Anda di halaman 1dari 2

68 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

1 / Monday, January 3, 2005 / Proposed Rules

List of Subjects subject line the following: ‘‘Comments preventing overfishing and rebuilding
on the Monkfish Amendment 2.’’ overfished stocks; (2) a need to improve
47 CFR Part 73 • Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: monkfish data collection and research;
Television. http://www.regulations.gov. (3) the need to establish a North Atlantic
• Mail: Comments submitted by mail Fisheries Organization (NAFO)
47 CFR Part 76
should be sent to Patricia A. Kurkul, exemption program for monkfish;
Cable television. Regional Administrator, Northeast multiple vessel baseline specifications
Federal Communications Commission. Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, for limited access monkfish vessels; (4)
Marlene H. Dortch, Gloucester, MA 01930–2298. Mark the a need to update environmental
Secretary.
outside of the envelope ‘‘Comments on documents describing the impact of the
the Monkfish Amendment 2.’’ FMP; and, (5) a need to reduce FMP
[FR Doc. 04–28174 Filed 12–30–04; 8:45 am]
• Facsimile (fax): Comments complexity where possible.
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
submitted by fax should be faxed to Amendment 2 evaluates and includes
(978) 281–9135. the following measures to minimize the
Copies of Amendment 2, the FSEIS, adverse effects of fishing on EFH: A
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE RIR, and IRFA are available from Paul maximum disc diameter of 6 inches
J. Howard, Executive Director, New (15.2 cm) for trawl gear vessels fishing
National Oceanic and Atmospheric England Fishery Management Council,
Administration in the Southern Fishery Management
50 Water Street, Newburyport, MA Area (SFMA); and closure of two deep-
01950. These documents are also sea canyon areas to all gears when
50 CFR Part 648 available online at http:// fishing under the monkfish day-at-sea
[I.D. 122304D] www.nefmc.org. (DAS) program. Amendment 2 also
RIN 0648–AN25 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: proposes the following management
Allison R. Ferreira, Fishery Policy measures: (1) A new limited access
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Analyst, (978) 281–9103; fax (978) 281– permit for qualified vessels fishing
Conservation and Management Act 9135; e-mail: allison.ferreira@noaa.gov. south of 38o 20’ N. lat.; (2) an offshore
Provisions; Fisheries of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice trawl fishery in the SFMA;
Northeastern United States; Monkfish of availability for the Draft establishment of a research DAS set-
Fishery; Amendment 2 to the Monkfish Supplemental Environmental Impact aside program; (3) an exemption
Fishery Management Plan Statement (DSEIS) for Amendment 2 program for vessels fishing outside of
was published in the Federal Register the Exclusive Economic Zone; (4)
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries on April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23571), with adjustments to the incidental monkfish
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and public comment accepted through July catch limits; a decrease in the minimum
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 28, 2004. After considering all monkfish size in the SFMA; (5) removal
Commerce. comments on the DSEIS, the NEFMC of the 20–day block requirement;
ACTION: Notice of availability of a fishery and MAFMC adopted the final measures revisions to the monkfish baseline
management plan amendment; request to be included in Amendment 2 at their provisions; and (6) additions to the
for comments. respective September 14–16, 2004, and frameworable measures.
October 4–6, 2004, meetings, and voted Public comments are being solicited
SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the
to submit the Amendment 2 document, on Amendment 2 and its incorporated
New England Fishery Management including the FSEIS, to NMFS. documents through the end of the
Council (NEFMC) and the Mid-Atlantic The NEFMC and MAFMC developed comment period stated in this notice of
Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) Amendment 2 to address a number of availability. A proposed rule that would
have submitted Amendment 2 to the issues that arose out of the implement Amendment 2 may be
Monkfish Fishery Management Plan implementation of the original FMP, as published in the Federal Register for
(FMP) (Amendment 2) incorporating the well as issues that were identified public comment, following NMFS’s
draft Final Supplemental Environmental during public scoping. Issues arising evaluation of the proposed rule under
Impact Statement (FSEIS), Regulatory from the original FMP include: (1) The the procedures of the Magnuson-Stevens
Impact Review (RIR), and the Initial displacement of vessels from their Act. Public comments on the proposed
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), established monkfish fisheries due to rule must be received by the end of the
for Secretarial review and is requesting restrictive trip limits; (2) unattainable comment period provided in this notice
comments from the public. Amendment permit qualification criteria for vessels of availability of Amendment 2 to be
2 was developed to address essential in the southern end of the range of the considered in the approval/disapproval
fish habitat (EFH) and bycatch issues, fishery; (3) discards (bycatch) of decision on the amendment. All
and to revise the FMP to address several monkfish due to regulations (i.e., comments received by March 3, 2005,
issues raised during the public scoping minimum size restrictions and whether specifically directed to
process. The intent of this action is to incidental catch limits); and (4) Amendment 2 or the proposed rule, will
provide efficient management of the deficiencies in meeting Magnuson- be considered in the approval/
monkfish fishery and to meet Stevens Fishery Conservation and disapproval decision on Amendment 2.
conservation objectives. Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Comments received after that date will
DATES: Comments must be received on Act) requirements pertaining to not be considered in the decision to
or before March 3, 2005. protection of EFH in accordance with approve or disapprove Amendment 2.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the the Joint Stipulation and Order resulting Therefore, to be considered, comments
proposed interim rule may be submitted from the legal challenge American must be received by close of business on
by any of the following methods: Oceans Campaign, et al. v. Daley. Issues the last date of the comment period,
• E-mail: E-mail comments may be arising from public scoping include: (1) March 3, 2005; that does not mean
submitted to http:// Deficiencies in meeting Magnuson- postmarked or otherwise transmitted by
monkamend2@noaa.gov. Include in the Stevens Act requirements, including that date.

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:41 Dec 30, 2004 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM 03JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2005 / Proposed Rules 69

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: December 27, 2004.


Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 04–28738 Filed 12–30–04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:41 Dec 30, 2004 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM 03JAP1

Anda mungkin juga menyukai