politics as well as culture. The specific tactics analyzed here are diverse, ranging from
culture jamming, sousveillance, media hoaxing, adbusting, subvertising, street art, to
hacktivism, billboard liberation, and urban guerilla, to name but a few. Though indebted
to the artistic and political movements of the past, this form of activism brings a novel
dimension to public protest with its insistence on humor, playfulness, and confusion. This
book attempts to grasp both the old and new aspects of contemporary activist practices,
as well as their common characteristics and internal varieties. It attempts to open up
space for the acknowledgement of the ways in which contemporary capitalism affects all
our lives, and for the reflection on possible modes of struggling with it. It focuses on the
possibilities that different activist tactics enable, the ways in which those may be innovative
or destructive, as well as on their complications and dilemmas.
Aylin Kuryel is a doctoral candidate in Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA).
Her dissertation focuses on the image politics of nationalism. She is also involved in artist/
activist collectives and film-making.
Cultural Activism
Editors
No 21 [2010]
Cultural Activism
The encounter between the insights of political, social and critical theory on the one
hand and activist visions and struggles on the other is urgent and appealing. The essays
collected here all explore such a confrontational collaboration, testing its limits and
productiveness, in theory as well as in practice. In a mutually beneficial relationship,
theoretical concepts are rethought through activist practices, while those activist practices
are developed with the help of the insights of critical theory. This volume brings scholars
and activists together in the hope of establishing a productive dialogue between the
theorizations of the intricacies of our times and the subversive practices that deal with
them.
THAMYRIS INTERSECTING No 21
Cultural Activism
Begm zden Frat is an Istanbul based activist. Besides, she is Assistant Professor
at the Department of Sociology at the Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University in Istanbul, Turkey.
ISBN 978-90-420-2981-1
Thamyris 21 Cover.indd 1
789042 029811
Rodopi
24-08-10 07:54
Introduction
Cultural Activism: Practices,
Dilemmas, and Possibilities
Begm zden Frat and
Aylin Kuryel
On November 12, 2008, commuters in New York City, Los Angeles, and a few other
US cities were informed of the end of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan on the front
page of The New York Times, which was handed out in the streets for free. The paper
also reported that a national health care system was to be established, corporate
lobbying was soon to be abolished, the maximum wage law had succeeded, and all
public universities were to become tuition-free. The advertisements were somewhat
unusual. The ExxonMobil one read: Times have changed. Oil fields have reverted to
a newly independent Iraq and Congress has mandated Fair Trade, a system in which
most profits go not to brokers, stockholders, and a small management circle, but
flow directly to those who produce. Exxon is excited about helping to do things
betternot just because its the law, but because Exxon has always been about
innovation (http://www.nytimes-se.com). The Corrections: For the Record section
included a self-reflective gesture when The Times apologized for underreporting the
effects and dangers of media consolidation, perhaps due to our own efforts at media
consolidation: The Times owns almost two dozen regional newspapers, a number of
television and radio stations, and partial shares in the Red Sox and the Discovery
Channel and declared that it will voluntarily trust-bust itself, thus contributing to the
independence of American journalism (http://www.nytimes-se.com).
To their dismay, careful readers would realize that these items were news from the
future, as the edition was post-dated July 4, 2009. The subsequent press release
declared that the paper was a hoax, an elaborate operation six months in the planning by a diverse range of groups, including The Yes Men, the Anti-Advertising Agency,
CODEPINK, United for Peace and Justice, Not An Alternative, May First/People Link,
Introduction | 9
Blissettt and Sonja Brnzels, who co-authored the Handbuch der Komunikationsguerilla
(Handbook of Communication Guerilla):
Guerrilla communication doesnt focus on arguments and facts like most leaflets,
brochures, slogans or banners. In its own way, it inhabits a militant political position; it
is direct action in the space of social communication. But different from other militant
positions (stone meets shop window); it doesnt aim to destroy the codes and signs of
power and control, but to distort and disfigure their meanings as a means of counteracting the omnipotent prattling of power. Communication guerrillas do not intend to
occupy, interrupt or destroy the dominant channels of communication, but to detourn
and subvert the messages transported. (http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/
nettime-l-9809/msg00044.html)
The practice of subverting dominant messages transmitted by hegemonic powers is,
no doubt, hardly new. It is inspired from and indebted to previous avant-garde artistic
and political movements of the pastfrom Dada and Situationist International to the
Yippies and the Diggers.3 The Situationist connoisseur Ken Knabb, for instance,
points out that The Times spoof is an example of the situationist tactic of detournement, that is, the reuse of preexisting aesthetic elements, media forms and corporate images to convey opposingand often wittymessages (www.bopsecrets.org).
According to Guy Debord, the strength of the detourned object stems from creating
a double meaning, from the enrichment of most of the terms by the coexistence
within them of their old senses and their new, immediate senses (55). While the
spoof appears not to have taken seriously Debords advice that dtournement is less
effective the more it approaches a rational reply, it nevertheless wittily fools around
with the masters tool to offer a subversive message just like the historical
pranksters intended to do (Debord & Wolman 10).
However, it should be noted that, even though there is a similarity between forms of
subversion employed by contemporary cultural activists and the historical avant-garde,
the socio-cultural contexts within which they operate differ significantly. The novelty of
the new forms of action is that they operate, albeit loosely, within a global movement
that has been called the alter-globalization movement, movement of movements, or
the global justice movement. It has been argued that the movement fully materialized
for the first time in the 1999 protests against the Third Ministerial meeting of the World
Trade Organization (WTO) in Seattle. Ten years after its debut, the movement is still
discussed with regard to the often incommensurable identities of the activists, as well
as the diversity of tactics they purport. This variety is argued to be one of the strongest
features of the movement. Anarchists, communists, ecologists, trade unionists, farmers, nuns, queers, and many others are involved in the decentralized struggle. Political
objectives range from opposing neoliberal domination and the militarization of everyday
life, and privatization of public utilities, to sexist, racist, and anti-environmentalist
Introduction | 11
policies, grand plans of the IMF or WTO, media manipulation of the consumerist society,
and enclosure of land. It is hard to say if, from then on, the political brisk caused a drastic and irreversible change in the world. But it is even harder to say that it will not. The
questions concerning the growth and the success of the movement generally fluctuate
depending upon the current situation and the ways in which the notion of victory is
understood by various agents.4
While the understanding of victory is highly contested within the movement, the
means to reach it are even more diverse. Perhaps one common characteristic of the
tactics employed, particularly during summit protests, is that they tend to be creative,
colorful, joyful, carnivalesque, and humorous. These features often used for describing
the current state of the movement, however, should not be seen as mere blissful
expressions that spice up demonstrations and rallies. In line with the Bakhtinian notion
of the medieval carnival, to which many texts of the movement explicitly refer, these are
ludic instances through which the people confront economic and political oppression.5 The giant puppets of the battle of Seattle, the Silver & Pink march during the
IMF and WB summit in Prague in 2000, and the half-naked plunge of the notoriously militant South Korean farmers during the WTO summit in Hong Kong in 2005 are not
merely experiments in finding different languages of confrontation which communicate
a radically different activist image, confuse the police, attract media attention, and lure
the public into their causes, but also unique attempts at shutting them down.6
Such methods of confrontation with ruling regimes reclaim creativity and imagination,
notions conventionally associated with the figure of the artist and members of the socalled creative class, as their moving forces. They intermingle art, activism, politics, and
performance. The aviation campaign by the German Kein Mensch ist illegal (No One Is
Illegal) network against the complicity of Lufthansa Airlines in helping the German state
deport refugees is a sophisticated example of such interaction. As an image-polluting
operation, the campaign started by promoting Lufthansas new campaign, deportation
class, offering new lower-priced fares for the reduced level of comfort passengers might
experience sitting next to people in handcuffs with tape over their mouths. The campaign
started with flyers and a spoof website mimicking the look and feeling of the typography
of the companys advertisements. In addition, the activists intervened in annual shareholders meetings, press conferences, and an international tourism fair by impersonating Lufthansa employees to promote their new campaign, held a touring poster
exhibition, organized an online demonstration on the Lufthansa servers, and staged a
deportation performance at an airport. Through the collaboration of political activists,
theoreticians, media activists, fine artists, musicians, and designers, the campaign
employed an amalgamation of street theater, tactical media, subvertisement, and electronic disturbance, and finally managed to force Lufthansa to give up deportation.
While the critique of the overall achievement of such campaigns is withheldas
Germany kept on deporting refugees using mostly charter airline companiesthe
Lufthansa actions demonstrate the efficiency of direct actions that prank and subvert
the system through cultural means. Such interventions have become increasingly
popular in recent years and have contaminated different areas of struggle in diverse
regions of the world. The infamous creative non-violent resistance of the Bilin villagers against the construction of the Israeli Separation wall and the settlements,
the Carnival of the Oppressed held in Nigeria against multinational oil companies
such as Shell and Evron, and the annual militruzim (military-tourism) festivals
organized by anti-militarist groups in Turkey exemplify the global epidemic character
of cultural activism.7 Similarly, novel combat icons such as the rebel clown, the sambatista, the precarious superhero, the hacker, the adbuster, the pie thrower, the
radical cheerleader, and the libertarian prankster, who attack the system in myriad
forms, make the scene and take it to the streets. Having said this, one should also
note that the notion of creativity at times exerts certain tyranny over activists urging
them to be creative constantly. There is a certain risk that this compulsion of using
novel and creative activist methods culminates into a sort of creativity for the sake
of creativity stance and tend to drift away from tactical thinking. For instance, nowadays, almost every street action, regardless of their form and aim, includes colorful
elements such as music, puppets, costumes, or masks. While such touches have
a strong expressive character and still manage to attract attention, they tend to
become repetitive and lose their political efficacy when they do not create tactical
confrontation. Hence, the Bakhtinian carnival to which the movement frequently
refers, can easily give way to a contained and predictable parade fascinated by its
own creativity, when it is not concerned with generating site and context specific
situations sustaining a continuous political engagement. As such, cultural activism
ends up reproducing what it initially attempts to challenge by creating a parade in
which protesters and authorities perform their ascribed roles and confirm the existing order. This book attempts to grasp predicaments of cultural activism by venturing
into the common characteristics of and varieties within existing activist practices as
well as their shortcomings. By doing so, it hopes to opens up a space for contemplation about the ways that contemporary capitalism and power relations affect our
lives, and the possible ways and different levels of struggling with it.
This volume
The encounter between the insights of political, social and critical theory and activist
visions, suggestions, and actions is both urgent and appealing. In this volume, we
aim to explore this confrontational collaboration, its limits and productiveness, both
in theory and in practice. It is a mutually beneficial relationship, to rethink and
explore theoretical concepts and tools through practice, and comprehend and
develop political practice with the help of the insights of critical theories. Therefore,
this volume brings scholars and activists together so as to provide various responses
Introduction | 13
contextualize practices, both in their specificity and in a broader framework, by considering their predecessors, their temporal and theoretical neighbors, allied or hostile relatives. By doing so, various manifestations of activist practices in different
localities, as well as their transnational qualities are elucidated.
The style of writing within and among the articles oscillates from academic to
everyday language, from theoretical debates to almost journalistic accounts of
the actual events, which suits the nature of the topics that the book deals with.
There are overlapping conceptualizations and discussions, as well as opposing ones,
which is an unavoidable and necessary quality regarding the subject matter of this
compilation.
The first essay entitled The Notion of Irony in Cultural Activism by Gavin Grindon
focuses on the notion of irony so as to elaborate the different and sometimes
ambiguous assumptions and definitions around cultural activism. The notion of irony
has a rich theoretical accumulation around it. Grindon goes into extensive discussion
about how irony and desire are conceptualized by several writers such as Marx,
Hegel, and Nietzsche. He argues that cultural activism more often supposes a
Nietzschean understanding of desire, not as a lack becoming present but as already
active and productive. Therefore, activist practices often do not seek to awaken passive subjects, but to have an organizational role in relation to the already active
desires of the subjects. He looks at A/Traverso, a part of the Italian autonomia movement that reached its peak in 1977, and explores the cultural-activist use of irony with
the help of theoretical writings of Guattari and his notion of transversality. His argument about the necessity to look at the notion of irony is a path leading to less utopian
and more complex possibilities of cultural activism. He also draws attention to the
existing tendency of a simplistic and celebratory understanding of Bakthinian carnival,
laughter, and play with authority, which in turn yields to a revolutionary romanticism.
The notion of romanticism is further problematized in A. K. Thompsons essay
entitled The Resonance of Romanticism: Activist Art and the Bourgeois Horizon.
Thompson takes an unusual route and explores the connection between twenty-first
century struggles against globalization and capitalism and the nineteenth-century
explosion of the Romantic Movement. He focuses on the visual politics of graphic
novelist and illustrator Eric Drooker and street artist Banksy whose works strongly
resonate in the contemporary movement. According to Thompson, features such as
the lack of perspectival realism, the element of identification and mythic valorization,
the use of dream state as the representation of a better future that exists in the
visual repertoire of Drooker, and the idea of re-enchanting the world and sentimentality in Banksys images purport the visual tradition of Romanticism. He focuses on the
movements identification with these images and elaborates on the recursive reiteration of a rebellious impulse intrinsic to bourgeois experience. By discussing
the relationship between the emergence of bourgeoisie and its negative other
Introduction | 15
romanticism, Thompson argues for the epistemic continuity between social movements and the romantic tradition. This article provides significant insights on the
recursive and ambivalent characteristics of romanticism, as well as of the relationship between romanticism and resistance.
While both Grindon and Thompson focus on the paradoxical tendencies within
activist practices in general by looking at the use of irony and the representational policies respectively, some other articles focus more on the complexities of specific activist
tactics. Marco Deseriiss article Lots of Money Because I am Many: The Luther Blissett
Project and the Multiple-Use Name Strategy introduces the case of madeup artist
Darko Maver who occupied the media during the Balkan Wars of the 1990s, with its
slowly unfolding fraud performances. This was one of the major pranks of the Luther
Blissett Project, which has built its mysterious identity upon the staging of fake events.
The name Luther Blisset became a multiple personality used by several artists and
activists. The analysis of the Luther Blissett Project reveals in great detail the common
interest in pranks, frauds, pseudonyms, fake fabrications, media targeting, and manipulation in projects that are at the juncture of art and activism. This interest is directly
linked with the political objectives of such projects that require a radical undermining of
the notions of individual identity in their methods. Deseriiss article points out that the
notion of individuality and authorship are not simply rejected by activist/artists, but
played upon. This tactic deciphers the intrinsic qualities these notions carry and it gives
significant hints on the working mechanisms of subversive practices.
The subsequent essay The Separation Wall in Palestine: Artists love to hate it!
by Ronen Eidelman explores the integration of artistic productions into the activist
realm. It deals with the multi-layered issue of potentials and dilemmas of the transition between art and politics by looking at a specific and sensitive case. Eidelman
talks about several artistic/political projects that have taken place since the beginning of the building of the separation wall by the Israeli government in the Palestinian
territories. The wall has been a significant point of focus in political art in parallel to
politics. He argues every artistic project in its singularity and in its relation to documenting, criticizing, condemning, and responding to the wall that has been a main
focus of political art in the last few years. The potential of these artistic/political
practices, such as delaying or blocking the building of the rest of the wall, educating
the public through the wall, and decreasing the separation by increasing the communication between the two sides are elaborated on in Eidelmans article; as well as the
dilemmas and limitations of these practices, such as making the presence of the wall
stronger by dealing with it, its fetishization by the artists, and commodification of the
wall with the help of these art projects.
The Situationist International (SI) is perhaps the most cited political/artistic group
in the essays collected in this volume. They combined their critique of art and everyday life with an unorthodox Marxist critique of society to formulate a revolutionary
program and became effective, both in their time and in the present day. Thinking
about contemporary activist practices in relation to SI provides fruitful insights into
various facets of contemporary activism since it has been inspired by several of their
ideas and tactics. Deseriiss looks at how Situationist concepts such as psychogeography and deriv find their way into the pranks of Luther Blisset that aim at
undermining the individual identity of the artist or political subject.
One of the other two articles that look at other aspects of the relationship
between Situationist practices and the contemporary groups at stake, in relation to
a number of theorists, is Anja Kanngiesers Breaking Out of the Specialist Ghetto:
Performative Encounters as Participatory Praxis in Radical Politics. Kanngieser
gives an in-depth account of Berlin Dadaists, Situationist International, and the
German activist group Umsonst in relation to one other. She discusses how Dadaists
rejected early representational forms in art in favor of insurrectionary performative
encounters and the kind of difficulties they have faced in fulfilling their goals.
Situationist International was less negatively programmed than Dada, in her terms.
They were seeking ways of constructing situations for the deterritorialization of the
spectacle that mediates social relations between individuals. Kanngieser makes efficient use of Deleuze and Guattaris works in her analysis of Dadaist realization of art
and Situationist realization of constructing situations. She explores the question of
whether these practices could become correlative to political life, as they wanted to
happen. She discusses the practices of German activist group Umsonst in light of
these previous examples and theorizes the possibilities of performativity in insurrectionary action and a transition from an ethic axial to praxis form. Her discussion
of the limitations of previous groups sheds light on the potential value that she sees
in particular forms of contemporary political engagement.
Emrah Irzk, on the contrary, examines previous political/activist groups such as
SI in order to reveal the inadequacies and restrictions of existing activist groups. In
his article A Proposal for Grounded Cultural Activism: Communication Strategies,
Adbusters and Social Change, he directs a critical look at activist tactics of the culture jamming group Adbusters, specifically at its use of the tactic detournement,
which has appeared as the agit-prop of contemporary cultural activism. Adbusters
is one of the most popular cultural jamming groups and is chosen here because
some of the pitfalls that cultural activism tends to have are best seen by analyzing
Adbusters practices and discourses. Irzk argues the theoretical and practical inadequacies of these activist strategies in relation to the issues such as class awareness, money as a means in activist struggle, and the prevalence of the discourse of
war with the consumer society. He compares the tactics and more general visions
of SI and todays culture jamming, and efficiently interrogates the existence and
effectiveness of an alternative/constructive political program and subjectivity in culture jammings political agenda.
Introduction | 17
and everyday life. Exploring theoretical concepts further in light of political acts and
understanding existing political acts in light of theoretical discussions is crucial to
reaching better practical formulations for the future. Therefore, the contributors are
concerned with rethinking and exploring theoretical concepts and tools through practice, and comprehending and developing political practice with the help of theories,
both for a better understanding of theory and practice, and more importantly, for new
practical transformatory critical suggestions for our times.
We have asked several contemporary artist and activist groups, mostly the ones
that are not mentioned in the articles, to briefly describe themselves and some of
their actions. This inventory of practices at the end of the book provides further
information about existing groups and forms of action. We hope that this inventory
will inspire your imagination.
The objective of this volume is to provide a general understanding of the dynamics and travel of the conceptualization of the existing world and the possibilities of its
alteration through political engagement. It obviously does not provide packaged formulas to transform the world; neither does it cause the motivation for further action
to be mired in theory that sometimes tends to be confusing and despairing. As we
have mentioned before, the uneasiness shared by the contributors concerning the
course of society, as well as the role and effectiveness of activist practices in it, is
the glue that bring these articles together. Yet, the inspiration and hope surrounding
present and future possibilities is, then, its unglue in order for the words to be
lifted from the book and taken to the streets again.
Introduction | 19
Works Cited
Bakhtin, M. M. Rabelais and His World. Trans. H.
Iswolsky. Cambridge, MA: MIT P., 1968.
Notes
1. The special edition is located at
http://www.nytimes-se.com. The press
release may be found at http://void.nothingness
.org/archives/situationist/display/30232/
index.php (12 November 2008).
2. See www.theyesmen.org. For an in-depth
insiders account on how identity correction works
see, identity net.plays (2002) by the Yes Men.
3. For more on Dada and the Situationist
International, see the essay by Anja Kannsieger
in this volume. The Diggers were a radical
community-action group performing guerilla
theater from 196668 in San Francisco.
Founded in 1967, the Yippies (Youth
International Party) came about as an offshoot of
1960s the free-speech and anti-war movement in
the United States. They performed street theater
and political pranks.
4. On the notion of victory, see the first issue
of Turbulence published for the G8 summit
held in Heiligendamm, Germany in 2007
http://turbulence.org.uk/turbulence-1/,
A tale of two victories? Or, why winning becomes
Gavin Grindon
spectacle
(Duncombe),
interventionism
(Sholette
and
Thompson),
revolutionary Dadaist and Surrealist avant-garde to the present. Such ideas are also
indebted to the fact that this avant-garde develops its own theoretical engagement
with this approach and its revolutionary potential in the theory of revolution-asfestival, taken up and reworked by various groups and thinkers throughout the
twentieth century, which contemporary activist groups often also take as a central
point of influence.3 In both critical writing on such activism and in the perspectives of
activists themselves, the notions of irony and festival have often been interpreted
simply in terms of joy and laughter, of a riotous table-turning and ridiculing of authority. In academic discourse, the English-language reception of the writing of Mikhail
Bakhtin, which has not only emphasized his notion of carnival, but also often
employed it in an unexamined and even tokenistic fashion, is perhaps much to blame
here. However, within the activist milieu, out of which groups such as Reclaim the
Streets emerged, we might also look to the influential, but often rather simplistic
formulations of Post-Left Anarchy, in the writing of Hakim Bey and Bob Black, which
privileged laughter, laziness, and the spontaneous revolt of desire in terms which
were often excessively simple.
Such perspectives are often limited in terms of practical, tactical action and
engagement, and fall back into an enthusiastic, celebratory assertion of the power of
laughter, or a call for new inspiring myths, radical faith, or revolutionary romanticism.4
However, if we look again at the notion of irony which is central to these critical
perspectives, we can make out the emergence of a number of other more difficult,
but less utopian, dynamics and possibilities for cultural activism. Most of the
attempts to define cultural activism cited above emphasize reversal and irony as fundamental to its workings as a means of transcendence. However, the very notion of
a revolutionary, transcendent table-turning has its own rather illustrious philosophical lineage.
The World Turned Upside Down
Friedrich Engels famously claimed that Marx set Hegels upside-down system upon
its feet. This occurs most clearly in Marxs debt to Hegels master-slave dialectic, in
which Marx draws out the dialectic between the working class and capital by which
the working class discovers its own separate creative power. A detailed account of
the various twists and turns of Hegels logic exceeds the bounds of this article, but a
short summary is possible. The dialectical notion of self-overcoming has its origins
in the famous chapter of Hegels The Phenomenology of Spirit entitled Lordship and
Bondage. He argues, broadly, that the subject finds that self-consciousness exists
for a self-consciousness. Only so is it, in fact, self-consciousness (110). He must
therefore seek a mutually self-affirming relation with another subject. But having
found it, this equilibrium is only temporary. These subjects wills to recognition are
mutually exclusive and throw them into a struggle against each other. This struggle
22 | Gavin Grindon
24 | Gavin Grindon
26 | Gavin Grindon
28 | Gavin Grindon
was something that religions or philosophy tried to administer (Pavon). Now that
the anguish over precarity is also a social issue, we find that in moments of engagement with specific social problems we also confront the fundamental sublime experience of our precariousness and the meaning of our lives: We experience in social
situationslike the crisis in Argentina two years ago, or the life of immigrants that
come to Europeat the same time a concrete social economic problem and a relation with the world that appears to us with all its drama (Pavon).
This is a new form of sublime relation. The joy of the sublime is no longer a matter of the safe separation of the subject from the object of terror by its social security. The joy of this sublime, if it is to be anything but the terror of a precarity enforced
by state and capital which destroys the subject, is to be found in the subjects
engagement with and undoing of these relations, by transversally composing other
relations. Sublime joy is now not a matter of safety, but of the dangerous leaps
which compose alternative, heterogeneous relations. Writing in Italy in the 1970s,
Antonio Negri develops a similar point in Domination and Sabotage by quoting
Epicurus, at the same time, we must laugh and philosophise (259). But this laughter is bound up with the difficulty of struggle: It is terror that is open to the possibility of being comical [. . .]. Repression is not credible. Its spectacular form is
paradoxical and ridiculous [. . .]. To laugh at repression is not to defend oneself but
to define it, facing it as it presents itself [. . .]. But when you begin to philosophise
you notice that this detachment is actually contempt (259).
This leap is no longer the impossible total sublime moment of a subjects tragic,
heroic assertion upon the world through myth, but as a difficult space (or rather, as
relations which traverse a space) of a heterogeneity of values composed by heterogeneous means. More recently, this notion of an ironic, tragic joy has been explored
in a specific context by Colectivo Situaciones. As a collective from Buenos Aires working as part of the new radical currents which emerged in Argentina, they argue that
sadness is a reactive dynamic of limited possibilities and closure: According to
Spinoza, sadness consists in being separated from our potencia (powers-to-act).
Among us, political sadness often took the form of impotence and melancholy in the
face of the growing distance between that social experiment and the political imagination capable of carrying it out (Colectivo Situaciones 130134).
Asserting a need for a politics within and against sadness, rather than a sad,
reactive politics, they argue, among other things, that politicizing sadness entails a
move beyond the reductive binary of victory-defeat. In a rather different context, a
recent notorious cultural-activist group, CIRCA, has attempted just such a transversal
politicization. Who, after all, engages with the dialectic of sadness and laughter better than a clown? Drawing on the long genealogy which begins with the shaman and
the fool, the image of whom is at the origin of the notion of turning the world upside
down, they demonstrate well that to open up transversal social-affective relations
30 | Gavin Grindon
should not only be understood in terms of a delirious, ecstatic joy, but in terms of a
supportive, open engagement with sadness.
Articles elsewhere in this volume deal with CIRCA in greater detail, so it will suffice here to try and sketch out their particular transversality. Confronting riot police in
the form of a clown presents the activist as a bare, vulnerable, and absurd subject.
The activist has nowhere to go, and no pretences to shield him/herself. But this
tragic absurdity breaks down the fourth wall between the activist and the police, who
are ironically drawn into a relation with the activist in so far as they are also made
uncomfortable by this ridiculous, honest, and open subject. The clowns set into play
a transversal relationship which the police are drawn into, even by their own desire to
avoid it, whether by their refusal of eye contact, vocal assertions of authority, or their
uniforms. As both parties look, and to whatever extent feel, uncomfortable and vulnerable, it becomes difficult to ignore the fact that the whole situation, including the
role the police are playing, is absurd. Though this situation frequently entails laughter, its undoing of values and hierarchies does not begin with a joyful irony or with
certainty, but with pathetic, tragic irony and vulnerability. CIRCAs activism works upon
other affective potentials besides a simple assertion of laughter and pure joy.
For this cultural activism, the aesthetic is not just a tactic, tool, or terrain. Like
Radio Alice, CIRCA does not use irony from a safe, knowing point of critique, but
creates an ironic transversal relation in which they themselves are bound up. In this,
their activity accents and theatricalizes the affect of any moment of engagement with
capitalist power relations. John Jordan, one of the early members of Reclaim the
Streets, recently discussed this kind of affective politics as a matter of breaking the
heart of empire. Using the notion of love, he argues that loving, supportive social
relations are not always about joy and laughter: Within a year of J18 happening, the
group that had organized the event fell apart, partly due to internal strife. A little more
love, a bit more space to acknowledge feelings, to speak of despair as well as of our
hopes and joys may have kept us together [. . .] (Jordan).
I have argued that cultural activism orientates politics toward the organization of
desires. This has often been understood in terms of a focus on the most visible,
effervescent, joyful moments which this politics often embodiesthe moment of the
leap. But even if we reject the reactive view of such experiences as tragic failures,
such moments can still often be seen, in retrospect, in terms divorced from their
history: as beautifully utopian, impossible, and even mythological. However, to found
them in relation to a problem of organizing sadness, as a tragic joy, is also to attempt
to found them in relation to the complexities of their historical, material composition.
Works Cited
Autonome A.F.R.I.K.A. Gruppe, Luther Blisset,
and Sonja Brnzels. Handbuch Der
Komunikationsguerilla. Hamburg: Verlag
Libertre , Verlag der Buchlden Schwarze
Risse/Rote Strasse, 1997.
Benjamin, Walter. Paris: Capital of the
Nineteenth Century. Reflections. Trans.
Edmund Jephcott. New York: Shocken, 1986.
. The Work of Art in the Age of
Mechanical Reproduction. Illuminations.
Ed. Hannah Arendt. London: Pimlico, 1999.
Bey, Hakim. T.A.Z. The Temporary Autonomous
Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism.
New York: Autonomedia, 1991.
Brandt, Sebastian. The Ship of Fools. Trans.
William Gillis. London: Folio, 1971.
Brger, Peter. Theory of the Avant Garde. Trans.
Michael Shaw. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota
P, 1984.
Colectivo Situaciones. Politicising Sadness,
Chto Delat?/What Is to Be Done? Trans. Nate
Holdren and Sebastian Touza (2007) August
2007 http://www.chtodelat.org/index.php?
option=com_content&task=view&id=329&
Itemid=167.
Collective A/Traverso. Radio Alice-Free Radio.
Italy: Autonomia: Post-Political Politics. Ed. Sylvere
Lotringer and Christian Marazzi. New York:
Semiotext(e), 1980. 130134.
CrimethInc Workers Collective. Days of War,
Nights of Love: Crimethink for Beginners.
Atlanta: CrimethInc, 2001.
Debord, Guy. Theses on Cultural Revolution,
Internationale Situationniste #1 (June 1958)
Trans. John Shepley (1958). May 2007
http://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/si/theses.
html.
Deleuze, Gilles. Nietzsche and Philosophy. Trans.
Hugh Tomlinson. London: Continuum, 2005.
32 | Gavin Grindon
Notes
1. Also see Lippard (1984).
2. The more obvious term, cultural revolution
is conspicuous in its absence due to its Maoist
associations. However, the term had been used
earlier by the Mao-Dadaists of A/Traverso, and
by both Lefebvre (1984: 195) and Debord.
3. This theoretical precedent to contemporary
activist paradigms is regularly referred to in
34 | Gavin Grindon
The Resonance of
Romanticism: Activist Art &
the Bourgeois Horizon
A. K. Thompson
I
For those who lived through them, the years of struggle against corporate globalization between 1999 and 2003 are memorable for having been marked by an extreme
creative audacity. Along with that movements tactical innovationswhich included
the elaboration of forms of horizontal organizing and the intensification of the capacity for violent confrontations with constituted powercame a profusion of aesthetic
interventions. Combining do-it-yourself ethics with a newfound sense of the pleasures to be had from lowbrow cultural interventions, activists during this period began
in earnest to retrofit the world. After a pabulum generation of post-New Left campaigns that could not help but leave the impression that social change meant fighting for bread and bread, the movements against corporate globalization declared in
no uncertain terms that bread and roses were on the agenda once again.
It is within this context that we can situate that movements profound interest in
the work of Eric Drooker and Banksy. Although working in different idioms, these two
artists are notable for having become prominent visual reference points within movement culture and for having captured and given form to the new spirit of resistance.
The comments that follow are, in part, an account of this resonance. However, while
their interventions were sometimes inspiring (and while they continue to speak to
many of us), its importantwhen considered from the standpoint of an analysis of
the movementto ask precisely what their expressive outbursts expressed. More
specifically, we can ask: What can the content of the movements resonant images
tell us about the movement itself? And even more specifically: Can Drooker and
Banksy serve as an index of the movements historical and political possibilities? If
so, what do they reveal about the field of struggle and the political tasks before us?
II
For readers familiar with his work, this line of questioning will undoubtedly bring to
mind the writings of Walter Benjamin who, in Paris, Capital of the Nineteenth
Century and elsewhere, proposed that resonant images enabled people to anticipate the future by recalling traces of a mythical past whose promise had yet to be
realized. Because of this tendency, Benjamin contended that actors in the present
always end up quoting primeval history (1968a 157). The purpose of these citations was to recall the unrealized elements of history and myth in the hope that their
iteration in the present would allow them to come to fruition. For this reason,
Benjamin contended that each epoch not only dreams the next, but also, in dreaming, strives toward the moment of waking (162).
In the dream in which, before the eyes of each epoch, that which is to follow appears
in images, that latter appears wedded to elements from prehistory, that is, of a classless society. Intimations of this, deposited in the unconscious of the collective, mingle
with the new to produce the utopia that has left its traces in thousands of configurations of life, from permanent buildings to fleeting fashions. (148)
For Benjamin, the present dreams the future by way of a detour through the mythic
past. However, the dream itself does not say anything about the means by which it will
be realized; it neither presents the future in its final material form nor shows the
means by which the wish underlying the mythic citation can be practically fulfilled. For
this, another kind of image is required.2 But, though it provides no blueprints for
revolution, the wish image signals the possibility that the energies constrained by
capital might spill over and bring with them a state of transformative intoxication.
Although Benjamin never advanced a systematic program concerning the use of wish
images, his investigations do allow us to consider why an assemblage as full of exuberance as the one that proclaimed that another world is possible seemed to
reach back into the archive of the romantic past (an archive that was itself composed
of mythic citations) in order to augment its imaginative lan.
36 | A. K. Thompson
III
According to Isaiah Berlin, the literature on romanticism is larger than romanticism
itself (1999: 1). To this provocative but undoubtedly true claim, we might add that
many of the canonical contributions to this literature advance propositions that are
in contradiction with other equally canonical pronouncements. For this reason, it is
(and always has been) difficult to provide a definitive account of the romantic tradition. Nevertheless, I would like to highlight a number of features that help to clarify
the political significance of romanticism in the present. Given the task before us, this
account is based less on the attributes of the romantic object than on the relationship that romanticism posits between object and world, object and audience, and
object and creator.3
First, romanticism arose from the antithetical term of the constitutive contradiction of bourgeois experience. It was a reaction to calculative rationality, the ascendant term of the bourgeois world. Arising from the Enlightenment, calculative
rationality was the means by which the world was transposed into measurable units.
These units enabled the standardization of both processes of production and habits
of thought. However, while calculative rationality became the operational premise of
capitalism and its modern institutions, the contradiction at the heart of bourgeois
experience demanded that the incalculable remainder be addressed. Romanticism
was one form taken by this acknowledgement.
Second, it is significant to note that, while this remainder afforded spiritual seductions seemingly at odds with the operational logic of the bourgeois world, it was not
outside of this world. Indeed, romanticism could not have arisen had it not been for
calculative rationality and the social conditions it brought into being. For its part,
calculative rationality incorporated romanticism as an engine for the production of
new needs. According to Carl Schmitt: the romantic hated the philistine. But it
turned out t hat the philistine loved the romantic, and in such a relationship it was
obvious that the philistine had the dominant position (93).
Third, the nineteenth-century division between calculative rationality and its
antithesis has yet to be resolved. And while the dynamics of this war have been elaborated over time, they could be discerned from the very first act of the bourgeois
drama. Already they were present in the French revolution, where they were given
perfect expression in the guillotine. On one hand, the guillotine stood as emblem of
calculative rationalitys impulse to serialize death and evacuate from it the religious
drama of suffering and redemption. It rendered operational the formal equality heralded by the Enlightenment. Where once the executioner had been Gods proxy, overseer of the punitive liturgy, the guillotine turned him into a functionary (literally, an
executive officer) of the nascent state. On the other hand, the guillotine signaled a
return to forms of religious sacrifice wherein community is constitutedas Rene
Girard has proclaimedby way of collective responsibility for the founding murder
(102). These two premises, antithetical and yet expressed simultaneously within a
single object, mark the constitutive polarity of bourgeois experience. In this way, the
guillotine neatly anticipates the schizophrenia it would help to unleash.
By jumping headlong into the fratricidal war between the antithetical poles of bourgeois consciousness, romanticism pushed itself past judiciousness and moderation.
It toppled the sentinels guarding the knot at the heart of bourgeois experience. Finally,
it stepped forward to become a guiding star for rebels everywhere. But if all of this
happened in the nineteenth century, then why does it continue to happen today?
One way to begin understanding romanticisms recursive character is to note how
identification with the antithetical term of a contradiction is not, in and of itself, a sufficient means of overcoming the contradiction itself. And while the bourgeoisie occasionally endeavored to resolve its constitutive contradiction philosophically (and here
we might think of Kants subjective rationalism), the conditions required for such a
resolution are nowhere to be found within the bourgeois horizon itself. It was precisely to this problem that Georg Lukcs turned in his consideration of the antinomies of bourgeois thought. Proposing that the subjective rationalism inaugurated by
Kant found its limit in the always-partial character of the rational system itself,
Lukcs discovered how, in such systems the ultimate problem of human existence
persists in an irrationality incommensurable with human understanding. Whats
more, the closer the system comes to these ultimate questions the more strikingly
its partial, auxiliary nature and its inability to grasp the essential are revealed
(1971: 11314).
The partitioning of subject and object in the bourgeois imagination cannot be
resolved philosophically, since bourgeois philosophy can go no further than an incomplete subjective-idealism or an incomplete objective-empiricism. Both states are
marked by constitutive lack. However, within this framework, only the subjectiveidealist pole of the romantic worldview holds the promise of resolving that lack through
a valorizing identification with what ought to be. In the contest between rationalism
and its negative other, the rebel operating within the bourgeois horizon has only one
choice. For Lukcs, this negative other is signaled by the irrational and the essential. It is no mistake that these same terms are among the constitutive elements of
the romantic tradition.Despite making positive claims about the intangible, romanticism remains a refusal of the dominantscientific and empiricalterms of bourgeois experience (Berlin 1999: 11920). It is therefore not surprising that, since the
constitutive contradiction of bourgeois experience has yet to be resolved synthetically or surpassed politically (since bourgeois politics continues to be marked by the
irreconcilable tension between heart and mind, art and science, ought and is),
political movements opposed to the bourgeois order have disclosed a predictable
tendency to find consolation inand to align themselves withthe romantic impulse
to undo calculative rationality.
