
ADDRESSES: Comments may be received, and other information related from the index list in EPA Dockets, the
submitted electronically, by mail, or to this action. Although a part of the system will identify whether the
through hand delivery/courier. Follow official docket, the public docket does document is available for viewing in
the detailed instructions as provided in not include Confidential Business EPA’s electronic public docket.
Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY Information (CBI) or other information Although not all docket materials may
INFORMATION. whose disclosure is restricted by statute. be available electronically, you may still
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The official public docket is the access any of the publicly available
Mary Waller, Registration Division collection of materials that is available docket materials through the docket
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, for public viewing at the Public facility identified in Unit I.B.1. EPA
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Information and Records Integrity intends to work towards providing
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall electronic access to all of the publicly
DC 20460–0001; telephone number: #2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This available docket materials through
(703) 308–9354; e-mail address: docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to EPA’s electronic public docket.
waller.mary@epa.gov. 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, For public commenters, it is
excluding legal holidays. The docket important to note that EPA’s policy is
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
telephone number is (703) 305–5805. that public comments, whether
I. General Information 2. Electronic access. You may access submitted electronically or in paper,
this Federal Register document will be made available for public
A. Does this Action Apply to Me? viewing in EPA’s electronic public
electronically through the EPA Internet
You may be potentially affected by under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at docket as EPA receives them and
this action if you are an agricultural http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. without change, unless the comment
producer, food manufacturer, or An electronic version of the public contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially docket is available through EPA’s other information whose disclosure is
affected entities may include, but are electronic public docket and comment restricted by statute. When EPA
not limited to: system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA identifies a comment containing
• Crop production (NAICS 111) Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/ copyrighted material, EPA will provide
• Animal production (NAICS 112) to submit or view public comments, a reference to that material in the

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:00 Apr 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM 08APN1

Anda mungkin juga menyukai