38 | A. K. Thompson
trumpet player stands out on account of a hyper-stylization reminiscent of nineteenthcentury nave art. It is an iconic intervention thatbecause of the visual uncertainty
brought about by its lack of scale, proportion, and symbolic indexicalityseems to
simultaneously push the image into the extreme depths of the single point perspective while (at the same time) flattening the surface so that all objects appear on the
same plane. Perspectival realism is summoned and canceled in a single stroke. It
evokes the feeling of being in a dream.
40 | A. K. Thompson
Drawing on the situational iconography of the Battle of Seattle and Quebec City,
the image is a strange mix of the popular-familiar and the miraculous. Trumpet in
hand, the figure dancing along the top of the fence appears to be totally free. The
laws of gravity do not apply to him. He has even found a means of being behind the
line of riot cops. Given his angelic demeanor, it is tempting to conclude that he levitated over them. But what is most significant about this trumpet player is how he
allows the anti-summit protest to become an epic of biblical proportions. Drawing
on the Old Testament account of Joshuas attack on Jericho, where trumpets make
walls crumble so that the chosen can take possession of the city, Drooker makes the
trumpet player an allegory for radical political struggle. Although the biblical story
finds Joshua leading an army set on territorial conquest, in Drooker the trumpet
player becomes an icon of the underdog. Its a representational strategy that pervades his work. People holding drums and guitars confront cops with guns and
batons. From an objective perspective, Drookers street conflicts demand heavy casualties. Nevertheless, the images remain ennobling and redemptive. Impossible to
escape, the massacre is simultaneously asserted and averted by intangible means.
Why? Because, in these images, victoryas a wishis immanent even though its
actualization is deferred to an indeterminate future or buried in an indeterminate
past. Within this symbolic economy, to resist is already to win. Resistance itself is
the sign of victory. The production recedes; the representation ascends. Delusions
founded on such grounds are self-satisfying; they are also incredibly stimulating. As
a strategy for solidifying identification with what ought to be, the mythical proclamation of victory helps to marshal the energy needed to enact an inversion of the world.
The objective-empirical what you see is what you get is supplanted by the more radical subjective-idealist what you get is what you see. In this way, Drooker made
important contributions to a culture in which activists took seriously the challenge of
overcoming seemingly insurmountable odds.
It is on this basis that we must understand Drookers political resonance. In his
images, one can witness the precise means by which history becomes mythically connected to redemption. To see this process at work, its useful to consider the Drooker
image used by Washington DCs Direct Action Network for demonstrations against
the IMF and World Bank in April 2000. In an obvious citation of Goyas depiction of
the massacre of The Third of May (1814), Drookers image shows a group of activists
on the left side of the composition facing down a line of riot cops on the right. The
cops hold guns like those used in Seattle to launch tear gas canisters, beanbags,
and rubber bullets. The activists hold musical instruments. Behind the cops is a row
of buildings trembling with the reverberations of the activists tremulous noise. And
so, despite Drookers invocation of the slaughter of innocents by the Napoleonic
army, it is clear that (this time) the chosen people will winas they did in Jericho
because of their faith, and because of their belief in the possibility of another world.
42 | A. K. Thompson
By collapsing the historical and the mystical into a single representational register, Drooker provided a concrete means by which activists could enact a transposition
from the ideal to the concrete and back again. Significantly, this ability to effect a
transposition of registers was aided by the reappearance of forms of religious thinking. And though rendered in the secularized idiom of late capitalism (an idiom which
countenances no pretense to hermeneutic depth), Drookers biblical allusions are
unmistakable. They resonated with a movement in which people sought to realize the
promise of all that remained incomplete, a movement that triumphed in the assertion
of the possibility of another world. More than this: the allusions pushed them on,
compelling them to do things they did not yet know they could. Drookers mythic past
a place where the massacre of Spaniards in 1808 is synchronous with Joshuas
assault on Jericho, and where synchronicity is the precondition to redemption
coincided perfectly with the strange form of secularized religious intoxication that
pervaded the movement.
V
In his 1992 masterpiece Flood! (re-released in 2002 for the anti-globalization crowd),
Drooker depicts the descent of a working stiff into a spiral of despair after losing his
job, his apartment, and his grip on reality. The second chapter of the three-chapter
work finds the protagonist in the sub-basements of human cognition. Here, the rules
of logic are swept away by the torrential movement of the rising stream of consciousness. Drooker locates this alter-world, this collective repository of wish images, in the
deepest tunnels of the New York subway system.
Passing through despair, the protagonist comes into direct contact with the contents of the image archive. Fertility goddesses share space with Egyptian hieroglyphs
that give way to cave paintings and tribal dance circles. Emerging from the archive
and returning to the present, the protagonist is confronted in chapter 3 with the
catastrophic dimensions of the everyday. In one dreamlike scene, Drooker portrays a
gust of wind carrying the protagonist into the sky by his umbrella. Hovering above the
world, he is left to contemplate the devastating transformations brought on by industrialism and its aftermath.
Drooker uses this dream state as an analytic device. Imaginative detachment
produces the critical distance necessary to perceive the world directly. In this way,
Drooker makes efforts to arrest the flow of immediate perception and make strange
the taken-for-granted. His city becomes a zone of architectonic exploration in which
the underlying girders of capitalist social relations can be uncovered. The brothel, the
bar, the market, the carnival, the dancehall: like Benjamin, Drooker descends on each
of these sites and transforms them into the raw material for experiments in profane
illumination. However, while this dream state contains analytic potential, there is
no guarantee that visiting it will lead necessarily to a naked reckoning with the world.
44 | A. K. Thompson
find Drooker frequently borrowingnot only in form but also in contentfrom figures
such as Goya, Van Gogh, and Blake.
Drookers populist citations confirm that romanticism is more than a sensibility.
It is also a historical archive to be exploiteda repository of wish images lying in
wait for the moment at which they will be called upon to herald the future. His
work induces a historical doubling over; here, the anxieties that attended to midnineteenth century industrialization reappear on the historical stage (it is the return
of the repressed) precisely at the point of industrialisms anxious unraveling in the
most intensive zones of twenty-first century capitalist accumulation. In order to get a
sense of the ease with which romantic themes continue to resonate in todays endless present, lets consider what various reviewers have had to say about Flood!
Writing for The Rocket, Patrick Barber noted how Drooker has an unsure obsession with New York City that reaches for its deepest mass humanity while being
quashed by consumerism and the sheer bulk and impossibility of urban madness
and impending death. Here, the spiritual pole of bourgeois experienceour deepest mass humanityis directly counterpoised to an impending death brought
about by consumerism. In this way, consumerismthe metonymic sign under which
the market appearsbecomes aligned with calculative rationality in its war against
spirit. In Drooker, Barber perceives a contest between the old and the new played out
on terrain divided according to the split in bourgeois consciousness. Because
Drooker sides with our deepest mass humanity, it follows that Barber describes his
work in terms appropriate to romanticism. For Barber, Flood! is a work of apocalyptic mysticism, manic and complete (1993).
Writing in the Graphic Novel Review, Hubert Vigilla describes how some of this
apocalyptic mysticism gets played out in L, Floods second chapter: L is brimming with archetypes and primal imagery including wide-hipped fertility figures and
ancient hieroglyphs, he recounts. Several life-affirming images splash and rejoice
across the pages of this chapter; a fire-lit cave erupts with rhythmic dancing, a crane
soars into a glimmering night sky, and bodies entwine in a garden teeming with life.
However, though these images offer a vision of emancipation in dream form, they
remain insufficient to the task of transforming the objective world. Consequently, L
closes in downtrodden fashion as the ancient, fundamental joy of life gives way to
cracked, mundane concrete and cold rain (2004).
Writing for the San Mateo Times, Rick Eymer suggests that, while Drookers novel
may seem depressing, it ends with the transfer from oblivion to hope and love. Yes
there are sharp images of decay and tragedy, but there is also a dream that things
46 | A. K. Thompson
can change. We just need to wash away the filth (1992). In this account, we see how
hope and loveby standing in opposition to decay and tragedyare given the task
of redeeming the present. Drooker concludes his story with a historical-mythical doubling over; New York drowns while Noah carries his timeless cargo to presumed
safety. In this way, Drooker presents an imaginative resolution to the contradictions
of the present. New York City (the zone in which the calculative rationality underlying
intensive capital accumulation has succeeded most fully in harnessing the energy of
dreams) is destroyed while the dream it once channeled is allowed to persist unencumbered. However, the fact that this conclusion leaves Eymer wanting to wash
away the filth should alert us to the ambivalence of such wish images when considered from the standpoint of operational politics.5
VI
By popularizing the aesthetic repertoire of romanticism and endowing his protagonists with a more than spiritual dimension, Drooker puts his work in a visual time
fold. Sometimes, this doubling over becomes the explicit content of the images themselves. Jungles grow up to overtake a city populated by both elephants and commuter buses; Noah builds his ark on top of a tenement building. As with Benjamin,
who proclaimed that our life is a muscle strong enough to contract the whole of historical time (2003:479), Drookers protagonists collapse the stages of history into
a single moment of reckoning. However, unlike Benjamin, Drookers reckoning tends
to take the form not of class struggle but rather of personal, mystical, redemption.
This claim may at first seem odd. After all, Benjamins work is often considered
mystical and far from the realities of political struggle. This stands in sharp opposition to Drookers work, which is filled with images of rioting and social unrest.
Nevertheless, it is important to note how, in Benjamin, the reader passes through
myth to arrive in the final instance at concrete reckoning. The class struggle
becomes clear all at once, in a cessation of happening. At this point, the wish image
becomes dialectical. For Benjamin, the dialectical image transforms history from prefabricated narrative (a sequence of discrete events that can be contemplated in succession like the beads of a rosary) into a mode of analysis that is, at the same time,
a mode of production. Like in Marxs description of the labor process, history
becomes susceptible to the intervention of thinking. But how do ideas become a
material force? Here is Benjamins answer as recounted in his Theses on the
Philosophy of History:
Where thinking suddenly stops in a configuration pregnant with tensions, it gives that
configuration a shock, by which it crystallizes into a monad. A historical materialist
approaches a historical subject only where he encounters it as a monad. In this structure he recognizes the sign of a Messianic cessation of happening, or, put differently, a
revolutionary chance in the fight for the oppressed past. He takes cognizance of it in
order to blast a specific era out of the homogeneous course of historyblasting a specific life out of the era or a specific work out of the lifework. (1968b, 262263)
Although he does not use the term, Benjamins proposition that the monad produced
by thinking could by used to blast a significant era out of the homogeneous course
of history both accords with his conception of the dialectical image and shows the
connection between such an image and history as ultimate site of the labor process.
In turn, the dialectical image induces an experience of historic cessation, where the
whole of the accumulated worldthe lifework that ordinarily remains invisible on
account of its trans-local scaleis made present through a metonymic crystallization
that (for an instant) brings about a shocking transparency. The dialectical image
places those that stand before it side by side with all those that previously fought as
they are now fighting. In contrast, Drooker leads his readers in the opposite direction
and has them pass through struggleoften depicted in the form of riots and
confrontations with heavily armed policein order to return to the land of religious
mysticism.
Like Moses falling on the threshold of the Promised Land, Drookers graphic novels Flood! and Blood Song describe redemption as a two-stage process involving a
kind of spiritual projectionan identification with a proxy that remains untouched by
the constraints of this world. The struggle undertaken by Moses to cross the desert
48 | A. K. Thompson
only attains to mythical status as a result of Joshuas later success. It is a myth that
persists in Drookers work. In Flood!, the protagonist is redeemed by way of his cat
who makes it to the Ark and finds his double, the resolution of his lack. In Blood
Song, though he is incarcerated for political activity, the heroines partner lives on
through their child who cries out with the same fiery voice as its father. Joshuas political importance for Drooker is confirmed by his frequent allegorical mobilization of
the assault on Jericho. As we have already seen, it is a theme that gets repeated
throughout his movement imagery. In the following image, simply entitled Jericho,
he makes the reference explicit.
VII
At first glance, the only thing that Banksy seems to have in common with Drooker is
that he too was loved by people who were more likely to throw a brick through a window at Starbucks than order a cup of coffee there. Working in stencil, site-specific
installation, and guerrilla intervention, Banksys work tends to reiterate the content
and formal gestures of the early twentieth-century avant-garde and its radical derivatives. On the surface, these sources of inspiration seem to denote a break from the
resolutely nineteenth-century references pervading Drookers work. However, by submitting Banksys oeuvre to a more thorough investigation, it becomes clear that he
too owes a debt to the romantic tradition. And so, while art history tells the story of
the avant-gardes decisive break from its nineteenth-century counterpoint, the resonant images of the struggles against corporate globalization tell a different tale.
Pointing toward the field of consumption, the social organization of mass society,
and the contradictions arising from late capitalisms attempts to smooth over the
rough edges of urban experience, Banksy owes much to the situationist interventions
of the 1960s and the avant-garde use of montage. Instances of these practices
include his notices informing people visiting famous tourist landmarks that this is
not a photo opportunity (100101), his sign stenciled in Trafalgar Square in advance
of an anti-war demonstration urging people to respect the designated riot area
(57), the figure of the rat reappearing throughout his work to remind people of the
need to look beneath the polished surface of the city, and collages like the one of
Pham Thi Kim Phucthe Vietnamese girl captured on film fleeing with arms outstretched from a napalm attack on her village in 1972holding hands with Mickey
Mouse and Ronald McDonald.
Working in stencil, and using photos circulated over the Internet to extend his
works impact, Banksy images are by definition highly mobile and reproducible. By
using capitalist seriality against itself, his images become novel interventions that
throw into relief the environments into which they get placed. Mobilizing found images
and pop culture citations, Banksy revitalizes the early twentieth-century practice
of montage. Through this process, the social is rematerialized through the forced
Banksy
50 | A. K. Thompson
Banksy
52 | A. K. Thompson
of enabling productive disorientation and shock. However, unlike the shock of the
new (Hughes 1991) fostered by the readymade in its original context, the shock arising from an encounter with Banksy seems to be of a different kind.
Specifically, while the content of his interventions is ostensibly geared toward
social criticism, the encounter with the work often ends up feeling like a romantic
re-enchantment of the world. If, as John Berger has noted, discussions about the
social attributes of art must necessarily rely upon circumstantial evidence (60), then
we should not be shy about finding traces of Banksys romanticism in the snippets of
dialogue published as captions to his images. In one such caption, a Palestinian man
comments on murals painted on the Apartheid Wall near Bethlehem. Recognizing the
ambivalence of his position, Banksy highlights both his tendency toward, and his
understanding of the limits of, enchantment:
Old man: You paint the wall. You make it look beautiful.
Me: Thanks
Old man: We dont want it to be beautiful, we hate this wall, go home. (116)
VIII
Whether or not he intended it, Banksys power to enchant by now seems to be his
greatest gift to others. And artists working in Banksys idiom (artists who have developed a similar repertoire but who have, on occasion, been more willing to elaborate
the ethic underlying their productions) have often been explicit about their commitment to this goal. New York-based artist Swoon is an excellent case in point. Working
primarily in paste up, her pieces share obvious aesthetic bonds with Banksys creations. Anonymous and known only by pseudonym, Swoon brings elements of incongruity into the urban landscape in order to make work thats engaging with peoples
daily lives and more involved in the daily activities of the city (New York Times
2004).
The principle of montage so evident in Banksy makes a striking reappearance in
Swoons introduction of unlikely characters into even more unlikely surroundings. I
love adding that much texture, and maybe even a little bit of chaos, she says (2004).
Read in a sympathetic light, its difficult to ignore the similarities between Swoons
disruptions and those staged by Brecht, where the immediate action of the protagonists with whom the audience had identified is broken by the introduction of an
unlikely figure. At the moment of interruption, the viewer is forced to abandon passive
contemplation. Once rendered alien, the depicted situation is thrown under a harsh
analytic light. According to Benjamin, Brechts interruption arrests the action in its
course, and thereby compels the listener to adopt an attitude vis--vis the process,
the actor vis--vis his role (1978: 235).
But despite the analytic potential of these disruptions, Swoon seems to position
her work much closer to romanticism than she does to Brechts scientific experiments. Sounding optimistic, Swoon told The New York Times that her objective was to
create something that captured street life and that enabled people to feel a
human presence in the city (2004). Initially benign, these sentiments disclose a
disturbing subtext when considered in light of the fact thatbut for the pervasive
dissimulations of the commodity formthe city would be nothing but human presence. Instead of addressing the logic of the commodity directly (as did Duchamp
with his ready-made), Swoons practice seems aimed instead at reintroducing a feeling of wonder as a kind of compensation for the lack engendered by capitalist social
relations.
In Swoons work, the effort to re-enchant the world makes use of perceptual
strategies wholly at odds with the aesthetics of the historic avant-garde to which the
work superficially refers. Rather than using the jarring placement of objects in the
aesthetic field as a means of metonymically illuminating the social world from which
they derive (a process meant to yield both a socio-material history of the object and
a means by which to dislodge the energy trapped in it by capitalisms cannibalization
of need), Swoon seems instead to transpose the entirety of the everyday world into
the domain of aesthetic contemplation. Instead of demanding (and providing the
basis for) focused analysis, her work offers a general education for the aestheticizing gaze. And though this strategy may enable people to deal with the boredom and
alienation of the late capitalist city (the boredom and alienation of endless seriality
and repetition), it fails in the end to provide a means of transforming that reality.
Instead, it offers a course in perceptually enchanting it.
It would be a mistake to draw too great a parallel between Swoon and Banksy.
For one thing, Swoons content has not been as explicitly political as Banksys.
Furthermore, while Swoon is admired by a small group of activists and cultural producers on the New York art scene, she hasunlike Banksyyet to receive the kind
of exposure that can turn an image into a material force. But despite these differences, one thing remains unmistakable: whether or not Banksy himself ascribes to
the aesthetic remodeling of the everyday, it has nevertheless been possible for
artists intervening in the dissimulated spaces of late capitalism using similar means
to pursue this goal explicitly.
IX
In Banksy, the analytic shock of twentieth-century montage is put to the service of
resonant images from the nineteenth century. By suggesting (for instance) that this
is not a photo opportunity (100101), Banksy enjoins the tourist to become the one
who lives experience rather than simply documenting it. (There is, of course, an
inevitable tension here: the aesthetic intervention itself becomes the basis for a
54 | A. K. Thompson
Banksy
These images resonated strongly with those activists that engaged in the struggles against corporate globalization. Nevertheless, neither the depicted cast of characters nor their political limits are new. In fact, they are notable for their remarkable
similarity to the bohemian bestiary paraded before us in Max Raphaels 1933 critique
of Picassos pre-cubist works.
According to Raphael, the history of art from 1789 onward can be read as a
story of the tension between a mythology-oriented group, and another group whose
orientation is non-mythological. Further, by observing their interrelation, the Marxist
sociologist of art could lay bare the immanent dialectics between a borrowed
idealism and an approximate materialism (8990). Situated at the intersection of
these two tendencies lay romanticism, a mode of acknowledging the world-thatought-to-be in the hope of redeeming the world-that-is. According to Raphael,
Picassos pre-cubist sentimental phase (19011906) is marked by this same disposition. Its references were drawn from the fringes of nature and society: blind
men, paralytics, dwarves, morons; poor people, beggars; Harlequins and Pierrots;
prostitutes, tightrope dancers, acrobats, fortune tellers, strolling players; clowns and
jugglers. As weve seen, this cast of characters makes frequent appearances in both
Banksy and Drookers work. However, according to Raphael, despite the critical
potential these figures might suggest, one must not see anything [in Picassos
selection] resembling social criticism, any sort of accusation against the bourgeois
order.
Very much like Rilke, Picasso looks upon poverty as a heroic thing and raises it to
the power of myththe myth of great inner splendour. Far from regarding it as a
social phenomenon which it is up to those afflicted to abolish, he makes of it a
Franciscan virtue heralding the approach of God. This virtue becomes sentimentality in
his hands, because his purely emotional religiosity stands in opposition to the severity
of the created world. (123)
Of course, Banksy is not Picasso. Although their cast of characters may be drawn
from the same regions of human experience, Banksys use of montage (nowhere in
evidence in Picassos sentimental work) allows him to place his drug fiend directly
into the streets of the late capitalist metropolis. Consequently, his interjection cannot
be reduced to mere sentimentality. Potentially, it could work to make visible the
things that have been pushed from view. This stands in sharp contrast to Picassos
canvas, where the reality of the realespecially when confronted from the standpoint of the presentseems to have been effectively aestheticized.6 However, even
in the context of montage, the archival figures cited by Banksy cannot escape the narrative weight with which theyve become historically saddled. The representation
moves away from the thing; finally, it becomes the thing itself.
Moreover, by promising to point the viewer toward the concealed sublime within
the late capitalist city (that real thing that somehow withstood the transmutations of
56 | A. K. Thompson
a world that changes everything into the image of itself), Banksys romanticism
becomes stabilizing ballast. Pushed to its logical conclusion, this means that Banksy
effectivelyif inadvertentlycontributes to the capitalist project of re-infusing its
dead spaces, destroyed by expert administration and calculative rationality, with a
kind of life-affirming depth. In Wall and Piece, Banksy confronts this problem directly
(although he does not resolve it) by presenting comments sent to him via his website: I dont know who you are or how many of you there are but I am writing to ask
you to stop painting your things where we live . . .
My brother and me were born here and have lived here all our lives but these days
so many yuppies and students are moving here that neither of us can afford to buy a
house where we grew up anymore. Your grafitties are undoubtedly part of what makes
these wankers think our area is cool. (20)
As is typical of romanticism, the outpouring of sentiment made possible by Banksy
images provokes feelings of resistance by conceptually negating calculative rationality, the positive pole of the contradiction at the heart of bourgeois experience and the
operative premise of capitalist production. What these feelings fail to disclose is the
extent to which identification with the antithetical term does not place the viewer outside of the logic of capital. Far from it: the bourgeois ability to identify with its own
dark side, with its unanswerable questions and irrational propositions, has been a
great strength since the nineteenth century.
When considered from within the epistemological constraints of the bourgeois
horizon, resistance (a production) becomes the image of resistance. And though it
may yield cathartic respite, the image of resistance cannot escape the expansionist
logic of the commodity form, the logic that transposes everything into the register of
a universal abstraction so that it might be exchanged with every other thing (and so
that, in this way, the promise of those equivalents may be consumed along with the
thing itself). The distance between being enchanted by Banksy and changing the
world could not be greater. It is the distance between the rebel and the revolutionary,
between negation and the negation of the negation, between romanticism and a
world where the bourgeoisie have become impossible.
X
Activists engaged in the struggle against corporate globalization rarely articulated
their longing to fill the lack endemic to late capitalism in the language of romanticism. Nevertheless, the movements slogans disclose the extent to which romantic
themes shaped its sensibilities. To get a sense of the importance that activists
placed on romanticisms indeterminate outside, one could do no better than to refer
to the popular demonstration placard that enjoined people to abolish capitalism
and replace it with something nicer. By not asserting a positive content, the nonspecificity of the injunction encouraged people to draw upon their catalogue of
secret desires in order to think in ways that were not bound by the logic of calculation.
By filling their vision of that which was nicer with a positive content derived from
their secret archive of wish images, activists seem to have uncovered a means by
which to liberate the energy trapped in the commodity form so that it could be channeled into struggle. A similar process can be seen at work in the frequently repeated
idea that the movement was a composite of one no and many yeses.
Recognition of the suppressed energies lying in wait outside the proscribed
bounds of calculative rationality alerted activists to the productive myth of another
world. As the activist love affair with Drooker and Banksy makes clear, the positive
content of this imagined world was drawn from the wish images of romanticism. The
experience was exhilarating. However, while many participants imagined their identification with this imaginative realm to mark a decisive break from all that had come
before, history tells a different story. Indeed, it is impossible to ignore the remarkable
connection between the anti-globalization struggles that marked the beginning of the
21st century and the uprising of May 68.
In 1968, when the students of the Quartier Latin went Lenin one better and
demanded all power to the imagination, they were reiterating the premise of dual
power with an important difference. For Lenin, since the soviets were outside the
Duma, they afforded the possibility of constituting a power in opposition to the nascent bourgeoisie. By proclaiming that all power should reside in the soviet, Lenin
sought to heighten the political antagonism so that politics itself could be emancipated from the bourgeois delusion of negotiated truth and openly become class war.
Realized as for-itself entities, two opponents could thus come into battle. And with
the victory of one over the other, the univocality of truth would be established.
However, for the enrags of 1968, politics was envisioned as more than a contest
between enemy antagonists; it was also a contest between two principles operating
within a single individual.
In opposition to the calculative rationality and heightened technicity of late capitalism, the rioters demanded thatprecisely because it was calculative rationalitys
incalculable remainderimagination itself needed to be advanced to the position of
productive principle. In this way, Lenins gesture, a gesture that arose from the need
to come to terms with an extrinsic enemy, was superficially appropriated and applied
to an internal division. Although the slogan was spoken in the nameand under the
signof a radical past, the political contest between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie was nevertheless displaced by a contest between two principles intrinsic to
the bourgeoisie itself. By heralding a future in which the fragmented world would
once again be made whole, the movements emphasis on imagination led directly
toward a culture of anticipationthe characteristic posture of those who wait for
God. This posture found its contemporary expression in the anti-globalization movements proclamation that another world is possible.
58 | A. K. Thompson
acknowledge that its doubtful that these energies will everin and of themselves
be sufficient.
The resolution of the contradictions of the bourgeois world will be found not in
negation but in synthesis. The epistemological divide between calculative rationality and spiritbetween the bourgeoisies borrowed idealism and approximate
materialismfinds its resolution in historical materialism alone. Bourgeois epistemological fratricide is overcome by what Marx, in his first thesis on Feuerbach, called
practical-critical activity (1998: 572). It is a form of activity in which the image of
resistance must cease being a form of wish fulfillment so that it might become the
first step in a labor process aimed at transforming the world. Like conscious curators
in the archive of dreams, Drooker and Banksy point us in this direction. But they also
reveal how far we still have to go.
60 | A. K. Thompson
Works Cited
Abrams, M. H. The Mirror and the Lamp:
Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition.
London: Oxford UP, 1953.
Agamben, Giorgio. The Man Without Content.
Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 1999.
Banksy. Wall and Piece. London: Century,
2005.
Barber, Patrick. Review of Flood! A Novel in
Pictures The Rocket. 1993. Republished on
http://www.drooker.com/reviews/the_rocket.
html. Retrieved Jan 2, 2005.
Notes
1. CrimethInc never reflected the movement as
a whole. Nevertheless, they played an important
role in shaping the political outlook of sizable
sections of the North American anti-capitalist
left during the 19992003 cycle of struggle. It
is therefore of consequence that, in Days of War,
Nights of Love, they specifically rejected history
as an analytic tool and field of struggle:
Conventional wisdom has it that a knowledge
of the past is indispensable in the pursuit of
freedom and social change. But todays radical
thinkers and activists are no closer to changing
the world for their knowledge of past
philosophies and struggles; on the contrary,
they often seem mired in ancient methods and
arguments, unable to apprehend what is needed
in the present to make things happen. Their
place in the tradition of struggle has trapped
them in a losing battle, defending positions
long useless and outmoded; their constant
reference to the past not only render them
incomprehensible to others, but also prevent
them from referencing what is going on around
them (2001:111). As will become clear,
CrimethIncs insistence on novelty and their
disavowal of the chain of events must itself
be historicized. For all their desire for
unencumbered action, CrimethInc operatives
nevertheless rehearse arguments indigenous
to the nineteenth century.
2. Walter Benjamin described these images
as dialectical images. In the notes for the
uncompleted Arcades Project, he described
62 | A. K. Thompson
66 | Marco Deseriis
Bologna, Rome, and Lubljana. The life and death of Darko Maver were pure invention,
a myth designed to expose the mechanisms by which the art system thrives and replicates itself:
The dreadful images of fetuses and aborts, alleged evidence of Darkos activities at
the Belgrade Academy, were true, yet, without effort, we made people believe they were
huge PVC and fiberglass sculptures, even wearable!
The famous Tanz der Spinne is made of images of real deaths, rapes and violence
of many kinds; no dummy ever existed and no Serbian newspaper ever reviewed
Mavers performances. All this inventory of horrifying images can be found on the
Internet site http://www.rotten.com and other sites like that, accessible to anybody
who has a strong stomach. Mavers very face was actually that of Roberto Capelli, a
long-time member of the Luther Blissett Project in Bologna.6
The press release went further to describe the swindle as an active riot against
the capitalist art system, responsible for commodifying any creative act and even
life itself. This was a risk that Darko Maver did not run because Darko Maver doesnt exist! as he is himself an essay of pure mythopoesis, a virus designed to infiltrate the art world and release his potential from within.7
The Great Art Swindlea pun on the Sex Pistols Great Rockn Roll Swindle
meticulously (and cynically) exploited two different factors: the first, strictly political,
68 | Marco Deseriis
was the European sense of impotence and guilt toward the ferocious civil war which
followed the demise of the Yugoslav Federationan untimely conflict that had triggered tragic memories and reopened old scars in the heart of Europe.8 The second
aspect, more specific to the art system, was the late 1990s body-art hype that had
brought into the spotlight performance artists such as Stelarc, Orlan, and Ron Athey.
By referencing the body art imagery, with its repertoire of modified, pierced, and scarified bodies in simulated performances set against the backdrop of an actual conflict, Maver had produced an edgy body of work that the European art world could
hardly ignore.
The Great Art Swindle was the last major prank of the Luther Blissett Project and
one of the first of 0100101110101101.ORG, an offshoot of Luther Blissett and a
new media art duo that had largely built its elusive identity upon the staging of fake
events.
Origin and Early Phases of the Project
But who is Luther Blissett? And who are the real actors behind the Free Art
Campaign? Why did they decide to plot such a scheme? Did they really want to undermine the art system or did they have a broader agenda?
To answer these questions we must rewind our story to the summer of 1994,
when a number of individuals began using the name of Luther Blissett to author a
variety of public interventions. The idea was simple: anyone could become Luther
Blissett by simply adopting the name. As a result, in the following years the nom de
plume was adopted by hundreds of individuals in Italy, the United Kingdom, Germany,
and other countries to dupe the press into reporting non-events, hijack popular TV
programs, sell dubious and radical books to publishers, conduct psychogeographic
urban experiments, fabricate artists and artworks, and much more.9
Until 1994, the only character known to the Italian public as Luther Blissett was a
British footballer of Jamaican origins who had played an unfortunate season in the
Italian Serie A in the mid-1980s. Thus, since Blissett was synonym of fiasco, not
certainly of counterculture and culture jamming, the reason why the name was
adopted in the first place was and still remains shrouded in mystery. Some journalists have speculated that Blissett was chosen because the AC Milan scouts, who
signed him for one million pounds from Elton Johns Watford in 1983, had mistaken
him with the more talented John Barnes.10 Others have argued that Blissett
became a radical icon because he was one of the first black footballers to play in
Italy.11 Similar uncertainty surrounds the only circulating image of Blissett: a portrait
of a yuppie-looking man, allegedly composed from the digital morphing of three or
four faces.
The mystery regarding the origin of the multiple-use name was not casual. Rather,
as we shall see, it was intentionally cultivated as part of an elaborate mythmaking
70 | Marco Deseriis
(Trax 01, Trax 02, . . .) and acted either as Central Units in charge of organizing a
module such as a music event or the release of a Trax collection, or as Peripheral
Units contributing to one of the modules (Blissett 2000: 1112). At the same time,
Baroni and Ciani invented Mind Invaders, a fictional punk band whose concerts,
releases, reviews, interviews, and subsequent disavowals were entirely fabricated by
an extended network of music journalists. From 1980 through 1984, Baroni also
co-founded Lieutenant Murnau, a sound-collage band whose name could be used by
anybody to produce its recycled music (Ciani).
But the first pages of Mind Invaders (the book) managed to cloud the origins
of the Project by assigning a founding role also to Coleman Healy, Monty Cantsin,
and Karen Eliota dense web of multiple-use names that had been coined in the
late 1970s by various mail artists, and used in the 1980s by Neoism, a pseudoavant-garde that mocked the very idea of novelty and cultural fashions (Blissett
19952000).
Cantsin in particular was an open pop star whose modus operandi presented
striking similarities with Blissetts. Created in 1978 by US mail artist Al Ackerman,
the name Montsy Cantsin was used as a handle by a number of Canadian, US, and
European performance artists throughout the 1980s. With Cantsin, Blissett (1995)
shared a predilection for pranks, pseudonyms, fabrications, and a radical undermining of the notions of individual identity and authorship:
It is necessary to get rid of the concept of In-dividuum, once and for all. That concept
is deeply reactionary, anthropocentric and forever associated with such concepts as
originality and copyright. Instead, we ought to embrace the idea of a Con-dividuum, i.e.,
a multiple singularity whose unfolding entails new definitions of responsibility and
will, and is no good for lawyers and judges.12
The Neoist apartment festivals, and the emphasis on the great confusion and radical play had a poetic and surreal dimension that the LBP inherited, as we shall see,
in the psychogeographic experiments of Radio Blissett and the urban performances
of the Teatro Situazionautico Luther Blissett.13 However, endless diatribes, secessions, and personal aspirations had rapidly splintered the Neoist network, confining
it to fringe positions.14
The LBP instead was able to maintain a paradoxical unity of action and coordination throughout the arc of the project. In the period 19941999, the multiple-use
name was adopted by three art/activist collectives in Rome, Bologna, and Viterbo,
and by a number of individuals throughout Europe. Thus, even if some prominent and
quarrelsome characters of the Neoist network, such as British novelist Stewart
Home, had joined the Project, the Italian collectives that provided the backbone of
the LBP did not engage in the personal diatribes of their predecessors.15 This higher
level of collaboration allowed them to focus most of their energy on media targeting
and manipulation.
The first significant prank orchestrated by the LBP dates back to January 1995,
when a troupe of Chi lha visto?an Italian prime-time TV show dedicated to missing
personswas sent on the traces of Harry Kipper, a British conceptual artist allegedly
touring Europe on a mountain bike with the purpose of linking several cities through
an imaginary line that would eventually trace the word Art on Europes map.
The TV crew was first placed in touch with radio journalist and mail artist Pier
Mario Ciani, who claimed that the British artist had been last sighted in Bertiolo, a
village in North-Eastern Italy. The journalists were then sent to London, where Stewart
Home and Richard Essex of the London Psychogeographical Association showed
them around Kippers apartment. After announcing full coverage of Kippers case in
the upcoming show, the staff, smelling a rat, decided not to air the report. At this
point, Blissett sent our a press release claiming that Kippers imaginary performance
was to be read as an allegory of the death of the artist:
On the first level of simulation, Kipper had to free the Luther Blissett Project from
any founder and origin, to let it jettison ballast and take off. On the second level of simulation, the prank was an assault on Chi lha visto? and an opportunity to test the networking abilities of people using the multiple name.16
In the ensuing years, the network grew in size and scope, coupling media pranks with
other activities inspired by the notion of the drive or the driftan apparently aimless
wandering through the modern city whereby individuals experience urban space in
accordance with their own desires and sense of playfulness, rather than following the
demarcations dictated by functionalist architecture and city plans.
Designed in the 1950s by the Lettrists and elaborated in the 1960s by the
Situationists, the pseudo-sciences of psychogeography and Unitary Urbanism had
been renewed in the 1980s by the London Psychogeographic Association (LPA) with
the insertion of occultist elements such as the discovery of urban ley lines. (In archeology the ley lines describe the alignment of ancient sites stretching across the landscape). After collecting data through various drifts, the psychogeographers of the LPA
traced the significant spots on a city map and aligned them to form previously undiscovered ley lines. The LBP updated this version of the drive by adding another layer:
the real-time sharing of information, among various psychogeographers, through the
combined use of broadcast radio and the telephone system.
In fall 1994, a Bolognese community radio began broadcasting Radio Blissett, a
late-night show featuring a variable number of Luthers who patrolled the city on
foot and called the studio from local phone booths. Listeners could also call in at any
time and direct the patrols to various locations to join or create unexpected social
events, including guerrilla-theater interventions, street parties, three-sided football
matches, and psychic attacks against public buildings and institutions.
The experiment was duplicated shortly thereafter in Rome, where the extension of
the city required the simultaneous use of car patrols and cell phones. The Saturday
72 | Marco Deseriis
night show, which aired on the frequencies of Radio Citt Futura, featured psychic
attacks against the Italian copyright office (SIAE), the office of employment (Ufficio di
Collocamento), and other semi-improvised direct actions which culminated in one of
the most well-known stunts of the Blissetts saga.
On the evening of June 15, 1995, several Blissetts boarded the 30 night tram at
different stops carrying confetti, drinks, and ghetto blasters blaring Radio Blissett. As
the party grew wilder, a couple of police cars blocked the tram. Requested to disembark, the psychogeographers declined to identify themselves except by the multiple
name: A cop fired shots into the air. The riot and shoot-out were broadcast live via a
mobile phone. Four Luthers were charged with disorderly conduct and participation
in a seditious rally (Home XI).
The media attention that followed had the effect of placing Blissett on the map.
Moreover, if up to that point, within radical leftist circles the multiple personality was
considered little more than an intellectual gizmo for wannabe radicals, after the confrontation with the police Blissett began to be perceived as an organic component of
the movement (il movimento).
The Radical Milieu of the LBP
The movement is a network of squatted community centers, also known as Centri
Sociali Occupati e Autogestiti (CSOA), which had begun spreading throughout Italy in
the late 1980s. After the 1990 outbreak of La Pantera (The Panther)a mass student movement that had led a three-month long occupation of virtually every Italian
university to protest the privatization of higher educationstudents, unemployed,
precarious, and underpaid workers occupied abandoned public buildings such as
schools, warehouses, and military installations in suburban and non-residential
metropolitan areas. With their unique mix of political cultures and subcultures, centri
sociali such as Forte Prenestino, Villaggio Globale, and Corto Circuito in Rome, Livello
57 in Bologna, Officina 99 in Naples, Leonkavallo and Cox 18 in Milan organized
demonstrations, festivals, debates, concerts, rave parties, and a wide range of daily
and weekly activities. As Naomi Klein notes The [Italian] social centre network is a
parallel political sphere that, rather than trying to gain state power, provides alternative state servicessuch as daycare and advocacy for refugeesat the same time
as it confronts the state through direct action.17
Even though Mail Art and Neoism had played an important role in the early stages
of the Project, the LBP cannot be properly understood without considering the cultural, social, and activist milieu to which most of its young participants belonged. In
this respect, I contend that the Luther Blissett Project stemmed from the interaction
of two irreducible historical factors: 1) the peculiarity of the Italian socio-political
situation in the early 1990s; and 2) the emergence of the Internet as a medium of
mass communication.
With regard to the first factor, the end of the Cold War had ignited a period of
prolonged political instability in Italy, marked by the inability of the national ruling
groups to complete the political transition from the First to the so-called Second
Republic. In fact, beginning in 1992, a national investigation known as Mani Pulite
(Clean Hands) into political corruption led to the disclosure of Tangentopoli (Bribeville),
an extended system of bribes whereby entrepreneurs won public contracts and political favors. The scandal ignited the sudden disintegration of the Pentapartito, the
five-party coalition that had kept the country within the NATO alliance since the aftermath of World War II, and opened up a political gap that was rapidly filled by the emergence of new conservative forces such as media mogul Silvio Berlusconis party
Forza Italia, the post-fascist party Alleanza Nazionale, and the independentist party
Lega Nord.
In other words, the fall of the Berlin Wall uncovered the unsustainability of a clientelist system that, thriving under the Cold Wars frozen alliances, had provided political leaders and party machines with abundant black funds while allowing complacent
entrepreneurs to dispense with market competition. In a context in which a spiraling
public debt required a discredited political class to make draconian cuts to the welfare state, the centri sociali became a catalyst for a generation of young people who
were given little opportunity to practice their skills within a stagnant job market.
The LBP was borne out of this milieu, even though its media-savvy members tried
to reach beyond the often self-referential universe of the CSOA. In fact, many members
of the LBP were undergraduate and graduate students in the departments of communication sciences, sociology, arts, literature, and philosophy of the universities of
Rome, Viterbo, and Bologna, some were trained as journalists or writers, and many
of them became professionals in the media sector or the culture industry after the
demise of the Project.
The media-savvyness of the LBP leads us to the second aforementioned historical
factor. In Italy, as in many other countries, the early-1990s are also marked by the
mass diffusion of the Internet and the first mobile phones, and by the descending
costs of prosumer electronic devices such as digital cameras and editing workstations that tend to close the gap between professional and amateur productions.
These social centers take advantage of this revolution to set up and reinforce an
independent communication infrastructure consisting of the autoproduzione (selfproduction) and autodistribuzione (self-distribution) of musicin particular political
hip-hop, punk/hardcore, and reggae bandscritical texts, and activist videos. In
1993, the creation of Cybernet, a national electronic network consisting of about
thirty Bulletin Board Systems (BBS), sped up collaboration (and conflict) among
different geographic and political areas of the movement.
Many members of the Roman LBP are directly involved with the AvaNa collective,
the media lab of the social center Forte Prenestino that runs the homonymous BBS.
74 | Marco Deseriis
It is on the AvaNa/Cybernet mailing lists and in the physical meetings of the collective that a rich debate unfolds on the possible constitution of autonomous political
enterprises [imprese politiche autonome]. The idea is to expand the market reach
of the social centers autoproduzioni to create self-sustaining bodies, such as cooperatives and collectively-run businesses that could simultaneously function as economic entities and activist projects.
Some activists call this process going overground or leaving behind the Indian
Reserves of the underground to have a larger cultural and political impact on Italian
society (Dazieri). Some others argue that coming to terms with the market could have
a chilling effect on social struggles, and see this discussion as largely misleading.18
The members of the LBP clearly lean toward the former position, convinced as they
are that any form of social activity is already an economic activity, and should be
remunerated as such.
Luther Blissett, Immaterial Worker of the World
The social centers discussion on the autonomous political enterprise did not materialize out of the blue. Rather, it should be framed within an ongoing theoretical
debate among Italian Marxist and post-Marxist intellectuals on the transition from
Fordism to post-Fordism and the emergence of immaterial labor. This conversation
can be roughly divided into three strands: (post)workerist, linguistic, and feminist.
Originally known as Autonomist or Workerist (operaista) Marxism, the first perspective dates back to the 1960s, when the Italian translation of Marxs Grundrisse
(185761) ignited a lengthy conversation on the relationship between the Marxian
notions of dead labor (the labor objectified in machinery and technology) and living
labor, that form-giving fire of human activity that Marx identified with the entire
potential of the workers living body.
If, in the early 1960s, Renato Panzieri and the intellectuals revolving around
the journal Quaderni Rossi [Red Notes] had given a frankfurter reading of the
Grundrissethat is, fixed capital and machinery were seen as a vehicle of oppression against living laborby the end of the decade Mario Tronti (1966) suggested an
almost opposite interpretation whereby the development of living labor anticipated
and prefigured that of fixed capital. This theoretical U-turn was grounded in an analysis of the new cycle of social struggles that had moved a significant part of the Italian
working class on openly anti-capitalist positions in the late 1960s.
By noting how the decentralization and reorganization of industrial production
occurred right at the beginning of the 1970s, that is, after the 1968 student movement and the 1969 autunno caldo [hot fall], the Italian workerists interpreted
the transition from Fordism to post-Fordism as capitalist reaction to the workers
struggles.19 For Antonio Negri, the workers mass refusal of waged labor and exodus
from the working place had the effect of pushing laboring processes outside the
factory walls while setting in motion new forms of political organization and multiplying the sites of contestation throughout society. Living labor is thus the creative force
that, on one hand, transforms work in the struggle against capital and, on the other,
generates a multiplicity of self-valorizing, autonomous projects that point beyond
capitalist relations.
This point introduces us to the second analysis of immaterial labor, which is
more strictly linguistic, and whose main representative is Paolo Virno. A former
member, like Negri, of Potere Operaio, Virno also approaches Marx from the
Grundrisse. In the notorious Fragment on Machines, Marx notes how, in order to
reproduce itself, capital has increasingly relied on socialized forms of labor, that is,
on the general state of science and on the progress of technology, or the application
of this science to production. (705) As the general social knowledge or general
intellect is channeled toward the development of more productive machines and the
development of fixed capital a large part of the wealth already created can be withdrawn both from immediate consumption and from production for immediate
consumption. (709) Thus, as increased productivity allows the capitalist to employ
people upon something not directly or immediately productive, labor moves to the
side of the productive process, turning more and more into a supervisory and regulatory activity. (Ibid)
As Virno notes, this type of regulatory activity mobilizes the workers communicative and linguistic faculties. In fact, contemporary immaterial workers are evaluated
and rewarded not only for the fulfillment of specifics tasks, but also for their ability to
cooperate, modify and ameliorate the organization of labor itself, i.e., for their ability
to increase productivity. This leads Virno to argue that, besides being the core of the
media industry in the post-Ford era, human communication is also an essential
ingredient of productive cooperation in general; thus it is the reigning productive
force, something that goes beyond the domain of its own sphere, pertaining instead
to the industry as a whole, to poiesis in its totality. (60)
But if communication and language are critical to innovation and productivity, they
do not take place in a vacuum, attached as they are to the workers living body and
the complex of its physical and emotional needs. Since the early 1970s, scholars
such as Mariarosa Dalla Costa (1972), Silvia Federici (1980; 1998), and Leopoldina
Fortunati (1995) have analyzed the relationship between reproductive and productive
labor, and between unwaged and waged labor in relation to domestic labor, nurturing
and prostitution. As Leopoldina Fortunati points out, while Marx clearly saw the
domestic sphere as an unproductive sphere, we saw the production of goods and
services (prostitution included) as a crucial stage inside the whole process of production and reproduction. (145)
Thus, if the workerists drew on the Grundrisse to underscore the less deterministic aspects of Marxian thought, the feminists pointed to other aspects of Marxian
76 | Marco Deseriis
firms to which I could not be more indifferent; for all the advertising I continuously
make by wearing branded t-shirts, backpacks, socks, jackets, bathing suits, towels,
without my body being remunerated as a commercial billboard; for all of this and much
more, the industry of the integrated spectacle owes me money!
I understand it may be difficult to calculate how much they owe me as an individual.
But this is not necessary at all, because I am Luther Blissett, the multiple and the multiplex. And what the industry of the integrated spectacle owes me, it is owed to the
many that I am, and is owed to me because I am many. From this viewpoint, we can
agree on a generalized compensation. You will not have peace until I will not have
the money! LOTS OF MONEY BECAUSE I AM MANY: CITIZEN INCOME FOR LUTHER
BLISSETT!20
Thus, as labor increasingly becomes immaterial, and the creation of wealth is more
and more entangled with the process of constituting forms of subjectivity, Luther
Blissett reclaims the immeasurable and excessive character of the con-dividuum
with respect to the value that the industry of the integrated spectacle extracts from
it. If in the age of biopolitical production the locus of surplus value lies, as Hard
and Negri argue, in the knowledge, language, and affects that society produces in
common, then Luther Blissett was a figure of the common and of the self-valorizing
capacity of the immaterial workers to cooperate and produce in common.
Mythmaking, Parasiting, Storytelling
As we have seen, since the beginning, the LBP had managed to disguise the identity
of actual Luther Blissett progenitors by tracing the origin of the multiple-use name to
a Jamaican soccer player, a US mail artist, and a dense web of fictional characters.
The manifold accounts of the Projects origins served to create an imaginary field
whereby Blissetts name and gestures could be connected to other legendary figures.
Such a strategy was pursued by various Bolognese members of the LBP and, after
the demise of the Project, by one of its main offshoots, the collective of historic novelists Wu Minga Chinese expression that translates as no name or unknown.
In various articles and interviews, Wu Ming has compared Luther Blissett to other folk
heroes such as Poor Konrad, Captain Swing, General Ludd, and the Subcomandante
Marcos.21 Even though those mythic characters were respectively created by struggling communities as diverse as the sixteenth-century Swabian peasants, the
eighteenth-century impoverished English farmers, the nineteenth-century industrial
workers, and the indigenous people of Chiapas, they all fulfill a similar function: they
narrate and perform their communities into existence.
To be sure, being a brainchild of immaterial workers, Luther Blissett used a
variety of media platforms and communication strategies virtually unknown to his
predecessors. However, the comparison between Blissett and other folk heroes primarily served the purpose of stating that, far from simply being a media prankster,
78 | Marco Deseriis
Luther Blissett was a positive mythic figure, a Robin Hood of the Information Age
who was supposed to embody the very process of community and cross-media storytelling. Such an objective is manifest in the following definition of mythopoesis
offered by Roberto Bui, one of the founding members of the LBP and Wu Ming:
Mythopoesis is the social process of constructing myths, by which we do not
mean false stories, we mean stories that are told and shared, re-told and manipulated, by a vast and multifarious community, stories that may give shape to some
kind of ritual, some sense of continuity between what we do and what other people
did in the past. A tradition. In Latin the verb tradere simply meant to hand down
something, it did not entail any narrow-mindedness, conservatism or forced respect
for the past. Revolutions and radical movements have always found and told their
own myths.22
This political reading of mythmaking has the advantage of moving the stress from
the strictly textual and narrative level to the social process whereby myths are created. If Marx and the Marxist tradition has predominantly read myth as an instrument
of class domination, Wu Ming suggests that myths can have, in fact, a progressive
and counter-hegemonic function as long as their movement and transformation is
not arrested. From this angle, myth appears to be fundamentally different from
other forms of narrative in that, besides telling a story, it performs a certain task
or, in Malinowskis words, is experienced as lived reality by a particular human
group (81).
In this respect, it is useful to compare this progressive and positive interpretation of mythmaking to the negative reading of myth offered by Roland Barthes. In
Mythologies, Barthes defines myth as a type of speech, a mode of signification, an empty form, and a second-order semiological system that has the
power to deprive each and every sign of its peculiarity with the three-fold purpose
of naturalizing culture, eternalizing history, and obfuscating the actual relations of
production.
Asked whether he believes myths are possible on the Left, Barthes responds negatively, arguing that myth always entails an ability to lie, and therefore to dispose of
a certain wealth to sparea wealth the barren, poverty-stricken, and transitive
type of speech of the working classes cannot afford (14748). Since the oppressed
can only borrow the mask of myth and the luxury of an empty form from the bourgeoisie, Barthes suggests that the best way to resist myth is perhaps to mythify
it in its turn, and to produce an artificial myth [. . .]. Since myth robs language of
something, why not rob myth? All that is needed is to use it as a departure point for
a third-order semiological chain, to take its signification as the first term of a second
myth (135).
Drawing on Barthes suggestion, I contend that the Luther Blissett Project is a
third-order type of narrative, an artificial myth which makes a parasitical use of the
myth of the pop star or, to be more specific, of what Lazarsfeld and Merton have
termed the status conferral function of the media, that is, their ability to legitimize
the authority of selected groups and individuals. In other words, Blissett exploited
the reputation accumulated by various media outlets (through their circulation and
longevity) to enhance his own status and cultural capital.
In this respect, unlike Barthes barren Leftist myths of the 1950s, Blissetts language was elaborate, nuanced and could afford to lie because it fed on the overabundance of the information age and on the information surplus generated by the
seemingly unstoppable expansion of the media system. In a way, we could say that
Blissett behaves like an epiparasitea parasite feeding on another parasite. Like his
host, the multiple singularity is a medium which enables communication among
a variety of subjects. But unlike his host, the con-dividuum does not pretend to be
a transparent or neutral channel. On the contrary, Blissett functions as a social
medium in which a variety of enunciating subjects (the -dividuals borrowing Blissetts
name) and the channel (the con-dividuum Luther Blissett taken in its complex) are
deeply intertwined and constantly affect each other.
And yet, Luther Blissett as a concrete -dividual who authors a specific intervention
(what we may call the syntagmatic dimension of the Project) and Luther Blissett as
80 | Marco Deseriis
the mythic personification of all those interventions (what we may call the paradigmatic dimension of the Project) fulfill two different functions. When a Luther Blissett
pulls a prank, he, she or they denounce the media as an extension of big power and
as profit-making machines that prey on the commonality of biopolitical production,
i.e., of production as an ensemble of linguistic, cognitive, and affective relations. But
when considered as a mythic character, Blissett comes to embody the creative
potency of that commonality or what Hardt and Negri refer to as the becoming common of labor (2004: 10315).
To be sure, this ability to demystify the media and reuse copyrighted materials to
create narratives open to a plurality of social uses is neither unique nor original to
the LBP. For example, the very practice of culture jamminga term coined in 1984
by the US sound-collage band Negativlandentails capturing the corporately controlled subjects of the one-way media barrage, reorganizing them to be a comment on
themselves, and spitting them back into the barrage for cultural consideration.23
Similarly, a wide range of guerrilla-communication techniques such as dtournement,
fake, camouflage, montage/collage, subvertising, sniping, and cross-dressing undermine and try to reverse the power discourse by appropriating its mode of presentation and aesthetic codes.
The Handbuch der Kommunikationsguerrilla, a German book co-authored by Luther
Blissett, Sonja Brunzels (another multiple-use name), and the Berlinese collective
autonome a.f.r.i.k.a gruppe has sorted these techniques according to two basic operating principles: the principle of estrangement, a version of the Brechtian alienation
effect (verfremdungseffekt); and Slavoj Zizeks concept of overidentification.
The former undermines the often invisible system of rules that structure social
relationships and interactions by inserting apparently incongruent elements within an
ordinary context: the defacement of commercial billboards or websites, an unexpected street performance, the dtournement of a political slogan or logo can disrupt
daily routines, established linguistic codes, and thus reveal the power structures that
lurk behind them. The principle of overidentification, on the other hand, achieves a
similar effect by following a different if not opposite trajectory. According to Slavoj
Zizek (1993), overidentification works by bringing to light an implicit and unspoken
set of assumptions that are shared by the powers that be and the members of a community. For the Slovenian philosopher, power always requires a minimal distance from
its explicit rules in order to function: what cannot be said explicitly is pointed to
implicitly in order to become acceptable in the public sphere. This obscene underside of ideology is, for Zizek, the invisible premise or the inherent transgression
upon which every power discourse rests.
If people are able to maintain a cynical attitude toward the more enticing aspects
of ideology as a call to arms, it is precisely this ironic detachment, Zizek (1989)
argues, that enables ideology to work as such. In fact, the members of any political,
82 | Marco Deseriis
forms of subjectivity springing from within the social bios. In this respect, Luther
Blissett is a fully post-modern project that does not create alternative narratives but
taps into the mainstream and borrows from pop culture imagery to expand its reach
and visibility.
When Wu Ming underlines that mythopoesis is not about creating false stories,
they are precisely emphasizing the positive side of third-order narratives and artificial
myths. To put it differently, they are suggesting that, if the news media offer a dramatic re-presentation of reality, we may better learn how to present our stories in a
dramatic fashion rather than limiting ourselves to debunking the media spin.
By inviting the audience to suspend disbelief and participate in a collective narration, the LBP also revived those poetic and performative aspects of oral culture that
entailed a close bond and a potential interchangeability between narrator and narratee.
In fact, the traditional storyteller, as Walter Benjamin (1968) notes, was always
part of the story he was telling, either because he experienced it directly or because
he heard it from someone else. Consequently, the storyteller encouraged his listeners to continue telling stories, so that the narratee gained potential access to the
same authority of the narrator simply by listening. Noting how traditional narrative
knowledge unrolls the pragmatic protocols enabling its own transmission, JeanFrancois Lyotard acutely notes that what is transmitted through these narratives is
the set of rules that constitutes the social bond (21).
From this angle, it should be clear why Wu Ming claims that myths and stories are
something living, something collective, something with which its possible to interact. To tell a story is a political activity in the primary sense of the word. Because to
tell a story is to share, that is, to make a community (in Baird 258).
Keeping in mind this performative and political function of storytelling, we can
group the LBPs interventions into two major areas: the actual performances and
interventions such as psychogeographic drifts, media hoaxes, and fake publications
which nurtured Blissetts myth as the Robin Rood of the information age;26 a consistent body of theoretical work, comprising mostly interviews and critical texts, focusing on the pragmatic rules and the HowTos that allowed for the reproduction and
proliferation of the multiple-use name. I will now try to articulate these two aspects
of mythopoiesis in their dialectical unity by referring to one of the most complicated
affairs in which the LBP was involved.
Media Homeopathy
Founded in 1963, Comunit Incontro is an established network of over two hundred
Catholic community centers scattered all over Italy for the rehabilitation of drug
addicts. Incontros founding father, Don Pierino Gelmini, is a well-known TV character
who has been at the forefront of prohibitionist marches and anti-pedophile crusades
for over thirty years.
Thus when, in December 1996, the Italian police arrests a middle-aged Cambodian
man on his way to Belgium, charging him with child trading, Blissett decides to seize
the opportunity and jumps on the bandwagon of moral panic.
On January 4, 1997, a man identifying himself as Aldo Curiotto, the official
spokesman for Comunit Incontro, phones Ansa, the main Italian newswire. Since
Incontro has a branch office in Thailand, Blissett, posing as a distressed Curiotto,
insinuates the doubt that there may be a Far East connection between Don Gelmini
and the Cambodian man: The Carabinieri did NOT arrest him, they are just interrogating him. Don Gelmini has NOT YET been charged with a traffic of child-abuse
videos.27 Predictably, Ansa diffuses the non-news of the disavowal and, after a few
hours, TV newscasts and newspapers run interviews with an unknowing Gelmini.
The phone prank on Don Gelmini was not an isolated coup but was part of an elaborate strategy of media homeopathy. The idea was to inject into the media bloodstream
stories whose patent falsity would eventually induce the media immune system into a
reaction of its own. (Instead of treating the symptom directly, homeopathic medicine contends that, by supplying the human body with a diluted substance that generates a symptom of a lesser intensity, the body can find its own resources to overcome the disease.)
Such a strategy had already yielded significant results in 1996, when the LBP
branch operating in Viterbo, a medieval town 60 miles north of Rome, fabricated one
of the more sophisticated and successful pranks of the entire LBP.
In January 1996, the LBP begin spray-painting a series of cryptic Satanic messages and swastikas on Viterbo city walls. As the local press begins investigating,
Blissett escalates his disinformation strategy by feeding the newspapers with a
series of letters insinuating a connection between members of the right-wing city
government and inexistent exoteric neo-Nazi groups. On a Saturday night in May,
knowing that the woods surrounding the city were to be cleaned the following day by
an environmentalist association, Blissett fabricates evidence of a black mass. On
Tuesday, Il Corriere di Viterbo, Il Tempo, and Il Messaggero provide extensive coverage of the environmentalists horrific discovery.
As the media hysteria mounts, the LBP founds the ultra-Catholic Comitato per la
Salvaguardia della Morale (Committee for the Safeguard of Morals), a fanatical
squad of vigilantes who claim to have begun their own nocturnal patrols to hunt down
the Satanists. In July, Il Corriere di Viterbo receives a videotape containing footage of
a black mass in which a screaming virgin is supposedly sacrificed (the video is
murky and the woman is always off-camera). When the alarmist campaign reaches its
zenith, the LBP delivers extensive proof of the fabrication to the national public TV
channel RAI Uno. The extended version of the video featuring the gruesome killing
of the virgin ends with a tarantella in which the Satanists and the virgin hold
hands, dance, and sing along.28 Visibly embarrassed, the Viterbo papers abandon
the Satanic trail for a while.29
84 | Marco Deseriis
While the Viterbo hoax is still unfolding, the Bolognese branch of the LBP decides
to duplicate the experiment in Bologna. In June 1996, a human skull is left in the
luggage lockers of the local train station with a message addressed to Il Resto del
Carlino, the most popular Bolognese tabloid. The note is signed by I Cacciatori di
Satana (The Satans Hunters), a mysterious group claiming to have subtracted the
skull to I Bambini di Satana (The Children of Satan), a notorious and actual existing
Satanic sect. Il Carlino runs a piece, and a few days later, Luther Blissett uncovers
the hoax by sending proof of the fabrication to other local newspapers.
I Bambini di Satana draws its notoriety from the fact that, throughout 1996,
Il Carlino has led a moral crusade against Marco Dimitri and other members of the
sect for having allegedly sexually abused a non-consensual 16-year-old girl during a
black mass. Although, once again, the national press is quick to jump on the bandwagon of moral panic, endorsing the baseless charges pressed by the prosecutor
Lucia Musti, the defendants do not take long to demonstrate that Dimitri, who is notoriously gay, has never engaged in child abuse, and that The Children of Satan are, in
fact, an adult consensual cult that has no connection whatsoever to pedophiles.
In 1997, Blissett sends to print the instant book Lasciate che i bimbi: Pedofilia
un pretesto per la caccia alla streghe [Let the Children: Pedophilia as a Pretext for
a Witch Hunt] a counter-investigation of the Bambini di Satana trail that reveals how
facts and witnesses have been meticulously manipulated in the service of an ultraconservative Catholic agenda.30 The book also sums up the LBPs media-homeopathic
strategy by juxtaposing the Bolognese trial and the Viterbese witch hunt: while the
former has been built up by an overzealous prosecutor with the complacent support
of the press, the latter is a pure mythopoeic invention of the LBP that the press has
managed to blow out of proportion.
Homeopathic remedies have proved effective to the extent that the Viterbese
press have been discredited by the national TV; at the same time, the Carlinos hoax
and the publication of Lasciate che i bimbi jolts the press into undoing Lucia Mustis
investigation and questioning the initial wave of sensationalist news and moral panic.
To put it simply, by checking on each other, the media have begun activating their own
immune system.
The fact that the book has hit a raw nerve becomes evident a few weeks after its
release when Lucia Musti files a libel suit against the publisher and the authors of
Let the Children for defamation and abuse of the right to critique.31 After a twoyear trial, the prosecutor obtains a partial victory: the author of the book, Roberto
Bui, is fined for defamation, whereas the publisher, Alberto Castelvecchi, is ordered
to withdraw the remaining copies from the market and destroy them.32 Meanwhile, as
the trial against Blissett goes on, the electronic version of the book is downloaded
and mirrored onto several websites engaging in a coordinated free speech campaign.
In 2000, as a consequence of another wave of media hysteria instigated this time by
the Sicilian priest Don Fortunato di Noto, three websites hosted by the Rete Civica
Romana, a public network managed by the City of Rome, are censored for publishing
materials not apt to children. One of them, the Avana BBS website, hosts a copy of
the book.33
As the publication of Let the Children snowballs into a real affaire involving publishers, sys-ads, priests, and politicians, the Bolognese LBP develops a theoretical
reflection on the historic and political function of national emergencies in Italy.
In Nemici dello Stato [Enemies of the State], Blissett notes that the mid-1990s
moral panic epitomizes the fear of the great disintermediation brought about by
the Internet.34 After the 1970s emergency laws against terrorism, and the 1980s
war on the mafia, Italian national emergencies were now shifting
from the molar (the clash between masses, the battlepiece [sic], the confrontation
on the stage of public life) to the molecular (the everyday micro-conflict, the control on
individual differences by information technologies) . . . The new molecular emergencies
serve to control and censor electronic communications, indeed, the behaviors of the
new immaterial workers who are re-appropriating their know-how and tendency to innovation, becoming ever more autonomous from capital as direct command on the workforce. (Blissett 1999)
From this angle, it should be clear why Blissetts homeopathic strategy was aimed
at debunking the media spin while counter-attacking the forces that dreaded and
threatened the newfound autonomy of immaterial workers. In other words, the
folk hero of the information age was not only a figure of the common productive
capacity of immaterial workers, but also of their ability to organize themselves
and rebuff the attacks coming from those forces, notably the Catholic church and its
secular arms.
By showing the extraordinary ability of becoming-other by impersonating, if only for
a while, the role of his opponents, Blissetts moves can also be seen as Aikido
techniquesa martial art that did not stop at the media, but found an ultimate
target in Blissett himself.
Seppuku!
Many subjectivities of the Luther Blissett Project Italian columns have decided to greet
the new millennium by committing seppuku, a ritual suicide. Suicide is the practical
86 | Marco Deseriis
The novel, the last book authored by Luther Blissett, was a bestseller and translated into several languages. Set in Germany in the sixteenth century, at the time of
the social unrest ignited by the Reformation and at the onset of the Gutenberg revolution, Q can be read as a political allegory. The hero changes identity several times
as he participates in peasant uprisings (the Anabaptists) and radical protestant
movements (the Movement of the Free Spirit) that seek to abolish private property,
religious authority, and secular privileges. Q, the mysterious emissary reporting on
the popular revolts to the Vatican, will eventually ascend to papacy. But the triumph
of the most conservative elements of the Catholic Church is not necessarily a
tragedy insofar as repression and restoration are unable to fully tame the ghosts of
the defeated. As McKenzie Wark notes, Its a question of a narrative resurrection,
where the return of the marginalized, the disempowered is still possible. A return, not
as victim, but as a different kind of hero. The kind of hero who works in situations,
does what is possible, and moves on. A Luther Blissett.40
88 | Marco Deseriis
Works Cited
Arns, Inke and Sylvia Sasse. Subversive
Affirmation. On Mimesis as Strategy of
Resistance. East Art Map: Contemporary Art and
Eastern Europe. Ed. Irwin, London: Afterall, 2006.
Notes
1. An unsigned article published in the daily Blic
on September 12, 1993 read: There is a rumor
around that these actions might actually be
works of art, albeit not conventional in the
slightest, planned and performed by one or
more persons in order to provoke the instinctive
reactions of those who find the dummies and
obviously mistake them for real corpses.
Eurotic. Excerpts from an article published in
90 | Marco Deseriis
92 | Marco Deseriis
Since the beginning of the building of the separation barrier by the Israeli government
in the Palestinian territories, dozens of artistic projects and art works have been created documenting, responding, criticizing, and condemning the wall. The barrier has
been a main focus of political art in the last few years triggering many artistic projects and tactics against its construction. The projects and works come from artists
from many disciplines; photographers, painters, video artists, performance, graffiti
writers, conceptual artists, architects, as well as political activists and local residents fighting for their own land. The constriction of the separation Wall is highly
controversial and artistic projects dealing with it raise many dilemmas. What role do
these practices play? What are their limitations and potentialities? How these practices are used; on one hand, to reduce the damage of the wall, or on the other, to
attempt to raise awareness of the harm of the wall or participate in the political struggle against it? What positive role can art have in this political construction project?
And why are so many artists attracted to do work on this Wall?
Barrier, Wall, Separation Fence
Israels barrier, wall, or separation fence across the West Bank is an architectural expression of a twenty-year old political strategy (Weizman) and although the
wall is the greatest construction project ever built by the state of Israel, no architects were involved in its construction.1 The wall was built by engineers subcontracted by the Israeli defense ministry. At the fourth convention of the Israel
Architects Association, Architect Gideon Harlap complained that no architects were
involved in designing the separation fence. The fence, he says, is not beautiful,
like the Great Wall of China, but is clumsy and ugly, and architects could have
contributed to its aesthetic design had they been allowed to participate in its planning in time (Gilerman).
The wall is part of a physical barrier consisting of a network of fences with vehiclebarrier trenches surrounded by wide exclusion area averaging 60 meters (90%) and
concrete walls up to eight meters high.2 Most of the barrier (over 95% of its total
length) consists of a multi-layered fence system ideally 50 meters in width. The
Israeli militarys preferred design has three fences, with pyramid-shaped stacks of
barbed wire for the two outer fences and a lighter-weight fence with intrusion detection equipment (controlled by a command and control system built by Elbit Ltd.) in the
middle. Patrol roads were mounted on both sides of the middle fence, as well as an
anti-vehicle ditch that was dug on the Palestinian side of the fence with a smooth
dirt strip on the Israeli side for intrusion tracking.3
Some sections (less than 5% of the total length) are constructed as a wall made
up of concrete slabs up to eight meters high and three meters wide. Occasionally,
due to topographic conditions, other sections of the barrier will reach up to 100
meters in width. Wall construction (5%) is more common in urban settings, such as
areas near Qalqilyah and Jerusalem, because it is narrower, requires less land, and
provides more protection against snipers. In all cases, there are regular observation
posts, automated sensing devices, and other technological apparatus. Gates at various points are manned by Israeli soldiers. The total length, as officially authorized,
will be 650 kilometers (403 miles).
The barrier is a highly controversial project. Supporters claim the barrier is a necessary tool protecting Israeli civilians from Palestinian terrorism, including suicide
bombing attacks in buses and bus stations, shopping centers, stores, restaurants,
and other public places, which has increased significantly since the al-Aqsa Intifada.
The Israeli defense ministry argues that the wall has helped reduce incidents of
terrorism by 90% from 2002 to 2005.4
Opponents claim that the barrier is an illegal attempt to annex Palestinian land
under the guise of security; violates international law; has the intent or effect of preempting final status negotiations; and severely restricts Palestinians who live nearby,
particularly obstructing ability to travel freely within the West Bank and to access
work in Israel, thereby undermining their economic, social, political, and cultural life.
Although the wall might decrease the number of terrorist attacks for the present, its
devastating effect could encourage much more violence and bloodshed in the future.
Beautifying the Wall
The most common documented and recognized element of the separation barrier is
the eight meter high concrete wall with its armed watchtowers. Its physical presence
is both threatening and haunting, but also strong and powerful. It is clear why both
supporters and opponents of the wall choose this very small part of the project as
96 | Ronen Eidelman
its visual symbol. Indisputably, the wall itself is an eyesore and it has a devastating
effect on the landscape. Ironically, the physical barrier makes the oppression of
Palestinians and the occupation more visible in conflict with the powers basic rationale to make the systems of oppression as unseen and inconspicuous as possible.
Therefore, from the earliest stages of the construction of the wall, the authorities
tried to hide and conceal its ugliness and what it symbolizes.
The paintings on the wall in the Gilo neighborhood of Jerusalem are an early example of the practice of concealment. The Gilo wall, constructed during the first weeks
of the second Intifada (uprising) in 2001, was built hastily to protect against gunfire
from the Palestinian town of Beit Jalla. It was made of two meter concrete blocks and
was around 100 meters long. It blocked the view of Bethlehem, the surrounding
villages and hills. Consequently, the Municipality of Jerusalem contracted artists to
decorate its side of the wall with murals and paintings which depict the missing view
of Beit Jala. However, these images represented only buildings and animals without
any of the Palestinian residents.
The murals were done by Jewish Russian immigrants living in Jerusalem at a cost
of 60,000 euros. Mikhail Morgenstern, one of the artists, said We do it because we
make the view better. He declared, Our scenes have nothing to do with what is actually happening on the other side of the wall (Reeves). In the words of Shlomo Brosh
of the Jerusalem Municipality who came up with the project, The idea was to make
the walls transparent, He added, If they have forced us to shield ourselves, then we
decided that at least we wouldnt give up the landscape that used to be there
(Gilerman).
The Missing residents and the fixed scenic view has a history in Israeli art as
the description of Painter Larry Abramson painting (on canvas) Tzuba by curator
Sarit Shapira demonstrates:
In his Tzuba series, Larry Abramson painted the same landscape that was depicted
years ago by Joseph Zaritzky, one of the triumvirate of the New Horizon group, and a
major ancestor of the Israeli abstraction. Carrying on the morphology of the Zaritzky
brushstroke, as well as adopting the greenish, greyish, bluish monochromatic tonality,
Abramson apparently obeys the order of the local artist discourse which announced
Israeli abstract painting as Zaritzky dynasty. One can even say that in placing himself
at the same standing point of the old master in the landscape and in repainting
Zaritzky references, Abramson asserts his belonging to a stratified local art history,
even a local artistic school. But while he acts as a disciple who follows his master,
Abramson also exposes the patriarchic oppressive method, scratching, trying to peel
off the seals and screen that constitute the canonic Israeli, Zionist representation. He
actually calls upon one of the most forbidden taboos of the Zionist rhetoric, the remnant, the silent testimony of a Palestinian presence that anticipated the Zionist territorialization. While the empty image less abstract painting of Zaritzky just suits what had
98 | Ronen Eidelman
Larry Abramson continued negotiating with the hidden landscapes and reacted to
these murals with his work Israeli abstract.
Apart from being a blatant act of occupation, the wall Israel is currently building
around itself is an ultimate act of denial, a desperate attempt to erase Palestine from
the Israeli landscape and consciousness once and for all. On the concrete slabs of a
wall separating Route 443 from a neighboring Palestinian village, the authorities have
You can see mountains, flowers, pastoral images, and also the facades of Jerusalem
stone houses with windows that do not overlook anything.
It is interesting to observe the difference in the attempts of Beautifying that
were done in more rural areas such as highway #6 using the agricultural elements of
the geographical area, and the references to historical Jerusalem architecture in
urban areas of the Jerusalem neighborhoods.
The Writing on the Wall
The Israeli authorities have made different attempts to make the wall less visible, to
beautify it, to make it more acceptable to the Israeli public and the international
community. The authorities believe in the necessity of the wall but understand that
its horrific physical presence works against the state so far as image and public relations are concerned. The opponents of the wall are faced with a different dilemma.
The wall must be shown, revealed, exposed, talked about; its presence and its consequences should reach as many people as possible. But contrary to the Israeli
authorities, their goal is to make the wall physically disappear, to do away with it. They
do not want to recognize the walls existence, or validate it, and they are careful not
to take action that accepts its presence. Thus, the challenge is to find ways of acting
against the wall without strengthening and confirming it.
The early forms of artistic expression on the wall were political graffiti denouncing
the wall. For example, in 2002, shortly after construction of the first stage of the wall
on the border of the town of Qalkiliya, a huge photocopy illustration of hands holding
prison bars illustrating the town behind the wall as a giant prison were hung by a
group of artists activists.6 In this first action on the wall to my knowledge, the
activists approached the wall with great fear, since it was not clear what the militarys
response would be. The illustration was used not only to communicate a message to
drivers passing by the wall, but also as a pretense for people to walk up to the wall
and learn the dangers for those approaching it. It is always safer to approach military
facilities with art, glue, and spray cans than with explosives, cutters, or even banners
with political slogans. All participants in the action were Israeli citizens and they
approached the wall from the Israeli side. The action went smoothly. Following that,
graffiti writing and murals coming from the wall-painting traditions of Berlin and
Belfast began popping up all around where the wall was built. The paintings were on
many different levels, from nave and primitive to professional writers and muralists
who came from around the world from such places as the United States, Mexico,
and Italy.
Creative Resistance
As the Barrier went up, resistance to it was established on all levels. Committees
of local residents and direct action groups of Palestinian, Israeli, and international
activists were established in response to the construction and the land confiscation
that followed (such as Pengon, Anarchist Against the wall, Taayush, and Gush-Shalom).
The Israeli and international groups worked in cooperation with Palestinians in a joint
non-violent struggle against the occupation and the wall. The struggles involved
demonstrations, marches, and direct action against the barrier structures as well as
a media campaign in Israel/Palestine and worldwide. With time, creative ways of
resistance and artistic and theatrical strategies were introduced and became tactics
that were used often in the struggle. This practice became especially notable in
the village of Bilin, located in the west of Ramallah, where there have been weekly
demonstrations against the fence built on their land for over three years. The villages
popular committee creates installations and sculptures as a regular part of the struggle. Each weekly demonstration has a specific theme, usually relating to relevant
historical or contemporary events, and sometimes is geared toward specific groups
such as children, women, and handicapped persons. Occasionally, dramatic theatrical performance marches are used to dramatize the current situation of the village
and its suffering from the wall and the occupation, such as a giant snake model
eating up the land. Creative direct action is also used, for example, demonstrators
locking themselves inside an iron cage with sheep to demonstrate that live stock are
also suffering from the land loss, or demonstrators stuffing themselves into barrels
symbolizing the holding on to the land. While these actions aim to symbolically show
the effects of the wall in the daily lives of the villagers, they simultaneously aim to
halt the work on the barrier and delay construction.
This kind of creative resistance emerged for several reasons. From an early stage,
it was clear that the chances of stopping the building of the wall physically on the
ground were slim, but still at every demonstration there is an attempt to reach the
route of the fence and block the work. This action is answered with rubber bullets,
tear gas, and other weapons of crowd dispersal. The demonstrators cannot succeed
in making it to the route because of the fierce military opposition, but by persisting
every week to try to make it to the wall, they can capture the publics attention to their
struggle and hope that public pressure can halt the work. Therefore, the demonstrators were interested in as much media attention as possible in order to get their message out to as many people as possible. Quickly they realized that they must bring
something new to each demonstration in order to keep media attention. Otherwise,
the demonstrations would become repetitive and the media would lose interest.
Also, by bringing an artistic and theatrical element to the demonstrations, the protesters hoped to lower the violent response of the Israeli military and police.
Moreover, this kind of resistance drew a more absurd picture of the militarys actions.
A soldier destroying a sculpture or a policeman beating a man dressed as a house
can rarely come out looking good.
The creative resistance not only worked to attract media attention, but also made
the demonstrations more attractive to the demonstrators themselves, both from the
village, from other villages, and from Israel and elsewhere. People looked forward to
seeing what the village would come up with the following week. This creative and
artistic expression also had a strong effect on the perception of the Palestinian struggle, turning the image of the Palestinian activist upside down: from a violent one to
a non-violent creative popular struggle. Referring to Jacques Rancires (2006)
take on the relationship between aesthetics and politics, in her paper Moulding
Resistance: Aesthetics and Politics in the Struggle of Bilin Against the wall, Noa Roei
describes this perceptive reversal:
the demonstrators use of artistic form becomes more than a media attentiongrabber. The sculpture-objects become the tools through which the clear division of
labour between the oppressors and the oppressed collapse, and the existing distribution of the sensible is reconceived. The demonstrators break through the boundaries
of their social identities, as they manifest themselves as occupied people and as free
artists at the same time. They assert their right to belong to a world that includes
leisure time for contemplation; they assert their right to voice their claims not only as
occupied people but also as men and women of the world (forthcoming).
In March 2006, the Minshar Gallery in Tel Aviv held a show with objects used in the
demonstration. Uzi Tzur, an art critic for Haartez newspaper, was exited by this act.
Bringing the objects to the gallery space and displaying them as sculptures on the
verge of the abstract, incommunicado from the place and from the activity, created
an infiltration of single political atoms to a protected art space. Akin to a Trojan horse
distributing black energy of political resistance, this exhibition indeed contained a
great energy (Tzur).
This act of the Minshar gallery was quite contradictory. On one hand, it was a
political act, bringing the struggle of the Bilin village to Tel Aviv, perceived as the
cultural and financial heart of Israel. On the other, it aestheticized a genuine political struggle and turned tools of resistance to art pieces in a white cube. Muhamad
Khatib, the head of the Bilin popular committee who was responsible for many of the
installations, does not refer to himself an artist; he does not see the objects he created as art, and is only interested in the political aspects of the show. He states
that the power and beauty of these tools that I made are expressed at the demonstration itself. Only there they are art in my eye (Gilerman). But he is willing to collaborate with the gallery to make his struggle as widely known as possible. Oded
Yedaya, the curator of the exhibition, is also interested in the political power of the
show, but also sees it as art that stands on its own as art (Gilerman). He is aware
of the artistic tradition of taking non-art objects and making them art by placing
them in the gallery and also understands that the original meaningthe objects
as political tools of resistance against oppressioncan be lost in this act. He contends that maybe the transfer of the objects to the art field cancels some power,
but it energizes them with intellectual power. People disregard this, but it is worth
a lot, on a political level but also on the aspect of the meaning it gives to life
(Gilerman).
We dont want it to be beautiful, we hate this wall. Go home
In his book about the Berlin wall, The wall Speaks, Rainer Hildebrandt addresses the
pursuit of the artist through art to prevail over the wall. He writes,
The Quest is still on for the great work of art that will overcome the wall. Yet something different occurred: the wall became interesting and worthwhile visiting and being
mulled over and also fatal for its constructer, and all this without accusation by picture
or the spoken word. And yet this incentive to artistic achievement was made possible
only through the erection of a monumental Wall of the fourth generation with juxtaposed concrete plates and inlaid tubes atop (Hildebrant).
According to Hildebrandt, the engineers of the GDR actually created the opportunity
for the Berlin wall as an artistic piece by making it architecturally comfortable for
artists to work on it. Joseph Beuys, who died in 1986 before the fall of the Berlin
wall, satirized the Berlin wall in 1964 by suggesting that it should be raised by five
centimeters, for better proportion, (Poerksen) as he put it. Bernhard Poerksen
refers to Beuyss suggestion as an act of subversion by an irritation.
Joseph Beuys does not negate the wall; he affirms its existence, but insists on a
need for a small correction. Like a therapist trained in the use of paradoxical intervention, he recognizes the symptoms and the problem (the wall), even reinforces it
somehow, but at the same time quietly shifts our attention in the direction of the
envisaged treatment: the ideological consciousness that made the wall possible in
the first place must be dissolved, the concrete in the minds must be softened
(Poerksen).
In his project BuyTheWall.com, Yoav Weis, an Israeli artist, sells pieces of the
separation wall and relates that to the merchandising of pieces of the Berlin wall
after its fall. He states,
Pieces of the wall are sure to become highly desirable souvenirs when Israel, which
has acknowledged that the wall is temporary, eventually dismantles it. Moreover, like
the Berlin wall, it is already covered with graffiti, some of them by established artists. It
is worth noting that those sections of the Berlin wall that were so decorated were the
first to sell and fetched the highest prices.7
Like Beuyss suggestion, Weis emphasizes the cynical aspects of the systems we live
in by exaggerating the logic of these systems, but of course, without acknowledging
that they are not serious.
Question: Is this a joke?
Answer: Hardly. Money is never funny and neither is the wall.
Question: Is this a protest against the wall?
Answer: Absolutely not. Im just trying to make a buck.8
One could make the wall even more visible. Art can bring attention to the crimes of
the construction of the wall not by fighting its existence, but through artistic acts
(even cynical ones) that use the architecture of the wall to highlight and publicize its
presence. Weiss is also linking to the fetishistic place the wall has taken in political
art and culture. The art in Bilin is used as a tactic, combined with other tactics to sustain and enrich the struggle, but in many cases, the art/artist dealing with the wall
has much less clear intentions.
In 2005, Banksy, a famous British street artist, made a trip to the West Bank,
where he painted massive images of escape and freedom on the sections of the wall
in the area of Jerusalem and Ramallah. The pieces themselvesscissors cutting
the wall, ladders, windows that look out at idyllic scenery, a girl floating by clutching
balloonsare very powerful and esthetically beautiful. They are huge in scope, many
of them are mixed media, their vision is simple and convey a message of human freedom, and have Banksys characteristic humor.
Banksy, who has a large fan base, used his work to make political statements
such as: The wall is illegal under international law and essentially turns Palestine
into the worlds largest open prison, but also called the wall the ultimate activity
holiday destination for graffiti writers.9
Galit Eilat, the director of the Israeli Center for Digital Art in Holon, told The
Jerusalem Post, commenting on Banksys work, that while she is constantly
approached by both Israeli and foreign artists interested in creating works related to
the security barrier, she holds a rather cynical view about their effect. Theres a
phrase we use, she said, about how everyone can make a living off the occupation
building contractors as well as artists. The wall is like a gigantic canvas that receives
everything that is applied to it. But the wall is no reason for a celebration. According
to Eilat, while some would argue that artwork on or along the wall underscores its presence and thus constitutes a critique of it, The Palestinians dont need its presence
underscored for them (Halkin). Banksy himself relates to this problem of his unwelcome intervention. He records on his website how an old Palestinian man said his
painting made the wall look beautiful. Banksy thanked him, only to be told: We dont
want it to be beautiful, we hate this wall. Go home.10
Trying to make the wall transparent
Artists without Walls is a group of approximately 20 Israeli and Palestinian artists
who have come together to create a forum for dialogue between individuals engaged
in all fields of art and culture . . . Through nonviolent and creative actions, Artists
Without Walls will seek to eradicate the lines of separation and the rhetoric of alienation and racism.11
One of the projects of the artists, attempting to negotiate the dilemma that Galit
Eilat, who is a member of the group, raised, took place on April 1, 2004 in Jerusalems
Abu Dis neighborhood. Two video cameras filmed what is happening on both sides
of the wall, and the material filmed by each of them was screened at the same time
on the other side of the fence. In this way, on each side of the wall, one saw scenes
from the other side, and the wall became transparent for several hours. At first, the
group considered screening various works on the wall, but this idea was rejected in the
belief that using the wall as a backdrop implies approval of its existence.
For a few hours, we will operate jointly, we will see and speak to one another, the
physical obstacles will be overcome, and the residents of Abu Dis will be able to see
what is happening on the other side of the wall.12
Abu Dis, 2004. Two video cameras filmed what is happening on both
sides of the wall, and the material filmed by each of them will be screened
at the same time on the other side of the fence.
While this idea could be seen as an artistic aesthetic exercise, working in the
group with the participation of local residents raised the political and ethical elements of the action. Artists Without Walls was created to give voice to the injustice
done to the Palestinians living on the other side of the wall. And this action was possible only through the local Palestinian residents teamwork with the visiting Israelis
to create a political and artistic achievement of both voiding the walls material existence by digital means and illustrating its monstrous presence. However, the artist
were very aware of the thin line they were walking on.
There is a danger in opening a window in the wall, for ultimately what we want and
what we came together for, is to do away with the wall altogether [] the wall is merely
an expression, in a concrete form, of what is already there, a high degree of segregation
and wish for separation, a mentality, a feeling which is widely present in the public []
so to work against the wall means working against this, changing the mentality [] the
question is what it means to work against it, in both publics, both the Palestinian and
the Israeli [] it means to know that public, and to know how to bring the issue of nonseparation in a way that still moves them.13
Against the wall not at the wall
There are many exhibitions and projects dealing with the wall, some of them present
purely a documentation of the situation, while others work as an artistic political
act. Three Cities Against the wall is an exhibition protesting the Separation
Wall which involved groups of artists in Ramallah, Palestine; Tel Aviv, Israel; and New
York City. The show was held in all three countries in November 2005. Through this
Three Cities Against the wall, beit Ha-Omanim, Tel Aviv, 2005.
Photos: coutesy of the exhibition collective
collaborative exhibition, the organizers, of which I was a part, and participating artists
aimed to draw attention to the reality of the wall and its disastrous effect on daily life.
By using the classic and clearly understood medium of an exhibition, we felt that
the artists could use the wall as a metaphor to educate the public. We believed that
artists from the various countries working together and uniting voices were more
likely to be heard and would therefore be better able to inform people about the true
nature of this catastrophic situation. The wall was made to separate and, through
this project, we were coming together. The exhibition intended to demonstrate the
fact that, within the Israeli and the American public, there is opposition to the wall.
Over sixty artists participated in the show and it was very interesting to observe
the different approaches of the artists from the various countries. The American
artists made very straightforward art, making clear statements against the wall and,
in most of their work, using visual elements of the wall in the art work. Several pieces
appeared to be demonstrating the artists duty to convince the viewer that the wall
really exists. Other works can be seen through Middle Eastern eyes as almost banal.
The Israeli artist made work that was ironic, witty but also sad, creating a feeling of
despair and pessimism. The artists related to the more general conflictual and violent situation they are living in, and in most cases, did not relate directly to the wall.
The Palestinian artists, on the other hand, almost did not deal with the wall or even
the occupation. Most of their works were abstract and expressionist paintings. In
most cases, the works were very much in a classic artistic tradition and expressed
Palestinian culture more than a direct political statement.
In the catalog of the exhibition, theorist Lin Chalozin-Dovrat explores these differences:
An additional look at the works of the exhibition reveals that things that are seen
from here are not necessarily seen from there. Palestinian art does not deal with the
banalization of evil. Those who are locked up on the other side of the wall are not able
to see it as banal. The state of things in which the roles of occupier and occupied are
played in a certain banal routine does not seem banal to Palestinians. The mechanism
of the anxiety of banality is not relevant to them either because in a situation where the
struggle for freedom of movement and for economic welfare is a daily fact, it is not
likely that one has time to grapple with the meaning of images. The Palestinian society
has not yet realized its legitimate aim for self-government along with its dubious hope
to maintain a democratic-capitalistic government that will exhaust its opponents by
imposing an atmosphere of political indifference. In this state of affairs art and resistance have different roles (Chalozin-Dovrat).
Chalozin-Dovrat argues that Palestinians use classic artistic tradition because political art would be too prosaic for them. An art exhibition is not a tool of resistance; it
could be used to publicize the struggle and its reasons, but it is a practice separate
from the political resistance. One could also argue that Israeli or international artists
are inspired by the wall and Palestinian artists stick to their classic artistic expressions, because the wall is attractive for artists who do not have to live with its
results. It is not appealing for the Palestinians, not only because it is banal as
Chalozin-Dovrat puts it, but also rather too real and horrible to deal with in an artistic
way. The reality of the wall can only be sexy for artists not affected, and those who
have the emotional distance from it can much more easily be creative about it.
We Passion Power and Control
Artists from Israel, Palestine, and all around the world had many projects and works
dealing with and relating to the wall. In this paper, I attempted to demonstrate a
small scope of what has been created in the last few years since the beginning of
the construction of the wall. Most of the projects and artworks are critical of the
Israeli governments construction of the wall and oppose the barrier project; some
as we have seen in Bilin are used as actual physical tools in the struggle. Different
approaches and strategies are used and the discussion of how one should relate to
the wall with ones artistic practice is raised by each work. But not only humanitarian and political motives can be attracting so many artists to the wall. There are
many aspects to the occupation of Palestine, and many other humanitarian disasters and political crimes in the Middle East and elsewhere that one can deal with.
So the reasons as to why artists are choosing mostly to work on the wall must be
examined.
Obviously, the wall has unique features, yet it is also part of a larger world phenomenon. We see the walls going up faster than it takes to plan an art exhibit, and
these walls are not only going up in Palestine: these Berlin Walls of the twenty-first
century are being built on the US-Mexico border, in the North African enclaves of
Ceute and Melilla, in Ukraine and other eastern borders of the European Union, and
also in our cities, in gated communities between the neighborhoods of the rich and
poor, and between the people and the structures of governments and corporations
everywhere. Yet since the wall in Palestine is so extremely visual, its presence is so
strong that one cannot ignore it, its power is also extremely attractive. Mushon ZerAviv, an Israeli artist living in New York whose work revolves around public space and
technology, sees this desire as a driving force of artistic creation:
We Passion Power and Control, the dark desires of art under surveillance, Artists
create through jealousy of authoritative powers and the desire to posses these powers
themselves . . .14
There is a constant love/hate relationship between artists and power. On one hand,
we want to protest against them, to raise awareness, to reveal the injustices,
but on the other hand, we simply envy that power, we WANT to posses the power of
surveillance, we protest against it, both because we think it is wrong and because we
actually wish WE had this enormous power at our disposal.
I observed a similar thing happen at the Three Cities Against the wall exhibition
(where Less Rain studio and I presented Graffiti Studio: Separation Wall). Artists
cried against the separation wall Israel is building in the West Bank but many works
actually longed for that power. There was a certain hidden desire kind of saying,
I wish I could build such an extraordinary spectacle.15
The Israeli government built the greatest and most expensive structure in the
young states history. This construction affects the lives of millions, altering their use
of space and time. It is changing the geographical, ecological, social, and political
status of the whole region in ways we cannot yet even conceive. As artists and architects, we stand powerless against it, trying to expose it, hide it, cover it, open it, or
even bring it down. But we cannot deny our smallness in comparison to it and therefore we are so attracted to it.
Works Cited
Abramsom, Larry, Artist Statement, Three cities
against the wall: Ramallah/Tel Aviv/New York.
Exhibition catalogue, Vox Pop, 2006, p. 18.
Btselem report, Separation Barrier Statistics.
30 April 2006.
Chalozin-Dovrat, Lin. On the struggle against the
anxiety of banality, Three cities against the wall:
Ramallah/Tel Aviv/New York. Exhibition catalogue,
Vox Pop, 2006, p. 10.
Gilerman, Dana. Art of Struggle, Haaretz, 28
March 2006.
. Trying to make the wall transparent,
Haaretz, 1 April 2004.
Halkin, Talya. UK graffiti artist tags wall,
The Jerusalem Post, 10.8.05.
Hildebrant, Rainer. Die Mauer Spricht/The wall
Speaks, Verlag Haus am Checkpoint Charlie,
1982.
Israeli defense ministry official website
Israels Security Fence, official website:
http://www.securityfence.mod.gov.il/Pages/
ENG/default.htm
, Haaretz,
Notes
1. The choice of words and names one uses
when referring to the wall is controversial. The
Palestinians and many opponents of the wall call
it the Apartheid Wall and The Racist Wall,
while the Israeli government and its supporters
call it the security barrier or fence. The
common Neutral name is the separation
barrier and the words fence or wall are used
according to the location one is referring to.
2. Btselem report, Separation Barrier Statistics.
http://www.btselem.org/english/Separation_
Barrier/Statistics.asp.
3. http://www.securityfence.mod.gov.il/
Pages/ENG/questions.htm.
9. www.banksy.co.uk/.
10. www.banksy.co.uk/.
11. http://pia.omweb.org/modules/news/.
12. http://pia.omweb.org/modules/news./
of the Weimar Republic in 1919. Opposed to the further consolidation of German state
and military power, Baader announced his opposition at the Weimar National Assembly.
Declaring himself representative of the Central Dada Council of the World Revolution,
Baader attacked the attending members, comparing Weimar to the Stations of the
Cross. Following his denunciations of the German state, he proceeded to distribute a
pamphlet entitled Das Grne Pferd (the Green Horse), printed with the slogan Dadaists
against Weimar, to members of the assembly. In the furor that followed, Baader was
dragged from the parliament by police, while simultaneously hurling the pamphlets into
the assembly and press boxes (Foster 9). In an effort to consolidate his actions, three
days following the event, Baader took to the streets proclaiming the Socialist candidate, Philip Scheidemann, as the Ehrendada (honorary Dada).
Like their Dadaist predecessors, early interventions of the Situationist International
(S.I.) used performative tactics to disrupt conditions reproductive of capitalist relations of alienation and exploitation.1 These actions took place around the time when
the French faction began to conceptualize what it termed the constructed situation.
Motivated by their heritage from the avant-gardes, the early members of S.I. were outraged by what they perceived to be the hijacking of aesthetic experience by economic
markets and cultural capitalizations. In 1958, a section of the group (including S.I.
co-founder Guy Debord) decided to sabotage the International Assembly of Art
Critics in Belgium. The group issued a statement condemning the event for its institutionalization and commercialization of art, and called for the uprising of new and
subversive aesthetic ideologies. A direct offensive was launched in which the attending critics were bombarded with the mass circulation of the protesting text. S.I. insurgents handed out copies, read the text over the phone, and forced their way into the
Press Club throwing pamphlets into the crowd. Leaflets were also thrown from building windows and cars. Police were called, the text was banned from being reprinted
by the press, and members of the group were later threatened with prosecution
(Situationst International, Action in Belgium).
Around a half-century after the Situationists proposed the constructed situation
as a means to invoke real individual fulfillment through the collective takeover of
the world (Preliminary Problems), campaigners with Berlin Umsonst (Berlin for free),
in solidarity with other European groups, were taking over the public transport system. Under the slogan Alles fr alle, und zwar umsonst! (everything for everyone,
and for free!), the Pinker Punkt (Pink PointRide for Free) offensive of 2005 was a
response to the re-structurization of student discount cards and the fare increase
(Berlin Umsonst, Interview). The campaign began with the mass printing and distribution of fake transport tickets, topographically identical to the original bearing the
Berlin Umsonst propaganda replacing the instructions for use. This was succeeded by
a sustained sticker and information operation, which climaxed with the occupation
of trains and encouragement of the public to travel on city transport without paying.
As part of the attempt to make the action less alienating to a broader public, the
titling of the action, Pinker Punkt, attempted to redefine the practice of schwarzfahren (riding black/fare-dodging) by queering its racist and criminal associations.
To facilitate free group travel, central gathering spots were set up at various train stations. In Berlin, participation fluctuated heavily from around three to over fifty people
traveling together for free over the course of weeks (Berlin Umsonst, Email). Each
group traveling had experienced members with them who had strategies to deal with
legal issues, and participants were repeatedly informed of their rights and given
instructions on what to do in order to minimize any anxiety about state repression.
Passengers on the trains were also made aware of the action, so as not to cause discomfort if inspectors confronted the travelers. After the encounters had taken place,
campaigners planned a fundraising event to cover the costs of the fines incurred, so
as to further strengthen a spirit of solidarity and community (Eshelman).
These three (non-metonymic) examples begin to illustrate what I call the performative encounter. Beyond their singularities as eventsdivergent in terms of
campaign focus, objective, political ideology, and sub-cultural identificationthese
instances converge around an ethic central to the praxis form. They purport a certain
aesthetic, creative, and affective modality predicated on the desire for emancipation
and self-determination. This is enabled through principles of active participation and
reciprocal communication. Departing from what is commonly understood as a typical
political platform, this modality may be seen as the kind of activity that Brian
Massumi speaks of when he calls for an aesthetic politics whose aim would be to
expand the range of affective potential (235).
Massumis pronouncement for the need of such aesthetic politics corresponds to
consternation around the question of specialization coming from within the radical
left milieu. Essays such as Andrew Xs infamous Give up Activism, Autonome
A.F.R.I.K.A Gruppes Communication GuerrillaTransversality in Everyday Life?,
and Angela Mitropoulos and Brett Neilsons On the Borders of the PoliticalAt the
Borders of Activism have all directed attention to the impasses plaguing political
organizing. They argue that contemporary forms of organizing, despite intentions otherwise, often still reproduce hierarchies of identification between activists as specialists or experts and nonactivists (the public) as the unenlightened masses.2
In this context, Massumis proposal for a performative politics capable of breaking
the systematic reliance upon the hardening of division along identity lines (235)
associated with forms of political organization predicated on ideological doctrines or
hierarchies of participation, becomes a potential line of flight from the specialist (in
this case artist/activist) ghetto.
But how might such an aesthetic political praxis be thought about given its
multiplicitous forms of manifestation? One point of entry is the performative
encounter introduced in the three instances above. In order to reveal the significance
Heartfield, and Wieland Herzfelde. Already engaged with the publication and distribution of left-wing periodicals such as Die Freie Strasse (1915) and the Neue Jugend
(1916), the possibility of the further merging of the political with the aesthetic was
seen as vital to revolutionary mobilization (Willett 2829).
From the outset, the Berlin Dadaists made clear their disgust for the German bourgeois idolization of art, culture, and idealism. According to Huelsenbeck, this was
because it served to keep the populace on its knees in the worship of some transcendental great spirit with their faces turned away from the turmoil on the streets
(Harrison and Wood 260). In response to what they saw as the troubling ineffectiveness of art to critically intervene in these conditions, they aspired toward the creation
of an aesthetic capable of viscerally interacting with the socio-political sphere. This
was announced through their rejection of conventional creative modes in favor of new
assemblages of aesthetic forms. Live events or performative encountersthe Dada
outrageswere considered one such means in the reaffirmation of the political
dimension to art. Anarchistic performances by the group, such as that of Baader
introduced previously, enacted the maelstrom of the political through the aesthetic,
presenting their content through the structure of outside, non-art events rather than
to represent[ing] the worlds events through traditional art genres (Foster 5). These
events were conceived to embody the immediacy of the quotidian and incorporated
agitational manifestos, pure-onomatopoetic or vowel-sound, nonsensical and
simultaneous actions, provocative interactions with their spectators, cabaret, cinema, improvisation and anti-illusionist scenic design (Gordon 114). As Stephen
Foster argues, the performance event was thus seen by the Dadists as a liminal
moment acting to rupture the everyday narrative to bring about some sort of change
(311). This tactic was effectively used by the Dadaists as a means for communicating their dissent in an interactive way. According to Foster, the event acted for avantgarde artists as an instrument for achieving, in reality or by illusion, a positioning
of themselves and their audiences in a hostile and self-destructive world and as a
potential instrument of change (3).
The negation of previous representational modes in favor of the performative
encounter was premised upon its determination as a medium through which to immediately challenge socio-political consciousness and ideological persuasion. The selfconception of the Berlin Dadaists as artists of the revolution was unequivocally
fuelled by their identification with the uprising of the Bolsheviks and the triumph of
early Soviet communism. This equivocation went further than mere rhetoric; as
Huelsenbeck announced in his 1920 manifesto with typical Dada lan,
Dada is German Bolshevism. The bourgeois must be deprived of the opportunities
to buy up art for his justification. Art should altogether get a sound thrashing, and
Dada stands for the thrashing with all the vehemence of its limited nature (Harrison
and Wood 262)
Inspired by Lenins (1902) vanguardthose professional revolutionaries and working-class militants necessary to lead and organize the masses into revoltthe
Dadaists considered themselves the aesthetic vanguard of the people. Artists were
considered essential figures to the provocation of a revolutionary consciousness and
desire for emancipation through their creative medium. This did not mean that they
understood themselves as being outside this multitude in any way. Rather, the Berlin
Dadaists saw themselves as embedded within, and in service of, the revolution. From
this identification, the project of the Berlin Dadaists was underpinned by a paradox:
their role as provocateurs of social consciousness (as specialists in change), simultaneous with their desire to amalgamate the aesthetic realm and everyday struggles
and thus end their autonomous delineation. While negating conventional aesthetic
relationships through denouncement of the autonomous organic artwork, unequivocally politicizing the avant-garde artwork, and developing the interventional dimension
of the aesthetic for the political, the Berlin Dada initiative did not fulfill its desire for
the subsumption of the aesthetic into the quotidian. Art did not become correlative
to political life. Instead, the strength of the Dadaist project as one intent on the
decomposition of the institutionalization of art, surmises aesthetic philosopher
Gerald Raunig, lay more in the way in which it
[] subjected production conditions to an examination with the desiring-machine,
igniting a cheerful deterritorialisation beyond all territorialities of nation and party with
its anti-militarist, internationalist, anarchic practice. As long as it undertook this risk
within the framework of the strongest attacks on art and under threat of beatings or
forced labor for artists specifically within the manageable and limited spaces of art, it
remained successful (2007: 24).
Thus, while the transgressive mobilizations of the Dadaists were regaled for their
aesthetic instrumentality, their political transgressions were met with less enthusiasm. As Gilles Deleuze and Flix Guattari wryly concluded politics is not the
strongest facet of the Dadaists (1983: 148). The steady recuperation of aberrant
artistic gestures back into the canon of the aesthetic institution led, for the Dadaists
as with much of the avant-garde, to the foreclosure of any significant intervention into
the field of politics through artistic entropy. Their highly publicized nihilism and their
self-promoted elevation as revolutionary artists and vanguards made them easy targets for the machinations of fetishization and cultural capitalization. From the perception of Berlin Dada as the lenfant terrible of the avant-garde, in conjunction with the
impasses around their contradictory political subject position, it is not difficult to discern how and why slippages between their political and social ideal, and its realization, occurred.
Some of these idiosyncrasies found themselves obliquely addressed in the
movement of the Situationist International (S.I.) over three decades later. Where the
Berlin Dadaists consolidated their objectives around the sublation of art into life,
the S.I. sought the supersession of both into a new environment. For the S.I.intent
on avoiding an uncritical perpetuation of the avant-gardist paradigmit was the
purely negative program of Dada that precipitated its demise through its rejection
of any affirmative or even mutable revolutionary ontology. The wholly reactionary
nihilism of Dada was considered (initially) strategically necessary, but fundamentally
untenable by the S.I. They declared the positive composition of radical subjectivities
and non-ideological, a-hierarchical experiential modalities vital to the propagation of
emancipatory states (Vaneigem; Situationist International, Debord Report and
Editorial).
Unlike the Berlin Dadaists who were explicit in their solidarity with the Bolshevik
struggle, the S.I. detected principles of separation underpinning Lenins structures of
organization. The organizational autocracy of Soviet-inspired communism generated
in the Situationists a virulent disregard for reformist Party apparatuses such as
those of the PCF, CGT (the French Communist Party and its labor union) and their
associates. The deviation of Situationist operative models from such structures was
asserted through their experimentation with creative and aesthetic strategies. These
aspired toward the liberation of desire and processes of subjectivation from what Guy
Debord referred to as the society of the spectacle. This concept described for Debord
the way in which the relations between images were progressively replacing intersubjective relationships between individuals and collective bodies (and vice versa) as
cultural and social experience became circulated in a regime of commodities. Thus,
the spectacle acted to mediate social relations between individuals, isolating them
from everyday life much in the same way that capitalist economy isolates the producer from the commodity and its dissemination. This conceptualization signified
a migration of Marxs theories of alienation underpinning processes of production/
consumption into the terrain of everyday relationships. For Debord, separation
reigned as the alpha and omega of quotidian experience dominated by spectacular
alienation (1983: 8). Moreover, the pervasive nature of the spectacle led Debord to
conclude that it is not some state removed from that of reality, but rather a constituent of that reality. As he wrote, the spectacle, grasped in its totality, is both the
result and the project of the existing mode of production. It is not a supplement to
the real world, an additional decoration. It is the heart of the unrealism of the real
society (1983: 2).
This colonization of daily life inherent to modern capitalistic production could only
be superseded for the S.I. through emancipatory self-determination by the individual
and collective social body. From their early inceptions, the Situationists considered
one of their central purposes the construction of situations as intervention into
this mechanism of subjugation and alienation (Debord, 2004: 44). The constructed
situation was defined in 1958 as a moment of life concretely and deliberately constructed by the collective organization of a unitary ambiance and game of events
To facilitate this, Debord and the S.I. separated the activity of the livers within the
situation into a temporary tri-tiered hierarchy, a logistical or functional division as
such (Raunig, 2007: 175). At the apex of this division was the director or producer
responsible for coordinating the basic elements necessary for the construction of
the decor and for working out certain interventions in the events (Situationist
International, 1981: 44). Subordinated under the director or producer were the
direct agents living the situation, who have taken part in creating the collective project and worked on the practical composition of the ambiance (44). At the bottom of
this organizational hierarchy remained the few passive spectators who have not participated in the constructive work, who should be forced into action (44).
What becomes clear from this description is that, as Raunig has suggested, the
audience was thereby placed in an impossible position. To address the conflictive
nature of this position, Raunig proposes two alternatives: either an affirmation and
designation of the audience as such (and thereby using this position as a means for
commentary or action itself), or an opening up of the position to the complexity of
political processes (2007: 176). For Raunig, it is precisely the latter that was later
achieved by the S.I., seen in the more pronounced politicization in their projects from
the late 1960s onward; here he cites the example of their transversals through art
and revolutionary machines during their participation in events around the Parisian
riots of 1968 (177178). What Raunigs proposition brings to light, then, is a new
consideration of the activity of the Situationist International in terms of the potential
the constructed situation opened up in the political realm. As Raunig writes, Starting
from performatively processing the situation and its necessary hierarchy the S.I.
developed a practice of a pre-productive opening of the situation and its viveurs,
igniting a spark that suspended its organizers (177).
Although we would be remiss in underestimating the importance of this transversal between aesthetic and revolutionary machines, we must wonder if this spark
ever wholly suspended the delimitation of its specialist organizers from its nonspecialist participants in a cacophony of insurrection and re-claimation of daily life.4
While Raunigs observations on the role of the organizer can certainly be seen in the
later writings and activities of the S.I., perhaps it is nonetheless useful to return to
the question of the audience in those earlier manifestos committed to the constructed situation, and especially to what this may have meant to its playing out. In
1958, the S.I. readily acknowledged that the establishment of a director within the
situation was only to be a temporary one, stating, this relation between the director
and the livers of the situation must naturally never become a permanent specialization. Its only a matter of a temporary subordination of a team of situationists to the
person responsible for a particular project (Situationist International, 1981: 44).
While Debord stressed that this directorial role was only to be transitory, it nonetheless immediately designated a particular method to the situation which was, at any
available with which to imagine how the situation might have materially played out.
What the conceptualization of the situation did, in terms of its political effect, was
decisively transverse beyond an aesthetic realm into the realm of the quotidian and
the political. In the constructed situation, the line of flight bifurcated from the avantgardist intention toward the subsumption of art into life. This is because, as Giorgio
Agamben explains, the situation can be seen as neither the becoming-art of life, nor
the becoming-life of art (77). Rather, it is a point of indifference between life and
art, where both undergo a decisive metamorphosis simultaneously (77).
It was not only the Situationists transformation of the avant-garde aesthetic
endeavor, but also their ventures in experimental organization that aroused the attention of Parisian intellectual circles. Their breadth of influence in terms of a generalist
rejection of the subordinative disciplines of political parties, unions, and ideological
orthodoxies was picked up on by Guattariso much so that, according to Raunig,
Guattari found his prototype for his theorem of the subject group in the movement
of March 22nd, which was triggered in early 1968 by the Situationist enrages [the
enraged ones] of Nanterre (2007: 180). It is through Guattaris post-individualistic
theorizations of the subject group, transversality and of collective desire that it
becomes interesting to preliminarily examine how a more recent articulation of this
performative encounter differs from its predecessors. What such concepts from
Guattari provide are a way to discern how the audience of the Berlin Dadaists and the
participant of the S.I. is transformed into a constituent of the encounter in the
Umsonst campaigns, for instance.
Further distancing themselves from those organizational models reviled by the
Situationists, the methods adopted in some of the Umsonst campaigns over the past
five years have taken on a more everyday vernacular. This is seen in campaigns
around public transport such as the Pinker Punkt (2005) described earlier, Nulltarif
(2003), Stadtrundfahrt (2004), and around cultural resources such as Kino Umsonst
(2003), Le Tigre at the Volksbhne Umsonst (2004), and MoMA Umsonst (2004),
among others.5 The decision to work on this level of the everyday was a strategic one
because, as a campaigner with Hamburg Umsonst explained, we address whoever
is there and sees what we do, and we invite people to re-think and to join us
(Dresden and Hamburg Umsonst). For Umsonst, the uncertainty of participants in the
encounter signals the necessity for an open politics (neither bound to Marxism nor
anarchism, but strongly reminiscent of aspects of both), which is partially furnished
through the disruption of an encompassing political ideology in favor of what
was described by a Berlin Umsonst campaigner as an orientation-less left (Berlin
Umsonst, Interview). This is further ameliorated through the incorporation of organizational techniques, which when enacted in juxtaposition with creative, pleasurable
tactics, enable a more accessible, less hierarchical platform from which to assemble
collective enunciations of desire.6
Precisely what Guattari saw as emerging from the experimental organization of the
S.I. in terms of subject groups, is what is approached in the composition of the
Umsonst campaigns. Through his work at the La Borde clinic, Guattari produced an
analysis of group formation within institutional environments in which he distinguished two interconnected and morphological types of group: the subjugated group
and the subject group. The subjugated/dependent group includes those constantly
subsumed to Power in some form (which is correlative of their desire for authoritarianism), and are usually linked to molar activity, being totalizing and, as commentator Mark Seem suggests, global in ideology (38). The principal characteristic for
Guattari is the groups incapacity for statement; for the subjugated group only its
cause is heard, but no one knows where or by whom, or when (1984: 14). This coincides with the alienation of the subjugated group imposed by outside sources, and
its subsequent withdrawal into protective group fantasy and insularity (ibid). As Gary
Genosko clarifies, the unity of the subjugated group is defined by external
interpellation (84).
Applying Guattaris analysis outside of the institutional setting, this according to
Genosko, is the problem that confronts the ultra-leftist militant who gets swept into
the phantasms typical of the subjugated group and tends to get hung up on the significations produced by the leadership rather than producing their own signifiers and
speaking in the name of the institutions they create adequate to the course of their
actions (96). For Guattari, group subjects/subject groups are conditionally opposed
to subjugated groups. These groups are molecular by nature, localized, and generative of processes of becoming-action rather than encompassing structures. Unlike
the external determination dictating the subjugated group, the subject group
endeavours to control its own behaviour and elucidate its object, and in this case
can produce its own tools of elucidation (Guattari, 1984: 14). It thus upholds an
active position in terms of its own project. This implies that, for the individual participating in the subject group, there is the means for articulation and signification in a
milieu of interdependence and difference which is synchronously unified through the
collective process. As Genosko proposes, the subject group is a kind of group in
fusion [. . .] come together in the flash of common praxis, in mutual reciprocity
rather than mutual Otherness (86).
Through Genoskos description of the collective affirmatively arising out of the
flash of common praxis, we immediately begin to see the potential that Guattari
envisaged in this new organizational structure: a rhizomatic, non-representative, nonprogrammatic common assemblage of singularities. The campaigns of Umsonst
respond to the gaps in the experiments of the S.I., in terms of establishing the terrain for a potential subject group in the performative encounter, by way of their
dedication to the composition of a collaborative transitory collective. For Guattari,
a subject group is not embodied in a delegated individual who can claim to speak
different groups and singularities. This had distinctly political consequences for, as
Genosko explicates,
transversality was a key element of a militant practice aiming at a rupture with
inherited models of organization. To transversalize the organization of a given institution is a creative act giving rise to subject groups capable of internally generating and
directing their own projects, ensuring that organization remains close to the groups
themselves, while simultaneously avoiding the slide into bureaucratic sclerosis (96).
To illustrate how transversality functions in the performative encounters of Umsonst,
we can refer to two characteristics intrinsic to their composition: the already mentioned
egalitarianism concerning the participant as a negation of the artist/activist as specialist, and the dependence on the participant in the constitution of the encounter.
In order to understand the campaigns of Umsonst themselves as transversal practices that synchronously disrupt the possibilities of specialist identification (as both
artists and activists), we can draw upon Susan Kellys employment of the term. Kelly
uses transversality to speak about modes of praxis that deliberately attempt to
de-territorialize the categories, disciplines, and institutions they move across, evoking
new terrains of open co-operation between different activist, artistic, social and political practices (Kelly, 2005). These transversal modes do not signify a permanent interdisciplinarity between the fields, but rather create temporary mutant conjunctions and
coalitions through a movement of accumulation (not absorption), inherently changing
the fields and institutions in the process. As such transversality is a vehicle of rupture and convergence in a constant state of becoming, a form or mode of operation
constituted through events, collective alliances, and transitory organizations. It is also
linked to notions of production, for in this movement it produces subjectivities and
self-engendering practices that seek to create their own signifiers and systems of
value (Kelly, 2005). Umsonst, as a collation of subject groups, enacts this creation of
becoming-subjectivity through its transversal elements, which can produce, as both
Guattari and Kelly argue, autopoietic and self-valorizing modalities of signification.
The adaptation of such transversal states by radical political groups such as
Umsonst and others also recently involved in the networks of protest movements
against economic globalization, thus marks a notable shift in artistic and political
modes. Simply put, it is here that, as Raunig points out,
artistic-political practices finally seem to have left behind the dichotomy between art
and activism. The activists hardly seek their own success in the arts field, nor are they
striving for special distinction. Nonetheless, they employ methods and strategies of art
history or current artistic practice. These actions create a new terrain of transversality,
which is neither part of the artistic field nor of the political field in its narrow sense
(2002).
What is demonstrated, then, is an attempt to conceive of practices such as those of
Umsonst outside of, across, and between the boundaries enforced by disciplinary
Works Cited
Agamben, G. Means Without End: Notes On
Politics. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2000.
Autonome A.F.R.I.K.A Gruppe. Communication
GuerrillaTransversality in Everyday Life?
European Institute for Progressive Cultural
Politics. Trans. Aileen Derieg (2002). 10 May
2005 http://eipcp.net/transversal/1202/
aag1/en.
Berlin Umsonst. For a pleasant life now!
Pamphlet. Berlin: Date unknown.
. Personal email correspondence with A.
Kanngieser. 7 September 2007.
. Personal interview with A. Kanngieser.
Berlin, Germany. 14 November 2006.
Brger, Peter. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Eds.
W. Godzich and J. Schulte-Sasse. Trans. M.
Shaw. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.
de Angelis, M. The beginning of history: value
struggles and global capital. London: Pluto,
2007.
Debord, G. Report on the Construction of
Situations and on the Terms of Organization and
Action of the International Situationist Tendency.
(1957). Guy Debord and the Situationist
International: Texts and Documents. Ed. T.
McDonough. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 2004.
2951.
Notes
1. As Gerald Raunig (2008) recently pointed out,
while the tactic may have signified coincidental
characteristics, ideologically the intervention of
Baader and early Situationist actions bifurcated
notably. While Baaders action signaled an
incipient demonstration against (but within
the parameters of) the state bureaucracy of
parliamentary governance and its representative
democracies, the encounter of the Situationists
already contained vestiges of their later objective
toward the supersession of art and politics
beyond any kind of reformism or state
engagement.
2. To explicate this point further, for X, the
self-equivocation of the activist as expert or
specialist in social change is a debilitating one,
acting not only to alienate the activist from the
public and elevate the activist in a vertical
relationship of value/authority over the
nonactivist, but also acting to estrange political
labor from daily life. This dyadic separation
of political work from everyday life further
compounds the perception of activism as a
specialized activity imbued with a sense of
militancy, severity, sectarianism, and exclusivity.
As Mitropoulos and Neilson have similarly
observed, activist is not a term that coincides
with those who engage in political activities.
Rather, activist is the demarcation of an identity
and community that privileges particular kinds of
activities, and forms of relation, by defining them
as properly political. And what is deemed proper,
for the most part, are the kinds of appropriation
that make representational claims possible [. . .]
one does not speak, or act, for oneself, but for
othersand, oftentimes, these others tend to be
framed as ordinary people [who] are assigned a
unity and homogeneity in similar fashion (np).
3. As the Situationists clarified in 1958 in their
paper Definitions, drive: a mode of
experimental behaviour linked to the conditions
of urban society: a technique of transient
passage through varied ambiances [. . .]
dtournement: short for: detournement of
preexisting aesthetic elements. The integration
of present or past artistic production into a
superior construction of a milieu. In this sense
Cultural activism constitutes one front in the battle over the peoples minds and
hearts. In large part, it is a struggle to convey dissident viewpoints, truth claims, and
alternative significations to the public by making use of the means to which activists
are able to gain access. The established for-profit media outlets owned by corporations and influenced by governments are usually inaccessible. Activists, therefore,
resort to alternative channels that are either created by or salvaged by activists
themselves.
But where do the activists stand? Lets look at the ancestral struggle. A century
ago, before the ruin of the Great War, the international labor movement was shaking
the world to its core. Governments were falling, wars were failing, humanity collectively felt itself to be on the edge of the new. The so-called conscious elements within
the movement, the vanguard, was involved in a battle of ideas against ruling ideology. The means to this struggle was termed agit-prop, agitation and propaganda,
long before the term came to be negatively associated with falsification and the
party line, and simply meant inspiration and the dissemination of ideas. Whatever
the failings of classical agit-prop, it was solidly grounded in the radical movement
of political subjects seeking change. When a flag was burned, it meant, desert the
national army and boycott war bonds; a poster depicting capitalist greed meant
support your fellow worker and union.
The purpose of this essay is to cast a critical look at detournement (the meaning of which will be discussed below) as an activist tactic in the form of adbusting
within the wider sphere of culture jamming practices. Culture jamming has
appeared in recent years as a form of agit-prop in contemporary cultural activism.
As it poses a significant influence within the movement, a critical look at adbusting
in particular may shed light on the potentials and pitfalls of contemporary cultural
activism.
Granted that this new means of cultural activism creates interesting possibilities
of resistance and opposition without falling into the dogmatism from which many earlier strategies of ideological struggle in the twentieth century suffered, I nevertheless
want to draw attention to the theoretical pitfalls and the self-crippling effects of the
tendency to promote culture jamming not as a strategy but as the social struggle
itself, and reaffirm the importance of a positively articulated, alternative political program for social change.
The discussion will frame culture jamming as an answer to the difficulties faced
by alternative media, and include references to Kalle Lasn as a spokesperson of
Adbusters, Situationism as a historical antecedent of Adbusting, and other culture
jamming tactics. It will present a critique based on a Marxist conceptualization of
money as an inherently alienated means, the cynical political subject of Slavoj Zizek
and Michael Albert, and criticism of the notion of consumer society and the accompanying discourse of needs. Finally, two contemporary cases of cultural activism
with which the author is familiar will be presented as hints to the way forward, inasmuch as they are examples of cultural activism which stand as integral parts of a
concrete social movement of active, resisting subjects.
While cultural activism consists of complex and diverse practices and dynamics
that cannot be reduced to a single overarching phenomenon, the tendency that I
will criticize is crystallized in, and is represented by the adbusters practice, and
I will infer from there. Let me first explain these terms and their claim to political
subversion.
Culture jamming as a tactic of political subversion and cultural protest arrives
with an admittedly attractive shot at a solution to the woes of activist access to channels of communication. Instead of trying to build an alternative from scratch, why not
capitalize on the ubiquity of corporate messages, ads, and media by finding a way to
use them against themselves? To this end, culture jammers focus on activities such
as altering billboards, parodying advertisements, and spoofing websites. The technique of adbusting, for example, involves modifying a commercial advertisement or
creating a fake one that mimics the look and feel of the original to proclaim a message that criticizes or mocks the targeted company. An example is the adbusted version of an Absolute Vodka ad, where the caption is replaced to read Absolute
Impotence, and the image of the vodka bottle is modified to resemble a failing erection. The new subvertisement aims to uncool the pricey and hip beverage by
revealing an undesirable fact of alcohol consumption that was previously hidden.
Another example is the infamous fake WTO website run by an activist collective
called The Yes Men at gatt.org, which mimics the official WTO site and runs stories
with titles such as WTO Announces Formalized Slavery Market for Africa. The Yes
Men have also appeared on TV and spoken at conferences upon request by reporters
and institutions unaware of the fact that gatt.org is a hoax.
With the adbusting technique, and culture jamming in general, the image or
another kind of cultural artifact retains all of its previous cultural investment in
terms of recognition, prestige, and coolness kindly provided by the adversaries themselves. This corporate or governmental investment is then detourned, meaning it is
hijacked and led astray to convey a dissident message. The process is analogous to
gangs of revolutionaries robbing banks and liberating the cash to finance their
struggles. The capital at stake is only cultural rather than economic. Therefore, compared to creating alternative media, culture jamming seems to offer more bang for
the activist buck, so to speak.
If detournement in the form of culture jamming is considered to be the new agitprop, where is the new movement? The thing that makes Kalle Lasn, author of Culture
Jam and the editor of Adbusters magazine, one of the most significant spokespeople
for adbusting and also the principal focus of my critique, is his answer to this question. According to Lasn, culture jamming is the movement of today. It is the strategy
of action today in the way the civil rights movement was the movement of the 60s,
feminism was the movement of the 70s, and environmentalism was the movement
of the 80s (XI). Lasn makes it seem that if only the spell of the corporate image
world were to be broken, the whole pyramid scheme of consumer society would
collapse. Cool, which Lasn holds to be the essential commodity produced by the
culture and advertising industry, would be liberated and reclaimed in a bottom-up
manner:
For hundreds of years citizens have sung the songs, told the stories and created our
culture from the bottom up. Now we are in a situation where more and more of our culture is being sent to us top-down from corporations, ad agencies and broadcasters.
(quoted in SustainAbility)
While this emphasis springs from a valid concern with corporate hegemony over cultural life in contemporary society, I argue that the orientation represented by Lasn
and Adbusters magazine within cultural activism is insufficient in stimulating effective social change.
Departing from a critique of Lasns position, I propose that cultural activism would
beand in various successful tactics, already ismuch more productive when
grounded in concrete struggles carried out by organized, visible subjects against a
specific target rather than in a fragmented manner and against amorphous targets
such as the consumer society. Cultural activism works best as an integral part of a
coherent whole, that is a mass social movement, and not as a substitution for it.
The culture jamming tactic within cultural activism is an activist communication
strategy that has unique qualities allowing it to claim advantages over some of the
other activist communication strategies that involve the use of mainstream media, or
even the creation of alternative media. These same qualities, however, also carry certain risks, such as the tendency to be locked into a narrow-angled reflexive critique
of a limited phenomenon (such as a single corporation), losing sight of the larger systematic problem (capitalism) and the project to overcome it. I will argue that, in such
cases, adbusting fails to be the reincarnation of detournement as it was historically
conceptualized by the Situationists. The Situationists realized the inadequacy of
reflexive alteration of a cultural object with the intent to mock it in their critique of
the parodistic method:
Such parodistic methods have often been used to obtain comical effects. But such
humor is the result of contradictions within a condition whose existence is taken for
granted [. . .]. It is thus necessary to envisage a parodic-serious stage where the accumulation of detourned elements, far from aiming to arouse indignation or laughter by alluding
to some original work, will express our indifference toward a meaningless and forgotten original,
and concern itself with rendering a certain sublimity. (Debord and Wolman)
The Situationists believed that the re-use of old cultural elements in a revolutionary
direction could only be achieved by orienting them toward a new sublime rather than
referring back to their original significationsthe more distanced the new composition from the old, the better. When this principle is not observed, culture jamming produces, or at least reinforces political cynicism in the sense articulated by Slavoj
Zizek, which will be discussed soon, rather than producing transformatory social
action. It introduces humor and indignation to a condition which remains taken for
granted.
Orienting cultural activism toward positive, autonomous actions of communities in
struggle can offer a solution to this political cynicism. This can be achieved, for example, in anti-corporate struggles by acting on the basis of an active subjectivity of a
class of exploited producers, even when using passive tactics of conscious consumption such as the boycott. Before further problematizing culture jamming, however, it
is necessary to appreciate its merits as a strategy created in response to the limitations that mainstream media poses to radical cultural activism.
Media Trouble
Like any other commercial enterprise, commercial media are in the business of selling commodities to buyers. In the case of, say, television channels, contrary to what
we may think at first, the watchers are the commodity, and advertisers are the buyers. The TV channel is in the business of selling us to the advertisers, which makes
possible the secondary operation of advertisers selling products to us in the market
(Chomsky and Herman 16).
Television may come to us free of charge, but there is no free lunch. Advertisement
exposure is the price we pay; in other words, our attention is a commodity that has
an exchange value. One particularly explicit and offensive example that illustrates
the point is the business model called Pay to Surf. In the era of the dot-com bubble, Pay to Surf e-companies would pay web surfers at the rate of a few dollars a day
in exchange for nothing other than the surfers being continuously exposed to advertisements on their screens. These advertisements were delivered by a special piece
of software called a viewbar, which the surfer had to install.1 The same principle is
implicitly in force for all ad-supported media such as newspapers and commercial
websites, with little variation in accordance with the nature of the particular medium.
Even public space is subject to this invasion, as in the case of municipalities agreeing to sell our attention to advertisers by means of billboards and other street decorations. The proceeds collected by the municipalities are supposedly going toward
improvements to our everyday urban habitat; which is a demonstration of an utterly
alienating economic institution characteristic of capitalism, where in order to (partially) satisfy our needs, we first have to hand over much of our control over our everyday existence to those holding economic power.
The harsh truth behind all ad-supported endeavors is that even before the ideological biases and the spin factor in the content or experience come into effect, the
snippets of information and entertainment delivered to us in a piece of media or
planned space act as traps to connect us to the advertisements. Naturally, the interests of the advertisers, who happen to be precisely those corporations holding significant economic and political power that we wish to challenge, dominate and shape
the media and public space. It would simply be bad business for a television channel
to give airtime to a radical intellectual bashing the free market, and then cut to a JP
Morgan commercial touting its expertise in finance and investment consultancy. You
cant expect a newspaper to run a serious social ecological analysis on the substantial irrationality of capitalist industrial production and, on the next page, detail the
governments new plans to license energy giants to build more coal and nuclear
plants to respond to the rising demands of industry. Dangers of carbon emissions
and global warming will only superficially find place across that ad for a slick 2009
hybrid from Ford.
Even in cases when oppositional viewpoints seem to have obtained some exposure in the media, the experience is likely to serve as a recuperation.2 A dissident
message or cultural representation is often carefully framed, and discursively and
aesthetically packaged by the media so that those who come across it take a fundamentally different message to heart, perhaps experiencing it as another consumption
practice. So, with the convolution of interests in the capitalist media, there is a serious problem of getting the dissident word out through normal channels. What can
be done?
One idea is that, if we cant put in the content, maybe we can put in our own ads.
Lasn is enthusiastically in favor of this strategy. He tries to raise cash to buy airtime
on television, publish ads in newspapers, and rent billboards where the ad will
actually not be a product advertisement but instead an anti-commercial, a dissident message. He mentions that media channels were often unwilling to run these
ads for fear of their other advertisers and sponsors, even though Lasn was willing to
pay for them in full. When Lasn saw that somehow his money was no good for these
media institutions, he also realized that his act was subversive and threatening to
the status quo (19396). The political resistance he came across was the very proof
of it. He therefore advocated exposing these unjust practices and building public
pressure to allow him to run the counter-ads, with some success.
The effectiveness of this tactic, however, is limited by the availability of financial
resources to support such a model of dissemination. The advantages Lasn emphasizes, that is, the advantages to be gained by means of wittiness and by means of
the genuine feel of the anti-ads notwithstanding, cultural activists can never expect
to out-compete the advertising budgets of huge corporations in a buying game. As
Lasn has noticed, the only TV anti-ad campaigns that actually worked were the ones
against tobacco companies in the 60s (125). Lasn claims the significant drop in cigarette consumption as a victory, yet he never ponders why this may have been the
only successful case. A 2001 report by the British Office for National Statistics may
provide a clue. The report reveals striking differences in the prevalence of cigarette
smoking in relation to socio-economic group, with smoking being considerably more
prevalent among those in manual groups [euphemism for lower class] than among
those in non-manual groups [euphemism for upper class]. The numbers show that
cigarette consumption has dropped dramatically for upper class people while remaining largely stable for lower class people since the 70s.
This demonstrates that, regardless of the actual universal hazards of smoking, it
has only been problematized as a health issue by members of the upper classes. It
is no wonder, therefore, that the anti-smoking camp could count on the resources of
a sizable majority of the upper class, and present its (legitimate) moral case on the
grounds of universal public health to fight the powerful yet narrow interests of the
tobacco companies, which constitute only a minority of the upper class. It is clear,
especially in retrospect, that the conflict has played out as an intra-upper class
lifestyle battle, for which expensive television ads constitute a fitting arena. Lasn
demonstrates a complete lack of awareness of class by presenting anti-smoking TV
campaigns as an ideal example to be followed by all progressive campaigns. Lasns
use of the term social activists to describe the anti-smoking campaigners conflates their cross-class constituency with todays social activists struggling against
global capitalism and corporate domination unable to count on any alliance whatsoever from within the ruling class. The success of the anti-tobacco campaigns of the
60s is therefore an exception that proves the rule.
To elaborate further, the working class can, by definition, never fight the bourgeoisie on the basis of our money against their money because money itself is a
form of social alienation where, for every expendable unit workers acquire through
wages, they surrender a larger unit in labor. Trying to buy back one piece of life by selling off another larger piece is a losing game. You cannot conquer alienation by alienated means.
Solidarity is the only reliable currency of the working class in class struggle, collective labor in a non-alienated form being the only resource it can generate in abundance. Toward the end of this paper, I will cite an example to indicate how tactics of
cultural activism such as culture jamming can be used to bolster solidarity in the
struggle for social change. It is no accident that people who speak of the need to
transcend capitalism usually also arrive at the necessity of a revolution, which is, at
its minimum, a replacement of the logic of capitalism itself that cannot be accomplished by a publicity arms-race fueled by money, a practice that is entirely intrinsic
to capitalism. With regard to capitalism, if you beat them at their own game, you
have lost (CrimethInc Workers Collective 159). Besides, if media is to be sponsored, why not create and finance an alternative one instead of lining the pockets of
the media owned by the very cartels we are up against?
The better recourse therefore seems to be to create alternative media, owned and
run by activists, supported not by ads but directly by the communities that this dissident media serves. This is exactly the point of the reader-supported radical journal,
the pirate micro radio, the party newspaper, the Indymedia project. These are tried
and true forms of communication that keep the spirit of resistance alive through thick
and thin, with the bonus of not having to placate hostile boards of directors or owners. Furthermore, the advent of internet culture and the increased accessibility of
tools such as video cameras and cell phones have been a boon to alternative media
everywhere, contributing to the rise of the citizen journalist. Alternative media in its
myriad forms is essential to activism and the means are becoming more and more
democratized.
So why not simply concentrate on improving them? We should, as far as it is possible. The trouble with alternative media is that they have to compete with mainstream media, which is vastly superior in funding, technical expertise, and ubiquity.
This is a more refined variety of the previous problem of trying to utilize existing tools
of the system. Sustaining an alternative media outlet economically and motivationally is an uphill battle where few succeed in gaining a foothold. Even with easier
access to media technologies, providing content is almost as resource-intensive as
ever. The field is full of aborted attempts, discontinued magazines, and projects failing to generate sufficient public interest. It is sometimes a struggle in itself to keep
up-to-date with the plethora of radical papers and websites going in and out of existence. At worst, things can get really alienating when members of the Party find themselves worrying over whether they will be able to fill their monthly quotas of copies of
The Socialist Worker sold.
It is very difficult to go head-on against the version of truth pushed by the multimillion dollar media cartel with a paper financed by union dues and donations, news
fed by volunteers and amateur journalists, and fleshed out by unpaid contributors.
Only the best projects are able to weather these difficulties over significant amounts
of time, and those are few and far between. There is a very real limit to the amount
of non-profit alternative media communities can sustain on their own, which unfortunately even leads to implicit competition among dissident projects for the limited
amounts of money and time at the disposal of these communities.
even though he believed that Alberts charges were real and that it was horrible, he
really didnt want to hear all this, and neither did his family or coworkers, in the same
way that they dont want to hear about the horrors of cancer or earthquakes. The reason is that they dont feel that they can do anything about it. Constantly being
reminded of it only depresses them.
I think this example explains in a straight forward way, the coming about of Zizeks
cynical subject. Learning about injustice is only the first step toward change, and in
the absence of the next step, we invariably fall back on life as usual. If anti-corporate
cultural activism leaves us only at the point of critique, we cynically degenerate to our
former positions and it is back to business as usual. I would now like to discuss how
this dynamic is at work at the practical level.
Consumer Society, Capitalism, and Needs
The desired effect of adbusting and some of the other forms of cultural activism
seems to be to create some sort of permanent boycott. It begins (rightfully) with targeting the worst offenders of global capitalism, such as the oil and fast food multinationals, but the tendency is to expand indefinitely, as the Adbusters campaigns such
as Buy Nothing Day and TV Turn-off Week demonstrate. The enemy is declared to
be consumer society, and consumerism is presented as a lifestyle choice that
should be rejected, kicked like a bad habit. Consumer society is a curious term. It
vaguely reminds one of, but also displaces the old meta-enemy, capitalism. The fight
against consumer society seems to hinge on an endless list of rejections. Behind
this conception of consumer society and the call to reject its seductions, there are
some assumptions that need to be challenged.
The first is that we, as the general population, have actual access to the plethora
of products advertised to us. This is simply not the case for a large section of the
population, especially in developing countries. The Consumer is a figure of relative
affluence, characterized by at least a middle-class outlook. For many, the problem is
not consuming too much, but consuming too little, and this kind of activism doesnt
offer much to them. Anti-consumerism does not resonate strongly enough (or resonates too strongly, depending on the way you look at it) in the average Turkish household, for example, where the 2008 minimum wage is about $360 and the male adult
is likely to be the sole breadwinner. There might surely be some cases of impulsive
purchases of unnecessary goods, but they can hardly be elevated to a general condition. Similarly, the repugnant political propaganda and nausea-inducing commercials
on TV would hardly be missed if we were to ditch the set. But for many, TV is the
cheapest source of entertainment there is, and often one of the few links to the outside world in environments where opportunities for socialization are under the pressure of long workdays and household responsibilities (especially for women laboring
at home).
the pitfalls of selecting such a target and implicitly assuming that consumption is the
core of the capitalist system and the source of all its injustices.
What I want to draw attention to in the rest of my discussion is that all these
features I have criticized come together in the implicit notion of cultural activism as
a kind of permanent boycott. The logic I have traced leads to the conclusion that
dropping out of the consumption game and its associated false gods is the way
to seize power against the system and thus the principle that defines culture jamming as a political movement. In order to illustrate the more empirical difficulties and
contradictions involved in this position of boycotting as struggle, I will transpose
the idea to the level of a single actor seeking to exercise political agency through
conscious intervention in a simple and mundane practice of automatic consumer
behavior.
Consider the example of shopping for a carton of milk at the supermarket in
Istanbul this year. As an adbusting, anti-corporate, conscious activist, I cant go for
the Turkish brand called Mis owned in part by Nestle, (corporatewatch.org has a shopping list of sins for Nestle), and I dont fancy subsidizing moderate Islam by buying
Ulker, the brand of the religious bourgeoisie. I dislike Yrsan because it fired workers
for organizing a union. I have a lingering bad taste associated with the ex-state owned
Sek and the bureaucrats in charge of it because I remember they handed out en
masse to primary school kids free cartons of milk that turned out to have gone bad.
The organic brand looks nice, but it costs an arm and a leg, and one never knows if
the label organic is any justification or merely another marketing gimmick. There
are a few other brands about which I cant come up with something objectionable off
the top of my head (aside from animal cruelty), but I have a feeling they arent that
different because profit-based market economies systematically reward rapaciousness toward workers, consumers, and the environment. All companies must maximize their profits and get away with what they can, lest their competitors outdo them
in the same game. Would it make me a cynical consumer if I just bought one by looking at the expiration date?
Karl Marx insisted that, in capitalist society, we ordinary people are robbed at the
point of production, and he called this exploitation. We are exploited, not at the supermarket, reaching for that commodity, but on the job, producing it. Why not look at how
we can attune our admittedly advanced cultural activism skills to our anti-corporate
struggles where we act not only from a position of consumers trying to stay pure, but
also more importantly, from a position of exploited and oppressed producers? If we
remember to look a little deeper into consumer society and bring out capitalism
into critical light again, we can ground our cultural activism in the positive struggle
to create a new world. This is where we actually have the potential to knock down
barriers of the old world as we go along, rather than trying to step aside hoping it will
pass us by.
I would like to present the case of an ongoing campaign against the Turkish dairy
products company known as Yrsan as an example that brings together elements of
worker, consumer, and cultural activism into a coherent whole. The campaign against
Yrsan started when the workers tried to organize a union, which is their constitutional
right, and the company responded by firing 400 workers. The campaign aims to win
back the workers jobs, their right to a union, and compensation for the injustices.
The Yrsan campaign is carried out under the theme Yrsan Yersen, which contains elements of cultural activism and detournement. Yrsan Yersen is a wordplay
in Turkish and involves an allusion to an unrelated, recently popular marketing campaign that aimed to promote nut consumption. The TV ads that were part of the marketing campaign in question would have celebrities read a long list of hyperbolic
claims about the benefits of nut consumption in a tongue-in-cheek manner, most
notably that it increases sexual potency. After listing the benefits, they would conclude by saying Yerseniz, which carries a double meaning: both If you eat it (the
nuts) and slang If you swallow it (if you believe the exaggerated claims). The
Yrsan Yersen campaign that aims to inform the public about the injustices at
Yrsan therefore appears as a detournement of the nut marketing campaign, that
retains the double meanings of if you eat Yrsan products and if you believe
Yrsan lies (regarding their business practices).
The Yrsan campaign also calls on consumers to boycott Yrsan products through
alternative media channels, at street demonstrations, the campaign website, and
pickets in front of supermarkets. The company is significantly bothered by this, since
supposedly by coincidence, they have started a fresh PR campaign touting their products, hygiene, and ethics in large newspaper ads. The boycott is focused on the specific goal of pressuring the company to revert on their policy of firing workers who
dare to organize.
Recall now the aforementioned milk problem with regard to the struggle of Yrsan
workers. I believe that the only rule to go by when shopping for milk in Istanbul today
is to buy anything but the Yrsan milk. Not because any of the other companies are
more ethical, but because in the context of the ongoing campaign, we have a chance
to effect social change by forcing Yrsan to revert on their policy, and we stand to gain
as the producers, as the working class. Boycotts only work as part of focused campaigns, within a limited time frame, rather than as lifestyle preferences. If another
company benefits a little more in the short term from increased sales due to the boycott of Yrsan, so be it. Competition among various companies in the market is a feature that we can use to our advantage, and success in one case will also send a
message to other companies in the industry. The important thing to consider is not
to reward or punish this or that company because of its ethics in an endless game of
choosing the lesser evils, but to increase our power to affect economic and social
decisions, which for example, unionization can allow.
It must also be mentioned that the example of the Yrsan campaign is favored
here not because of a prioritization of one economic issue over others, but simply
because the activism is grounded in a real struggle where we have a chance to win a
positive outcome rather than only presenting a negative critique. The same principle
of organizing and directing our communication strategies toward specific goals using
the best tools we have at hand can apply to cultural activism in relation to struggles
over the environment, against racism, and sexism as well. Tools such as alternative
media and creative tactics such as detournement and adbusting would be indispensable in those contexts.
Focused Cultural Activism
Another example of a piece of cultural activism grounded in social struggles that
I would like to cite is an anti-poster designed by a culture jamming political art
.
collective called I Mihrak (Internal Element) from Turkey. The work is a mock
poster that sports the warning Rabies is Contracted from Wild Animals under the
howling wolf symbol of The Gray Wolves, the fascist youth of the Nationalist Action
.
Party. The signature at the bottom of the poster reads I Mihrak Health Promotion
Institute. The poster resembles government health care promotion posters, found in
schools and clinics, aiming to educate people about contagious diseases such as
rabies.
The piece is especially significant within the context of the ongoing trials of nationalist suspects of the Dink assassination case. Hrant Dink was an ethnically
Armenian leftist Turkish journalist working on reconciliation between the Turkish and
Armenian peoples who was murdered in January 2007 in front of his newspaper
office by a young nationalist gunman. Dinks recognition of the Armenian Genocide,
coupled with a non-nationalist approach to reconciliation that could not easily be dismissed as Armenian propaganda (which incidentally made him unpopular in
Armenian nationalist circles as well), was too much for some to handle. While one
would expect the murder to be cause for universal condemnation and shame, many
nationalists in Turkey, including political party, police, and military elements who were
in fact complicit in the actual planning of the murder, received it as a heroic act. The
trials of the conspirators of the gunman have turned into a political contest between
such virulent fascists as Fuat Turgut, who is an attorney of the defendants in the
case, and crowds who gather before the courts demanding justice and respect for the
memory of Dink. In one case, Turgut shouted the insult Rabid Armenians at the relatives of Dink attending the trial (Kuduz Ermeni Hakareti), which is what the
.
I Mihrak poster is referring to.
Activism in the form of maintaining visible vigilance before the courts to keep public attention focused on the case and countering the fascist campaign to inscribe the
murderers as selfless heroes of the nation and the victims as malicious villains is
.
This I Mihrak poster reads Rabies is contracted from wild animals.
The imagery is a symbol used by the fascist greywolves. The poster was
produced as a response to an incedent where a fascist lawyer shouted the
insult Rabid Armenians! during court, at relatives of the assassinated
Armenian journalist Dink.
.
vital in the struggle against racism and fascism in Turkey. The I Mihrak poster contributes to this cause by the detournement of a government public health promotion
item, employing the authoritative and benevolent tone of a health warning to take a
jab at fascists who are rabidly attacking the Armenian minority in Turkey.
There are many other examples of cultural activism that reinforce the solidarity of
active subjects working for social causes that activists all over the world can learn
from and be inspired by. Some of these may even fuse communicative acts and direct
action, which further grounds cultural activism in social struggle in a direct manner. I
have tried to argue in this paper that cultural activism should be conceived within the
framework of a dialog with communities in struggle and be focused in its aims and
vision, rather than being fragmented and purely critical. I have reaffirmed the place
that practices of cultural activism such as culture jamming and its tools such as
detournement have in oppositional movements, offer unique advantages as communication strategies. However, by criticizing the general orientation of Adbusters as an
example, I have also drawn attention to some of the pitfalls that must be avoided. I
have argued that we must have a positive vision and must concentrate on community
empowerment to avoid political cynicism, and focus on struggles where we act out of
active subject positions. I have tried to present examples of such practices with
which I am familiar and to articulate their merits in order to inspire others.
If adbusting and detournement are to be our new agit-prop, we must make them
relevant to actual movements and struggles. I disagree with Lasn, who states that,
to him, the agit-prop in the form of adbusting is the movement of the twenty-first century. The critique of capitalism is not adequately captured in the term consumption
society and the capitalist system is not a pyramid scheme that can be made to collapse by refusal alone. Our activism will have to move beyond the creation of a generalized disdain for the ills of society, which is hardly in short supply, and focus on
empowerment for tangible change. Cultural activism should concentrate on moments
of political antagonism where actual differences in outcome are at stake because,
after all, activism should not be for the sake of activism itself.
Works Cited
Albert, Michael. Istanbul Talk For Istanbul
METU Alumni Association. Z Magazine Online.
www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/
16017.
Autonome a.f.r.i.k.a gruppe. Communication
GuerillaTransversality in Everyday Life?
http://www.republicart.net/disc/artsabotage/
afrikagruppe01_en.htm.
Blissett, Luther and Sonja Brunzels. What About
Communication Guerilla? http://www
.lutherblissett.net/archive/373_en.html.
Bugra, Ayse. Devlet-Piyasa Karstlg
nn tesinde:
I htiyalar ve Tketim zerine Yazilar (Beyond
the State-Market Dichotomy: Essays on Human
Needs and Consumption). Istanbul: Iletisim,
2003.
Chomsky, Noam and Edward S Herman.
Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy Of
The Mass Media. New York: Pantheon, 2002.
Notes
1. Cashfiesta.com is an example of the model.
2. The political function of recuperation is one
of an unarming and co-optation. The concept can
be introduced as such: To the extent that the
situationist critique extends and deepens itself,
modern societymerely to minimally
What strikes me is the fact that in our society, art has become something,
which is only related to objects, and not to individuals, or to life.
Michel Foucault 261
1. Art on the barricades
In 1849, when Prussian troops tried to defeat the socialist insurgency in the German
city of Dresden, Mikhail Bakunin made an unexpected proposal to his fellow insurgents. He suggested using paintings of the National Museum and placing them in
front of the barricades. Provoking bourgeois sentiments for the fine arts, according
to Bakunins reckoning, this would forestall the Prussian soldiers from actually
attacking the rebels. For the inhabitants of Dresden, however, this instrumentalist
approach to fine arts went too far. They refused to use the paintings for the barricades. A few days later, the insurrection was defeated. Bakunin and many others
were arrested, others killed, and many more chose to leave the country.
Only 150 years later, the use of art, although not museum art, for acts of resistance
is obviously much more accepted. During the coming-out of global movements at the
protests against the ministerial meetings of the World Trade Organization in Seattle in
1999, a rally was accompanied by giant puppets, symbolizing the supposed leaders of
the world who gather during such meetings. However, while thousands of protestors
engaged in a battle with the police in order to defend the blockades that kept twothirds of the WTO delegates outside the conference center, the rally accompanied by
the giant puppets made a round far away from where these confrontations took place.
When I got a chance to ask people at one of the subsequent summit protests in
Europe why they were using these puppets, I got the following answer: We want our
resistance to be colorful.
It is pointless to ponder about what would have happened if the insurrectionists
of Dresden had used the paintings. What is clear, however, is that art works might
have contributed to the survival of a revolutionary situation. Evaluating the tactical
usefulness of art for activist interventions is precisely what this article wishes to
accomplish. Therefore, I am focusing on activist interventions of the recent past that
take the public space as its reference point for engagement. I will take the experiences of activist art interventions during summit protests over the past ten years as
a starting point to investigate the epistemological premises of the imagery of revolutionary change upon which they are based. In order to trace the genealogy of the
epistemological imagination of revolutionary change, I will consider earlier practices
and movements.
The debate about the use of art for resistance has changed considerably since
the 1960s. The expressive mood of May 68 normalized the use of art for contentious politics. Most of the art interventions, as the example of the giant puppets
makes clear, do not transcend mere expression. As Aristide Zollberg points out, however, historical moments of madness are marked by a collapse of the expressive
with the instrumental. In these moments, the difference between expressive articulation and instrumental action vanishes. These moments of madness, I argue, can
be predicated on two images of revolutionary change: disruption and confrontation.
Contemporary art activists often state the intention to disrupt the normal flow of
things by intervening with art in the public space. Considering the anecdote of
Bakunin and the Dresden insurgents, we may wonder whether this is the only possible purpose of art for resistance. Disruption was certainly not the horizon of the
debates on the barricades. Rather, the Dresden insurgents discussed the use of art
in order to win a confrontation with the enemy. Even though Bakunin was not able to
get his proposal accepted in that moment, the decisiveness with which the insurgents were able to contemplate their matter makes contemporary rebels look like
poor cousins.
This, at first view, disappointing insight, led me to investigate the following questions: What do Western radicals mean when they speak about disruption? How do we
think of the coordination of social relations once we assume that we can disrupt
them? What does this tell us about how to conceive of revolutionary change? And,
how do these epistemological premises change once we think about the use of art in
terms of confrontation? These are the questions I want to explore in this essay. What
I hope to accomplish is to sharpen the debate about the tactical use of art interventions for revolutionary street politics. Ultimately, this contribution is an argument, for
seeing art not as an object but as a social relation that potentially transforms the way
we know and act in the world.
free speech and anti-war movements. One of their protagonists, Abbie Hoffman,
described the Yippie strategy as follows:
Instead of making your own culture, its more effective to hijack the dominant culture and make it mouth your message. Using advertising as a model for radical propaganda, and the TV news as a theater for revolution, they turn the power of commercial
power against itself. (329)
Hoffmans description of the Yippie strategy mirrors the hope of using dominant culture to transport an oppositional message that contributes to the subversion of the
dominant culture. Instead of openly declaring war on the dominant culture and the
values it represents, the Yippies considered it more viable to re-appropriate certain
spaces within this culture in order to inflict little scratches from there. Many movements emerging from the 1960s onward have contributed to an expressive conception of street interventions as changing the cultural grammar. Instead of achieving
instrumental ends, interventions in the public space are directed to confuse and subvert communication.
Disruption as an exemplary gesture
This brings me to a final epistemological premise of disruption as a constitutive
moment of contemporary activist art intervention. This premise has to do with what
McKay calls the preference of gesture (1998: 14). With this term, he refers to an
idea that is clearly present in contemporary activist art interventions: an act in itself
can embody a gesture that points to the future by giving hints about how a better
world would look in practice. Street parties and carnivals against capitalism are
often perceived as an exemplary way of how a life freed from the constraints of capitalism and social hierarchies might look. In a nutshell, exemplary means that
these acts prefigure the better world to come. Wini Breines describes prefigurative
politics as the attempt to create and sustain within the lived practice of the movement, relationships and political forms that prefigured and embodied the desired
society.5
The logic of prefiguration has already been present very strongly in non-violent
direct action movements in the 1970s and 1980s (Epstein). The logic of prefiguration as an exemplary gesture relies clearly on a conflation between means and ends.
Activist art interventions become an end in themselves, because they create, at least
for a moment and in a nutshell, the world in which activists want to live. This means
that activist art has to be based on ethical considerations, which focus on attuning
the means to the desired ends, instead of being based on instrumental considerations, where reaching an end becomes an instrumental consideration. David Graeber
has brilliantly captured this tendency toward ethics as a neglect of strategy when he
states: [t]he motto might be, If you are willing to act like an anarchist now, your longterm vision is pretty much your own business (2002: 72).
therefore results in the collapse of execution and legislation), they risk the danger of
mystifying their own political practice in order to appear as truly inclusive and antiauthoritarian.
3. The epistemological premises of confrontation
At one of the biggest street parties of the Reclaim the Streets network, held nearby
in London in 1996, a huge puppet made its way through the crowd from one end of
the street to the other. Since art objects and creative ways of expression were a
habitual feature of Reclaim the Street parties by then, the authorities might not have
been surprised by this strange procedure. They were surprised, however, when they
saw that after the street party the road had dissolved. In the middle of the road, a
line had been dug in the ground in which sunflowers had been planted. Clearly, the
puppet had just been a screen for other activists equipped with percussion drills and
sunflowers.
This anecdote points to another constitutive moment of contemporary activist art
interventions. The giant puppet was not only an expression in itself, but also a means
to reach a very different end. This end was not to disrupt, but to hit the opponent
where it hurts: the newly constructed street was demolished. This art intervention
thereby serves as a confrontation. My aim is not to subdivide activist art interventions into good and bad practices, but to point out two constitutive moments
disruption and confrontationthat can be present in one and the same activist art
intervention. As one Reclaim the Streets activist has put it, when speaking about the
art monuments erected at the beginning of their movement: These were not just
ephemeral monuments to the end of car culture but also beautiful and effective barricades (Jordan 350). In what follows, I will analyze four crucial epistemological
premises of confrontation as a constitutive moment of activist art: the negation of
representation, instrumental reckoning, an antagonistic conception of the world and,
finally, the pedagogical dialectics.
Confrontation as non-representational politics
On Monday, April 7th, a rather weird photo made the front page of Het Parool, an
Amsterdam-based daily newspaper: two persons dressed in military clothes, with
sunglasses and a pink scarf disguising the rest of their faces, holding a toy gun,
stand in front of a demonstration at one of the major squares of Amsterdam, the
Dam. The headline above the photo says: An army of squatters crosses the city.
The explanation below the photo reads: Squatters heavily armed on the Dam. For
the inattentive reader, this might have raised some unsettling questions: Do we have
to be frightened of an armed insurgency? How many squatters have taken up arms
for fighting their struggle? And why did the authorities not intervene? The last question is answered in the article that accompanies the photo. Upon being asked what
of Microsoft, Bill Gates, in 1998, with cream on their faces have been circulated
around the world. Besides ridiculing and attacking the authority and politics of these
persons, the Biotic Baking Brigade managed to abort quite a few such events,
because the pied persons could not deliver their speeches or had to be cleaned up
first. This shows the instrumentalist approach of activist art practices as something
that must have consequences. The consequence of the pie is not merely a disruptive
crack but a confrontation of power.
A similar effect can be observed when the Clandestine Insurgent Clown Army is
not only applied to confuse, but to use this confusion in order to reach another goal.
The Scottish police, for example, were clearly not prepared for a marching Clown
Army, while securing the road leading to the G8 summit in 2005. When, on their way
to blockade one of these roads, the Clown Army met the first police line, they were
able to just cross this line by continuing to march along past the rather astounded
police officers. This was precisely the reckoning behind this tactic: while looking endlessly stupid, the application of the military marching tactic meant that the clown
army could pass the police line as a compact and determent group. Here we can see
that an important part of the instrumentalist premise of activist art interventions is
the goal of breaking with the existing order. Confusion is not an end in itself, but
becomes a means to confront an opponent.
The instrumentalist approach of art actually has an antecedent with the Dada
movement, which used the literary form in such a way that it was hardly recognizable
as art, for the purpose of abolishing bourgeois society and laying the ground for
totally new social relations. Non-art art was a means to confront and change the
dominant social relations of that time. When we look at the following lines of the
Dadaist manifesto, presented during a soiree in Berlin in 1918, the instrumentalist
approach of Dada becomes clear: To be a Dadaist might sometimes mean being a
businessman or a politician rather than an artist, being an artist only by accident.7
Instrumentalist reckoning is directed toward the goal of a break with the established order. This ambition was clearly marked by Lenins strategic proposal of a total
rupture.8 Lenin opposed the revisionist proposal of gradual reforms with the image of
a complete break with bourgeois democracy and property relations. From this goal,
then, emerges a strategic thinking that advances any means in order to achieve this
rupture. This strategic orientation toward a total rupture with the existing bourgeois
and capitalist order was based on Lenins interpretation of dialectic materialism, and
gives us the possibility of clearly demarcating it from the idea of disruption, which
appears as a rather liberal concept in this light. While an analysis following dialectical materialism arrives at seeing history as a process of revolutions and counterrevolutions where social forces are confronted with each other in order to break the
adversary, liberalism assumes that differing competing social forces in society can
establish a compromise, either through the aggregation of preferences or through
scene from the rooftop of the convention centre, the summit delegates did not look
amused.
However, the pedagogical potential of activist art interventions does not exclude
certain dangers of becoming reified through repetition and therefore unreceptive to a
further learning process. Confrontation needs innovation and must be pushed further
in order to avoid ritualization. Ultimately, ritualization of confrontational moments
means abiding by the logic of disruption. Religio-political spectacles are easily reconcilable with capitalism, as pointed out by Peter Cardogan:
Either confrontation must make the ultimate challenge of successful insurrection or
it must be content with being an essentially religio-political exercise, that is a complex
of incantations and rituals concerned with the elevation of the elect for their own sake,
the complementary mortification of the flesh, and the security and prosperity of the
church, party, or sect. (175)
This, the only consequential continuation of confrontational art interventions is a
revolution.
4. Back to the barricades
The barricades of Dresden in 1949 have served as an excellent starting point for my
investigation of the epistemological premises of activist art interventions. While the
pedagogical character of art interventions based on confrontation was part of the
argument, I want to consider it here in a broader light where these considerations
might bring us. Whereas the preceding pages have evaluated a whole range of
activist art interventions of past years, I am not inclined to depict contemporary
activists as dignified cousins of Bakunin.
The cultural-political movements of the 1960s have introduced a grammar of
protest that champions the expressive, and thereby neglects strategy. The image of
a complete rupture with the existing system was replaced by the image of multiple
cracks. The idea of blowing up the continuum of history was exchanged for a utopian
moment in the here and now. And instrumental reckoning made way for the expressive logic of an exemplary gesture.
At the end of the twentieth century, when summit protesters stated: You make
plans, we make history, it looked as though an unmediated engagement with history
was emerging again. Activist art interventions have contributed in an important way
to making the re-imagination of a social conflict possible. People organized in the
streets to confront an enemy. If (art) activists of this period may conclude one thing,
it is that its difficult to raise the stakes. Choosing disruption as the constitutive
moment for activist art interventions might be the result of confrontational tactics
becoming frozen in too short a time. Creating conflict means constant reinvention
of street tactics. However, this does not take away from the fact that activist art
interventions not only have the potential to make conflict imaginable, but also to
materialize it in the present. In order to do so, activist art interventions had better
base their practices on confrontation as a constitutive moment. As Karl Marx and
Friedrich Engels remarked when describing their conception of communism, it is not
about a state of affairs, and neither about an ideal, to which society will have to
adjust itself, but about a real movement, which abolishes the present state of things
(1976: 49).
Yet, the experience of global movements proves that abolishing the present state
of things requires movements to move beyond confrontation. This raises the question of organizational practices in radical social movements. How art can be used for
street interventions has been discussed in this contribution. How it might be used for
the organization of movements should be scrutinized in another investigation.
I am deeply indebted to A. K. Thompson and Begm zden Firat for their comments
on a first draft of this article, as well as for their continuous activist-intellectual
inspiration.
Works Cited
Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World.
Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984.
Benjamin, Walter. The author as producer.
Cultural Resistance Reader. Ed. Stephen
Duncombe. London: Verso, 2002. 6781
Cadogan, Peter. From civil disobedience to confrontation. Direct action ad democratic politics.
Ed. Robert Benewick and Trevor Smith. London:
Allen and Unwin, 1972. 162177.
Churchill, Ward and Mike Ryan. Pacifism as
pathology: Reflections on the role of armed struggle in North America. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring,
1998.
Day, Richard J. F. Gramsci is Dead: Anarchist
Currents in the Newest Social Movements.
Pluto Press, 2005.
Debord, Guy. Society of the spectacle. Detroit:
Black & Red, 2000.
Deleuze, Gilles and Felix Guattari. A Thousand
Plateaus. New York: Continuum, 2004.
Notes
1. The Situationist International was a culturalpolitical movement that existed from 1957 to
1972. This movement opposed the spectacle
character of capitalist societies by creating
playful situations that intervene in the daily
reproduction of capitalist culture.
2. Reclaim the Streets also inspired the idea of
carnival against capitalism.
3. http://www.clownarmy.org/about/
about.html
4. http://www.rhythmsofresistance.co.uk/
?lid=52
Clowndestine Maneuvers:
A Study of Clownfrontational
Tactics
L. M. Bogad
calendrically nor spatially circumscribed or permitted by the state, but declared and
embodied by a movement that identifies itself as global, anti-corporate, and antiauthoritarian.
I posit that the goals of tactical carnival are:
to declare and occupy a joyous, participatory and semi-anonymous, relatively
safe place for power inversions/subversions. Celebrity has been explicitly
denounced in some movement literature in favor of the relative anonymity of
the mass. These spaces are also meant to be non-dogmatic/sectarian, a more
open place for wider participation. The hope is that more people will join the
movement when a space for this kind of joyful participation is opened up.
to put a friendly face on the movement as a way to interrupt what I refer to as
the hegemonologue of the corporate media and state rhetoric, which often
demonizes other activists as crazed, nihilistic hooligans. The idea is to insert
images that at least partially disrupt or disharmonize the barrage of negative
images (for example, a clown kissing a riot shield juxtaposed with the usual
images of street melee and property damage), and to replace the usual story
of the battle (street fights, vandalism, etc.) with the battle of the story in
which colorful and creative costumes, dance, music, performance, and
improvised interactions give a new look to the movement and its agenda
(Interview with D. Solnit). These events also attempt to interrupt another aspect
of the hegemonologue, which is that of the rhetoric of inevitability of corporate
globalization, by demonstrating that better alternatives are possible.
to key an experimental mode in which new ways to play with and around power
can be tested. The idea is to develop less obvious and predictable ways to
interact on the street with agents of the state, corporations, and passersby.
Much of the creativity is intended to have the effect of dispelling fear and
tension during confrontations with massive police presence, for example.
to create an celebratory culture of active defiance as an alternative to the
everyday life experience of many peoplein response to a widespread
frustration that many participants feelregarding their official relegation to
the role of consumers of culture and spectacle rather than creators/spectactors
(Boal).
I examine this global phenomenon through a local particular: the G8 protest in July
2005, with a further focus on the Carnival for Full Enjoyment in Edinburgh on July 4
as participated in by the Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army (CIRCA: www
.clownarmy.org). I will draw on press clippings, videos, interviews with CIRCA members, movement literature, and my own experience as a participant/observer to
examine how CIRCA theorized and actualized its own participation in the tactical carnival around the G8 in July 2005.
180 | L. M. Bogad
One of the main rules of improvisational theatre is the idea of yes, and; one
never negates a performing partners idea or proposition, but rather agrees and adds
a new creative thought to the mix. The rebel clowns jump about, following each other
in an agreeable yes, and ethos of improvisational frolicking in front of the police
line. They simply refuse to acknowledge the very clear and stark NO of the disciplined, uniformed, and armed police line, asserting their own ridiculous and enthusiastic YES, AND over and over with each moment. Finally one intrepid trickster, aptly
named Trixie, kisses one of the police shields. Her kiss is so enthusiastic and vigorous that she smears her clown makeup and lipstick all over the shield. She then
goes from shield to shield, all the way up the phalanx line, kissing and leaving her
smeary mark on each one as she goes. The police stay in formation, some disturbed,
some impassive, and some amused and surprised by this paradigm-shifting kiss.
One says Step away from the shield please, while another can clearly be seen to
be smiling.
Trixie needs to re-apply her lipstick in order to continue her loving assault, and
while doing this she is asked by Zoe, a CIRCA videographer, why she is doing what
shes doing. In a high pitched voice she earnestly says, Because I love them! I love
the police! Theyre our friends. She then runs off to kiss more shields.
Trixie then begins drawing smiley-faces with her lipstick and saying Yay! Soon
she is writing Yay! on some of the riot shields, while the other clowns cheer and
clap. The images of her kisses and incongruous lipstick happy faces are broadcast
and printed all over the world the next day. There is a marked gender element to
this interactionthe male clowns arent kissing any shields, but they are scrubbing
away solicitously, saying things such as, Oh, its a mess, its very baddont worry!
Ill clean it, you wont get in any trouble!
Soon the rebel clowns form a line facing the police, and begin doing a motion/
sound all together: bending at the hip, arms and hands extended, and going Shhhhh,
then standing back up while making a Whooo sound. Their relentless group improv
had led them to an ambivalent, absurd gesture; the clowns were simultaneously
kowtowing to the police and shooing them away. After five or six repetitions of this
movement, the clowns began jumping up and down, yelling Yippie! At that precise
moment, the police line broke. First one, then two, then the entire squad pulled away,
formed two files, and began jogging down the road in double time. The clowns ran
along with them briefly, and a great cheer rose from the mass of non-clown protesters and bystanders, who followed the police for a few yards and then began to celebrate in the street.
It is probably prudent at this point to note that, in fact, the police line may not have
been broken by clown magic. One can imagine the rear-rank conversation between
the officers of the unit, or by walkie talkie to headquarters: Look, weve become
sucked into some kind of performance art here, and wed really like to go elsewhere so
182 | L. M. Bogad
we can fight crime . . . wel, look, to be fair, our training doesnt include improv theatre . . .
requesting permission to withdraw. However, the constant improvisation of the
clowns made such a poetic moment, where it appeared that clowns could dispel the
intimidating power of the state through fearless silliness and serious play, possible.
As one clown said, They loved us so much, we asked them to go away, and they did.
This was not street theatre, per se, but a form of improvisational and creative direct
action.2 The clowns immediately began to fill the authoritarian gap created by the
policemens withdrawalpower abhors a vacuum, after allby directing traffic,
including police wagons, with their feather dusters and giving passing vehicles the
CIRCA Clown Salute (which, according to CIRCA regulations, is thumbing ones nose
with a big smile on ones face). For the most part, however, they continued playing
games as they had been before the police arrived to demarcate the space.
This absurd face-off between two groups of masked, uniformed performers
occurred during the Carnival for Full Enjoyment of July 4, 2005. This carnival was
not a state-sanctioned cultural steam-valve occurring within universally recognized
temporal bounds based on the agrarian calendar. Rather, it was declared by members
of the global justice movement as a festive and defiant event. While it was, in part, a
response to the G8 summit being held a few miles away at Gleneagles, it was
not purely negative and reactive in character, but an attempt to open a space for
antiauthoritarian, egalitarian, and participatory celebration without state permits or
sanction. With slogans such as No Wage Slavery, No Benefits Slavery, No Army
Slavery, and No Debt Slavery, the Carnival for Full Enjoyment issued a press
release calling for workers to Phone in Sick and Join the Carnival:
Flex, temp, full-time, part-time, casual and contortionist workers, migrants, students, benefit claimers, New Dealers, work refusers, pensioners, dreamers, duckers &
divers [. . .]. Bring drums, music, banners, imagination for action against the G8 that
expresses our resistance in work, out of work and wherever we live. Assert our desires
for FULL ENJOYMENT with fun in the cityand begin to make capitalism & wage slavery
history . . . On 4 July we can take action and experienceif only temporarilywhat life could be like
if we got the bosses off our backs
. . . Get together with friends and set your sights. Bring what youd want to find, and most of all
bring imagination and passion. Diversity and creativity is our strength . . .
. . . We are in favour of direct action because marching around with placards can be safely
ignored by those who control exploitation. We advocate direct action against the institutions
which exploit the majority [. . .]. We invite workers from Standard Life and all other
corporations to join the Carnival. Take an extended lunch-break, phone in sick! Join
us in opposing casualisation, the intensification of work, attacks on pensions and
conditions . . .
The carnival is a celebration of how good life can be, and at the same time a statement against
those who spoil it for the majority. (Carnival for Full Enjoyment, authors emphasis)
The organizers of the Carnival explicitly presented it as an anti-capitalist, antiauthoritarian event with links between local workers and activists and a larger global
movement. The Carnival was to be both a rejection of state authority (very significantly, no permit was requested for this event), an affirmation of the joy of solidarity
and resistance (particularly resistance to the regulation of everyday behavior in
increasingly-privatized and controlled public space), and an alternative to what was
seen as the more staid tactic of marching around with placards.
It was also seen, both by some protesters and the authorities, as a possible
opportunity for direct action to disrupt the proceedings of corporations and business as usual in the city. A massive police force was concentrated in Edinburgh to
protect banks and other corporate offices from vandalism or nonviolent disruption
such as sit-ins, and to prevent the reveling, disorderly crowds from blocking commercial traffic on the streets. The government brought 10,000 police to Edinburgh from
all over the UK to respond to this threat to security and public order. Police from
London, Manchester, and many other cities filled the streets, blocking intersections,
surrounding, searching, arresting, chasing and breaking up large groups of protestors, and keeping them separate. There was a great deal of game playing, samba
bands, festive costumes, dancing, and revelry in the street, and even a huge anarchist black cat-puppet; however, there was also plenty of fleeing, regrouping, cat-andmouse and, on one street, even violent confrontation between protestors and police.
This was not exactly a carnival in the Bakhtinian sense, where the laughter is ideologically ambivalent, where all participate, and where the event is demarcated and
approved of by the authorities even though there is always the risk that the licensed
fools may go too far. Nevertheless, the movements that organize such events are, to
some degree, influenced by the ideas and writings of Bakhtin and Rabelais (especially in Western countries), and they have theorized such oppositional carnivals as
an important tactic in the struggle against corporate globalization.
Carnival has been repeatedly invoked by this movement for many of its actions,
even if Bakhtin would not recognize these events as Rabelasian. On June 18, 1999,
the opening day of the G8 summit in Koln, Germany, a Carnival Against Capital was
declared by the global justice movement as an international day of action, protest
and carnival aimed at the heart of the global economy (Ainger 33). This proposal
identified capitalism as the root of our social and ecological problems, and was
taken up by the Peoples Global Action network, translated into seven languages,
and distributed by email and post to thousands of groups worldwide (Notes From
Nowhere 184). On that day, in the financial district of London, 10,000 people gathered in the street, playing Volleyball with inflatable globes and danc[ing] to samba
rhythms in the spray of a waterspout from a damaged fire hydrant. In order to avoid
being penned in by the police, to keep movement fluid, and to add a colorful flair to
the event, organizers gave participants color coded masks (red, yellow, blue, etc.) to
184 | L. M. Bogad
wear; a note inside the masks suggested that the wearers follow the flags that
matched their masks when the time came. Sure enough, at one moment, colorful
flags went up and soon streams of masked revelers were running, following the flag
bearers on zigzagging routes through the narrow streets of the City of London. Of
course, this event had not been permitted by the state, and the anti-capitalist and
anti-authoritarian ideology of the gathering asserted itself through direct action as
the day progressed:
. . . by the end of the day a group of the protesters had invaded and trashed the
ground floor of the London International Financial Futures Exchange, three McDonalds
had their windows broken, two people had been run over by police vans, and riot police
were charging in. The sight of anarchy hitting the worlds largest financial center
prompted newspaper headlines that denounced the protesters as evil savages, an
ignorant unwashed horde hell-bent on turning a carnival into a riot . . . the carnival
goers in Londonthe majority of whom had been nonviolent in actions and intent
were members of a far larger, invisible but international constituency organizing around
a common enemy: globalization. (Ainger 33)
This Carnival Against Capital was hardly limited to London. Simultaneous protests of
a similar nature took place against global capitalism, the international financial system, and corporate power . . . in 43 countries around the world (Ainger 33). For
example, in Nigeria, a Carnival of the Oppressed brought
nearly 10,000 Ogoni, Ijaw, and other tribes together in closing down the countrys oil
capital, Port Harcourt . . . meanwhile in Koln, the Intercontinental Caravan, made up of
400 Indian farmers and other activists from the global South, plan[ned] to conclude its
tour with a Laugh Parade but police detain[ed] 250 of them before they [got] the
chance to guffaw at the G8. (Notes From Nowhere 1857)
In fact, this global event was so disturbing that the FBI listed Carnival Against
Capital as a terrorist group to be watched in its memo of May 11, 2001, four months
before the Al Qaeda attacks of September 11 of that year (FBI). This is ironic in that
Carnival Against Capital was not an organization but rather a concept, a call to
action, an invocation of the idea of the subversive and celebratory carnivalesque
that resonated around the world for the global justice movement.
There are many other examples of the movements invocation of the idea of carnival for its actions. The anti-World Trade Organization protests that shut down the
city of Seattle in 1999 were also conceived, in part, as carnivalesque, with colorful
costumes, giant puppets, dancers and marching bands, and people dressed as sea
turtles and butterflies, playing and interacting with more conventional union members and other activists. The protest against the Free Trade Area of the Americas
(FTAA) conference in Quebec in 2001 was also dubbed a Carnival Against Capital.
There is a neckerchief, sewn by Argentinean women textile workers who took over
their own factory during the financial/economic collapse in that country, that is worn
by many movement activists, including members of CIRCA. The neckerchief, produced in red, yellow, pink, and orange, has a smiling face printed on one side: one
can wear it so that the mass-produced smile covers the lower half of ones face. On
the other side, a pattern of a chain-link fence covers an unhappy face, so the wearer
has the choice of looking free and happy or fenced-in and sad. One can imagine a
mass of people, filling up a public space, dancing or playing games and making
music, while wearing these masks. The effect might be ideologically unclear,
yet eerie. On the edges of the neckerchief, in English, Spanish, German, and French,
is a passage that explicitly states what Carnival means for the global justice
movement:
We will remain faceless because we refuse the spectacle of celebrity, because we
are everyone, because the carnival beckons, because the world is upside down,
because we are everywhere. By wearing masks we show that who we are is not as
important as what we want, and what we want is everything for everyone. (We will)
This passage shows some of the key ideas that the global justice movement
embraces from its creative interpretation of the carnivalesque. The idea of anonymity
is advantageous for concealing identity from the authorities, but also as a way to celebrate the undifferentiated mass and combat the worship of individual celebrity/cult
of personality by the mass media and pop culture. This reflects the Bakhtinian
distinction between the carnivalesque mass of undifferentiated bodies, versus the discrete, separate, and closed-off bourgeois individual body uplifted by mercantilism and
capitalism. The demand for everything for everyone echoes the millenarian, utopian
poetics of the Rabelasian carnival, also expressed in the hidden transcripts of the
oppressed of many peasant cultures (Scott 1990) and the rhetoric of the Diggers
(Hill).3 The carnival beckons this movement to action of a celebratory kind.
Many groups have formed with the goal of contributing art, festive costumes, and
music to these carnivals of resistance. One group explains its savvy theorization of
itself right in its name: Tactical Frivolity. Musical bands are a crucial aspect of these
gatherings; one such group playfully named itself Reclaim the Beats, after the seminal
movement group, Reclaim the Streets. The choice of music varies, but there is a great
deal of influence from the carnivals of the Brazilian and Caribbean communities, showing that tactical carnival is not only motivated by a reference to medieval European traditions. While the Seattle-based Infernal Noise Brigade (www.infernalnoise.org) plays
a post-modern blend including elements of drumline, taiko, Mughal and North African
rhythms, elements of Balkan fanfares, breakbeats, and just about anything else
(Infernal Noise Brigade) and dresses in an almost paramilitary uniform, the UK-based
Rhythms of Resistance, who were an important part of the shutdown of the IMF/World
Bank meeting in Prague in September 2000, says about itself:
Whilst people often refer to us as a Samba Band we actually have more affinity with
the Afro Bloc parading drum bands that emerged in the mid 70s in Salvadore, Bahia in
186 | L. M. Bogad
Brazil. Bands such as Ile Aye and Olodum formed as a political expression of black
awareness, resisting economic exclusion. Coming out of some of the poorest urban communities, Afro blocs became a mobilising focus on picket lines and marches [. . .].
As they put it, they played as a force of resistance and source of self confidence.
The growth of Schools of Samba both in Brazil and all over the world since the 80s, is
largely a result of the commercialisation of this culture of resistance . . .
. . . with bands forming in across Europe and beyond (at least 2 in the US), an international network of percussive resistance to the march of capitalism is now emerging.
Street carnival is the vital component of protest and life and funuse your imaginations, connect and network, build instruments and costumes, learn our tunes and
distribute them noisily through the world!! (Rhythms of Resistance website, authors
emphasis)
Rhythms of Resistance exemplifies the anticapitalist movements awareness of
and perhaps not-unproblematic appropriation/exchange of oppositional culture and
tactics across borders of nationality, race, class, and privilege. Just as power and
commerce are circulating around the world at an accelerated rate in the era of globalization, so are traditions and innovations in cultures of resistance. The same internet technology that enabled the global movement to coordinate the Carnival Against
Capital in 43 different countries around the world also enables such an exchange.
It is clear that Rhythms of Resistance, which has inspired many such groups for
protests in other countries, has embraced the idea of carnival as a positive and
uplifting mode of defiance and advocacy. They also perform their music at protests in
order to foster group confidence and defiant joy, and simply to help make the
protest a good time for all who join in.
Why is carnival such an important referent for this movement of movements?
Carnival, as conceived of by Bakhtin, does have an edge. It suggests a possibility of
riot or rebellion, that the licensed foolery might get out of hand and turn into outright
revolt; this may appeal to some movement groups. However, more importantly, some
modern anarchists are particularly drawn to the idea of carnival because it appeals
to their egalitarian ideology and participatory, Do-It-Yourself (DIY) ethos. Bakhtins
all-too-familiar statement that carnival knows no footlights is eagerly echoed in
the text on the above-quoted neckerchief, and in the key movement text We Are
Everywhere: The Irresistible Rise of Global Anticapitalism. In that book, in the
Carnival section, under the subheading of Participate, Dont Spectate, the famous
Bakhtin passage about footlights is quoted in full, followed by:
Passivity disappears when carnival comes to town, with its unyielding demand for
participation . . . It is a moment when we can break free from the alienation that capitalism enforces in so many ways . . . Carnival denies the existence of experts, or rather,
insists that everyone is one . . . it demands interaction and flexibility, face-to-face contact
and collective decision-making, so that a dynamic and direct democracy developsa
democracy which takes place on the stage of spontaneously unfolding life, not raised
above the audience but at ground level, where everyone can be involved. There are no
leaders, no spectators, no sidelines, only an entanglement of many players who do
their own thing while feeling part of a greater whole. (Notes From Nowhere 1778)
This perhaps idealistic desire that, in carnival, the mass is involved actively and that
no one is relegated to the role of passive spectator/consumer, particularly appeals
to a movement that views the mainstream news and entertainment media with great
skepticism, that is influenced by Guy Debords concept of the deadening, pacifying,
and self-perpetuating society of the spectacle, and that advocates and practices a
participatory, do-it-yourself form of political direct action and communication (for
example, though zines and Indymedia). Many members of the movement, while not
explicitly anarchist, embrace the term coined by the movement in Argentina: horizontalist. This egalitarian idea of horizontality calls for a minimization of the concentration of power in any single person or groups hands, and Bakhtins idea of the
carnival, which has been critiqued by scholars, nevertheless appeals strongly to such
ideological desires and agendas. To distinguish tactical carnivals from the carnivals
that occur in Rio de Janeiro or Notting Hill, members of the anticapitalist Notes From
Nowhere collective wrote:
What carnivals remain in most parts of the world have themselves become
spectaclesspecialist performances watched by spectatorswith police lines and
barriers placed between the parade and audience. Thus the vortexed, whirling, uncontrollable state of creative chaos is shoe-horned into neat straight lines and rectangles.
A visit to many contemporary carnivals sanctioned by the state (such as Carnaval in Rio
de Janeiro, or the Notting Hill Carnival in London), where consumption and corporate
sponsorship has taken over from the creativity and spontaneity is enough to illustrate
how carnival under capitalism has lost its vitality. But carnival has been with us since
time immemorial and it has always refused to die. Reappearing in different guises
across the ages it returns again and again. Freed from the clutches of entertainment,
the anticapitalist movements have thrown it back into the streets, where it is liberated
from commerce for everyone to enjoy once again. (177)
This passage reveals the importance of the concept of carnival to some social movement activists, and how it has motivated the way they organize and perform in public
space in critical contrast with (the activists perception of) events such as Rios
Carnaval.
However, this form of carnival is also different from the form described and idealized by Bakhtin. It is not a yearly event that fits into an agrarian calendar and a
Christian/feudal worldview and system of power; it happens when and where the
movement calls for it, though often as a reaction to corporate/state events such as
the meetings of the Group of 8 (G8) or the World Trade Organization (WTO). Far from
being a day of licensed foolery and excess, it is often unpermitted by the state,
188 | L. M. Bogad
triggering police repression. Tactical carnival comes from a complex, global coalition
of social movements, and therefore defies ideological generalization. However, its
laughter, while ambivalent and self-mocking at times, is not as ambivalent as that
described by Bakhtin. It is joyful, but it is also satirical laughter, often coupled with
a political worldview or critique, and therefore perhaps not quite as universal
as Bakhtins. It espouses not just the World-Turned-Upside Down concept often
described by scholars of medieval European carnival, but rather the very different
slogan Another World Is Possible. The difference between these two phrases is the
difference between a temporary inversion of power relations and an assertion of the
possibility of, and advocacy for the struggle toward lasting and substantial progressive social change. This slogan, Another World Is Possible, has been used in several languages on movement proclamations and banners around the world.
This form of protest, invoking the carnivalesque, has not been used only to
oppose capitalism. As Padraic Kenney discusses in his book A Carnival Of Revolution,
the grassroots, independent groups in Eastern Europe that undermined authoritarian Communist power using absurdist, carnivalesque mass protests were a key,
under sung element in the collapse of Soviet power in many of the Warsaw Pact
countries.
Part of this tactical carnival model is a response to more conventional and institutionalized models of social movement protest. The goal here is to open up public
space, with do-it-yourself, group and individual creativity, rather than merely to occupy
it with uniform marching and chanting while holding mass-produced signs. This opening of public space for a freer and more festive kind of protest and direct action is
one of the main goals of CIRCA.
CIRCA: The Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army
CIRCA was formed in London in fall 2003. It declared itself to be an army of rebel
clowns that had mustered its forces to storm the Palace during President George W.
Bushs state visit to the UK. CIRCA had been delighted that, after hundreds of years
of having no fools or jesters in the court, the Queen was finally opening her doors for
a fool to come . . . but CIRCA was soon dismayed to hear that it was the wrong kind
of fool whom Her Majesty had invited. CIRCA was seen all over the city, firing pink
pretzels out of its clown cannon at the Esso building, marching behind Beefeaters,
sneaking though the park in bright pink and lime green fuzzy outfits while holding
single leaves in front of them for camouflage (and holding the leaves above their
heads in response to police helicopters flying over). Since that time, CIRCA has been
seen occupying the city of Leeds, marching on the Greet the Buyers meeting in
London between corporations and the US-installed interim regime in Iraq, attempting
to attend the Republican National Clown Convention in New York as members of
the Big Top Delegation, and elsewhere. CIRCA uses a horizontalist organizing model
190 | L. M. Bogad
As CIRCA members Isabelle Fremeaux and Hilary Ramsden describe in their essay
We Disobey to Love: Rebel Clowning for Social Change, CIRCA training sessions
aim to guide participants toward discovering and developing their own clown persona, learning to work together in groups without leaders, and joining freely and fearlessly in improvisation under pressure. Finding ones clown involves coming up with
a name, a sensibility, a physicality and a costume and makeup style. But it is also a
much longer and deeper process that involves a great deal of thoughtful/playful
exploration. Putting on the makeup before an action is a crucial part of the transformation, the re-entry into ones alternate clown persona. This celebration of individual
creativity and identity through the development of ones own clown can hopefully
enable CIRCA members to express themselves in the moment and mode of carnival
while still feeling part of a larger group-identity.
CIRCA hopes to open up the spaces that they move in, to shift the paradigm or
change the rules of behavior and engagement. They hope to bring the tactical carnival with them as they go, switching an event into the key of clown though absurdist
cues and gestures. The spirit of playfulness can often be infectious, and civilians
may be brought into the improvised games in the street, e.g., several dozen clowns
coming across a speed bump and treating it as a nigh-unsurpassable obstacle that
can only be climbed over through a great deal of teamwork and slapstick. Like police
visors and shields, the face makeup and costumes of a mass of rebel clowns evokes
a range of responses. However, it is the openness, willing vulnerability, and fearlessness of the clowns that CIRCA hopes will prove infectious in the carnival spaces they
create and bring with them as they navigate the city. As the clowns greet the police
as friends and fail to either melt away in fear or raise the tension in anger, a shift
in the paradigm and pattern of confrontation ensues.4
CIRCA follows the egalitarian spirit of horizontalism and tactical carnival in its
organizing model. While as many as 150 clowns were in Edinburgh at one time (and
the sight of that many rebel clowns marching was a bizarre and mind-opening vision
in itself), CIRCA is divided into gaggles of roughly 1015 clowns, analogous to
the affinity group model of the direct action movement. In groups of this size, members are working with people they can personally get to know and trust. They can
develop models of group decision-making where every voice can be heard. When
larger groups of clowns need to gather, they form a Clown Council where chosen
spokesclowns (!) speak for and in constant consultation with their own gaggles. This
basically follows the horizontalist model of organization, but with makeup and red
noses added.
There was a varied attitude toward the concept of carnival among the CIRCA
activists. At some group meetings, Matthew Trevelyan read quotes directly from
Rabelais Gargantua that he found particularly inspiring and relevant to our carnivalesque efforts. On the other hand, Jennifer Verson refused to accept the term
192 | L. M. Bogad
COMMUNIQUE #8.86
CLANDESTINE INSURGENT REBEL CLOWN ARMY (CIRCA)
Re: Operation BROWN-NOSE
To all our rebel friends in the global justice movementour brave, beautiful, beatific,
bracelet-wearing brethren bent on beating back and baffling the behemoth of Babel
that is the Gathering of Eight . . .
We are so proud of you, so in love with you . . . we share your compassion and desire
to TRULY make poverty history. We admire your realization that the only real way to
end poverty, in the global South or in the suburbs of Edinburgh, is to stop the Great
Eights amusingly antisocial habitstheir rather nasty slapstick routineskicking
the poorer nations with war, arms sales, and bullying trade policies, manipulating
their markets and plundering their resources while dangling the crumbs of debt
forgiveness. We know the G8, far from being thanked for forgiving these illegitimate debts, should beg forgiveness from the Global South for their ongoing crimes and
depredations. . . .
Beyond all that, we of CIRCA thank YOU, our friends here at this march, for being
part of a beautiful and loving nonviolent social movement to achieve true justice . . . for
of course it is only through social movements that real social change can happennot
from begging the politicians or corporations to behave more nicely.
BUT . . . the CIRCA Advanced Intelligence Team has discovered a grave threat to our powerful movement, just as we are all gaining momentum and making our demands for
profound change heard. It has come to our attention through deft infiltration, clever
clandestinity, and watching the telly that SEVERAL CRIMINAL, ANTISOCIAL ELEMENTS
are trying to HIJACK and CO-OPT our MOVEMENT! They are HERE, AMONGST US, these
DANGEROUS EXTREMISTS, and they MAY even be marching in this very demonstration!!! They are GORDON BROWN (MP), the financier of the invasion of Iraq, whose 5 billion War Reserve Fund could, instead, fully immunize EVERY CHILD in the developing
world for two years, who has stated explicitly that aid will go down as much as debt is
relieved for a net change of ZERO, and that recipient countries will have to restructure
their societies to make them even more vulnerable to the market. HILLARY BENN (MP)
may also be present, wearing his pretty development mask over his true face of privatization and plunder. BEWARE! If you see Brown or any of his Errorist henchmen,
please report them to the clown patrol nearest to you on the march, and keep your
distance.
CIRCA has mobilized to PATROL and PROTECT our movement, so that it is not
HIJACKED by these ghoulish buffoons. Our movements unique accomplishment is the
creation of a grassroots politics WITHOUT professional politicians and parliaments (as
they have said in Bolivia, Argentina, Ecuador, Chiapas, and beyond, Que se vayan
todos! (Out with them all!) We must not let these brown-nosing interlopers mislead us
on our own march!
Operation BROWN-NOSE will involve giving hugs to the needy, playing games with all
our friends, and other similarly militant activities. We request full cooperation from the
public for this operation.
With love, laughter and red-nosed resistance,
Colonel Oftruth
General Confusion
Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army
The actual press conference involved feeding organic chips to the media (when most
of them balked, Colonel Oftruth was sure to hand-feed them until they all relented)
and a demonstration of CIRCAs parade skills as an entire battalion marched directly
into (and behind, and on top of) a tiny phone booth. CIRCA then demonstrated its
fishing movement, explained the premise of Operation HAHAHAA (Helping Authorities
House Arrest Half Witted Authoritarian Androids), in which CIRCA planned to help the
security forces with their ongoing house arrest of the G8 leadersthe ultimate dangerous, antisocial, criminal elements in the Gleneagles resort. CIRCA then read the
Operation Brown-Nose communiqu and scattered in all directions. The next day, several papers, including the Daily Record, the Daily Express, and the Daily Star, quoted
at varying length the second paragraph of the communiqu, which enunciated a critique of the G8s actual policies and responsibility for the debt of the Global South,
along with the disarming CIRCA claim that they would amuse, bemuse, but never
bruise.
Press coverage of CIRCA thus served as a partial disruption of the hegemonologue
that relentlessly depicted protesters as violent and dangerous. Even in right-wing
newspapers that were hostile to the movements agenda, quotes and photographs of
CIRCA members provided a sort of cognitive dissonance to the reactionary storyline.
On one such page of the Daily Mirror, under the huge headline RIOT POLICE . . . 1
ANARCHISTS . . . 0: G-Hate Aggro Kicks-off as Cops Crush Violent Protesters, and
next to a photograph of a beaten protestor, is the image of Trixie kissing the shield of
a smiling policeman, with the subtitle KISS AND MAKEUP: Member of the Rebel
Clowns plants smacker on cop riot shield. The Daily Mail also showed a picture of
Trixies kiss next to a photograph of a female protestor being arrested by heavily
armored police (Moore, Madeley). These images may at least have disrupted the constant barrage of dehumanizing rhetoric about the protestors, if only from the jarring
juxtaposition of the visuals above the denunciatory text. A reader might have wondered, if only for a split second: if these protesters appeared to just be clowning
around and kissing shields, why were they being beaten and arrested? In The
Carnival Turns Into Anarchy in the Scotsman, a reporter noted:
Earlier in the day, and on a lighter note, the Rebel Clown Army had been detained while
putting on their make up and red noses. Police found an artillery of weapons including
a feather duster, water pistols and soapy bubbles. About 30 of the clownswho wore
194 | L. M. Bogad
an unusual combination of army combats, neon pink wigs, colanders on their heads
and other fluffy accessorieswere surrounded by police in Teviot Place. Some clowns
ran away giggling but others were forced to wait while they were searched by police. All
the clowns insisted on speaking in high-pitched voices, dancing around and making
jokes . . . (Brown)
Despite the very real clashes between police and citizens during the Carnival, this
sort of press coverage undermined to some degree the rhetoric of the national security state about the threat of violent protestors.
By the end of the campaign, there were some small signs of fraternization
between some rank-and-file police and some of the clowns, an exchange, a lessening
of mutual fear through the visors and the makeup that covered either sides faces.
While the clowns were directing traffic at one intersection, a police wagon rolled by
the CIRCA checkpoint, and some of the police grinningly gave CIRCA the Clown
Salute in an appropriately ambivalent gesture of comradely contempt. Elsewhere,
one police officer, hearing the clowns do the Yes, lets exercise (in which one clown
says Lets all do X! and all other clowns in hearing range must say YES! Lets all
do X!, and do whatever X is doing in as enthusiastic and ridiculous a manner as possible), said Lets all go to the park, because thats where the clowns are going and
we have to follow them! At one point, CIRCA members were once again confronted
with a line of stonefaced police, and one of the CIRCA members began ironically
thanking the police for supporting global capitalism. The ironic speech went on a bit
long, and another clown (Verson) told the police, If you smile, Ill tell him to be quiet.
Several of the police immediately put beaming smiles on their faces (Verson). Later,
on the highway approaching Gleneagles, a group of rebel clowns came upon four
patrolmen guarding a bridge. The clowns asked them if they wanted to play a game,
and they agreed. After an explanation of the rules to Giants, Wizards and Goblins,
the two sides huddled to choose a strategy, then grinningly lined up facing each
other. On the count of three, both lines simultaneously aimed their outstretched arms
at each other and wiggled their fingers as if casting a spell. The bobbies and the
clowns had both chosen the Wizard option. They immediately obeyed the hallowed
rule of the game: if both sides choose the same creature, they have to hug. Policewizards and clown-wizards hugging after all the conflict of the days before was a
hopeful if bizarre sight (Young). While this occasional softening of relations may have
been denounced among some more hardcore and hostile anarchists, others such
as founding CIRCA member Jennifer Verson saw it as a historically-proven essential
element in destabilizing power and making real social changeestablishing a human
connection with the rank and file police, eroding the mutual and habitual anger and
stereotyping, and experimenting with new methods of interaction (Verson). CIRCA
confronts power by playing with it, by refusing the interpolation of conventional power
relations as much as possible, at the immediate point of articulation of that power in
196 | L. M. Bogad
Works Cited
Ainger, Katherine. A Global Carnival of the
Dispossessed (Z Magazine, September 1999),
reprinted in Confronting Capitalism: Dispatches
From a Global Movement. Ed. Eddie Yuen, Daniel
Burton-Rose, and George Katsiaficas. Brooklyn:
Soft Skull, 2004: 3335.
Notes
1. Gaggle is the official CIRCA term for a
small affinity group of clowns; after a bit of
discussion, we decided that squad seemed
too militaristic.
2. Direct action is a term for activist methods
that directly confront and, perhaps, disrupt or
change sociopolitical processes, as opposed to
indirect activism that seeks to lobby for change
through influencing politicians or swaying public
opinion.
3. The Diggers were an egalitarian eco-agrarian
dissident movement which formed in England in
1649.
4. The true challenge is to stay in clown even
when conventional power relationships assert
themselves. In a different neighborhood during
the Carnival for Full Enjoyment, a small gaggle of
rebel clowns was dancing in the streets with a
samba band when we were baton charged at
198 | L. M. Bogad
bearing the official Dow Chemical logo and slogans, which the BBC mistook for an
official Dow Chemical corporate site.
Instead of rehashing Dow Chemicals standard denial of responsibility for the disaster in his five-minute interview, Finisterra surprised the BBC by unveiling Dows $12
billion dollar plan to liquidate Union Carbide and use the money to finally clean up the
Bhopal site and compensate the victims.4 Less than half an hour after the announcement, prices for Dow Chemicals stock plunged four percent, resulting in a loss of $2
billion (Vanderbilt 55). The interview ran twice on the BBC and news of Dows new
plan became the top story on news.google.com before being revealed as a hoax later
that day. Following Dows official response, the Yes Men released their own explanation, which highlighted for readers what Dows response actually meant:
Dow will NOT commit ANY funds to compensate and treat 120,000 Bhopal residents
who require lifelong care. . . . Dow will NOT remediate (clean up) the Bhopal plant site. . . .
Dows sole and unique responsibility is to its shareholders, and Dow CANNOT do anything that goes against its bottom line unless forced to by law. (www.TheYesMen.org)
The Yes Mens stunt received even more attention when the BBC soon invited
Finisterra back on the air, this time under his real identity (albeit another alias, Andy
Bichlbaum) to explain the prank. Despite talk of Dow Chemical taking legal action
against the Yes Men, no lawsuit ever materialized. After this public relations nightmare, who could blame Dow Chemical for taking such heightened precautions at its
Annual General Meeting in order to curb any further embarrassing disruptions regarding its dubious response to the Bhopal disaster?
Upon discovering Dows security measures at the Annual General Meeting,
Bichlbaum and Bonanno ditch their concealed video recording devices in their van,
save a single tiny voice recorder hidden on Bichlbaum, which still sets off the metal
detector. Guards allow Bichlbaum to keep the recorder and, as Bonanna follows him
through security, a guard remarks, Loved your movie, likely referring to their first
documentary, The Yes Men (2003), which chronicles a selection of the Yes Mens
early pranks.
While most of their activist pranks rely on at least some degree of dissimulation,
on this day, Bichlbaum and Bonanno do not worry about fooling anyone. They are here
at the Midland Arts Center as the official designatories for a group of Dow Chemical
shareholders. During the SEC-mandated question and answer session, Bichlbaum,
introduced by the usher as Jude Finisterra, pulls no punches and pointedly asks
Chair of the Board Bill Stavropoulos:
We made an incredible $1.35 billion this quarter. Thats really terrific. But you know,
for most of us, thatll just mean a new set of golf clubs. I for one would forego my golf
clubs this year to do something useful insteadlike finally cleaning up the Bhopal
plant site, or funding the new clinic there. Bill, will you use Dows first-quarter profits to
finally clean up Bhopal? (www.TheYesMen.org)
situated place of state powerthe army recruitment center. Such play with and within
strategies of power offers an excellent example of an effective form of activist performance that manipulates the order imposing strategies of dominant power structures while still operating within them.
In The Practice of Everyday Life, Michel de Certeau responds to the Foucauldian
concept of disciplinary power as presented in works such as Discipline and Punish
(1977). Although de Certeau finds tremendous value in Foucaults project, he criticizes Foucault for privileging the productive apparatus of power and dangerously
ignoring how social actors manipulate this apparatus through daily practices of consumption (xiv). De Certeau writes:
If it is true that the grid of discipline is everywhere becoming clearer and more extensive, it is all the more urgent to discover how an entire society resists being reduced to it,
what popular procedures (also miniscule and quotidian) manipulate the mechanisms of
discipline and conform to them only in order to evade them, and finally, what ways of
operating form the counterpart, on the consumers (or dominees?) side, of the mute
processes that organize the establishment of socioeconomic order. (xiv)
De Certeau distinguishes his work from Foucaults by presenting as his aim the identification of an antidiscipline constituted by the procedures and ruses of consumers (xv).7 To do this, de Certeau draws from the art of warfare and its distinction
between strategies and tactics. For de Certeau, a strategy is a productive operation
of authority and can include anything endowed with power by the dominant order.
Fundamental to a strategy of power is its firm physical localization within a proper,
authorized place, i.e., an army recruiting office and its productions of laws, rituals,
languages, culture, discourses, etc. (36). Due to their heavily entrenched nature,
strategies can neither break up nor reassemble easily.
Tactics, or ways of operating, on the other hand, are more flexible and ephemeral
than strategies since they are determined by the absence of a proper locus (37).
Lacking its own place of operation, a tactic must operate within the place of a strategy according to opportunities afforded to them (xix). As de Certeau writes, while
strategies are able to produce, tabulate, and impose [spaces] . . . tactics can only
use, manipulate, and divert these spaces (30). Just as CIRCAs intervention relied
on the militarys strategic location of the recruiting office in order to succeed, tactics
can only exist as a certain play in the machine of power (30). In addition to this parasitic institutional localization, a crucial component of CIRCAs recruitment center
invasion was its mockery of a key strategy of military powerthe RAFs recruitment
of new cadets. With its campy uniforms and goofy impersonations of military behavior, CIRCA inverted the seriousness and hierarchy of the British army in order to poke
critical fun at the War in Iraq.
Like the resistant consumer practices of a system by users who are not its creators, which de Certeau describes at length in The Practice of Everyday Life, CIRCA
the militant German police. At these protests, over 500 clownbatants joined nearly
50,000 protesters for the raucous week-long carnival and blockades that welcomed
the leaders of the worlds eight most industrialized nations to the small coastal town
of Heiligendamm, Germany. For six days, these clowns poked critical fun at the massive German police presence in Heiligendamm, much to the delight of other demonstrators and the international media who devoted heavy attention to CIRCAs antics.
Nervous about a large, violent contingent of protestors rioting in the streets as tens
of thousands did at the violent 2001 Genoa G-8 protests where police killed a
demonstrator, the German government spent over $130 million on security measures
for the summit and mobilized 16,000 police officers and 1,100 military personnel,
the largest civil security deployment in Germany since the Second World War
(Landler). While the police did sporadically battle with activists, especially during the
first days mass march and rally in the harbor of Rostock, a city just a few kilometers
from Heiligendamm, it was the clowns who grabbed headlines that week as they
bewildered heavily armored police with their improvised games, dilettantish skits,
and goofy antics. In Heiligendamm, radical performance groups such as CIRCA confronted German police with a form of ironic and humorous resistance that upset the
states expectations of violent protests while criticizing the excessive and undemocratic security presence at the G-8 summit. In order for this criticism to be legible to
onlookers and the media, however, CIRCA members could neither look nor act exactly
like the police.12 Instead CIRCAs performances depended on a failed resemblance,
which required an obviously purposeful failed mimicry of the costumes, discourses,
and behaviors of the German police and military that, when documented by the
media, offered a striking contrast between the peaceful protesters and the violent
response of the state.
Such performances simultaneously appropriate and invert their objects of critique
by playing with their imagery, discourses, and behaviors. In the case of CIRCA, clowns
exchange guns and truncheons for feather dusters, water pistols, and confetti;
helmets for steel colanders and orange traffic cones; tactical belts for pink boas. To
mock the rigid hierarchy of the military while echoing the groups ideal of horizontal
organization, each clown selects his or her own name and rank, choosing ridiculous
titles such as Private Space or General Confusion. Similarly, the radical performances of the Yes Men also depend on successfully failed impersonations. Yet, while
the failure of the clowns mimicry is obvious from the outset, a Yes Men performance
depends on an initial (or in some cases prolonged) mistaken resemblance to the
government and corporate officials they impersonate. Despite the necessity of
resemblance, like the Clown Army, the intended success of a Yes Men performance
depends on a failed resemblance that publicly exposes contradictions of the
discourses played with.13 Such impersonations have a powerful subversive potential, as Kolonel Klepto, one of the founders of CIRCA, notes: Nothing undermines
authority like holding it up to ridicule and one of the most efficient techniques of
ridicule is mocking by imitation . . . The police are comfortable with confrontational
resistance but faced with the art of ridicule, they dont know how to respond (2004:
40406). Indeed, CIRCAs dilettantish imitation of the police often has a profound
disarming effect, one that exposes and engenders a response to the contradictions
and ridiculousness of authority in a way that is extremely difficult, if not impossible
to accomplish through reasoned argument. As I argue in my discussion of the work
of the Oil Enforcement Agency, this move away from rational response toward an
embrace of tools such as performative irony lies at the heart of this brand of radical
performance.
The Oil Enforcement Agency Busts the LA Auto Show
On a Saturday afternoon in December 2006, a dozen or so undercover agents from
the Oil Enforcement Agency (OEA) infiltrate the Ford display floor of the Los Angeles
Auto Show in order to make a high-profile bust.14 After locating their target, a brandnew 2007 Ford Expedition, agents quickly remove their disguises to reveal black OEA
uniforms bearing the black and white OEA insignia of a skull above two crossed gas
pump nozzles. While the other agents begin investigating the Expedition, a pair of
agents flash their badges to the gathering crowd and explain the OEAs mandate to
carry out the promise President George W. Bush set forth in his 2006 State of the
Union address when he declared, America is addicted to oil, and the country must,
move beyond a petroleum based economy. As the pair work to keep the crowd away
from the crime scene, a female agent remarks to a colleague, Looks like were going
to have to quarantine it. Two other agents then begin marking off a perimeter around
the sports utility vehicle with yellow caution tape that reads Climate Change Crime
Scene.
Attention! Were going to ask you to back up for your own safety, a tall agent, presumably the ranking officer, firmly tells the crowd, This is a dangerous greenhousegas emitting car. Please step away. This vehicle does not pass climate change MPG
regulations. We must impound this vehicle. While the crowd slowly catches the joke,
some laugh and others groan before walking away. As LA Auto Show security arrives
on the scene, OEA agents pose for newspaper photographs and hold discussions
with the remaining crowd about the lack of effort automakers such as Ford have
made to curb climate change. Soon members of the LAPD join the private security
officers and, after cordially handing the crime scene over to the local jurisdiction, the
OEA agents leave the premises, but not before making a brief statement to the Los
Angeles Times which appears in the following days morning paper.
As most witnesses to the OEA bust at the LA Auto Show quickly realized, despite
the likeness in appearance and behaviors of its members to federal enforcement
agents, the OEA is, of course, not an official government agency. Rather, it is a
and, as L.M. Bogad writes, help create a joyous counterculture that can sustain
long-term participation in a movement (2006: 52). In this well-documented turn
toward carnival in alternative globalization demonstrations in North America and
Europe, the work of Franois Rabelais on carnival and Mikhail Bakhtins work on
Rabelais have become vital to activists and scholars alike (see Duncombe; Bogad
2006; Bruner; Bakhtin). Needless to say, the radical performances of a group such
as the Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army are well-suited for the carnival, especially in their travesty of authority.
In Dream: Re-imagining Progressive Politics in an Age of Fantasy, Stephen
Duncombe addresses what he understands to be the stale state of progressive
politics in the United States. He avers that, in an age of Spectacle where consent is
constantly manufactured by the media and governments have mastered the art of
Spectacle creation,19 rational responses such as presenting facts and reasoned
arguments on behalf of progressives inspired by Enlightenment-era sensibilities have
lost much of their persuasive edge since they do not capture the imagination
and aspirations of a mass constituency. In response to this, Duncombe argues,
Progressives need to think less about presenting facts and more about how to
frame these facts in such a way that they make sense and hold meaning for everyday
people (10). He writes, Progressives should have learned to build a politics that
embraces the dreams of people and fashions spectacles which give these fantasies forma politics that understands desire and speaks to the irrational(9).
Duncombes emphasis on the importance of the irrational in political action today
resonates with the Situationist belief that, in an age of Spectacle, Dtournement is
less effective the more it approaches a rational reply (Debord and Wolman 2007).
As Duncombe and the Situationists might agree, the rational reply becomes inadequate as a political means in a cultural climate so saturated by Spectacle. This is not
to suggest that reasoned debate, sober argument, and work within political institutions cannot still be valuable for creating political change. However, one must only
look to the political force (not to mention the popularity) of television shows such as
The Colbert Report or South Park to understand what might be a popular alternative
to the rational reply. As Duncombe writes, The irrational and the emotional are
not intrinsically negative aspects of politics. They are not something that must be
prohibited, nor even necessarily something that must be civilized . . . They are, however, something that needs to be addressed if one hopes to attain, and hold, political power (36).
The force of an intervention by the Yes Men, the Clown Army, or the OEA very much
lies in the very imaginative character of their response to political concerns such as
the governments failure to reduce Americas dependency on oil or end the war in
Iraq. I would argue that the presentation of a legible political message through nonrational or bewildering means corresponds closely to what Rancire exhorts in his
vision of suitable political art where legibility of the message negotiates with a perceptible shock caused by the uncanny. With this said, a radical performance such as
the Clown Armys invasion of the RAF Recruiting Office in Leeds offers an interesting
example of such a negotiation between opposites. While onlookers and those who
learned about the action later could read the Clown Armys critique of the War in Iraq
and the absurdity of the handover of power to a puppet government controlled by the
United States, the unsignifiable presentation of this intervention ostensibly allowed
it to penetrate more deeply than a pedagogic anti-war diatribe. Similarly, the OEAs
bust of the Los Angeles Auto Show indirectly conveyed a legible message without
being overtly didactic. In both cases, the uncanny aspect of the radical performance
lies in its use of performative irony.
Performative Irony
As L.M. Bogad has convincingly argued, much of the strength behind the irony
employed in an activist performance lies in its ability to stimulate critical reflection.
In Electoral Guerrilla Theatre, Bogad demonstrates how this function of irony resonates strongly with the Verfremdungseffekt (distantiation-effect) of Bertolt Brechts
epic theater. The self-conscious use of light, music, and acting in a Brechtian production aimed at withholding the ability of audiences to empathize with the characters in
his plays while fostering their critical distance from the story presented. As Brecht
explains, the Verfremdungseffekt consists in turning the object of which one is to be
made aware, to which ones attention is to be drawn, from something ordinary, familiar, immediately accessible, into something peculiar, striking, and unexpected (143).
Similarly, a strength of the radical performances presented in this article is their
ability to illuminate the peculiarity and contradictions of a common recurrent,
universally-practiced operation of power (Brecht 145). By playing with the strategies
of power, i.e., corporate spokespeople, soldiers, and federal enforcement agents or
business conferences, recruitment centers, and car shows, albeit with a substantial
critical distance, the Yes Men, the Clown Army and the OEA encourage their audiences to reflect critically on issues that have become dangerously ordinary, familiar,
or naturalized. As a result of their unsettling dissonance with the strategy they selfconsciously cite, these radical performers seek to compel their audiences to reflect
on an unmarked power relationship or everyday ritual in a new, critical way (Bogad
2005: 9).20
It must be noted, however, that the irony employed does not simply convey a message that an audience passively accepts. Rather, as Nina Felshin writes with regard
to her discussion of activist art, irony encourages participation through interpretation (16). Thus, irony, in this case, should not merely be seen as pedagogical or
didactic. It does not impart a static, predetermined message onto a passive audience. Instead, such radical performances employ performative irony, which requires
their audiences to engage with the performances. The effect of performative irony,
however, is not predetermined but rather depends on a subjective and contextuallydependent interpretation that is triggered by the performers purposeful imperfect
citation of the rituals and operations of strategic power. For example, in order to get
an ironic joke, a listener must work to catch the irony in the joke and then make the
appropriate connections (see Bogad 2005: 3637). It is up to the listener to sort out
the significance of the dissonance embedded in the ironized performance.
In his reading of Andrew Boyds essay, Irony, Meme Warfare, and the Extreme
Costume Ball, Bogad writes, Inverted meanings and sarcastic satire can surprise
people and stimulate reflection. Irony, which throws several simultaneous meanings
at recipients, may cause passersby to do interpretive work, puncturing their
assumed frame of reference to let new light shine in (2006: 53). As Bogad implies,
irony is not merely pedagogic, but rather encourages active participation. At the
same time, however, Bogad helpfully emphasizes the uncertainty involved when
using irony. After all, there is no guarantee that an audience member will catch any
intended message of the irony, if they even catch any message at all. Drawing from
Linda Hutcheons Ironys Edge, Bogad suggests, An audience member may get the
irony as intended, may not even understand it to be ironic, or may receive it in an
unintended way . . . Irony has an edge, and it is risky for it can cut both ways (2005:
37). Therefore, like the uncanny side of political art that Rancire describes, performative irony may engage an audience didactically but doing so threatens to destroy
all political meaning (Rancire 2006: 63). To push this point further, performative
irony can indeed destroy all political meaning, but as the case of the OEAs
groaning audience members at the Los Angeles Auto Show demonstrates, it can
even engender or aggravate disdain for a particular political message or position.
Yet, in its ability to engage an audience through an indeterminacy of meanings,
performative irony works in an altogether different way than the rigid and structuring
discourse of strategic power.
Such openness is one of the chief appeals of the form of radical performance discussed in this essay as it encourages and depends on infinite options and play. The
force of such performance rests on its ability not to employ strategic power for specific ends, but also to open up new ways of operating that challenge the existing system of power and authority. These radical performances achieve political significance
not by commenting on or reflecting the dominant social or political configuration, but
rather through inserting the possibility of play into the system or exposing the fictive
foundations of structuring power. Again, these radical performances effect change
not through didacticism, but rather by virtue of their play with authority, established
hierarchies, and normative values. As a type of prefigurative politics, they create
something altogether different from the strategically imposed order of power. They
create spaces of play that have no predetermined end or meaning.
Works Cited
Bakhtin, M. Rabelais and His World. Trans. H.
Iswolsky. Bloomington: U of Indiana P, 1984.
Bey, H. From TAZ: The Temporary Autonomous
Zone. The Cultural Resistance Reader Ed. S.
Duncombe. London: Verso, 2002. 113118.
Bogad, L. M. Electoral guerrilla theatre: Radical
ridicule and social movements. New York:
Routledge, 2005.
. Radical simulation, Regulation by Prank:
The Oil Enforcement Agency. Contemporary
Theatre Review 17 (2007): 261264.
. Tactical Carnival: Social movements,
demonstrations, and dialogical performance.
A Boal Companion. Ed. J. Cohen-Cruz and M.
Schutzman. New York: Routledge, 2006. 4658.
Boyd, A. Irony, Meme Warfare, and the Extreme
Costume Ball. From ACT UP to the WTO: Urban
protest and community building in the era of
globalization. Ed. R. Hayduk and B. Shepard.
London: Verso, 2002.
Brecht, B. Brecht on Theatre: The Development
of an Aesthetic. Trans J. Willet. New York: Hill
and Wang, 1964.
Bruner, M. L. Carnivalesque Protest and the
Humorless State. Text and Performance
Quarterly 25 (2005): 136155.
de Certeau, M. The Practice of Everyday Life.
Trans. S. Rendhall. Berkeley: U of California P,
1984.
Debord, G. Society of the Spectacle. Trans.K.
Knabb. New York: AK, 2006.
Debord, G., and G. J. Wolman. A users guide
to detournement. Situationists International
Anthology. Ed. and trans. K. Knabb. New York:
Bureau Of Public Secrets, 2007.
Duncombe, S. Dream: Re-imagining progressive
politics in an age of fantasy. New York: New,
2007.
Notes
1. I draw the following details of the Yes Mens
action at Dow Chemicals Annual General
Meeting from the information posted on the
Yes Mens website, http://theyesmen.org/en/
hijinks/dowannualmeeting accessed 4/24/09.
2 Around midnight on December 3, 1984, 27
tons of poisonous gas began leaking from a
factory owned by Union Carbide Corporation in
Bhopal, India. Because none of the factorys
safety systems were operational, the gas spread
throughout the city of Bhopal, exposing half a
million people. Since then, 20,000 people have
died due to exposure to the leak and over
120,000 people still suffer from the accident.
The resulting pollution has yet to be properly
cleaned up. In 2001, Dow Chemical purchased
Union Carbide, yet the corporation has refused to
clean up the site, adequately compensate the
victims, or even disclose the composition of the
gas leak. Bhopal.com, http://www.bhopal.org/
whathappened.html
3. As the Yes Mens documentation of the prank
explains, the alias Jude Finesterra combines
Jude, the patron saint of the impossible, and
Finisterra, earths end. www.theYesMen.org
4. In addition, Finisterra announced that Dow
Chemical would push for the extradition of Union
Carbides former CEO, Warren Anderson, to India,
the country he fled twenty years earlier after
being arrested on multiple homicide charges.
A video of the BBC interview and other details
regarding the prank can be found on the Yes
Mens website www.TheYesMen.org
5. I draw the term radical performance from
performance studies theorist Baz Kershaw who,
in his 1999 text The Radical in Performance,
used the term as a category for encompassing
a number of different politically-engaged
performances ranging from outdoor communitybased performances to the Tienneman Square
demonstrations. In describing the radical
performance, which he favors over the term
political theatre Kershaw writes, In other
words, the freedom that radical performance
invokes is not just freedom from oppression,
Appendix:
Inventory of Practices
Chainworkers
www.Chainworkers.org is the Italian webzine on media and mall activism for awarenessbuilding and unionization of precarious workers. Since 2001, ChainWorkers CreW has
been associated with:
the May Day parade bringing together many types of non-standard workers
from all around Europe onto the streets in a joyful (but angry) expression of dissent
around sub-standard conditions of work and living. Mayday Parade is the first
European self-organized demonstration against precarization. Traditionally, Mayday
represented aging unions and the traditional left, both too stale and backward looking to see what social mobilizations society is asking for from us. We think that the
future lies in developing forms of self-mobilization and production of conflict across
wider political spaces, in expressing political and social claims independently
working with existing radical parties and existing radical unions and associations
but as an autonomous force and with new imagery.
www.euromayday.org
San Precario Conceived and designed before Mayday 004 had become the
patron saint of precarious workers. His icon includes the five axes of non precarity:
income, housing, affect, access, and services. From the beginning, San Precario was
imagined as a dtournement of popular tradition. This tradition is at once appropriated in the formal aspects and subverted in the contents. San Precario is the
mythopoetical patron saint of dispossessed but combative subjects, with the intention of rejuvenating the popular imagination of a fight for new social rights.
www.sanprecario.org
Serpica Naro is the anagram of San Precario: existential instability and social
precarity are turned into active resources, creativity and experimentation meet the
agitation and representation of social conflict. The protest against the fashion week
had already been in our minds and in our hearts for quite some time. We were just
looking for the right key to tune ourselves on.
Compared to a brand like all the others created expressly for the market in order
to determine the (empty) relations which channel consumption, Serpica has revealed
itself to be the opposite: that is, a MetaBrand created by real relations which autorepresent themselves in it, producing social improvement (for who produces it) and
value (which must be rechannelled in the social).
Appendix | 221
222 | Appendix
Which choice should I make? These are questions depending on the will and desires
of those who want to face their future. Why did we connect the tarots and precarity?
Of course, we do not think that the struggle against precarity has a magical or occult
side to it, but the characteristic of each card can be useful to spur you to think about
what happens around you and to suggest some strategies to re/act. Remember that
each tarot has many meanings, some positive and some negative, and most of them
acquire new meaning if matched with other cards during your pick.
http://cartomanzia.precaria.org
If precarity is social and invades every aspect of our lives, it is obvious that our collective action ought to start from each of the sites where our lives take place, both
inside and outside the workplace. Individuals are precarious because they dont have
access to the information they need about the conditions of their own contracts. And,
above all, they are isolated in relation to others in their workplace. We need to break
through this isolation.
We have been thinking for years that communication is one of the strategic sectors for those who want to make us precarious. Communication not only as a mere
media project, but as a deeper awareness of the fact that, in Information Society, the
control of the way data are managed is a strategic tool to determine imaginary and
meanings. If mainstream media is a space to ideologically redefine relationships
and reality, we have to be able to create forms of communication and media that
we have called social media: media created by precarious people direct participactivation; media that cannot be reduced to reproduction of goods and its ideological value; media that can represent precarious people and be, at the same time, a
true form of conspiracy that cannot be absorbed by neoliberist production tools and
mechanism. We do not want to go into the mainstream communication system; we
want to overcome it, to infiltrate its every corner and to appear as something that
cannot be controlled or made into profit.
Appendix | 223
224 | Appendix
the project Builders (2005), in which the group restaged a classical socialist realist
masterpiece from the late 1950s, which then falls apart and comes back together. In
September 2006, Chto delat also initiated a project called Self-Educations, an
international exhibition and seminar program at the NCCA in Moscow, dedicated to
alternative, community-based forms of self-learning as emancipatory practices.
All of these projects have been accompanied by newspapers, of which 17 have
been produced so far. The newspaper is fully bilingual (English/Russian). The editorial process draws artists, critics, activists, and philosophers into a heated editorial
debate, which results in theoretical essays, art projects, open-source translations,
questionnaires, dialogues, and comic strips. This take-away publication is distributed
for free at congresses or exhibitions, social forums and rallies where it reaches a
broader cultural public. A complete set of issues, as well as documentation of art
projects and current information can be found at www.chtodelat.org.
Appendix | 225
The members of Critical Art Ensemble (CAE) always hoped that we could complete
our collaboration without ever having to produce works about war. We hoped never to
hit viewers in the head with this blunt object of a topic, and were sure that more fascinating, undeveloped subject matter was readily available. Unfortunately, the current
situation in the US and its involvement in the Middle East have made impossible
CAEs humble desire to escape the issue of war. The neoconservatives are attempting to create a military state designed to undertake a series of imperial invasions
and to end democracy at home. Two wars have already begun (Afghanistan and Iraq),
along with the media campaign for a third with Iran, and more wars (Lebanon and
Syria) are on the way if the neoconservatives can engineer them in time. In this context, CAE came to believe that all our efforts, from small everyday life gestures to
complex projects, had to aim at undermining the anti-democratic agenda and the war
actions of the neoconservatives, and to reinforce the emerging understanding among
the American public that the neoconservatives are totalitarians of an order that has
not been seen in the West since World War II.
CAEs first major effort in this area was to examine the consequences of a lesser
known initiative in the USthe illegal reinstatement of the germ warfare program.
The reemergence of this program has come at the expense of a productive global
health policy. Many of the resources that were used to fight emergent infectious disease were hijacked by the State Department and US military, and instead of serving
the public interest, they now serves the militarys. The military is not interested in any
of the current health crises in infectious diseases (AIDS, TB, malaria, hepatitis, etc.),
but rather, with weaponizable scary germs like Ebola, anthrax, and smallpox.1
Limited resources once used to fight ongoing health crises killing millions world wide
are increasingly used instead as means to explore paranoid and ill-informed military
fantasies. The projects that followed this research were a series of actions grounded
in the theater of the absurd that were later turned into films. CAE recreated a number of germ warfare tests as public gestures of futility (if not stupidity) that would
remind people why these programs were all halted forty years ago in every country
except Russia and, now again, in the US.
Currently, we have turned our attention to bombs. Not those that grab all the headlines like suicide bombers, improvised explosive devices, nuclear bombs, or even
laser guided smart bombs (or was that the last Gulf war?), but those that keep a low
profile. Immolation is our first installment in this series. We dont hear much about
226 | Appendix
firebombs, but they are being used on a regular basis in the Middle East. From the
point of view of the military, one can understand why, as they have always been real
morale crushers. People have a primal fear of being burned alive, so while they are
functionally not the most lethal bombs in the arsenal, they command a terrifying emotional economy, and sometimes that is just the kind of hammer believed necessary
to pound an enemy (there cannot be shock and awe without them). However, what
boosts this unnecessary practice beyond barbarity and into raw criminality is that firebombs are being used to immolate civilians and destroy civilian property. The US has
consistently refused to sign any international treaty that bans the use of incendiary
weapons against civilians.2 The protocol for this treaty is quite simple; do not use
them against civilians. A military can use incendiary weapons against the enemy and
its resources, it can produce as many of these weapons as it wants and it may stockpile them, but that is not good enough for the US: it requires time-honored favorites
like napalm (new recipe and name; same effect) and white phosphorous to bomb
civilians.
But for CAE, the real question was how to represent this unfortunate series of
occurrences. Currently, a flood of war representation is blasting the American public
from all major media sourcesmost of which are not particularly helpful to the cause
of peace or are outright propaganda. Whether one is watching the evening news, or
Hollywood war films, or the latest Public Broadcast documentary, the dominant ideological position (contradiction) is We hate the war, but we love our heroic troops.
The old aphorism from Gandhi Hate the sin; love the sinner is as fresh as ever.
This is the bait and switch rhetoric that was identified by Roland Barthes as cultural
inoculation3: Represent the war as horrible and unjust, and the troops as flawed
people just trying to survive a terrifying ordeal by any means they can. But once this
confession is made, reverse the rhetoric and say that, in fact for doing this, they are
heroes, and that in order to support them, war must be tolerated and/or perpetuated
and any culpability for the horror must be indefinitely deferred. Add that, if one does
not uphold this position, one is not supporting the troops (a platitude of political
hackery that presents itself as self-evident and unchallengeable, but in reality only
serves the political interests of the war mongers as opposed to anyone in an actual
war). The twisted anti-logic of this position is truly indicative of a deep ideological
sickness.
These representations that carry this ideological virus all participate in a common
set of characteristics. First, the representations revel in their construction of the real.
What is the sound of a specific model of machine gun firing from one hundred meters
away? How does blood spatter when a soldier is shot in the chest by a snipers rifle
of a given model from a particular angle? Those producing the fictional or recreated
images know the answers to these questions and attempt to reproduce this knowledge in image/sound form with great fidelity.
Appendix | 227
Second, the stories should occur on a human scale, and the storyteller should
avoid the grand narratives of the clash of civilizations. Humanizing war is very important if it is to be forgiven in the end. These stories cannot be told with abstractions,
numbers, or with larger-than-life characters. If sympathetic inhumanity is to be
achieved (and this is an impressive visual effect) an intersubjective relationship
between the viewer and his digital counterpart must be established. Viewers must
find themselves identifying with inhumanity, and thereafter, must call it human so as
not to absorb the guilt and the horror themselves. In war, to be human is to be an
imperfect victim who is a hero.
This was the style from which CAE was trying to distance itself when we made
Immolationa two channel video installation on the illegal use of firebombs by the
US. We had to find a way that this series of images could not be infiltrated and contaminated by Support the Troops. We hoped to deliver a different experience of war
imagery that maintained the terrible alienation of war, but still allow viewers to personally imagine themselves in the narrative, but not through a sympathetic or empathetic identification with the humanity of the inhumane. Thus, the first element we
eliminated was human scale, along with humans themselves, and replaced them with
grand landscapes of destruction and micro visions of cellular health followed by
decimation to the point of disintegration.
CAE is currently working on debunking the myth of the dirty bomb a sick fantasy, from the mind of the neofascist John Ashcroft, that has gained traction in the
popular imagination in the US. Even the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which
has every interest in keeping the hoax going, has had to admit that a dirty bomb is
not a weapon of mass destruction. And, most radiological dispersion devices would
not release enough radiation to kill people or cause severe illness. They only cause
panic and that is only because the pubic has been repeatedly told by war and fear
mongers that they should panic. By the end of this year, we hope CAE will be able to
put this portion of work behind us and get back to what we were doing before this
national nightmare beganfighting neoliberalisms global initiatives.
Notes
1. For a complete analysis, please see Marching
Plague: Germ Warfare and Global Public Health.
New York: Autonomedia, 2005.
2. See signatories for The Certain Conventional
Weapons Convention (CCW), Protocol III (Protocol
on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of
228 | Appendix
Identity Permutations
The Art of 0100101110101101.ORG
Domenico Quaranta
Jesus, strength and wisdom of God, awaken in us the love of the Holy Scriptures,
where resounds the Fathers voice, that illuminates and blares up,
that feeds and comforts.
Pope John Paul II, Prayer for the preparation of the Grand Jubilee 2000
When the collective 0100101110101101.ORG burst onto the scene between 1999
and 2000, it was like fireworks exploding in the intricate mesh of the net, or as
though a dozen snipers had suddenly begun firing at the same target from different
positions. It was difficult to establish their identity, but one thing for sure was that
behind that codename there was a team, a fast-acting, extremely talented team.
Their statements and interviews always featured different names. They inhabited the
web like a natural element. It was evident that they had been in training for a long
time, before firing the first shot. They knew what to aim for and they always hit their
target. They bombarded mailing lists and got the media in a flap, like the Gauls
among the Capitoline geese. They began with a series of thefts, and claimed
responsibility for two colossal hoaxes, one attacking the art system, the other the
Vatican. Their links with Luther Blissett, their accents and the geographic location of
the Darko Maver project placed them in Italy, in Bologna to be precise, but their roots
were as mobile as their cultural references, which ranged from the American
pranksters to the Balcanic avant-garde Neue Slowenische Kunst. In time, the aura of
mystery gradually lifted, thanks in large measure to the total transparency of later
works, Life_Sharing (20002003) and Vopos (2002). Then they themselves decided
to clear up the identity question once and for all, or rather, flesh out two of their many
fictitious identities, presenting themselves as Eva and Franco Mattes.
Their first public action dates back to February 1999: in a spectacular stunt,
0100101110101101.ORG downloaded the entire contents of Hell.com and published these on their own site, with one minor change to the interface which subverted the whole concept of the site. Hell.com was a private platform for artistic
experimentation, like an online workshop closed to the public. Entrance was by invitation only, on a private basis, or on rare public occasions, such as the exhibition
Surface, which opened in February 1999 and was reserved to the community of
Rhizome, of which 0100101110101101.ORG just happened to be members. In June
1999, it was the turn of Art.Teleportacia, the newly opened web gallery belonging to
Appendix | 229
Russian artist Olia Lialina; then in September Jodi.org, one of the acknowledged
masterpieces of net.art, was cloned.
A private site, an online gallery, a web-based work of art: 0100101110101101
.ORGs heists wove a complex statement about the contradictions entailed in producing culture on the net, in a context characterized by the persistence of copyright,
but also the perfect reproducibility of data; all the hype surrounding interactivity, but
also the closed nature of works; attempts at commercialization, but also the death
of the unique work of art. As they explained, naturally plagiarizing someone else:
Copies are more important than their original, although they do not differ from them.
Copies contain not only all the parameters of the work that is being copied, but a lot
more: the idea itself and the act of copying. 1 Appropriating a work of art means
interacting with it, using it in ways not foreseen by the artist. This can range from
simple plagiary to the collage-based operation Hybrids (19981999), developed in
that period, which restored the original revolutionary nature of the collage.
Initially, the way in which 0100101110101101.ORG used key techniques such as
culture jamming, guerrilla communications, plagiarism, and defacement had very little in common with other instances of media hacktivism. And 0100101110101101
.ORG intentionally distanced itself from those: If you do what we do with a work of
art, the operation has a value in itself [. . .]. If you steal the Disney site, you are acting against Disney [. . .] we are not interested in doing this kind of hacktivism. We
work on other contradictions like originality and reproduction, authorship and network, copyright and plagiarism. 2
The copy trilogy was completed in December 2001 with a work entitled
FTPermutations, making way for another series dedicated to the theme of transparency (glasnost) of data and the omnipresence of surveillance. Like its predecessors, FTPermutations was a minimal piece of performance art which had an
explosive effect. Having been invited to participate in the Korea Web Art Festival in
Seoul, 0100101110101101.ORG uploaded its files on the shows FTP server as
requested, but the night before the opening, the collective changed the names of all
the directories, thus dissociating the names of the artists (linked from the homepage) and their works. The artists mutinied and the curator was fired. The collective,
on the other hand, chose to see this as permutation rather than sabotage. They
were asked for web art, digital products, and they made net.art, manipulating network
protocols. We have never produced anything. 0100101110101101.ORG only moves
packages of information from one point to another, diverts their flow, observes changes,
and eventually profits from it, they later explained.[3]
In the meantime, their notoriety was growing, thanks also to having claimed
responsibility for two spectacular projects ongoing since 1998: the Darko Maver
operation and the project Vaticano.org, considered to the very first internet coup.
0100101110101101.ORG purchased the domain www.vaticano.org, which at the
230 | Appendix
time was still available, and published the entire contents of the Papacys official
site, www.vaticano.va there. They then got to work on a major edit, an operation midway between satire and what the Yes Men call identity correction. Between learned
quotes from the Holy scriptures, the Pope and other high prelates appropriated pop
songs, and exalted free love, brotherly intolerance between religions, the oblivion
of the senses and international friendships. They invoked the success of student
movements and claimed their own duty to civil and electronic disobedience. In the
Intermediatic Decree on Communications Tools, the Great Cathodic Church explained
its Total Domination Plan, in terms of Technomoral Law, Telesalvation, and Holy
Public Opinion, coolly referencing the anathemas of Father Mcluhan. Yet the power
of the interfacethat the Vatican, in a nod to tradition, has maintained intact until
nowwas such that it fooled around 200,000 viewers in the space of a year
(December 1998December 1999), who put in a total of 50,000 hours of navigation.
In December 1999, the Vatican, in a genuine operation of international espionage,
put two and two together, but 0100101110101101.ORG managed to ensure that
the silence in which the act of censorship was carried out was a deafening one.
Out of all 0100101110101101.ORGs works, Vaticano.org is probably the project
which comes closest to politically-based media hacktivism. Yet once again, politics
and ideology appear alien to the Italian collective. When asked, Can you change politics and social behaviour with your art work? the answer was: I dont care. My only
responsibility is to be irresponsible. 4 Vaticano.org was an act of pure narration, an
identity appropriation designed to create a new subject, a new spectacular entity: a
Free Spirit Jubilee. In their words, The Internet Coup is a spectacle for the Netizens,
a hit performance for the masses, online for a year, every day and every night, this is
Media Rock n Roll! 5
This stance emerged with even greater clarity in two of the groups most recent
creations: Nikeground (20032004) and United We Stand (2005-2006). In the former, at various levels of action (urban performance and net-based communications),
they donned the role of a giant multinational company, Nike, in the process of taking
over a public urban area. The latter, meanwhile, was in the form of a marketing campaign to promote a non-existent film. While in the first, media impact was sought and
achieved, thanks also to the reaction from Nike (which reported the artists for breach
of copyright), in the second this dimension disappears, so much so that the project
was exhibited in galleries (first in Bologna, then in New York), as a work substantially
in line with the public performance. In narrowing the gap between action and claim,
0100101110101101.ORG revealed that its real objective was not media impact, but
the production of meaning, the construction of a narration, or a performance-based
situation exploring one of the key themes of their oeuvre: identity as a narrative construct, a pile of symbols which can be infinitely manipulated, and if need be plagiarized, the fruit of the interweaving of different flows of information. In their works,
Appendix | 231
identity can be built from scratch using a few narrative stereotypes (artist maudit
Darko Maver), or a corporate image (Nike, the Vatican) which is both highly distinctive
and powerfully conditioning, to be subverted and rewritten. A tenuous identity
(Europe) can be unmasked when seen through the narrative stereotypes and iconography of a Hollywood action blockbuster, while the personal identity of Eva and Franco
Mattes, also known as 0100101110101101.ORG, actually becomes more elusive
with the more details that are added, and paradoxically, the more constructed it
appears, the more authentic it feels.
Notes
1. Uri Pasovsky, Life imitates art and art
imitates itself, in Haaretz, 19 Sept 2000.
2. Tilman Baumgrtel, No Artists, just
Spectators. An interview with the artist group
0100101110101101.ORG which became
famous for copying art websites, in Telepolis,
9 Dec 1999.
3. Jaka Zeleznikar, Now youre in my computer.
Interview with 0100101110101101.ORG, in
Mladina, January 2001.
232 | Appendix
.
I Mihrak
Summoning the Ghost of Netchaiev
Life becomes resistance to power when power takes life as its object.
Gilles Deleuze
i-mihrak literally translates as internal focus; a term widely used in the context
of Turkish nationalism(s) to define domestic groups engaged in so-called treason,
with or without foreign support. The adoption of the name can help elucidate fundamental principles of the group; that is ironical transgression of any established
cultural/political nomos, be it legal, political, traditional, popular, humanistic, secular,
or religious.
i-mihrak is a post-anarchism oriented cultural intervention group that was founded
in Istanbul in 2007. It operates as a collective, non-hierarchical, anti-authoritarian
consensus-based semiotic terrorism group working on the immediate and historical
political and cultural discourse in Turkey. Although it most commonly utilizes street
stickers and web blogs, it is open to any methodology capable of disturbing the
peace of mind of city inhabitants and administrators. It works by contorting, distorting, and turning down official, popular, and traditional cultural epistemes with the
hoped outcome of parrhesia, a truthful clearing of mind about matters of urgent significance to the people.
i-mihraks preferred work space is the street, which is the post-dystopian target of
discipline, surveillance, and even physical coercion. People walking on the street have
a legitimate expectation to come across commercial images or official announcements. i-mihrak works present people with the opportunity to see texts and images
that can be reacted to before interruption by state-appropriated reason, usually with a
kind of preconscious anger or joy. The message is delivered to the viewer directly
through the nomadic-art-machine, without fraudulent alteration by Art establishment.
Members of i-mihrak do not consider themselves artists, even though, by many
accounts, they are considered within the scope of street art. They more correctly
define themselves as anarchist activists making use of visual arts as a method of
struggle to reclaim and defend the cultural territory against exploitation by the state
and its official and unofficial apparatus. What is worthy for i-mihrak is not a politicized art, but a brand of decentralized and rhizomatic micropolitics that invokes art
as well as other forms of resistance: a politics of everyday reality which haunts the
mind and determines ordinary conduct.
i-mihrak uses connotation, irony, metaphor, and many ancient methods of the
grotesque to present its subject matter. It tries to do so without being obsessed with
Appendix | 233
*Maksudyan, Nazan, Gauging Turkishness: Anthropology as Science Fiction and the Racist Aspect of
Turkish Nationalism, Istanbul: Metis, 2005.
234 | Appendix
Peace/Fighters
Refusal movements in Israel
Noa Roei
It is a well-known fact that enlisting in the Israeli army is mandatory for all Israeli citizens. It may be less known that, after excluding the non-Jewish population, the ultraorthodox Jews, the handicapped, and married women, less than 60% end up serving
in the Israeli Defense Force (IDF). Regardless of these facts, the truism of everyone
has to serve remains strong on the ideological level. Those who wish to avoid military service on the basis of political disagreement with government and military policy are heavily criticized by the state, and also by their fellow citizens who often regard
them as a fifth column, as traitors to the cause, endangering the very existence of
their country. The refusers, on their end, base their decisions and actions on human
rights law, and on national and international support groups, to give a counterforce to
the national, social, political, and juridical pressure placed upon them to serve in the
military. Several refusal movements have emerged within Israel throughout the years,
with different attitudes and solutions to the predicaments of refusing military service
in Israel. What follows is a shortand necessarily incompleteoverview of left-wing
refusal movements. More detailed information can be found on the movements
respective websites and on www.refusersolidarity.net.
The high school seniors letters (1970, 1987, 2001, 2002, 2005)
The first public manifesto of high school seniors was sent to Golda Meir in 1970. It
did not officially call for refusal, but stated the future recruits dilemmas and doubts,
and led to a public debate. Throughout the years, more letters were sent, each time
with a growing number of signatures and a stronger voice of dissent. The last manifesto, in 2005, numbered more than 300 signatures and declared their refusal to to
take part in the occupation and repression policy adopted by the Government of
Israel. Due to heavy social pressure, only a small number of signatories carried their
refusal to the end, but the manifestos created a social and medial impact.
Yesh Gvul www.yeshgvul.org
Founded in 1982, at the wake of the first Lebanon war, Yesh Gvul is the oldest and
most established refuser movement in Israel. Yesh Gvul (there is a limit) campaigned against the first and the second Lebanon wars as well as against the occupation of the Palestinian territories by morally and materially backing soldiers who
Appendix | 235
refuse duties of a repressive or aggressive nature. Note that Yesh Gvul does not call
for total refusal, but supports selective refusal, where each soldier or future recruit
decides and draws his/her own limits for him/herself.
New Profile www.newprofile.org
The feminist platform New Profile was founded in 1998. It is comprised of men and
women who understand Israeli society to be heavily militarized and work toward its
civil-ization. The platform offers information workshops and support for doubting
future recruits, as well as a space to discuss social problems that do not fit the narrow scope of direct enlistment or refusal, such as the militarization of the education
system. The platform operates according to feminist working principles and is the
largest anti-military (read: radical) organization in Israel today.
The combatants letter (2002) and the pilots letter (2003)
During the second Intifada, two manifestos from soldiers of elite military units
shocked the general public. Calling for an end to offensive military actions on civilian
population beyond the 1967 border, these letters empowered the refusal movement
due to the high regard in which Israeli society holds its elite unit soldiers. The catch
was that, while a soldiers word is taken seriously, the soldier is supposed to remain
loyal to the system, and thus many of the signatories were kicked out of their units,
thereby losing their prestigious social status.
Courage to Refuse www.couragetorefuse.org
Founded in 2002, Courage to Refuse is the product of the combatants letter. The
movement includes soldiers and reserve officers who refuse to serve beyond the
1967 borders but shall continue serving in the Israel Defense Forces in any mission
that serves Israels defense. The movement employs a prominent Zionist discourse
as well as a military character, and thus offers the option of refusal also to those who
agree with mainstream Israeli ideology.
Breaking the Silence www.shovrimshtika.org
Breaking the Silence (2004) is an organization of veteran Israeli soldiers that collects
testimonies of soldiers who served in the occupied territories during the Second
Intifadah. The testimonies are published and distributed in various media, including
booklets, exhibitions, and an internet website. Through this distribution as well as
through organized tours to the occupied city of Hebron, group members aim to raise
public attention and accountability for the questionable routine behavior of the army in
the occupied territories. The group does not officially call for refusal. It functions as an
alternative information center and asks its audience to reach their own conclusions.
236 | Appendix
Appendix | 237
At the beginning of the twenty-first century, voting computers had almost entirely
replaced traditional pencil and paper ballots in Dutch elections. This resulted from
the local authorities wish 20 years earlier to modernize the voting process and
expedite the declaration of election results, which the national government endorsed.
Apart from a few rural municipalities, Amsterdam was the only large city still voting
the old way. When it also embraced electronic voting in 2005, often asked but
never properly addressed questions regarding the integrity and security of the voting
system resurfacedthis time with a very different outcome.
This was the handy work of the We Do Not Trust Voting Computers initiative,
a motley group of hackers, political activists, and academic researchers brought
together and co-ordinated by Rop Gonggrijp, Netherlands best-known hacker-cum-ICT
entrepreneur. Right from the beginning, the group worked with a supple yet sophisticated plan de campagne with clear aims and job distribution. This characteristic
was strengthened further when it became a foundation, with (one) salaried staff
member, sponsored by Rops business.
At the very start of what would be a year-and-a-half campaign, an incredible amount
of technical deficiencies, political indifference if not callousness, and plain incompetence among all actors involved came to light regarding the whole development,
decision-making, and implementation process around voting computers. Armed with the
Dutch Right to Information Act, the group unearthed a wealth of very compromising documents, much to the chagrin of the authorities and of voting computer manufacturers.
The voting computer market at the time was in the hands of two firms, SDU
Newvote and Nedap-Groenendaal, the latter being a somewhat loose affiliate of the
Nedap group of industries. The former company quickly left the stage when its computers were decertified due to a security flawbut it had commanded only 10% of
the sector. Nedap-Groenendaal, together with the Dutch government, thus became
the main targets of the groups criticism, and were properly trounced in the process.
First, its in-house ueber-geeks took a Nedap voting computer apart to prove that
it was easily re-programmable (for demonstration purposes it was made to play
chess!). The media naturally loved such spectacular footage. The computer itself
actually three of themwere simply bought by the foundation from municipalities
which had no further use for them. Second, the group systematically debunked all
arguments Nedap-Groenendaal put forward in defense of its products and practices.
238 | Appendix
It was greatly helped by that firms own blundering, often bordering on the hysterical:
Nedap-Groenendaals boss once demanded Gonggrijps arreston terrorism charges!
He subsequently threatened the Dutch government that he would scuttle the (electronic) electoral processby simply withdrawing.
Accomplished management of its complex relationship with the authorities was
the groups third ace in the hole, while playing of the media was its fourth but not lowest trump card. The government, assailed by repeated, well-orchestrated, rounds of
questions in parliament and select committees, had reluctantly given in on separate
issues before being forced to appoint an enquiry commission, which eventually came
up with a scathing report on the whole business of electronic voting. And the media
were more than happy to pick up the unfolding saga under the David vs. Goliath
line. Gonggrijps outstanding communication skills did the rest.
In the end, the whole scenario of voting in the Netherlands had to be reversed
pending further research and development. The entire country will vote with pencil
and paper ballots in the next election, due in 2009 (European parliament). NedapGroenendaal is still contesting this decision in and out of court, in a fight that makes
the firm appear rather more foolhardy than brave. We Do Not Trust Voting
Computers is meanwhile lobbying for retaining the paper and pencil ballot (if it aint
broke, dont fix it). And in case the craving for ICT is simply irrepressible, smarter
computer assisted voting systems with a verifiable paper trail and running on open
source software would be an unconditional requirement.
During the campaign, the group also received massive foreign support from similar initiatives in the United States, Ireland, Germany, and other countries, and has
given the same in turn. This most likely spells the end worldwide of current votingcomputer based practices, and of the monopolistic business ambitions of their manufacturers and vendors.
The lessons that can be learned from what probably has been the most successful ever citizen-based action group in the Netherlands are diverse and, on the whole,
positive. Dedication, expertise, openness of mind and alliances, a fact-based approach
and being economic with ideological pronouncements beyond widely accepted
principles of fairness and citizens rights, have all been keys to success. Possibly
less reproducible arebeyond its chairmans charm and charismathe foundations
relatively deep pockets, which enabled it to hire attorneys, maintain a staffed office,
and simply write checks when it wanted voting computers to dismantle. All the same,
it shocked the country, and its success was heard as a clear clarion call for more and
more daring citizens activism.
We Do Not Trust Voting Computers
http://www.wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet.nl (Dutch, very comprehensive)
http://www.wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet.nl/English
(selected
items
Appendix | 239
Temporary Services
Temporary Services is Brett Bloom, Salem Collo-Julin, and Marc Fischer. We are
based in Illinois and have existed, with several changes in membership and structure, since 1998. We produce exhibitions, events, projects, and publications. The distinction between art practice and other creative human endeavors is irrelevant to us.
The best way of testing our ideas has been to do so without waiting for permission
or invitation. We invent infrastructure or borrow it when necessary. We were not
taught this in school. We try different approaches, inspired by others equally frustrated by the systems they inherited, who created their own methods for getting work
into the public.
Temporary Services started as an experimental exhibition space in a working
class neighborhood of Chicago. Our name directly reflects the desire to provide art
as a service to others. It is a way for us to pay attention to the social context in which
art is produced and received. Having Temporary Services displayed on our window
helped us to blend in with the cheap restaurants, dollar stores, currency exchanges,
and temporary employment agencies on our street. We were not immediately recognizable as an art space. This was partly to stave off the stereotypical role we might
have played in the gentrification of our neighborhood. We werent interested in making art for sale. Within the boundaries of what sells, artists often carve out tiny
aesthetic niches to protect, peddle, and repeat indefinitely, rather than opening themselves up to new possibilities.
Experiencing art in the places we inhabit on a daily basis remains a critical concern for us. It helps us move art from a privileged experience to one more directly
related to how we live our lives. A variety of people should decide how art is seen and
interpreted, rather than continuing to strictly rely on those in power. We move in and
out of officially sanctioned spaces for art, keeping one foot in the underground
and the other in the institution. Staying too long in one or the other isnt healthy. We
are interested in art that takes engaging and empowering forms. We collaborate
among ourselves and with others, even though this may destabilize how people
understand our work.
Against competition
Much of the art world is structured to favor competition. Grants are competitive.
Students compete for funding. Hundreds compete for a single teaching position.
Artists compete with artistsstealing ideas instead of sharing them, or using copyright laws to prohibit thoughtful re-use. Artists compete for shows in a limited number of exhibition spaces instead of finding their own ways to exhibit outside these
240 | Appendix
venues. Artists conceal opportunities from their friends as a way of getting an edge
up in this speculative capital-driven frenzy. Gallerists compete with other gallerists
and curators compete with curators. Artists who sell their work compete for the
attention of a limited number of collectors. Collectors compete with other collectors
to acquire the work of artists.
Temporary Services seeks to create and participate in ethical relationships that
are not competitive and are mutually beneficial. We develop strategies for harnessing the ideas and energies of people who may have never participated in an art
project before, or who may feel excluded from the art community. We mobilize
the generosity of many people to produce projects on a scale that none of us could
achieve in isolation. We strive toward aesthetic experiences built upon trust and
unlimited experimentation.
Appendix | 241
242 | Appendix
Appendix | 243
attempt to flog their wares to corrupt regimes, impoverished nations and war mongers, all with the full support of the UK government. We have been actively campaigning against the fair for six years, however each time we went down to protest,
we just ended up getting dragged around by burly policemen. This year, we decided to
take things up a notch or ten and started fund raising to buy a tank. Our intention was
to drive the tank into the fair, amidst the protests, and auction it off to the highest
bidder, regardless of whether they were an angry black block teenager, or a docklands
worker on the brink of a mental breakdown. Taking a page from the arms dealers
book, we decided morals were not important. The police, however, seemed rather
concerned with our plan. After weeks of fundraising, we finally managed to purchase
a secondhand 8.5 ton Saracen armored personnel carrier (suitably tank-like and
scary). By this point, we were pretty much under 24-hour police surveillance.
The day of the fair arrived and the lock-up in which our tank was hidden was surrounded by about 150 policemen and seven vans. The tank team boarded our vehicle, revved the engine and turned on the A-team soundtrack, before trundling into the
mass of slightly concerned looking police. The police ended up using typical protestor tactics and formed a human shield in front of our tank, hoping that we were nice
enough not to squish them. What followed was a tense two-hour stand off between
our tank and the police who were adamant we could not drive it to the fair. Just as all
seemed lost, one of our agents climbed onto the turret of the tank and made an
announcement.
Ladies and Gentlemen, Im afraid I have a sad announcement to make. It seems
the police are doing everything in their power to delay us today, and prevent our perfectly legal vehicle from driving on the road. We dont want to hold you up any longer
as the worlds largest arms fair is happening, and the police seem more interested
in stopping legitimate protest than stopping some of the most corrupt and nasty people on the planet. However, we have just had a very important phone call from two of
our agents who couldnt be here today. Apparently our SECOND TANK, a great big
tracked 60 ton tank has just left its location and is rolling toward the fair as we
speak. We suggest you follow our agents and go to meet it.
Cue utter chaos, and shock on the faces of the police, a mad scramble to their
vans and a race between protestors and police to reach the front doors of the fair. As
they arrived, a 60-ton white-tracked tank was pulling up at the doors, and suited
hijacker arms dealers and half-naked promotion girls and boys were climbing to the
top to begin our auction. Space Hijackers-1, Metropolitan Police-0.
I think our favorite review sums things up nicely: Their projects are like all those
drunk ideas for saving the world that you have in the pub, except this lot wake up in
the morning and actually do them.
www.spacehijackers.org
244 | Appendix
Militourism in Turkey
Politics of Irony, Fun, Rebellion
Yavuz Atan and Can Baskent
Appendix | 245
objector women. The reason was to protest the humiliation of women embedded in
militarist point of view. Turkey became the only country where there are conscientious
objector women while military service is not obligatory for women. This provides a
new perspective for the struggle of women and the anti-militarist movement.
The most important feature of the festivals is the fact that they were clear civil disobedience actions against the existing regulation in Turkey necessitating permission
from the government to gather and demonstrate. Several conscientious objectors
who were being searched have participated in the activities which were announced
with all clarity in advance. Therefore, militourism festivals turned out to be a part of
the festival series that temporarily liberate the streets.
We know it since the Paris Commune: revolution is the festival of the oppressed!
246 | Appendix
NOBESE
Anti-Surveillance Players
We are people who are sick of being spied upon, being under control every moment
of our lives, being sold to Hollywood with our daily images; who adopt the policy of
continuous non-violent direct action in the streets, open to everybodys participation;
we are independent people who make momentary decisions.
As the anti-surveillance NOBESE action group, we came together and organized
through the Internet in 2005, against the MOBESE (Mobile Electronic System
Integration Project) surveillance system recently constructed in Istanbul. Following
the news in all media about the new surveillance cameras on the way to being built
with intensity in several places (570 spots, more than 4000 cameras, for 770,000
euros) in Istanbul, we decided to take action. At the time, one of our friends was
acting in George Orwells play 1984. We prepared some leaflets about the new
surveillance system in Istanbul to hand out to the visitors in the theatre. As soon as
we got the information about the official opening ceremony of the MOBESE camera
system, we got ready for street actions.
We prepared banners, created an action group, chose a cameramen and a person
for media relations. As the location for action, we chose the heart of Istanbul, Istiklal
Street; the most crowded historical pedestrian street of Istanbul. We spotted camera
locations on this street. Our first street action took place on June 19, 2005, just one
week after the official ceremony of the MOBESE Cameras and Surveillance System.
We first tied neckties with evil eyes on them to the camera poles. Four players tied
themselves to a single chair and carried it through the street. The chair symbolized
power that is meaningless without the support of officials who carry it. We looked at
the cameras with binoculars to reverse the situation and show that the officials
become annoyed when they are watched. We took photos in front of the cameras. We
handed out our announcements with evil eye stickers on them and we played
music with our own instruments. We had walked to Galatasaray Square with a crowd
of people watching us.
Media attendance was around 35 people and the number of the police who were
following us was 20 times more than the protestors. One of the players had showed
his middle finger to cameras, which was enough for the police to get wilder. Some
of the players were taken into custody and were held for four hours because they
insulted citizens.
After the first street action, we have conducted 14 more similar street actions. On
March 19 and 20, 2006, we organized an international day against surveillance that
was also held in the USA, Austria, and Lithuania.
Appendix | 247
We have reached thousands of people on the streets directly and much more indirectly with high media coverage. Our street action principle was simple: Streets
arent your studios, you arent directors of our lives; we are not your actors.dont
watch us!
www.izleniyoruz.net
(we are under surveillance)
hepimiz@izleniyoruz.net
(we are all under surveillance)
248 | Appendix
Theorizing about cultural activism is like theorizing about sexual intercourse. All the
theory in the world isnt going to get you laid, and will in fact probably impede your
chances, so why not just shut your mouth, drop the trousers, and get on with it?
Youll be happier in the end, and we wont have to listen to your boring psycho-sociopolitical babble. The theoretical basis of our movement is not a positive quantity, or
even a null set, but a negative number. We are anti-theory, and any pompous gasbag
who tries to theorize us is in for the non-theoretical ass-kicking of his life.
Practice, not theory, is what defines the BLF. For more than thirty years, our members have been climbing up on billboards and changing them. Does that sound mysterious or enigmatic in any way? Does it seem to require a lengthy manifesto? The
practice is its own theory, the action its own reward, and if you try to read anything
further into it, you are, quite simply, an idiot.
Historically, the BLF has its origins in a prior group, the San Francisco Suicide
Club, and that legacy may help explain our distaste for polemics. The motivating idea
behind the Suicide Club was, simply put, that you should live your life as if facing
imminent death, becausewho knowsmaybe you are. And if youve only got an
hour left to live, or a day or a week, are you going to sit around and talk about it, or
maybe get up off your doomed ass and do something before the meat falls off your
sorry bones?
Back in 1977, a group of Suicide Club members were taken, blindfolded, to an
unknown destination. When the blindfolds were removed, they found themselves on
a city rooftop, at the foot of an enormous billboard, with a selection of paints and
tools before them. Guts and a sense of play, rather than any particular agenda, were
what drove them to alter that first board. Two of the participants that night, Jack
Napier and Irving Glick, went on to found the BLF, and from them we inherit that same
outlook.
While some of our past actions may seem, at first glance, to be politically motivated, this is quite simply not the case. As a group, we are politically diverse and resolutely incapable of agreeing on any sort of mutual agenda other than a shared love
of satire, and a general desire to shake things up a bit before we kick off. When we
alter a cigarette board, its not because we hate the tobacco companies, but because
we think its hilarious to put a neon deaths head on Joe Camel. When we expose the
not-so-covert ties between AT&T and the NSA, were not wagging our fingers, were
holding our sides to keep our guts from spilling out with laughter. Call us shallow if
you like, but if it doesnt make us laugh, we just arent interested in doing it.
Appendix | 249
Our other main motivator, besides having a giggle or two, is the visceral thrill of
climbing up on a sign face at night. It is, in a word, funfun in a way that no amount
of reading, writing, or talking can ever compare with. Up on a board, you own the
night. You own the city. You are the master of all that you survey. And if you dont have
the guts to shut up and start climbing, you will never, ever know what I mean. Now
stuff that in your theoretical pipe and smoke it.
250 | Appendix
Vacuum cleaner
The vacuum cleaner is an artist and activist collective of one fashioning radical social
and ecological change. By employing various creative legal and illegal tactics and
forms, the vacuum cleaner attempts to disrupt concentrations of power and reverse
the impending collapse of planet earth.
The vacuum cleaner works in varied and specific forms, including performance
interventions in corporate and public spaces, hactivist websites, social sculptures,
television documentaries, and culture jamming videos. They have taken on some of
the biggest corporations on the planet including Starbucks, the Virgin Empire,
Selfridges, Nokia, Asda Wal-Mart, and Sainsburys.
The vacuum cleaner has also shown documentation and done performances and
installations for the art world including Tate Modern, ICA, CCA, Liverpool Biennial (UK)
Museum of Contemporary Art (USA), Digital Arts Laboratory (Israel), Society for Arts
and Technology (Canada), Anti Festival (Finland), and Impakt (Holland).
Sometimes the vacuum cleaner indulges the mainstream media and show its
work on TV and in Print, including showing work on Channel 4, BBC4, Guardian, The
Big Issue (UK), Arte (France and Germany), Canal (France), ATA, and Free Speech
TV (USA).
The vacuum cleaner is a co-founder of the Laboratory of Insurrectionary Imagination,
founder of The Very Cooperative and honorary member of the New Social Art Social.
Works of note include:
Cleaning Up After Capitalism a series of performance interventions taking place
in corporate and public spaces, which involved cleaning up after all the dirt made by
capitalism. Places cleaned include banks, shops and shopping Centres, and the
financial districts of London and New York.
The Church of the Immaculate Consumption If shopping is the new religion, praying to products is the only logical step. Acts of worship taking place in the UKs most
expensive department stores.
Recall Starbucks Logo Fault Subverting the Starbucks logo to read Fuck Off.
Taking place in Starbucks in the UK and USA and online. Starbucks forced us to pull
our website www.starbuckscoffee.co.uk
Free Music For Suckers A fake guerrilla marketing campaign and action promoting free culture and free CDs from a Virgin Megastore.
The ArkPromoting cardboard Arks as a global warming solution.
www.thevacuumcleaner.co.uk
Appendix | 251
252 | Appendix
Authority commonly wields power through the manipulation of sign systems which individuals are collectively programmed to accept as valid structures of discipline and control. Outlined below is a sequence of actions that will effectively illustrate the
aforementioned dynamic. Further, the following sequence of actions also serves as a
general spell for revealing that authority is a subjective force, and that victory is
awarded to those who play the Sign Game best. While strict adherence to the spell will
often yield successful results, an accurate understanding of the underlying principles
will allow for delightful adaptations and diverse applications. Have fun & good luck!
1. Choose an institutional target (school, corporation, government agency, etc.).
2. Create a small label (approx. 3 4) which includes the institutions seal or logo,
as well as the words: Signs or Graffiti Permitted on This Surface (or an appropriate variation of your choosing).
3. Affix the labels to various surfaces within the institution. At first, it is best to target
surfaces that have existing postings or writing, e.g., bulletin boards, bathroom
walls, pay phones, etc.
4. Begin responding to your own labels by covertly adding signs, postings, and graffiti.
Be sure to vary the content and use multiple scripts or different graphic elements.
Some gestures, tags, or styles should appear more prolific than others so as to convince the authorities that multiple individuals are responding to the labels in no
organized fashion.
5. On institutional letterhead, create your own notice harshly condemning the labels,
the postings, and the writings. The notice should be brief, but the tone should
sound severe and reactionary. Citing non-existent laws or rules that promise
extreme penalties should be included to encourage debate. Mis-spelling a key word
or two will aid in undermining the voice of Authority, as well as give the impression
that Authority is, in fact, a small group of controlling individuals who assert their will
on the greater community.
6. Before the institution can respond to the postings and graffiti, covertly distribute
this notice as widely as possible. Post it in areas where no previous postings have
appeared as well as in the most obvious places. Place notices in employee/student
mailboxes, on the windshields of parked cars, or in lunchrooms, and other meeting
areas. The distribution of this notice should appear obsessive/compulsive.
7. Replace any labels that have since been removed and continue to add graffiti and
postings. At this point, some graffiti/postings should be direct responses to the
Appendix | 253
institutional notice. Some responses should sound incensed, while others should
appear mocking. Most likely, other anonymous individuals will have joined in at this
point and the debate should be widening.
8. Locate a blank section of wall, or an area where graffiti has been allowed to persist.
Using a slightly off-color shade of paint, cover a large, uneven section of the wall.
Affix a sign alongside reading Wet Paint and another stating that any graffiti
which does not beautify the area will not be tolerated). This will give the impression that the Authorities are ineptly attempting to cover the graffiti, while simultaneously giving a nod to acts of beauty.
9. Create a second notice stating that employees/students/community members
may be subject to random searches for graffiti paraphernalia. Distribute it widely.
Additionally, signs should be posted declaring rewards for reporting graffiti as well
as phone numbers to call (police, management, etc.).
10. Continue to add graffiti and postings, but extend the range outside the proximity of
the labels.
11. If the debate has become heated enough at this point, create another notice/email
in the voice of Authority declaring a town hall meeting with attendance required.
Be sure to include a sentence indicating that food and beverages will be provided
(you may even want to place a large order for pizzas to be delivered). The date of
the meeting should give the authorities as little time to prepare as possible.
A note on the workplace: If the target institution is the workplace, then give consideration to the scheduling time. A lunch-hour meeting will impose on co-workers and
encourage opposition to the institution. A mid-afternoon or mid-morning meeting will
result in a period of non-productivity that will provide a much-deserved break for your
co-workers. An after-work meeting time should include a promise of overtime wage
compensation for all attendees.
1. Have fun at the meeting, but be careful not to take sides in a manner that will draw
attention to you. At most, make constructive suggestions or offer compromises
such as calling for more communal space or resources (a community center,
lounge, or project funding), asking for more community dialogue or representation
(push for shared power and self-management), or requesting conditions that are
less restrictive/oppressive (more time off, fewer rules or better use of community
funds). Or, just sit back and watch the fireworks.
2. If events havent climaxed by this point, create a final notice summarizing the institutions willingness to respond to concerns raised at the meeting. Declare new policies
and promises; be sure to be creative about your desires (designated graffiti/posting
zones, slackening of rules or restrictions, school/business holidays, etc.). At this
point, you and your community are the authorities, so start acting like it by making the
necessary changes and organizing for a better tomorrow!
254 | Appendix
The Contributors
Index
0100101110101101.ORG, 229232
Abrams, M.H., 62
149, 154
Agamben, Giorgio, 51, 123
Black, Bob, 22
Blake, William, 45
Bloch, Ernst, 63
Arns, Inke, 82
Bologna, Sergio, 77
163, 164
Buck-Morss, Susan, 44
Banksy, 15, 35, 36, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54,
Bui, Roberto, 79
Bush, George W., 10, 147, 189, 202, 208,
217
C
Cardogan, Peter, 174
Center for Tactical Magic, 252254
Index | 257
Chainworkers, 221223
Etctera, 10
224225
Churchill, Ward, 166
Evil Twin, 10
Eymer, Rick, 46, 47
Federici, Silvia, 76
CODEPINK, 9
Fortunati, Leopoldina, 76
Colectivo Situaciones, 30
Fumagalli, Andrea, 76
Cultures of Resistance, 10
G
Geldof, Bob, 192
D
Dada, 11, 17, 21, 22, 115, 116, 119121,
124, 125, 131, 170, 178
Girard, Rene, 37
214216, 217
Debord, Guy, 11, 14, 116, 121124, 135,
224
Harrison, C. 119
Hausmann, Raoul, 118
258 | Index
Lettrists, 72
Lyotard, Jean-Franois, 83
Hughes, Robert, 53
M
I
Malinowski, Bronislaw, 80
Marazzi, Christian, 77
Improv Everywhere, 10
Marx, Karl, 15, 22, 23, 47, 60, 75, 76, 77,
79, 90, 121, 125, 136, 138, 145, 147,
K
Kant, Immanuel, 29, 38
Knabb, Ken, 11
Kolonel Klepto, 207, 216
L
Laboratory of Insurrectionary Imagination,
10, 192
Laibach/NSK, 82
Las Agencias, 10
Obama, Barack, 10
154
209213, 217
Index | 259
P
Pasquinelli, Matteo, 82
Subcomandante Marcos, 78
Surrealism, 21, 22, 27
Swoon, 53, 54
R
Rabelais, Franois, 181, 184, 191,
211
213, 217
Trapese Collective, 21
Raphael, Max, 56
132
Reclaim the Streets, 22, 31
186
Reeves, Phil, 97
Reverend Billy, 10, 18
Warhol, Andy, 51
260 | Index
186
YoMango!, 82, 93
Yesh Gvul, 235
Y
Yes Men, the, 9, 10, 18, 82, 138, 199201,
206, 207, 209, 211, 212, 216, 217, 231
Yippies, 11, 164, 165
Index | 261